Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Watch: Stephen A. Smith Gushes About ‘Positively Brilliant’ Trump Who Keeps Foiling Democrats at Every Turn

Breaking: Trump Wins FIFA Peace Prize, Calls it ‘One of the Great Honors of My Life’

SCOTUS to review Trump executive order on birthright citizenship

Judge on the clock as NY AG Letitia James challenges US attorney’s authority to investigate her lawsuits

Vance acknowledges voters ‘impatient’ on affordability, rejects ‘totally bulls— narrative’

Jan 6 defendant pardoned by Trump lands in legal trouble again

Watch: Stephen A. Smith Locks Horns With Whoopi as He Schools the Women of ‘The View’ on Why Democrats Are Losing

Nearly Half of LGBT TV Characters to Vanish Next Year as Show Cancellations Pile Up

911 call for Luigi Mangione’s arrest in McDonald’s released: ‘He looks like the CEO shooter’

ICE operation in Minneapolis nabs a dozen ‘worst of the worst’ criminal illegal aliens, including Somalis

Trump national security blueprint declares ‘era of mass migration is over,’ targets China’s rise

Priceless Video: CNN’s Jake Tapper Calls Jan 6 Pipe Bomb Suspect ‘White Man’ on Live TV – Does He Look White to You?

The Plot Thickens: DC Pipe Bomb Suspect’s George Floyd Connection Has Been Uncovered

Mandela Barnes jumps into Wisconsin governor race — but baggage from his 2022 Senate bid follows

Trump administration balances US support for Saudi Arabia and Israel

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020