On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Not Joking: Somalian President of UN Security Council Is Now Tied to ‘Home Health Agency’ Convicted of Medicaid Fraud in Ohio
Watch: Trump’s DHS Delivers Horrible News to Ilhan Omar – She ‘Absolutely’ Can Be Denaturalized and They’re Investigating on ‘Massive’ Scale
Judge clears way for Minnesota welfare fraud ringleader to forfeit Porsche, millions held in accounts
Aldrich Ames, CIA officer who spied for Russia, dead at 84
Democrats walk Venezuela tightrope as some praise Maduro’s ouster
Highly Respected, Long Tenured NFL Head Coach Fired After Team Failed to Make the Playoffs
‘Squad’ Rep Ayanna Pressley’s ex-con husband slaps phone out of man’s hands as he tries to ask her a question
By Mamdani Aide’s Own Logic, Her Mom Apparently Wields ‘Weapon of White Supremacy’
Russia and China see danger and opportunity in the future of Trump’s ‘Donroe Doctrine’
NYC sex offender indicted for threatening to kill Jews, police and federal officials
James Comer to accuse Tim Walz of being ‘asleep at the wheel’ at fraud hearing
Wisconsin judge convicted of obstructing ICE resigns, vows to keep fighting case
Wyoming Supreme Court rules laws restricting abortion violate state constitution
Trump admin expands visa bond requirement to 38 countries, with fees up to $15K
Video shows masked thieves using sledgehammer in brazen Lululemon heist before fleeing in U-Haul
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
