Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump administration’s immigration push fuels ICE’s biggest arrest month in agency history

Citadel cadet, childhood friend gunned down in vacant Florida lot as police launch manhunt

Dem senator accuses Pentagon of murder with boat strikes targeting drug traffickers

GOP lawmaker’s gifts, ‘effusive affection’ toward young staffers detailed in explosive ethics report

Muslim Assailants Kill Church Elder, At Least 20 Other Christians, In Targeted Attacks

Breaking: Todd Blanche Nomination Poised to Succeed as Two GOP Holdouts Flip

Board of Peace demands Netanyahu cease Gaza airstrikes as Israel refuses to comply with peace plan

Denmark’s military conscription ‘expanded and strengthened’ as tensions mount with DC and Moscow

Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric

FIRST ON FOX: Trump to open direct line with military families in ground-up readiness push

Outrage over noncitizens allegedly voting in elections ignites probe into Garden State Dems

To Secure AG Job, Blanche Kills off Anti-Weaponization Fund Designed to Compensate Victims of Gov’t Witch Hunts, Like Most J6ers

Nancy Guthrie ransom notes release follows Unabomber ‘precedent’ that cracked case, expert says

SEE IT: Dashcam shows Florida trooper chasing alleged street takeover suspect at 140 mph

Chris ‘Fredo’ Cuomo Tries Playing Tough Guy for Anthony Fauci, Gets Nuked By Social Media

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020