Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

House approves MTG-sponsored bill to criminalize gender transition treatment for minors

Trump sends troops $1,776 bonus checks, and Biden coal, in Christmas speech to nation

NY Gov. Hochul to sign bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide: ‘Who am I to deny you?’

Trump drops receipts on US savings since Biden’s Oval Office exit

Trump touts bringing country back from ‘brink of ruin’

Lethal US strike sinks narco-terrorist vessel along major Pacific drug route, Pentagon confirms

Border Patrol chief, progressive mayor caught on camera in tense street showdown: ‘Excellent day in Evanston’

Federal employees in the hot seat as GOP senator pushes transparency proposal: ‘Historic opportunity’

Dramatic bodycam video captures moment suspected kidnapper is arrested after 40 years on the run

Barack and Michelle Obama Had Plans with the Reiners on the Night of Their Death

Ford Pays a $19.5 Billion Price After Realizing it Fell for Biden’s EV Scam

Statue of Little-Known Civil Rights Activist Replaces Robert E. Lee in U.S. Capitol

Breaking: Bongino Stepping Down as Deputy Director of the FBI

Nearly two-thirds of American voters back social media ban for kids under 16, Fox News poll shows

Trump set to address the nation in primetime White House speech as Americans report economic squeeze

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020