Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Watchdogs seek unredacted Maryland records for ex-Des Moines superintendent arrested by ICE

Democratic campaigns provide financial lifeline to Chinese influence operation

Mamdani dodges question on socialism vote ahead of high-stakes meeting with Trump

John Bolton’s trial still far off as judge grills DOJ over lengthy discovery process

Zelensky says Ukraine faces ‘most intense’ pressure to accept deal or risk losing US support

NeverTrump ‘Conservative’ George Conway Eyes Dem Nadler’s NYC Seat, With Not-So Surprising Twist

BREAKING: Trump Admin Issues Ultimatum to Zelenskyy: Sign Peace Deal by Thanksgiving, Or Else

Trump flips Dems’ ‘affordability’ script, turning buzzword into MAGA material as Mamdani visit looms

As ICE readies ‘Swamp Sweep,’ Mississippi pledges to aid — not block — federal crackdown

Watch: The Priceless 30 Seconds Where Rep. Comer Forces Dems to Listen to Hakeem Jeffries Beg Epstein for Cash

Unearthed FEC records expose Katie Porter’s hypocrisy after she fumes at ‘new billionaire’ joining race

Biden’s DOJ subpoenaed top Republican’s phone records and more top headlines

Coast Guard defends dropping hate label for swastikas, nooses, Confederate flags

Miss Palestine’s Connection to Notorious Hamas Leader Exposed Ahead of Beauty Pageant: Report

Quite the Pickle: California Town Seeks to Permanently Ban Popular Pastime

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020