Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dem gubernatorial candidate racked up eye-popping travel bill as AG during 400+ days traveling out of state

Trump floats dragging Congress back during spring recess to end shutdown — but one hurdle stands in the way

Wild bodycam video shows cops storm chaotic teen ‘takeover’ as businesses trashed: ‘They come to fight’

NFL Star Comes to Defense of NBA Player Who Was Cut for Biblical Comments: ‘The World Calls Us Crazy’

On July 1, A Florida Airport Will Officially Become Donald J. Trump Int’l Airport and Get Corresponding New Airport Code

Missing paddleboarder found dead in Old Tampa Bay after a weekend disappearance near the causeway

Dem lawmaker sparks online firestorm after saying Iryna Zarutska mural doesn’t align with city’s values

Former San Francisco Human Rights Commission leader accused of ‘self-dealing,’ public corruption

Ground Stops Ordered for DC-Area Airports

Vance: White House Plans to ‘Go After’ Ilhan Omar for Alleged Immigration Fraud

NYC Dem, Hochul aide under investigation over alleged migrant shelter bribes

Democrats pounce on $4 a gallon gas, blame Trump’s Iran war for ‘broken promise’

Woman Tries Getting Birth Certificate, SS Card, and Marriage License to See if Dems Are Honest – Says She Caught Them Lying Through Their Teeth

Trump Seethes After France Blocks American Military Planes: ‘The USA Will Remember’

Hegseth reveals covert visit to troops fighting in Operation Epic Fury

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020