Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Ellen DeGeneres Comes Crawling Back to US After Fleeing Post-Trump Victory, Buys $27 Million California Mansion

Virginia Democrat gives profanity-laced response to Cruz’s criticism of the state’s redistricting push

Trump Admin Discovers ‘Staggering’ Billions Stolen in Suspected California Small Business Fraud

Two teens arrested after 15-year-old shot near Washington DC’s Union Station

Bishop Ronald Hicks replaces Dolan as Archbishop of New York with installation at St Patrick’s

Trump Announces ‘Clues’ Found in Nancy Guthrie Disappearance: ‘We Could Have Some Answers’

Man arrested for allegedly threatening to kill JD Vance was in possession of child sexual abuse materials: DOJ

‘Superhuman’ Boy, 13, Swims 4 Hours in Frigid Water then Runs Over a Mile to Rescue His Mother, Sister, and Brother Lost at Sea

Trump says nuclear talks in Oman were ‘very good,’ claims Iran wants a deal ‘very badly’

DeSantis celebrates end of ‘witch hunt’ after Trump DOJ reportedly drops Hope Florida Foundation complaint

Trump vows to ‘unleash’ commercial fishing off New England, reversing Obama-era Atlantic restrictions

Ex-‘Squad’ Dem appears to be leaning on radical activist at center of damning Tlaib report in comeback bid

Deadly Consequences: Illegal Alien Who Was Released by Biden Administration Accused of Killing Innocent Man

Virginia Dems take tax hikes into overtime, target fantasy football leagues

Republican majority at risk? A look at the 6 GOP Senate seats most in jeopardy in midterm elections

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020