Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Battle over federal courthouses erupts as GSA warns against giving judiciary more control

FL Voters Boot Cory Mills, the GOP Rep. Who Helped Keep Ilhan Omar from Being Stripped of Her Committee Assignments

The last January 6 case? Former DC police officer fighting conviction over contact with ex-Proud Boys leader

Trump urged to stop targeting fellow Republicans as GOP fights to keep majority

Biden admin released illegal immigrant accused of fatally stabbing Fairfax County mother

How one NYC suburb could decide which party controls the House

Freedom 250 Grand Prix preview: What to know if you’re attending the fastest weekend in DC

Misleading polls fuel socialist hopes that come crashing down on Election Day

CBP officers seize nearly 850 pounds of khat packed into 12 suitcases after flight from London

Alina Habba shuts down speculation she could replace Karoline Leavitt as White House press secretary

Pennsylvania State Police helicopter, small plane collide in midair, killing 1 and injuring 2 state troopers

Missouri judge hands Trump, GOP major redistricting win ahead of midterm elections

Idaho county probation officers compile ‘foreign-born list’ to hand over to ICE as critics raise alarms

Chinese national in blue state charged with illegally voting in federal election under another man’s name: DOJ

Parents seek six figures from surrogate who refused abortion after baby’s heart diagnosis: report

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020