On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Trump admin sued by New York, New Jersey over Hudson River tunnel funding freeze: ‘See you in court’
White House approves Medal of Honor for fallen Army Staff Sgt Michael Ollis after years-long push
Lawmakers probe National FFA over Chinese Communist Party ties and DEI programs
Mamdani calls on DA to not prosecute mentally ill man shot by police during knife attack
Reps. Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett Drop SAVE Act Demands After Meeting with Trump
Trump reacts to NBC host Savannah Guthrie’s mother Nancy’s mysterious abduction
Op-Ed: Trump is a Performer – Let Him Perform
California business group unveils Times Square billboard comparing Newsom to NY Jets during Super Bowl week
Trump shames CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for not smiling when asking president about Epstein survivors
Mike Johnson backs ‘America Is Back!’ message as Trump debuts new hat design
These are the 21 House Republicans who held out against Trump, Johnson on $1.2T spending bill
Jill Biden’s Ex-Husband Charged with Murder
Breaking: Apparent Ransom Note Emerges in Nancy Guthrie Disappearance
Video: Ana Navarro on ‘The View’ Launches Unhinged, Incoherent Attack Against ‘Cross-Wearing’ Christians She Doesn’t Like
Kristi Noem Issues Blistering Response to ‘Ill-Informed Famous Musicians’ Who Attacked ICE at Grammys
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
