Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Nancy Guthrie investigators see uptick in tips after ransom notes release: Sheriff

Alex Murdaugh demands new evidence search in hunt for cracks in case

Blanche’s Attorney General Confirmation Hanging in the Balance After 2nd Republican Announces Opposition

Mother of Slain Citadel Cadet Speaks Out After Repeat Criminal Is Arrested for His Murder

Resurfaced Mamdani interview ignites internet frenzy over alleged ‘fake’ Ugandan accent

Anti-abortion groups applaud Blanche review of Biden DOJ policy on mailing abortion drugs

GOP senator deals crushing blow to Trump’s AG nominee after Alaska lobbying blitz

What Do Jesus and the Bible Have to Say About Socialism?

Trump-backed incumbent ousted in House primary as GOP redistricting push set to reshape Tennessee

Trump’s Smithsonian clash exposes striking pattern among museum curators

Trump-backed incumbent loses primary after super PAC bankrolled by Dems meddled in race

Mamdani repeatedly sidesteps questions on reported plan to revive tax hikes on wealthy New Yorkers

Retired police chief helps subdue passenger after alleged midair outburst over alcohol cutoff

Squad-backed ‘Tennessee Three’ lawmaker wins House primary in newly redrawn district

Conservative firebrand who went viral with anti-CCP ad survives key primary

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020