Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

What the Data Actually Says About Abortion and Women’s Health

California’s New Congressional Maps Favoring Dems Could Be Struck Down by the Supreme Court: Report

Oct. 7 Exhibit Sign in London Removed After Police Warn It Could Attract Terrorists

Breaking: OJ Simpson Witness and LAPD Detective Mark Fuhrman Dead at 74

Report: Immigrants Are Voluntarily Leaving US in Record Numbers Under Trump

DC Bar lawyer withdraws from Ed Martin disciplinary case after partisan posts surface

Hegseth unleashes on Massie in GOP primary showdown against Trump-backed Navy SEAL vet

The New Democrats: MI Dem Blasted for Campaigning with Twerking Videos, Own Mugshots

Austin shooting suspect named, timeline of terror revealed after teens’ alleged 28-hour, 12-attack rampage

Mark Fuhrman, detective at center of OJ Simpson murder trial, dead at 74

Senate Republicans confirm nearly 50 of Trump’s picks for energy, land management

WATCH: Mamdani bashed for going ‘full deranged marxist’ with rip on famous Ronald Reagan line

Breaking: 2 Shooters at California Islamic Center Neutralized – Multiple Causalities Confirmed

Trump Sends First of Its Kind Message to ‘Rededicate 250’ Attendees Who Flooded the National Mall to Recommit America to God

Skid Row election scheme allegedly fueled by pocket-change payoffs busted by Trump DOJ

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020