Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Mamdani breaks with Adams, vows NYC will stop clearing homeless encampments in January

Mamdani says NYPD commissioner apologized after her brother called him ‘enemy’ of the Jewish people at gala

Harvard professor detained by ICE after Boston synagogue shooting, agrees to voluntarily leave US

Democrats’ anger at federal government hit record high just days before shutdown: Pew poll

DHS arrests dozens of illegal immigrants within 24 hours of launching New Orleans operation

Breaking: DC Pipe Bomb Suspect’s Family Has History of Working to Free Illegals from ICE, Sued the Trump Admin, And Used Trayvon Martin’s Lawyer to Fight So-Called Racism

Washington DC lights the National Christmas Tree

Ex–New York State official accused of spying for China called Hochul ‘more obedient’ than Cuomo, trial reveals

US carries out 22nd strike on alleged drug vessel operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization

‘I Didn’t Stutter’: Stephen A. Smith and Sunny Hostin Clash on ‘The View’ Over Video Urging Troops to Ignore Trump

Absolute Tragedy: U.S. Marine Dies After Horrific Camp Pendleton Accident

Suspected thieves caught on camera smashing Washington state storefront with truck in ATM heist attempt

Blue State’s Dems Steamroll Redistricting Change That All But Erases Its GOP from Congress

Grand jury declines to indict Letitia James after earlier case collapsed

FBI says Jan. 6 pipe bomb suspect purchased bomb parts in 2019

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020