CDC Director: Coronavirus Death Toll Will Be ‘Much, Much, Much Lower’ than Projected

HOST: We were talking about some of the models, whether it’s from the imperial college guy in England or the University of Washington. Thank god some of these numbers are falling short of some of these catastrophic numbers. Tell me about the dynamic of the modeling and how it helps and influences decision making and then, when the reality comes in, how does the decision making transform?

DR. ROBERT REDFIELD: I think it’s really important. First, models are only as good as their assumptions. Obviously, there was a lot unknown about this virus. The ability to actively make a lot of assumptions was much wider than if this was an Influenza B outbreak. Second thing, I will say from a public health perspective, to me, the real value of models is to have a model and then try to understand — if I invest resources here, what does that do to the model? If I invest in intervention strategies here, what does that do to the model? It’s a way of beta testing how you’re going to respond and what it does to the different models. And models should never be used to assume that we have a number. You saw those numbers are quite staggering. You’ve got 200,000 to 2 million Americans are losing their lives before the fall. That’s a pretty staggering number.

HOST: Are throwing those kind of numbers out actually helpful because what they do is scare the hell out of everyone to social distance? Is that the purpose?

---

Newsom targets major affordability squeeze in ‘striking’ convergence with Trump

---

Kamala Harris dives into midterm fight only to get roasted for never having ‘an original thought in her life’

---

Biden-era FBI took ‘minimal corrective action’ and defended staff after targeting Catholics

---

White House report card: Lake America won’t save Trump from drowning

---

ICE officer charged in Minneapolis shooting released in Texas after judge declines to intervene

---

Glenn Beck interview prompts Trump to allow farmers and ranchers to process their own food

---

U.S. Military Uses Lasers to Shoot Down Mexican Cartel Drones at Southern Border

---

The Psychology Behind Republicans Who Support Amnesty for Illegals

---

Soros-backed DA accused of going easy on illegal immigrants gets squeezed by House GOP

---

House Dem Debbie Dingell places Trump’s Lake Ontario name change in the crosshairs

---

Free climber stranded on Georgia rock face calls 911, prompting dramatic rescue by firefighter

---

Maine and Georgia could test whether ticket-splitting is making a comeback

---

Dems derided Trump’s midterm gamble — until he ended up winning big

---

Mail-voting crackdown moves ahead as Trump court win opens door to federal action

---

Brutal Cheap Shot: Video Captures Amazon Driver Sucker Punching Elderly Man Over Parking Dispute

---

DR. REDFIELD: I think different people may look at it in different ways in terms of transparency. CDC had models early on. We didn’t really publicize the models. We used them internally to understand deviation strategies. I think part of the importance of getting the American public’s attention that these models did, we really need the American public to be fully engaged now with great rigor and vigilance on the social distancing. As you pointed out, those models that were done, they assume only about 50 percent of the American public would pay attention to the recommendations. In fact, what we’re seeing is a large majority of the American public are taking the social distancing recommendations to heart. And I think that’s the direct consequence of why you’re seeing the numbers are going to be much, much, much lower than would have been predicted by the models.

Story cited here.

See also  US threatens Belgian university over suspension of academic who exposed Jason Arday fraud

Share this article:

Facebook

Twitter