Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

EXCLUSIVE: Inside Trump’s private schedule as media fixates on his health

Obese man on death row chooses buffet of BBQ, wings, cheeseburger, pizza, ice cream for last meal in Georgia

Florida influencer, 41, accused of inappropriately touching, exposing herself to teenage son’s friend

Republican House leader signals plan to begin contempt proceedings against Bill and Hillary Clinton

Watch: Tim Walz Tries to Make Somali Fraud Scandal Seem Perfectly Normal, Blames Trump for Talking About It

Elon Musk Sets Newsom Straight on ‘Trans Kids’ After Governor’s Office Attacks Musk’s Family

James Carville Criticizes Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Bid, Says She’s Too Self-Centered to Win

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Omar accused of opening door to massive Minneapolis fraud

Gabbard blasts Democrat Bennie Thompson for calling National Guard shooting an ‘unfortunate accident’

FDA Set to Give COVID Vaccines Serious ‘Black Box’ Designation: Report

DOJ asks appeals court to halt Boasberg’s contempt hearing next week

‘Incompetence or dereliction’: Minnesota lawmaker rips Tim Walz as state fraud losses mount

DHS sweeps Twin Cities, arrests 400 as feds blast Walz for ‘failing to protect Minnesota’

DOJ Sues Four States for Violating Federal Election Law

Atlanta High School Locked Down After Defenseless Student Is Repeatedly Stabbed

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020