On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
First on Fox: Trump admin opens new front in fraud crackdown targeting health insurers, drug middlemen
God Help Us: Donations Continued to Roll in for Karmelo Anthony After He Was Convicted of Murder
GRAPHIC LANGUAGE: ‘This Is a War,’ ‘Both … Brothers Should Be Dead!’ – Chilling Videos from Karmelo Anthony Supporters Outside Courthouse
Trump concession breathes new life into stalled FISA spy powers deal
Jimmy Kimmel trolls Spencer Pratt with U-Haul after primary loss, and Pratt responds
UK’s terrorism watchdog admits Trump administration may be right about migration being a national security issue
Former Louisiana mayor gets jail time for sex with son’s teen friend at house party
Cardi B’s reaction to Karmelo Anthony verdict draws millions of views and fierce criticism
Black Actor Shoots Down Having a ‘Woke’ James Bond: ‘That’s Not What They Like’
US Blocks Somali World Cup Referee from Entering the Country, and There’s Nothing FIFA Can Do About It
California’s 6th Congressional District primary result: Kevin Kiley will face Democrat Richard Pan
US Navy Sailor Admits to Killing Fellow Sailor in Barracks
Sen Tom Cotton urges DOJ to probe Chinese bid to ‘kneecap’ American AI
Bill Gates faces House investigators over Jeffrey Epstein ties
Ron DeSantis Calls Out Fellow Republicans for an AI Blunder That Left the Door Wide Open for Democrats
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
