Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump endorses Jack Ciattarelli for New Jersey governor: ‘A winner’

Trump backs Jack Ciattarelli in coveted New Jersey governor race

Fatal fall in Washington’s North Cascades kills 3, leaves 1 survivor

Florida State University alleged mass shooter appears in mugshot with disfigured face after hospital release

Far-left mayor arrested at ICE facility denies impeding law enforcement, says protest ‘absolutely’ effective

Tycoon Couple Arrested After Massive Federal Raid, Accused of Working with Cartels

Pro-Israel Americans urge Trump to ‘tread lightly’ with Qatar

Trump officials celebrate white South Africans’ arrival in DC

Major Underwater Volcano Off US Coast Is Showing Signs of Impending Eruption, Scientists Say

Fetterman Showing ‘Warning Signs,’ Dems Might Step In: Explosive Reports

Newsom calls on California cities to ban homeless encampments

Organizers Cancel Former ‘The Voice’ Contestant’s Concerts Because She Attended a Pro-Life Event

Harvard president claims ‘unfounded retaliation’ amid Trump funding feud

Federal judge allows IRS to share illegal alien data with DHS in court win for Trump

ABC prays Pope Leo XIV will ‘counter’ Trump: Liberal Media Scream

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020