Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

White House-backed GOP bill would revoke citizenship after Somali fraud scandal

Law Professor: Anti-ICE Governors Are Acting Like Anti-Civil Rights Segregationists

Google Rolls Back Disturbing Policy: They Emailed 13-Year-Olds Instructions on How to Remove Parental Controls

Trump asserts Ilhan Omar should be jailed or booted to Somalia

‘Protecting Child Rapists and Killers’: ICE Lists Off Illegals They’ve Caught as Liberal Protests Rage On

California gubernatorial hopefuls have a Gavin Newsom problem

Lindsey Graham meets with Mossad director during trip to Israel

Unearthed Data Makes Pennsylvania’s Puberty Blocker Payouts Look Even Sketchier

Trump’s ‘first resort’ use of military has succeeded but it has its limits

Rand Paul says US in ‘active war’ with Venezuela: ‘I still hope it works out for the best’

Viral video shows ICE agent telling agitators they’re disrupting arrest of child sex offender in Minnesota

ICE says 2 demonstrators were arrested in Minnesota for allegedly assaulting officers

Anti-ICE mob storms Minnesota church over pastor’s alleged ties to immigration enforcement

Nancy Pelosi faces social media backlash over behavior at Bob Weir tribute event

Newsom defies Trump administration, declares free parks for MLK Day

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020