Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump-Backed Rep. Andy Ogles Loses Primary After Green Energy Group Spent Big to Unseat Him

Violent Criminal Who Was Set Free on Plea Deal Arrested After Horrific Attacks on Random Women

‘No place like Mackinac’: Mike Rogers trolls Abdul el Sayed after hot mic moment emerges

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Duke Law’s alleged race-based admissions accused of defying Supreme Court

Missing Illinois kayakers found dead near strait called Death’s Door known for shipwrecks

Unearthed clip of El-Sayed revealing his ‘hate’ for iconic Michigan town sparks online firestorm: ‘Dark heart’

Duke Law’s alleged race-based admissions accused of defying Supreme Court ruling: DOJ

US Army offering defense firms ‘concierge access’ to test weapons at military ranges

Blanche Appears Poised for AG Confirmation as GOP Senator Announces Support

French right-wing media figure attacked by mob of antifa militants

10 Democrats and Rand Paul oppose Russia sanctions bill

Democrats Furious as Trump Signs Two Executive Orders to End Birth Tourism

Maryland’s lone congressional Republican blasts Moore’s redistricting push as alleged 2028 White House play

Fraternal Order of Police slams vulnerable House Democrat for using logo in constituent mail

Detroit-area couple accused of throwing explosive device with alarming 2-word message into neighbor’s yard

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020