DOJ Review of Russia Probe Origins Is Now Criminal Investigation

The Department of Justice’s sweeping review into the origins of its Trump-Russia probe has evolved into a criminal investigation, according to the New York Times.

The launch of a criminal probe allows U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor tapped by Attorney General William Barr to lead the review, to subpoena witnesses for testimony and documents. The move also authorizes Durham to impanel a grand jury and file charges.

“If true, this shows Bill Barr is doing EXACTLY his job: following the facts Those who damaged America and broke the law to spread this hoax are about to face accountability,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) tweeted in response to the Times’ report.

The development comes after an NBC report revealed Barr recently expanded his agency’s review, noting that Durham has “found something significant and critics should be careful.” As part of the inquiry, Durham has sought interviews with CIA analysts who assessed Russia’s activities during the 2016 presidential election, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, NBC News stated.

Durham has been tasked with determining whether the Justice Department, FBI and intelligence authorities improperly surveilled the 2016 Trump campaign as part of their investigation into now-debunked coordination with Russia during the last presidential election. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation found insufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Watch: Dana White Takes a Shot at ‘Liberal’ Netflix During the Roast of Tom Brady

Watch: Shameless Pro-Palestinian Activists’ Latest Target – WWI Memorial in Central Park

Anti-Israel organizers at George Washington University issue new demand as campus takeover reaches 13th day

Biden warns Netanyahu against Rafah invasion as Israel prepares for action

Group of conservative judges vow to not hire Columbia University law students due to anti-Israel protests

NY v Trump to resume after former president threatened with jail, told trial to last at least 2 more weeks

GOP committee chair demands answers from DC officials on controversial noncitizen voting law

Mica Miller case: Cause of death revealed for South Carolina pastor’s wife

For a Louisiana lawmaker, exempting incest and rape from the state’s abortion ban is personal

GOP secretary of state who spoke out against election denialism wins JFK Profile in Courage Award

State Declares Public Health Emergency After Tuberculosis Outbreak: 1 Dead, 14 Infections Confirmed – 170 Likely Exposed

Dem lawmaker’s response to Kristi Noem’s Kim Jong Un controversy blasted as racist

Minnesota lawmakers debate constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rights

Maxine Waters Thinks Trump Supporters Are Training for Massive Attack on Nation

Signatures submitted in bid to bring California-style ‘Top 2’ primaries to South Dakota

The hard-nosed U.S. attorney has reportedly received briefings on the “four corners” of the FBI’s use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants as part of its controversial counterintelligence operation into the Trump campaign. “Durham is specifically reviewing the FISA warrant obtained by the FBI to surveil former Trump aide Carter Page, as well as general issues relating to surveillance during the 2016 campaign and matters flowing from the FISA process,” Fox News reported.

The FBI used the Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page, but did not disclose to the FISA court that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign or the Democrat National Committee (DNC) funded the dossier, despite indicating that the dossier was compiled as opposition research. Barr has described the dossier as “opposition research” with “clear mistakes.”

Testifying before Congress in May, Barr told lawmakers he believed “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign, but stopped short of saying whether it was done improperly.

“I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal,” he told the Senate Appropriations Committee, before adding, “I am not suggesting that those rules were violated, but I think it’s important to look at them.”