Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

AIPAC cuts funding to Democrats who voted to end Israel aid

Op-Ed: The Weight of a Word

Time enough at last: What’s next after the House passes bill to do away with Daylight Saving Time?

Democrats turn on congressional hopeful after ‘hiding’ LGBTQ+ views from Muslim voters

WATCH: Inside look at the dangerous cartel human smuggling tunnels still being used at border

Paul Pelosi charged with misdemeanor hit-and-run in Napa Valley

House Republicans Call for Investigation Into Mamdani Administration’s Possible Violation of Federal Law

Trump Admin Deploys New Military Equipment to Israel with Eye Toward Major Escalation in Iran: Report

Teen brawl inside In-N-Out sends customers running during monsoon storm, video shows

US backs Iraq-Syria oil pipeline bypassing Strait of Hormuz

Over 100 Democrats voted to end aid to Israel. They’ve received nearly $11 million from AIPAC

WATCH: Felony suspect’s ocean getaway unravels after 90-minute standoff with lifeguards

Covert DNA sample from Colorado man’s trash revives 44-year-old Texas murder case: report

Don Lemon Claims People Are Begging Him to Run for President and He’s ‘Totally Serious’ About Doing It

Olive Garden’s Never-Ending Pasta Regulation Becomes Unlikely Election Integrity Rallying Point for Conservatives

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020