On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Powell reveals what it would take to step down from the Fed as pressure mounts
Trump pledges to uncover leftist groups countering ICE
Rubio Announced Major Shift in Foreign Aid Strategy Ahead of Venezuela Moves
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell Under Criminal Investigation
Seattle order to stop drug arrests ‘creating havoc’ for people fending off addicts surviving on theft: expert
LA protesters swarm U-Haul truck that drove through anti-Iranian regime gathering
Inside the lightning US strike that overwhelmed Venezuela’s defenses and seized Maduro
Alleged J6 Pipe Bomber Pleads Not Guilty After Reportedly Saying He Did it to Defend Biden’s Election Win
J6 Officer Praised By the Media Appears to Call for Violence Against ICE Agents
US raid in Venezuela signals deterrence to adversaries on three fronts, experts say
Meet Aaron Day, the 2016 spoiler who could sink Senate GOP hopes in New Hampshire
Rand Paul says Trump’s threat to bomb Iran ‘is not the answer’: Not the ‘job of the American government’
San Antonio ends its abortion travel fund after new state law, legal action
Los Angeles wildfire recovery enters second year as frustration and uncertainty linger
Smithsonian replaces Trump portrait display, strips Jan. 6 and impeachment references from accompanying text
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
