Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump Triumphs at SCOTUS – Dems Counting on Mail-in Voting Should Prepare to Panic

Dem House hopeful defended music video showing woman restrained, groped and killed

Jeffries brags about Dem obstruction against Trump as he defends Kushner meeting

ICE Chief: Agents Being Stalked and Harassed in Los Angeles – LAPD Bound by ‘Sanctuary Policies’ Doing Nothing

9/11 victim’s identity emerges nearly 25 years later after DNA breakthrough cracks mystery

Federal judge slaps down Ghislaine Maxwell petition for new trial as ‘rambling,’ ‘meritless’

Ohio man charged over graphic threats to kill Trump, behead GOP lawmaker

‘Send help’: LA GOP leader issues desperate appeal after Dem mayor’s campaign vid shocks viewers

El-Sayed Finally Scrambles to Distance Himself from Hasan Piker After Piker Openly Threatens Violence Against American Jews

CNN Loses Signal for Half an Hour, Network Blames Tech Issues

Smithsonian-linked museum in El-Sayed’s backyard puts America’s post-9/11 response on trial

Blue state’s water failures could threaten food supplies across US, lawmaker warns

Man Who Threatened to Shoot Thomas Massie Receives Over 2 Years in Prison

Anti-abortion activists worry New Jersey abortion clinic law chills protected speech

Lindsay Clancy trial: Postpartum is real, but child killing demands accountability, veteran prosecutor says

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020