CDC Director: Coronavirus Death Toll Will Be ‘Much, Much, Much Lower’ than Projected

HOST: We were talking about some of the models, whether it’s from the imperial college guy in England or the University of Washington. Thank god some of these numbers are falling short of some of these catastrophic numbers. Tell me about the dynamic of the modeling and how it helps and influences decision making and then, when the reality comes in, how does the decision making transform?

DR. ROBERT REDFIELD: I think it’s really important. First, models are only as good as their assumptions. Obviously, there was a lot unknown about this virus. The ability to actively make a lot of assumptions was much wider than if this was an Influenza B outbreak. Second thing, I will say from a public health perspective, to me, the real value of models is to have a model and then try to understand — if I invest resources here, what does that do to the model? If I invest in intervention strategies here, what does that do to the model? It’s a way of beta testing how you’re going to respond and what it does to the different models. And models should never be used to assume that we have a number. You saw those numbers are quite staggering. You’ve got 200,000 to 2 million Americans are losing their lives before the fall. That’s a pretty staggering number.

HOST: Are throwing those kind of numbers out actually helpful because what they do is scare the hell out of everyone to social distance? Is that the purpose?

---

House Democrats make push for western Michigan seat that’s long been a GOP stronghold

---

Maryland ballot measure aims to eliminate the state’s last GOP-held House district

---

Trump sidelines sweeping Russia sanctions as GOP allies warn pressure on Putin is slipping

---

Trump pushback, Biden ‘disaster’ and gender surprise: 5 key moments from Kansas Senate debate

---

Michigan Senate race draws presidential-level star power in final stretch

---

Antifa supporter charged with stealing GOP campaign signs in NY race to replace Stefanik

---

Supreme Court blocks use of student IDs as voter identification in New Hampshire

---

Blanche won’t rule out DOJ blocking election certification in ‘doomsday’ scenario

---

Utah man charged with attempted hate crime after alleged threat to ‘blow up’ synagogue

---

Trump invokes Defense Production Act to boost US fuel refining capacity at Iowa rally

---

‘I basically snapped’: New Jersey mayor charges at resident during chaotic council meeting

---

Old Social Media Post Comes Back to Haunt Virginia Democrat After She’s Arrested on Drug Trafficking Charges

---

New York Democrat Accused of Attacking Opponent’s Mother Inside Bathroom: ‘Not Fit to Serve’

---

White House Wants Karoline Leavitt’s Help Finding New Press Secretary After Katie Zacharia Disaster

---

Watch: Socialists and Democrats Trigger Chaotic Brawl in European Nation’s Parliament

---

DR. REDFIELD: I think different people may look at it in different ways in terms of transparency. CDC had models early on. We didn’t really publicize the models. We used them internally to understand deviation strategies. I think part of the importance of getting the American public’s attention that these models did, we really need the American public to be fully engaged now with great rigor and vigilance on the social distancing. As you pointed out, those models that were done, they assume only about 50 percent of the American public would pay attention to the recommendations. In fact, what we’re seeing is a large majority of the American public are taking the social distancing recommendations to heart. And I think that’s the direct consequence of why you’re seeing the numbers are going to be much, much, much lower than would have been predicted by the models.

Story cited here.

See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise

Share this article:

Facebook

Twitter