Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

36-Year-Old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Attempts to Control Time by Freezing Her Eggs

Potential Contamination from Mexico Triggers Salsa Recall from Walmart, Target, Kroger

Fauci discussed COVID mRNA vaccine concerns for pregnant women in text chain released by Senate committee

Board of Peace undeterred by Israel’s rejection of peace plan at this stage

Trump announces aide will soon step into White House counsel post

FBI investigated then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions one day after Comey’s firing, declassified documents show

Op-Ed: Make Families Self-Sufficient Again

WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Remains the Man to Beat as Thomas Massie Gains Ground

Socialist leader squirms during TV interview when forced to address push to abolish prisons, police

Spencer Pratt praises fierce GOP foe in rare bipartisan turn: ‘Major props’

Missing American woman in Grenada may have drowned after swimming far offshore, husband says

A Southern state just took the top spot in one of the world’s fastest-growing industries

Dem rep, in first video since hit-and-run crash, opens up about wreck

Great-grandson of slaves has warning about Smithsonian’s anti-American ‘indoctrination’ and more top headlines

Kentucky middle school teacher accused of crossing the line with student, arrested under new anti-grooming law

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020