Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Xi can’t escape protesters’ cries at deafening dinner demonstration

College Basketball Coach-Turned ESPN Personality Dies at 47

Watch: Xi Descends Into Laughter as Trump Shows off ‘President Autopen’ Picture in Place of Joe Biden’s Portrait

DOJ announces $25 million ANGEL grant program as it hosts violent crime victims

Unearthed clip exposes clash between El-Sayed and ex-GOP rival: ‘Muslims definitely hate you’

What’s on the menu for Trump’s state dinner with China’s Xi? One American staple is notably missing

Watch: ‘Oh, My God! Why Are We Saying “Free Palestine” Then?’ LGBT Activist Learns Muslims She’s Cheering for Hate Gays

Angel mom says blue state DAs are putting illegal immigrant criminals before public safety

Breaking: Man Wounded During Trump Assassination Attempt in Butler Dies 2 Years Later at 76

Netanyahu fires in all directions at UN, rebuking critics for ‘lies about my country’ as scores of delegates walk out

El Sayed’s Iran and 9/11 problems keep growing

WATCH: Mass walkout before Netanyahu speech prompts fiery response from Israeli prime minister

Iowa teacher, 10-year-old student die during fifth grade school field trip at Lake Macbride State Park

Report: Suspected Site of Noah’s Ark ‘100 Percent Confirmed’ to Be a ‘Manmade Object’

Sophie Cunningham Sends Message to Trans Mob and Her Critics, Telling Them to ‘Kick Rocks’ with Pre-Game Sweatshirt

See also Barry Melrose, 1956-2026

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020