Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Veteran pediatrician hails Medicaid shift ending youth sex-change treatments: ‘This is not denial of care’

Legal expert calls for Smithsonian leadership overhaul over ‘self-loathing’ portrayal of history: ‘It’s bile’

Man charged with assault, hate crimes after allegedly disrupting Shabbat services at NYC synagogue

Shake Shack worker allegedly calls out before robbing own restaurant, returns in uniform 2 days later

California Man Receives Postcard Sent by His Late Parents 26 Years Ago

DFW Airport scraps controversial Islamic foot-washing station plan as Texas Gov Abbott takes aim

California teen faces prison after viral video shows him squaring up, repeatedly kicking sea lion in the face

Delta flight diverted twice after lavatory leak floods cabin, leaves passengers stranded for hours

Reagan National Airport makes drastic change following deadly 2025 midair collision

Watch: Little League Coach Declares, ‘Jesus Is Still Lord’ Live on ESPN

El-Sayed’s half sister offered Oct 7 ‘blessing,’ one year after Hamas attack: ‘Allahu Akbar’

Trump leaves stage mid-speech to embrace parents of 12-year-old killed by stray bullet in the Bronx

Trump’s fight over rarely used 18th-century deportation law lives on in latest court clash

President Trump claims AOC, far-left Democrats are backing away from controversial positions

EXCLUSIVE: Kennedy Center board moves to name grounds ‘President Donald J Trump Plaza’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020