Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fetterman bucks Democrats, says party put politics over country in DHS shutdown standoff

Trump DOJ files new lawsuit accusing Harvard of withholding records on race in admissions

Prominent Ex-Obama Lawyer Signed Epstein Emails with ‘xoxo’ Amid Vulgar Jokes

Watch: US Olympian’s 1st-Place Finish Overturned After Judges Review the Tape

New Jersey teacher who slept with students at family bagel shop learns prison sentence

Democrats push ‘unconstitutional power grab’ that could flip GOP seats and more top headlines

DHS shutdown explained: Who works without pay, what happens to airports and disaster response

Trump’s $12B rare earth plan targets China as experts warn US is ‘one crisis away’

Democrats launch Lunar New Year ad blitz to counter Trump inroads with Asian Americans

Chinese propaganda outlets use Newsom to amplify criticisms of Trump

Walz proposes $10M business relief package as Republicans cry ‘new avenue for fraud’ in Minnesota

Shooting at South Carolina State University leaves two dead

Puerto Rico governor signs law recognizing unborn babies as human beings

Over 700 arrested amid major gang and drug crackdown in Louisiana

Sanctuary policies let alleged child predator roam free until DHS made Portland, Oregon, airport arrest

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020