Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule

Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories

FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police

Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep

Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’

Obama Presidential Library Betrays Black Visitors, Issues Wildly Racist Demand on Website – at Least We’ve Been Told It’s Racist

Hundreds dead as Europe breaks temperature records during heat wave

Senate Republican pushes overhaul to cut red tape and speed up American energy projects

Mamdani and Hochul announce cash infusion for New York City Abortion Access Hub expansion

Michigan childcare provider collected $1.1M in taxpayer funds despite no visible signs of operating

Clinton judge gives anti-ICE agitator no prison time for assaulting federal officers in Minneapolis

Freedom 250’s Great American State Fair kicks off 16-day festival on National Mall: ‘America come to life’

Trump Media battles Brazilian government in novel censorship case

DOJ threatens to sue California over ‘Glock ban,’ arguing law violates Second Amendment

Former New Jersey middle school teacher indicted on new charges including manufacturing child abuse material

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020