Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Trump sends troops $1,776 bonus checks, and Biden coal, in Christmas speech to nation
NY Gov. Hochul to sign bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide: ‘Who am I to deny you?’
Trump drops receipts on US savings since Biden’s Oval Office exit
Lethal US strike sinks narco-terrorist vessel along major Pacific drug route, Pentagon confirms
Border Patrol chief, progressive mayor caught on camera in tense street showdown: ‘Excellent day in Evanston’
Federal employees in the hot seat as GOP senator pushes transparency proposal: ‘Historic opportunity’
Dramatic bodycam video captures moment suspected kidnapper is arrested after 40 years on the run
Barack and Michelle Obama Had Plans with the Reiners on the Night of Their Death
Ford Pays a $19.5 Billion Price After Realizing it Fell for Biden’s EV Scam
Statue of Little-Known Civil Rights Activist Replaces Robert E. Lee in U.S. Capitol
Breaking: Bongino Stepping Down as Deputy Director of the FBI
Nearly two-thirds of American voters back social media ban for kids under 16, Fox News poll shows
Trump set to address the nation in primetime White House speech as Americans report economic squeeze
Watch: Fani Willis Loses It, Plays the Race Card When Confronted with Damning Documents During Hearing
DOJ should not have dropped Trump codefendant charges: Jack Smith
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
