On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Second Amendment Groups Target Purple State’s Decades-Long ‘Permission Slip’ Scheme With New Lawsuit
Artificial Intelligence May Change American Healthcare Forever, Study Suggests
Concertgoer dies after apparent fall from upper level at Madison Square Garden
‘The Era of Deportations Has Begun’: European Parliament Passes Toughest Immigration Policy in Decades
Multiple hikers dead amid scorching Grand Canyon temperatures
Mark Levin blasts Trump administration over Israel: ‘Stop trashing, smearing, bullying’ ally
Trump’s Iran gamble divides GOP hawks and ‘America First’ conservatives over what victory looks like
College sports sees pivotal moment as Senate looks to move legislation on NIL, transfers across goal line
New Report Says Major School System Hid Admissions Data Defying Supreme Court
Perverted: Meal Kit Company Runs Gross Pride Month Ad, Offering Recipes to Aid Vile Sex Act
Trump’s DOJ Just Did What Decades of Speeches Never Could
Elon Musk Gets Dealt Blow By Biden-Appointed Judge Days After Becoming Trillionaire
FAA investigates after incoming plane executes go-around due to aircraft leaving from intersecting runway
God’s Way Is Best – Marriage Found to Have Huge Benefits When It Comes to Cancer, Heart Health, Mental Health
Responders put out explosive blaze at fireworks stand in Oklahoma
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
