Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Federal judge orders deported Venezuelans to be returned to US

Trump Rips Oklahoma’s ‘RINO’ Governor Over False Claim That Only Republicans Were Invited to Upcoming Dinner

GOP senator, Minnesota AG clash at Capitol Hill hearing: ‘Sit there and smirk, it’s sick’

Watch: Melania’s Perfect Reaction When a Kind Young Man With a Boatload of Guts Gently Hit on Her

Delcy Rodríguez considering visit to US after meeting with energy secretary

Senate Democrats weigh skipping Trump State of the Union address

Possible tattoo seen in Nancy Guthrie video may help ID subject, former profiler says

House Passes SAVE Act: Only One Democrat Voted for Proof of Citizenship in US Elections

Homan announces Operation Metro Surge to conclude in Minnesota

DEI, climate agenda advanced through progressive-backed lawsuits, new report claims

Nancy Mace Says She’s Seen Unredacted Epstein List, Which Shields ‘Prime Ministers’ and ‘Former Presidents’

Florida man suspected of killing 6 in shooting spree at 2 residences identified

GOP leaders want Trump to endorse Cornyn in Texas Senate primary amid fears of costly fight

House Republican Greg Steube introduces bill to nix controversial H-1B visa program

Minivan mom puts Dem incumbent on notice in top GOP target district: ‘She has done nothing for us’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020