Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Detroit sisters accused of stabbing restaurant worker after wrong food order

Trump mixes sports and patriotism with UFC Freedom 250 ‘spectacle’

UFC Freedom 250 White House event: Photos

Sean Strickland removed from UFC White House event by Secret Service

National Guardsman pleads guilty to fatal shooting of soldier he found in bed with his ex-girlfriend

Eric Trump denies asking former UFC star if White House fights were rigged

Trump announces peace deal with Iran, declares Strait of Hormuz will reopen: ‘Let the oil flow!’

Trump arrives for UFC fight

Boston police arrest 14-year-old after masked suspects allegedly rob siblings’ lemonade stand

Congressional baseball game offers longstanding traditions, and plenty of confusion

11 skydivers, one pilot killed in Missouri plane crash near airport

Sen Mitch McConnell hospitalized, ‘receiving excellent care,’ his office says

Republican leaders embrace viral World Cup fans they say are discovering the ‘real America’

Gabbard says declassified biolab records validate concerns previously dismissed as misinformation

Trump marks 80th birthday, now second octogenarian sitting president: ‘Seemed to utterly defy age’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020