Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump Says Ceasefire Has Been ‘Violated Numerous Times’ as Iran Threatens to Deploy ‘New Cards on the Battlefield’

‘Traitor’ Dem senator ripped after one-word reaction appears to cheer on Iran

Alert: 26 Christians Kidnapped in 8 Days by Muslims Fulani Terrorists in Nigeria

Hiker identified, popular trail closed after deadly fall at Utah’s Zion National Park

Byron Donalds cracks down on persistent border blind spot leaving US vulnerable to overstays

DOJ Reveals How Biden Weaponized the Government Against Anti-Abortion Activists

Suspect allegedly guns down deputy in ambush during routine call that rocked quiet town, police say

Trump Names New Acting Labor Secretary as Chavez-DeRemer Resigns

Ex-Trump ally MTG slams both sides of the political aisle: ‘Nothing ever changes’

Dem hopeful who co-founded Joe Rogan’s favorite jeans under fire for ‘Made in America’ claim

What to watch as Virginia voters decide high-stakes redistricting referendum

Trump pleads with Virginians to ‘just vote no’ on redistricting measure in telerally call

Another Democrat exits California’s crowded gubernatorial race weeks before the June 2 primary election

Chinese national arrested at JFK after allegedly photographing US military aircraft at Nebraska base

Louisiana Mass Murderer Who Killed 8 Children Previously Got Probation for Firing Gun Toward a School: Report

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020