Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment

Catholic JFK Laid Out How Presidents Should Deal With Papal Criticism in Famous 1960 Speech

School Agrees to Pay Up After Counselor Was Fired for Objecting to Transgender Policy

Woman added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list arrested hours later after tips poured in from Florida: Patel

Hunter Biden now living abroad as legal troubles mount, court filing reveals

DC curfew ends as teen takeover fears clock in – city braces for chaos amid spring break mayhem

Watch: As Walls Close in, Schiff’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him in Resurfaced Pardon Video He Wishes Didn’t Exist

What to know about the Freedom 250 UFC fight on the White House lawn

Left-Wing Mob, Violent Threats Force Erika Kirk to Miss TPUSA Event with JD Vance

Trump reveals he has multi-pick SCOTUS plan ready as retirement speculation heats up

WATCH: Ex-NATO chief draws red line as Trump fumes alliance abandoned US during Iran war

Jeanine Pirro accused of trying to ‘circumvent’ Jerome Powell investigation through unprompted Fed ‘tour’

Millions tap Trump tax cuts this filing season as refunds top $3,400

Trump-Tillis tiff deepens as president says he ‘quit,’ concedes Fed fight could doom new chair confirmation

Man with Joker-inspired rifle fires gun, runs into traffic near Trump golf course, deputies say

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020