Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

FBI launches ‘fittest agent’ competition for field offices

Warren torched over ‘my kind of man’ praise for Platner after death-wish post for wounded veteran resurfaces

Trump administration orders green card applicants to leave the US, apply from their home countries

Breaking: Tulsi Gabbard Resigning from Trump Administration

Wasserman Schultz makes bid for new district after Cherfilus-McCormick resignation

Dale Earnhardt Jr. Explains How He and Kyle Busch Overcame Their ‘Challenging Existence’ in Heartfelt Message

Dem candidate who called for imprisoning ‘Zionists’ blames her own party, media for backlash

As China tensions loom, US temporarily pauses Taiwan weapons sales due to Iran war, acting Navy secretary says

Trump Celebrates ‘Total Jerk’ Colbert’s Official Cancellation, Shares Brutal Farewell Message: ‘He’s Finally Gone!’

COVID-Era CDC Director Claims Ebola Outbreak Could Become ‘Significant Pandemic’

Minnesota fraud suspect who jumped from building is arrested, FBI says

Trump not scheduled to attend Donald Jr.’s wedding in Bahamas

Militant Antifa Leftist Indicted for Allegedly Trying to Torch GOP Headquarters

85-year-old ‘hero’ stops man posing as utility worker trying to kidnap woman, authorities say

A Better Way for Christians to Engage Politics and Culture

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020