Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Five takeaways from opening night of first-ever GOP midterm convention

Trump makes stunning first-of-its-kind cash promise in bid to rally GOP voters at Dallas midterm convention

Trump electrifies his base, but the nosebleeds are empty. Is it enough to win the midterms?

Fetterman teases where his true loyalty lies after surprise appearance at GOP convention

Trump makes convention pitch for Paxton: You may not like his looks, but he’s the best AG in Texas history

US forces obliterate suspected ‘narco-terrorist’ vessel in lethal Eastern Pacific strike, killing 3

Military Base Guards Cleared to Say ‘Have a Blessed Day’ After Pete Hegseth Steps in to Oppose ‘Radical Anti-Christian’ Group

Dem senator delivers surprise video at Republican convention backing McCormick

Jim Jordan to relinquish House Oversight and Judiciary gavels, stirring leadership speculation

HSI agent who investigated child exploitation cases indicted on rape and child abuse charges

Pastor Dies from Injury Suffered While Celebrating Son’s Wedding

Dem incumbent becomes first sitting governor to lose primary since 2018

Chris Rock Rips Into LA, Says Far-Left City Has a Dark ‘Underbelly’ and ‘Wonky Priorities’

DSA Says Smash Capitalism to Free the Animals: Their Socialist Comrades in Venezuela Ate Dogs, Cats, and Pigeons

Internet Demands Probe After Mitch McConnell’s Wife Reportedly Revealed to Have CCP Ties

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020