Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Social media erupts over Mamdani’s silence after Brooklyn coffee shop bans Jewish congressman
MLB Issues Unexpected Response on Players With Bible Verses on Uniforms, Says They Will Never Be Fined
Air traffic control audio captures tense moment two planes nearly collided at Boston Logan Airport
Foreign Born Biden Judge Named ‘Sparkle’ Strikes Down Trump Database to Purge Illegal Voters Because It Purges Voters
Swalwell pal accused of using campaign cash to bankroll ‘luxury lifestyle’ — including Super Bowl tickets
Savannah Guthrie pleads for tips as ransom note claims mom is dead: ‘Somebody knows something’
Zohran Mamdani tries to remake the Big Apple’s congressional delegation
Music Library Curator’s Career Hits High Note with Discovery of ‘New’ Mozart Manuscript
Trump endorses John James in Michigan governor race as GOP rival exits primary
GRAPHIC: One of the Absolute Worst Rape Gang Incidents Involved Baseball Bat, Hot Brand, Red Ball, and Special ‘Pump,’ But Never Made It Into the Report
A tale of two parties: Trump, Mamdani put political clout on the line as four states hold primaries
Why Britain’s prime ministerial doom loop will continue until immigration reform is fixed
Connecticut dad jumped to his death during concert at Madison Square Garden in NYC: report
Coast Guard helicopter crashes during Alaska training mission, injuring four crew members
BREAKING: Heartbreak in Nancy Guthrie Case as Note Believed to Be from Kidnappers Confirms She Is Dead
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
