On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Pastor: Charlie Kirk’s graphic death was ‘traumatic’ as many Americans reconcile with loss
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the gambits to avoid a government shutdown over the next few days
Federal Reserve Finally Cuts Interest Rates, Signals It’s Just the Beginning
Charlie Kirk Told Off Donors Who Wanted Him to ‘Keep the Jesus Stuff Out of It,’ Mentor Reveals
Multiple officers involved in Pennsylvania shooting as governor rushes to York County scene
Menendez brothers’ bid for new trial rejected as killer slams judge’s decision as ‘mental gymnastics’
UK government left impotent by courts blocking deportation of illegal migrants
Incredible Reagan campaign relic for sale: $235,000
Newsom dials the rhetoric back up: ‘We’ll lose this democracy’
FLASHBACK: Mamdani labeled Kirk a ‘far-right extremist’ who should be canceled from speaking in NYC
95-Year-Old Woman Charged with Murder After Nursing Home Death
‘We Do Not Teach Victimhood’: Georgia Mentor Teaches Boys About Manhood
Utah Valley University mourns Charlie Kirk as campus reopens after assassination: ‘Extremely traumatic’
DHS blames political rhetoric for surge in assaults on ICE agents after Charlie Kirk murder
Trump Furious as Newly Released Documents Show Biden Admin Targeted Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
