On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Michigan Senate hopeful calls AIPAC donations ‘legalized bribery,’ remains silent on other donations
Trump Admin Knocks Out Radically Woke ‘Equal Opportunity’ Rule, Makes It Much Harder to Sue Over Racism and Win
As the Hearing Wraps, Let’s Remember Charlie Kirk for the Modern-Day Thomas Paine That He Was
How Maine’s Democratic meltdown could shape the Senate midterms
White House considers plan to build permanent fencing around Lafayette Park
Man arrested on suspicion of murdering British politician Ann Widdecombe
Erika Kirk urges judge to clear path quickly for Tyler Robinson murder trial
Biden Immigrant Trucker from Muslim Country Reportedly Rammed, Killed College Soccer Goalie – Had to Use Translation App to Talk with Cops
Trump Tells Reporter Iran Will Pay Dearly if He is Assassinated: ‘I’ve Left Instructions’
Intel expert says Singham network is more than a nonprofit scandal—it’s a security threat
Cause of death revealed for American mother murdered in Ireland: report
NJ husband begs for CPR help in 911 call after wife found dead with stab wounds: audio
New Trump UFO file dump includes military footage of mysterious star-shaped object
Graphic: Another Muslim Activist Freaks Out, Demanding We Confine Our Dogs According to the Will of Allah
Video Emerges Showing Mitch McConnell Taken to Hospital After Cardiac Arrest – Report
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
