First Amendment • News • Opinons • Politics

YouTube Censors Rand Paul and He’s Mad

Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.

Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.

He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.


“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.

“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.

YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.

“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”

The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.


Mamdani prepares to fulfill promise to axe NYPD unit responsible for controlling protest violence
Trump Drops Bombshell on Blue-State Governors, and They Should Be Very Nervous
TOXIC RAGE: DC Shooter Had ‘Obsession’ Over Mold in His $1.1M Apartment
Democrats turn on Schumer after historic election wins as potential challenger emerges
Matt Lambert, DC doctor, identified as gunman in deadly attack after HOA feud
Family of slain 8-year-old challenges Newsom’s decision to commute California death row sentences
Fact Check: Yes, Muslim-Majority US City Has OK’d Animal Sacrifices, and It’s Even Worse Than Story Currently Going Viral
Oklahoma man, 73, executed for plotting murder of lover’s husband, offers no last words
House Dem misses Hegseth impeachment vote because of major medical procedure one week after Election Day
Breaking: Former Nvidia CEO Will Testify Before Congress About Chinese Spy Scandal
Trump asks Vance to focus on ‘corruption and crime’ in Dem-run cities, states
AG Todd Blanche Now Among Trump Officials Living on Military Base for Safety: Report
AG Todd Blanche Now Among Trump Officials Living on Military Base for Safety: Report
It Wouldn’t Be a ‘Climate Change’ Conference Without Tons of Private Jets There, and the UN’s COP31 Certainly Delivered
It Wouldn’t Be a ‘Climate Change’ Conference Without Tons of Private Jets There, and the UN’s COP31 Certainly Delivered
See also  Prosecutor overseeing Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ investigation resigns

That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.

YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.

Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.

The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.

Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter