Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

The Way to Save Education Is Through School Choice

Christians Are Being Hunted Like Sport

Platner supporter Khanna calls Senate hopeful’s past relationships ‘toxic,’ but says he deserves ‘redemption’

Six Flags Bans Popular YouTuber ‘For Life’ After Viral Chicken McNugget Video

National Park Service ranger dies after falling into crevasse on Mount McKinley during climbing patrol

USDA Secretary Faces Lawsuit for Explicitly Christian Messages to Employees

Ex-CIA official stole $40 million in gold by making fake top-secret spy program

Top House Democrat says there’s ‘no way’ Platner didn’t know tattoo’s Nazi origins

Michigan athlete lured by Snapchat message before being shot, dumped in lake while still alive

Trump Offers Timeline for When Gas Prices Will Start Dropping Again

Former Indiana Rep Stephen Buyer receives full pardon from Trump for 2023 insider trading conviction

The Dubious Legal Theory That Could Make Life Even More Expensive For Americans

Trump moves to slash intelligence office ahead of permanent chief’s arrival

Democrats are running on working-class résumés. Republicans question the credentials

Why do we feel beckoned by ‘Backrooms?’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020