Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Platner aide hit with brutal timeline check after campaign denied rape claim, then folded days later

EXCLUSIVE: Former ‘Apprentice’ star picked by Trump to showcase America’s 250th anniversary through art

The RNC wants a massive Trump celebration. Some worry ordinary Republicans can’t afford to attend

BREAKING: GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham Dead at 71

Sen. Lindsey Graham dead at 71 after ‘brief and sudden’ illness, office says

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Alleged K-12 fraud, one school’s battle with Newsom and a win in Florida

‘Die Hard’ actor Robert Davi blasts Mamdani after NYC map omits Little Italy

Dem governor escalates McConnell health demands, cites response to past Trump health concerns

Another US citizen tests positive for Ebola virus while working in Congo amid record outbreak

Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez to stump for Abdul el Sayed in Michigan Senate primary

Army Black Hawks airlift 200-plus stranded campers as Missouri floods trigger more 350 rescues

Renowned Feminist Historian Loses Professorship as Experts Tear Apart Her So-Called Historical Findings

NYPD officer charged with rape, child sex crimes previously admitted to misconduct on the job, records show

Trump Signals Daylight Savings Time May Soon Become Permanent, Praises Bill

Teen Athlete Goes Viral After Revealing She Was Sexually Harassed by Trans Athlete in Locker Room

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020