Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Extreme Climate Model Scenario Was Widely Used Despite Being Impossible

Controversial program paying drug users for used syringes becomes permanent in NYC

Education Department Moves To Crack Down On Schools, Teachers Unions Protecting Sexual Predators

ICE melting under Trump’s expectations, officers say

Olivia Rodrigo’s new album defies expectations, including her audience’s

Who is Nikki Floris? Ex-FBI official behind Trump’s ‘shadow government’ rhetoric during election address

WATCH: Josh Hawley issues blistering rebuke of McConnell over ‘obligation’ to country

Tulsi Gabbard’s brother charged after allegedly trying to lure children to Waikīkī hotel room: police

Andrew, Tristan Tate arrested in Miami as UK seeks extradition on expanded rape, trafficking charges

Mamdani doubles down on democratic socialism while insisting Wall Street, business leaders can work with him

Boston police investigate death at home owned by Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s husband

Bernie Sanders dismisses Haley Stevens, says Michigan race is against the ‘billionaire class’

Mamdani says NYC is exploring whether it can arrest Netanyahu if Israeli leader visits for UN General Assembly

Man who allegedly rode naked atop moving locomotive busted after bizarre train stunt: sheriff

Liberal circuit judge blasts SCOTUS conservatives, says Hawaii will defy high court

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020