Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

5 chilling details from the alleged White House attack plot tied to UFC event

Trump wins two, loses one: Georgia billionaire delivers rare blow to endorsement machine

Texas plane crash leaves one dead, more injured after business jet catches fire on highway

GOP Gov DeWine urges Ohio to abolish the death penalty, says it is no longer a deterrent

Dems pick potential successor to DC’s congressional delegate after decades-long incumbency

State of play: What to know about potential socialist showdown between Trump and DC mayor as votes pour in

DC Guard shooting suspect stares down death penalty in first court appearance

Trump’s endorsement fails to save MAGA candidate as billionaire advances in key governor race

FDNY deploys 140+ personnel to JFK after Delta flight reported with flat tires on approach to landing

Look: World Cup Fans Visiting for the First Time Fall in Love with America, Go Viral on Blessings We Take for Granted

Trump-backed ‘McCongressman’ wins Oklahoma Senate primary, vows push for stalled SAVE Act

Trump-backed Kevin Hern wins Oklahoma Senate primary to replace Markwayne Mullin

Watch: Misguided Dems Try to Take Viewers from White House UFC Event, Get Stuck with Bette Midler Giving Worst Performance of Her Life

Chick-fil-A Loses Fast-Food Crown for the First Time in 12 Years

Notorious Trans Actor Says He Has Lost Jaw-Dropping Amount of Income Since Trump Stomped DEI – So Where Was It Coming From?

See also Trump arrives for UFC fight

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020