Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fierce Trump critic Jasmine Crockett shakes up high-stakes Senate race

Congress to Withhold Key Funding from Pentagon Until Pete Hegseth Meets Lawmakers’ Demands

Report: Biden Was So Determined to Do the Opposite of Trump That He Ignored Repeated Warnings from His Own Advisers

White House turns up heat on Biden’s economic record as voters sour on ‘affordability’

Former Miss Slovakia says Uber driver kicked her out on busy intersection for being Jewish

Luigi Mangione pumps fist in court as body cam allegedly reveals loaded magazine found inside wet underwear

Top Dem Drops Out of Texas Senate Race on Same Day Jasmine Crockett Is Expected to Announce Her Candidacy

Op-Ed: Shocking Teenage Abortion Investigation Shows Weakness of Red-State Abortion Laws

Trump to unleash $12B farm rescue as China trade reset hits US growers

Trump HHS changes transgender Biden official’s nameplate back to birth name during shutdown

Megyn Kelly Confirms Deadly COVID Vax Reporting – Read the Bombshell ’10 Out of 96 Reported Child Deaths Were Vax-Related’ Memo Here

Picture Perfect Troll: Trump Adds His Birthday to List of Dates for Free Nat’l Park Admission and Cuts MLK Day, Juneteenth

SCOTUS takes up Trump’s bid to fire FTC commissioner at will — a showdown that could topple 90-year precedent

US deports more Iranians, Islamic republic says

DC police chief resigns amid Trump pressure and crime data manipulation probe

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020