On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
CDU promises Germans stable solutions to immigration, terrorism, and defense ahead of election
DOJ issues complaint about federal judge’s ‘misconduct’ while presiding over military trans ban court case
Judge blocks parts of Trump executive orders targeting DEI, citing free speech
Trump says deal with Ukraine for US access to its rare earth minerals is ‘pretty close’
Supreme Court pauses Trump administration’s effort to fire head of whistleblower protection agency
Trump nominates Air Force Lt. Gen. Dan ‘Razin’ Caine for Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman
Notorious Trump-Hater Scurries Back After Saying Months Ago He Was Leaving
Judge grants 19 AGs preliminary injunction against DOGE access to Treasury payment system
Waukesha Parade Killer Darrell Brooks Boots Attorney Before Appeal, Decides to Represent Himself Again
Yankees Make Stunning Change to Team Rule That’s Been Around Since the ’70s
Byron Donalds, on cusp of Florida governor run, commands crowd at CPAC
Fact Check: Did Jesse Watters Turn Against DOGE? Absolutely Not
Luigi Mangione appears in court for UnitedHealthcare CEO killing: What to know
Nearly 200 Venezuelan illegal immigrants detained at Guantánamo Bay are flown back home
New Los Angeles DA Nathan Hochman does not support overturning Menendez brothers’ murder convictions
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
