Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

DSA Democrats Praise This ‘Socialist Model’ – Communist Cuba’s Power Grid Collapses

Watch: MAGA Takes Victory Lap as CNN Is Forced to Read Trump’s WH Ban on Air

Newsom signs bills to prevent Trump from ‘dictatorial control’ over California elections

Trump announces new ‘AI Force,’ vows to protect industry as AI czar announcement nears

Who is Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan?

Riyadh airport explosion prompts Saudi Arabia to issue air raid alerts as Houthi fighting escalates

LA homelessness fraud cases expose deeper problem than stolen millions, oversight hawk warns

Netflix Won’t Be Faithfully Adapting the Last ‘Narnia’ Book Any Time Soon: The Islamic-Seeming Villains Stage a Religious Takeover – Sound Familiar?

Cuba’s power grid collapses as US embargo pressures regime

Soros Prosecutor Dropped His Gun Charges: 1 Year Later, He Was Charged with Murder

Doxxed Holdout Clancy Juror Moved to Undisclosed Location for His Safety After ‘Black Republican’ Faces Backlash

Data Centers Are About to Burn More US Natural Gas Than Almost Every Country on Earth

Congressman Tom Barrett: ‘Being a socialist should disqualify him for people’s consideration in my district’

Philly serial killer probe could expose larger network behind apparent ‘snuff’ films, expert says

Lawyer says 250-foot Trump arch disrupts historic sightlines cherished by veterans seeking burial at Arlington

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020