On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Guatemalan national indicted for allegedly smuggling teen girl into the US
Leaders in AOC’s ‘Red Light’ district call on Kash Patel to crush ‘worsening’ gang crime and prostitution
Colorado lawmaker latest Democrat to visit El Salvador for deported illegal migrant Abrego Garcia
Watch: Deputies on Dark Stretch of Road See Death Coming and Expertly Dodge It
American Revolution Begins With the ‘Shot Heard ‘Round The World’ 250 Years Ago
What is REAL ID? Deadline approaches for new identification cards required to fly domestically
Supreme Court sets stage for possible crackdown on nationwide injunctions
Canada’s preelection question: Who can stand up to Donald Trump?
Oklahoma City bombing survivor was ‘getting ready to die’ after being trapped in 10 feet of rubble
Menendez brothers could get freedom under California law signed by Gavin Newsom: expert
GOP push to make Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanent, say going back would be a ‘dramatic’ change for many
Supreme Court blocks new deportations of Venezuelans in Texas under 18th century Alien Enemies Act
Jasmine Crockett mocks Laken Riley Act, trolls MAGA in wake of FSU shooting
Beloved family men identified as victims killed in FSU mass shooting: ‘Living a nightmare’
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Of Angel Moms and Illegals
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
