Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

People Magazine Smears Scott Adams as ‘Disgraced’ After Pro-Trump Dilbert Creator Dies of Cancer

Ladies of ‘The View’ Link Trump’s Immigration Enforcement to Bonkers Plot to ‘Cancel’ Midterms, Declare ‘Martial Law’

Somali fraudster convicted in Feeding Our Future scheme tied to recent recipient of Minnesota funding

DOJ says ‘no basis’ for civil rights investigation of Minneapolis ICE shooting

White House approves Nvidia chip sales to China despite bipartisan concerns in House

Democrats eye narrow path to capture Senate majority, but one wrong move could sink them

Kristi Noem faces impeachment effort in House as 70 Dems push obstruction of Congress charge

Venezuela Releases Imprisoned Americans in ‘Important Step in the Right Direction’

Trump eyes action on Greenland, setting up White House face-off with Denmark

Watch: ‘This Isn’t Seattle!’ – Cop Uses Painful Sternal Rub to Stop Non-Compliant Woman’s Fake Seizure and It’s Priceless

Tax fight puts California on collision course as billionaires leave for red states

Teachers union slams ‘Trump regime,’ claims ICE murdered Minneapolis agitator in message to supporters

Florida paraglider survives 500-foot plunge into ocean

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett Makes Troubling Concession to Transgender Activists During Oral Arguments

Trump administration projects united front as president weighs Iran options

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020