On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Transcript: Washington Examiner’s full interview with White House border czar Tom Homan
‘Babydog Justice’ back from surgery and feeling ‘paws-atively better’
Cuban ex-President Raul Castro indicted on charges including murder, conspiracy to kill US nationals
Trump-backed housing bill clears House after GOP defies Senate pressure campaign
Makeup Mogul Walks Away from Hollywood, Donates Fortune to Become Catholic Priest: ‘Never Been Happier’
‘Trying to Break Me… Because I am a Christian’: Ex-Lawmaker Targeted for 10 Commandments Capitol Monument
Georgetown Cupcake keg tosser suspected in second brazen M Street attack caught on video
Fmr Dem Rep Barney Frank, sharp-tongued liberal trailblazer, Dodd-Frank co-author dies
The red states charging ahead with America’s wealth as rivals watch billions slip away
Media Melts Down Over More White Afrikaners Coming to America as Refugees and We All Know Why
Leftists Are Spiraling After Thomas Massie’s Loss and Conservatives Should Take That as a Good Sign
Kentucky voters deliver verdict on Thomas Massie and more top headlines
Leftists Beg College Athletes to Ditch SEC Schools in States with Redistricting
Costco Recalls Popular Item After Person Suffers Second-Degree Burns
MTG says GOP’s future ‘destroyed’ after Trump-backed primary challenger defeats Thomas Massie in primary
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
