Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

US Agency Releases Startling Report on Anti-Christian Persecution in Major Islamic Country

Inside the US military playbook to cripple Iran if nuclear talks collapse

Spain readies for evacuations as a hantavirus-hit cruise ship heads for the Canary Islands

California abortion pill suppliers plot workarounds ahead of Supreme Court mifepristone decision

Accused street takeover mastermind charged after wild stunts, machine gun chaos: police

Catfish Farmers, Undertakers, Miners Celebrate Major Trump Admin EPA Deregulation

Connecticut pro-Second Amendment group sounds alarm on Glock-style ban, fear Democrats will go even further

California professor accused of killing pro-Israel protester will ‘likely’ avoid lengthy prison sentence

Watch As Democrat Xavier Becerra Calls Migrant Kids Lost Under His Watch MAGA Talking Point

LGBTQ ‘lavender graduations’ set to take place at major Christian colleges, including one with a drag show

Fact Check: No, Kash Patel Is Not Having Custom Bourbon Made on the FBI’s Dime

All gas, no brakes: Wild moments in Trumpworld this week that captured attention

Trump throws his base a UFO bone, but critics say it’s Iran ‘smoke and mirrors’

Two-party politics ‘dead and buried’ in UK after local election bloodbath

Democrats shy away from questions on whether Harris should run for president in 2028

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020