Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Watch: African Who Invaded Spanish City Has Chilling Warning to the Rest of Europe
18-Year-Old Woman Murdered in House Owned by Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s Husband
ICE lodges detainer on Salvadoran national, 18, accused of 2 fatal shootings in Houston
Socialist frontrunner in the hot seat after ‘Cancel Thanksgiving’ post emerges online
FBI releases eerie new age-progression renderings of accused University of Colorado student killer
Weapons stockpile shortages impacting military strategy in the Mideast
The biggest threat in America’s race with China isn’t Beijing, tech executive warns
Trump Shoots Down Claims Iran Attacked US Water Systems, Blames ‘Corrupt’ Tim Walz
Watch: Spanish Woman’s ‘Suicidal Empathy’ on Full Display as Africans Invade City
Late-term abortion takes front seat as blue state rushes to expand access before session ends
Get your Shark Week fix in DC
FBI still searching for 2020 rioter who helped demolish ICE facility
Fauci faces lifetime ban from federal government work under new bill following explosive hearing
Internet erupts over report that Platner’s replacement in key Senate race fathered children with second cousin
Watch: Bill Murray’s Brutal SNL Skit from 1987 Called Out Trans Surgeon as Deranged Child Mutilator
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
