Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

NEA insider blows whistle on ‘toxic’ culture and far-left politics inside teachers union: ‘It’s a cult’

Trump Forces the Fake News to Stare at the Mugshots of Violent Illegal Criminals Caught By ICE

GOP Barely Passes DHS, ICE Funding Thanks to 7 Democrats Who Defied Their Party

Doubts abound about proposed dual citizenship ban

Maine’s bipartisan brand of political nepotism

Texas hold ’em: Greg Abbott argues he set the standard for governors and illegal immigration

Nevada judge retires after court grants protective order to attorney she was accused of stalking

Trump says US should have tested NATO by invoking Article 5 over border security

Top 5 moments from Jack Smith’s testimony on Capitol Hill

Trump snubs Canada by withdrawing country’s invite to join ‘most prestigious Board of Leaders ever’

Newly minted Virginia AG who fantasized about opponent’s family dying roasted over glaring typo

Video captures Detroit student allegedly wielding box cutter in classroom chase as teacher intervenes

RNC eyes ‘America First’ midterm convention to boost Trump, GOP ahead of critical elections

Inside ‘MELANIA’: The unprecedented access behind Melania Trump’s first film

Armed carjacker’s wild Corvette rampage turns downtown into war zone; sergeant wounded in deadly shootout

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020