Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

James Talarico needles Ken Paxton amid GOP midterm convention

Illegal convicted of assaulting high school girls thought he was free — then DHS dropped the hammer

How to make more Charlie Kirks: Inside TPUSA’s gap-year alternative to the ‘college scam’

Watch: Spontaneous Tribute to Charlie Kirk Erupts as Trump Honors Erika at RNC Midterm Convention

In Hindsight, Trump’s Decision to Save TikTok Was a Colossal Mistake

National Cryptologic Museum unveils historic Osama bin Laden exhibit

Republican sounds alarm on rising Dem star: ‘This guy’s going to be a problem’

Zohran Mamdani urged to skip New York City’s 9/11 memorial: ‘Vile antisemite’

Houthis seize port city in offensive aimed toward Bab el-Mandeb Strait

Richard Hudson’s three keys to holding the House, and why midterm conventions are here to stay

Illegal Alien Charged with Kidnapping 6-Year-Old Girl From Her Home and Sexually Assaulting Her

Charlie Kirk’s Death Was a Singular Tragedy, But Part of a Wider Surge in Leftist Violence

9/11 hero Welles Crowther’s firehouse president reveals what shaped the ‘man in the red bandana’

Lone holdout in Lindsay Clancy trial demonstrated the killings during deliberations, fellow juror says

Trump dangles $5,000 checks as debt surges — but only if GOP can clear major midterm hurdle

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020