Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Nancy Guthrie video may have been erased after FBI kept out for days, director says

Florida man arrested in IHOP restaurant after police say he stabbed a rideshare driver

Dem ‘Epstein class’ attack backfires as top candidates funded by Epstein-tied billionaire

Muslim Dem Candidate Exposes Flaw in Wokeness Allyship, Now Says She’s Getting Silenced Because She Didn’t Embrace LGBT Agenda

Cuba built covert network inside America through spies, activists and universities, State Dept alleges

Pentagon Releases Video of Latest Strikes on Iran After Trump Orders Revenge for Fallen US Troops

Two House races take center stage as conservative PAC launches multimillion-dollar Big Tech push

Jeff Clark’s yearslong disbarment fight tests reach of DC Bar over Trump DOJ

Trump’s GOP clout faces Arizona test with House majority, governor’s race at stake

DOJ’s creative solution to transgender prison case would move male inmates into specialized unit

DOJ opens probe into Harvard’s financial aid for alleged discrimination against American students

Bodycam catches Sunny Hostin invoking her legal chops as cops cite Harvard-grad son for trespassing

Trump says first call with new UK PM Burnham went ‘very well,’ pledges US support

Lindsey Graham’s Sister Announces She’s Running for Full Senate Term

Rand Paul releases docs that reveal FBI halted border inspection of virus researcher over Wuhan lab links

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020