Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Pure Evil: Missouri Mother Pleads Out After Baking Tiny Baby to Death in Oven – Her Sentence Proves Society Has Lost Its Way

Illegal alien allegedly grabs school police officer’s gun, shoots him in femoral artery: DOJ

Previously Deported Illegal Alien Charged with Horrific Crimes Against Louisiana Child

Michigan student confronts El-Sayed over Iran stance in tense exchange: ‘Do you stand with us?’

Soft-on-Crime DA Called ‘Bloody Mary’ Caught Trying to Toss Child-Killer’s Life Sentence Because It’s Just Not Fair

Tylenol murders mystery deepens after sheriff’s office solves decades-old ‘Unknown Wanderer’ cold case

Woke Liberal Busted Pretending to Be Palestinian Apologizes: ‘I Am a White Woman of Significant Privilege’

Local Virginia GOP chair says Arlington County officials prioritize illegal immigrants over public safety

PHOTOS: Trump rolls out the red carpet and a B-1 flyover for Xi’s arrival

Judge questions whether national security concerns could ever justify Trump’s press ban

Hawley zeroes in on Lia Thomas locker room controversy: ‘Did they consent?’

Inside GOP Senate hopeful’s financial ties to controversial data center boom

Florida plastic surgeon found guilty of murdering attorney who vanished from bloody office

Check Your Kitchen: Tons of Beef, Pork Recalled Over Fake USDA Inspection Stamps

GOP hopeful removes ‘Pro-Trump’ mention from campaign slogan in deep-red seat

See also Barry Melrose, 1956-2026

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020