Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Artists cancel New Year’s Eve shows following ‘Trump–Kennedy Center’ rebrand

Republicans eye Iowa Senate supermajority in Tuesday special election

Australian authorities say Bondi Beach suspects with Islamic State flags not part of ‘terrorist cell’

Saudi Arabia strikes Mukalla port over ‘extremely dangerous’ actions by ally UAE

Minnesota Dem Senate candidate faces call from opponent to apologize over viral ‘pandering’ hijab video

Corporate Media Outlets Turning a Blind Eye to Minnesota Fraud Involving Somalis

Minnesota State-Licensed ‘Day Care’ Has Listed Number Taking You To Tim Walz’s Office

Fetterman endorses prospect of potential future strikes to derail any Iranian nuclear ambitions

Armed Americans fight back: Inside 2025’s most gripping self-defense shootings across the US

2025 Most Memorable Heartwarming Moments: December 30, 2025

Trump’s latest funding cuts dampen bipartisan dealmaking in 2026

Trump’s Top 10 Campaign Promises Fulfilled in First Year

Walz allies led state agencies that oversaw massive alleged Somali daycare fraud

Texas antifa terrorism case: Confessions mount as Trump DOJ clinches more convictions

Eric Adams says Biden DOJ used ‘lawfare’ against him, compares treatment to Trump

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020