Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

ICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers

Woman Jailed After Gruesome Discovery Made in Light Bulb Box Buried in Back Yard

Pure Evil: Court Docs Claim Virginia Dem. Official Tried Getting Sexual Access to 9-Year-Old Boy… and then the Comments About Toddlers Started

One Agency Tried to Stop the Somali Welfare Fraud as Early as 2020, but Activists Used DEI to Intimidate It Into Silence

After Ayatollah Strikes Back at Trump and Says He’ll Fall From ‘The Peak of His Hubris,’ X Users Add Epic Community Note

Crowd-for-hire boss rejects Minneapolis unrest as illegal chaos

US military launches airstrikes against ISIS targets in Syria, officials say

State Department declares ‘international bureaucracies’ will no longer get ‘blank checks’ from the US

Four tankers that left Venezuela in ‘dark mode’ return as US eyes the country’s oil

Luxury Car Company Recalls Hundreds of Thousands of Cars Over Rearview Camera Defect

Trump signs order to protect Venezuela oil revenue held in US accounts

‘Stranger Things’ Directors Defend ‘Coming Out’ Scene That Had Fans Outraged

Christmas Drone Strike Killed 11 Christians in War-Torn African Nation

Major Trump Advisor Declares Which Major Red State City Will Replace NYC as Financial Capitol Thanks to Mamdani

Brown University shooting videos show awareness and planning, experts say

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020