Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

House Oversight Committee launches investigation into Walz over alleged Somali fraud

‘Home Improvement’ Star Arrested for 6th Time in 5 Years After Narrowly Avoiding Being Run Over by Fiancée: Police

House Democrats release ‘never-before-seen’ photos and videos of Epstein’s private island

Kevin Costner Set to Tell the True Story of Christmas in ABC Special ‘That Was Unthinkable Even a Couple of Years Ago’

National Guard killing reignites immigration war in Congress as Republicans demand sweeping reforms

Miami mayoral candidate reveals how he will flip script on Dem rival’s ‘city of renters’ strategy

University of Delaware student allegedly mapped out attack on campus police; illegal weapons recovered

Rand Paul Puts Aside Differences, Sends Trump a Personal Message Seeking to Partner on Key Proposal

Ben Stiller’s Attempt to Defend Somalis from Trump Backfires as Social Media Users Offer a Suggestion

Pentagon probe into secret Signal chats on Houthi strikes set to drop Thursday as Hegseth faces scrutiny

WATCH: Three Florida teenagers arrested in viral ‘door kick challenge’ targeting homeowners

US asks Lebanon to return Israeli bomb to prevent capture by Russia or China

Bondi blasts discrimination lawsuit from immigration judge: ‘Last time I checked, I’m a woman too’

Trump peace plan passes in Knesset despite boycott over mention of Palestinian statehood

‘Winter Vomiting Disease’ Is Spreading Rapidly in the US, CDC Data Shows

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020