Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

AOC doubles down on call for Trump’s ouster even after ceasefire announcement

Inside Antifa-linked group’s plan to ‘structurally change’ the US as May Day unrest approaches

Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed’s unapologetic embrace of Hasan Piker

Terror suspects indicted after allegedly throwing bombs at NYC protest outside mayor’s mansion

A-10 Warthog given new maritime role targeting boats in Iran after efforts to retire aircraft

Breaking: Oil Plummets After Trump Announces Iran Ceasefire

Abortion pill mifepristone stays available by mail for now as FDA faces 6-month review deadline

Pope Leo calls out Trump’s Iran rhetoric before last-minute ceasefire emerges

Liberals tighten grip on battleground state Supreme Court in low-key but high-stakes election

American couple chasing retirement dream in Bahamas boating mystery were ‘inexperienced’: Friend

Swalwell campaign rejects ‘outrageous’ allegations of sexual misconduct as Dem activists issue viral warning

Watch: The Country Would ‘Come Unglued’ – Tim Burchett Reveals Alien Life Briefing He Attended 2 Weeks Ago

Texas man tackled by church security after bringing loaded gun, ammo to Houston service

ESPN Set to Begin Layoffs Due to ‘Unexpected Revenue Dip’: Report

Trump-backed Republican pads GOP’s fragile House majority by winning showdown for MTG’s former seat

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020