On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Jasmine Crockett: ‘If I Go to Sleep, Democracy Very Well May Die’
Top Goldman Sachs Lawyer Quits Over Epstein Relationship, Media Glosses Over Her Connection to Obama
Conservative firebrand launches ‘TruckSafe Tipline’ to report illegal drivers amid spike in highway deaths
‘It’s absurd’: DHS shutdown bears down on US as lawmakers jet off to Europe
‘Fiction’: House Republican campaign chair dismisses Democrats’ expanding GOP target map
Government shutdown hits DHS after Democrats blow up bipartisan funding deal over immigration uproar
DHS enters shutdown after Congress skips town without deal on ICE
AI tool Claude helped capture Venezuelan dictator Maduro in US military raid operation: report
Federal agent attacked and hospitalized during anti-ICE protest in Downtown LA
Pima County sheriff no stranger to controversy as criticism in Nancy Guthrie case ramps up
US military launches deadly strike on drug-trafficking vessel in the Caribbean, leaving 3 dead
Liability or useful foil? Trump takes center stage in Susan Collins reelection fight
Schumer’s ‘E. coli’ burger photo resurfaces after another Dem’s grilling skills get torched: ‘What is that?’
Rubio steps into Munich spotlight as Trump leans on him to carry Vance’s populist message abroad
Trump ousts judge-installed prosecutor; constitutional expert says Article II leaves no doubt
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
