On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Collins accuses Schumer of pushing attack ads filled with ‘outright lies’ in tight Maine race
Missing Utah teen Kylie Arellano found safe in Oregon after 500-day search
Michigan Democrats in disarray after Haley Stevens endorses Mike Rogers and gets kicked out of party
Chicago Assailants Picked the Victim, Quickly Discovered He Had a Concealed Carry Permit
Dems Forgot to Price The Loss When It Comes to Green Energy Grid: And Now We’re All Paying for It
Rogue AI Accessed Public Voter Info in Key Swing State Without Authorization
DOJ set to appeal ruling in Alaska Senate race dispute over ‘Decoy Dan’
Young Democrats Go After Maxine Waters: Then They Completely Regret It
AI Now Predicts Your Age And If You’ll Survive Cancer – All it Takes Is a Face Scan
Trump Admin Handing Out Massive Payouts to ‘Expose Fraud’ – Nick Shirley Already Received the First One
Savannah Guthrie makes heartbreaking plea in mom’s disappearance after finding old drawing
Chief of staff to Haley Stevens resigns after Mike Rogers endorsement
American Defense Innovator Takes the Fight to Beijing’s Electronic Dominance with Ambitious Made-in-America Military Computer
American Defense Innovator Takes the Fight to Beijing’s Electronic Dominance with Ambitious Made-in-America Military Computer
Private jet with 9 people on board crashes just miles from Mar-a-Lago
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
