Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Iran faces financial death blow because of war

Virginia Democrats dig in on DHS funding line despite ISIS-linked shooting at ODU, illegal immigrant murder

Red States Offer Low Housing Prices as Yet Another Draw for Families

Ex-Dem senator admits to affair with former bodyguard in explosive court filing: ‘Romantic and Intimate’

The Economist Blasted with Flurry of Posts for Bemoaning Death of Murderous Ayatollah

State Department cuts fee to renounce US citizenship by 80% to $450

Teens accused of plotting twisted ‘blood ritual’ school killing giggle in cruiser about glam shot

Critical swing state candidates reveal where they stand on DHS funding after suspected terror attacks

Leftists Tell Conservative Students To Kill Themselves, Use Kirk Assassination Images To Threaten Event

Government’s power to surveil foreign threats at risk over SAVE Act fight

Visit Goes Horribly Wrong: Two California Men Face Felony Charges for Snapping $200K Tusk off Woolly Mammoth Museum Exhibit

Virginia Dems send sweeping gun ban to Spanberger as West Virginia weighs expanding machine-gun access

Vance touts Trump economy gains during North Carolina tour, cites rising home purchases

Former Gettysburg mayor arrested on child sex abuse charges weeks after resignation

Breaking: Jasmine Crockett Security Officer Shot, Killed by SWAT Team

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020