On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Justice Department charges 16 across multiple states with alleged illegal voting, election crimes
Breaking: US Issues Security Alert as Trump Rushes to WH Days After Saying US Could Soon ‘Annihilate’ Iranian Regime
Messianic Rabbi Jonathan Cahn Says His Viral ‘Duct Tape Man’ Encounter Echoes ‘Revelation’ About Evil in His Latest Book
New Jersey mom charged with obstruction after ‘missing’ son found hiding in her crawl space
NORAD F-16 intercepts aircraft that violated restricted airspace over Camp David with Trump present: officials
DSA Democrats Praise This ‘Socialist Model’ – Communist Cuba’s Power Grid Collapses
Watch: MAGA Takes Victory Lap as CNN Is Forced to Read Trump’s WH Ban on Air
Newsom signs bills to prevent Trump from ‘dictatorial control’ over California elections
Shocking Reports of Dog Torture Emerge from Major LA Homeless Encampment
Trump announces new ‘AI Force,’ vows to protect industry as AI czar announcement nears
Solid-Blue Oregon Suddenly Looks Flippable as a New Poll Puts the Governor’s Race in Toss-Up Range
Who is Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan?
Specific Utah Law Could Derail Charlie Kirk Family’s Wrongful Death Case: Legal Experts
Riyadh airport explosion prompts Saudi Arabia to issue air raid alerts as Houthi fighting escalates
Yes, They Do Exist: Ken Paxton Shuts Down Chinese Birth Tourism Center in Texas
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
