Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

New Polling Puts Trump in Landslide Lead When It Comes to the Economy, Defying Democrats’ Biggest Mid-Term Narrative

Missing Virginia coach Travis Turner fuels tense school board meeting as judge seals case records: report

Trump tells Mexico to fix cross-border sewage problem flowing into US communities ‘IMMEDIATELY’

It Appears Jasmine Crockett Just Fell for a Trap Set by the Republican Senatorial Committee

Florida man allegedly crashes stolen BMW, gives bizarre explanation to deputies: ‘I teleported’

‘He had years to stop this’: GOP lawmakers blast Walz over massive Minnesota fraud scheme

The most googled people in US for 2025

Judge Boasberg seeks testimony from DOJ ‘whistleblower’ in criminal contempt inquiry

Late Breaking Video: Trump Announces Jerome Powell May Not Actually Be Fed Chair Since He Was Appointed Via Biden’s Autopen

US Chamber of Commerce accused of leading ‘woke corporate America’ as Trump dismantles DEI agenda

Alert: Cause of Death of Mitt Romney’s Sister-in-Law Revealed – Now We Likely Know Exactly Why It Happened, Too

Congressional Democrats widen 2026 battlefield, zero in on new House Republican targets

Charlie Kirk’s New Book Rockets to Top of Bestseller List on Day 1 – Publisher Scrambles to Print More Copies

Deep Dive: No, the Jews Do Not Teach Jesus Is Being Boiled in Filth as a Punishment

Minnesota college administrator accused of impeding ICE arrest to protect student sexual predator

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020