Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Mike Rowe Sues Discovery for $2 Million in ‘Deadliest Catch’ Dispute

Erika’s Heartbreaking Reaction to a Woman She Saw in the Courtroom Crying Over Charlie’s Murder

Bernie-backed socialist who allied with Platner could supplant him on ballot

WATCH: Dana White drops 2028 hints while raving about his favorite Trump cabinet secretary

Donald Trump sparks intrigue by ditching new Qatari jet for old Air Force One

Trump contemplates assassinating more Iranian leaders, warns he ‘may be gone too’ after topping Tehran’s ‘kill list’

Alleged Jan. 6 pipe bomber Brian Cole Jr.’s trial set for February

Three-time deported illegal immigrant charged with killing North Carolina girl, 6, after running stop sign

West Virginia town fires entire police force after chief resigns, sergeant alleges evidence room break-in

Doctors Issue Warnings as Popular Toy Inflicts Horrific Injuries on Kids

Trump Opts Against Flying New Air Force One Home from Turkey

Trump envoy warns China’s power move at sea is threat ‘we cannot afford to ignore’

Socialists set sights on Taylor Swift after ‘tacky’ NYC wedding sparks left-wing backlash

Trump ordered to pay $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll as judge rejects request to delay payout

DOJ records reveal possible classified security lapses inside Jack Smith’s office during Trump prosecution

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020