Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

California leaders mum on $1B high-speed rail detour aimed at preserving disgraced labor leader’s memorial

Research Team Reveals the Secret of Ancient Biblical Manuscript

After NASCAR’s Greg Biffle And Family Died, Police Think ‘Friends’ Stole from Them

State Department fires back at accusations of ‘empty planes’ rescuing Americans from conflict zones

Inside the coming battle over Virginia’s abortion ballot referendum

Iowa woman died following hernia repair after nurses dismissed painful post-surgery symptoms: lawsuit

Shooting during party at Oklahoma’s Arcadia Lake leaves at least 10 wounded, police say

Marco Rubio spotted behind DJ booth at family wedding as social media reacts to viral clip

Breaking: Rudy Giuliani in ‘Critical Condition’ at Florida Hospital

Rudy Giuliani hospitalized in critical but stable condition: ‘He’s fighting’

Man accused of biting infant during erratic dash through businesses before restaurant arrest

Breaking: After Attack of Cargo Vessel, Trump Directs US to Escort Foreign Ships Through Hormuz

Supreme Court Declines to Make Ruling in Case of ‘Socially Transitioned’ Florida Child

Company Orders Recall of Chocolate Sold Nationwide After Potentially Dangerous Ingredient Included

Latest Trump assassination attempt exposes ‘educated assassins’ moral crisis, university president says

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020