Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Warren’s latest ‘kiss of death’ endorsement sparks mockery over disastrous political picks

Illegal immigrant who murdered Michigan woman sues Trump, demands $75M, public apology, US citizenship

Craziest Video You’ll See Today: Trans Adult Jumps Like Toddler After ‘Misgendering,’ Dares Cop to Arrest Him, Then the Fun Starts

Democrats Make Graham Platner Replacement All But Official – Not Everyone Is Pleased

Gunman charged after wounding 9 in Tucson nightlife shooting before cop takes him down

‘Long Island Lolita’ Amy Fisher’s son charged as cops probe possible microwave link in cat’s killing

Timeline: All the incidents where US troops have been killed during the Iran war

Lindsey Graham succession fight upended as Trump’s chosen successor jumps in

Christian Apologist Forced to Move After Muslims Prove His Point

Did JD Vance Tuck a Hidden Reference in His New Son’s Name?

The American dream now comes with a ZIP code: Here’s where starter homes are still within reach

War erupts on far left as DSA endorses challenger against sitting House progressive

Mamdani’s ‘deranged’ Israel take resurfaces as he targets Netanyahu

Houthis declare naval blockade of Saudi Arabia, escalating crisis

Trump shares first picture of JD Vance’s baby boy

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020