Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Four noncitizens charged with illegally voting in 2020, 2022 and 2024 federal elections in New Jersey

Trump teases US will be ‘taking over’ Cuba ‘almost immediately’ in Florida speech

Pentagon orders withdrawal of 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany as Trump escalates feud with Merz

Op-Ed: Now Is the Time for Republican Courage on Abortion

Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect

Domino’s driver runs down customer over tip dispute, caught on camera: police

Christian School That Was Punished for Stand Against Trans Athletes in Girls’ Sports Gets the Last Laugh

57 pounds of marijuana worth $220,000 found in Maryland man and woman’s suitcase at Dulles Airport

Republican Oklahoma Senate Candidate Found Dead in His Truck

Oregon Man Faces Lengthy Prison Sentence After Targeting Customs and Border Protection Helicopter

Trump aims to reset war powers clock with controversial bid to bypass Congress

Trump jokes about security concerns, mic problems and Dr Oz during freewheeling Florida speech

DOJ Targets Blue State for Giving Illegals Financial Assistance While Neglecting U.S. Citizens

Federal Judge Forces ICE to Release Illegal Alien Murder Suspect

Black conservative unleashes on Obama for ‘constantly whining’ after SCOTUS voting rights decision

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020