On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Shark sightings surge along southern Maine coast as experts explain what’s driving the spike
Iceland votes on resuming EU membership talks as Trump’s push for neighboring Greenland looms over debate
North Carolina warns mobile petting zoo visitors of rabies exposure after baby goats test positive
Retired Port Authority officers tell Mamdani, Hochul to stay away from Ground Zero on 9/11
Former California councilman’s corruption unmasked after FBI finds cash buried in backyard
El-Sayed’s Demeaning Usha Vance Comments Set Stage for Major Backfire with Key Demo
Mississippi mayor argues against lowering flag for Dolly Parton after her death
Obama Judge Once Again Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order
Dems face uphill battle in challenge to Georgia Congressional map under new SCOTUS rules
Fauci’s Gov’t Division Worked Hand in Glove with the CIA: Docs
Abdul El-Sayed peppered with questions on Hasan Piker link, fracture with Jewish Dems at Michigan convention
UN Told Merchant Ships Not to Arm Themselves Against Pirates as Piracy Escalates
NYC parolee accused of killing 2 in 48-hour robbery spree hauled in after manhunt, cops say
Seneca Nation leader calls Trump’s Lake America renaming ‘unpresidential,’ demands reversal
Video: Parent Trips Youth Football Player Who Was Headed for a Touchdown
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
