Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Watch: James Comer Brings Hard Evidence to House Floor After Hakeem Jeffries Calls Him a ‘Stone-Cold Liar’

Russia and Ukraine worked ‘equally’ with US counterparts on peace deal for a month, Leavitt says

‘Peak Irony’ Riley Gaines Fires Back Against Megan Rapinoe’s Attack on the ‘Save Women’s Sports’ Movement

New York leaders condemn ‘intifada’ chants targeting a synagogue led by a Holocaust survivor

GOP wrestles with Obamacare fix as Trump looms over subsidy fight

Leavitt does damage control after ‘frustrated’ Trump lashes out at reporter and calls for executing Democrats

Fact Check: No, the Comey Prosecutor Did Not Mislead Grand Jurors, Regardless of What the Biden-Appointed Judge Says

ICE deports MS-13 gang leader who tried to ‘game our immigration system’ under Biden administration, DHS says

Even CNN Can’t Believe Jasmine Crockett’s Absurd Excuse for False Epstein Accusation Against Trump Official

Climate deadlines collide with politics as Dem-led states chase Big Oil in court but spare local refiners

Dem lawmaker sets litmus test for party with 5th Trump impeachment effort

Touchdown: Trump’s New Jersey Generals jacket auctioned for $18,658

Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Hating on Miss Israel

Decamillionaires in Congress make taxpayers pay for their lodging and lunches

House members react to indictment of Florida Democrat: ‘Most egregious abuses of public trust’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020