On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Shock poll: Talarico ties Paxton in Texas Senate race, threatening GOP stronghold
GOP infighting over Trump’s voter ID bill erupts as top senator calls strategy ‘fantasy’
CA Neighbors Furious as Alleged Anti-Trump HOA Gets Ultimate Revenge in Lead Up to July 4
Priceless Video: ICE Guards Have to Protect Rioters from Female Employee Raging After They Hit Her Car
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce reported MSG wedding plans call for 1,000 guests, street closure at MSG: source
Heartbroken father blasts ‘broken’ system that let family massacre take his children before they could reunite
MS Now’s Longest-Running Anchor Is Out As Struggling Network Pivots to More Reliance on Podcasts
House GOP’s SAVE Act rescue plan hits resistance from conservative holdouts
Trump’s massive GOP faith bloc raises red flag on Iran deal: Trust him, not his team
Socialists take fight west, target Colorado in latest bid to oust Democratic Party establishment
Fetterman unleashes on ‘dirtbag’ wing of Dems after far-left victories: ‘Orgy of socialism’
Trump supporters rip Amy Coney Barrett after Supreme Court setbacks
A California dog rescue hid a grim secret: more than 100 dogs buried beneath it
DuckDuckGo’s AI Assistant Claims Trump and Vance Have Died from Rabies
CBS crew attacked by multiple men near Chicago museum, suspects arrested: police
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
