On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what the Senate did and didn’t do overnight
One year on, US-brokered peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan cements US foothold in the Caucasus
Joe Biden’s cancer has spread further, leaving him in ‘very painful’ condition, Hunter reveals
Florida business owners allegedly scattered 1,500 mothballs on beach to send endangered birds packing
Don Lemon Whines to Judge and Blames Trump in Bid to Get Indictment Thrown Out
Cornell bans bear butchering after students carved up creature in dorm kitchen
‘DEI queen’: Virginia Dem’s past embrace of far-left prosecutors unearthed
Slain California fire captain’s wife admits murder after Mexico capture, serving time for killing first spouse
Megan Rapinoe Melts Down After Seeing Photo of Sophie Cunningham with Riley Gaines
Muslims Kill 30 Nigerian Christians in Latest Village Attack
Middle school student arrested after allegedly stashing homemade firearms for robbery plot: sheriff
Persecution of Egyptian Christians Continues in Series of Recent Incidents
Report: Muslim Brotherhood, US-Designated Terror Organization, Celebrates Abdul El-Sayed Primary Win Through Its Media Outlet
Self-Proclaimed Queer Priest Blasts Trump in Award Reception Speech
Dem Senate hopeful flip-flops on emerging issue impacting communities across US
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
