Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Senator John Kennedy introduces America to ‘Margaret,’ his elliptical trainer named after Thatcher

Waymo driverless cars overrun Atlanta neighborhood, circling cul-de-sacs and alarming families with kids

Lithuania and Poland forecast ‘military aid’ to help open Strait of Hormuz amid denials of US troop reductions in region

From Revival to Reformation: Why I’m Running for Governor of California

Here’s Where the Redistricting Wars Stand as the 2026 Midterms Approach

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Detransitioner drama, sex toy giveaways, shocking bathroom find

Colorado governor commutes Tina Peters’ sentence as Trump posts ‘FREE TINA!’

Supreme Court deals blow to Virginia Democrats in fight over state court ruling

Navy veteran Rocky Rochford seeks to turn Tampa Bay red, unseat 20-year House incumbent

Trump Reveals Waterfront Site for Long-Planned National Garden of American Heroes

Alex Murdaugh retrial could bring potential death penalty as AG says ‘all our legal options are on the table’

Op-Ed: Tulsi Gabbard, the CIA, And the MKUltra Files – What Are They Hiding?

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Nancy Guthrie sheriff, Alex Murdaugh’s win, Kouri Richins’ message

Outrage: Using Enormous Pipes Water Utility Didn’t Know About, AI Data Center Guzzled 30 Million Gallons of Water for Free

Texas Boom: GOP-Led State Brags America’s 5 Fastest-Growing Cities as People Flee Blue States

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020