Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

‘He should go’: Senate Dems turned on Swalwell ahead of resignation announcement

Thom Tillis slams Trump’s proposal to impose tolls on ships in Strait of Hormuz

Florida doctor charged after allegedly removing wrong organ during surgery

Ukraine has no ‘unrealistic expectations’ for Hungary as it pitches itself as ally to Magyar

Spanberger’s ‘unconstitutional’ push to redefine presidential elections makes voters ‘NULL AND VOID’: critics

Eric Swalwell scandal hangs over ‘best friend’ Ruben Gallego’s 2028 hopes

Watch: Pelosi and Fellow Dems Scramble to Defend Themselves from Fallout of Swalwell’s Implosion

Breaking: Woman Steps Forward with Darkest Accusations Yet Against Swalwell

Illegal immigrant driver charged with DUI after car veers off road, kills two children on bikes: police

House Dems unveil bill to examine removing Trump using 25th Amendment

Socialist Mamdani touts government-run grocery plan as ‘grand experiment’’ at grocery new site

Blasphemous California Tech Company Offers Paid Video Calls with AI ‘Jesus’ Avatar

San Francisco Put in Subway Turnstiles That Can’t Be Jumped – Maintenance Dropped 96 Percent

Appeals court shuts down Boasberg contempt inquiry into Trump administration over El Salvador deportations

Kash Patel taunts Swalwell with FBI sit-down as resignation fallout grows

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020