Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Apologies and cash headed to alleged ‘weaponization’ victims in billion-dollar Trump settlement

Breaking: Jury Sides Against Musk in OpenAI Lawsuit

Dem who welcomed socialist mayor’s ‘change’ now sounding alarm over billionaire exodus: ‘Gravely concerned’

Video: AOC Wheels Out Political Prop We’ve Never Seen Before – A Bulletproof Barrier, But There’s a Giant Problem

Democrat Max Morley Drops Out of Primary After Admitting to Mail Theft

Trump moves to drop $10 billion IRS lawsuit as DOJ weighs weaponization victims fund

Swing-seat Republican sidelined by ‘serious’ illness misses 88 votes as majority hangs by thread

Jackson protests as Supreme Court uses Louisiana gerrymandering ruling to instruct lower courts

Septic Truck Explodes After Being Struck By Train, Video Shows

Luigi Mangione update: Suspected murder weapon admissible at trial in state case, other evidence suppressed

11 National Park Service workers evacuated by helicopter amid California fire

White House plans to build helipad on the South Lawn

What’s at stake in the Thomas Massie primary

How Chinese EVs Coming from Canada May Impact US National Security

Scandal-Ridden Hospital to Open First US ‘Detransition’ Clinic in Historic Legal Settlement

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020