Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Attacks Against Christians Rise in Major European Country

Pence says Iran agreement ‘smacks of the kind of appeasement’ Trump rejected in prior term

Supreme Court Allows Gun Ruling Favoring Letitia James to Stand

Obama Center isn’t a traditional presidential library. Critics say it’s an activism center.

NYPD cop shoots suspect attempting to flee in stolen vehicle, officials say

Georgia pair charged with murder after bartender’s dismembered remains found in lake outside Atlanta

Southwest jet struck by ground equipment vehicle at Memphis airport

Second Amendment Groups Target Purple State’s Decades-Long ‘Permission Slip’ Scheme With New Lawsuit

Artificial Intelligence May Change American Healthcare Forever, Study Suggests

Judge Demands Public See the Truth About Karmelo Anthony, Orders Release of Footage Surrounding Murder

Concertgoer dies after apparent fall from upper level at Madison Square Garden

‘The Era of Deportations Has Begun’: European Parliament Passes Toughest Immigration Policy in Decades

Multiple hikers dead amid scorching Grand Canyon temperatures

Mark Levin blasts Trump administration over Israel: ‘Stop trashing, smearing, bullying’ ally

Trump’s Iran gamble divides GOP hawks and ‘America First’ conservatives over what victory looks like

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020