Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump Floats Plan to ‘Reverse Birthright Citizenship’ in Spite of the Supreme Court

NPR Retracts Bombshell Story About Supreme Court Justice Retiring

Shock poll: Talarico ties Paxton in Texas Senate race, threatening GOP stronghold

GOP infighting over Trump’s voter ID bill erupts as top senator calls strategy ‘fantasy’

CA Neighbors Furious as Alleged Anti-Trump HOA Gets Ultimate Revenge in Lead Up to July 4

Priceless Video: ICE Guards Have to Protect Rioters from Female Employee Raging After They Hit Her Car

Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce reported MSG wedding plans call for 1,000 guests, street closure at MSG: source

Heartbroken father blasts ‘broken’ system that let family massacre take his children before they could reunite

MS Now’s Longest-Running Anchor Is Out As Struggling Network Pivots to More Reliance on Podcasts

House GOP’s SAVE Act rescue plan hits resistance from conservative holdouts

Trump’s massive GOP faith bloc raises red flag on Iran deal: Trust him, not his team

Socialists take fight west, target Colorado in latest bid to oust Democratic Party establishment

Fetterman unleashes on ‘dirtbag’ wing of Dems after far-left victories: ‘Orgy of socialism’

Trump supporters rip Amy Coney Barrett after Supreme Court setbacks

A California dog rescue hid a grim secret: more than 100 dogs buried beneath it

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020