On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Breaking: Holdout Juror in Lindsay Clancy Trial Issues First Statement: ‘I Didn’t Have Any Doubts’
Juror who blocked Lindsay Clancy verdict disputes fellow jurors’ claims: report
Incumbent GOP Rep Attacks Trump for Enforcing Immigration Law in ‘Stunning’ Campaign Ad
ICE deports ex-Liberian fighter accused of torture, recruiting child soldiers
Trump’s EPA reforms are a huge boost to manufacturers, but there’s more red tape to cut: expert
Mike Huckabee calls out Macklemore on antisemitism: ‘Voice’ of ‘Jew hatred’
Hasan Piker Doubles Down on America Hate, Says US Bigger Terror Group Than Al-Qaeda
Federal Judge Refers Soros-Funded DA for Criminal Prosecution After Finding ‘Credible Evidence’ He ‘Violated the Law’
Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare overbilled Medicaid by $47 million, federal audit finds
Trump DOJ official downplays antitrust concerns about companies coordinating AI safety development
Unearthed clip exposes what ‘DEI Queen’ in razor-thin House race thought of ‘Back the Blue’ law
Hasan Piker gives Democrats their latest headache after calling US ‘worse’ than al Qaeda
House GOP lawmaker under fire by fellow Republicans after ad bashing Trump on immigration
WATCH: Gaffe-prone Seattle socialist mayor cuts off police chief in yet another awkward interview
Texas Air National Guard pilot ejects safely before F-16 crash in Michigan
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
