Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dem fundraising giant ActBlue rocked by allegations it misled Congress about foreign donations

US pilot rescued from downed F-15E fighter jet in Iran, search for second crew member ongoing

Don Lemon Teases His Presidential Run Depends on God, Who He Insists is Female: ‘If She Gives Me a Sign’

Feds charge illegal immigrant in Loyola student killing as attorney says prosecutors lack ‘faith’ in state

Breaking: Labor Report Blows Economists Away – 3 Times as Many New Jobs Added as Projected

WATCH: House Democrat gets unexpected response when he asks constituents about voter ID requirements

DHS preps deportation of alleged MS-13 gang member wanted for pastor’s murder in El Salvador

What B-52 bombers bring to the Iran fight and more top headlines

Trump’s $1 billion presidential library expected to dwarf all predecessors

‘Local independent’ outlet in Virginia pushing redistricting is owned by Democratic operatives

VP Vance to meet with Viktor Orbán in Hungary days ahead of foreign nation’s elections

Celebrity chef lashes out at Trump for changing the ‘rules’ the same year as America 250

Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it ‘slap in the face’ to SCOTUS

Artemis II crew describes life aboard Orion spacecraft on historic journey to the moon and back

Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt talk free thinking and faith at TPUSA college tour kickoff

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020