Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

The Swamp’s Got Another Bright Idea, and It Could End Up Hosing Every American Who Drives

SCOTUS Showdown Over Gun Suppressors Looms After Appeals Court Creates ‘Circuit Split’

WATCH: Biden appears confused about where to exit stage after Democratic gala remarks

It’s Happening: CA Revival Extends for Weeks, ‘Greatest Nights’ in Over 50 Years of Evangelist’s Crusades

Parents Sue Snapchat Alleging Its Responsibility For 12-Year-Old’s Rape

Young Americans break sharply from older Americans on China threat, new poll finds

SNAP food stamp fraud has nefarious terrorism links, top Agriculture watchdog warns Congress

Frustrated blue-collar union bosses rip socialist politicians, warn of labor exodus from Dem party

Polygamous sect leader convicted on state charges after girls found in unventilated trailer

Englishman Visits America For World Cup, Meets Trump: ‘I Now Understand The American Dream’

Mackenzie Shirilla’s appeal rejected by court after ‘The Crash’ revives ‘Hell on Wheels’ case

Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter

Ukraine’s drone campaign against Russia’s energy infrastructure takes a toll, but falls short of a game changer

Congress is struggling to get its work done and a new report argues for 21st-century upgrades

Nigel Farage squirms in spotlight as British press hounds him over £5M ‘gift’ from crypto billionaire

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020