On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Texas couple labeled fake ‘Chip and Joanna Gaines’ admits $5M dream home renovation scam
Wife of former American detainee released after more than a year in Venezuelan prison
Why Trump zeroed in on Greenland and why it matters in 3 maps
California man kills wife, teen daughter in murder-suicide: authorities
St. Louis Calls Off Search for Band of Monkeys Allegedly Accompanied by a Goat After AI Images Flood Social Media
Leftist with ‘Any Pronouns’ Arrested for Assassination Threats Against Conservatives on Campus
Five Severed Human Heads Discovered Hanging on Beach in Apparent Drug Cartel Warning
Radical Groups Like Renee Good’s Are Tailing ICE All Over America
Trump accuses Tim Walz and Ilhan Omar of using ICE protests to distract from massive state fraud
Surgeon ex in Ohio dentist murders job hopped across country, dodged lawsuits after divorce
Cori Bush ripped for ‘jaw-dropping’ hypocrisy on key issue amid comeback House bid
The Redistricting Scheme That Could Help Dems Retake the House
Lawyers Claim Man’s Life ‘Stolen’ By ICE: Turns Out He Shot at an Officer
Professors were disciplined for vulgar posts after Charlie Kirk’s assassination: where are they now?
Russia tries to revive its relevance with support for Iran after failure to fight US moves in Venezuela
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
