Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

DOJ opens probe into Harvard’s financial aid for alleged discrimination against American students

Bodycam catches Sunny Hostin invoking her legal chops as cops cite Harvard-grad son for trespassing

Trump says first call with new UK PM Burnham went ‘very well,’ pledges US support

Lindsey Graham’s Sister Announces She’s Running for Full Senate Term

Rand Paul releases docs that reveal FBI halted border inspection of virus researcher over Wuhan lab links

Johnson’s strategy to bypass Democrats’ SAVE Act blockade survives key vote, handing GOP big win

Socialist insurgents force moderate Democrats into high-risk showdown over must-hold races

Top media networks put on notice after refusing to air Trump’s primetime address: ‘Serious concerns’

5 dead in attempt to save a struggling swimmer in Ohio river

Warren’s latest ‘kiss of death’ endorsement sparks mockery over disastrous political picks

Illegal immigrant who murdered Michigan woman sues Trump, demands $75M, public apology, US citizenship

Craziest Video You’ll See Today: Trans Adult Jumps Like Toddler After ‘Misgendering,’ Dares Cop to Arrest Him, Then the Fun Starts

Five dead after group attempts to save struggling swimmer in Ohio

Democrats Make Graham Platner Replacement All But Official – Not Everyone Is Pleased

Gunman charged after wounding 9 in Tucson nightlife shooting before cop takes him down

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020