Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Karl Rove to Vote for Pro-Trans Dem After GOP Candidate Shares Texas Student Section Pic

Watch: Chiefs Used a Clever Bit of ‘Gamesmanship’ During TV Timeouts to Gain an Edge Over the Broncos

Minnesota attorney general says Somali Muslims have been defrauded by housing scheme claiming to be sharia-compliant

EXCLUSIVE: Inside Vance’s intimate Capitol Hill huddle as Republicans confront tough midterm terrain

Judge bars Kennedy Center board from putting Trump’s name on building at all

Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz’s ‘effective altruism’ network tied to AI regulation push

Pentagon Inspector General Says Iran War Has Caused ‘Strategic Inventory Shortfalls’ of U.S. Munitions

Former CNN Host Reveals Father Beat Her Until She Was ‘Black and Blue’

Lindsay Clancy judge indefinitely impounds juror names, citing safety and ‘divisive’ attention

Army veteran paratrooper who deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan before helping rescue Fox News reporter dead at 50

China expert warns Beijing wants Americans — not the CCP — to spread its message

Oil squeeze tightens as Iran-backed attacks cripple Hormuz escape routes

Many RNC Convention Attendees Balked at Trump’s Plan to Cut $5K Checks for Americans

Tucker Carlson Defends El-Sayed on 9/11, Condemns His GOP Opponent Mike Rogers

Smithsonian’s dark take on America exposed: Washington dubbed ‘town destroyer,’ Revolutionary War ‘dangerous’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020