Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump orders War Dept to postpone strikes on Iranian energy sites, citing ‘productive’ talks to end war

Iran’s Alarming Long-Range Missile Capacity Revealed After Regime Fired at US-UK Base 2,500 Miles Away

Dem Senate candidate in the hot seat after anti-meat comment resurfaces: ‘This will haunt him’

Trump Reacts to Robert Mueller’s Death: ‘Good, I’m Glad He’s Dead’

Biden officials who backed Microsoft software breached by China now work for Microsoft

9 suspects arrested after $7M in stolen cargo seized in Southern California bust

Man charged in $90M Medicare fraud scheme; DOJ says suspect may have entered US illegally

Duffy predicts ‘worse’ wait times will increase shutdown pressure on Democrats

Illegal immigrant charged with killing Loyola student released under Biden, DHS says

As cattle herds shrink and beef prices rise, investors back AI cow collars

Stephen A. Smith Stunned When Kevin Kiley Tells Him California Bans Voter ID Requirements

Travelers in Airport Shop Get Shock of Their Lives When Stuffed Animal Staring at Them Turns Out to Not Be Stuffed at All

Schumer knocks Trump on Iran, plan to send ICE to airports: ‘Asking for trouble’

New Whitey Bulger Writings Suggest Man in Prison for Murder Was ‘Sacrificial Lamb’ to Protect Corrupt FBI Agent

Mamdani’s estate tax plan could drive wealth out of state, critics warn

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020