Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
Court checks Pritzker as Trump administration scores another immigration win
Biden judge blocking Ethiopian deportations despite SCOTUS ruling clashed with ICE before
Fewer Gay Professionals Feel Being Gay Helps Their Career
Trump defends New York Times subpoenas as judge seeks internal DOJ communications
State Officials Blamed Citizens for Death of Bear Stuck Atop Power Pole, but What Bystander Says She Saw Changes Everything
Maine Democrats crown Troy Jackson as Platner replacement as fresh scrutiny clouds Senate reset
Pentagon Official Calls Ex-White House AI Architect ‘Village Idiot’ in China Policy Spat
ICE Deports Ex-NFL Linebacker and Rugby Star: Report
Brian Hooker’s stepmom wants to help investigators as she suspects he ‘lied about everything’: reports
Letitia James faces scrutiny after New York City spends $81,700 per homeless person amid shelter scandals
Hawaii’s Democratic lieutenant governor indicted in state corruption investigation
What happened to Michelle Hadley? 5 things to know about ‘A Toxic Love Story’ case
GOP’s freshman firebrand goes viral targeting ‘utterly intellectually indefensible’ DEI policies
Uyghur Pastor in China Faces Forced Church Closure from Communist Officials
Trump revels in his first WHCA dinner speech despite serious tone and tight security
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
Court checks Pritzker as Trump administration scores another immigration win
Biden judge blocking Ethiopian deportations despite SCOTUS ruling clashed with ICE before
Fewer Gay Professionals Feel Being Gay Helps Their Career
Trump defends New York Times subpoenas as judge seeks internal DOJ communications
State Officials Blamed Citizens for Death of Bear Stuck Atop Power Pole, but What Bystander Says She Saw Changes Everything
Maine Democrats crown Troy Jackson as Platner replacement as fresh scrutiny clouds Senate reset
Pentagon Official Calls Ex-White House AI Architect ‘Village Idiot’ in China Policy Spat
ICE Deports Ex-NFL Linebacker and Rugby Star: Report
Brian Hooker’s stepmom wants to help investigators as she suspects he ‘lied about everything’: reports
Letitia James faces scrutiny after New York City spends $81,700 per homeless person amid shelter scandals
Hawaii’s Democratic lieutenant governor indicted in state corruption investigation
What happened to Michelle Hadley? 5 things to know about ‘A Toxic Love Story’ case
GOP’s freshman firebrand goes viral targeting ‘utterly intellectually indefensible’ DEI policies
Uyghur Pastor in China Faces Forced Church Closure from Communist Officials
Trump revels in his first WHCA dinner speech despite serious tone and tight security
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
