Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Doctor denies knowing about rampant LA-area Medicare fraud using his provider number

California mountain biker dies after month-long hospital stay following rattlesnake bite

Soros-backed DA sparks backlash after blaming Old Dominion shooting on pro-gun lawmakers: ‘F— right off’

Illegal alien’s violent tussle with federal officer leads to multiple charges after suspected Biden-era entry

US Military Plane Lost Amid ‘Operation Epic Fury’: US Central Command

Report: Veteran CBS Reporter Quit After Network Refused to Obsess Over Jan. 6 Anniversary

Retired Air Force Major General with Links to UFO Researcher Goes Missing – Search Underway

Legalize prostitution effort left candidate ‘shocked’ in blue state with rampant human trafficking

WATCH: Democratic Lawmaker Calls ‘Moms for Liberty’ a ‘Terrorist Group’ Then Doubles Down After Being Called Out

Old Dominion University shooter identified as Mohamed Jalloh, former National Guard member, ISIS supporter

FBI held active shooter training at Michigan synagogue weeks before attack

Manchin rips Cornyn for filibuster flip as Texas GOP runoff looms

Schumer swings at Hegseth over king crab meals for the troops, but Biden-era receipts show similar tab

Trump’s evolving stance on Iran ‘unconditional surrender’

Dems vote to keep DHS closed despite airport chaos, Iranian sleeper cell threat

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020