On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Ex-con charged in Christmas Day CVS robbery that left clerk fatally stabbed
Rob Schneider Goes Off on Minneapolis Mayor for Fanning Flames After ICE Shooting
NASA makes ‘unprecedented’ call to bring astronauts home after illness, expert says: ‘Evacuated from orbit’
How One Trump Admin Arrest May Soon Refill the Strategic Oil Reserves Biden Drained
Left-wing group backs tens of thousands of anti-ICE demonstrations nationwide
Lib Reporter Faces Subpoena After Doxxing Delta Force Commander Over Maduro Capture
Charlie’s Legacy: Ex-Playboy Playmate Jenny McCarthy Has ‘Surrendered’ to Jesus, Says Kirk’s Death Immediately Drove Her to Start Studying the Bible
DC pipe bomb suspect pleads not guilty to planting devices at DNC and RNC headquarters
Trump says Venezuela has begun releasing political prisoners ‘in a BIG WAY’
Trump Launches Plan to Protect Americans from Getting ‘Ripped Off’ By Credit Card Companies
MTG May Have Leaked Trump’s Location to Unhinged Activists: White House
Justice urges ‘stand up for our girls’ as Supreme Court weighs fate of his ‘Save Women’s Sports Act’
Who is Michael David McKee, the man accused of killing ex-wife and dentist husband in Ohio
Hochul, AOC, Mamdani slam ‘we support Hamas’ chants at Queens protest: ‘Disgusting and antisemitic’
Aurora terrorized by Venezuelan gang as dictator Maduro let Tren de Aragua seize power
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
