Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Tennessee Lawmakers Walk Out of Prayer Against ‘White Christian Nationalism’

Trump’s ‘Blasphemous’ Post Draws Backlash from Christian Conservatives

The simple tax habit that could save you thousands over your lifetime

Lawmakers put expulsion threats atop House agenda as return sets up high-stakes week

Cancer-Stricken Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse Vows To Avoid Being A ‘Pansy A**’ As Life Slips Away

Melania Trump’s Epstein remarks turn up the heat on DOJ, Acting AG Todd Blanche to do more

Machete-Wielding Assailant Calling Himself ‘Lucifer’ Shot Dead by NYPD in Grand Central Station

US military conducts more deadly strikes against vessels of alleged ‘narco-terrorists’

The AI you use every day is biased — and it’s quietly shaping your worldview, new report says

Dinghy route taken by missing American woman and jailed husband recreated as details of disappearance emerge

NYC mayor touts ‘socialist’ wins in first 100 days alongside Bernie Sanders

Trump voices frustration with NATO, says Iranian navy ‘destroyed’ as US preps for blockade

Trump accuses Pope Leo of being ‘terrible’ on foreign policy over pontiff’s anti-war comments

Starved toddler died of neglect after eating diapers, drywall in filthy room, as parents’ room was kept clean

Breaking: Eric Swalwell Suspends Campaign Amid Flurry of Sexual Assault Accusations

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020