Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hormuz choke point persists as Iran halts oil traffic despite Trump ceasefire

DoorDash data offers snapshot of economy voters are feeling ahead of midterms

Putin issues a decree calling for a ceasefire in fighting for Orthodox Easter holiday

Artemis II nears end of historic mission with splashdown off California coast

Trump blasts Biden admin for releasing illegal immigrant now charged in fatal hammer attack on Florida mother

Iran peace talks give JD Vance an opening in 2028 race

Mahmoud Khalil loses appeal to dismiss deportation case

Coast Guard seizes over 4,500 pounds of cocaine worth $34M from suspected narco-terrorist vessel on Easter

ICE says more criminal migrants arrested on 1-year anniversary of program to support victims of migrant crime

Supreme Court blocks candidate after alleged GOP infiltration scheme exposed

Child among 4 dead as accused arsonist allegedly drank beer during chaos

Neighbor fatally shoots alleged gunman after 2 women shot in domestic dispute

Melania Trump’s forceful Epstein denial draws bipartisan support from lawmakers

Fellow Democrats Are Now Calling Out Eric Swalwell Over ‘Very Troubling’ Accusations

Michael Moore Defends Iran, Slams US for Bombing Japan in WWII in Deranged Rant: ‘We’re the Bad Guys!’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020