Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Tim Tebow Announces He’s ‘Pausing’ Relationship with Christian Group Targeted by Liberal Reporter

Trump Terminates ‘Ridiculous’ Biden-Buttigieg EV Mandate with Sweeping New Fuel Standards

Trump’s Greenland obsession isn’t random. Here’s what’s at stake

Trump reaffirms ICE arrest policy after confusing guidance sparks alarm among agents

Disturbing Video: ‘One of the Most Horrific Things I’ve Seen’ – Journalists Disgusted as Illegal Nearly Drowns Toddler in Effort to Cross Border

Florida sex offender accused of babysitting-ad trap as police investigate potential interstate predator

China Isn’t Waiting for Permits: US Leaders Warn It’s ‘Quicker to Get a College Degree’ Than to Power America

Nonimmigrant visas in flux due to Trump administration fees

Lee Gilley’s Texas attorney ‘never had one like this’ as accused wife killer clings to Italian lifeline

The folksy Senate Republican in hot demand on the campaign trail

SCOTUS detention fight could unleash dangerous criminal migrants onto US streets, experts warns

Michigan man doxxed after exposing his city’s booming Islamic surge takes defiant stand: ‘Not gonna stop’

How Ms. Rachel went from beloved children’s streaming sensation to ‘mouthpiece for Hamas’

Nicki Minaj urges young Americans to ‘vote red’ in 2026 midterms while doubling down on Trump support

Florida man, 76, with suspended license allegedly admits to driving under the influence of rum, cocaine

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020