News Opinons Politics

‘Whistleblower’ Never Disclosed Contact with House Intel Panel to Inspector General

The partisan CIA officer behind a so-called “whistleblower” complaint about President Donald Trump’s telephone call with the leader of Ukraine reportedly did not disclose his communications with a House Intelligence Committee staffer to the Intelligence Community inspector general.

According to Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, inspector general Michael Atkinson told lawmakers that he had “no knowledge” of the officer’s contacts with the House Intel panel aide. This week, a New York Times report revealed that the officer and staff member first discussed the allegations against the president before the inspector general received the complaint.


Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’
Troy Jackson, an anti-corporate Maine Senate hopeful, touts endorsements from lobbyists
Intruder Storms ‘Today’ Show Set and Attacks Host
Trump says Josh Shapiro ‘doesn’t have what it takes’ as he moves to define him before 2028
Alleged Feeding Our Future fraud ringleader transferred from Somalia to face US charges
Insurance companies put on notice for stranding trans patients who want to reverse surgeries
GOP’s $95B defense package survives critical hurdle amid fiscal hawk revolt
Blue Angels flyover ignites social media; Hegseth, Eric Trump respond
FCC Set to Rule Against ‘The View’: Report
Navy Launches Investigation After Low Airshow Flyover Causes Chaos on the Ground
Bessent invokes assassination attempt ‘2 hours after being sworn in’ in dramatic brushback of leftist threat
Missouri teen girl shot and killed at home, and now 3 friends face charges
Dems roasted for comparing Hegseth’s testosterone initiative to ‘gender-affirming care’
Watch: Professor Who Clams He Got Fired for Crazy Pro-Abortion Antics Comes Back for Revenge and Flops Even Harder
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Spotlighting 250 years of Jewish contributions to America

The Times reported that the staffer shared several of the officer’s claims with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA). The California Democrat is under fire for erroneously claiming in a recent interview that “we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.”

See also  Top economists and AI leaders warn of ‘unprecedented transformation’

“We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to,” Schiff told MSNBC contributor Sam Stein when asked if the two had ever spoken. “But I am sure the whistleblower has concerns that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national Intelligence just how he is supposed to communicate with Congress, and so the risk to the whistleblower is retaliation.”


Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’
Troy Jackson, an anti-corporate Maine Senate hopeful, touts endorsements from lobbyists
Intruder Storms ‘Today’ Show Set and Attacks Host
Trump says Josh Shapiro ‘doesn’t have what it takes’ as he moves to define him before 2028
Alleged Feeding Our Future fraud ringleader transferred from Somalia to face US charges
Insurance companies put on notice for stranding trans patients who want to reverse surgeries
GOP’s $95B defense package survives critical hurdle amid fiscal hawk revolt
Blue Angels flyover ignites social media; Hegseth, Eric Trump respond
FCC Set to Rule Against ‘The View’: Report
Navy Launches Investigation After Low Airshow Flyover Causes Chaos on the Ground
Bessent invokes assassination attempt ‘2 hours after being sworn in’ in dramatic brushback of leftist threat
Missouri teen girl shot and killed at home, and now 3 friends face charges
Dems roasted for comparing Hegseth’s testosterone initiative to ‘gender-affirming care’
Watch: Professor Who Clams He Got Fired for Crazy Pro-Abortion Antics Comes Back for Revenge and Flops Even Harder
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Spotlighting 250 years of Jewish contributions to America
See also  Judge bars Trump from using IRS immunity deal to evade investigation over past tax filings

In a statement earlier this week, a spokesperson for the House Intelligence panel acknowledged Schiff’s response to Stein’s question “should have been more carefully phrased.”

“Regarding Chairman Schiff’s comments on ‘Morning Joe,’ in the context, he intended to answer the question of whether the Committee had heard testimony from the whistleblower, which they had not,” said the spokesperson. “As he said in his answer, the whistleblower was then awaiting instructions from the acting [director of national intelligence] as to how the whistleblower could contact the Committee. Nonetheless he acknowledges that his statement should have been more carefully phrased to make that distinction clear.”

President Trump reacted Friday to Herridge’s report, tweeting: “WOW, this is big stuff!”


Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’
Troy Jackson, an anti-corporate Maine Senate hopeful, touts endorsements from lobbyists
Intruder Storms ‘Today’ Show Set and Attacks Host
Trump says Josh Shapiro ‘doesn’t have what it takes’ as he moves to define him before 2028
Alleged Feeding Our Future fraud ringleader transferred from Somalia to face US charges
Insurance companies put on notice for stranding trans patients who want to reverse surgeries
GOP’s $95B defense package survives critical hurdle amid fiscal hawk revolt
Blue Angels flyover ignites social media; Hegseth, Eric Trump respond
FCC Set to Rule Against ‘The View’: Report
Navy Launches Investigation After Low Airshow Flyover Causes Chaos on the Ground
Bessent invokes assassination attempt ‘2 hours after being sworn in’ in dramatic brushback of leftist threat
Missouri teen girl shot and killed at home, and now 3 friends face charges
Dems roasted for comparing Hegseth’s testosterone initiative to ‘gender-affirming care’
Watch: Professor Who Clams He Got Fired for Crazy Pro-Abortion Antics Comes Back for Revenge and Flops Even Harder
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Spotlighting 250 years of Jewish contributions to America
See also  Top economists and AI leaders warn of ‘unprecedented transformation’

The report raises further questions about both the CIA officer and his complaint. As Breitbart News reported, the so-called “whistleblower” failed to follow the law for protecting intelligence community members seeking to report wrongdoing by contacting the House Intelligence Committee before the Intelligence Community inspector general:

Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA) of 1998 explicitly requires an official concerned about wrongdoing within the government to go to the IC inspector general before the congressional panels in charge of oversight of the intelligence community.

[…]

The employee may contact the congressional intelligence committees directly as described in clause (i) only if the employee –

  • a. before making such a contact, furnishes to the DNI, through the IC IG, a statement of the employee’s complaint or information and notice of the employee’s intent to contact the congressional intelligence committees directly; and
  • b. obtains and follows from the DNI, through the IC IG, direction on how to contact the congressional intelligence committees in accordance with necessary and appropriate security procedures.

And yet, the officer’s failure to follow whistleblower laws isn’t the only red flag. The Inspector General found that the officer’s complaint was not only based on second-hand information, but that the officer also possessed a “political bias” in favor of a “political rival” of President Trump. CNN reported on Thursday that the officer is a registered Democrat.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter