On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
The Fentanyl Crisis May Be Coming to an End But Kratom Is Ready to Take It’s Place
Video Puts US Military Power on Full Display, Shows Total Missile-Strike Destruction of Iran Tankers
Sick: At 9:11 PM on 25th Anniversary of 9/11, Man Runs on Field at Yankee Stadium With Palestinian Flag
Nuns Fight Back Against Law Forcing Them to Help Patients Kill Themselves
Four Wisconsin cops injured after suspected drunk driver barrels toward crowd, sparks police chase
Ohio man convicted after trying to shoot ex-wife at point-blank range inside restaurant in chilling video
Cruz faces rowdy crowd at College GameDay while promoting the Protect College Sports Act
‘Just Because They Hated Guns’: Trump Pardons Sailor Biden’s ATF Put Away for 20 Years Over a Toy Gun
Dem handlers lash out when Ramaswamy staffer confronts their boss about debate: ‘No pictures’
Blue state governor’s pardon of convicted felon torpedos a major Supreme Court immigration fight
Trump says a united Ireland would be ‘fantastic’
This Couple Trapped Children in a Trailer for Years: Now Florida Is Seeking the Death Penalty
The one line from JD Vance’s GOP keynote that reveals his vision for America
Abdul El-Sayed touts ‘whole a–’ medical credentials while defending sex changes for children
God Took Me from Deformity, a Basement, and Agoraphobia to the Atlanta Hawks Locker Room
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
