Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

RNC chair says Talarico’s GOP crossover hopes are a ‘pipe dream’: ‘Nobody is going to follow him’

‘Outsider’ House primary winner sets sights on flipping longtime GOP seat back from Dems: ‘Ready for a change’

Massachusetts Governor Signs New Law Blocking ICE Access to Several Locations

DSA Governor Candidate Hires OnlyFans Model as Deputy Campaign Manager

Tennessee Candidate Arrested After Allegedly Shooting Down Flock Cameras

University of Michigan Goes Full Participation Trophy, Will Hide Grades for Student ‘Mental Health’

Florida man accused of killing nurse mom who helped him despite repeated arrests for threatening her: sheriff

Miss North Carolina USA pageant producers fire back after winner says she lost title over faith

WNBA Commissioner Announces League Is Reviewing Trans Inclusion After Former NBA Players Declare for Draft

Justice Department Settles With Pro-Life Father of 11 Whose Home They Busted Into

IN CHARTS: A visual breakdown of the Smithsonian’s billion-dollar taxpayer-funded budget

Socialists rising in Colorado? Send in the Marines, GOP nominee says

Why Stephen Miller thinks orders limiting birthright citizenship will go differently this time

EXCLUSIVE: Talarico caught on tape giggling about his church housing illegal immigrants set for deportation

Two dead, including infant, after boat capsizes in New York Harbor; 12 rescued

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020