Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
Delcy Rodríguez considering visit to US after meeting with energy secretary
Senate Democrats weigh skipping Trump State of the Union address
Possible tattoo seen in Nancy Guthrie video may help ID subject, former profiler says
House Passes SAVE Act: Only One Democrat Voted for Proof of Citizenship in US Elections
Homan announces Operation Metro Surge to conclude in Minnesota
DEI, climate agenda advanced through progressive-backed lawsuits, new report claims
Nancy Mace Says She’s Seen Unredacted Epstein List, Which Shields ‘Prime Ministers’ and ‘Former Presidents’
Florida man suspected of killing 6 in shooting spree at 2 residences identified
GOP leaders want Trump to endorse Cornyn in Texas Senate primary amid fears of costly fight
House Republican Greg Steube introduces bill to nix controversial H-1B visa program
Minivan mom puts Dem incumbent on notice in top GOP target district: ‘She has done nothing for us’
Gabbard ends task force that aimed to reform intelligence gathering after less than a year
Florida man allegedly points gun at multiple drivers during road rage confrontation
IRS erroneously shared confidential immigrant taxpayer data with DHS: court filing
Federal Judge releases four illegal immigrants convicted of murder, sex crimes from ICE Custody
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
Delcy Rodríguez considering visit to US after meeting with energy secretary
Senate Democrats weigh skipping Trump State of the Union address
Possible tattoo seen in Nancy Guthrie video may help ID subject, former profiler says
House Passes SAVE Act: Only One Democrat Voted for Proof of Citizenship in US Elections
Homan announces Operation Metro Surge to conclude in Minnesota
DEI, climate agenda advanced through progressive-backed lawsuits, new report claims
Nancy Mace Says She’s Seen Unredacted Epstein List, Which Shields ‘Prime Ministers’ and ‘Former Presidents’
Florida man suspected of killing 6 in shooting spree at 2 residences identified
GOP leaders want Trump to endorse Cornyn in Texas Senate primary amid fears of costly fight
House Republican Greg Steube introduces bill to nix controversial H-1B visa program
Minivan mom puts Dem incumbent on notice in top GOP target district: ‘She has done nothing for us’
Gabbard ends task force that aimed to reform intelligence gathering after less than a year
Florida man allegedly points gun at multiple drivers during road rage confrontation
IRS erroneously shared confidential immigrant taxpayer data with DHS: court filing
Federal Judge releases four illegal immigrants convicted of murder, sex crimes from ICE Custody
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
