On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Trump matches Biden’s first year of US attorney nominees despite high-profile setbacks
House lawmakers reflect on their memorable moments in Congress
Trump Announces Christmas Day Strikes on Islamic Terrorists Involved in Nigerian Christian Genocide
Nebraska grandfather killed in ‘freak accident’ at McDonald’s drive-thru
Ultra High Level Democrat Influencer Calls for Violence Against ‘Dead Man Walking’ Trump on Christmas Eve – Calls on People to ‘Put Him to Sleep’
Santa with CCW gets pulled over, tells Ohio deputy ‘you got to protect yourself’ during festive traffic stop
Nonprofit uses underwater technology to search for missing service members
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: UN bigot out at Georgetown
Kim Jong Un swipes at South Korea’s progress building a nuclear submarine while inspecting his own
Poll: Young Protestants Are Officially Outnumbered by the ‘Nones’
Florida man kills wife, shoots stepdaughter over NFL game argument before taking own life
Wild Christmas Miracle: Watch a Bona Fide Miracle in Real Time as Skydiver Gets Caught on Plane, Plummets, then Manages to Cheat Death
Biden nearly invisible in own Christmas family photo as Hunter takes center stage
5 Things the GOP Needs to Change to Win the 2026 Midterms
Lawmakers attempt to tackle NIL, giving it the ‘old college try’
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
