Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

‘Melrose Place’ and ‘Starship Troopers’ Actor Patrick Muldoon Dies at Age 57

Top House Republican Warns Ilhan Omar That Her Financial Disclosure Revision Won’t Save Her

Federal court upholds Texas law requiring Ten Commandments in public classrooms

DOJ says Southern Poverty Law Center funneled $3M+ to white supremacist and extremist groups

Trump and DeSantis Discuss Appointment to Key Administration Position: Report

Rep. Luna calls for GOP ticket of JD Vance and Marco Rubio in 2028

‘ICON’: Biden DOJ officials privately fawned over Fani Willis as they coordinated on Trump investigation

BREAKING: President Trump Makes Major Announcement About Upcoming Attack on Iran

High school counselor pleads guilty to multiple sex crimes involving teen she was meant to help

Trump says China tried to send ‘gift’ to Iran, undermining his ‘good relationship’ with Xi

Americans among injured at shooting caught on video at tourist hot spot in Mexico

Left-wing group chases proof of Kash Patel’s alleged ‘excessive drinking’ as Dems eye FBI director’s ouster

Omar ducks questions as scrutiny grows over filings that slashed her reported wealth by millions

Breaking: Democratic Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Resigns, Blames House Ethics Committee

Epic: Chip Roy’s ‘MAMDANI Act’ Targets Marxist, Islamist Fanatics with Deportation, Calls Out Radicalism in Immigration

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020