Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Social media erupts over Mamdani’s silence after Brooklyn coffee shop bans Jewish congressman

MLB Issues Unexpected Response on Players With Bible Verses on Uniforms, Says They Will Never Be Fined

Air traffic control audio captures tense moment two planes nearly collided at Boston Logan Airport

Foreign Born Biden Judge Named ‘Sparkle’ Strikes Down Trump Database to Purge Illegal Voters Because It Purges Voters

Swalwell pal accused of using campaign cash to bankroll ‘luxury lifestyle’ — including Super Bowl tickets

Savannah Guthrie pleads for tips as ransom note claims mom is dead: ‘Somebody knows something’

Zohran Mamdani tries to remake the Big Apple’s congressional delegation

Music Library Curator’s Career Hits High Note with Discovery of ‘New’ Mozart Manuscript

Trump endorses John James in Michigan governor race as GOP rival exits primary

GRAPHIC: One of the Absolute Worst Rape Gang Incidents Involved Baseball Bat, Hot Brand, Red Ball, and Special ‘Pump,’ But Never Made It Into the Report

A tale of two parties: Trump, Mamdani put political clout on the line as four states hold primaries

Why Britain’s prime ministerial doom loop will continue until immigration reform is fixed

Connecticut dad jumped to his death during concert at Madison Square Garden in NYC: report

Coast Guard helicopter crashes during Alaska training mission, injuring four crew members

BREAKING: Heartbreak in Nancy Guthrie Case as Note Believed to Be from Kidnappers Confirms She Is Dead

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020