Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

LGBT Mafia Pounces on NFL Star After He Uses ‘Slur’ in Postgame Interview

Stephen Miller Sounds Alarm Over Share of Somalis Using Welfare in Minnesota

Extreme sports star lashes out at Newsom for killing the California dream: ‘What happened?’

ICE arrests criminal illegal immigrant accused of fleeing head-on crash that severely injured Maryland woman

FBI investigating more than 350 subjects tied to violent online ‘764’ network

Chris Cuomo Cannot Remember Recent History, Needs to Be Reminded About Obama Admin’s Illegal Behavior When Berating Conservative

Whistleblower warns massive fraud is happening in Ohio Somali community, Minnesota ‘just tip of the spear’

Miscarriage of Justice: For 2nd Time in One Week a Virginia Grand Jury Has Refused to Indict Letitia James for Mortgage Fraud

Trump asks when he’ll be credited with creating ‘perhaps the Greatest Economy’ ever in US history

Former British PM embraces ‘Trump-style revolution’ while blasting BBC and Bank of England

Opinion: The Trump-Cuellar Disaster Proves Trump Is One of the Most Decent Presidents We’ve Had in Decades

The America Marc Benioff believes in

Trump’s show business homecoming

Noah Baumbach’s paean to fallen stars

Christmas comes early for the Beatles completist

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020