Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

BREAKING: Former Prince Andrew Arrested in Epstein Case

DC Mayor Bowser declares emergency over Potomac sewage spill, asks for federal help

RNC sues to stop Democrats’ Virginia redistricting push

Inside ICE’s battle with local Democrats to convert warehouses into detention centers

Strapped New Yorkers swarm chaotic Mamdani-inspired free grocery store pop-up: We’re ‘in pain’

Trump hits campaign trail in key battleground as race to replace Marjorie Taylor Greene heats up

Is DEI Dead? Jasmine Crockett’s Texas Senate Run Seems Like an Afterthought Following Colbert’s James Talarico Stunt

LATE BREAKING: Massive Guthrie Kidnapping Break – FBI Now Has Names and Photos of Suspects

Hiker dies of hypothermia after slipping off trail near summit of New York’s tallest mountain

Grandmother tells Trump critics to ‘get off the man’s back’ during White House Black History Month event

DHS shutdown leaves local emergency responders on their own amid extreme weather, expert warns

Detroit officers facing termination for allegedly contacting immigration authorities during traffic stops

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani reverses course on homeless encampments after pausing clearings

Trump DOJ probes Michigan schools over gender curriculum, joins lawsuit against LA race-based program

3rd arrested in violent overnight home invasion, multiple illegal aliens accused of sexual assault, kidnapping

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020