Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Militant Antifa Leftist Indicted for Allegedly Trying to Torch GOP Headquarters

A Better Way for Christians to Engage Politics and Culture

Dem senators deflect questions on Platner’s scandal-plagued campaign: ‘Not following that race closely’

Trump champions bid to nix clock changes by adopting permanent daylight saving time

GOP caps turbulent week, pointing finger at White House for immigration bill blunder

Army cuts helicopters, pushes ‘Amazon for war’ as drone combat reshapes military

Massive SPLC-linked grant under fire as watchdog exposes ties to middle school programs

DOJ bolsters South Florida team investigating alleged anti-Trump conspiracy

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Alex Murdaugh’s new defense, Luigi Mangione’s decision, Tyler Robinson’s fight

Rep. Tom Kean Jr. says he expects to return to Congress ‘in the next couple of weeks’ after missing 100 votes

Teen suspect tied to 12 attacks in chaotic Austin shooting spree identified as illegal alien

More than 300 arrested in sprawling California crackdown on child exploitation crimes

Former US attorney charged with felony hit-and-run after Houston crash, police say

Plan for Trump’s ‘Triumphal Arch’ Clears Another Important Hurdle with DC Commission Approval

Texas congressional candidate claims she never called for ‘internment camps’ after party leaders condemn her

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020