Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Breaking: After Attack of Cargo Vessel, Trump Directs US to Escort Foreign Ships Through Hormuz

Supreme Court Declines to Make Ruling in Case of ‘Socially Transitioned’ Florida Child

Latest Trump assassination attempt exposes ‘educated assassins’ moral crisis, university president says

ATF to Bring Back Sanity and Reject ‘Gender Identity’ on Gun Background Checks

Ridglan Farms beagles begin leaving Wisconsin facility after rescue groups strike deal for release

Christian School Wins Enormous Settlement After Its Team Refuses to Face Team With ‘Trans’ Player

The Democrats who are scrambling after Florida passed DeSantis’s map gerrymander

Cole Allen’s defense lawyers say he has been removed from suicide watch

Patel says FBI has cut bureaucracy, moved 1,000 agents to field offices in ‘generational’ overhaul

Dem Senate candidate Sherrod Brown claims he supports ‘closing the border’; GOP says record proves otherwise

Dem Deletes X Posts After Trashing State She Is Seeking to Represent

Steak n’ Shake Worker Murdered Over Argument About Onion Rings

Obama-era ‘clean energy’ solar power plant still uses fossil fuels – and kills thousands of birds annually

ActBlue sues Texas AG Ken Paxton, alleging political retaliation over Democrats’ fundraising

School Officer Stops Armed Teenager Before He Enters Building

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020