Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

U.S. Government Monitors as British Authorities Prosecute Christian Pastor Who Quoted John 3:16

Rat Poison Found in Baby Food Jars Leads to Total Recall

Barricaded suspect faces murder charges after 2 doctoral students vanished from campus, 1 body remains missing

Father recalls horror after son murdered his 5 grandchildren: ‘I knew he killed them’

My Brother’s Teacher Told Him to ‘Draw What Brings You Most Joy’: Since His Answer Was the Cross, It Wasn’t Allowed

Parents in Bronx neighborhood plead for NYPD guard as Mamdani cuts cops, halts hires: ‘Horrible situation’

British Christian Nurse Accused of ‘Misgendering’ a Patient Cleared of Consequences

Radical activist groups circle wagons around Southern Poverty Law Center amid federal charges

US turns to drones after retiring minesweepers to reopen Strait of Hormuz amid Iran crisis

Russia’s Communists channel their ancestors, evoke 1917 in warning to Putin over economy

Michigan governor hopeful pressed on past SPLC work after DOJ indictment: ‘What did Jocelyn know?’

The lawmakers to watch as House tries to pass $70 billion reconciliation bill

DC murder rate sees astonishing turnaround as Trump team credits federal crackdown

US military kills two suspected narco-terrorists in strike on drug-trafficking vessel in the Pacific

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: UCLA mob mess, veiled threats of violence and a major win over DEI

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020