Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Former Capitol Police officer running for Congress in different district than failed 2024 bid

Federal judge grills DOJ lawyers over censure of Democratic senator

Video: Joy Behar Compares Cities Church to Dachau Concentration Camp Where Jews Were Frozen Alive – Single Most Evil Thing Ever Said on ‘The View’

Patriots QB Drake Maye Quotes Bible at Super Bowl Media Day, Hopes to Lead Others to Jesus

Vote ‘no’ but take the dough: Senate Democrats claim credit for bill they opposed

Newsom’s PAC takes cash from firm promising to win state contracts for clients

Judge rules federal agents must limit tear gas at protests near Portland ICE building

Trump admin sued by New York, New Jersey over Hudson River tunnel funding freeze: ‘See you in court’

Girl, 12, dangles from ski chairlift in California before crashing to ground in terrifying video

White House approves Medal of Honor for fallen Army Staff Sgt Michael Ollis after years-long push

Lawmakers probe National FFA over Chinese Communist Party ties and DEI programs

Mamdani calls on DA to not prosecute mentally ill man shot by police during knife attack

Reps. Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett Drop SAVE Act Demands After Meeting with Trump

Trump reacts to NBC host Savannah Guthrie’s mother Nancy’s mysterious abduction

Op-Ed: Trump is a Performer – Let Him Perform

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020