Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Florida GOP gubernatorial primary candidate says as governor, he’d ‘shut down’ every abortion clinic in state

Trump’s DOJ pick in trouble as GOP concerns threaten confirmation

Trump Provides Update After US Army Helicopter Goes Down Near Strait of Hormuz

Charlotte train stabbing suspect dodges potential death penalty for now after he’s ruled incompetent

VIDEOS: Mamdani’s Knicks Party Descends Into Violence, Pandemonium With Cops Forced to Use Pepper Spray to Restore Order

Bombshell claims by former campaign director rock Platner’s campaign hours before polls open

Watch: NY Knicks Fans Desecrate National Anthem to Spite Trump

Utah prosecutors ask judge to shut down delay tactics in Charlie Kirk assassination case

Four Armed Teens Try To Carjack Marine Vet: It Doesn’t End Well for Them

Trump’s SAVE America Act shows signs of life in the Senate despite Republican revolt

EPA And Private Business Helps LA Wildfire Survivors Where City Won’t

GOP grows antsy over Trump intel pick as Democrats vow spy powers revolt

75-Year-Old Nabbed at Border With Half a Million in Hard Narcotics

US Army helicopter goes down, but President Donald Trump says ‘pilots are fine’

GOP lawmaker warns voters that Platner’s ‘extreme’ policies just as concerning as his baggage: ‘Stay away’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020