Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

‘Ghost ships’ ferrying illicit oil have sailed into Trump’s crosshairs

Doctor mysteriously found dead inside Dollar Tree freezer reportedly naked

Terrifying video shows out-of-control MTA bus plowing into cars in the Bronx, injuring 8

Pentagon launches full command investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly over ‘serious misconduct’ allegations

Comer gives Clintons last chance to testify in Epstein inquiry before contempt proceedings

Judge Hannah Dugan’s trial for illegal immigrant escape case begins with FBI agent on the stand

Ilhan Omar lashes out at ‘sick’ Republicans for investigating her alleged marriage to brother

Watch: Announcers Stunned as Irate LeBron James Gets Physical with Referee

DHS arrests ‘worst of the worst’ illegal migrants, including murderers and pedophiles, in weekend operation

Trump sues BBC for $10 billion over Jan. 6 speech edit

Erika Kirk shares update after private in-person meeting with Candace Owens

Police release new video of person of interest in Brown University shooting as manhunt resumes

Opinion: Trump’s Post on Rob Reiner’s Death Was a Massive Misstep, While the Vast Majority of MAGA Posts Got It Exactly Right

DC police accused of manipulating crime stats as federal probe finds thousands of misclassified cases

AOC’s luxury spending binge in Puerto Rico reignites questions about ‘socialist’ brand: ‘Peak hypocrisy’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020