Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Report: ‘Positive’ Development in US-Iran Talks as Clock Ticks Toward Deadline

Trump DOJ Says Not So Fast as Mamdani Announces ‘Racial Equity Plan’

Trump calls into Vance-Orban Hungary event: ‘My kind of people’

Ex-Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene joins left-wing calls for the 25th amendment as Iran deadline nears

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Floats New Tactic for Cracking Down on Sanctuary Cities

MTG cites 25th Amendment as she calls out Trump over Iran

Daughter of missing American woman in Bahamas says there were ‘prior issues,’ calls for full investigation

Aaron Rupar, Trump-Obsessed Lib Clip Farmer, Gets Glowing Profile From One of UK’s Most Prestigious Papers

Indianapolis official’s home attacked after vote in favor of controversial data center

Trump admin terminates some agreements with districts, college on transgender students

Probe to snare Iran rescue leaker ‘underway’ as Trump threatens jail for imperiling arduous operation

Alert: According to Trump Only a Few Hours Remain Until He May Obliterate Iran from the Map in a Single Night

Democrats squirm as the Left embraces controversial streamer Hasan Piker

Trump Endorses Ex-Fox News Host for Governor’s Race

Ilhan Omar calls Trump an ‘unhinged lunatic,’ urges booting him out of office

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020