Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Israel ‘remains firmly committed’ to ceasefire but will continue occupation of southern Lebanon

News Outlet Caves to Democratic Senate Candidate, Kills Poll That Makes Her Look Bad

Watch: Angel Reese Shoves Caitlin Clark, Then Mocks Her as Long-Running Rivalry Is Renewed

Karmelo Anthony runs away after murdering Austin Metcalf: surveillance video

Michigan trio allegedly beat, strangled and gagged man at Las Vegas hotel to collect on gambling debts

Obama Snubs Trump from Presidential Center Opening, Then Subtly Attacks Him

Double endorsement drama: Trump backs second candidate in red state’s GOP gubernatorial runoff

Schiff silent on Biden-era Newsom probe report as California AG claims DOJ ‘weaponization’

Trump reveals new Air Force One will fly over DC on July 4

Transgender former New Hampshire state representative sentenced to 33 years for child sex abuse: report

WATCH: Boozy boaters unleash wild riverfront brawl as fists fly at popular South Carolina sandbar

New Air Force One takes flight as Trump unveils revamped presidential aircraft

Clarence Thomas and Two Fellow Conservatives Form Unexpected Majority with Two Liberals in SCOTUS Decision

‘Political stunt’ prosecution of ICE agent for ‘road rage’ provokes heated DHS response

Satanic: Muslim Pedophiles Told UK Girls That Being Raped Would Take Away Their Sins

See also Trump arrives for UFC fight

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020