On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Trump touts ‘golden age’ at Ohio rally, urges voters to deliver GOP midterm wins
Cornell president says university ‘must do better’ on handling of sexual assault allegations
South Carolina mom couldn’t remember last time she fed 2 daughters before they were found dead: affidavit
Another One: College Prof, Ex-Dem Candidate Arrested After His DNA Found in 15-Year-Old’s Rape Kit, Cops Say
Education Dept. Goes Viral with Takedown of ‘Fake News’ Story on Loan Cuts: No More Handouts for Failing Degrees
Even Healthcare Workers Are Dropping Health Coverage as Obamacare Premiums Hit New Heights
Trump drops Republican Senator’s phone number in social post over fury on stalled bill
Republicans Pour Unprecedented Amounts of Money Defending Seats Trump Won by Double Digits
Spencer Pratt Reveals the Secret Behind His Viral Campaign Ads – And What Every Other Politician Is Doing Wrong
Tennessee prison chief resigns after failed execution as former US attorney tapped to lead independent review
Firebrand GOP rep: Democrats side with Iran ‘simply because they hate’ Trump
Mass Migration Devastated California’s Natural Resources Over Decades: Study
Springsteen, other stars share stage with hardcore leftist groups at music fest
Jack Smith Might Have Your Banking Info if You Supported Trump
Ebola Explodes in Africa Much Faster Than Infamous 2010s Outbreak
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
