Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump-backed incumbent loses primary after super PAC bankrolled by Dems meddled in race

Mamdani repeatedly sidesteps questions on reported plan to revive tax hikes on wealthy New Yorkers

Retired police chief helps subdue passenger after alleged midair outburst over alcohol cutoff

Squad-backed ‘Tennessee Three’ lawmaker wins House primary in newly redrawn district

Conservative firebrand who went viral with anti-CCP ad survives key primary

NYC church arson suspect allegedly plotted more attacks, had violent notes like ‘murder them’ and ‘rape him’

Old Trails Fire suspect allegedly confessed to setting 25 fires; judge doubles bail to $2M

Bodycam shows police K-9 leaping into action after suspected impaired driver refused to surrender

It’s Time to Let States Lead on Paid Family Leave

Primary showdown: Polls close in Tennessee as conservative firebrand eyes governor’s office

EXCLUSIVE: Michigan House speaker calls for answers over $300M taxpayer-funded Rx Kids program

Amazon Investigating After Footage of Delivery Driver Refusing to Take ‘Extra Two Steps’ Goes Viral

Senate scrambles for the exit amid outstanding to-do list: ‘Clear as mud’

It’s True Even if It Makes You Wince: The GOP Establishment Is Right About the Filibuster

Police Officer Arrested for Allegedly Abusing Flock Cameras as Part of Personal Vendetta

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020