Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Senators warn of ‘fragile’ US air system after 43-day shutdown

Dem congresswoman indicted for ‘particularly selfish’ alleged theft of FEMA relief funds for campaign use

Blue city suspect with numerous prior arrests federally charged after allegedly setting woman ablaze on train

Trump says he will meet NYC Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani this week

Illegal immigrant caught driving commercial truck with valid New York CDL at California checkpoint

House votes to repeal controversial Arctic Frost provision from government shutdown bill

Lindsey Graham eyes big payday from Biden-era phone data seizure

Epstein files to go public as Trump says he signed law authorizing release of records

Senate Candidate Punched in the Face During Anti-Islam Demonstration in Dearborn, Michigan

‘Worst Candidate Possible’: Jasmine Crockett Excoriated After Embarrassing ‘Jeffrey Epstein’ Gaffe

Kansas City Chiefs Heiress Gracie Hunt Supports TPUSA Super Bowl Halftime Alternative to Rapper Bad Bunny

Fox News Poll: Voters say White House is doing more harm than good on economy

Mia Cathell testifies on anti-ICE uprisings at Senate judiciary hearing

‘Stone-cold liar’: Top House Dem lashes out at Comer for accusing him of soliciting Epstein donations

James Comey’s Lawyers Are Set to Deploy a ‘Long Shot’ Defense Strategy That Centers Around Trump

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020