Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

You Could See Drones Buzzing All Over the Country: Trump Admin Expands Drone Operations

‘I’m Not Kidding’: FBI Agent Wanted to Charge Elon Musk for Asking Federal Workers What They Did That Week

Police officer, woman shot near Notre Dame after football tailgates

El-Sayed’s Senate bid raises new concerns over a powerful privilege that comes with the job

Trump says Triumphal Arch will be converted into ‘top-grade’ military complex

ICE-led Florida operation nets 500 — including illegal aliens accused of murder, child abuse, cartel ties

Several Were Illegal Aliens: DOJ Announces 16 Culprits Caught Illegally Voting in Federal Elections

WATCH: Exclusive look at blue-collar workforce fueling America’s AI boom

DSA Chapter Leader Resigns, Warns ‘Frightening’ and ‘Extreme’ Radicals Are Running the Show

WATCH: AI safety scare sparks Cap Hill fight over guardrails: ‘China’s going to eat our lunch’

‘Not a slam dunk’: Trump’s 2028 mail-vote push hinges on one big legal question

El Sayed-aligned Islamic council with alleged terrorism financing ties issued fatwa to financially support Muslim candidates

Trey Gowdy talks about his new novel and what he’s up to next

US military strikes alleged narco-trafficking vessel in Caribbean, killing 4 ‘narco-terrorists’

Justice Department charges 16 across multiple states with alleged illegal voting, election crimes

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020