Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Intense Footage: Police Officer with No Protective Gear Sprints Into Burning House and Saves Entire Family

Court Overturns Former Attorney Alex Murdaugh’s Double Murder Convictions

Dem Senate hopeful’s ‘physician’ campaign pitch under fire after license records reveal key gaps

Massie’s ex-girlfriend alleges he arranged her Capitol Hill job, then offered $5,000 to drop termination suit

Veterans group backing Iowa Democrat’s Senate bid is bankrolled by Schumer-aligned PAC

Trump struggles to shake ballroom backlash: ‘We don’t have the money’

Democrats’ midterm push clouded by infighting over party keeping 2024 autopsy under wraps

New 9/11 Museum exhibit aims to connect younger Americans to the attacks through powerful artifacts

Finland has ‘exactly the same position’ as Trump on NATO failures but pleads not to let Russia, China divide the West

Trump and Cabinet officials welcomed by Xi at China’s Great Hall of the People

CIA Accused of Raiding Tulsi Gabbard’s Office Seizing JFK, MKUltra Documents Set for Declassification

Trump’s upbeat China message collides with deepening Beijing rivalry

China rolls out red carpet for Trump as Xi meeting tests trade, Taiwan tensions

AG aims to retry Alex Murdaugh ‘quickly’; both sides enter courtroom chess match with each other’s game plans

California death row inmates watching porn on taxpayer-funded tablets, evading security controls: report

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020