Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Police Searching for Second Suspect After Deadly Shooting at Seattle Festival

Episcopal Church Headquarters Forced to Evacuate After Nearby Manhattan Tower Sagged

‘Shame on you’: Sherrill knew voter-roll bombshell was coming when she called Trump a liar, DOJ official says

Trump demands Thune keep Senate in session until SAVE America Act passes

McConnell ‘not yet cleared’ to leave rehab to return to Congress

How the Big Beautiful Bill became law: Trump locks horns with GOP lawmakers

Pentagon Official Is Out After He Told James O’Keefe on Undercover ‘Gay Date’ He Planned to Subvert Trump’s Policies

World’s Dumbest Rapper Arrested for Fraud, But Satanic Discovery and Live ‘Sacrifice’ Found at Home Are Far Worse

Trump admin targets woke schools accused of hiding students’ gender transitions from parents

Exposed Fauci diary shows he estimated COVID-19 death rate to be much lower than what he told Congress

Nancy Guthrie update: 25 weeks after abduction, Elizabeth Smart says there’s ‘reason to have hope’

NBA star rips socialist NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani as ‘mayor playing president’ and more top headlines

Rep Thomas Massie says the Iran war has ‘significantly weakened’ America ‘all for Israel’

How the Big Beautiful Bill became law: Late-night drama in the Senate

Missouri congressional candidate accused of funneling $165,000 from terminated state campaign

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020