Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Obama Center takes heat as critics cry foul over ID rules for free entry — while Dems blast voter ID laws

Watch: Hegseth Describes Pilot’s Miraculous Easter Rescue in Terms the Godless Biden Admin Wouldn’t Dare Utter

New poll reveals Spanberger’s popularity is plummeting amid backlash over gerrymandering

Tim Walz-Appointed Judge Throws Out All Charges Against Woman Accused of Interrupting Easter Service

Orban accuses Ukraine of terrorist plot against pipeline amid uphill election battle

Megan Rapinoe Back in the Spotlight – And Getting Torched – For Blasting Rule Protecting Women Athletes

Trump claims he’d win as the president of Venezuela — just needs to ‘quickly’ learn Spanish

Steve Daines’ handpicked Senate successor Kurt Alme vows to keep Montana in Republican hands in 2026

CIA Director Says Iran Was ‘Embarrassed’ and ‘Humiliated’ After American Rescue Mission

Woman gives birth midflight as air traffic controller suggests fitting name for baby

Trump and Hegseth lean hard on religion in post-Easter Iran press conference: ‘God is good’

Murder suspect on ICE hold accused of luring teen into death trap where victim’s final plea went unheard

Congress urged to open antitrust investigation into Apple and OpenAI over ‘left-leaning bias’

Trump Reveals Botched Attempt to Send Guns to the Iranian People: ‘I’m Very Upset’

Angel Dad Calls Out His State’s Dem Senators for Ignoring His Daughter’s Killing by Previously Deported Illegal

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020