Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Anti-ICE ‘digital Minutemen’ use military-grade surveillance tactics against feds

Trump claims DNI Tulsi Gabbard was at Georgia election hub search because AG Pam Bondi wanted her there

Jill Biden’s ex-husband, now charged with murder, called wife ‘greatest thing in my life’

Arctic blast fuels scrutiny of Biden’s $8B electric bus push as watchdogs cite oversight failures

Jeffries risks fresh fracture with Schumer over ICE funding red line

Suspect Arrested After 30-Year-Old Woman Is Killed ‘Execution Style’ While Opening Her Business

Far-Left ‘Journalist’ Blames Conservatives After WaPo Layoffs – Apparently We Should Fund Our Own Smear Campaign

‘Anti-ICE Antifa TERRORIST’ arrested in Minneapolis for threatening federal agents: DOJ

Dem rising star who called Trump ‘con man’ spent over $120k on luxury hotels, transportation and security

Targeted for their faith overseas, persecuted Christians get a White House welcome under Trump

Graphic Video: LA Rioters Leave Female Journalist on the Concrete and Anti-ICE Mobs Go After 2 Other Female Journalists in Sanctuary City Nightmare

Trump Gives the Guthrie Family Everything He Can as Search Continues: ‘We Are Deploying All Resources’

The legal case for and against nationalizing elections

Illinois bar owner killed in ‘execution-style’ shooting, suspect with decades-long criminal record in custody

Pennsylvania hospital blaze forces patients to be evacuated

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020