Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fauci’s lawyers launch legal defense fund as federal, state investigations mount against him

Texas Gov Abbott asks the Justice Department to investigate ‘discriminatory’ Islamic washing stations

DOJ says Rubio should have final say over Foreign Service board in latest bid to tighten executive powers

Trump Announces Deal to ‘Substantially Lower the Price of Ground Beef’

Chinese Man Charged with Illegally Voting in US Election and Trying to Frame Someone Else

US threatens Belgian university over suspension of academic who exposed Jason Arday fraud

Two US Army Corps of Engineers employees among 8 killed in Alaska charter plane crash

WATCH: Deputies hunt wanted man through cornfield after high-speed chase caught on camera

Black voters rip Dems over taking them for granted in El-Sayed’s backyard: ‘Hush us up’

Trump-appointed judge blocks blue state’s crackdown on ICE detention center

Breaking: Supreme Court Sides with Trump on White House Ball Room Construction

NY Knicks Owner Turns Against Kathy Hochul, Gives Big to Republican Opponent

ICC president decries being sanctioned by US: ‘Demise of international rule of law’

Appeals court upholds Letitia James subpoena block as DOJ vows to appeal to Supreme Court

Trump to transform spaceflight from spectacle to status quo targeting 3 launches per day

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020