On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Four Americans dead after building collapses near the Acropolis in Athens
So-Called Moderate Governor Candidate Wants More Trans Books in Elementary Schools
Leading Democrat Official Resigns After Probe Uncovers Sexual Harassment of Young Female Staffer
‘Tremendous Heresy’: CS Lewis’ Family Confirms He’d Be ‘Turning Over in His Grave’ Over Netflix’s Aslan Casting
During Shawn Ryan’s Podcast the British Government Slaps SAS Legend with Legal Notice
How Ukraine’s 40-day summer drone campaign to end the war with Russia backfired
Trump stumps for Protect College Sports Act at Texas-Tennessee game: ‘Bipartisanship for the first time in a while’
Applause Erupts as Crowd of Over 100,000 Sees Trump on the Jumbotron at Major SEC Showdown
They Told Us Trans People Are Dying Everywhere – Turns Out the Few Deaths That There Are Decreased Under Trump
Georgia man, 18, charged with murder after dismembered human remains found in car trunk
Trump claims stunning casualty numbers in Russia-Ukraine war
Trump’s home county hits pause on data centers over environment and electric bill concerns
Cruz says winning AI race against China is ‘single most important economic question’ for America
US, China strike deal to lower tariffs on $30B in goods after Trump-Xi Washington summit
Idaho Prop 1 Isn’t ‘Reproductive Freedom’: It’s a Vote to Kill More Babies
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
