Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Judge denies Fulton County bid to retrieve 2020 ballots seized by FBI

Backlash erupts over viral video of CAIR leader as Newsom funding draws scrutiny

Kentucky man enters insanity plea after admitting to beating his grandmother to death in recorded attack

California immigration judge sues DOJ, alleging she was fired for being a registered Democrat, a woman over 40

Trump’s Psychedelic Push May Open a Door Christians Should Question

Schumer’s ‘No. 1 target’ says voters will see her Democrat Senate challenger as too extreme

Leftist Influencer’s Mangione Celebration Resurfaces After He Opposes Death Penalty for Child Murderer

Justice Neil Gorsuch breaks silence on violent threats against judiciary, Supreme Court leaks

Louisiana bill expands first-degree murder charges and death penalty eligibility after mall shooting

Obama Presidential Center looks to ‘put presidency in context’ as tickets sell out

BREAKING: Here’s the Alleged Jeffrey Epstein Suicide Note Just Released by a Federal Judge

International Battle Erupts Over Disease-Stricken Cruise Ship as Another Case of Deadly Virus Is Confirmed

DOJ investigating left-wing Fairfax County prosecutor over alleged unlawful discrimination

DOJ dangles massive signing bonuses for lawyers ready to fight ‘lawless’ cities far beyond DC

Rubio heads to Rome amid Trump’s unpopular feud with Pope Leo

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020