Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

For This Dem Judge, a Gay Man’s Life Is Only Worth $765 and 30 Days in Jail When It’s Taken by a Black Woman

Woman Has Part of Her Face Bitten Off in Random ‘Zombie Bite’ Attack

Florida GOP nominee blasts 20-year Dem incumbent as a ‘socialist’ rubber-stamp with ‘precious little to show’

WATCH: DHS issues stark warning after 300 ‘hostile’ cartel drones detected at southern border

Erika Kirk sounds off after long-awaited university report on husband’s assassination

Federal illegal voting arrest becomes latest flashpoint in Sherrill’s battles with Trump administration

BREAKING: Trump Handed Huge Election Win as Supreme Court Allows Voter Verification Database to Stand

Reporter’s Notebook: Democrats face an impeachment tractor beam that could derail their affordability message

Trump Gets China’s Xi Jinping to Belly Laugh While Showing Him Biden White House ‘Autopen’ Photo

Trump and Xi compare histories during National Archives visit

Xi assured Trump he would cease aid to Iran, US ambassador to China claims

Ole Miss toxicology reports expected soon and results may trigger anti-fentanyl law, official says

DHS Pleads with Far-Left Public Officials to Tone Down Anti-ICE Rhetoric Amid 1,600 Percent Increase in Assaults

Suspect in Pittsburgh doctor’s murder had been released without bail on prior burglary charge: court docs

‘Red carpet for a despot’: Trump’s lavish Xi welcome collides with GOP anti-communism message

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020