Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Suspect accused of killing Iryna Zarutska ‘incapable to proceed’ on his charge

Video: ‘In the Name of Allah’ – Man with Knife Arrested in Ohio for Threatening to Kill Father, Then Chasing His Unsuspecting Daughter

Charlotte light-rail murder suspect ruled incompetent to stand trial as history of crazed claims trails case

Top GOP hawk Graham warns Iran deal has ‘troubling aspects’ as ceasefire begins

JD Vance’s Task Force Uncovers $6 Billion in Potential Fraud, Begins Taking Action: Report

Trump admin scores Minnesota court win in Medicaid fraud crackdown

Shapiro tells Democrats to move past anti-Trump rhetoric at Al Sharpton’s confab

Ex-paramedic accused of drip-feeding wife to death—then faking his own kidnapping when heat turned up

Hungarian success in befriending American conservatives on display as Orban faces down possible defeat

Dem Senate nominee distances herself from Kamala Harris ahead of visit: ‘Will not be attending’

Rex Heuermann, suspected Gilgo Beach serial killer, pleads guilty to seven killings

California fraud concerns ramp up as man pleads guilty to massive scheme using taxpayers as his ‘piggy bank’

Who has been killed so far during the Iran war?

Eric Swalwell denies sexual harassment rumors as allegations mount

Husband of American woman missing in the Bahamas speaks out for first time, says he is ‘heartbroken’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020