Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Michigan Democrats propose package seeking to legalize assisted suicide

Minnesota Senate votes to ban ICE from wearing masks, allow residents to sue for constitutional violations

Survey work begins at proposed site of Trump’s Triumphal Arch in DC

Liberal arts college drops prof’s name from campus hall after grave dig controversy

Suspected roadway gunman with reported criminal history sparks outrage after drivers shot

Stacey Abrams hit with subpoena in alleged campaign finance violations saga: ‘No one is above the law’

California mayor accused of secretly working for China, spreading propaganda while in office: feds

‘I’m not some hooker’: GOP senators release Hunter Biden texts buried by DOJ

Members of Congress using online prediction markets? Don’t bet on it

Texas man accused in pregnant wife’s murder fights to remain in Italy, citing ‘lifestyle and culture’

Breaking: UAE Has Been Secretly Striking Iran, Fighting Alongside US and Israel

John Cornyn under fire from MAGA base over anti-Trump post

San Antonio Spurs Superstar Ejected After Vicious Hit – Should the NBA Suspend Him?

Trump ‘seriously considering’ plan to make Venezuela and its $40 trillion in oil permanent part of USA

Watch: Military Veteran Scores the Biggest Payday in ‘Price Is Right’ History

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020