Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Jasmine Crockett’s social media posts about WHCD shooting show different tones

Mentalist Oz Pearlman to skip Kimmel appearance after Trump dinner shooting

Wisconsin teacher placed on leave after social media post advocating to ‘make Americans great assassins again’

Mamdani and King Charles to attend 9/11 ceremony in New York City: What to know

After Karoline Leavitt Calls Out Dems for Their Vile Anti-Trump Rhetoric, GOP Brings the Receipts

Newsom’s wife lashes out at Trump after he rips ’60 Minutes’ host: ‘Internalized misogyny’

Mamdani’s education plan’s ‘lack of merit’ could fundamentally change student outcomes: GOP leader warns

‘Hell Week’ in Washington: A look at House Republicans’ current bind, and how we got here

DOJ Moves Against White House Ballroom Lawsuit in Wake of Shooting: ‘Enough Is Enough’

Pastor known for marriage advice arrested at rumored swingers community accused of having multiple wives

Newsom taunts Trump with multiple jabs as Florida redistricting fight ramps up: ‘Beat at his own game’

Watch: Bubba Wallace Sparks NASCAR Mega-Crash That Sweeps Up the Majority of the Field

Injured Secret Service agent fired five shots at Cole during Trump assassination attempt

Trump Calls for Jimmy Kimmel to Be ‘Immediately Fired by ABC and Disney’ After ‘Beyond the Pale’ Melania Stunt

Charles goes to Washington: King visits Trump with ‘special relationship’ at a low

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020