Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Reuters Goes Out of Its Way to Brand Male Trans Mass Shooter a Woman

Watch: The Moment Paul Rudd Schools Young Co-Stars on Jesus, the Fact That He’s Real, and How Rudd Wants to Meet Him

AG Pam Bondi announces ‘all’ Epstein files have been released, listing over 300 high-profile names

Hillary Clinton says migration ‘went too far’ and ‘needs to be fixed in a humane way’

Thousands rally in Munich against Iran regime before second round of nuclear talks

Rubio meets with Zelenskyy ahead of crucial Geneva talks as he says Trump wants solution that ‘ends bloodshed’

AOC’s Latest Word-Salad Answer on Taiwan Puts Even Kamala Harris to Shame

FAA Puts DEI in the Crosshairs, Threatens Any Airline That Doesn’t Hire By Merit

Over 190,000 ‘lethal’ doses of cocaine seized in Valentine’s Day week bust at southern border

‘Cheaters’: Trump Says Voter ID Will Be Required for Midterms Whether Congress Passes SAVE Act or Not

Retired FBI agent urges rapid DNA testing in Guthrie case: ‘You don’t wait for FedEx on Monday morning’

Alexei Navalny’s widow demands ‘accountability’ for Putin after European leaders say husband was poisoned

ICE ramps up deportation push by boosting capacity to 92,600 beds with $38.3B expansion

A $10 Walmart gun holster could help identify suspect in Nancy Guthrie case

Casey Wasserman to sell his talent agency after becoming ‘distraction’ due to Epstein files

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020