Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hegseth thinks the solution to his woes is to ‘send himself.’ It’s not

Breaking: Fox News Joins Mainstream Media Networks in White House Boycott

Undercover Video Outs Heresy in Talarico’s Longtime Church: They Hand Out ‘Rewritten’ Bibles That Defy God’s Identity

‘American Idol’ contestant’s 100K texts with mistress show motive in wife’s murder, prosecutors say

Critics pounce as prominent Dem senator seems to make admission about party’s far-left ‘fringe’

Social media erupts over Hasan Piker post targeting Brandon Gill’s wife

Video: After Dozens of US Historical Statues Removed by Left, Indians in TX Have Built Gargantuan 90 Ft. Statue to Pagan ‘God’

Tourists seeking ‘dramatic’ photo on isolated beach trapped by incoming tide

Trump allies building ‘lawfare’ defense apparatus before possible Democratic takeover

Judge Blocks Blue State from Making Nuns Perform Assisted Suicide But It’s Not Over Yet

House GOP not done with ActBlue after bombshell internal memos raise foreign cash questions

GOP takes aim at Congress’ next ‘get filthy rich’ loophole after stock-trading ban

Socialists are helping GOP campaigns heading into November

‘I am guilty’: How Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano keeps letting killers off with insanity pleas

Manhunt underway in California after armed suspect allegedly points gun at people, shoots at officers

See also Barry Melrose, 1956-2026

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020