Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Where the Trump admin’s court fight over National Guard in DC stands in wake of shooting

Slotkin goes silent when pressed on past Trump guard ‘shooting’ claims after DC attack

In-store Black Friday crowds underwhelm as online shopping surges

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: School grapples with ‘whiteness,’ OnlyFans lecture, Thanksgiving turmoil

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Anna Kepner’s mystery, Alex Murdaugh’s stage, Martha Moxley’s case runs cold

National Guard shooting suspect charged with murder: What to know

Amy Klobuchar Ratioed After Trying to Pin High Prices on Trump – Her Graph Shows Biden’s Entire Term Instead

Family, service, and a break from the ‘s— show’: Lawmakers share what they’re grateful for this Thanksgiving

An Important Question We Don’t Ask Often Enough: As an American Why Should I Care What Any Foreign Power or People Think?

‘Squad’ member mourns ’empty’ Thanksgiving seats due to ‘loved ones abducted & deported,’ ‘mass incarceration’

It’s Starting Already: As Mob Beat Multiple NYC Citizens, 911 Operators Told Residents to Call ‘Quality of Life Team’

Trump Launches AI ‘Manhattan Project’: It Might Overwhelm the Power Grid

American cruise ship passenger goes missing on island tour

Father of fallen National Guard member calls her death a ‘horrible tragedy’ in heartbreaking post

Entire UPS Fleet of Planes Grounded After Fatal Crash

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020