On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Italy Strikes Sicilian Mafia Wealth, Seizing Gold, Villas and Cash
Maine GOP hopeful vying for Trump endorsement previously ran birthing clinics catering to migrant women
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart
Florida and Texas are battling for new residents. DeSantis thinks he found an advantage
A critic takes the measure of ‘Bluey’
WATCH: Mace says Trump’s endorsement hasn’t sealed SC gubernatorial race: ‘It’s a dog fight’
GOP firebrand lashes out at reporter over Massie allegation: ‘F— you, first of all!’
Jill Biden says former president will live with stage 4 cancer ‘for the rest of his life,’ has slowed down
Last surviving ‘Rosie the Riveters’ honored by WWII Museum on D-Day Anniversary: ‘We can do it’
Woman allegedly choked subway rider, yelled antisemitic remarks in attack caught on video: police
Girl known as ‘Chelsea Jane Doe’ ID’d 26 years after mutilated body found hundreds of miles from home state
At least a dozen shot near festival in Ohio; manhunt for suspects underway
Steve Hilton launches ad mocking Xavier Becerra’s ’36 years’ as a career politician in California gov race
WATCH – Smug Dem Rep’s Face Goes Totally Blank After a Cool Sec. Bessent Educates Him About His Own Branch of Government
GRAPHIC: The Excuse This Islamist Gives for Raping 250 Women Shows Why Islam and the West Can’t Exist Together
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
