Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fewer Gay Professionals Feel Being Gay Helps Their Career

Trump defends New York Times subpoenas as judge seeks internal DOJ communications

State Officials Blamed Citizens for Death of Bear Stuck Atop Power Pole, but What Bystander Says She Saw Changes Everything

Maine Democrats crown Troy Jackson as Platner replacement as fresh scrutiny clouds Senate reset

Brian Hooker’s stepmom wants to help investigators as she suspects he ‘lied about everything’: reports

Letitia James faces scrutiny after New York City spends $81,700 per homeless person amid shelter scandals

Hawaii’s Democratic lieutenant governor indicted in state corruption investigation

What happened to Michelle Hadley? 5 things to know about ‘A Toxic Love Story’ case

GOP’s freshman firebrand goes viral targeting ‘utterly intellectually indefensible’ DEI policies

Uyghur Pastor in China Faces Forced Church Closure from Communist Officials

Trump revels in his first WHCA dinner speech despite serious tone and tight security

Schools Shutter Across US Opening Door for Seniors to Move in

John Cornyn settles into ‘liberating’ leverage role on his way to retirement

California votes to double down on bad, left-wing policy outcomes

‘Fraudulent, Biased And Misleading’: Trump Rails Against NGO After It Put Out Bezos-Backed Climate Report

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020