Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Elite Ivy League campus latest to grapple with mass shooting as violence erupts at Brown University

FBI ousts reinstated whistleblower over unauthorized media talks, ‘poor judgment’

Breaking: Shooting at Brown University, 2 Dead

Op-Ed: The Friendly Housekeepers’ Fraud

Op-Ed: Political Division Is So Severe America Should Split in Two

Trump takes the field at Army-Navy game for coin toss, military flyover

Fact Check: No, Catholic Missionaries Didn’t Put 200 Canadian Natives in Mass Graves Near a School – the Entire Slaughter Was a Fraud from the Start

At least 2 dead, 8 in critical condition after mass shooting at Brown University; manhunt underway for suspect

Trump vows ‘very serious retaliation’ against ISIS after deadly Syria ambush kills US soldiers

Maduro trapped with few retaliation options after Trump admin seizes Venezuelan oil tanker

Israel kills top Hamas commander hours after terrorists attacked Israeli soldiers

Despite Legendary Season From Ohtani, Time Goes With Woke Pick for ‘Athlete of the Year’

Man uncovers missing father’s bones buried beneath family home, unleashing ‘a thousand’ other secrets

Elon Musk blasts Newsom’s office, says his son is battling mental illness due to ‘evil woke mind virus’

It Worked: Dems Line Up Behind Moronic Firebrand Republicans Picked For Swing Senate Seat

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020