Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Watch: Trump’s NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya Unloads on Fauci Over Texts Showing He Thought One Thing, But Said Another to American Mothers

Zuckerberg Superyacht Accused of Ignoring Vessel’s Call for Help – Alaskan Cruise Captain Comes to the Rescue

Trump directs CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz to end Medicaid gender transition funding for minors

Suspect in off-duty Philadelphia officer’s car theft linked to killing of Penn State student: police

DOJ won’t rule out new charges for Reflecting Pool vandals as Trump calls to revisit dropped cases

Vulnerable Dem’s campaign pitch clashes with ‘radical’ voting record on top culture war issue

Man wanted in robbery tied to Penn State student’s murder now sought after off-duty cop shootout

Democrats give Senate GOP new midterm ammo in opposing federal voter ID

Syria’s death sentence for Assad puts new strain on revamped relationship with Russia

Watch: Another Talarico Clip Comes Back to Bite Him as He Characterizes Christians as ‘Causing Trouble’

Socialist Wisconsin governor candidate referred to America as ‘abundance of suffering,’ resurfaced post shows

HHS bureaucrats accused of ‘sabotaging’ RFK Jr’s efforts to expose Fauci records

Russia Releases American Military Veteran Who Was Taken Prisoner During Biden Administration

Replacement GOP nominee named after Rep Chuck Edwards drops re-election bid

US Marine veteran released from Russian prison after 1,666 days of detention

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020