Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Iran Releases Sick Video Showing Terrorists How to Target Melania, Suggests Neuro Toxin Strategy, Then Takes Aim at Barron

The Electoral College Must Be Protected: Here’s Why

‘Tip of the iceberg’: NJ illegal voting scandal explodes with more key systems at risk

Coercion Is the Abortion Debate We Aren’t Having

Scientists who nominated Fauci for prize money received millions in NIAID funding

DOJ can’t release Biden tapes while hiding Jack Smith report, watchdog says

No Jews on Mamdani’s ‘truly representative’ NYC judiciary panel, sparking backlash

Should taxpayer dollars pay for veterans’ service dogs? Congress is deciding

Kentucky governor calls on McConnell to prove he is fit to serve or resign: ‘Address the people’

Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband details pill use as expert says evidence could shape murder trial

BTK killer Dennis Rader’s daughter Kerri Rawson hit with domestic violence injunction: report

Murdered 9-year-old begged not to go on trip with dad months before he allegedly killed her, mom testifies

Thune soft-pedals adding Trump’s request for debt limit curveball to GOP budget bill

Breaking: Iran Launches Missiles at US Base in Surprise Attack – US Forces Downed Every Single One

New Maine law limits police cooperation with federal immigration officials

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020