Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Crockett Cries Racism Over Criticism of Democrat Who Colluded with Epstein Against Trump

Leaked Public School Teacher Union Training Exposes Plans to Undermine Parents, Indoctrinate Students with Gender, Race Ideology

Doubling Down: Top House Democrat says focus on high prices ‘absolutely going to continue’

WATCH: Democrats struggle to defend Schumer after shutdown ends with few wins

North Carolina driver says bald eagle dropped cat through her windshield: ‘You may not believe me’

Multiple Chicago police officers attacked in downtown violence in which several victims were shot

It won’t get any better: Washington faces another looming government shutdown

Trump terminates deportation protections for Somali nationals living in Minnesota ‘effective immediately’

Breaking: Marjorie Taylor Greene to Resign from Congress Following Trump Feud

Texas files emergency Supreme Court petition after Trump-backed congressional map blocked by federal judges

Florida to use hundreds of confiscated Chinese drones as target practice for US military

Marjorie Taylor Greene announces shock resignation from Congress after public divorce with Trump

Marjorie Taylor Greene announces resignation from Congress after President Trump withdraws endorsement

‘Just say yes’: Trump cuts in as NYC mayor-elect Mamdani dodges on calling him a ‘fascist’ at Oval Office

Missouri judge who wore Elvis wigs in courtroom agrees to resign after ‘integrity’ concerns

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020