Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Florida AG Warns NFL Against Race-Based Diversity Hiring

Newsom Claims TPUSA Influencer Is Gay — Just One Month After He Followed Apparent Gay Hooker With Username ‘F***s4Drugs’

TSA warns of ‘longstanding’ shutdown fallout even after funding clears, and a major event could make it worse

Key Trump agency unleashes probe on blue state over potential race-based mortgage aid: ‘DEI is dead’

John Fetterman’s unapologetic maverick mantra: ‘My vote is not for sale’

Missing woman’s sister says Nancy Guthrie case now a ‘hope roller coaster’ for family as search continues

Illegal immigrant accused of groping girls at Virginia high school facing new charges

New Jersey Gov Sherrill signs law barring ICE agents from wearing face coverings to shield identities

Trump admin makes new criminal referrals to DOJ targeting New York AG Letitia James

Gorman family calls out Johnson and Pritzker following college student’s killing in Chicago

DOJ settles with Michael Flynn over Russia probe after wrongful prosecution claim: ‘Historic injustice’

Cop on trial denies gunning for fellow officer in clash at home; prosecutors argue lethal risk was real

US moves airborne troops, Marines as Iran rejects ceasefire, raising ground war potential

House Budget chairman reveals how Republicans will pay for the Iran campaign

Court Rules Illegal Aliens Can Be Locked Up Without Bond

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020