Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Not Only Is Radical, Senile Maxine Waters Refusing to Retire at 87, She Could Chair Powerful Committee Come Next January

Netflix Hikes Prices for Second Time in Just Over a Year

NASA races to build moon base as US challenges China in new space race

Soros-backed group among liberal orgs pumping eye-popping cash into Virginia gerrymandering effort

Spanish government’s Jimmy Gracey autopsy claims stump forensic expert: ‘problem for me’

Texas Man Lashes Out in Stabbing Attack After Hearing Bible Conversation

Blue State Senator Admits How Democrats Prioritize Illegals in Resurfaced Clip

House GOP rams through new DHS funding plan with shutdown far from over

Facial recognition helped crack alleged student murder by illegal migrant – new bill could ban it: ret. cop

Trump administration locks out Greg Bovino from all social media accounts

Schumer’s prized 2026 recruits won’t commit to keeping him as Senate leader

Spanberger denies ‘deal’ with swing-district Democrat as gerrymandering claims abound statewide

House Republicans pass rival DHS plan, setting up Senate fight as shutdown set to become longest in history

Fulton County makes case for return of 2020 ballots seized by FBI

At least 2 students killed, several injured in school bus crash in Tennessee: ‘A parent’s worst nightmare’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020