Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Judge and wife shot in broad daylight in Indiana, sparking massive multi-agency investigation

Dem Senator Warner admits Biden ‘screwed up’ the border, but claims ICE now targeting noncriminals

Trump says media focuses too much on Minnesota ICE coverage, not enough on corruption allegations

Maryland Democrat’s bill seeks to ‘digitally unmask’ ICE agents after fatal Minneapolis shooting

Bill Cassidy challenger digs in against Trump’s preferred GOP Senate candidate

Florida repeat offender allegedly killed 3 tourists minutes from Magic Kingdom after run of violence: records

ISIS fighters reportedly escape from Kurdish prisons amid fighting with government

Piers Morgan Hospitalized After Suffering Serious Injury at Restaurant

UN chief accuses US of ditching international law as Trump blasts global bodies

Oops: Leader of Anti-ICE Church Invasion Just Made Prosecutors’ Job a Lot Easier

Bruce Springsteen Pauses Concert to Deliver Vulgar Anti-ICE Message

Watch: US National Anthem Heckled at London NBA Game

Prominent Catholic bishop slams anti-ICE agitators who disrupted MN church service: ‘Unacceptable’

Anti-ICE Rioters Assault Conservative, Force Man to Take Off His American Flag Hoodie

Mexico using ‘weaponized immigration’ to undermine US sovereignty, author of new book alleges

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020