Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Thousands missing from dozens of countries after Nepal flooding

Iran and Oman come to agreement to open Strait of Hormuz, but await US buy-in

Newsom: ‘I Didn’t Even Know’ Home Had 5,000-Bottle Wine Cellar

Charles Barkley Takes Major Stand With Sophie Cunningham, Enes Kanter on Trans Players – ‘It’s in the Title: WNBA’

Democrats’ redistricting push in blue state hits legal snag

Dolly Parton Was Packing Heat, Recounted Fending Off Harasser with Gun in Resurfaced Clip

Meet the Literally Godless ‘Pro-Extinctionists’ Who Want to Exterminate Human Life Everywhere

Iowa Dem gubernatorial candidate says he would not want Biden or Harris to campaign for him

Spanberger AG draws fire over two-front fight against Trump enforcement agenda

Gender equity, DEI, climate action: How the Smithsonian’s woke push ‘infiltrated’ America’s most beloved Zoo

Man accused of using fake Chief Justice Roberts signature to get own criminal case dismissed

Lindsay Clancy didn’t show ‘break with reality’ as jury weighs psychosis defense: Susan Smith prosecutor

El Sayed has ‘no plans’ to campaign with Hasan Piker after antisemitism concerns

Armed man arrested at Trump golf course allegedly had first lady’s schedule, notes on Secret Service: reports

ATF investigates ‘major’ cybersecurity incident as ransomware group claims attack

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020