CDC Director: Coronavirus Death Toll Will Be ‘Much, Much, Much Lower’ than Projected

HOST: We were talking about some of the models, whether it’s from the imperial college guy in England or the University of Washington. Thank god some of these numbers are falling short of some of these catastrophic numbers. Tell me about the dynamic of the modeling and how it helps and influences decision making and then, when the reality comes in, how does the decision making transform?

DR. ROBERT REDFIELD: I think it’s really important. First, models are only as good as their assumptions. Obviously, there was a lot unknown about this virus. The ability to actively make a lot of assumptions was much wider than if this was an Influenza B outbreak. Second thing, I will say from a public health perspective, to me, the real value of models is to have a model and then try to understand — if I invest resources here, what does that do to the model? If I invest in intervention strategies here, what does that do to the model? It’s a way of beta testing how you’re going to respond and what it does to the different models. And models should never be used to assume that we have a number. You saw those numbers are quite staggering. You’ve got 200,000 to 2 million Americans are losing their lives before the fall. That’s a pretty staggering number.

HOST: Are throwing those kind of numbers out actually helpful because what they do is scare the hell out of everyone to social distance? Is that the purpose?

---

Marine Le Pen’s last stand: National Rally leader polling far ahead for 2027 presidential election after three previous defeats

---

Grand Canyon flash flood leaves 1 dead and several missing or unaccounted for, park service says

---

Duffy teases ‘unprecedented fraud crackdown’ announcement with DHS, DOJ

---

Accused NC killer mom plans insanity defense — as retired judge says more may follow Lindsay Clancy strategy

---

Beloved Texas chiropractor, hiking group among those unaccounted for after Grand Canyon flash flood

---

California mom has both legs amputated after suspected impaired driver plows into her restaurant lunch table

---

Airport chaos erupts after driver suddenly smashes through fence, hits plane and tractor: police

---

Breaking: US Forces Decimate Iranian Launchers, Stop IRGC’s Attempted Retaking of Hormuz

---

Urgent search underway for more than 20 people after Grand Canyon flash flood

---

DC public schools face special grand jury probe into attendance, truancy and graduation records

---

California bill recognizing 2 Islamic holidays nears Newsom’s desk

---

Tuskegee University president defends dress code amid criticism: ‘Raise the bar, students will reach it’

---

Trump indicates support for Christian-backed plan to help Canadian Jews escape antisemitism

---

Massive AI boom puts one of America’s oldest manufacturers on path to double in size, CEO says

---

Record High Americans Smoke Marijuana While Record Low Smoke Cigarettes

---

DR. REDFIELD: I think different people may look at it in different ways in terms of transparency. CDC had models early on. We didn’t really publicize the models. We used them internally to understand deviation strategies. I think part of the importance of getting the American public’s attention that these models did, we really need the American public to be fully engaged now with great rigor and vigilance on the social distancing. As you pointed out, those models that were done, they assume only about 50 percent of the American public would pay attention to the recommendations. In fact, what we’re seeing is a large majority of the American public are taking the social distancing recommendations to heart. And I think that’s the direct consequence of why you’re seeing the numbers are going to be much, much, much lower than would have been predicted by the models.

Story cited here.

See also  At March on Washington, an urgent plea for black voters to turn out in the midterm elections

Share this article:

Facebook

Twitter