On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Kentucky trooper, father of 3, gunned down during traffic stop as suspect captured after manhunt
Lindsay Clancy holdout juror asks for one thing in new video after mistrial drama
Trump CMS faces bipartisan pushback over Medicare proposal tied to Biden-era drug pricing law
AI Companies and Major Unions Join Together for New Data Center Push
Sarah Huckabee Sanders Criticized Over ‘Welfare-To-Work Requirement’ Video That Depicts Young White Male as the Problem
Dem Senate nominee breaks silence after Susan Collins’ office was vandalized with vulgar message
Department of Education Officially Axes Biden’s ‘Illegal Title IX Rewrite’
‘Insulting’: Ex-Trump official’s ‘dishonest’ campaign ad triggers conservative revolt
Huckabee Announces Update on New US Embassy in Jerusalem Project
Fake Rabbi Catfishes Gaza Propaganda Photographer, Offers to Make His Dream Come True, Then Ruins It with Hilarious Reveal
GOP Sen. Susan Collins’ Office Vandalized with Vulgar Message Amid Tight Midterm Race
El-Sayed questions ethics of football in resurfaced audio
WATCH: NYPD bodycam captures tense standoff after Bank of America exec fatally stabbed in Times Square
Lindsay Clancy’s push to investigate holdout juror could be paused as defense, prosecutors agree to adjourn
Protester storms DC party, flips off crowd as ‘USA!’ chants erupt amid Trump’s AI push
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
