Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

House Dems dodge questions on SCOTUS trans athlete ruling, shift blame to ‘culture wars’

Al Green responds to July 4 question with renewed call to impeach Trump

Trump hails America as ‘most exceptional nation ever to exist’ in Mount Rushmore speech

Trump warns of ‘resurgence of the Communist menace’ during Mount Rushmore America 250 speech

Mamdani Trashes USA on Eve of July 4th as Land of Inequality, Racial Bias

WATCH LIVE: Trump gives Independence Day eve speech at Mount Rushmore

Fourth of July app guides spectators through nine-hour air show from NASA jets to B-1 bombers

Three dead, 7 rescued in boating tragedy as severe holiday weekend storm ravages Wisconsin tourist hot spot

US Coast Guard saves 8, including infant and child, after vessel capsizes off Fort Myers Beach

Military allies, historic tall ships converge on New Jersey shores to launch America 250 celebrations

Watch: Tokyo, Japan, Puts Blue States, Cities to Shame with July 4th Celebration

Trump grants pardons to ‘persecuted’ mechanics in right-to-repair crackdown: ‘I am setting them all free’

Police swarm Michigan shopping center after ‘significant’ shooting incident; at least 2 dead

US military deploys MTVRs, airlifts aid to Venezuela following deadly earthquakes

UPDATE: Strange Findings – DHS Investigators Release Report on Secret Service Failures at Butler Assassination Attempt

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020