Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump turns Obama-era youth health policy on its head as school fitness benchmark returns

Massie ally sparks backlash after accusing Trump-backed challenger of abusing VA benefits

GOP builds huge cash edge as 2026 midterm outlook darkens

At least five killed and dozens injured in Ukraine in ‘vile’ Russian strike amid ceasefire talk

Border Patrol arrests two illegal aliens convicted of child sex offenses near San Diego in back-to-back busts

Trump opens Hormuz under fire with ‘Project Freedom’ as Iran warns of attacks

Arkansas school director sentenced for being ‘ringleader’ of child fight club

Civil rights groups file lawsuit seeking to block Texas law allowing cops to arrest illegal migrants

Rudy Giuliani’s primary care provider gives update on his condition

Police dog follows his nose to find missing autistic teen screaming for help

Ohio daycare worker convicted of horrific physical abuse of toddlers sentenced to years in prison

Alert: Child Struck by Gunfire as Secret Service Neutralizes Alleged Gunman Near White House

Military-trained fugitive accused of shooting wife eludes manhunt in rural woodlands

Staffer for Dem Sen. Cory Booker Who Brought Gun Into Capitol Without a License Saw Charges Quickly Dropped: DOJ

Video shows Dem candidate dodging Trump violence question as campaign issues response

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020