Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Mike Johnson reveals how he’ll vote on Epstein files bill led by Trump critic Thomas Massie

Headed for the exits: Why 3 dozen House members aren’t running for re-election

California judge frees second murder suspect without bail as DA warns ‘people’s lives’ are at risk

House conservatives rally behind push to impeach Judge Boasberg over role in Trump investigation

Indiana man accused of killing house cleaner who mistakenly arrived at front door charged with manslaughter

Trump says whether he would sign Epstein files bill

Dems Beat Up One of Their Own After She Points Out Dubious Timing of Congressman’s Retirement

President Trump Threatens More Republicans With Primaries if They Don’t Vote For Redistricting Plan

Deep Dive: Trump and Charlie Kirk’s Shooters Are Both Linked to the Furry Fetish – What Is It?

Five Republicans Defy Trump in Bid to Give Federal Employees Full Union Rights

Granddaughter of ‘Charlotte’s Web’ author blasts DHS for use of book title in Charlotte immigration sweep

Trump admin sues over California law banning ICE from wearing face masks to shield identities

Larry Summers steps back from public roles after House release of Epstein correspondence

Human smugglers charged after panga boat capsizes killing 4 off San Diego coast

Rep Raskin says Democrats have ‘huge’ tent with room for MTG after her recent rift with Trump, GOP leaders

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020