Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
ICE involved in shooting after agency says illegal immigrant gang member tried to ram officer
Massachusetts mom offers to admit killing 3 children as prosecutors push back on move that could dodge prison
Blanche rolls out fraud crackdown in first remarks since Bondi ouster
Trump Iran threat sparks calls for his ouster, but one Dem says effort ‘not realistic’
Report: ‘Positive’ Development in US-Iran Talks as Clock Ticks Toward Deadline
Trump’s threat to end Iranian ‘civilization’ sparks uproar on Capitol Hill
Trump DOJ Says Not So Fast as Mamdani Announces ‘Racial Equity Plan’
Byron Allen’s Comics Unleashed to replace Stephen Colbert on CBS next month
Trump calls into Vance-Orban Hungary event: ‘My kind of people’
Ex-Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene joins left-wing calls for the 25th amendment as Iran deadline nears
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Floats New Tactic for Cracking Down on Sanctuary Cities
MTG cites 25th Amendment as she calls out Trump over Iran
Daughter of missing American woman in Bahamas says there were ‘prior issues,’ calls for full investigation
Aaron Rupar, Trump-Obsessed Lib Clip Farmer, Gets Glowing Profile From One of UK’s Most Prestigious Papers
Indianapolis official’s home attacked after vote in favor of controversial data center
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
ICE involved in shooting after agency says illegal immigrant gang member tried to ram officer
Massachusetts mom offers to admit killing 3 children as prosecutors push back on move that could dodge prison
Blanche rolls out fraud crackdown in first remarks since Bondi ouster
Trump Iran threat sparks calls for his ouster, but one Dem says effort ‘not realistic’
Report: ‘Positive’ Development in US-Iran Talks as Clock Ticks Toward Deadline
Trump’s threat to end Iranian ‘civilization’ sparks uproar on Capitol Hill
Trump DOJ Says Not So Fast as Mamdani Announces ‘Racial Equity Plan’
Byron Allen’s Comics Unleashed to replace Stephen Colbert on CBS next month
Trump calls into Vance-Orban Hungary event: ‘My kind of people’
Ex-Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene joins left-wing calls for the 25th amendment as Iran deadline nears
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Floats New Tactic for Cracking Down on Sanctuary Cities
MTG cites 25th Amendment as she calls out Trump over Iran
Daughter of missing American woman in Bahamas says there were ‘prior issues,’ calls for full investigation
Aaron Rupar, Trump-Obsessed Lib Clip Farmer, Gets Glowing Profile From One of UK’s Most Prestigious Papers
Indianapolis official’s home attacked after vote in favor of controversial data center
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
