Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump ordered to pay $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll as judge rejects request to delay payout

DOJ records reveal possible classified security lapses inside Jack Smith’s office during Trump prosecution

Authorities searching for K2 cargo plane crew that disappeared near Pakistan

Bombshell: Platner Girlfriend Says He Would Secretly Remove Condoms During Sex When She Wasn’t on Birth Control

On Same Day as Platner Bombshell, Another Dem Sex Scandal Explodes – Candidate Allegedly Shoved Hand Down Victim’s Trousers, Fondled Him, and Worse

Top Dem admits Trump ‘wisely’ made critical demand to NATO allies: ‘Love and hate relationship’

Leftist California group pushes to add ‘Black English’ to schools’ multilingual education program

Officers in Maryland respond to reported assault, discover guns and unusual group of animals

Watch: US Conducts Massive Strikes, Hits 80 Targets After Iran Attacks Ships in Strait, This as Trump Says Ceasefire Is Dead

DOJ Puts Election Officials in All 50 States on Notice: Prevent Noncitizen Voting or Else

Erika Kirk comforts a stranger in tears during hearing for husband’s accused assassin Tyler Robinson

Shipping through Strait of Hormuz declared dangerous with Iran ceasefire in jeopardy

Platner campaign putting ‘thumb on scale’ to influence possible replacement, Maine Dem alleges

Uncertain status of McConnell could create legal firestorm over possible replacement

Former acting DHS secretary warns Chinese criminal organizations are infiltrating America’s hemp industry

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020