On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Breaking: DHS Identifies 278,000 Foreigners Illegally Registered to Vote in Federal Elections
‘Shadow government’: Trump claims intel community bragged about hiding Chinese meddling
Trump releases declassified election intelligence, says it reveals ‘shocking vulnerabilities’
Video shows Canadian illegal alien slapping teen over Trump, ICE clothing: DHS
EXCLUSIVE: DHS seeks custody of illegal immigrant charged with murder after Trump deportation, Biden release
New York Democrat Pat Ryan pledges to refund AIPAC money. It could cost him $790,000
Fetterman Draws a Red Line on What Would Cause Him to Quit the Democratic Party
White House addresses growing parasite outbreak after more than 400 Americans sickened
More than a quarter-million noncitizens may be registered to vote in 4 key states, DHS alleges
Retiring GOP Sen. Tillis Vows to Block SAVE America Act Any Way He Can: ‘I Will Use Every Device’
‘A Disgrace’: White House Teleprompter Operator Placed on Leave After Alleged Scheme Uncovered
Secret Service says ‘we have to’ remove swords from statues near White House
Details of Todd Blanche’s behind-the-scenes meeting with Angel Mom revealed after Capitol Hill testimony
FBI investigating after ICE headquarters in Phoenix riddled with gunfire
Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
