Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump oversees US strikes on Iran from Mar-a-Lago, speaks with Netanyahu: WH

Trump Urges Iranian People to Rise Up Against Their Regime Following Strikes: ‘Take Over Your Government’

CNN Staffers ‘Panicked’ and ‘Freaking Out’ Over Trump Ally’s Son Buying Parent Company: He’ll Clean House

Iran fires missiles at US bases across Middle East after American strikes on nuclear, IRGC sites

VA Woman Allegedly Stabbed to Death by Illegal with 30+ Arrests Just Before VA Gov Demonized ICE in SOTU Response

BREAKING: Trump Announces ‘Major Combat Operations’ Against Iran: ‘A Vicious Group of Very Hard, Terrible People’

‘America’s Most Wanted’ co-host Callahan Walsh reveals what ‘sticks out’ to him in Nancy Guthrie case

Fetterman praises Operation Epic Fury: Trump is ‘willing to do what’s right’

Trump tells Iranians the ‘hour of your freedom is at hand’ as US-Israel launch strikes against Iran

Cassidy’s crossroads: Trump nominee presents latest challenge for GOP senator

Trump and Vance turn over ‘new leaf’ with Zelensky one year since Oval Office clash

GOING BROKE? The Washington Post Is Bleeding Money, With Losses Exceeding $100 Million in 2025

Poll: America’s Support for Israel Plunges as More Independents and Democrats Sympathize with Palestinians

China’s all-out campaign against Japan includes AI warfare, blacklists, and WWII grievances

US and Israel launch ‘preemptive’ attack against Iran

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020