Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Tom Emmer calls for Tim Walz, Keith Ellison to ‘serve jail time’ if fraud coverup allegations are true
Republican Rep Burgess Owens to retire from Congress when term ends
VIDEO: College Basketball Ref Knocked Out Cold When Players Turn Violent on Court
DOJ Ends Investigation Into Autopen Scandal With Zero Charges, Grand Juries, or Indictments
Illegal’s dragging of ICE agent shows the exact danger the officer who shot Renee Good feared, expert says
The Iran Strikes Have Flooded X with So Much AI Disinformation That I Went Crawling Back to Cable News
‘Blankies,’ ICE tactics and luxury jets: Top moments from Noem’s House testimony
Op-Ed: America’s Education Crisis, and How to Solve It
Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital
DOJ quietly closes autopen investigation targeting Biden and aides
Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire
GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge
Unearthed video shows Dem candidate supporting ‘reallocation’ of police funding to social service programs
Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns
Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
