Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Wild video shows federal agents detaining 2 men at Minnesota gas station as agitators gather

Deadly avalanche claims 2 snowmobilers in Washington state backcountry, 2 rescued

Trump’s motorcade route adjusted after Secret Service finds ‘suspicious object’ at Palm Beach airport

Jacob Frey tells critics ‘sorry I offended their delicate ears’ after ICE f-bomb controversy

Street takeovers and traffic control by agitators in Minnesota cross legal lines, retired detective says

Suspect arrested after fire burns oldest Mississippi synagogue

US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report shared by Leavitt claims

Critical clue led police to suspect Chicago doctor in deaths of Ohio dentist, wife

LA Residents Still Battling Toxic Hazards in the Aftermath of Last January’s Devastating Wildfires

DHS deploying hundreds more federal agents to Minneapolis, Noem announces

Chinese Communist Party Rounds Up Members of Underground Christian Church in Crackdown

Repeat Offender Charged with Assaulting, Robbing Pregnant Woman While on Blue City’s ‘Electronic Monitoring’

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from enforcing mail-in voting rules in executive order

Obama Presidential Center slammed for promoting ‘far-left’ agenda on public land

Dallas Police Solve 52-Year-Old Missing Person Case, the Oldest in the State of Texas

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020