Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

White House considers plan to build permanent fencing around Lafayette Park

Man arrested on suspicion of murdering British politician Ann Widdecombe

Erika Kirk urges judge to clear path quickly for Tyler Robinson murder trial

Biden Immigrant Trucker from Muslim Country Reportedly Rammed, Killed College Soccer Goalie – Had to Use Translation App to Talk with Cops

Trump Tells Reporter Iran Will Pay Dearly if He is Assassinated: ‘I’ve Left Instructions’

Intel expert says Singham network is more than a nonprofit scandal—it’s a security threat

Cause of death revealed for American mother murdered in Ireland: report

NJ husband begs for CPR help in 911 call after wife found dead with stab wounds: audio

New Trump UFO file dump includes military footage of mysterious star-shaped object

Graphic: Another Muslim Activist Freaks Out, Demanding We Confine Our Dogs According to the Will of Allah

Video Emerges Showing Mitch McConnell Taken to Hospital After Cardiac Arrest – Report

Peter Navarro seeks ‘precedent for years to come’ with renewed contempt fight

Trump administration expands ‘Product of USA’ label as push for American-raised beef grows

Mamdani official’s planned meeting with Iran envoy shut down by State Department

Iran will target Israel if US continues strikes after ceasefire collapses, official warns

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020