Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.
Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.
The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.
Elon Musk Is a Better Patriot Than 99% of Dems, But He’s Still Dead Wrong About One Key Issue
Judge backs Trump admin’s deportation push for 8 illegal migrants after another judge blocks it
Trump signs ‘big, beautiful’ bill in sweeping victory for second term agenda, overcoming Dems and GOP rebels
The Biggest Exodus of Wealth Is Happening in a Western Nation, And the US Should Take Note
Sewn with pride: Flag factory gears up for 250th anniversary of nation
Texas river flood leaves at least 6 dead as emergency crews race to find others missing; camp evacuated
Joey ‘Jaws’ Chestnut regains title in annual hot dog eating contest
Judge temporarily halts South Sudan deportations despite Trump wins at Supreme Court
‘Sick of Trump, Sick of ICE’ Protests Highlight Exactly What’s Wrong with the Left
Florida city commissioner ‘shocked’ to stand alone as colleagues defy Trump immigration crackdown
Big Beautiful Bill immediately hits the campaign trail in battle for Congress
Feds Breeding Billions of Flies, Planning to Dump Them on Texas and Mexico
DOJ Eyeing Oscars Awards, Paving Way for Trump to Make Hollywood Great Again
Zelensky confirms call with Trump after Russia launched largest aerial assault of Ukraine war
U.S. Restaurants Ask Trump for ‘Targeted Relief’ Amid Fierce Crackdown
But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.
Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”
When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.
In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.
Elon Musk Is a Better Patriot Than 99% of Dems, But He’s Still Dead Wrong About One Key Issue
Judge backs Trump admin’s deportation push for 8 illegal migrants after another judge blocks it
Trump signs ‘big, beautiful’ bill in sweeping victory for second term agenda, overcoming Dems and GOP rebels
The Biggest Exodus of Wealth Is Happening in a Western Nation, And the US Should Take Note
Sewn with pride: Flag factory gears up for 250th anniversary of nation
Texas river flood leaves at least 6 dead as emergency crews race to find others missing; camp evacuated
Joey ‘Jaws’ Chestnut regains title in annual hot dog eating contest
Judge temporarily halts South Sudan deportations despite Trump wins at Supreme Court
‘Sick of Trump, Sick of ICE’ Protests Highlight Exactly What’s Wrong with the Left
Florida city commissioner ‘shocked’ to stand alone as colleagues defy Trump immigration crackdown
Big Beautiful Bill immediately hits the campaign trail in battle for Congress
Feds Breeding Billions of Flies, Planning to Dump Them on Texas and Mexico
DOJ Eyeing Oscars Awards, Paving Way for Trump to Make Hollywood Great Again
Zelensky confirms call with Trump after Russia launched largest aerial assault of Ukraine war
U.S. Restaurants Ask Trump for ‘Targeted Relief’ Amid Fierce Crackdown
But it’s also a result of the way that Warren has framed her campaign as a kind of populist uprising, one that pits the middle class against the upper crust. Warren’s entire presidential bid, and much of her career as a public figure, is predicated on the notion that her plans will come at no cost to ordinary families and that the costs of her plans will be born solely by the richest of the rich.
This is the story that Warren tells every day. It is the foundation of her presidential bid, and she is apparently unable or unwilling to deviate from it, even when the facts indicate otherwise.
There is little question that Medicare for All would require higher taxes on the middle class. But to admit that would muddle her easy populist narrative, so she goes out of her way to avoid making that admission. As is so often the case for Warren, the simple story is more important than the plain truth.
Story cited here.
