Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

House Democrats Flip, Join Republicans to Overturn Biden-Era Regulation

Trump Issues Stern Mandate, Tells Tech Titans They Will Not Run Up American Utility Bills

Johnson: ‘No boots on the ground’ for Trump’s Greenland acquisition plans amid military speculation

Trump flips off Ford factory worker who yelled ‘pedophile protector’

Rubio says US can’t return 137 deported Venezuelans due to ‘delicate’ negotiations with Maduro’s successor

11 House Dems buck party to side with Republicans in reversal of Biden-era shower regulation

College basketball player gunned down on Nashville freeway, police hunting for suspects

‘Dilbert’ Creator and Right-Wing Commentator Scott Adams Dies at Age 68

Iran goes dark as regime unleashes force, cyber tools to crush protests

Afghan illegal immigrant who stabbed sister for being ‘bad Muslim girl’ arrested by ICE agents in New York

Lawmakers warn Philly officials against prosecuting ICE agents: ‘That’s not how America works’

Republican Congressman Forced to Close Office After ‘Credible Threats and Calls for Violence’

Newsom blasts proposed California billionaire tax but keeps door open to national debate

BREAKING: Republican House Oversight Committee to Hold Bill Clinton in Contempt

Watch: Whoopi Goldberg Attempts to Walk Back Vicious Anti-ICE Comment After Thinking It Over During Commercial Break

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020