Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Jack Smith withheld names from judges who greenlit GOP lawmakers’ phone records access

Trump tells Colorado governor and district attorney to ‘rot in Hell’ over Tina Peters incarceration

Germany’s Merz says Europe must ‘defend and assert’ interests amid ‘changing’ relations with US

Somali daycare in Minnesota broken into, key documents stolen in overnight burglary

Blue cities U-turn on distributing drug supplies to addicts after progressive policies fail to stem epidemic

President Trump Has a Backup Plan if the Supreme Court Strikes Down His Tariffs

Treasury targets oil traders, tankers accused of helping Maduro evade U.S. sanctions

Ex-police officer given prison time in case prosecuted under Soros DA sees conviction overturned a year later

Trump Presides Over the Largest One-Year Drop in Homicides Ever Recorded

CNN Finally Shows Up at Minneapolis Day Care, But for All the Wrong Reasons

Why the Times Square Ball Will Drop Twice This Year for the First Time Ever

San Francisco mayor quietly signs reparations fund that could lead to $5M payments per person

Boebert hits back at Trump after veto of Colorado water bill, raises retaliation concerns

Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders

Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020