Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Where illegal immigrants find work in the US

Trump kicks off Thanksgiving week with turkey pardon and Christmas tree arrival

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene slaps down notion that she’s eyeing a presidential run

FAA scrambles to hire 8,900 air traffic controllers by 2028 as shortage reaches crisis levels

Top military leaders head to Puerto Rico to thank troops supporting Caribbean missions

Rubio claims ‘tremendous amount of progress’ in Ukraine peace talks following Geneva meeting

Kristi Noem unveils $1B TSA modernization plan, awards $10K bonuses to workers who served during shutdown

Duffy identifies Chicago train victim as 26-year-old Bethany MaGee while blasting city’s ‘carelessness’

DOGE closes eight months early, but principles remain ‘alive and well’

Trump claims GOP has ‘never been so united,’ calls Greene and other Republicans ‘lowlifes’

‘ShamWow’ guy files to run for Congress in Texas as Republican candidate

British teen says urine, glue chucked at him while trying to carry on Charlie Kirk’s legacy in UK

Portion of Catholic students kidnapped in Nigeria escape as country grapples with anti-Christian violence

Southern universities reportedly see massive influx of Northeast students seeking sunshine and Greek life

Scottish Lawmakers Refuse to Ban Shocking ‘Assisted Suicides’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020