Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Wyoming Supreme Court rules laws restricting abortion violate state constitution

Trump admin expands visa bond requirement to 38 countries, with fees up to $15K

Video shows masked thieves using sledgehammer in brazen Lululemon heist before fleeing in U-Haul

Vance reposts sombrero meme mocking Democrats’ Jan 6 candlelight vigil

‘The People’s Qur’an’: Mamdani announces NYC Quran exhibit with book belonging to revolutionary activist

Biden, Who Donated Less Than 1 Percent of His Income to Charity at Times, Is Getting the Single Most ‘Extravagant’ Presidential Pension in History

Pardoned Jan. 6 participants demand ‘retribution’ in first commemorative march on Capitol

Jasmine Crockett Has Vulgar Response to SCOTUS After She Lost District in Texas

Trump announces Venezuela turning over millions of barrels of oil to US government ‘immediately’

Massive luxury handbag heist caught on camera as heavily armed police swarm California store

Alert: Michael Reagan, Son of President Ronald Reagan, Has Died

Maduro hires Reagan-era DOJ attorney in narco-terrorism case

US gains leverage over Canadian oil, weakens China amid US plans to overhaul Venezuelan oil market

Tim Walz Panicking as DHS Begins ‘Largest Immigration Operation Ever’ in Minnesota

Abrego Garcia says government can’t re-arrest him despite recent deportation order

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020