On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Legal Expert: Don Lemon’s Legal Battle Could Have Devastating Unintended Consequences for Abortion Clinics
Watch: NBC Broadcasts Dead Air – Twice – As Literally Speechless Election Analyst Learns Results Are Missing from 5 of 9 USB Drives in Blue City
Mamdani’s luxury-home tax gets new life as appeals court lifts roadblock in homeowner fight
Fox News Poll: A Senate battle looms in Michigan
A Democratic senator wanted to ban super PACs in primaries. Now he’s benefiting from one
Steve Hilton gains ground in California governor’s race but Becerra maintains lead: Poll
State Department abolishes ‘ideologically extreme and discriminatory’ DEI policies in Foreign Service
Zelensky’s missile plea shows dire state of Ukraine’s war machine
Blanche praises career DOJ staff and vows to leave agency better ‘than when I found it’
Scope of CCP-backed Chinese exchange program inside American schools uncovered in sweeping report
Over 100,000 Canadians sign petition for the removal of US ambassador
Karoline Leavitt Made the Right Decision, And More Young Women Should Follow Her Example
Dem Senate nominee admits ‘I take responsibility’ after police report alleges he broke down door, punched man
Studio That Helped Build Hollywood Considers Leaving California Due to Actions of Gavin Newsom Admin
Luigi Mangione expected to plead guilty in federal case
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
