Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Biden ghostwriter tapes released after former president forfeits legal battle

Biden’s classified docs narrative crumbles amid release of ghostwriter tapes: ‘Be careful’

Trump Calls on John Thune to Hold Senators in D.C. Until They Terminate the Filibuster

Senate advances nomination of Jay Clayton to lead intel community

Georgia teenager pleads guilty to charging Capitol grounds with shotgun

Netflix Executive Takes Legal Action After Being Fired for Workplace Retreat Confession

Senate clears way for Trump’s top spy as key anti-terror program remains in limbo

In Just One Diocese, 7 Catholic Churches Are Canceling Sunday Mass Entirely as Minnesota’s Self-Destruction Continues

Op-Ed: Sparing Our Children from a Nuclear Iran

Luigi Mangione plea talks raise showdown over Brian Thompson murder trial

9/11 families push to ban Mamdani from 25th anniversary remembrance over ‘hostile’ record

Thune pours cold water Trump’s call to axe August recess for SAVE America Act

Illegal immigrant accused of murdering college student dials into hearing from hospital bed

Trans influencer breaks silence after Trump’s comparison to CNN anchor at WHCA Dinner

Police Searching for Second Suspect After Deadly Shooting at Seattle Festival

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020