Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

US and Israel launch ‘preemptive’ attack against Iran

BREAKING REPORT: Israel Strikes Iran, US Involved

Richard Cox derails sex offender case, once again

North Carolina woman arrested nearly 50 years after baby found dead in trash bag at landfill

Biden accuses Trump of erasing history and squandering US leadership role on global stage: ‘Dark days’

ICE blasts Washington mayor over directive restricting immigration enforcement

Trump floats Ted Cruz for Supreme Court, jokes he’d get ‘100%’ bipartisan vote to ‘get him out of there’

Dem Washington House majority leader apologizes for being ‘impaired’ during budget hearing

Man accused of spraying anti-ICE graffiti at Oklahoma Capitol is registered child sex offender; charges filed

Hegseth bans military from attending Princeton, Columbia, other elite universities: ‘Wokeness and weakness’

Trump picks up Whataburger for Air Force One and jokes about being poisoned after Texas speech

Luigi Mangione escapes federal death penalty after federal prosecutors decline to appeal judge’s ruling

Trump introduces Cornyn, Paxton but stays mum on endorsement in heated GOP primary

Illegal immigrant arrested after showing up to Florida Border Patrol office for contract IT work

Trump says he plans to order federal ban on Anthropic AI after company refuses Pentagon demands

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020