Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Republican congressman will end months-long absence from DC after missing 135 roll call votes
WATCH: Tom Hanks Painful Insult to MSNOW Interviewer Goes Viral During Obama Presidential Center Opening
Trump’s 80th Birthday Goes Off Without a Hitch, as UFC Bring Manliness, Spirit of Teddy Roosevelt Back to WH Lawn
Dem justices slap Soros-backed Philly DA with power strip in stunning decision: ‘Not reliable’
Will Dems’ targeting of California GOP-turned-Indie congressman ‘Pan’ out?
UN’s Albanese faces uphill battle with First Amendment case seeking to end sanctions against her
Interest rate cut not likely on the table, even after Iran deal and somewhat falling oil prices
US military kills three ‘narco-terrorists’ in latest lethal strike on vessel in the Eastern Pacific
Judge orders ICE to free Wisconsin mosque leader over ‘substantial’ free speech claim after criticizing Israel
Illegal Alien Who Raped the Body of a Dead Man for 30 Minutes on NYC Subway Learns His Fate
Top GOP lawmaker rallies around conservative school board member facing calls to resign
Comedian Carlos Mencia Facing Criminal Charges in LA, District Attorney Announces
Man fired by firm after viral video shows him scolding dad for taking young daughters into women’s restroom
Rutte urges NATO countries to take advantage of Ukrainian ‘window of opportunity’
Obama Center’s opening ceremony ridiculed for far-left ritual before star-studded show
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
