Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Anti-ICE agitators disrupt Minnesota church, shout down worshippers during Sunday service

Retired South Carolina couple found dead in homicides at home

BREAKING: DOJ to Charge Don Lemon Under the ‘KKK Act’ for Inciting Church Raid

Trump warns US can no longer think ‘purely of peace’ as he pushes for Greenland control

Noem hammers Walz, Frey for ignoring 1,360 ICE detainers for criminal illegal aliens

Gut-Punch: Image of Man Comforting Little Boy During Leftist Attack on Christians Should Be Seared Onto Our Brains Forever

Breaking: DOJ Confirms Charges Are Coming for Don Lemon and Anti-ICE Agitators Who Invaded Church

FBI responds to theft of conservative journalist’s camera by activists in Minneapolis

Elon Musk pours a staggering $10M into Kentucky Senate race, backing pro-Trump business outsider

The Lincoln Project continues to enrich leaders as its co-founder wants $100 million more

Alert: Maryland Dems Introduce Bill to Ban All ICE Agents Hired Under Trump from Ever Serving in Law Enforcement Again

The Case for Jailing Don Lemon – How the DOJ Arrested, Tried, Convicted, and Punished Three J6 Journalists

Experts warn Minnesota school closures after ICE shooting will harm kids for ‘political points’

White House-backed GOP bill would revoke citizenship after Somali fraud scandal

Law Professor: Anti-ICE Governors Are Acting Like Anti-Civil Rights Segregationists

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020