Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

US military releases footage of massive operation to rescue injured airman stranded inside Iran

Multiple death sentences in different states are set to be carried out within 24 hours: ‘Not very common’

Texas Senate candidate Talarico said US was ‘backsliding’ on democracy in resurfaced clip

7 Republicans rebel against Trump, vote with Dems to rein in Iran war powers

Fourth Florida resident dies after contracting flesh-eating bacteria linked to oysters

Washington Democrat claims majority of recent DHS arrestees posed ‘no threat to public safety’

Injured climber crawls ‘through the night’ to safety after falling 500 feet down California mountain

Republican upsets party-backed rival to challenge first openly trans member of Congress

Lawmakers throw out ‘Trojan horse’ activists they say are engaged in American subversion

Watch: Accused Child Sex Predator Literally Faints in Front of Judge After Learning Penalty He’s Facing

Federal judge refers Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner to DOJ for possible criminal investigation

President Trump Nominates Franklin Graham’s Daughter for Key Religious Freedom Position

Nancy Mace Wants Lindsay Clancy Executed, And Says ‘It Should Be Public’

Judge refers Philadelphia district attorney to federal prosecutors over handling of murder case

Senate moves to rein in college sports ‘Wild West’ with sweeping new rules for players, schools

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020