Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

‘Botched’ lethal injection earns Tennessee death row inmate reprieve

College students accused of turning popular beach town into booze-soaked free-for-all in takeover chaos

Single Chart Shows DNC’s Downfall Among the American Electorate Since 2009

Man arrested for allegedly hurling beer keg through window of famous Georgetown Cupcake bakery

Sanders caught on camera snapping at reporter over Platner’s posts: ‘Get a better job’

Former Detroit mayor blows governor’s race wide open in surprise move

Trump Admin Moves to Supercharge Deportations with Unprecedented Immigration Judge Addition

Arts commission approves plans for Trump’s triumphal arch

NASCAR Star Kyle Busch Hospitalized with ‘Severe’ Medical Issue

Senate Republicans Deal a Serious Blow to Trump’s White House Ballroom Project

RNC legal victory clears North Carolina voter roll purge of noncitiznes through jury responses

Rep. Jim Jordan asks whether Southern Poverty Law Center paid Jan. 6 confidential sources

‘Seattle can’t survive this’: Critics hammer socialist mayor after Starbucks reversal

Zohran Mamdani announces $50 World Cup tickets for New Yorkers

Wall Street banks helped Chinese military-linked firm raise billions despite red flags, lawmakers find

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020