Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Interior Department heralds algae treatment in Reflecting Pool, comparing it to ‘destroyed’ Iranian navy

Several Trump-Endorsed Candidates Score Big Primary Wins, One Suffers a Close Loss

Hegseth announces 6-month review of American forces in Europe, blasts NATO allies for putting troops ‘at risk’

MLB accused of ‘double standard’ after calling out players’ Bible messages despite backing BLM in 2020

Race Hustlers Are About to Scream About Police Shooting This Little Boy – Don’t Let Them Start in the Middle of the Story

Iran peace deal inspires little celebration as US banks on ‘good behavior’ and ‘understanding’ from Tehran

Florida couple reaches agreement with daughter’s biological parents after alleged IVF mix-up

Florida court says 18-year-olds have same gun rights as other adults

DHS moves all detainees out of ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ amid hurricane concerns

LaGuardia shuts down runway for second time in weeks after pavement issue resurfaces

Man killed after horse-drawn carriage bolts and flips near popular New York City tourist destination

Shocking Report: ‘250,000 Young White Girls’ Victimized by Muslim Rape Gangs

MUST SEE: ICE Officer Lifts Drowning Child Out of Water, Then Saves His Life with CPR – Dems Call People Like Him ‘Gestapo’

Trump switches support in Oklahoma congressional race as formerly endorsed pastor candidate suspends campaign

Trump-endorsed congressional candidate pledges entire $174K salary to wounded Iraq War veteran’s family

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020