Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Proposal would pay homeowners ‘data center dividends’ to counter growing backlash

Fmr Biden ambassador blames Trump for Canada playing ‘footsie’ with China

Accused wife killer Barry Morphew back behind bars after separate incident that skyrocketed bond: prosecutors

Amazon cargo jet pilot reportedly told wife, ‘My career is over’ shortly after deadly crash

Watch: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Accidentally Admit They Made Their Decision Based on the Wrong Criteria

Art Garfunkel Says He’s Contemplating Leaving America Because of Trump

Oil hits $100 per barrel after US hit Iranian tankers near Strait of Hormuz

EXCLUSIVE — Newsom’s hard truth for Democrats: ‘It’s our performance’

Trump hails ‘really big night’ for populists in German election after historic victory

Supreme Court chief justice praises outgoing Smithsonian leader who was under pressure from Trump admin

Who were the key figures in the Bush administration on 9/11, and where are they now

George Bush welcomes top officials to his home state for 9/11 remembrance on 25th anniversary of attacks

Socialist politicians are ‘more racist than the KKK,’ says Black Dem official urging voters to ditch El-Sayed

Appeals court upholds order blocking IRS from sharing taxpayer data with ICE

Senator’s daughter wins Democratic nod in closely watched race to replace outgoing Dem incumbent

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020