Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

NYPD cop’s killer convicted of manslaughter, not guilty of murder after split jury ordered to deliberate more

Sham Philadelphia coffee shop hiding crack operation busted in sweeping raid, 17 arrested: AG

Behind the scenes of Congress’ eleventh-hour rush to fund the DHS

Trump says Iran ‘no longer a threat’ after 32 days — outlines next phase of US war

FBI investigated former Capitol Police officer in Jan. 6 pipe bomb case, filings say

Illegal Alien Charged with Murdering 3-Month-Old Infant

Listen: Ketanji Brown Jackson Sparks Derision During Supreme Court Oral Arguments with Bizarre Tangent About Stealing Wallets

This Video Is Repulsive: White Wokester Says He’s Scared to Go Into Store Because Too Many White People Are Inside – His Last 7 Words Are Priceless

Poll Finds Majority of Americans View Democrats as an ‘Open Borders’ Party

Trump administration makes major move to relieve ‘unfair burden’ on DHS workers as shutdown drags on

WATCH: Robert De Niro brushes off ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ label hurled by critics

Fox News Poll: Broad anxiety about AI doesn’t extend to jobs

Trump’s address to the nation: Burning questions on Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and NATO

Mike Johnson panned for ‘caving’ to John Thune in potential DHS shutdown offramp

NATO Was Built for a World That No Longer Exists – It’s Time for America to Act Accordingly

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020