Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dead voter allegation fuels concerns about voting safeguards as blue state official turns herself in

WATCH: America’s first ‘formerly undocumented’ congressman delivers ultimatum at besieged ICE facility

‘Your Time Has Passed’: Democrats Furious After Jill and Hunter Biden Burst Back Into Spotlight

White House Launches Aliens.Gov After Series of Cryptic Messages: ‘They Walk Among Us’

Amtrak fire near Penn Station triggers major NYC commuter disruptions, NJ Transit and LIRR cancellations

‘Ghosts’ on Florida highways: Roadside sting snares 249 illegal immigrants, officers warn many more hiding

Blistering report exposes how national K-12 group’s DEI agenda is trickling down to local schools

Democrats ‘selling their soul’ to embrace Platner are in for rude awakening with Maine voters: GOP lawmaker

Can congressional Democrats co-opt MAHA from the MAGA-verse?

Democrats lash out at Bidens as former first lady relitigates the past: ‘They suck’

With tough midterm elections looming, Trump 2028 GOP revenge list grows

12-year-old boy dies after raft capsizes during school trip in Pennsylvania

BREAKING VIDEO: Blue Origin Rocket Suffers Massive Explosion After Catastrophic Failure at Cape Canaveral

RNC and NRCC file lawsuit defending Missouri’s new congressional map against Democratic challenges

Trump administration cracks down on Brazil’s biggest drug gangs with ‘global terror’ designation

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020