Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Washington hosts relatively muted Juneteenth compared to America 250 events

Watch: Trump Physically Supports Marine Maj. James Capers, 88, Before Awarding the Unkillable Vietnam Vet the Congressional Medal of Honor

Reporter’s Notebook: How Trump’s surprise move on DNI confirmation upended key Senate deal on FISA

DOJ warns former red state is becoming the next California as governor embraces ICE limits

Trump-Meloni spat grows over claim Italian PM ‘begged’ for photo: ‘astonished’

SEE IT: Dem senator downplays security threat of illegal immigration after White House terror plot

Gilgo Beach serial killer’s ex-wife says he ‘got what he deserved’ after he gets max sentence for 8 murders

Breaking: US Brokers Lebanon Ceasefire After Escalation Derails Peace Talks with Iran

UK’s Prime Minister Directed 13,000 Suspected Pedophiles Get Warning Letters Instead of Prosecution, According to Rape Gang Report

Karmelo Anthony Supporters Find Cruel New Way to Torture Austin Metcalf’s Family, and the Videos Are Disgusting

Republican congressman will end months-long absence from DC after missing 135 roll call votes

WATCH: Tom Hanks Painful Insult to MSNOW Interviewer Goes Viral During Obama Presidential Center Opening

Trump’s 80th Birthday Goes Off Without a Hitch, as UFC Bring Manliness, Spirit of Teddy Roosevelt Back to WH Lawn

Disgraced Murdaugh trial clerk who helped blow up murder conviction claims protection from payback lawsuit

Dem justices slap Soros-backed Philly DA with power strip in stunning decision: ‘Not reliable’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020