Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme

New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state

Missing 1200-pound giraffe Gracie found 2 weeks after wandering away from ranch in viral search

Texas Board of Education approves required reading list with Bible passages for 5 million students

Mamdani’s Socialist Dream is Becoming a Reality as NYC Freezes 1 Million Rents

Warren tells Trump to ‘sign the damn bill’ as bipartisan housing package remains stalled in Washington

‘Baked to death’: Homan rips media while sharing horrific scenes from border enforcement career

GOP is Launching Election Integrity Project with Page from Soros Playbook

Bill Barr calls on Senate GOP to confirm Todd Blanche for attorney general

New limited-edition US passport features Trump’s image and a warning

Judge Shuts Down Tyler Robinson’s Attempt to Dodge Death Penalty

Trump Says Iran Just Committed ‘a Foolish Violation of Our Ceasefire Agreement’

Just Years After Strict Mask Mandates, Minneapolis Lifts Ban on AIDS Superspreader Establishments During Gay ‘Pride’ Month

House Democrat lashes out when grilled on whether socialist victories would threaten Dem unity

Trump admin cracks down on estimated $10 billion in Obamacare fraud, boots millions from rolls

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020