Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hegseth shared details of Yemen strikes in second Signal chat: report

Trump’s 14th week will be dominated by crucial trade talks

Trump’s Easter Morning Greeting Is One for the Record Books, And the Last Line Shattered His Enemies

Devastating Plaque Installed on Van Hollen’s Senate Office After His Trip to El Salvador

Schumer’s leadership becomes an issue in 2026 Democratic Senate primaries

Ken Paxton may have run afoul of Texas ethics laws with Senate campaign launch

Florida property owners pestered by spying drones could soon be allowed to fight back with ‘force’

Self-defense claim in Austin Metcalf slaying is ‘uphill battle’: expert

Ohio pastor injured, man killed, in ‘freak accident’ on way home from Bible study

Trump administration plans to pull $1 billion in funding from Harvard amid clash with university: report

Deported illegal alien and suspected MS-13 gang member transferred from notorious El Salvadoran mega-prison

Trump hopeful Russia and Ukraine can make a deal after temporary Easter ceasefire ends

David Hogg donates $100K to DCCC after plan to primary ‘ineffective’ Democrats ignited civil war in party

Climate Nutjobs Target Pet Dogs for Being ‘Environmental Villains’

So Close, Yet So Far: Jimmy Kimmel Actually Nails 1 Reason Trump’s Winning

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020