On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Couric and Psaki condemn pressroom political diversity: Liberal Media Scream
Royal Navy catches two Russian spy ships in English Channel
Bodycam images show Luigi Mangione’s McDonald’s arrest as defense challenges evidence collection
Senate Democrat Facing Court-Martial Over Video Encouraging Military Personnel to Defy Trump
Leftists Accidentally Prove Therapist Correct After He Declares ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ Is Real
Chicago train attack suspect repeatedly violated curfew, movement restrictions, records show
Deep-pocketed conservative group once at odds with Trump now all-in to ‘help him win’
Federal judge dismisses James Comey, Letitia James indictments
DOJ Reveals ‘Damning’ Evidence Against Letitia James in New Court Filing
Alert: Bill and Hillary Clinton Ordered to Comply with House Oversight Subpoenas, Contempt Charges Already Being Threatened
Mike Johnson says House GOP working full steam ahead on Trump’s ‘affordability agenda’
Trump says those against tariffs ‘serving hostile foreign interests,’ ‘full benefit’ yet to be seen
Masked thieves in South American crime ring loot American homes in coordinated pattern, police warn
Chicago public schools blow millions on travel while students can’t read at grade level and more top headlines
Christianity Today Hires Woke Female CEO Amid Continued Liberal Shift
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
