Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Flock AI Tool Finds You Without a Name or Plate, ‘Can Be Targeted Against Anyone’

Iranians hoard currencies and physical assets as blockade cuts off alternatives to worthless rial

Shark sightings surge along southern Maine coast as experts explain what’s driving the spike

Iceland votes on resuming EU membership talks as Trump’s push for neighboring Greenland looms over debate

North Carolina warns mobile petting zoo visitors of rabies exposure after baby goats test positive

Retired Port Authority officers tell Mamdani, Hochul to stay away from Ground Zero on 9/11

Former California councilman’s corruption unmasked after FBI finds cash buried in backyard

El-Sayed’s Demeaning Usha Vance Comments Set Stage for Major Backfire with Key Demo

Mississippi mayor argues against lowering flag for Dolly Parton after her death

Obama Judge Once Again Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order

Dems face uphill battle in challenge to Georgia Congressional map under new SCOTUS rules

Fauci’s Gov’t Division Worked Hand in Glove with the CIA: Docs

Abdul El-Sayed peppered with questions on Hasan Piker link, fracture with Jewish Dems at Michigan convention

UN Told Merchant Ships Not to Arm Themselves Against Pirates as Piracy Escalates

NYC parolee accused of killing 2 in 48-hour robbery spree hauled in after manhunt, cops say

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020