Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Small-town Virginia mayor reportedly arrested for allegedly showing up drunk to train derailment

Romanian national learns fate for swatting US officials, including members of Congress, judges

Melania Trump embraces AI education initiative in White House tech push: ‘She’s been a champion’

‘The View’ Floats Dangerous Conspiracy Theory About Trump Days After Assassination Attempt, Draws Response from White House

Why The Supreme Court’s Landmark Elections Decision Is a ‘Game Changer’ for the Midterms and Beyond

Trump weighs pulling US troops from Germany amid clash with chancellor over Iran war

Trump EPA chief vows he won’t take ‘morality lessons’ from Dem senator after heated clash

Newsom mocks Trump’s limited-edition passport with fake California driver’s license featuring gov’s portrait

UnitedHealthcare Fires Employee Who Said She Was Sad Trump Assassin Failed: ‘Violence is Never Acceptable’

United Airlines Flight Reportedly Struck by a Drone at 3,000 Feet

Members of heretical Muslim cult arrested in UK accused of sex offenses, forced marriage, and slavery

Prosecutors drop reference to injured Secret Service agent in latest filing amid confusion over Trump assassination case

FBI reveals Brown University mass shooter began plotting massacre as early as 2022, blamed victims

Kohberger defense team says it is ‘appalled’ by former expert’s public comments about Idaho murders case

Rashida Tlaib slams anti-israel Arab group over handling of sexual harassment claims

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020