Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

EXCLUSIVE: Pence pushes to rename bill for Lindsey Graham, recalls final talk: ‘Bring Putin to the table’

Trump says ‘proud American veterans’ will replace illegal immigrant truck drivers

Former Marine running for Congress says Trump is the Antichrist and ‘must be killed’ in shocking video

Tim Scott floats Lindsey Graham’s sister as permanent successor

GLAAD Complains Over New Study Showing Movies Have Become Less Gay: ‘Our Stories are Disappearing’

Drunk wrong-way driver killed Mass. trooper after 9 drinks at bar, DA report says

Retired math professor charged after wife, an airline meteorologist, found shot dead: cops

House Democrats fracture badly over Massie amendment to cut $3.3B in US aid to Israel

Bill Maher Chides ‘Extreme’ NPR During Sitdown Interview with Far-Left Outlet: ‘I’m Surprised You Even Had Me On’

Harris calls for ICE probe after Maine shooting amid renewed ‘border czar’ criticism

Illegal Alien Trucker Who Caused Deadly 8-Car Crash Learns His Fate in Court

Biden, Who Allegedly Couldn’t Sign His Own WH Documents, Claims He’s Written an Entire Book About Being President

Fetterman downplays GOP fundraising partnership and dodges reelection plans

Not a Single Democrat Showed Up to Wednesday’s Senate Hearing on Taxpayers Being Defrauded

Todd Blanche confirmation hearing turns to Smith bombshells: ‘Did Jack Smith read my emails?’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020