Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

California DOGE leader slams Newsom, Bonta over state’s massive fraud issues: “Every day is opposite day”

Mississippi middle schoolers stop runaway bus after driver loses consciousness from asthma attack

Correspondents’ dinner chaos hits high-profile guests already marked by political violence

Who is Cole Allen? California man named as suspect in White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting

Breaking: WH Correspondents’ Dinner Shooter Identified, Appears to Be Kamala Harris Donor on Public Listing

Trump strikes defiant tone after another shooting: ‘I can’t be concerned’

WH Correspondents’ Dinner Cancelled After Shooting Despite Trump Wanting the Show to Go on

Secret Service in line of fire at WHCA shooting still unpaid due to Dem-led shutdown

Man charged security checkpoint and shot Secret Service agent at White House correspondents’ dinner: Trump

Trump rushed from same hotel where Reagan assassination attempt unfolded in 1981

Breaking: Shooter Reportedly Shot Dead or Apprehended at WH Correspondents Dinner with Trump in Attendance

Breaking: Shots Reportedly Fired at WH Correspondents Dinner, Trump and Melania Rushed Out

Trump shares details on ‘very sick person’ who fired shots at White House Correspondents’ Dinner

Trump and Cabinet members evacuated from correspondents’ dinner after shooting

King Charles to meet Mamdani in New York during US state visit next week

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020