Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump Scorches 2 SCOTUS Justices by Name: ‘Democrats don’t really need to “PACK THE COURT”‘

Watch: Trump Blasts NFL Over Possible Amazon, Netflix Deal – Says Many Fans ‘Don’t Make Enough Money to Pay’

ActBlue scrutiny fuels new GOP bills to tighten election donation rules

Alabama AG makes Supreme Court play that could deal decisive blow in redistricting war

GOP lawmaker unveils historic move to ‘expunge’ both ‘maliciously false’ impeachments against Trump

Trump says Iran’s latest proposal reneges on giving up enriched material: ‘Are they stupid people?’

Developing: Virginia Dems Plotting Overthrow of Entire State Supreme Court to Save Redistricting Scheme

Two Israeli Soldiers Sentenced to Prison for Desecration of Mary Statue

WHCA dinner gunman pleads not guilty to attempted Trump assassination charges

WHCA Dinner shooting suspect Cole Allen pleads not guilty, judge scoffs at defense’s power play

Footage shows moments before Frontier Airlines jet struck person on Denver airport runway

Democrats consider plan to wipe conservatives off Virginia Supreme Court: Report

Jeff Landry dismisses concerns about 45,000 discarded ballots after suspended primaries: ‘It’s not my fault’

Former Dem gov in hot seat for ‘complete failure’ in ‘INSANE’ early release of thousands of inmates

House Freedom Caucus vows ‘gloves are coming off’ as FISA deadline looms

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020