Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Ex-Obama advisor mocked after questioning Chicago’s response to unconscious man: ‘Own a mirror?’

Secret Service missed ‘multiple opportunities’ to prevent Trump assassination attempt: watchdog

Watch: Young Americans Turn National Mall Into Wild Celebration of Patriotism as US Scores Big World Cup Win

Before 1776: Rediscovering America’s first chapter at Jamestown

Watch: Pete Hegseth Skewers ‘Blinded by Ideology’ Protesters Who Interrupted Moment of Silence for Fallen Soldier

Secret Service debuts new badge for all personnel: ‘Represents unity’

Thunderbirds to race cars: Inside Horsepower of America at the Great American State Fair

Video shows moments before Army veteran was fatally shot in Walmart parking lot dispute

WWII pilot missing after secret spy mission finally accounted for more than 80 years later

Trump’s ‘hero’ justice offers roadmap after Supreme Court rejects birthright order

Former KKK Grand Wizard praises Mamdani-endorsed socialist’s stance on interracial marriage

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Declares War on the Senate Over SAVE America Act

MUST SEE: The Moment Actual Rough Riders Escort Trump’s Motorcade to the Teddy Roosevelt Library

Couple who climbed Empire State Building for engagement out on ‘supervised release’

Vatican says SSPX in schism, affirms excommunication of laity and clerics

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020