On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
DOJ Busts Massive International Sham Marriage Scheme, 1,000 Weddings to ‘Fraudulently Obtain Immigration Status’
FBI ran secret operation to extinguish Biden family foreign influence scandal: Declassified documents
Fox News Poll: New matchup, same result: Maine Senate race stays locked
Here’s who could replace White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt
New York Social Services Worker Charged With Issuing Multiple Benefit Cards to Herself
Hasan Piker cheers Mamdani aide going ‘beast mode’ with ‘impoverish the White middle-class’ remark
Deadly military helicopter crash in Texas kills 2, sparks wildfire and forces evacuations: officials
DOJ makes first arrest in Southern Poverty Law Center fraud case
Alex Murdaugh’s ‘Charleston or bust’ prayer shot down by prosecutors in fight over ‘Holy City’ retrial
Trump says Karoline Leavitt will leave White House press secretary role, become outside advisor
Former SPLC official arrested as feds expand case over alleged $4M scheme involving extremist groups
Former SPLC Exec Arrested on Fraud Charges Connected to KKK Relationship
DOJ charges 11 in alleged decadelong sham marriage scheme involving Chinese nationals
Report: Russia Is Giving China ‘Incredibly Important’ Military Technology to Use Against US
Trump’s dead ‘anti-weaponization fund’ comes back to life in Georgia Senate race
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
