Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Scott Peterson’s longtime lawyer claims ‘new’ evidence could force courts to revisit his murder conviction

Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened

Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms

NYPD commissioner ‘proudly’ leads Israel parade as grand marshal; Mamdani breaks tradition, avoids event

NASA Reveals Moon Base Plan With Construction Process Beginning as Early as 2029

Trump warns judge against sacrificing national security by blocking White House ballroom, drone base

The Civil War Never Really Ended, But an American Union Could Finally Help America Truly Heal

Why NATO’s defense spending imbalance lasted for decades

Trump expands Turkey ambassador’s diplomatic role, adding Iraq, Syria amid Middle East tensions

Does China Have The Upper Hand?

NHL Legend Hangs Himself: Report

Graham Platner’s wife campaign video statement responding to infidelity allegations widely panned by critics

Platner controversies fuel speculation about little-known Maine ballot replacement provision

Agitators outside Delaney Hall set up organized logistics operation before Newark protests began

Leftists Host Striptease Fundraiser to Support Antifa Terrorists Behind Shooting at ICE Detention Facility in 2025

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020