First Amendment News Opinons Politics

YouTube Censors Rand Paul and He’s Mad

Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.

Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.

He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.


“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.

“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.

YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.

“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”

The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.


Former Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell dead at 92
DHS reviews citizenship cases from Somalia, other high risk countries for possible fraud
Judge suggests DOJ leadership pushed for Kilmar Abrego Garcia prosecution
Florida firefighters allegedly waterboarded, whipped rookie over TikTok video as 4 face criminal charges
Bear remains under California home after weeks of failed removal attempts
Mainstream Media Reporter Slammed for Insane Suggestion About Somali Day Care Owners Turning to Violence
SEE IT: Daycare center at heart of Minnesota fraud investigation fixes sign after viral mockery
Shirley associate in viral video says he filed criminal complaint against Walz over daycare fraud allegations
Mamdani taps controversial lawyer who defended al Qaeda terrorist for top role: ‘Powerful advocate’
Fox News Politics Newsletter: House GOP whip calls for revoking citizenship over Minnesota fraud
UK government squirms after repatriating antisemitic, anti-white activist from Egypt
Churches Across the Country Join in Troubling Closure Trend for Final Sunday of 2025
BREAKING: Kash Patel Says Minnesota Fraud Probes Were ‘Buried’ Under Biden – They Implicated His ‘Allies’
Police Release New Dash Cam Footage That May Show Missing Texas Teen Camila Mendoza Olmos
Disney to Pay $10 Million Penalty for Alleged Illegal Targeting of Children
See also  Is Gavin Newsom’s social media strategy starting to get stale?

That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.

YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.

Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.

The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.

Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter