On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Trump-linked super PAC pulls funding from 2 House Republicans as GOP fights to keep majority
Isaias aftermath brings arrests after suspects allegedly trick woman into letting them in car, store looted
911 operators questioned whether Christa Pike failed execution call was prank, audio reveals
Trump asks Kimberly Guilfoyle to resign as Greece ambassador, White House confirms
Alleged Philadelphia Cop Killer Admits He Targeted White Officers – Would Not Have Shot Black Cops
Trump rally crowd chants ‘deport’ as president rips Ilhan Omar after federal raid
Trump vanishes from GOP senator’s campaign website as poll numbers plunge weeks before election
AI Is Replacing Doctors Already: Utah Just Let an AI Write a Medical Prescription for the First Time
Biden Admin Used Threats to Silence Parents from Speaking Out Against Woke Policies, Teaching: DOJ Report
Ilhan Omar immigration history: Scrutiny surrounds family’s refugee claims
Republicans eye Wes Moore’s redistricting measure to boost GOP in blue Maryland
Kimberly Guilfoyle faces potential Senate probe over bombshell $100K allegation
Booker ‘wowed’ by GOP challenger’s blunt message to Trump
Rob Sand seeks red-state blueprint for Democrats in Iowa
US military archbishop urges Catholic soldiers to refuse involvement in Army firing squad execution
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
