Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump rejects shielding Biden records from Senate probes in executive privilege showdown

DHS hammers Dems over airport security lines amid funding lapse

The Most Dishonest Headline We’ve Ever Seen: The NYT’s Headline on the Islamist IED Attack at Mamdani’s Mansion Will Blow Your Mind

Iranian Women’s Soccer Team Appears to Cry for Help with Subtle Hand Gesture

Tankers to resume normal movement in Middle East in ‘a few weeks’ at worst, Energy sec says, ending oil surge

Airport chaos escalates pressure to resolve DHS government shutdown

Warrants served in New Jersey, Pennsylvania as feds look into possible NYC terrorism

How Fairfax County’s sanctuary policies led to an illegal immigrant murdering an innocent woman

A cure for cancer would deliver $185T economic windfall, report says

Minnesota taxpayers on the hook for race-based teacher recruitment

US conducts strike on another boat carrying suspected narco-traffickers, killing 6 people

Pennsylvania state trooper fatally shot during traffic stop, officials say

Before-and-after satellite imagery offers a rare look at damage inside Iran

Police recover third device in ongoing Manhattan IED investigation after two arrests

Police swarm NYC street Sunday amid IED probe near Gracie Mansion

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020