Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump admin tightens vise on student aid fraud in ‘ghost student’ crackdown

‘You Should Be Ashamed’: Trump Unleashes on CBS’ Norah O’Donnell Over Question About WHCD Gunman

Leavitt blames ‘left-wing cult of hatred’ after WHCA Dinner shooting

German chancellor says US is being ‘humiliated’ by Iran

Virginia redistricting ballot amendment faces tense questioning from state Supreme Court

Republicans rush to green light White House ballroom following third Trump assassination scare

Supreme Court hands GOP a redistricting win by striking down lower court block on Texas map

‘One-Door’ Welfare Policy Is a One-Way Street to Welfare Fraud

White House Correspondents’ Dinner Attendees Pinpoint Troubling Security Lapse: ‘We Are Lucky This Wasn’t Far Worse’

Iran Proposes Deal That Would End the War, But Leave the Central Issue Unresolved

DNC vice chair attacks Democratic Sen. John Fetterman: ‘You’re a mess’

DOJ cites White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting in push to drop lawsuit against ballroom

North Dakota state rep, pilot killed in plane crash

What we know about the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting suspect and more top headlines

Fox News Reporter Describes Experiencing Chaos on Stage During Trump Assassination Attempt

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020