Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump energy czar says Iran conflict gas spike is ‘temporary blip’ as drilling push ramps up

TSA callouts hit Houston, Atlanta, New Orleans hardest, 450 officers have quit nationwide

Chicago Democrat Suggests Woman Murdered by Illegal ‘Startled’ Her Killer, Shares Blame

Massive Explosion Rocks Texas Refinery, Triggers Shelter-in-Place

USC pulls plug on California gubernatorial debate after candidate race controversy

Trump admin rolls out ‘Product of USA’ campaign for American meat, poultry, and egg products

IL Dems decline to defend ‘no’ votes on Laken Riley Act after student’s killing tied to repeat offender

Jack Smith team secretly sought years of Kash Patel phone records, new docs show

CPAC tests Cornyn with offer of speaking slot

Pentagon leaders award 2 Purple Hearts to Old Dominion cadets who took down ISIS supporter

With Midterms and Trump’s Future on the Line, GOP Brags 7-1 Cash Advantage Over Debt-Saddled Democrats

Dem Candidates Keep Getting Weirder: ‘Moderate’ TX Dem Played M*********** Pervert Who Was Supposed to Be Cute in Bizarre Video

Kermit Gosnell, found guilty of murdering infants at Philadelphia abortion clinic, is dead at 85

Lawmakers’ airport perks in crosshairs as DHS shutdown snarls travelers, TSA

Afghanistan frees US citizen Dennis Coyle over a year after Taliban arrest

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020