Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

NYC Judge Frees Man Accused of Shooting Service Dog of Woman with Down Syndrome While Attempting to Kill Man

DOJ Arrests Honduran Man Accused of Taking Advantage of California’s Weak Election Laws

LGBTQ group reveals which Dem nominee is sponsoring Halloween event featuring drag shows

Woman accused of defacing WWII Memorial with spray paint indicted by federal grand jury

Woody Harrelson Formally Asks UK’s New Prime Minister to Probe COVID ‘Vaccine Injury’

Watch: Dems’ New ‘Anti-Zionism’ Is Really Anti-Semitism, And It Only Takes 30 Seconds for Biggest Game Streamer in the World to Explain It

Judge throws out Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s 9/11 confession in already long wait for trial

Trump vows ‘powerful appeal’ after another federal court rejects hush money case

Three sentenced for Feeding Our Future fraud at Minnesota meal sites

Reagan-era official warns ‘red-green alliance’ has shared goal of ‘destroying’ America

Antifa-linked sites go dark after State Department terror designation of tech collective

Jerry Sandusky granted new evidentiary hearing after accuser recants testimony

Jerry Sandusky Accuser to Recant Testimony in Court

Local Pennsylvania Official Accuses Gov. Shapiro of Major ‘Measles Deaths’ Deception

Newsom targets major affordability squeeze in ‘striking’ convergence with Trump

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020