Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

DC murder rate sees astonishing turnaround as Trump team credits federal crackdown

US military kills two suspected narco-terrorists in strike on drug-trafficking vessel in the Pacific

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: UCLA mob mess, veiled threats of violence and a major win over DEI

NFL Legend and Hall of Famer Abruptly Hospitalized, Lawyer and Friend Issues Update

Trump Admin Throws Out Obama-Era Gender Rule in Favor of ‘What the Lord Established from the Beginning’

Florida Dem filed for re-election days before resignation as House Ethics Committee ramped up pressure

Poll Shows Young People Fleeing Major Dem City Due to Cost of Living, Safety, And Jobs

NANNY STATE: UK Slaps Nation’s Youth with Permanent Lifetime Smoking Ban

Grinning suspect cuffed after alleged fiery street takeover, drag race caught on camera

Texas substitute teacher accused of improper relationship with student, alarming parents

DHS blames ‘weak’ Biden border policies after piracy-linked Somali illegal immigrant nabbed at northern border

Incredible Video: Skycam Catches Massive Tornado Narrowly Missing Oklahoma Town During Violent Storm Outbreak

Trump Gives LA Mayor Karen Bass Special Copy of Bible During Oval Office Meeting

Mamdani in the hot seat after first veto derails bipartisan effort to combat antisemitism: ‘Disappointed’

Transgender lawmaker ‘doesn’t know what a woman is,’ White House says after dig at Trump firings

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020