Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump says Karoline Leavitt will leave White House press secretary role, become outside advisor

Former SPLC official arrested as feds expand case over alleged $4M scheme involving extremist groups

Former SPLC Exec Arrested on Fraud Charges Connected to KKK Relationship

DOJ charges 11 in alleged decadelong sham marriage scheme involving Chinese nationals

Report: Russia Is Giving China ‘Incredibly Important’ Military Technology to Use Against US

Trump’s dead ‘anti-weaponization fund’ comes back to life in Georgia Senate race

Ukraine pauses strikes on tankers after JD Vance request and Russian threats

‘Decoy’ Air Force One was protected by US fighter jets, official says

DOJ heavyweights throw monkey wrench in Dem plans to put Trump allies in hot seat

Leftists Melt Down as ESPN’s Biggest Star Hangs Out With Trump to Promote High School Athletes

Graphic Language: Video Shows El-Sayed Pal Hasan Piker Bragging About Wiping ‘My A** With the Constitution’

Florida deputy killed ex-girlfriend over a TV, then himself, sheriff says

Texas mom accused of killing 3-year-old daughter captured in Mexico after nearly 30 years on the run

Former ESPN and NBC Sideline Reporter Michele Tafoya Triumphs in GOP Senate Primary

Breaking: Inflation Rate Drops, Defying Economist Projections

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020