Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hasan Piker Doubles Down on America Hate, Says US Bigger Terror Group Than Al-Qaeda

Federal Judge Refers Soros-Funded DA for Criminal Prosecution After Finding ‘Credible Evidence’ He ‘Violated the Law’

WATCH: Gaffe-prone Seattle socialist mayor cuts off police chief in yet another awkward interview

Texas Air National Guard pilot ejects safely before F-16 crash in Michigan

Are Conservatives Actually Represented in the Senate? John Cornyn’s X Page Should Have You Questioning Everything

Starbucks resolves Florida DEI lawsuit with blockbuster nationwide agreement

Buckingham Palace Issues ‘Highly Unusual’ Statement in Response to New Allegations from Princess Diana’s Family

Philadelphia home search uncovers possible human ashes, images of 7 missing women: police

Rand Paul clashes with fellow Republican over AI ‘kill switch’ as Senate grapples with ‘Terminator’ fears

Minnesota’s anti-ICE aid fund becomes latest casualty of state’s embarrassing fraud problem

Air Force Secretary Confirms U.S. Now Has Weapons Deployed in Space

22 Blue States Try to Block Trump Rule That Cracks Down on Immigrants Receiving Welfare in Final Hours Before It Takes Effect

Influential conservative group says all hope is not lost for Republicans during midterms — and here’s why

Powerful teachers’ unions share striking link with states struggling to teach kids to read

Trump’s $5K checks could join stack of past unfulfilled promises, former Congress budget chief warns

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020