Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Socialist-backed Michigan Senate hopeful calls American politics a ‘disease’ after professing love for US

Anti-ICE walkout exposes how school district ‘failed’ parents, risked student safety: ‘Broken my trust’

RNC trolls DNC, Maine Democratic Party in letter offering to help restore trust, ‘defend democracy’

Nurses and teachers unions bankroll leftist candidates and causes

2 Colombian nationals arrested in stolen Mercedes linked to violent California carjacking

NORAD F-16s intercept multiple aircraft violating temporary flight restrictions over New Jersey

Platner ally Troy Jackson locks down delegates as top rivals for Democratic Senate nomination drop out

Young airman killed in heavy equipment accident at California Space Force base

Mass shooting rocks crowded downtown Tucson district, leaving 10 wounded

JD Vance and wife Usha welcome fourth child, reveal baby boy’s name

AOC accused of putting on new accent during Memphis rally: ‘Going full Kamala’

Tipster charged with murder after police say anonymous call helped solve 30-year disappearance

‘Let’s brew it in the United States’: Teamsters target Modelo and Corona in push for Mexican beer tariffs

Six dead as Kyiv hit by largest ballistic missile attack of war with interceptor stock low

Jarring Video: South African Reveals What’s Actually Believed About Whites, And It Is Horrific

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020