Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hegseth Takes House Dem to the Woodshed for Pushing Iranian ‘Propaganda’ at Hearing: ‘Shame on You!’

Minnesota ‘tried to cover up fraud allegations,’ former state trooper alleges

Class and Decency: Watch Johnny Carson Address Reagan Assassination Attempt the Day After It Happened

Bodycam shows dad bolt from cops with young child in his arms before ditching her alone in the woods

Trump DOJ report lays bare Biden administration’s alleged anti-Christian bias

WATCH: Chaos erupts as Florida Dem in pink jumpsuit grabs bullhorn mid-vote: ‘It’s illegal!’

Dem Rep Who Resigned in Disgrace Over Federal Charges Quietly Made Move to Run Again Before Quitting: Reports

David Allan Coe, Outlaw Country Legend Behind ‘Take This Job and Shove It,’ Dies at 86

Biden IRS discriminated against Christian groups, DOJ report finds

Federal appeals court refuses to rehear Trump appeal of $83M E Jean Carroll defamation judgment

Hunter Biden’s ex-lawyer ordered to pay $50K to former Trump aide after harassment claims crumble

Graham urges Trump to ‘ignore’ war powers deadline as GOP grapples with Iran

Cultural groups ask federal judge to halt Trump’s renovations of Kennedy Center

Georgia man says he suffered severe medical neglect leading to amputations at scrutinized Atlanta jail

LAPD chief warns Los Angeles not prepared to secure 2028 Olympics due to staffing shortages

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020