Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
BREAKING: Afghan Shooter Pleads Not Guilty to All Charges in National Guard Murder Case
Chip Roy Floats Congressional Action on College Football After Lane Kiffin Fiasco: ‘Isn’t Supposed to Be an NFL Lite’
Trump-backed Republican touts ‘great turnout for us’ in must-win special election for GOP
Senators vow push to prohibit US military action in Venezuela if Trump pursues strikes against the country
ICE nabs child rapists, gun-toting robbers as assaults on officers rise 1,153%
Venezuela land strikes will start ‘very soon,’ Trump says at final Cabinet meeting of the year
University of Delaware student accused of ‘frightening’ plot to attack campus police
Virginia GOP chairman stepping down after drastic losses in November elections
Treasury Department Investigating Apparent Taxpayer Funding of Terror Organization Under Biden and Walz
Trump says wounded National Guardsman’s mother has insisted to him that her son will survive shooting
Comer targets Walz in new House investigation, citing nearly $1B in alleged Minnesota fraud
Hakeem Jeffries Sides with Trump in Attempt to Drive a Wedge Between White House and Mike Johnson
Watch: Giants Kicker’s Bizarre Field Goal Blunder Leads to Confusion
Recordings of Brian Walshe played as prosecutors outline alleged love triangle murder
ICE Arrests Two Illegal Aliens for ‘Heinous Crimes Against Children’
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
