Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Closed-door outburst turns into victory for Trump’s Iran negotiations

‘America is back’: Trump kicks off Great American State Fair with flyovers, patriotic National Mall speech

Trump administration says federal authorities have arrested more than 10,000 suspected gang members

Body believed to be Kansas City highway shooting suspect found in burned home’s basement by family: police

Pennsylvania mother’s video captures armed intruder holding her toddler as she begs for child’s release

‘High casualties’ feared after two powerful earthquakes rock Venezuela: USGS

Sean Hannity Issues Explanation After Viewers Express Concern About His On-Air Appearance

DHS puts ‘sanctuary politicians’ on notice after alleged park predator was released under Biden

Tempers Flare and Voices Are Raised as Trump and Senate Republican Go Toe-to-Toe in Closed Door Meeting

Christian Judge Who Refused to Perform Gay Weddings ‘Vindicated’ in Big Court Ruling

ALERT: 2 Major Earthquakes Within Minutes of Each on Different Parts of Globe – Injury Situations Unclear – VIDEO

New York congressional primary becomes second most expensive House race ever amid AI fight

Dem Rep Floats Unhinged Conspiracy Theory About Trump Using ‘Special New Drug’ to Combat ‘Terminal Illness’

Watch: Democratic Rep. Physically Lashes Out at Questioner Asking About Graham Platner

Unearthed video exposes vulnerable House Dem’s reversal on crucial issue impacting state

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020