On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Susie Wiles reveals brutal toll of fighting cancer while running Trump’s White House
Woman found dead with unexplained trauma in Central Park as NYPD searches for answers
John Fetterman accidentally calls himself a ‘lifelong Republican’ at Texas Tribune Festival
University Scrubbed Pentagon-Funded Professor’s Ties to CCP: Report
SCOTUS Climate Suit Could Devastate Family Farms, Give China and Russia an Edge: Expert
Ozempic Maker Teams Up with Big AI for New Drug Development
Breaking: ‘They Were Looking to Do Big Damage’ – Trump Speaks Out on Terror Plot as Photo of Suspects Goes Viral
Texas voters have plenty to say about whether Lone Star State could turn blue
‘Palestinian Rachel Dolezal’: Woke Activist Exposed for Faking Black-Arab Racial Identity – She’s White
Texas clinic owner convicted in $26M military health fraud tied to gold-plated Cybertruck
Trump DOJ Sues California City for Jacking Up Gun Permits, Pricing Citizens Out of Their 2A Rights
Irish PM rejects antisemitism concerns in Ireland amid dramatic vote over boycotting Israel game
Tim Tebow Announces He’s ‘Pausing’ Relationship with Christian Group Targeted by Liberal Reporter
Trump Terminates ‘Ridiculous’ Biden-Buttigieg EV Mandate with Sweeping New Fuel Standards
Trump’s Greenland obsession isn’t random. Here’s what’s at stake
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
