Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Karen Bass appears to liken Spencer Pratt to Trump amid tightening LA mayoral race

Hasan Piker defends pro-communist, anti-ICE Singham network activists as ‘wonderful people’

California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus

Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter

Trump floats replacing 250th anniversary concert with massive MAGA rally after artists pull out

Senate candidate Graham Platner sent explicit texts to multiple women while married, wife says: report

Delaney Hall protests intensify as far-left activists, ICE supporters converge in New Jersey

Gov. Sherrill blames ICE, defends rioters after deploying troopers to quell violent mob

What The Left’s Colorado Climate Lawsuit Is Really All About

New Yorker Sentenced To 40 Years in Prison After Slaying 4 People on a Midnight Rampage

CBS News’ Bari Weiss Fired A ’60 Minutes’ Producer Citing ‘New Approach’

Who Was in Charge? Dems Owe Answers After Jill Biden Says She Thought Joe Was ‘Having a Stroke’ During Debate

Why Does the Media Care That Has-Beens Are Withdrawing From ‘Freedom 250’ DC Event?

Watch: Mysterious Strangers Pile Out of Sewer Manhole, Prompts Police Investigation

WATCH: Disgraceful UK Police Chief Apologizes for Letting Student Bleed Out Because He Was Accused of Being a Racist

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020