Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Florida Woman Kills Man Arrested for Murdering His Father

NBA Vet Enes Kanter Freedom Sends Letter with 5 Deadly Questions to WNBA Commissioner After Ejection from Arena

Dolly Parton: Tribute to an American icon

Trump’s tougher round-two birthright citizenship strategy hinges on key legal distinction, experts say

Trump administration helps end Armenia and Azerbaijan’s forever war

Appeals court delivers unsettling ruling — and says Supreme Court left it no choice

Meet the MAGA-rapping sticker mogul running to replace Elise Stefanik in Congress

‘Tony’ is an annoying, unimpressive biopic of Anthony Bourdain

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott moves to cut state funding for AI-powered Flock cameras amid privacy concerns

WATCH: Wanted man escapes cops twice by running onto freeway, then walks into their Panda Express lunch

Nashville airport could be renamed in honor of Dolly Parton

NYC Judge Frees Man Accused of Shooting Service Dog of Woman with Down Syndrome While Attempting to Kill Man

Big Bend border wall construction pause extended to September

DOJ Arrests Honduran Man Accused of Taking Advantage of California’s Weak Election Laws

Bryan Kohberger seeks judge’s removal in escalating bid to undo guilty plea

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020