Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Liberal city’s ‘disgraceful’ move before baseball’s opening day has activists furious

Leftwing groups attempting to block congressional oversight of Biden may violate law, conservative org warns

LA DA George Gascon challenged by Jonathan Hatami, prosecutor of child killers

President Biden to visit Mississippi after tornadoes ravage state, leaving 25 dead

Biden ‘strongly opposes’ resolution ending COVID-19 national emergency, but won’t veto it after Senate vote

Illegal Alien Arrested After What He Allegedly Did to Minor Girl in Walmart Parking Lot

Four Words Turn Hillary Clinton’s Gun Control Rant on Its Head and Make Her Look Like a Fool

Ohio lawmaker moves to force vote on constitutional amendment rules

Minneapolis City Council to discuss potential settlement in major Floyd lawsuit

Tucker Carlson Knocks the Socks Off His Competition with Ratings, But What ‘The Five’ Did Is Truly Amazing

Fans Ecstatic Over Who Made an Appearance on ‘The Five’ – ‘You Always Do a Good Job’

Huge: Rand Paul Says He Has New Information on Fauci’s Employment Despite His ‘Retirement’ Claim

Teen Carjackers Busted After Pesky Manual Transmission Thwarts Their Scheme: Police

Feds examine gas pipeline at Pennsylvania chocolate factory blast site

Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman planning to return to Senate in mid-April after depression treatment

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020