First Amendment News Opinons Politics

YouTube Censors Rand Paul and He’s Mad

Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.

Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.

He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.


“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.

“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.

YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.

“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”

The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.


Three US Service Members Killed, Five Seriously Wounded During Operation Epic Fury Against Iran
Burger King Is Altering Its Flagship Burger for the First Time in Nearly 10 Years
Deadly Austin shooting that killed 3 may be ‘act of terrorism,’ FBI says
9 people injured in mass shooting at Riverfront Live in Cincinnati
Enemy within: Counterterrorism experts fear sleeper cells could be poised inside US
Kamala Harris Intervenes at Last Second in TX Dem Senate Race, Endorses Jasmine Crockett
GOP warns Democrats’ DHS shutdown could jeopardize World Cup security
Nancy Guthrie abduction sparks fears over senior safety in affluent communities: expert
Austin Police Kill Armed Gunman After 3 Die, 14 Wounded Bar Shooting
‘I Love Trump’: Viral Videos Show Iranians Praising Trump, Dancing in the Street Following US Strikes
Dems’ potential 2028 hopefuls come out against US strikes on Iran
‘Bloodthirsty Thugs’: Trump Celebrates Killing of Iranian Regime Leader in Lengthy Post
Hegseth Announces the Woke Organization Formerly Known as the Boy Scouts Will Drop DEI – But the Damage Is Already Done
Newsom book tour missteps expose national campaign ‘growing pains’
Republican NeverTrumpers Tried Throwing a Conference and the Results Were Less Than Stellar
See also  Iowa congressman took cash from Chinese companies buying American farmland

That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.

YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.

Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.

The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.

Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter