Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Man dead, another critical after double stabbing at Brooklyn park as police detain person of interest: NYPD

Trump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory

Louisiana Democrats pick rural farmer to challenge GOP in uphill Senate bid

Ketanji Brown Jackson Really Worried Judges Might Actually Apply Second Amendment In Gun Cases

Taxpayer Dollars May Have Funded Education Of CCP Assets, Report Reveals

Parents of 7-year-old who died weighing 255 pounds charged with murder in suspected neglect case

Red States Unite Against California Over It’s Alleged Plot To Impose Green Agenda On Nation

New York Might Make Mamdani’s City-Owned Grocery Stores Permanent

NY AG hopeful blasts Letitia James as Medicaid fraud recoveries collapse: ‘She’s not doing the job’

Trump nominates Oklahoma law enforcement veteran Lance Schroyer to lead ICE as permanent director

Two 14-year-olds flee MTA officers, remain missing after vanishing from New Jersey train station

Judge rules Dan Sullivan can appear on Alaska primary ballot against Sen. Dan Sullivan

Jeffries welcomes Democratic Socialists into the fold as critics warn party is revealing ‘exactly who it is’

Polygamous sect leader convicted of abuse charges after girls found in trailer on Arizona highway

Hezbollah rejects Israel and Lebanon’s peace framework: ‘Null and void’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020