Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Top GOP group pumps $37M into fight on key issue dominating midterm races: ‘Much more to come’
Talarico says the divide is ‘top vs. bottom’ — then heads to one of America’s richest donor enclaves
Rubio gives Iran deal the silent treatment
How Brendan Carr’s attack on TV stations echoes FCC chairman under JFK
The wish to be like Wolfgang: Review of ‘Amadeus’
Minnesota AG Ellison lashes out when grilled on fraud scandal: ‘I’m done talking to you’
WATCH: Tuberville backs Trump’s Iran deal as Democrat blasts ‘surrender’
Israel ‘remains firmly committed’ to ceasefire but will continue occupation of southern Lebanon
News Outlet Caves to Democratic Senate Candidate, Kills Poll That Makes Her Look Bad
Watch: Angel Reese Shoves Caitlin Clark, Then Mocks Her as Long-Running Rivalry Is Renewed
Karmelo Anthony runs away after murdering Austin Metcalf: surveillance video
Michigan trio allegedly beat, strangled and gagged man at Las Vegas hotel to collect on gambling debts
Body found in South Carolina ID’d as missing fitness trainer who told friend she was ‘scared for her life’
Obama Snubs Trump from Presidential Center Opening, Then Subtly Attacks Him
North Carolina furniture manufacturer allegedly kills business partner hours after losing contract dispute
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
