On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Bernie Sanders demands Democrats ban super PACs from primaries, blasts AIPAC, ‘corrupt system’
Trump doubles down on reflecting pool vandalism allegations, cites new witness account
Teen burglary ring linked to nearly 80 Bay Area break-ins dismantled after months-long investigation: PD
Indian national accused of Arizona girlfriend’s murder entered US on student visa: federal sources
Spencer Pratt: Communists aren’t just ‘evil’ they’re ’embarrassingly cringe’
AOC freezes her eggs: ‘I think it’s bada**’
RNC chair says Talarico’s GOP crossover hopes are a ‘pipe dream’: ‘Nobody is going to follow him’
‘Outsider’ House primary winner sets sights on flipping longtime GOP seat back from Dems: ‘Ready for a change’
Max Miller locked in as Republican nominee after Ohio ballot deadline passes without withdrawal
Vice President Vance says migrant communities show ‘clear pattern’ in federal fraud as investigations widen
Massachusetts Governor Signs New Law Blocking ICE Access to Several Locations
DSA Governor Candidate Hires OnlyFans Model as Deputy Campaign Manager
Tennessee Candidate Arrested After Allegedly Shooting Down Flock Cameras
University of Michigan Goes Full Participation Trophy, Will Hide Grades for Student ‘Mental Health’
Florida man accused of killing nurse mom who helped him despite repeated arrests for threatening her: sheriff
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
