Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

GOP Rep Nancy Mace introduces ‘Death Penalty for Child Rapists Act’

Nancy Mace says ‘unhinged’ Hillary Clinton erupted during closed-door Epstein deposition

Starmer blasts ‘extreme’ and ‘sectarian’ Green Party after brutal election defeat

BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Reportedly Started ‘Screaming’ and Became ‘Unhinged’ During Epstein Deposition, Which Is Set to Air on C-SPAN

Nancy Pelosi Makes Absurd Claim That Trump Hates America: Presidents Have ‘All Been Patriots Until Now’

Susie Wiles’ lawyer denies approving FBI recording, says he’d lose license over ‘stunt’

Watch: Doorbell Camera Catches Toddler Barely Escaping Aggressive Coyote in the Middle of Los Angeles County

Agency that nabbed ‘El Chapo,’ ‘Diddy’ threatened as Democrats’ DHS shutdown drags on

Watch: Black Panelist Mops Floor with White Lib Who Seems to Think Black Americans Don’t Know How to Get ID

Registered sex offender’s city council bid sparks fury as officials explore blocking his path

Where Iran’s ballistic missiles can reach — and how close they are to the US

Swalwell campaign sets off alarm bells after accepting $25K donation from CCP-tied lawyer: ‘Outrageous’

California’s vulnerable House Republicans swap districts and strategize ahead of primary

Bill Clinton faces high-stakes House grilling in Epstein probe and more top headlines

Senate GOP sends warning to House SAVE Act agitators: Don’t tell us what to do

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020