Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Rogue Dem bucks party on Trump war powers, calls Iran ‘47-year-old war crime’

Vulnerable Dem incumbent caught calling home state ‘stolen land’ in resurfaced video

Disney Set to Make Significant Layoffs as Fierce Competition Takes a Toll: Report

Despite Some GOP Claims, the ‘DIGNITY Act’ Is an Amnesty Bill and We’ve Got the Receipts to Prove It

Oklahoma principal shot in leg is praised for tackling school shooter: ‘He is a hero’

Philadelphia parking garage collapse leaves 1 dead, 2 missing

DC’s bid to block Trump’s National Guard deployment hits basic legal snag: Can’t sue itself

Spanberger ripped after taking credit for billions in investments secured under GOP predecessor: ‘Pathetic’

He’s Out! Disgraced Lawyer Michael Avenatti Moves to Hollywood Halfway House to Finish Prison Sentence

Five ways Mullin is already pushing DHS in a new direction

Trump blasts CNN and New York Times for reporting on a ‘fake ten point plan’

Michigan woman arrested for allegedly starving, torturing disabled sister-in-law she locked in basement

South Carolina pastor, wife arrested after alleged sexual, physical abuse of foster children

Dem lawmaker calls for TSA to bring back shoes-off airport security policy

Former Fort Bragg employee charged with leaking classified military information to journalist

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020