On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Popular Food Delivery App Will Pay Millions After DOJ Says American Gig Workers Were Discriminated Against
Records Show Minnesota’s Democratic Senate Nominee Peggy Flanagan Lied About Her Past: Report
US pulls personnel from Saudi Arabia as kingdom comes under Houthi fire
Dr Oz takes Americans behind the doors of ‘clubhouse for crooks’ as feds hunt Medicare fraud
Trump supporters confronted with painful gas prices deliver striking response: ‘I’ll take that any day’
Mamdani-Linked Democratic Congressional Nominee Detained by IDF While in West Bank
Cuban American lawmakers hail Raúl Castro arrest warrant, vow to keep fighting for Cuba’s freedom
American woman masterminds $6 million marriage fraud scheme, Department of Justice says
Man Who Claimed His Wife Was Taken by ICE Arrested on Murder Charge After Human Remains Found
Grandfather gunned down in road rage attack days after burying Air Force son; convicted murderer charged
GOP launches ‘Jihad Jeopardy’ game to highlight Abdul el Sayed’s controversies
DOJ accuses fraud ring of facilitating hundreds of sham marriages for illegal immigrants
Polling’s dirty little secret
Macron slams Trump for ‘stupid’ comments about French riots and warns public of ‘foreign manipulation’
Ilhan Omar finally emerges after DC raid with video pleading for cash to fight Trump
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
