Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Slain NJ mom Brooke Hanlon’s family backs investigators two months after her stabbing death

Postpartum mom Lindsay Clancy on trial for murder brings court to a halt with sudden breakdown

Trump State Department Axes Biden-Era Initiative That Sought to Spread DEI Around the World

Why She Left: Details of Karoline Leavitt’s (Not So) Abrupt Departure and Just How Much Trump Adores Her

California Dem ripped for ‘perverted agenda’ ahead of fundraiser at risqué nightclub

GOP congressman’s ex-wife sues, alleging sensitive image of 2-year-old daughter was posted online

Extremism expert hailed as ‘terrific’ by ex-Biden official slapped with federal charges

Florida State University hit with federal civil rights investigation over race, sex-based scholarship programs

Dinesh D’Souza Shows the Truth of the Bible Through Biblical Archaeology

What is a special grand jury? Latest Jeanine Pirro move stirs up questions

Police rescue 60 cats and kittens from abandoned sailboat off Washington beach after 6-day operation

Ex-officer accused in New Orleans mass shooting plot released without charges

Lifelong Lib Chris Matthews Goes Scorched Earth on Far-Left Dems, DSA Members: ‘I’m Not with This Crowd’

Convicted rapist who preyed on women at America’s top party school faces reckoning after courthouse dash

LA Lakers Sold to Ex-Disney CEO and Jared Kushner’s Brother for Record-Breaking Price

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020