Appearing Friday on the Fox News Channel, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) revealed House Democrats are still withholding transcripts of depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee inside Congress’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) as part of their impeachment inquiry.
Trump orders DOJ probe into Democrats over alleged threats against admin officials
Biden-appointed judge probes whether ICE skirted judge’s release orders in Colorado cases
Salon Signs Off: The Truth Outlasts the Smear
Newsom’s death-row commutations spark DA revolt as prosecutors warn of legal fight
Turning Point USA event at University of New Mexico ends with two arrests and a string of charges
The Left’s Joe Rogan Can’t Stop Laughing at Twisted Charlie Kirk Execution Fantasy
Slew of Arrests For Newly Elected Democrats Across the Country, Some Could Face Years in Jail
White House Slammed for Tone-Deaf Post About ‘Triumphal Arch’ Following Midterm Bloodbath
9 mystery fingerprints from OJ Simpson murder case could hold new clues more than 30 years later
Republican state lawmakers reported Omar to the IRS in 2019
Far Worse Than Previously Reported: Big Tech’s Ticking Time Bomb Is a Massive Financial Exposure Tied to AI
Second Amendment Declared ‘Extinct’ in SCOTUS Brief Over Gun Ban
Democratic senator-elect calls Trump ‘unserious fool’ while defending combative political style
How potential Republican 2028 candidates are reacting to the midterm elections
GOP eyes Senate comeback after Democratic bloodbath, but another political nightmare could await
A partial transcript is as follows;
ANCHOR: Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have said they are waiting on these articles to ensure there’s a fair trial in the Senate, but there have been a lot of other theories floated by Republicans, by folks from the other side of the aisle that think that Nancy Pelosi is stalling for all sorts of reasons. So I want to get your thoughts on why these articles are being held.
REP. MICHAEL BURGESS: My first take is that they’re holding the articles of impeachment because they really had nothing in the first place, so if they send them to the Senate and it crashes and burns, the president is exonerated and they did not accomplish what they set out to accomplish, which was to politically harm the president at the beginning of a political year.
ANCHOR: So you think they’re stalling, in essence, to continue digging, that they’re hoping they find something more?
Trump orders DOJ probe into Democrats over alleged threats against admin officials
Biden-appointed judge probes whether ICE skirted judge’s release orders in Colorado cases
Salon Signs Off: The Truth Outlasts the Smear
Newsom’s death-row commutations spark DA revolt as prosecutors warn of legal fight
Turning Point USA event at University of New Mexico ends with two arrests and a string of charges
The Left’s Joe Rogan Can’t Stop Laughing at Twisted Charlie Kirk Execution Fantasy
Slew of Arrests For Newly Elected Democrats Across the Country, Some Could Face Years in Jail
White House Slammed for Tone-Deaf Post About ‘Triumphal Arch’ Following Midterm Bloodbath
9 mystery fingerprints from OJ Simpson murder case could hold new clues more than 30 years later
Republican state lawmakers reported Omar to the IRS in 2019
Far Worse Than Previously Reported: Big Tech’s Ticking Time Bomb Is a Massive Financial Exposure Tied to AI
Second Amendment Declared ‘Extinct’ in SCOTUS Brief Over Gun Ban
Democratic senator-elect calls Trump ‘unserious fool’ while defending combative political style
How potential Republican 2028 candidates are reacting to the midterm elections
GOP eyes Senate comeback after Democratic bloodbath, but another political nightmare could await
REP. BURGESS: Look, they had all the tools at their disposal on the House side, they made it secret. They had armed guards outside the doors. They still haven’t made all of the transcripts available to members of Congress. And according to House rules, any committee hearing, the transcript is supposed to be available to other House members. But they have not done so, and no one has asserted that these are classified briefings. They were just simply secret hearings because it behooved the speaker to have secret hearings. That doesn’t pass muster. That’s not a constitutional part of the process.
Story cited here.
