Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump-backed Hilton advances to California governor general election

WATCH: As Fraud Accusations Swirl, Nick Shirley Confronts ‘126 Year-Old’ Who Voted in 51 Elections, According to California Sec. of State

Fetterman refuses to defend Platner, calls him ‘baggage’ as scandals mount

ALERT: Trump Launches Strikes After Iran Downed Apache, Fulfilling His Promise to Respond

UFO whistleblower pushes Vance to investigate alleged billions of federal ‘slush funds’ tied to classified programs

Jurors Were Aghast and Karmelo Anthony Wouldn’t Look as Gruesome Image of Austin Metcalf’s Punctured Heart Was Presented at Trial

Tim Walz Gets Referred to DOJ for ‘Full Criminal Investigation’

Stephen A. Smith fires back at Trump over ‘low IQ’ jab: ‘Put my IQ up against yours’

Obama pays tribute to chef who tragically drowned at vacation compound with new honor

DHS directs ICE to deport illegal immigrants who vote in American elections under new directive

Nancy Guthrie sheriff caught with undeclared gun at airport faced no charges, bodycam video shows

WATCH: SPLC chief doubles down on placing Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA on ‘hate map’

Tom Steyer wastes $550 million and ‘everyone’s time’ in failed governor and presidential bids

Florida GOP gubernatorial primary candidate says as governor, he’d ‘shut down’ every abortion clinic in state

Trump’s DOJ pick in trouble as GOP concerns threaten confirmation

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020