First Amendment News Opinons Politics

YouTube throttling presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard

At 4:00 PM EST today, Conservative comedian Steven Crowder and his late-night show team broke what may prove to be the most damning evidence against “big tech” in terms of its political censorship. They discovered that YouTube began actively hiding content from Congresswoman and Democratic Candidate for President Tulsi Gabbard’s YouTube channel. While this isn’t anything new, as YouTube has repeatedly and brazenly throttled and even deleted content that they don’t agree with ideologically, this instance has a new twist. Gabbard’s content was throttled in search results brought up when searching for her content, and only in the US. To be clear, this means that if anyone outside of the US searches for Tulsi Gabbard’s content, it will appear in the first page of search results, as it should. But if someone in the US searches for Gabbard’s content, it is buried in the search results. While Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard filed a suit against YouTube some time ago for suspected unfair treatment, this is a clear escalation in the war of information on the part of YouTube. Crowder and his lawyer, Mr. Bill Richmond, have both taken to the airwaves to announce that they are more than happy to testify in any subsequent investigations or hearings in this matter, and plan on bringing their evidence to bear.


Graham pushes back on Tillis’ criticism of Noem, Miller for labeling man killed by Border Patrol a ‘terrorist’
Border czar Homan meets with Minnesota officials following immigration operation tensions
Iowa man stops Trump at restaurant with unexpected request before speech
Ben & Jerry’s co-founder calls for ICE to be ‘defunded and disbanded’: ‘This is not freedom’
Breaking Video: Ilhan Omar Physically Attacked During Town Hall
Trump launches midterm push in Iowa, warns losses would derail agenda: ‘We gotta win’
Virginia judge voids redistricting push, rules lawmakers overstepped authority
Jimmy Kimmel, Whose Reaction to Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Got Him Suspended, Turns on the Tears for Alex Pretti
Trump returns to his economic script at Iowa rally amid Minneapolis uproar
Alert: Dems’ 2026 Gerrymandering Efforts in Virginia Suffer Devastating Blow
Young brothers die after trying desperately to help each other in icy pond during winter storm: report
Tech tycoon husband arrested after wife found dead below mountain highway in wealthy enclave
Thom Tillis and Lisa Murkowski call for Noem’s ouster as GOP frustrations grow
Librarian Charged with Making Terroristic Threats Against President Trump
WATCH: The Incredible Moment a Man in an Iowa Diner Asks to Pray for Trump, and Trump’s Perfect Response
See also  Newsom posts himself as ‘Sparkle Beach’ Ken Barbie doll in clap back at Bessent

Whatever may come of this particular incident, it is an obvious breach of the quickly dwindling amount of consumer trust in YouTube and Google as a whole, and continues to erode the belief that many Americans have in the modern political system. If one company can have a stranglehold on the flow of information to the American voter, how drastically could this skew the informed opinions of the voter themselves? How could this alter the outcomes of future elections? Facebook already took a fair bit of criticism for the role their 2016 Presidential Election through the publishing of ads from unverified sources, and some on Capitol Hill have sought to regulate their website and other social media platforms.


Graham pushes back on Tillis’ criticism of Noem, Miller for labeling man killed by Border Patrol a ‘terrorist’
Border czar Homan meets with Minnesota officials following immigration operation tensions
Iowa man stops Trump at restaurant with unexpected request before speech
Ben & Jerry’s co-founder calls for ICE to be ‘defunded and disbanded’: ‘This is not freedom’
Breaking Video: Ilhan Omar Physically Attacked During Town Hall
Trump launches midterm push in Iowa, warns losses would derail agenda: ‘We gotta win’
Virginia judge voids redistricting push, rules lawmakers overstepped authority
Jimmy Kimmel, Whose Reaction to Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Got Him Suspended, Turns on the Tears for Alex Pretti
Trump returns to his economic script at Iowa rally amid Minneapolis uproar
Alert: Dems’ 2026 Gerrymandering Efforts in Virginia Suffer Devastating Blow
Young brothers die after trying desperately to help each other in icy pond during winter storm: report
Tech tycoon husband arrested after wife found dead below mountain highway in wealthy enclave
Thom Tillis and Lisa Murkowski call for Noem’s ouster as GOP frustrations grow
Librarian Charged with Making Terroristic Threats Against President Trump
WATCH: The Incredible Moment a Man in an Iowa Diner Asks to Pray for Trump, and Trump’s Perfect Response
See also  Organizer of GoFundMe for ‘agitating the Nazis’ involved in anti-ICE uprising at Minneapolis church

The next steps, be they Congressional hearings, injunctions against YouTube, or outright breaking up of Big Tech corporations pursuant to laws like the Sherman Act, could reshape the debate on Big Tech and private censorship. It is possible that Big Tech has taken the meddling of US elections to a new level that is only now being made public. If true, they are not only targeting current US Presidential candidates, but they are doing so specifically in the US. There is likely no way that this is the result of an algorithm or fluke. This would be active tampering with the flow of information to the consumer, by a company that actively controls upwards of 90% of media online, based on political ideology.


Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter