Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Watch: Mortified Nicki Minaj Goes Speechless for 20 Seconds Straight After Accidental Assassination Joke to Charlie Kirk’s Widow, but Erika’s Response Was Precious
Trump admin recalling around 30 ambassadors as part of State Dept realignment, official confirms
JD Vance turns Turning Point speech into midterm battle cry — and a preview of 2028
Russian general assassinated in Moscow car bombing
Op-Ed: Conservative Katie? Don’t Be Fooled By Katie Hobbs’ New Tax Plan
Watch: JD Vance Gets Fiery Response from AmFest Crowd After Declaring the U.S. ‘a Christian Nation’
Shocking Video: Steelers Wide Receiver Punches Lions Fan in the Face in Middle of Sunday Game
Florida teens to be tried as adults in brutal killing of 14-year-old girl
Schumer accuses DOJ of breaking the law over redacted Epstein files
Trump admin pausing all off shore wind project construction due to national security concerns
Convicted killer kept in police oversight role as city council dismisses concerns over public safety
Colorado governor accuses Trump of playing ‘political games’ after FEMA denies disaster requests
US Catholic bishops president says deportations instilling ‘fear’ in ‘widespread manner’: ‘Concerns us all’
Mock funeral held for the penny at Lincoln Memorial as 230-year coin production ends
DHS responds after reports CISA chief allegedly failed polygraph for classified intel access
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
