On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
2028 Dem hopeful’s longtime ally exposed for deep ties to CCP officials: ‘Good friends’
GOP mail-in voting proposal could impact millions of Americans ahead of midterms
DOJ threatens to cut billions in welfare funding from states for failing to report illegal migrants
Pentagon orders mandatory testosterone tests for male troops 30 and older
Social media is Lindsay Clancy wild card that could tilt potential retrial to the defense, retired judge says
US military boards, searches and sinks vessel allegedly supporting Los Choneros narco-terrorists
15-year-old accused of firing into crowd during deadly Seattle mass shooting claims self-defense
Maine’s high court gives father final say over daughter’s church attendance
FAA seeks permanent airspace restrictions near Trump’s Mar-a-Lago as expert warns rules are ‘not good enough’
Watch: Black Entrepreneur Humiliates Jemele Hill on CNN After She Claims Capitalism and White Supremacy Are Connected
The primary is over; now come the primetime mistakes
Trump Clarifies Stakes of Texas Senate Battle: If Talarico Wins, ‘I Will Be the Last Republican President’
Blue state creates six-figure role for trans inmate services amid budget shortfalls
Vance’s mom fires back at El-Sayed over second family jabs: ‘Probably punch him’
Breaking: Mass Shooting in Downtown Minneapolis, Civilian Killed, Officers Shot
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
