Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Obama Presidential Center follows widely-mocked ‘stolen land’ acknowledgment with Native American dance show

Manhunt underway for Kansas City shooting spree suspect near World Cup venue; FBI offering $25K reward

US Park Police arrest former Olympian for vandalism of Reflecting Pool

Obama Center embeds ‘Indigenous’ land message on controversial site

Dem who sued to remove Trump’s name from Kennedy Center now says venue becoming ‘lifeless husk’ in fresh fight

Biden scores temporary court victory as Trump-appointed judge delays release of Hur investigation materials

Breaking: Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Threatens End to Peace Talks

Soccer Fan Accuses Israel of Killing Palestinian Team, Pathetically Falls Apart After Learning Palestinians Slaughtered Israeli Team in 1972

Trump blames ABC reporter and vandals for peeling Reflecting Pool and algae growth

Revamped Reflecting Pool Damaged by ‘Radical Left Lunatics,’ Trump Says

Texas Surges Past California in Key Sign of Business Influence

Trump says Meloni ‘wants to be friends again’ after Italy refused to help US amid Iran war

Vance says ‘United States wins either way’ as he defends Trump’s Iran deal against GOP skeptics

Please Clap: Bush Family Member’s Electoral Failure in Maine Is More Evidence RINO Establishment Is Dead

War Department Whittles Down Number of ‘Religions’ It Recognizes

See also Trump arrives for UFC fight

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020