Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Appeals Court Sides With Texas on 10 Commandments in Classroom, Overruling Lower Court

Chuck Schumer’s Attempt to Defend the SPLC from Stunning Indictment Earns Him Mockery

Federal court blocks Newsom’s bid to shackle ICE in Trump immigration win

Dem senator likens ICE operations in American streets to oppressive British regime during Revolutionary War

Idaho murders: New book on Kohberger reveals previously unseen evidence, claims sheath could be inadmissible

Trump Rips SCOTUS a New One: Dems Don’t Need to Add Justices Because the Court Is ‘Already Packed’ for Them

Marine veteran allegedly gunned down by husband in attack outside home, police say

Biden Loves to Say His WH Bid Was Sparked by Charlottesville Rally, Which DOJ Says the SPLC Helped Plan

Trump claims Iran ‘starving for cash,’ ‘collapsing financially’ after extending ceasefire

EXCLUSIVE: Planned Parenthood set for massive taxpayer windfall if Senate fails to act

China decries Japanese prime minister for World War II shrine support

Anthropic’s moral compass architect suggested AI overcorrection could address historical injustices

Supreme Court liberals side with Clarence Thomas on Taliban suicide bomber lawsuit, 3 others dissent

ActBlue employees pleaded the Fifth 146 times in depositions. Here’s what they didn’t want to answer

Myrtle Beach man with lengthy arrest record charged with stabbing two people in popular beach destination

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020