Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Jesse Watters Asks Todd Blanche Point-Blank If He Thinks Bondi Mishandled Epstein Files

Hegseth Says Service Members May Carry Firearms on Military Bases Reversing Dangerous Biden Policy

Jewish Europeans face deteriorating ‘normal’ as advocates warn spiking antisemitism a ‘mutating virus’

TEVI TROY: Trump faces the burdens of a wartime presidency

Daughters’ relentless search shatters ‘overdose’ claim, leads to arrest in mom’s 1992 murder

Three people hospitalized after city bus crashes into popular DC restaurant: officials

Democrat Lawmakers Move to Ban Napkins, Utensils in Take Out Food Orders

Blackmon: Competition, Not Monopoly Control, The Answer To Grid Reliability

ICE arrests relatives of slain Iranian general Soleimani living in US after Rubio revokes their green cards

Older Drivers Could Be Forced to Take Road Test Again for License Renewal in Key Swing State

Watch: Punk Thinks He Can Steal from Tip Jar While Owner’s Back Is Turned – Has No Idea the Internet’s Watching Live and Nailed Him Immediately

Trump unveils $1.5T defense surge, deep domestic cuts — what’s on the budget chopping block

One of America’s prettiest cities scrambles to reclaim storybook streets from homeless camps, drug dens

British Actor Who Mocked Christianity Receives Scorn for Mourning Rise of Islam

Child of Chinese illegal immigrants charged with planting explosive at US military base

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020