Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Dramatic video captures floodwaters bursting through glass doors of college students’ home
Trump appears to debut darker hair, sparking online buzz
Breaking: Deadly Amazon Cargo Plane Crash at Miami Airport Leaves 5 Dead
Amy Acton campaign says armed individual lunged at Ohio governor candidate, injuring multiple people
Hasan Piker brushes off Dems who see him as a liability, names his ’28 choice
Stray bullet from nearby lounge fight kills Frito-Lay worker inside Sam’s Club
After ‘Lake America,’ Trump suggests a new name for the state of New Mexico
Amazon cargo plane overruns Miami airport runway, striking ‘multiple’ vehicles and catching fire
Trump admin’s mail-in ballot fight lands back at Supreme Court
Hikers stranded on Mount Shasta after relying on AI to plan trip, sheriff says
Sanders pushes ‘death penalty’ for crucial US industry that could give advantage to foreign adversaries
Mamdani under fire after symbolic 9/11 pen goes to former al Qaeda defense lawyer
Tragedy Shuts Down Christian Music Festival: Pastor Killed By High Winds and Collapsing Sign
While the Media Panics Over AI, Prisons Use It to Stop Rapes, Fights, and $200M Headcounts
X Caught a 200K-Account Chinese Bot Farm Pushing Panic Over AI Data Centers
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
