On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Musk: Austin Shooter Was Fired by Tesla After He Struck Woman Who ‘Accidentally Stepped on His Prayer Rug’
Over 100 arrested in California after $2 billion state-federal healthcare fraud crackdowns
Fox News Poll: Nail-biter in Maine Senate race
Man accused of smashing Iwo Jima statue with sledgehammer in Quantico
Trump rally exposes surprising cracks in MAGA base as Republicans face midterm test
Watch: Mike Rogers Stops Abdul El-Sayed in His Tracks When He Attempts ‘Victim’ Strategy During Debate
Italy and Spain end border crisis sparked by Ceuta invasion, but approximately 15,000 migrants still demand asylum
Dozens Taken to Hospital, Days-Long Evacuation in Effect as Massive Chemical Leak Plagues Ohio City
Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Slapped Down by Judge For Trying to Investigate Holdout Juror and Examine His Phone
Ilhan Omar is not the Minnesota congresswoman’s ‘real name’: sources
Australia pastor case ‘canary in the coal mine’ for American Christian freedoms: TPUSA leader
Federal authorities charge 15 in massive $1.8B Southern California medical fraud sweep
Accused Philadelphia cop killer Eric Lewis faces new federal gun, robbery charges after deadly ambush
Macron returns to Paris on war footing to quash ‘illegitimate’ riots he blames on ‘organized ultra-left groups’
Mamdani expected to face legal trouble over PETA-backed horse carriage ban
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
