On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Biden’s last-minute emissions goal could be quickly reversed when Trump takes office
House report accuses Matt Gaetz of paying women for sex, using illegal drugs, accepting improper gifts
Luigi Mangione pleads not guilty to New York murder and terrorism charges
Pardoning Evil: Convict Biden Commuted Was Selling Teens to For-Profit Prison
Fact Check: Did Republicans Block Funding for Pediatric Cancer Research?
Manchin blasts ‘toxic’ Democratic brand in final break with his former party
Pence-led group urges Supreme Court to uphold TikTok divest-or-ban law: ‘Digital fentanyl’
Colorado ski resort gondola malfunctions, 174 rescued: ‘Once-in-a-lifetime-experience’
TikTok divestment could be ‘deal of the century’ for Trump, House China Committee chair says
Panama’s president hits back at Trump idea to reclaim key canal
Parents Speak Out After Daughter Suffers Life-Altering Injury Playing Volleyball Against Transgender Opponent
Biden commutes sentences for nearly all federal death row inmates and more top headlines
Merry Christmas to Female Athletes: Biden Admin Withdraws Title IX Changes in Unmistakable Admission of Defeat
The five most notable friendships Trump formed in 2024
Biden administration doled out millions to give LGBT migrants legal services, job training, and mental health support
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
