Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

BREAKING: Heartbreak in Nancy Guthrie Case as Note Believed to Be from Kidnappers Confirms She Is Dead

Prominent businessman learns fate in boat crash case that killed teen, maimed another

US official says JD Vance made ‘great progress’ in Iran talks, calls snub reports ‘foreign propaganda’

Ilhan Omar’s New Financial Disclosure Takes Americans for Fools – Claims Spouse Made as Little as $200 in 2025

Los Angeles schools superintendent Alberto Carvalho resigns amid FBI probe

Job-Seekers Learn New Hack That Makes Landing Jobs Easier, But It Also Humiliates Every College, University in US

Chicago priest tells Trump to ‘shut up’ and restore gun violence prevention funding after deadly weekend

Trump-backed housing overhaul targeting Wall Street investors clears Senate

Elon Musk Threatens Legal Action Against Ro Khanna After Congressman’s Outrageous Lie

DOJ investigating NYC coffee shop over hostile social post about pro-Israel politician

Vance takes lead selling Trump’s Iran gamble as Rubio, Hegseth and Ratcliffe cede spotlight on fragile deal

Fox News Poll: Voters embrace health agenda while rating RFK Jr negatively

ALERT: US Military Helicopter Has Reportedly Crashed – Details Still Coming In

Attorney General Todd Blanche Provides Update on World Cup Shooting Suspect

Dr. Jordan Peterson Gives Health Update, Shares Plan to Keep Reaching Fans During Hiatus

See also Alan Greenspan dies at age 100

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020