Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Vance’s midterm message: Don’t elect ‘crazy people’ responsible for higher prices

Hope: Remember How the 2018 Blue Wave Fizzled? Turns Out Dems’ 2026 Numbers Aren’t Even Half What They Were Then

Mamdani tells Trump banned White House outlets are welcome at NYC meeting

Maryland hunter’s alleged mistake leaves Delaware mother dead

Deer Hunter Arrested and Charged with Manslaughter After Fatal Mistake

Man Convicted of Murdering Two Teenage Girls Blames ‘Pagan Ritual’ in New Appeal

Watch for Yourself: Dem Gov. Brags She’s Sending People to Homes of Every New Baby to ‘Make an Assessment’ of the Situation

Trump says Mamdani ‘off to a start,’ has ‘great potential’ in visit to mayor’s mansion

Socialist, communist groups coordinate, promote ‘spontaneous’ anti-ICE protests in Austin

Watch: Dana Bash ‘At a Loss for Words’ Over CNN Ban at WH, But Then Video of CNN Suggesting WH Ban Fox News Surfaces

Vermont man convicted of attempted murder in shooting of three Palestinian students

Fury erupts over Mamdani parade invite as old Columbus insult resurfaces: ‘Are you kidding me?’

House Democrat Endorses Republican Rep. Mike Lawler in Close Midterm Race

Rep Eric Burlison: ‘Most of my colleagues’ are ‘drunk on spending other people’s money, even Republicans’

Austin ICE shooting sparks fight over Venezuelan illegal immigrant’s deportation

See also Barry Melrose, 1956-2026

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020