Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Biden-era FBI took ‘minimal corrective action’ and defended staff after targeting Catholics

White House report card: Lake America won’t save Trump from drowning

ICE officer charged in Minneapolis shooting released in Texas after judge declines to intervene

Glenn Beck interview prompts Trump to allow farmers and ranchers to process their own food

U.S. Military Uses Lasers to Shoot Down Mexican Cartel Drones at Southern Border

The Psychology Behind Republicans Who Support Amnesty for Illegals

Soros-backed DA accused of going easy on illegal immigrants gets squeezed by House GOP

House Dem Debbie Dingell places Trump’s Lake Ontario name change in the crosshairs

Free climber stranded on Georgia rock face calls 911, prompting dramatic rescue by firefighter

Maine and Georgia could test whether ticket-splitting is making a comeback

Dems derided Trump’s midterm gamble — until he ended up winning big

Mail-voting crackdown moves ahead as Trump court win opens door to federal action

Brutal Cheap Shot: Video Captures Amazon Driver Sucker Punching Elderly Man Over Parking Dispute

Brexit isn’t what’s dragging Britain down

There’s little brilliant about Netflix’s ‘My Brilliant Career’

See also Dolly Parton dies at age 80

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020