Uncategorized

Schiff: Dems Wanted ‘Whistleblower’ to Testify Until Trump Put ‘Life in Danger’

On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.

Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”


Federal judges acknowledge court ruling errors tied to staffers’ AI use after Grassley inquiry
Ace Frehley, 1951-2025
Vibe tweak: Review of ‘After the Hunt’
Man accused of sparking deadly Palisades Fire pleads not guilty
FBI opens investigation after driver allegedly rams ICE vehicle during Arizona traffic stop attempt
Hunter Biden says he almost ‘jumped on the stage’ to confront Obama for leading father offstage
Grassley releases memo showing DOJ ‘unleashed unchecked government power’ on Trump associates
Illegal immigrant truck driver in fatal California crash should never have had license: DOT report
AG Pam Bondi puts ex-Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot on notice over her vow to ‘unmask’ ICE agents
DOJ warns California officials to ‘stand down or face prosecution’ after threats to arrest ICE agents
Wife of DC sniper documentary ‘Hunted by my husband’: A story of abuse, fear, and freedom
Illegal alien failed CDL test 10 times in 2 months before fatal Florida crash that killed 3
Virginia Lt. Gov. candidate enlists AI to represent Dem opponent after she rejected debate offers
Letitia James to challenge Lindsey Halligan appointment in bid to have fraud charges dismissed
Pakistani national sentenced to long prison term for smuggling Iranian weapons to Houthis


He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”

He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”

See also  Schumer Learns 'Never Strike a King' Lesson as Trump Drives Stake Through Heart of His Pet Multi-Billion Project

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter