Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump working to clean ‘filthy’ Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, blames Biden for maintenance delays

Trump calls for second ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1

Watch: Nancy Pelosi Plants Absurd Conspiracy Theory About the 2026 Election

Grand conspiracy investigation into Obama-era officials gains steam in South Florida

Impeach Them All: Rogue Judge Orders Trump to Restore Legal Status to Up to 900,000 Immigrants

Iran launches mass text-based recruitment drive, including minors, to join targeted security forces

Disneyland honors 100-year-old WWII veteran who witnessed iconic Iwo Jima flag raising

Swing-district Democrat faces backlash after vulgar late-night post targeting Trump, doubles down

Trump, Bondi watch historic SCOTUS arguments as justices duel over birthright citizenship

Breaking: Iran Has Requested a Ceasefire, Trump Says

Colorado climber plunges 30 feet after gear ‘failed’ scaling mountainside, rescuers say

Trump Weighing NATO Exit, Slams Alliance as ‘Paper Tiger’ Over Iran Response

Lawmaker says Iran targeted him in phishing attack disguised as TV interview

Florida hospital patient finally leaves room after 5 months amid legal battle

The Votes Are In: JD Vance Absolutely Dominates 2028 GOP Field – 2nd Only to Trump in All Time Support at CPAC

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020