Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
Trump Admin Considers Sending Large Payments to Every Greenland Resident in Bid to Acquire the Island: Report
First Hilton, Then Marriot, Now McDonald’s: Companies Rush to Embrace ICE as Conservative Pressure Campaign Crushes Woke Workers
‘Tip of the iceberg’: Senate Republicans press Gov Walz over Minnesota fraud scandal
Democratic socialist Mamdani ally mounts bid for US House of Representatives
Ohio dentist murders: Alley video, no forced entry fuel insider fears, experts say
Renee Nicole Good part of ‘ICE Watch’ group, DHS sources say
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
Trump Admin Considers Sending Large Payments to Every Greenland Resident in Bid to Acquire the Island: Report
First Hilton, Then Marriot, Now McDonald’s: Companies Rush to Embrace ICE as Conservative Pressure Campaign Crushes Woke Workers
‘Tip of the iceberg’: Senate Republicans press Gov Walz over Minnesota fraud scandal
Democratic socialist Mamdani ally mounts bid for US House of Representatives
Ohio dentist murders: Alley video, no forced entry fuel insider fears, experts say
Renee Nicole Good part of ‘ICE Watch’ group, DHS sources say
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
