Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Trump vows US will strike Iran’s power plants, bridges if Strait of Hormuz is not reopened
Federal judge blocks Trump push to collect race-based admissions data
Scott Jennings Mocks Dems Over Radical ‘No Kings’ Rallies
Kangaroo Escapes Petting Zoo in Feat of Derring-Do, Leads Zookeeper on 3-Day Chase as Heat-Seeking Drone Helps Solve the Case
This Democrat vows to save Nebraska’s ‘Blue Dot.’ Critics say he’s the one putting it at risk
Artemis II astronauts face toilet trouble as they head toward the moon
Breaking: Downed US F-15 Crew Member Rescued After Evading Capture in Iranian Mountains
DHS slams Democrat Sen Chris Van Hollen claim, says illegal alien caused crash while fleeing ICE
Illegal migrant charged in deadly 124 mph chase that killed pregnant teen, unborn child
Massive manhunt underway in New Hampshire town after gunman allegedly wounds police officer, fires on family
Jesse Watters Asks Todd Blanche Point-Blank If He Thinks Bondi Mishandled Epstein Files
Hegseth Says Service Members May Carry Firearms on Military Bases Reversing Dangerous Biden Policy
A de facto pro forma: Why Washington fixated these sessions as the DHS shutdown dragged on through recess
Tom Homan Reveals What’s Next for DOJ After Bondi’s Exit
At least 13 people injured after vehicle slams into Louisiana parade: sheriff’s office
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
