Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
DOJ weighs new classified leak charges against Comey as legal pressure escalates
Report: Dem Senate Candidate Deleted Thousands of Radical Tweets, Bashed Middle America: ‘Wish I Never Left California’
GOP warns Trump over war powers deadline amid Iran standstill
House Dem Invokes ‘Nazi’ War Crimes in Attack on Hegseth Over Caribbean Strikes as Rhetoric Escalates
Louisiana to go ahead with primary election for all races besides six House seats
Trump ends DHS’ months-long nightmare that left immigration enforcement without funding
Chick-fil-A employee busted in bizarre $80K mac-and-cheese theft scheme
Mark Sanford quits House race after one month, says fighting national debt is better done outside politics
‘Giggling’ cop killing suspect slammed by judge as prosecutors fought bail release for repeat felony offender
DOJ Uncovers Numerous Ways the Biden Admin ‘Devastated the Lives of Many Christian Americans’
US Moves to Deploy Never-Before-Used ‘Dark Eagle’ Weapons System Against Iran
Cole Allen concedes to stay in jail ahead of Trump assassination attempt trial
Trump was ‘one door away’ from danger, GOP lawmakers says as he demands Secret Service explanation
Crockett ripped for latest ‘low IQ’ jab at paralyzed Texas governor following ‘Hot Wheels’ fallout
After seven years, the first commercial flight from US to Venezuela takes off
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
