Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Virginia Dems Make Glaring Errors In Rushed Court Motion To Save Gerrymandering Scheme

Hegseth says Pentagon will review Mark Kelly’s public statements about classified briefing amid ongoing feud

Rebukes of Trump’s Pick for FDA Head Miss One Critical Fact

Union-funded anti-Spencer Pratt ad sparks backlash as critics say it could help him

Students’ pre-prom gathering turns into deadly nightmare as bullets fly

Marco Rubio Reveals the Message He Delivered Pope Leo During ‘Important Meeting’ at Vatican

Mom charged with child abuse after toddler found with tattoo in ‘deplorable’ home: cops

Trump says US helped secure release of 5 prisoners in Belarus deal, thanks Lukashenko

Savannah Guthrie urges public to help find missing mother Nancy in emotional Mother’s Day post

Kristin Smart search ends with no remains found as detectives analyze evidence

Watch: MLB Team Makes ‘Middle School Mistake’ As Season Continues to Spiral

Biden seeks to block DOJ release of 2017 audio, court filing says

Should ‘The View’ Be Considered News? ABC and FCC Go to Battle Over Embattled Show

Major Evangelic Denomination Sees Memberships Fall Amid Debates Over Female Pastors, Growing Distrust

Alert: African Islamists to Begin Executing Christian Women and Children from Group of 416 Recently Kidnapped Hostages

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020