Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Raman overtakes Spencer Pratt in razor-thin race, AP count shows, but race remains uncalled
Spencer Pratt falls behind Nithya Raman in LA mayoral race after latest vote update
Video captures fireworks exploding from burning trailer that shut down Interstate 75
Multiple people stabbed near Penn Station, leaving one seriously injured as investigation continues
US Forces Shoot Down Iranian Missiles Targeting Gulf Neighbors
Erika Kirk Shows Incredible Poise, Class After Heckler Screams Vile Insult
Trump Makes Large Investment in Specialty Restaurant Chain
Fast Food Manager Arrested for Disgusting Action Toward Customer’s Food
At 82, Marilyn Burns is still defining the American small business dream
Finland’s NATO nerves: A country on Russia’s doorstep wonders about the alliance’s future
Australia Has Launched $1.4B Lawsuit Against 3M Citing “Forever Chemicals”
Spencer Pratt’s runner-up edge over Democrat Raman down to 1%, few thousand ballots
‘Don’t let me be the guy that’s not funny anymore’: Jeff Foxworthy opens up on his possibly final special
The World Is Learning Faster Than Ever: The Bible Said It Would
Unease and hostility meets defiant support as Maine residents grapple with Graham Platner allegations
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
