Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Don Lemon Claims People Are Begging Him to Run for President and He’s ‘Totally Serious’ About Doing It

Olive Garden’s Never-Ending Pasta Regulation Becomes Unlikely Election Integrity Rallying Point for Conservatives

Rubio’s call to combat global funders of far-left terrorism could put Singham in crosshairs

Darline Graham considering running for full a Senate term as memorial services set for Lindsey Graham: report

Appeals court sets September hearing over dismissal of James Comey and Letitia James cases

Watch: The Time Gingrich Nailed Turncoat Megyn Kelly’s Clinton vs Trump Hypocrisy – ‘I Dare You – Say “Bill Clinton Sexual Predator”‘

Israeli Knesset dissolves after overnight legislative blitz, elections set for October

MAGA Declares Fox News Has ‘Joined the Fake Media’ After ‘Strange’ Coverage of Trump’s Big Speech

Democrat scrambles to meet Angel Mom after she blasts lawmakers to their faces for ignoring families’ pleas

Socialist-backed Dem who ripped the wealthy cracks state’s top 1%, tax returns show

Tyler Robinson’s father runs thriving hometown business as taxpayers face possible $10M defense bill: report

‘Today’ show security guard fired after intruder enters unauthorized area, targets Craig Melvin: report

Trump Admin Notifies States ‘Whose Election Data Was Compromised’ by China

US Forces Pound Key Targets, Iranians Respond by Hitting Kuwait’s Water Supply, Firing Missiles at Qatar

State Department fires back after Walz doubles down on pardon of convicted child rapist

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020