Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

What We Know About the African and Extremely Likely Jihadist Mass Shooter in Austin

Radical US mosques honor Iran’s Supreme Leader’s ‘martyrdom’ with memorial services, eulogy: ‘Our leader’

Bill Clinton reveals Trump ‘never said anything’ linking himself to Epstein’s crimes

WWII Hero Awarded Medal of Honor for Refusing to ID Jewish Americans While at Gunpoint: ‘We Are All Jews’

15 Months Ago It Was Leftists’ Mecca – Now the Dept. of Education Just Unfurled a Banner Featuring the Left’s Most-Hated Enemy After Trump

Starmer fires back at Trump over Iran ‘unlawful action’

PHOTOS: Usha Vance talks child literacy at hospital reading event

WATCH: Hillary Clinton storms out of Epstein deposition after House lawmaker leaks photo from inside

WATCH: House releases Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Epstein deposition videos

Fetterman blasts Iran strike critics, Ayatollah’s apologists: ‘Let’s see who grieves for that garbage’

This Chicago School Is 92% Empty and Spends $93k Per Student – You’ll Be Sick to Learn How Many of Them Read Proficiently

Man accused of luring UGA student with ‘walk home’ ruse before brutal assault: police

Texas college student identified among victims in Austin bar shooting probed as possible terror attack

Hegseth on Iran Strikes: People ‘Hell-Bent on Prophetic Islamist Delusions Cannot Have Nuclear Weapons’

Trump says US sank 10 ships in Iran strike, ‘last, best chance’ to act

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020