On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
House Dem’s graphic chicken decapitation ‘horrified’ her college roommates: ‘Blood went everywhere’
What Republicans do, and don’t, want to hear from Trump at State of the Union
Cruz calls Newsom ‘historically illiterate,’ posts clown emoji after governor fires back
Oil-Rich California Relies on Fuel Imported from the Bahamas as Gas Prices Surge
Trump says ‘this is a Democrat shutdown’ as he touts low inflation, falling murder rate
Teen killed after protecting friends in ‘senseless’ shootout as locals raise alarm over rising crime in Bronx
Trump withholds endorsement for Texas Senate GOP primary
Thune guarantees voter ID bill to hit the Senate despite Schumer, Dem opposition: ‘We will have a vote’
Swalwell’s ‘I should be working’ gym, pool videos resurface as Dem rival hammers his missed House votes
Anderson Cooper announces 60 Minutes departure amid CBS shake-ups
Oregon Could Vote to Ban Hunting and Fishing – Proposed Law Would Classify Both as Cruelty to Animals
Tom Emmer blasts Democrats’ double standard on SAVE Act: ‘They require photo IDs’ at their own DNC
GOP reaches key 50-vote threshold for Trump-backed voter ID bill as Senate fight looms
At least two dead after ‘targeted’ shooting at Rhode Island hockey game
Indiana school secretary charged after husband finds her with student, probe reveals affair with another: cops
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
