Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

GOP veteran defeats populist candidate in one of America’s most conservative districts

MAGA triumph: Trump ally Ken Paxton defeats John Cornyn in bitter Texas GOP primary war

We Could Cover 10 Percent of the Entire Deficit if Gov’t Stopped Accidentally Making Improper Payments

Owner of Trump House Who Was Brutally Beaten Has Died – Wife Believes Politics Motivated Murder

Reparations-Backing California Candidate Run Out of Black LA Neighborhood Over His ‘Devil Blue Eyes’

Murder-suicide probe underway after alleged Tom Selleck impersonator scam targeted woman

Mamdani faces a Muslim problem ahead of Gracie Mansion protest

DOJ sues UCLA for fostering ‘hostile’ antisemitic environment for Jewish and Israeli students

Thom Tillis Unloads on Hegseth, Ken Paxton in Weekend Tantrum as GOP’s Establishment Wing Faces Extinction

Graham Platner vows to ‘come after’ Bezos as Senate hopeful escalates billionaire tax fight

Woman killed by flying restaurant umbrella in freak accident at South Carolina lakeside restaurant

Ousted Senate Republican digs in against Trump, takes jab at leadership style

Democrats’ Official X Account Forced to Delete Horribly Disrespectful Memorial Day Post – But We’ve Got the Original

Jake Auchincloss denies supporting Collins in Maine Senate race after opposing Planter bid

Redistricting push in South Carolina fails after state Senate bails

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020