Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dems Fight for Fraud with the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’

Beshear sends second letter to Mitch McConnell demanding ‘proof of your capacity to serve, or resign’

DCCC program knocks nearly 40,000 doors to mark 100 days from midterms

Op-Ed: Don’t Follow the Left into Fratricide Over Israel

Trump welcomes Netanyahu to White House as raging Iran war threatens to sour US-Israel relationship

Christian Teacher Released from Prison After 700 Days for Refusing to Use Preferred Pronouns

Major CEO Predicts Another $100 Billion Is Heading Toward Trump Accounts

WATCH: E-bike teen takeover swarms downtown city streets blocking traffic, leading to charges

Savannah Guthrie’s emotional plea to mom’s kidnapper may signal ‘new line of communication’: report

Fauci privately took credit for COVID-19 lockdowns despite public denial, newly exposed diary entries reveal

Lindsey Graham’s final mission nears finish line as world leaders gather to honor him

Democrats target more GOP House seats after socialist victories rock left-wing primaries

Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband details ‘big spiral’ as expert says one part ‘scared me’ in mom’s murder trial

Heroic 16-year-old lifeguard rescues child from monster surf in heart-stopping video

California family members claim they were attacked at luxury Maui resort during violent melee

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020