Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Watch: Emotional ‘Sharia Law Survivor’ Begs Schools to Keep Out Islamism, as Lib Teen Mocks Him Literally Behind His Back

Six prime ministers, nine lives: Downing Street’s ‘chief mouser’ Larry the cat outlasts another leader

NYT’s Gonna NYT: Paper Uses Father’s Day to Pretend Being Trans Can Make a Woman a ‘Father’

A timeline of Trump’s $14 million Reflecting Pool makeover

Cops could be forced into race-based guessing game after Supreme Court move, Thomas joins dissent

Judge rejects accused WHCA dinner shooter’s bid to disqualify Blanche and Pirro

Chicago’s deadly Juneteenth weekend leaves 7 dead as Trump shames Dem gov for inaction

Former Gambino associate turned New Jersey councilman accused of running loansharking ring while in office

Supreme Court reinstates conviction in 1979 Etan Patz murder

Judge Releases Surveillance Footage of Karmelo Anthony’s Murder of Austin Metcalf

NYPD Officer Jumps on Top of Vehicle and Shoots Suspect Who Hit Multiple Officers

Chicago resident living in shadows of Obama Presidential Center reveal chaos caused by years-long construction

Alan Greenspan dies at age 100

Attacks Against Christians Rise in Major European Country

District court judges weighing Trump policies face repeated slap downs by appeals courts

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020