Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital

DOJ quietly closes autopen investigation targeting Biden and aides

Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire

GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge

Unearthed video shows Dem candidate supporting ‘reallocation’ of police funding to social service programs

Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns

Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected

BREAKING: Senate Rejects Dems’ War Powers Resolution Trying to Tie Trump’s Hands on Iran

DHS defends McLaughlin against allegations husband’s company profited millions from ad contracts: ‘Baseless’

Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who died by suicide: ‘Lapse in judgment’

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Feels the Heat During Fraud Hearing in DC: ‘You Should Go to Jail’

FBI spox unleashes on media’s ‘transparent spin job’ that recent firings were ‘devastating’ to Iran work

Pam Bondi faces bipartisan subpoena over frustration with DOJ’s release of Epstein files

Pritzker Tries to Laugh Off Bill Clinton’s Under Oath Statement That Illinois Governor Traveled with Epstein

Developing: FBI Investigating as Mystery ‘Holocaust 2.0’ Messages Make Their Way to Stanford Students

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020