On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
It’s Happening: CA Revival Extends for Weeks, ‘Greatest Nights’ in Over 50 Years of Evangelist’s Crusades
Parents Sue Snapchat Alleging Its Responsibility For 12-Year-Old’s Rape
Young Americans break sharply from older Americans on China threat, new poll finds
SNAP food stamp fraud has nefarious terrorism links, top Agriculture watchdog warns Congress
Englishman Visits America For World Cup, Meets Trump: ‘I Now Understand The American Dream’
Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter
Congress is struggling to get its work done and a new report argues for 21st-century upgrades
Nigel Farage squirms in spotlight as British press hounds him over £5M ‘gift’ from crypto billionaire
AOC puts major tech company on notice amid looming price increases: ‘Far too big’
Massie lashes out when pressed on ex-girlfriend’s allegations of affair with GOP firebrand
Bill Clinton reveals how he feels about upcoming midterms after socialist victories
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Parents take schools to court, drag queen school board member arrested
Man dead, another critical after double stabbing at Brooklyn park as police detain person of interest: NYPD
Trump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory
Louisiana Democrats pick rural farmer to challenge GOP in uphill Senate bid
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
