Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Melania Trump debuts ‘Home Is Where The Heart Is’ as White House 2025 Christmas theme

Indiana GOP unveils draft of congressional map that carves up Indianapolis

Muslim Father and Sons Charged with Brutally Murdering Daughter for Her ‘Western’ Lifestyle

Playing God: Bill Gates Pushes Use of Sun-Dimming Technology at ‘Climate Tipping Point’

Appeals court finds Alina Habba unlawfully served as New Jersey prosecutor

NFL Coaching Legend Blasts Massive Issue He Saw While Watching Thanksgiving Games

Trump hit with setback as court rules Alina Habba unlawfully served as top federal prosecutor in New Jersey

Trump Admin Negotiators Make High-Stakes Visit to Russia After ‘Successful’ Ukraine Meeting

Reporter’s Notebook: Tennessee special election eyed as Trump referendum ahead of midterms

Trump invites families of two National Guard members shot in DC to White House, plans to honor soldiers

Trump offers to release his October MRI results, insists scan wasn’t of his brain

Foreign terror labels curb ISIS, but US radicals face fewer limits online, study finds

War Sec Pete Hegseth shares meme of children’s book character firing on narco terrorist drug boat

Slain National Guardsman Wanted to ‘Make a Difference’ During Trump Deployment, Felt the National Guard Should Do More

Trump Confirms US Stranglehold Over Venezuelan Airspace: ‘Closed in Its Entirety’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020