Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

HUD launches civil rights investigation into Boston’s DEI housing policies over alleged racial discrimination

Mississippi governor orders release of man who served more than 10 years of illegal 15-year sentence

Invasive pest never before seen in North America threatens Texas food supply, officials warn

Trump grants ‘full pardon’ to Tina Peters after 2020 election interference conviction

Newsom says Trump is one of the ‘most destructive’ president of his lifetime: ‘This guy is reckless’

Black Lives Matter OKC leader charged with wire fraud, money laundering in alleged $3.15M embezzlement scheme

Viral footage shows DoorDash driver allegedly pepper-spraying customer’s food order during delivery

Trump announces pardon for Colorado clerk: ‘Simply wanted to make sure that our elections were fair’

Trump administration offers $5M reward for capture of fugitive Los Choneros gang leader

Minnesota investigation: The shadowy money system Somalis rely on — and terrorists can exploit

New Hampshire 6-year-old tests positive for cocaine, cannabis; mother faces multiple charges

Why 2026 Is Shaping Up to Have the Best Economy Since the Reagan Years

Trump signs executive order limiting state regulation of AI

Wisconsin judge in Trump fake electors case accused of not writing his own ruling

Watch: Leftist Says He ‘Deserves to Be Robbed’ for Being White, Regrets It Seconds Later

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020