Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
WATCH: ‘Shocking’ Ben Franklin smear leaves Smithsonian chief with ‘no regrets’
Former CIA Director James Woolsey, Who Served Under Clinton and Later Advised Trump, Dies at 84
Montana Teen Says God Coached Him As He Used a Lasso Rope to Save Man from Drowning
Dem Rhode Island lawmaker threatens ICE: ‘Your day of reckoning will come m—– f——‘
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Why Fetterman called Mamdani a ‘clown’
Joe Rogan says ex-con guest allegedly killed man, hid dismembered remains month after podcast
Illegal Alien Released Into US by Obama Administration Charged with Killing 3 in Hit-and-Run
FIRST ON FOX: White House reveals who’s joining Trump at correspondents’ dinner — and who can’t attend
4 House Republicans rebel against Trump, vote with Dems to block Iran war powers
Gay Fox News Pundit Under Fire After Acquiring a Newborn Baby
Houthis attack two Saudi tankers, with oil prices jumping in response
One of Charlie Kirk’s Final Endorsements Wins Big in Gubernatorial Primary
AOC roasted over defense bill claim as GOP lawmaker tells her to ‘stop stoking Jew hatred’
Bill Cassidy could deliver Trump his latest Iran war rebuke after U.S. casualties
Arkansas cop tragically dies saving fiancée’s life just hours after proposing
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
