Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Two arrested in NC after police find 13-year-old kept in dog kennel, 5 other kids in ‘filthy’ home

Heart-pounding video shows fisherman leaping into ocean to save great white shark

Pete Hegseth signs memo opening door for troops to carry personal firearms on bases

Florida, Mississippi join wave of states tightening voter citizenship rules

Trump Announces Plan to Help DHS Workers in Spite of ‘Radical Left’ Shutdown

Report: The Last Straw That Led to Trump Firing Pam Bondi Had to Do with Eric Swalwell

ActBlue’s lawyers said it may have misled Congress on foreign donations: Report

Army chief of staff ordered to retire immediately as Hegseth continues Pentagon shakeup

Watch: Trump Declares that Because of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection, ‘Not One Thing Can Separate Humanity from the Power of God’s Everlasting Love’

Trump supporter allegedly killed by ex-coworker who expressed ‘animosity’ over political beliefs: complaint

GOP rails against ‘s— sandwich’ deal as all eyes turn to House to end DHS shutdown

Girl Who Went Missing in 1994 Found Alive

Man accused of killing parents with hammer, knife, then calling 911 to confess: report

Harris ripped over video previewing Trump speech she claims she wouldn’t watch: ‘Sit this one out’

Utter Humiliation: Watch Dem Rep Ask 100 People at Black Church to Raise a Hand if They Don’t Have ID – What Happens Next Is Priceless

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020