On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
US Military Plane Lost Amid ‘Operation Epic Fury’: US Central Command
Report: Veteran CBS Reporter Quit After Network Refused to Obsess Over Jan. 6 Anniversary
Retired Air Force Major General with Links to UFO Researcher Goes Missing – Search Underway
Legalize prostitution effort left candidate ‘shocked’ in blue state with rampant human trafficking
WATCH: Democratic Lawmaker Calls ‘Moms for Liberty’ a ‘Terrorist Group’ Then Doubles Down After Being Called Out
Old Dominion University shooter identified as Mohamed Jalloh, former National Guard member, ISIS supporter
FBI held active shooter training at Michigan synagogue weeks before attack
Manchin rips Cornyn for filibuster flip as Texas GOP runoff looms
Schumer swings at Hegseth over king crab meals for the troops, but Biden-era receipts show similar tab
Trump’s evolving stance on Iran ‘unconditional surrender’
Dems vote to keep DHS closed despite airport chaos, Iranian sleeper cell threat
BREAKING: Man Intentionally Rams Vehicle Into Michigan Synagogue and Opens Fire
Watch: Scott Jennings Calls on Internet to Fact-Check His CNN Colleague’s Insane Claim About Pete Hegseth
FBI responds to attack on Temple Israel synagogue in Michigan
Trump-backed affordable housing overhaul clears Senate, while House GOP raises red flags
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
