Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Minneapolis ordinance imposes highest minimum cigarette price in America

Tennessee nears law banning adults from helping minors find, receive sex reassignment care

What Was Spotted Under a Chinese Bomber Looks Just Like Piece of American Tech Lost Over China

Early in-person voting starts for North Carolina primary runoffs

Chicago Cubs Pitcher Forced to Remove Glove with American Flag Because it Was a ‘Distraction’

NY v. Trump: Tabloid publisher testifies he bought stories on Tiger Woods, ex-Obama chief of staff

US energy giant sounds alarm on Biden’s climate rules targeting power plants

Hollywood Is Reportedly in Rough Shape and in the Midst of Massive Change: ‘Money Is So Tight’

Biden, Feds Possess Secret AI Tool to Censor and Indoctrinate ‘At Scale’ Ahead of Election – What You Need to Know

Bragg ‘allowed political motivations’ to ‘infect’ prosecution of Trump, House Judiciary GOP says

Police at Princeton pop-up encampment arrest 2 as anti-Israel protests sweep universities

Federal judge rejects Trump request for new trial in E. Jean Carroll suit, says he must pay $83.3 million

NYC Construction Workers and Union Members Go Wild When Trump Makes Unexpected Visit En Route to Courthouse

A Nuclear Apocalypse Has Never Been This Fun: After the ‘Fallout’ Show, Here Are the Games to Play

Dems attack Johnson over impassioned Columbia speech condemning anti-Israel student activists

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020