DOJ Review of Russia Probe Origins Is Now Criminal Investigation

The Department of Justice’s sweeping review into the origins of its Trump-Russia probe has evolved into a criminal investigation, according to the New York Times.

The launch of a criminal probe allows U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor tapped by Attorney General William Barr to lead the review, to subpoena witnesses for testimony and documents. The move also authorizes Durham to impanel a grand jury and file charges.

“If true, this shows Bill Barr is doing EXACTLY his job: following the facts Those who damaged America and broke the law to spread this hoax are about to face accountability,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) tweeted in response to the Times’ report.

The development comes after an NBC report revealed Barr recently expanded his agency’s review, noting that Durham has “found something significant and critics should be careful.” As part of the inquiry, Durham has sought interviews with CIA analysts who assessed Russia’s activities during the 2016 presidential election, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, NBC News stated.

Durham has been tasked with determining whether the Justice Department, FBI and intelligence authorities improperly surveilled the 2016 Trump campaign as part of their investigation into now-debunked coordination with Russia during the last presidential election. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation found insufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Elon Musk agrees with JD Vance on the ‘big lie the Democrats told about violent crime’

Legal experts predict Trump will win National Guard battle despite federal judge ruling

Taiwan’s diplomats yearn for direct talks with Trump amid tariff negotiations

6 Guatemalans in US illegally arrested during investigation for deadly hit-and-run at trailer park

As Trump’s bawdy birthday message to Jeffrey Epstein appears, he still insists he never sent it

Michigan city may ban LGBTQ+ flags on public property, judge rules

Newsom says Trump has ‘relentless, unhinged’ obsession with California during State of the State address

Dramatic video shows shipping containers toppling off cargo ship in California

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu advances to general election against Patriots heir Josh Kraft

Hellfire missile bounces off mysterious orb in stunning UAP footage shown to Congress

Charlotte mayor scores primary re-election victory amid national backlash over gruesome train murder

Trump denies Epstein letter and condemns Israeli strike while getting dinner in DC

DC grand jury declines to indict man accused of threatening National Guard

Hawley pushes legal action against Meta after whistleblowers detail child abuse in VR

Thune’s suitcase nuke – and the filibuster’s latest blast injury

The hard-nosed U.S. attorney has reportedly received briefings on the “four corners” of the FBI’s use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants as part of its controversial counterintelligence operation into the Trump campaign. “Durham is specifically reviewing the FISA warrant obtained by the FBI to surveil former Trump aide Carter Page, as well as general issues relating to surveillance during the 2016 campaign and matters flowing from the FISA process,” Fox News reported.

The FBI used the Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page, but did not disclose to the FISA court that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign or the Democrat National Committee (DNC) funded the dossier, despite indicating that the dossier was compiled as opposition research. Barr has described the dossier as “opposition research” with “clear mistakes.”

Testifying before Congress in May, Barr told lawmakers he believed “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign, but stopped short of saying whether it was done improperly.

“I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal,” he told the Senate Appropriations Committee, before adding, “I am not suggesting that those rules were violated, but I think it’s important to look at them.”