Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

LATE BREAKING: Massive Guthrie Kidnapping Break – FBI Now Has Names and Photos of Suspects

Grandmother tells Trump critics to ‘get off the man’s back’ during White House Black History Month event

DHS shutdown leaves local emergency responders on their own amid extreme weather, expert warns

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani reverses course on homeless encampments after pausing clearings

Trump DOJ probes Michigan schools over gender curriculum, joins lawsuit against LA race-based program

3rd arrested in violent overnight home invasion, multiple illegal aliens accused of sexual assault, kidnapping

Family speaks of ‘profound pain’ after trans dad guns down ex-wife, son at high school hockey game

Democrats risk FEMA disaster funding collapse as DHS shutdown hits Day 5

City-run board cancels lease of Israel drone supplier sparking backlash toward Mamdani: ‘Ludicrous’

Nightmare Beach: 8 Severed Human Heads Found on Beach with Disturbing Pamphlets Nearby

Hugh Hefner’s Widow Scrambling to Recover 3,000 of Husband’s Private Photo Albums Possibly Containing Child Pornography

Here Are the Democratic Lawmakers Skipping Trump’s State of the Union to Hold A Rally in DC

CNN, After Bleeding Millions of Viewers, Rolls Out Documentary Targeting Patriotic Christians

Trump orders complete withdrawal of all troops from Syria within two months: report

US-Iran conflict: All sides brace for war as ‘nothing burger’ nuclear negotiations prove fruitless

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020