Attorney General William Barr reportedly disagrees with a finding by the forthcoming Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) report that the FBI had sufficient reason to monitor the Trump campaign in 2016.
The FBI conducted surveillance on Trump campaign associates, including foreign policy aide Carter Page, on the basis of suspicions that the campaign might have been colluding with Russia to interfere with the 2016 election.
No evidence of collusion was ever found, though the surveillance continued well after the election, and the fact that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign over Russia was leaked to Democrats and to the mainstream media.
The IG report is expected to criticize the FBI for the way in which it approached the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to obtain a warrant for that surveillance. The FBI partly relied upon the so-called “dossier” prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele for Fusion GPS, an opposition research company being paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Republicans have claimed that the FBI failed to corroborate the unproven allegations in the dossier, and hid its political origins from the FISA court.
Country artist shares why he’s throwing his star power into race to replace top Republican
GOP congressman reveals how he learned about 9/11 terror attacks in remote Alaska wilderness
Charlie Kirk assassination: Dispatch audio reveals suspect in black tactical gear, carrying long gun
Breaking Report: Cartridges from Gun Used in Charlie Kirk Shooting Engraved with ‘Transgender’ and ‘Anti-Fascist’ Messages
Video: Intriguing Announcement on Kirk Assassin Hits Media – Foreign Intel Now Involved
Charlie Kirk assassination witnesses describe minimal security, horrifying shooting
EXCLUSIVE: House GOP report alleges $20B green grants enriched Biden allies
Roy Cooper’s ‘racial equity’ task force under scrutiny after Charlotte rail stabbing
Conservative Christian Students Remember Charlie Kirk and His Legacy with Fondness
Texas University Draws a Line: Professor Fired, Admin Punished After Pushing Woke Gender Ideology on Students
House Democrats open probe into FBI’s handling of Epstein documents
Republicans boost Democrats’ demands to extend Obamacare subsidies
Pam Bondi says death penalty a possibility for Iryna Zarutska killer
JD Vance pens heartfelt tribute to Charlie Kirk after assassination: ‘You ran a good race, my friend’
Foreign leaders remember Charlie Kirk as defender of freedom after activist’s assassination
But there have been conflicting leaks about what the report, which is set to be released next Monday, will say about misconduct at the FBI. Several individuals have already seen drafts of the report, as they are mentioned in it.
The Washington Post reported Monday evening that IG Michael Horowitz, an Obama administration appointee, had concluded that there was, in fact, sufficient evidence to justify what Barr earlier called “spying” on the campaign.
Barr reportedly disagreed, though a spokesperson for the DOJ dismissed reports of a dispute between Barr and Horowitz: “Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week,” she said.
Horowitz was criticized for his 2018 report on how the FBI handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server, in which he found that officials mishandled the investigation but that political bias was not the reason.
Story cited here.
