Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

After Years of Bashing Straight, Christian, White Men, Dems Reportedly Conclude They Need One to Win WH

Florida Supreme Court keeps ex-cop’s execution on hold after DNA test fails to give a clear answer

Experts Respond to Claims That the Bullet That Killed Charlie Kirk ‘Did Not Match the Rifle’ Allegedly Used by Tyler Robinson

Wisconsin mother stabs teen daughter to death to ‘protect’ her from Elon Musk: authorities

Trump signs executive order overhauling mail-in voting in major election integrity push

Alert: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Build Ballroom, Even with Private Donations, Without Outside Approval

Breaking: Markets Skyrocket as Trump Looks to Iran Endgame, With the Dow up Over 1,000 Points, S&P Booming

State Department Reopens Embassy in Venezuela Following Maduro Capture

Trump says he will attend Supreme Court oral arguments on birthright citizenship challenge

Illegal alien murder suspect avoided system as ICE pushes Dem governor to keep him locked up

Insanity: Far-Left Backlash Halts Mural Honoring Train Stabbing Victim Iryna Zarutska, Dem Mayor Calls Work ‘Divisive’

Kristi Noem, Trump respond to shocking cross-dressing photos tied to her husband

Feeding Our Future fraudster sentenced to just one year in prison by judge committed to ‘combating racism’

Dem gubernatorial candidate racked up eye-popping travel bill as AG during 400+ days traveling out of state

Trump floats dragging Congress back during spring recess to end shutdown — but one hurdle stands in the way

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020