Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Influencer’s body returns home after safari getaway as missing ring and fiancé questions cloud case: report

Melania Trump, Queen Camilla team up at White House youth event spotlighting US-UK bond

Body camera video shows police officer allegedly kidnapped by armed robbery suspect in roadside showdown

WATCH: Ilhan Omar roasted for brutal resurfaced video about ‘World War Eleven’

Trump Says Iran Just Alerted Him That They Are in ‘A State of Collapse’

Melania Trump and Queen Camilla tour technology-in-education event at the White House

FCC Takes ‘Unprecedented’ Action Against Disney in Response to Jimmy Kimmel’s Melania Trump Comment: Report

Emmer says MN fraud raids send ‘crystal clear’ message after feds hit dozens of sites

Breaking: FBI Raids ‘Quality Learning Center’ and 21 Other Locations in Somali Fraud Crackdown

Cuccinelli says Dems undercut own redistricting defense as Virginia justices press ‘Yes’ camp

OPEC Unexpectedly Loses a Member in Shock to Global Oil Market

Inside the hottest party in town as royal mania takes over Washington

Rep Cory Mills draws first Republican challenger as sexual misconduct allegations, expulsion threat mount

FBI raids Minneapolis childcare facilities, part of sweeping fraud investigation

Three college frats in crosshairs as hazing claims of booze, burns and hospital trips spark crackdown: school

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020