Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
Army of Radical Prosecutors All Have One Thing in Common
Trump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
Hakeem Jeffries Tells Activist Audience DEI Is Explicitly Written Into Constitution
ICE detains relatives of 1979 Iran hostage crisis figure after Rubio revokes their legal status
Photos show Athena Strand kidnapping truck as jurors weigh death penalty for killer FedEx driver
Coast Guard Confiscates Over $33 Million of Cocaine in Major Bust
Swalwell ripped for changing his tune on how sexual assault victims ‘deserve to be heard’
WATCH: Eviction standoff turns war zone as gunman kills deputy in ambush, gets run over by armored vehicle
Top White House officials encouraged potential Bondi replacement to make case to Trump for AG job: Sources
Trump Demands Fox News Take ‘Real Loser’ Host off the Air
Swalwell’s baggage on full display as California governor bid hits turbulence
Fairfax County schools retain copious cultural observance days out of ‘diversity’ concerns
‘A National Embarrassment’: Kamala Harris Mocked for Incredibly Bizarre Trump Impression
Trump adversary running for Senate borrows his filibuster playbook
‘Quiet!’ Trump Snaps at ‘Failing’ NYT Reporter After War Crimes Question
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
Army of Radical Prosecutors All Have One Thing in Common
Trump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
Hakeem Jeffries Tells Activist Audience DEI Is Explicitly Written Into Constitution
ICE detains relatives of 1979 Iran hostage crisis figure after Rubio revokes their legal status
Photos show Athena Strand kidnapping truck as jurors weigh death penalty for killer FedEx driver
Coast Guard Confiscates Over $33 Million of Cocaine in Major Bust
Swalwell ripped for changing his tune on how sexual assault victims ‘deserve to be heard’
WATCH: Eviction standoff turns war zone as gunman kills deputy in ambush, gets run over by armored vehicle
Top White House officials encouraged potential Bondi replacement to make case to Trump for AG job: Sources
Trump Demands Fox News Take ‘Real Loser’ Host off the Air
Swalwell’s baggage on full display as California governor bid hits turbulence
Fairfax County schools retain copious cultural observance days out of ‘diversity’ concerns
‘A National Embarrassment’: Kamala Harris Mocked for Incredibly Bizarre Trump Impression
Trump adversary running for Senate borrows his filibuster playbook
‘Quiet!’ Trump Snaps at ‘Failing’ NYT Reporter After War Crimes Question
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
