Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Former ESPN and NBC Sideline Reporter Michele Tafoya Triumphs in GOP Senate Primary

Breaking: Inflation Rate Drops, Defying Economist Projections

Blakeman cuts into Hochul’s New York governor’s race lead in new poll, as likely voters give DSA judgment

Spanberger’s rough rural reception draws Hillary Clinton parallels

‘No better group’: Veteran says special ops should get same concealed carry permit as retired cops

Ex-New Jersey mayor, her husband charged for using fake ballot signatures after she pleaded guilty to DUI

Kansas Democratic governor nominee suggested Jesus could have been transgender

Heroic Florida K-9 returns to sheriff’s office days after being shot protecting 3 deputies, losing leg

STATE OF PLAY: Highly watched Hong race remains too close to call as progressives notch key primary wins

Five teen friends killed after vehicle plunges down Colorado cliff, leaving community shattered

Ilhan Omar on track for fifth term as Minnesota voters maintain far-left streak

Schumer dealt another blow as progressive insurgency scores win in key Senate battle

Trump-backed Mike Lindell falls to Lisa Demuth in Minnesota governor primary

Minnesota House speaker Lisa Demuth wins GOP gubernatorial primary to replace Tim Walz in November

4-year-old dies after suffering electrical shock from clothes dryer inside Kansas home

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020