On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
France restricts Trump ambassador’s access to officials after missed summons
Alert: Massive Development Reported in DOJ’s Sedition Case Against Mark Kelly, Others – Bad News for Trump Admin
Speechwriters from Reagan to Biden agree: Trump’s SOTU is a critical test for his second term
California GOP infighting could destroy any chance at governorship
Trump to come face-to-face with Supreme Court justices who rejected tariffs at State of the Union
Prosecutors: Utah Mom Who Wrote Children’s Book About Grief After Husband Died Actually Killed Him
FBI records contradict claims Biden was ‘not aware’ of Mar-a-Lago raid
Conservative super PAC drops six-figure ad buy in major move to defend Trump’s trifecta
EXCLUSIVE: Trump to center SOTU on working families with sweeping economic case
Good Samaritans Help Chicago Family Recover Stolen Dog
Potential ’28 Presidential Candidate Gavin Newsom Continues to Backtrack on Trans Sports Debate
Missouri suspect taken into custody after deputy fatally shot, ending manhunt
California allocating $35M to support illegal immigrants amid Trump’s mass deportation agenda
Biden friends voice concern over increased fatigue amid cancer battle: report
Manhunt underway after Missouri deputy slain, suspect’s truck spotted heading toward Arkansas border
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
