Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hegseth Explains Utter Devastation of Iranian Regime’s Defenses – U.S. Close to ‘Uncontested’ Control of Airspace

Trump teases kingmaker endorsement in Texas ‘soon’ to force other candidate out of runoff

Leavitt says ground troops in Iran not currently being considered, doesn’t rule it out

Fact Check: No, Hegseth Did Not Indicate Boots Would Be on the Ground in Iran

Spain urges Trump not to ‘play Russian roulette’ with ‘destiny of millions’ in Iran

NATO defenses shoot down Iranian missile fired toward Turkey, defense ministry says

Trump brings Big Tech executives to White House to curb power costs for American households amid AI boom

Crockett Implies TX Dem Election Chaos in Dallas Was Secretly Racist: ‘I Think We All Know Why’

Dan Crenshaw Loses Primary After Becoming Lone Texas Republican Without Trump’s Endorsement

US ‘winning decisively’ against Iran, will achieve ‘complete control’ of airspace within days, Hegseth says

Metal detector scans front yard of Savannah Guthrie’s missing mother as sister to get car back

Trump May Be Fulfilling a Major Biblical Prophecy – As We Speak, Jeremiah 49 Appears to Be Coming True

Former MLB star Mark Teixeira wins GOP primary in Texas congressional race

Former Red State Mayor Found Guilty After What Her Kids Saw Her Doing

Pentagon identifies 4 of 6 US service members killed in drone attack and more top headlines

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020