Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dystopia: UK Woman Recalls Being Arrested by Multiple Officers for Hate Crime While She Was Naked, After Sending Harmless Text Message

Decomposed body found in Connecticut after standoff with man who opened fire at police

Adams issues orders blocking NYC from boycotting Israel as clash with Mamdani grows

US Institute of Peace officially renamed for Trump as White House moves to dismantle agency: ‘Congratulations’

Feds arrest felon illegal immigrant after seizing tens of millions in meth stashed in blackberries

Elderly Texas woman learns fate for distributing 150,000 doses of fentanyl through the mail

Model, DJ linked to violent Tren de Aragua gang leader sanctioned by Trump administration

Social media reactions reveal why both parties celebrated after GOP candidate won special election

Prince William Plans to ‘Slash and Burn’ Royal Establishment, Harry and Meghan: Report

Ghislaine Maxwell pushes back on full transparency for Epstein files

Trump warns US may launch land operations inside Venezuela ‘very soon,’ says regime sent ‘killers’ to America

Ex-CNN Anchor Who Quit News Industry Under Cloud of Controversy Is Now Dead

Americans want US to lead globally but doubt military can win major wars overseas, survey finds

The Tennessee ‘waltz’: Republicans and Democrats dance around meaning of special election results

Family Demands Answers After Texas A&M Student Mysteriously Dies After Football Tailgate

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020