Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Latin Kings Gang Member Stole FBI Weapons During Left-Wing Anti-ICE Riot in Minneapolis

Philadelphia’s threat to prosecute ICE could trigger landmark court fight over authority, experts warn

White House torches Newsom as ‘inauthentic slimeball’ after California governor walks back ICE rhetoric

Family Member of Alleged Charlie Kirk Assassin’s Trans Lover Speaks Out

MAHA emerges as GOP 2026 election bright spot — with one major caveat

Shapiro’s White House trip to talk electricity prices could help him in 2026 and 2028

Virginia Democrats move to seize redistricting power, opening door to 4 new left-leaning seats

Crypto industry spent tens of millions influencing now-delayed cryptocurrency regulations

Federal judge restricts ICE agents amid ongoing Minneapolis area protests

IRS confirms Trump-ordered $1,776 ‘Warrior Dividend’ for 1.45M troops is tax-free

Michael Cohen says NY prosecutors ‘pressured and coerced’ him into anti-Trump testimony

911 transcripts, documents detail chaotic scene after ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good

Florida GOP candidate wants 50% ‘sin tax’ on OnlyFans creators to fight ‘cultural degeneracy’

California man arrested for allegedly making online death threats against JD Vance during Disneyland visit

Illegal alien with 24 convictions among ‘worst of the worst’ arrested in Minnesota ICE operation: DHS

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020