Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Congressional baseball game offers longstanding traditions, and plenty of confusion

11 skydivers, one pilot killed in Missouri plane crash near airport

Sen Mitch McConnell hospitalized, ‘receiving excellent care,’ his office says

Republican leaders embrace viral World Cup fans they say are discovering the ‘real America’

Gabbard says declassified biolab records validate concerns previously dismissed as misinformation

Another One: German Woman Beheaded, Homeless African Male Arrested for Murder Earlier in 2026

Is AI Making Your Kids Dumber? Over Half of Teachers Surveyed Say It May Be

Spy Agencies Have Exploded in Size – Trump’s Intel Chiefs Are the First to Downsize

Evil Among Us: Black Magic Suspected After Cameras Capture Goat Being Dragged Into Office Building, Then More Chilling Pics Found Online

From Wasserman Schultz to Goldman, Democratic incumbents are fighting for survival

WATCH: Chinese Clown Robot Nails Innocent Child – Some Say Video Is Sign of Dystopian Nightmare

You Won’t Believe What Novelty Item This Blue-County Councilman Wants to Ban

These 11 upcoming Supreme Court decisions could make or break Trump’s second term agenda

Secret evidence filed in Anna Kepner Carnival cruise murder case as feds push to jail accused stepbrother

Chinese Spies May Be Stalking You on Your Job Hunt

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020