Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

House Republican plans motion to oust Swalwell from Congress amid sexual assault allegations

DC Put On ‘Spring Teen Jam’ To Keep Juveniles Out Of Trouble — Instead, Eight Got Arrested

America’s Northern Neighbor Going on Gun-Grabbing Spree

Army of Radical Prosecutors All Have One Thing in Common

Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award

Trump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California

Hakeem Jeffries Tells Activist Audience DEI Is Explicitly Written Into Constitution

ICE detains relatives of 1979 Iran hostage crisis figure after Rubio revokes their legal status

Swalwell calls sexual misconduct allegations ‘flat out false,’ says he will fight them ‘with everything’

Photos show Athena Strand kidnapping truck as jurors weigh death penalty for killer FedEx driver

Coast Guard Confiscates Over $33 Million of Cocaine in Major Bust

Swalwell ripped for changing his tune on how sexual assault victims ‘deserve to be heard’

WATCH: Eviction standoff turns war zone as gunman kills deputy in ambush, gets run over by armored vehicle

Top White House officials encouraged potential Bondi replacement to make case to Trump for AG job: Sources

Trump Demands Fox News Take ‘Real Loser’ Host off the Air

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020