Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Cuomo calls out NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani over alleged rent-stabilized apartment: ‘Move out immediately’
American Dream Fading? New Graph Shows Shocking State of Marriage and Home Ownership
Trump nominates State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce as UN deputy representative
Shirts Spotted at LAX Shop Signal Trump’s Cultural Domination Is Reaching New Heights
Alert: Shooting at CDC, Gunman Now Dead
Kash Patel celebrates major FBI achievements and record seizures during Trump’s first 200 days in office
JD Vance Breaks Down Why He Was Running Awkward in Contrived Leftist ‘Scandal’: He Was Playing ‘Ogre’
CNN Pollster Describes Exactly What Trump Is Doing Right — and the Anchors’ Faces Could Curdle Milk
Montauk yacht death: Timeline reveals bikini mogul’s final days in Hamptons before mysterious demise
Shooter named in CDC headquarters attack that left Georgia police officer dead
Op-Ed: The TV Weather Heat Index Has Become a Climate Propaganda Tool
Democratic strategist says party lacks ‘moral authority’ on Texas redistricting fight
Ancient Christian Warning Excavated in Church from 400 AD – Modern Christians Should Heed Its Words Immediately
Kamala Can’t Save Them Now: New Poll Puts Far Lefty, Fox News Conservative at Top of Cali Gov Race
Zelensky pours cold water on Trump’s Alaska peace talks, rejects land swap
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
