On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Alaska woman uses weapon to survive terrifying bear attack after predator mauls pooch: ‘I thought I was dead’
Son of Mango fashion billionaire heard tearfully telling 911 operator his father had ‘fallen down a ravine’
Vance Gives Perfect Response After ‘View’ Host Brings Up His Past Criticism of Trump
Republicans bat down bid to handcuff Trump’s war powers as peace deal nears
15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations
JD Vance Responds as Lindsey Graham Expresses Skepticism About Iran Deal
Mother’s tip helped unravel White House UFC drone plot: Affidavit
Lawmakers demand answers after NIH scientists charged in monkeypox smuggling conspiracy
MLB Reprimands Christian Players Who Took a Stand Against ‘Pride Night’
Todd Blanche earns attorney general bid endorsement from law enforcement alliance ahead of confirmation
Trump Says Israel Is Fighting ‘Too Long, and Too Many People Are Being Killed’
Hungary changes constitution to ban Viktor Orban reelection as Peter Magyar prepares to oust president
Report links anti-Christian extremism and ‘assassination culture’ to alleged plot against Erika Kirk
Luigi Mangione supporter working for far-left DC mayoral candidate likened to Mamdani
South Carolina personal trainer goes missing, last spotted walking toward wooded area
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
