Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Lindsay Clancy Fangirls Push Child Killer’s GoFundMe Total to Staggering $1.1M Following Mistrial

Taxpayers Footed the Bill for Nearly $500M in Food Stamps at California Fast Food Joints

Judge allows ‘homewrecker’ lawsuit against former Sen Kyrsten Sinema to move forward

Detransitioner takes malpractice fight to appeals court after North Carolina law change

Trump weighs in on Lindsay Clancy murder trial dubbed ‘kangaroo court’ by GOP leaders

Here Comes the Bride – In Water Nearly Up to Her Waist

Arizona voter-law fight reaches SCOTUS as election groups warn ‘absurd’ consequence could ensue

Dunkin’ Opened a Drive-Thru Lane Just for Dogs — And It Was Pure Joy

Well-connected Dem operative learns fate after FBI busts him in child sex abuse sting

California McDonald’s Shootout Turns Deadly as Police Arrive: Turns Out the Perpetrator Was an Employee

How Stepdad Firefighter Learned of 911 Call in Most Painful Way Possible

Ex-Fetterman staffers promise more damaging details after blistering report: ‘Tip of the iceberg’

NJ mayor demands sanctuary policy rollback after baby killed in crash allegedly involving illegal immigrant

Patrick Clancy speaks out after hung jury in Lindsay Clancy case, addresses prospect of another trial

‘Black widow’ allegedly attempted to murder romantic partner, 69, she met online

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020