Uncategorized

Schiff: Dems Wanted ‘Whistleblower’ to Testify Until Trump Put ‘Life in Danger’

On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.

Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”


Judge and wife shot in broad daylight in Indiana, sparking massive multi-agency investigation
Trump says media focuses too much on Minnesota ICE coverage, not enough on corruption allegations
Maryland Democrat’s bill seeks to ‘digitally unmask’ ICE agents after fatal Minneapolis shooting
Bill Cassidy challenger digs in against Trump’s preferred GOP Senate candidate  
Florida repeat offender allegedly killed 3 tourists minutes from Magic Kingdom after run of violence: records
ISIS fighters reportedly escape from Kurdish prisons amid fighting with government
Piers Morgan Hospitalized After Suffering Serious Injury at Restaurant
UN chief accuses US of ditching international law as Trump blasts global bodies
Oops: Leader of Anti-ICE Church Invasion Just Made Prosecutors’ Job a Lot Easier
Bruce Springsteen Pauses Concert to Deliver Vulgar Anti-ICE Message
Watch: US National Anthem Heckled at London NBA Game
Prominent Catholic bishop slams anti-ICE agitators who disrupted MN church service: ‘Unacceptable’
William Shatner backs Stephen Miller’s Star Trek criticism: ‘Ready to assume command’
Anti-ICE agitators disrupt Minnesota church, shout down worshippers during Sunday service
Retired South Carolina couple found dead in homicides at home


He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”

He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”

See also  Watch: Renee Good's Former Father-in-Law Refuses to Take CNN's Bait, Quotes the Bible Instead

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter