Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
Woman wearing burka escorted out of Florida county meeting after playing call to prayer recording
Manhattan 9/11 Memorial Desecrated by Anti-Second Amendment Radical
Dem AG’s ‘too many golf courses’ remark goes viral as critics tee off
Police Arrest 3 They Say Planned to Carry Out Mass Shooting at Georgia High School
Fifteen charged in DC drug bust for transnational meth and GBL trafficking ring
Dueling rallies thrust deep-red Lone Star town into the center of the political universe
FBI reports 67% jump in violent crime arrests under Trump compared to Biden’s final months
Mary Peltola and ‘Decoy Dan’ Sullivan face collusion accusations as DOJ investigates Alaska Senate campaign
Hochul reveals which election result would make her job ‘a lot easier’ — and it’s not her own
DOJ fires back at Dem AG over Election Day guidance telling officials when to call cops on federal agents
Breaking: Evidence Indicates Democrats Intentionally ‘Stacked’ the Ballot in Key Senate Race
Judge overseeing Maduro case dies at 92
How House Democrats revamped their college outreach in a bid to win back youth voters
Former Federal Immigration Judge Has Tough News for ‘Ilhan Omar’ – A Statute of Limitations Won’t Save Her
Rubio called back to the campaign trail after Texas visit
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
Woman wearing burka escorted out of Florida county meeting after playing call to prayer recording
Manhattan 9/11 Memorial Desecrated by Anti-Second Amendment Radical
Dem AG’s ‘too many golf courses’ remark goes viral as critics tee off
Police Arrest 3 They Say Planned to Carry Out Mass Shooting at Georgia High School
Fifteen charged in DC drug bust for transnational meth and GBL trafficking ring
Dueling rallies thrust deep-red Lone Star town into the center of the political universe
FBI reports 67% jump in violent crime arrests under Trump compared to Biden’s final months
Mary Peltola and ‘Decoy Dan’ Sullivan face collusion accusations as DOJ investigates Alaska Senate campaign
Hochul reveals which election result would make her job ‘a lot easier’ — and it’s not her own
DOJ fires back at Dem AG over Election Day guidance telling officials when to call cops on federal agents
Breaking: Evidence Indicates Democrats Intentionally ‘Stacked’ the Ballot in Key Senate Race
Judge overseeing Maduro case dies at 92
How House Democrats revamped their college outreach in a bid to win back youth voters
Former Federal Immigration Judge Has Tough News for ‘Ilhan Omar’ – A Statute of Limitations Won’t Save Her
Rubio called back to the campaign trail after Texas visit
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
