Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Democrats who ‘never voted Republican’ back Rogers over El-Sayed in razor-close race

Angel Dad takes major new role after daughter’s killing sparks sweeping illegal alien crackdown

Police identify suspect accused of terrorizing Philadelphia women while wearing creepy Chucky-style mask

Philadelphia woman says she used stage combat training to fight off masked man chasing residents

Key Democratic Senate Candidate’s Campaign Descends Into ‘Complete Chaos’

FBI raids Eric Swalwell’s property, seizes devices at airport in sexual misconduct investigation

Sherrill escalates Trump fight over voter fiasco day after Mullin praises NJ cooperation

ActBlue co-founder pleads Fifth Amendment in closed-door House GOP grilling

Ocasio-Cortez endorses Massachusetts Senate incumbent Ed Markey

USS George Washington arrives in Middle East

Presumed Lead Candidate to Replace Karoline Leavitt Says She’s ‘Not in the Running’

U.S. Conducting Successful ‘Stealth Operation’ in the Strait of Hormuz: Report

Harry and Meghan Abandoning US, Returning to Britain as Eye-Watering Monthly Cost of Their CA Mansion Is Revealed

Bloodied, ejected Marine Corps pilot seen calm and collected after Washington crash destroys aircraft

New judge has days to decide whether Karmelo Anthony’s conviction and 35-year sentence survive

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020