Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Top GOP group pumps $37M into fight on key issue dominating midterm races: ‘Much more to come’

Talarico says the divide is ‘top vs. bottom’ — then heads to one of America’s richest donor enclaves

Texas woman faked pregnancy for months before killing friend, abducting her unborn baby

South Carolina fitness trainer told friends she wanted to leave her now-husband years before body was found

Rubio gives Iran deal the silent treatment

How Brendan Carr’s attack on TV stations echoes FCC chairman under JFK

The wish to be like Wolfgang: Review of ‘Amadeus’

Minnesota AG Ellison lashes out when grilled on fraud scandal: ‘I’m done talking to you’

WATCH: Tuberville backs Trump’s Iran deal as Democrat blasts ‘surrender’

Israel ‘remains firmly committed’ to ceasefire but will continue occupation of southern Lebanon

News Outlet Caves to Democratic Senate Candidate, Kills Poll That Makes Her Look Bad

Watch: Angel Reese Shoves Caitlin Clark, Then Mocks Her as Long-Running Rivalry Is Renewed

Karmelo Anthony runs away after murdering Austin Metcalf: surveillance video

Michigan trio allegedly beat, strangled and gagged man at Las Vegas hotel to collect on gambling debts

Body found in South Carolina ID’d as missing fitness trainer who told friend she was ‘scared for her life’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020