At 4:00 PM EST today, Conservative comedian Steven Crowder and his late-night show team broke what may prove to be the most damning evidence against “big tech” in terms of its political censorship. They discovered that YouTube began actively hiding content from Congresswoman and Democratic Candidate for President Tulsi Gabbard’s YouTube channel. While this isn’t anything new, as YouTube has repeatedly and brazenly throttled and even deleted content that they don’t agree with ideologically, this instance has a new twist. Gabbard’s content was throttled in search results brought up when searching for her content, and only in the US. To be clear, this means that if anyone outside of the US searches for Tulsi Gabbard’s content, it will appear in the first page of search results, as it should. But if someone in the US searches for Gabbard’s content, it is buried in the search results. While Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard filed a suit against YouTube some time ago for suspected unfair treatment, this is a clear escalation in the war of information on the part of YouTube. Crowder and his lawyer, Mr. Bill Richmond, have both taken to the airwaves to announce that they are more than happy to testify in any subsequent investigations or hearings in this matter, and plan on bringing their evidence to bear.
Navy sailor admits killing fellow service member as mother questions missed warning signs
DHS approves plan to verify voter citizenship, monitor mail ballots as Trump push intensifies
DOJ Vows Action After California Blocks Federal Audit of Voter Rolls: ‘What Are They Afraid Of?’
Supreme Court Slaps Down Lower Court Ruling That Backed Biden Admin’s War on Natural Gas Appliances
New Jersey Democrats advance bill criminalizing interference with abortion, transgender healthcare
Los Angeles mayoral primary results: Spencer Pratt upstart campaign falls short
Platner floats jailing billionaires in fiery pre-primary speech pushing far-left agenda
Church cans patriotic staple on Biden’s posh vacation enclave — pastor says tradition ‘doesn’t cut it’
Platner’s ‘living on the sea’ claim dismantled by critics as financial docs paint a different picture
Trump-pardoned MPD officers sue US over fatal pursuit prosecution
Voter fraud or a ‘red mirage’? Why Spencer Pratt’s fate and the LA mayoral results are so complicated
Steve Hilton says ‘world is laughing’ at California’s vote counting process as he pushes reform plan
Alex Murdaugh murder case gets new judge as retrial looms following Supreme Court reversal
Trump Admin to Strip US Citizenship from Foreigners Suspected of Immigration Fraud in Historic Crackdown
New video shows Coast Guard’s Bahamas hunt as team dives into forensics exam of seized Lynette Hooker dinghy
Whatever may come of this particular incident, it is an obvious breach of the quickly dwindling amount of consumer trust in YouTube and Google as a whole, and continues to erode the belief that many Americans have in the modern political system. If one company can have a stranglehold on the flow of information to the American voter, how drastically could this skew the informed opinions of the voter themselves? How could this alter the outcomes of future elections? Facebook already took a fair bit of criticism for the role their 2016 Presidential Election through the publishing of ads from unverified sources, and some on Capitol Hill have sought to regulate their website and other social media platforms.
Navy sailor admits killing fellow service member as mother questions missed warning signs
DHS approves plan to verify voter citizenship, monitor mail ballots as Trump push intensifies
DOJ Vows Action After California Blocks Federal Audit of Voter Rolls: ‘What Are They Afraid Of?’
Supreme Court Slaps Down Lower Court Ruling That Backed Biden Admin’s War on Natural Gas Appliances
New Jersey Democrats advance bill criminalizing interference with abortion, transgender healthcare
Los Angeles mayoral primary results: Spencer Pratt upstart campaign falls short
Platner floats jailing billionaires in fiery pre-primary speech pushing far-left agenda
Church cans patriotic staple on Biden’s posh vacation enclave — pastor says tradition ‘doesn’t cut it’
Platner’s ‘living on the sea’ claim dismantled by critics as financial docs paint a different picture
Trump-pardoned MPD officers sue US over fatal pursuit prosecution
Voter fraud or a ‘red mirage’? Why Spencer Pratt’s fate and the LA mayoral results are so complicated
Steve Hilton says ‘world is laughing’ at California’s vote counting process as he pushes reform plan
Alex Murdaugh murder case gets new judge as retrial looms following Supreme Court reversal
Trump Admin to Strip US Citizenship from Foreigners Suspected of Immigration Fraud in Historic Crackdown
New video shows Coast Guard’s Bahamas hunt as team dives into forensics exam of seized Lynette Hooker dinghy
The next steps, be they Congressional hearings, injunctions against YouTube, or outright breaking up of Big Tech corporations pursuant to laws like the Sherman Act, could reshape the debate on Big Tech and private censorship. It is possible that Big Tech has taken the meddling of US elections to a new level that is only now being made public. If true, they are not only targeting current US Presidential candidates, but they are doing so specifically in the US. There is likely no way that this is the result of an algorithm or fluke. This would be active tampering with the flow of information to the consumer, by a company that actively controls upwards of 90% of media online, based on political ideology.
Story cited here.
