Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

US Navy Sailor Admits to Killing Fellow Sailor in Barracks

Sen Tom Cotton urges DOJ to probe Chinese bid to ‘kneecap’ American AI

Bill Gates faces House investigators over Jeffrey Epstein ties

Ron DeSantis Calls Out Fellow Republicans for an AI Blunder That Left the Door Wide Open for Democrats

Judicial turf war ignites over DOJ investigations into transgender drugs and surgeries for children

Top takeaways from the primary elections in Maine and South Carolina: ‘Movement about us’

Judge blocks Alabama’s nitrogen gas execution method, rules it is unconstitutionally cruel

Trump-endorsed candidate will face top GOP target in Nevada House district

Gaming-world veteran who ripped ‘woke’ culture scores Trump-backed battleground primary win

Top GOP target Dina Titus fends off House primary challengers

BREAKING: Karmelo Anthony Prison Sentence Announced, Roughly 4 Hours After Guilty Verdict Read

Trump administration to offer ‘premium’ expedited visa interviews for $750

Billionare Tom Steyer ends California governor campaign after falling short in Jungle Primary

Nick Reiner, Charged with Murdering His Parents, Demands Access to $1.5 Million Inheritance

GOP Finally Defeat Democrats, Pass Bill to Fund ICE, Border Patrol for Years to Come

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020