Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Harris keeps 2028 door open as she hits midterm campaign trail, warns ‘28 won’t matter’ without 2026

Takaichi and victim families make multifront plea for US to help Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea

‘Big Sister’ warning resurfaces as Massachusetts expands home visits after Clancy trial

White House Official Says Fox News and Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Have ‘Revealed Themselves for Who They Truly Are’

El-Sayed’s Trump-Backed Opponent Breaks with POTUS on Iran: ‘We Have to Bring Prices Down’

Chuck Grassley doesn’t rule out investigating Trump Jr.’s Russian-funded wedding party

Breaking: ICE Nabs Dem Staffer Who Is Former News Anchor in Airport Operation

Missouri mom who put newborn in oven instead of crib learns fate as murder charge dropped

Bodycam footage captures moments after ICE shooting of Venezuelan migrant in Austin

Beyond killer robots: China’s real AI threat to America is already here, experts warn

Former USPS worker indicted after allegedly dumping 300-plus Utah mail-in ballots without delivering one

Harris: ‘Attack on DEI’ is ‘attack on maternal care’ in el Sayed campaign stop

DOJ charges Utah USPS worker after 300 mail-in ballots allegedly tossed in dumpster

Watch: Obama Walks Into Own Trap, Trashes Trump WH for Booting CNN, Then Video of His WH Booting Fox Hits

Two Ole Miss students found dead as packaged kratom is recovered at both sites: officials

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020