On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Two helicopters collide midair near Oregon airport with three people aboard, FAA confirms
Chili’s customers suffer chemical burns after dangerous margarita mix-up
A ghost story in the nation’s Capitol
El-Sayed’s Father Connected to Charity Once Accused of Financially Aiding Saddam Hussein
Minnesota official’s voter guide message on Somali TV triggers viral backlash: ‘Not an accident’
PHOTOS: Trump hosts trick-or-treaters at White House Halloween event
US dual citizen extradited to El Salvador, accused of killing son’s mother and abandoning toddler: DOJ
Harris pushes Georgia Democrats to turn ‘pain into purpose’ in fight against ‘tyrant’ Trump
Watch: Shattered Glass on Ground as DOJ Agents Hit Minneapolis Fraudsters Hard, Launching Multiple Simultaneous Raids Around City
Trump Admin Exposes North Korean Tech-Hiring Scam, US Companies Were Funding the Country’s Weapons
National Democrats leave Mary Peltola to fend for herself amid Alaska Senate scandal
Breaking: Sir Patrick Stewart, Legend from Star Trek and X-Men, Has Died Due to Previously Undisclosed Health Issues
Judge grills AG’s office in Cornell sex assault case as ex-frat bro’s lawyer demands ouster over alleged bias
9 Alleged Cartel-Linked Train Bandits Arrested in California
Dem probes could ‘torture’ young Trump officials with crushing legal bills, subpoenaed conservative warns
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
