Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

ICE Arrests Somali Illegal Alien Sex Offender in Minneapolis – Tim Walz Let Him ‘Prowl the Streets’ for Years

Watch: White House Fires Back Against Jimmy Kimmel’s ‘Sick Depravity’ in Wake of Minneapolis Shooting

Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Rubio takes aim at Israel’s enemies in Venezuela

Noem says Trump administration is ‘on offense,’ using ‘every single tool that we have’ to protect Americans

Mamdani adviser, Warren in the hot seat as collapse of Roomba maker shifts data to China

Vance calls Walz ‘a joke,’ claims Minnesota governor enabled massive fraud

Iran reportedly cuts internet as anti-government protests swell: What to know

Judge disqualifies New York US attorney and tosses subpoenas against Letitia James

Vance demand Democrats answer whether ICE officer in Minneapolis shooting was ‘wrong in defending his life’

GOP senators join Democrats to stop Trump from policing Venezuela

Trump Takes Hatchet to Globalists: Ends Funding and Withdraws US for Dozens of UN and Dozens More Non-UN Bodies

Trump pulls US from UN’s ‘premier’ agreement on climate change in sweeping order

Breaking: Agitators Flock to Minneapolis Federal Building, Clash with ICE Officers

Security guard fatally shot outside Houston restaurant after confrontation with suspect

China Detains More Underground Christians in January After Rounding up More Than 100 in December

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020