Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Judge who blasted Trump as ‘authoritarian’ blocks US from deporting pro-Palestinian campus activists

House Oversight Committee widens investigation into alleged Minnesota fraud

Republican National Committee Moves to Change Party Rules for Unprecedented Midterm Convention

DOJ Accepts Don Lemon’s Challenge as He Says ‘Keep Trying’ to Arrest Me

Iranian prosecutor denies canceling 800 executions as Trump claimed

House GOP slammed by conservatives for joining Dems on controversial ‘kill switch’ amendment

Trump keeps Macron under spotlight as Greenland talks grind forward from Davos

Dem. Rep. Melts down Over Boy, 5, Rescued by ICE – But Where Was She When Biden Left 300k Kids to Sex Trafficking and/or Abandonment?

She Hurt for Him: Priceless Video Shows Woman Behind Jack Smith Looking Like She’s in Physical Pain as GOP Reps Repeatedly Expose Him as Fraud

Trump Yanks ‘Prestigious’ Board of Peace Offer from Canada After War of Words at Davos

Venezuelan national accused of claiming control over Arizona community, threatening residents: report

Former Uvalde school officer says he doesn’t regret actions after not guilty verdict

J6 Cop Coughs Vulgar Curse to Republican Rep During Jack Smith Hearing

Liberal activist groups organize Minneapolis high schoolers to protest against ICE

Border Patrol union chief touts high morale despite clashes with agitators: ‘They are patriotic’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020