Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Illegal alien ‘monster’ charged with raping dead girlfriend’s daughter, DHS blames Biden-era policies

Disturbing new details revealed in death of Denver airport intruder who died after breaching fence

Schumer backs GOP’s plan to bring the pain during future shutdowns: ‘I’m going to vote for it’

Mayorkas doesn’t endorse fellow Biden official Becerra in California gubernatorial race

Breaking: Marty Makary Is Out as FDA Commissioner – Acting Replacement Named

Indiana’s Cignetti Gifts Trump Custom Hoosiers Jersey as NCAA Champs Visit WH: ‘I Like This Guy’

Military vet sees opening for GOP in blue state amid ‘embarrassment’ of ‘stolen valor Walz’

Democrats Attempt to Bully House Republican Into Resigning Over ‘Racism’ Against Hakeem Jeffries

Career Criminal Opens Fire on Police Officers While Out on Parole for the Same Crime

Judge in Tiger Woods hearing allows access to drug records

Warsh confirmed as Fed governor, with vote on chairmanship to follow

Once doomed, Trump’s pick to carry out his economic vision clears first crucial hurdle

Court hears arguments on Missouri’s new map as Democrats try to claw back GOP redistricting gains

Virginia GOP leader blasts ‘power-hungry’ Jeffries as Dems mount ‘insane’ gambit to overpower high court

Mother’s Day dinner dispute turns violent as man accused of stabbing grandmother 11 times: police

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020