On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Breaking: ‘Explosion’ at Quaker Oats Factory Rocks Midwest City as Large Smoke Cloud Looms
Obama compares Trump’s White House renovations to ‘Saddam Hussein opening a Cheesecake Factory’ at Ohio rally
Trump’s go-to Michigan auto worker gets a job and the spotlight
Felon Accused of Shooting National Guardsman Slapped With Federal Charges
This Isn’t Want Dems Had in Mind: Cali’s Wealth Tax Plan Handed Billionaire Zuckerberg a Massive Pay Increase
Did He Forget About 9/11? Muslim Brotherhood-Connected El-Sayed Said US Was ‘A Lot More Safe’ Under INS
Second Amendment fight moves beyond guns with Supreme Court poised for big ruling
Bush dynasty delivers another blow to GOP in Texas Senate battle as family member breaks ranks
Breaking: US Evacuates Middle East in ‘Sudden Exodus’ as ‘Advanced Stages’ of Iranian Assassination Plots Come to Light
Obama prepares to rally with Michigan Dem who once delivered scathing verdict on his presidency
Omar’s deleted tweet could give clue on alleged brother marriage
Trump’s war on drug cartels could gain powerful new ally after pivotal election
Missouri businesswoman and single mom killed when police SUV responding to emergency crashes into her Audi
Cornell rape accuser can remain ‘Jane Doe’ as judge warns threats could lead to federal charges
The parties have flipped on support for Israel
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
