Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Breaking: DHS Identifies 278,000 Foreigners Illegally Registered to Vote in Federal Elections

‘Shadow government’: Trump claims intel community bragged about hiding Chinese meddling

Trump releases declassified election intelligence, says it reveals ‘shocking vulnerabilities’

Video shows Canadian illegal alien slapping teen over Trump, ICE clothing: DHS

EXCLUSIVE: DHS seeks custody of illegal immigrant charged with murder after Trump deportation, Biden release

New York Democrat Pat Ryan pledges to refund AIPAC money. It could cost him $790,000

Fetterman Draws a Red Line on What Would Cause Him to Quit the Democratic Party

White House addresses growing parasite outbreak after more than 400 Americans sickened

More than a quarter-million noncitizens may be registered to vote in 4 key states, DHS alleges

Retiring GOP Sen. Tillis Vows to Block SAVE America Act Any Way He Can: ‘I Will Use Every Device’

‘A Disgrace’: White House Teleprompter Operator Placed on Leave After Alleged Scheme Uncovered

Secret Service says ‘we have to’ remove swords from statues near White House

Details of Todd Blanche’s behind-the-scenes meeting with Angel Mom revealed after Capitol Hill testimony

FBI investigating after ICE headquarters in Phoenix riddled with gunfire

Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020