Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Supreme Court worried letting Trump fire Lisa Cook jeopardizes Fed independence

‘Patrick Bateman meets Sparkle Beach Ken’ turns Davos into the Gavin Newsom show

Federal judge blocks lawmakers’ effort to force DOJ release of Epstein files

Kavanaugh warns Trump case could ‘shatter’ Federal Reserve independence in Supreme Court hearing

Watch: Scott Bessent Unleashes on Gavin Newsom at Davos, Gives Him a Painful New Nickname

CNN Panelist Issues Retraction and Apology After Going Too Far in On-Air Trump Attack

NATO chief praises Trump at Davos, says he forced Europe to ‘step up’ on defense

Vice President JD Vance to visit Minneapolis, source says, amid unrest over ICE operations

NATO Chief Tells World Leaders ‘Trump Is Right’ About Greenland

Air Force One Forced to Turn Around and Make Unscheduled Landing During Trump’s Trip to Europe

NASA astronaut who was stuck in space retires after 27-year career

Mamdani Turns Into Kamala Harris on ‘The View’ – Responds With Gibberish to Question on Aides’ Rabid Anti-White Racism

Mexico flies 37 cartel members to US under pressure from Trump admin

Trump set to meet with foreign leaders at the World Economic Forum and more top headlines

Ex-NFL reporter launches GOP Senate bid, reveals how she will flip script on state’s ‘crisis of leadership’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020