America has a crime problem: We treat criminal laws as if they were terms of service on a website — blindly agreeing and praying we’ll never need to know what they say. But it isn’t ordinary Americans who do the clicking; Congress clicks for us.
Worse, most legislators are as blind to what’s inside the laws they enact, or how to enforce them, as your average iTunes user clicking “Yes” on the latest Apple user agreement.
Consider a crime we keep hearing about — obstruction of justice. During his confirmation hearings, Attorney General William Barr sparred with senators about the meaning of the word “corruptly” as it’s used in the obstruction statutes.
To Combat ICE, Reckless Dem. Rep. Spreads Plan That Will Destroy 911 System, Cut Off Citizens from Police, Fire, Medical Help
48 Hours After Taking Over Virginia, Dems Were Cutting Prison Sentences, Gutting Hand Ballot Recounts, Banning Gas Mowers, and So Much More
Nanny love triangle murders trial pits dueling stories of mastermind behind case ‘out of a TV movie’: expert
Trump endorsement rocks Louisiana Senate race as Letlow poised to jump in
NORAD aircraft to arrive in Greenland for routine exercises
US Marshals nab fugitive hiding under child’s bed: officials
Oklahoma Citizens Rise Up Against Plans to Build Mosque in Their Town
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps poses global threat even if Iranian regime is decapitated
House Speaker Mike Johnson tells British Parliament he came to ‘calm the waters’
One year back in the Oval Office, Trump White House says every major campaign promise delivered
172 Christians Abducted from Two Church Services in Nigeria
Trump inauguration a year later: ‘America First’ interpretation tests fragile coalition
ICE says immigrant who died in Texas detention center committed suicide
Judge and wife shot in broad daylight in Indiana, sparking massive multi-agency investigation
Dem Senator Warner admits Biden ‘screwed up’ the border, but claims ICE now targeting noncriminals
It was just one word, concerning one kind of crime, and yet there was sharp disagreement between the people writing laws and the man who would soon be enforcing them. Special counsel Robert Mueller spent 182 pages analyzing the president’s conduct under those same statutes, only to leave the ultimate question unresolved. When Barr returned for Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, Sen. Dianne Feinstein seemed flummoxed when he explained that instructing someone to lie isn’t necessarily a crime.
For answers, many have turned to the cavalcade of legal analysts on cable news declaring assuredly that the president definitely had, or definitely hadn’t, committed obstruction. Those watching at home had to wonder: Shouldn’t there be an actual answer? Isn’t everyone looking at the same law? Surely America’s most telegenic legal minds and seasoned government officials can definitively answer the binary question of whether the president obstructed justice. But they haven’t. Now some are calling on Congress to answer it in impeachment proceedings.
This tiresome exercise could be undertaken with countless other federal laws. Is it a crime to remove a migratory bird that has taken up roost in your house? It depends. Can you cut the tag off a mattress? Again, it depends. What does it depend on? Well, that depends too. Lawyers are conditioned to accept this, but it’s no less unsettling that, even when the facts are clear, lawmakers, law enforcers, judges and lawyers still can’t agree on what the law itself makes a crime.
To Combat ICE, Reckless Dem. Rep. Spreads Plan That Will Destroy 911 System, Cut Off Citizens from Police, Fire, Medical Help
48 Hours After Taking Over Virginia, Dems Were Cutting Prison Sentences, Gutting Hand Ballot Recounts, Banning Gas Mowers, and So Much More
Nanny love triangle murders trial pits dueling stories of mastermind behind case ‘out of a TV movie’: expert
Trump endorsement rocks Louisiana Senate race as Letlow poised to jump in
NORAD aircraft to arrive in Greenland for routine exercises
US Marshals nab fugitive hiding under child’s bed: officials
Oklahoma Citizens Rise Up Against Plans to Build Mosque in Their Town
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps poses global threat even if Iranian regime is decapitated
House Speaker Mike Johnson tells British Parliament he came to ‘calm the waters’
One year back in the Oval Office, Trump White House says every major campaign promise delivered
172 Christians Abducted from Two Church Services in Nigeria
Trump inauguration a year later: ‘America First’ interpretation tests fragile coalition
ICE says immigrant who died in Texas detention center committed suicide
Judge and wife shot in broad daylight in Indiana, sparking massive multi-agency investigation
Dem Senator Warner admits Biden ‘screwed up’ the border, but claims ICE now targeting noncriminals
It’s not just a federal problem. Nor is it an exclusively political one. The same day that the special counsel released his report, the highest court in the state of Washington issued an evenly split opinion concerning that state’s own obstruction statute. In it, eight justices of the Washington Supreme Court couldn’t agree whether a man’s refusal to open his door for police constituted a crime. There was no real dispute about the facts. There was a statute written in black and white. Yet the court split 4-4.
This kind of ambiguity is a problem for an executive branch charged with enforcing laws and a judiciary that applies them. It may soon become a very public problem for a Congress trying its hand at both. Mostly, however, it threatens all of us who are presumed to know the law, required to comply with it and barred from arguing ignorance of the law as an excuse.
If Congress really is about to embark on impeachment, perhaps lawmakers will learn a valuable lesson in the process. Let them slog through the muck of their own criminal statutes. Let them display how even they can’t agree on what the text of the law means. Then let America be reminded that we had better follow the untold thousands of laws written by these people or go to prison.
To Combat ICE, Reckless Dem. Rep. Spreads Plan That Will Destroy 911 System, Cut Off Citizens from Police, Fire, Medical Help
48 Hours After Taking Over Virginia, Dems Were Cutting Prison Sentences, Gutting Hand Ballot Recounts, Banning Gas Mowers, and So Much More
Nanny love triangle murders trial pits dueling stories of mastermind behind case ‘out of a TV movie’: expert
Trump endorsement rocks Louisiana Senate race as Letlow poised to jump in
NORAD aircraft to arrive in Greenland for routine exercises
US Marshals nab fugitive hiding under child’s bed: officials
Oklahoma Citizens Rise Up Against Plans to Build Mosque in Their Town
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps poses global threat even if Iranian regime is decapitated
House Speaker Mike Johnson tells British Parliament he came to ‘calm the waters’
One year back in the Oval Office, Trump White House says every major campaign promise delivered
172 Christians Abducted from Two Church Services in Nigeria
Trump inauguration a year later: ‘America First’ interpretation tests fragile coalition
ICE says immigrant who died in Texas detention center committed suicide
Judge and wife shot in broad daylight in Indiana, sparking massive multi-agency investigation
Dem Senator Warner admits Biden ‘screwed up’ the border, but claims ICE now targeting noncriminals
Impeachment or not, the problem is already on display. We spent two years and tens of millions of dollars on an investigation conducted by dozens of lawyers, all for a non-answer on whether one person committed a particular crime. Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of us could have violated any of the thousands of criminal laws on the books, and we would be hard-pressed to afford just one lawyer to defend us.
To be sure, criminal conduct is nuanced, and it’s impossible to write a perfect statute. But we shouldn’t ignore the danger in a system where lawmakers, the nation’s top prosecutor or a court of last resort can’t agree on whether something is a crime. Hopefully, lawmakers will soon spend less time politicking and more time making the law clearer.
Story cited here.
