Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

War Secretary Pete Hegseth spends Thanksgiving with US troops in Latin America: ‘We are grateful for you’

National Guard member Sarah Beckstrom dead after DC shooting: ‘Highly respected’

Erika Kirk shares emotional Thanksgiving message honoring Charlie: ‘What remains is sacred’

Trump says US will begin stopping Venezuelan drug traffickers by land: ‘Going to start very soon’

Breaking: Trump Announces Female National Guardsmen Has Died Following DC Shooting

Shedeur Sanders responds to Trump’s support after first win: ‘I TOLD YOU SO’

Flashback: Newsom’s 2020 Thanksgiving Rules Should Remind Us What True Authoritarianism Looks Like

DNC chair ‘never wants to hear again’ that Democrats have ‘problem with young men’

DHS moves to cut off South Texas Catholic Charities over migrant grant ‘misconduct,’ documents say

‘Jack Will Be the Architect’: Trump Teams with Jack Nicklaus to Revamp ‘Presidential Golf Course’

Thanksgiving recipes from America’s first families — presidential dishes to try at home

Pope Leo XIV speaks in Turkey ahead of ecumenical meeting with Orthodox patriarch

Military reveals just how much turkey shipped globally to ensure American troops enjoy Thanksgiving meal

Navy Sailor Makes Ultimate Sacrifice Saving Children from Dangerous Hawaiian Surf

Ex-FBI special agent explains Afghan vetting failures in wake of National Guard ambush: ‘Ticking time bomb’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020