First Amendment News Opinons Politics

YouTube Censors Rand Paul and He’s Mad

Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.

Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.

He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.


“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.

“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.

YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.

“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”

The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.


Federal HR office pulls back curtain on sweeping NDA plan aimed at curbing government leaks
US and Iran reach ceasefire extension deal pending Trump’s final approval
Breaking: US and Iran Reportedly Reach Peace Agreement Pending Trump’s Approval
Husband’s phone GPS data prompts feds to search 25-foot-deep Bahamian waters for Lynette Hooker: sources
Judge hands Trump mail-ballot win for now as Democrats’ next move looms
Another One: Male LGBT Activist Arrested After Admitting Abusive Plan for 13-Year-Old Boy
1994 NBA Finals Clip Resurfaces Showing Trump at Knicks Game After Hochul Questioned His Fandom
US Military Prepared to Strike Cuba at Moment’s Notice: ‘When POTUS Says Go, We’re Ready’
Clarence Thomas puts Dems on clock as Alabama GOP emergency map bid stalled
Anti-ICE agitators throw wooden pallets, mattresses at federal agents during chaotic NJ detention center clash
Federal government’s landlord joins Vance fraud crackdown as White House widens hunt: ‘Critical force’
Al Green was a fighter for the Democrats. He lost his Texas primary anyway
Pentagon slashes NATO combat commitments as Trump pushes Europe to defend itself
US denies reports of evacuating US Embassy in Kyiv amid threats of Russian airstrikes
Ukrainian veterans are returning injured, broken, and angry. How can the government help them survive?
See also  FBI launches ‘fittest agent’ competition for field offices

That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.

YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.

Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.

The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.

Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter