On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Trump and Musk share ‘lovely dinner’ at Mar-a-Lago after public feuding
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s narco case echoes US history of targeting alleged foreign drug kingpins
The Obama, Biden War on Coal Created an Energy Crisis: Trump’s Policies Are Already Fixing it
Trump issues direct warning to Venezuela’s new leader Delcy Rodríguez following Maduro capture
Now That’s a Low Blow: MTG Accuses Trump of Being a Fake Christian
Dems Push Beth Macy as the Liberal Answer to JD Vance, Say She’s ‘What Vance Could Have Been’
Bible Sales Skyrocket in 2025, Massive Spike Following Charlie Kirk’s Murder
American jailed for billionaire’s Monaco death, plot to kill wife exposed in long con, expert says
Venezuela still owes US energy companies billions as Trump calls for new investment
Elected Democrat Busted Breaking Into a Car, Charged with Burglary
CIA Launched a Christmas Eve Strike Inside Venezuela: Report
Venezuelan government reasserts control over Caracas after Maduro arrest
Dan Bongino officially leaves FBI deputy director role after less than a year, returns to ‘civilian life’
Legal Analyst: Dems’ Trump Lawsuits Were ‘Smorgasbord of Stupid’ That Gave Him a Massive Advantage
Tech-savvy thieves exploit obits, online posts to strike homes while families grieve, expert warns
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
