Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Republicans blast Democrats’ Trump election meddling claims as hypocritical ‘conspiracy theory’

Mounds of Snow and Trash Are Just the Opening Act of Mamdani’s Collectivist New York

Who is Kyle Wagner? Meet the self-identified Antifa member arrested after targeting ICE

Maryland Man Charged with Attempting to Murder Trump Administration Official

Suicide bomber kills dozens at Shiite mosque in Pakistan

Benghazi terror suspect extradited to face US charges

It’s AOC’s Party Now: Bernie-Backed Far-Leftist Could Win Dem Nomination to Replace ‘Moderate’ Sherrill in NJ

12 Minneapolis anti-ICE agitators arrested after massive crowd gathers outside Hilton hotel

First Nancy Guthrie Ransom Note Deadline Expires: ‘Do the Right Thing’

Shapiro fires back at DHS, says truck driver accused in deadly crash had legal status in database

RNC rolls out ‘powerful’ new TikTok strategy to win over key demographic after Trump’s 2024 success

‘Not Alaska First’: Peltola’s Green New Deal allies draw scrutiny in Alaska Senate bid

Hegseth says US strikes force some cartel leaders to halt drug operations

Can the late shah’s son sell the Trump administration on leading a postcleric regime in Iran?

Proposed California ‘wealth tax’ may backfire on liberal politicians as state’s revenue base dries up

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020