Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Ex-Dem Legislator Arrested Over Child Porn, But It’s 7 Words from FBI Investigator That Will Make You Sick to Your Stomach

Hunter Biden Blasts CNN’s Jake Tapper as a ‘Poor Journalist’ and a Terrible Person in NSFW Comments

Dem’s stunning ideal standard for immigration detention conditions resurfaces amid Texas senate bid

Secret Service agent on JD Vance’s detail investigated for allegedly leaking operational security info

From the dugout to the White House: LA Dodgers celebrate World Series glory with Trump

Video: Trump Greets Fallen Heroes at Dignified Transfer for Troops Killed in Iran Conflict

GOP rallies around Thune after White House says Trump’s patience is ‘running out’

Six-figure private security bill for top Dem Senate hopeful fuels GOP hypocrisy claims

Former Biden Admin Official Roasts Kamala’s 2028 Chances on Fox News: ‘She Follows’

Defense industry leaders align with Trump admin plans in closed-door strategy session on Iran war funding

Justice Department withdraws subpoenas to New York Times reporters

Nancy Guthrie mystery: ‘Today’ show intruder sparks security shakeup at NBC studio

WATCH: ‘Shocking’ Ben Franklin smear leaves Smithsonian chief with ‘no regrets’

Former CIA Director James Woolsey, Who Served Under Clinton and Later Advised Trump, Dies at 84

Vance Boelter sentenced for shootings of Minnesota lawmakers and spouses

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020