Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Music and patriotism: Dukes of Hazzard star praises community and family at Great American State Fair

Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing: Judge orders redactions to ex-lover’s video testimony

Social media influencer and model, 22, killed in violent highway crash

Trump threatens troop withdrawals if ‘very good deal’ on Greenland isn’t struck

House Dem back in the spotlight as brother faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted

Platner drops out of crucial Senate race after bombshell rape allegation torpedoes campaign

Franklin Graham Gives McDonald’s ‘Free Advice’ on How to ‘Bring Happy Customers Back’

Who is Valli Geiger? Meet the Maine Dem that Platner urged to run for Senate

Mike Rowe Sues Discovery for $2 Million in ‘Deadliest Catch’ Dispute

Erika’s Heartbreaking Reaction to a Woman She Saw in the Courtroom Crying Over Charlie’s Murder

Former Wisconsin Judge Who Was Convicted of Helping an Illegal Alien Evade ICE Gets Light Sentence

Bernie-backed socialist who allied with Platner could supplant him on ballot

WATCH: Dana White drops 2028 hints while raving about his favorite Trump cabinet secretary

Donald Trump sparks intrigue by ditching new Qatari jet for old Air Force One

Potential 2028 Dem contender unloads on Netanyahu, admits US-Israel ties at ‘crossroads’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020