Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Clinton Contempt Vote Set for Next Week: Will Justice Be Served?

Epstein Helped Fund Lavish Lifestyle for Former Obama WH Counsel Who Gave Him Legal Advice

From Obama award to Minnesota op: Why Trump tapped Tom Homan for on-the-ground crackdown

House GOP majority on the brink as all-Democrat Texas special congressional election underway

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison Set to Testify Before Congress About Massive Fraud Allegations

Conservative group blasts LinkedIn for removing pro-ICE post, labeling it ‘hateful’

Famed filmmaker presses Democrats to put ‘citizen-led’ presidential primary first

He’s Not Joking: Jim Acosta Claims Don Lemon Was Arrested Because He’s Black

LAPD arrests violent agitators after protests erupt outside federal detention center in Los Angeles

Government shuts down again after Democrats revolt over DHS funding

Left-wing activists storming synagogue use knee pads, adult diaper to mock Dem congressman over ICE vote

ICE lodges detainer for illegal immigrant accused of sexually assaulting teen

US approves massive arms sales to Israel and Saudi Arabia for more than $15 billion amid Middle East tensions

Letitia James fires attorney consumer fraud over criticism of pediatric ‘gender care’

Saudis won’t let the US use its bases or airspace for an attack on Iran, senior Gulf official reveals

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020