Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Obama, Mamdani sing ‘Wheels on the Bus’ with Bronx kids during first joint appearance: video
NYC teen shot dead on Queens basketball court as bystanders filmed; police searching for gunman
Rubio targets Nicaraguan official over alleged torture tied to ‘brutal’ Ortega regime
‘Lego bandit’ accused in bizarre $34K scheme replacing minifigures with pasta
Pro-Life Activist Targeted By Biden Walks Away with Massive Lawsuit Payout
Airline worker stole plane, performed barrel roll before deadly crash: Inside final moments
Trump DOJ Keeps Biden-Era Gun Rule
Walz rips Trump and Vance in Europe, says ‘feeble-minded, trigger-happy president’ has no exit plan for Iran
This African Country Could Start Islamic ‘Sharia Courts’
Ilhan Omar’s office says she’s ‘not a millionaire’ after $30M filing revised down to under $100K: report
US Navy releases photos of ‘fresh meals,’ pushes back on reports of food shortages on Middle East warships
Perfect Justice: South Koreans Teach US Punk a Hard Lesson – 6 Months Hard Labor for Disgusting Public Behavior
Someone Should Sue to Break Up Big Tech’s DC Lobby Monopoly
Newsom administration allegedly knew of $2B California budget error for months: report
Mississippi Governor Trolls Brits Into Oblivion Over Report UK Would Rank as Poorest State
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
