America has a crime problem: We treat criminal laws as if they were terms of service on a website — blindly agreeing and praying we’ll never need to know what they say. But it isn’t ordinary Americans who do the clicking; Congress clicks for us.
Worse, most legislators are as blind to what’s inside the laws they enact, or how to enforce them, as your average iTunes user clicking “Yes” on the latest Apple user agreement.
Consider a crime we keep hearing about — obstruction of justice. During his confirmation hearings, Attorney General William Barr sparred with senators about the meaning of the word “corruptly” as it’s used in the obstruction statutes.
Iranian prosecutor denies canceling 800 executions as Trump claimed
House GOP slammed by conservatives for joining Dems on controversial ‘kill switch’ amendment
Trump keeps Macron under spotlight as Greenland talks grind forward from Davos
Dem. Rep. Melts down Over Boy, 5, Rescued by ICE – But Where Was She When Biden Left 300k Kids to Sex Trafficking and/or Abandonment?
She Hurt for Him: Priceless Video Shows Woman Behind Jack Smith Looking Like She’s in Physical Pain as GOP Reps Repeatedly Expose Him as Fraud
Trump Yanks ‘Prestigious’ Board of Peace Offer from Canada After War of Words at Davos
Venezuelan national accused of claiming control over Arizona community, threatening residents: report
Former Uvalde school officer says he doesn’t regret actions after not guilty verdict
J6 Cop Coughs Vulgar Curse to Republican Rep During Jack Smith Hearing
Liberal activist groups organize Minneapolis high schoolers to protest against ICE
Border Patrol union chief touts high morale despite clashes with agitators: ‘They are patriotic’
WATCH: Former ICE director reveals what goes into agency’s decisions on cities to target
Democrats push to blacklist ICE officers from future government jobs
NEA insider blows whistle on ‘toxic’ culture and far-left politics inside teachers union: ‘It’s a cult’
Trump Forces the Fake News to Stare at the Mugshots of Violent Illegal Criminals Caught By ICE
It was just one word, concerning one kind of crime, and yet there was sharp disagreement between the people writing laws and the man who would soon be enforcing them. Special counsel Robert Mueller spent 182 pages analyzing the president’s conduct under those same statutes, only to leave the ultimate question unresolved. When Barr returned for Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, Sen. Dianne Feinstein seemed flummoxed when he explained that instructing someone to lie isn’t necessarily a crime.
For answers, many have turned to the cavalcade of legal analysts on cable news declaring assuredly that the president definitely had, or definitely hadn’t, committed obstruction. Those watching at home had to wonder: Shouldn’t there be an actual answer? Isn’t everyone looking at the same law? Surely America’s most telegenic legal minds and seasoned government officials can definitively answer the binary question of whether the president obstructed justice. But they haven’t. Now some are calling on Congress to answer it in impeachment proceedings.
This tiresome exercise could be undertaken with countless other federal laws. Is it a crime to remove a migratory bird that has taken up roost in your house? It depends. Can you cut the tag off a mattress? Again, it depends. What does it depend on? Well, that depends too. Lawyers are conditioned to accept this, but it’s no less unsettling that, even when the facts are clear, lawmakers, law enforcers, judges and lawyers still can’t agree on what the law itself makes a crime.
Iranian prosecutor denies canceling 800 executions as Trump claimed
House GOP slammed by conservatives for joining Dems on controversial ‘kill switch’ amendment
Trump keeps Macron under spotlight as Greenland talks grind forward from Davos
Dem. Rep. Melts down Over Boy, 5, Rescued by ICE – But Where Was She When Biden Left 300k Kids to Sex Trafficking and/or Abandonment?
She Hurt for Him: Priceless Video Shows Woman Behind Jack Smith Looking Like She’s in Physical Pain as GOP Reps Repeatedly Expose Him as Fraud
Trump Yanks ‘Prestigious’ Board of Peace Offer from Canada After War of Words at Davos
Venezuelan national accused of claiming control over Arizona community, threatening residents: report
Former Uvalde school officer says he doesn’t regret actions after not guilty verdict
J6 Cop Coughs Vulgar Curse to Republican Rep During Jack Smith Hearing
Liberal activist groups organize Minneapolis high schoolers to protest against ICE
Border Patrol union chief touts high morale despite clashes with agitators: ‘They are patriotic’
WATCH: Former ICE director reveals what goes into agency’s decisions on cities to target
Democrats push to blacklist ICE officers from future government jobs
NEA insider blows whistle on ‘toxic’ culture and far-left politics inside teachers union: ‘It’s a cult’
Trump Forces the Fake News to Stare at the Mugshots of Violent Illegal Criminals Caught By ICE
It’s not just a federal problem. Nor is it an exclusively political one. The same day that the special counsel released his report, the highest court in the state of Washington issued an evenly split opinion concerning that state’s own obstruction statute. In it, eight justices of the Washington Supreme Court couldn’t agree whether a man’s refusal to open his door for police constituted a crime. There was no real dispute about the facts. There was a statute written in black and white. Yet the court split 4-4.
This kind of ambiguity is a problem for an executive branch charged with enforcing laws and a judiciary that applies them. It may soon become a very public problem for a Congress trying its hand at both. Mostly, however, it threatens all of us who are presumed to know the law, required to comply with it and barred from arguing ignorance of the law as an excuse.
If Congress really is about to embark on impeachment, perhaps lawmakers will learn a valuable lesson in the process. Let them slog through the muck of their own criminal statutes. Let them display how even they can’t agree on what the text of the law means. Then let America be reminded that we had better follow the untold thousands of laws written by these people or go to prison.
Iranian prosecutor denies canceling 800 executions as Trump claimed
House GOP slammed by conservatives for joining Dems on controversial ‘kill switch’ amendment
Trump keeps Macron under spotlight as Greenland talks grind forward from Davos
Dem. Rep. Melts down Over Boy, 5, Rescued by ICE – But Where Was She When Biden Left 300k Kids to Sex Trafficking and/or Abandonment?
She Hurt for Him: Priceless Video Shows Woman Behind Jack Smith Looking Like She’s in Physical Pain as GOP Reps Repeatedly Expose Him as Fraud
Trump Yanks ‘Prestigious’ Board of Peace Offer from Canada After War of Words at Davos
Venezuelan national accused of claiming control over Arizona community, threatening residents: report
Former Uvalde school officer says he doesn’t regret actions after not guilty verdict
J6 Cop Coughs Vulgar Curse to Republican Rep During Jack Smith Hearing
Liberal activist groups organize Minneapolis high schoolers to protest against ICE
Border Patrol union chief touts high morale despite clashes with agitators: ‘They are patriotic’
WATCH: Former ICE director reveals what goes into agency’s decisions on cities to target
Democrats push to blacklist ICE officers from future government jobs
NEA insider blows whistle on ‘toxic’ culture and far-left politics inside teachers union: ‘It’s a cult’
Trump Forces the Fake News to Stare at the Mugshots of Violent Illegal Criminals Caught By ICE
Impeachment or not, the problem is already on display. We spent two years and tens of millions of dollars on an investigation conducted by dozens of lawyers, all for a non-answer on whether one person committed a particular crime. Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of us could have violated any of the thousands of criminal laws on the books, and we would be hard-pressed to afford just one lawyer to defend us.
To be sure, criminal conduct is nuanced, and it’s impossible to write a perfect statute. But we shouldn’t ignore the danger in a system where lawmakers, the nation’s top prosecutor or a court of last resort can’t agree on whether something is a crime. Hopefully, lawmakers will soon spend less time politicking and more time making the law clearer.
Story cited here.
