Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Department of Education Officially Axes Biden’s ‘Illegal Title IX Rewrite’

Huckabee Announces Update on New US Embassy in Jerusalem Project

WATCH: NYPD bodycam captures tense standoff after Bank of America exec fatally stabbed in Times Square

Lindsay Clancy’s push to investigate holdout juror could be paused as defense, prosecutors agree to adjourn

Protester storms DC party, flips off crowd as ‘USA!’ chants erupt amid Trump’s AI push

Viewers Beg for Cancellation of MTV Video Music Awards After Chaos, Incompetence, and Gross Madonna Ruin Already Vile Awards Show

DOJ pleads with Supreme Court to save ban on transgender treatments in federal prisons

Homeless Man Arrested in Brutal Murder of a 63-Year-Old Woman in Central Park

Sweden’s left-wing coalition fails to form government, opening possibility for right wing to stay in charge

Reporter’s Notebook: Senate Republicans scrap early exit from Washington as midterm stakes soar

Blue city funds immigrant activist program with taxpayer dollars, critics say it ‘shuts citizens out’

AOC gives major hint about 2028 as Democrat civil war looms

Walz’s ‘exit interview’ reflecting on his tenure sparks lawmaker debate about his legacy: ‘Never serious’

Former Climate Reporter: My Industry Protected the Climate Change Narrative By Killing Positive News Stories

Degeneracy: School Protected Teacher Taking Sexual Pics of 10-Year-Olds Because He Is Gay and ‘Bats for the Other Team,’ Court Docs Say

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020