Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump nominates Chris Klomp for HHS deputy secretary, calls him ‘a potential STAR’

Muslim Mamdani-backed socialist primary winner suggested America deserved 9/11 in unearthed video

Slotkin says Democratic Party needs ‘new leadership’: ‘Old models are no longer working’

Trump administration pledges $150M in aid, deploys Navy warships after deadly Venezuela earthquakes

Florida executes 74-year-old for wife’s murder, becoming oldest inmate put to death in state’s modern history

A Warning Charlie Kirk Gave Back in 2020 Coming True Now Within Democratic Party

French citizen who illegally cast ballot in 2022 midterms says New Jersey automatically registered him to vote

Jury deadlocks in federal trial of man accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire in Los Angeles

Dems put on blast over poll that shows record-low patriotism in US: ‘Tear our society apart’

Blue state leaders erupt after Supreme Court’s decision ending TPS protections for Haitians, Syrians

Real Man: Churchgoer Can’t Find Tool to Free Kids from Sweltering Car, Says ‘My Fist Will Probably Work,’ Then, With God’s Help, Starts Smashing Glass

Red state gov bans July Fourth fireworks statewide over wildfire concerns ahead of America’s 250th anniversary

Four charged in alleged billion dollar healthcare fraud tied to Russian transnational criminal organization

Hunter Biden, Man Who Isn’t in Prison Thanks to Dem Establishment, Attacks Dem Establishment After Primary Stunners

EXCLUSIVE: DHS asks Florida not to release illegal immigrant accused of drugging, raping woman after clubbing

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020