Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Breaking: ICE Shooting Rocks Austin – Protesters Clash with Officers, Democrats Condemn Agency with Few Facts Available

ICE shooting rocks Austin as Democrat demands bodycam video, independent probe

Massachusetts’ plan to offer postpartum screening home visits sparks online debate

Cops flush homecoming prank plans after seizing 650 toilet paper rolls in ‘Operation Clean Sweep’

Trump to meet with Mamdani in New York amid high-stakes midterm push

White House reporter talks about Trump banning MS Now, Politico, and CNN

It’s Not All Doom and Gloom: AI Added 1 Million US Jobs, 5 for Every 1 Cut

Politicians Forgot Backup Power When They Pushed Clean Power in 13 States: Now Electric Bills Are Skyrocketing

True Crime-Obsessed Crazies Are Making the Clancy Holdout Juror Family’s Life a Living Hell

Why Trump zeroed in on Greenland, the world’s largest island, mostly covered in ice — in 3 charts

Data Analysis Proves Radical Communists Aren’t the Fringe: Majority of Dems Are DSA

Burglar Breaks Glass, Alerts Armed Alabama Homeowner – It’s Last Mistake He Ever Made

Trump says new arch will also deploy drones, position snipers and store ammo

You Could See Drones Buzzing All Over the Country: Trump Admin Expands Drone Operations

‘I’m Not Kidding’: FBI Agent Wanted to Charge Elon Musk for Asking Federal Workers What They Did That Week

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020