Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dem Mayor Offers Support to ‘Trans Period’ Event Featuring Free Undies

Dem Gov Gets Rare Conservative Credit, Then Blows It With Embarrassing Victim Routine

NYC landlord pleads for help as ‘9-year-squatter’ continues to drain him dry in court saga: ‘Twilight Zone’

One southern city you’ve never heard of is growing faster than anywhere else in America

Ex-Iowa school superintendent sentenced to prison as an illegal alien found with firearms

Elderly couple fatally stabbed inside Queens apartment, no arrests made as investigation continues: report

ICE arrests illegal alien who allegedly faked asylum claim based on homosexuality, became Indiana jail officer

Hasan Piker says UK has barred him, trashes ‘unbelievable…power’ of pro-Israel groups

Pratt rallies supporters as Los Angeles mayoral race enters final stretch

Left-wing streamer blasts New Jersey governor over state police response at ICE facility protests

Man who warned coworkers ‘no one’s going home today’ gets prison term in fatal shooting

Scott Peterson’s longtime lawyer claims ‘new’ evidence could force courts to revisit his murder conviction

Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened

Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms

NYPD commissioner ‘proudly’ leads Israel parade as grand marshal; Mamdani breaks tradition, avoids event

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020