On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Israel Strikes Inside Iran After ‘Fanatical Regime’ Targets Residential Areas with Missiles
Major Defense Contractor Unveils New Tech to Stop Drone Swarms
‘Auramaxxing’: How the Trump administration is beautifying DC ahead of America 250
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani says the Democratic Party ‘lost its focus on working people’
Why Trump picked Bill Pulte to lead US intelligence as critics question his qualifications
Leftist Seattle Mayor Walks Back Criticism of Major Company After It Starts Shifting Jobs to Nashville
Illegal Alien Gets Into Car Crash Near Another Illegal Alien Getting Arrested
Noncitizens on voter rolls in Democrat-run state exposed as RNC chair pledges secure elections
Walz administration ignored fraud warnings as billions vanished, House oversight report alleges
Walz administration used outside investigators to punish whistleblowers, oversight committee finds
Karmelo Anthony trial consumed by race and self-defense, but hidden hurdle could be key: expert
Raman overtakes Spencer Pratt in razor-thin race, AP count shows, but race remains uncalled
Spencer Pratt falls behind Nithya Raman in LA mayoral race after latest vote update
Video captures fireworks exploding from burning trailer that shut down Interstate 75
Multiple people stabbed near Penn Station, leaving one seriously injured as investigation continues
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
