Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it ‘slap in the face’ to SCOTUS

Artemis II crew describes life aboard Orion spacecraft on historic journey to the moon and back

Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt talk free thinking and faith at TPUSA college tour kickoff

Karoline Leavitt reveals ‘anti-climatic’ way Trump told her she’d be press secretary: ‘Oh, by the way’

Trump slaps up to 100% tariff on some brand-name drug imports in major America First push

Two arrested in NC after police find 13-year-old kept in dog kennel, 5 other kids in ‘filthy’ home

Heart-pounding video shows fisherman leaping into ocean to save great white shark

Pete Hegseth signs memo opening door for troops to carry personal firearms on bases

Illegal migrant babysitter accused in 5-year-old attack now faces major charges

Florida, Mississippi join wave of states tightening voter citizenship rules

Trump Announces Plan to Help DHS Workers in Spite of ‘Radical Left’ Shutdown

Trump 2027 budget preview hints at sweeping scale-up in core agenda

Report: The Last Straw That Led to Trump Firing Pam Bondi Had to Do with Eric Swalwell

Gradual erosion of confidence led to Pam Bondi’s abrupt ouster

FBI Warns Congress of ‘Major’ Cyber Hack Involving China That Could Threaten National Security

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020