Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Cops arrest 14-year-old accused of gunning down business school graduate on way to ballgame

Breaking: New Hiring Twice as High as Economists Expected in Gangbusters Jobs Report

2 States Aren’t Just Defying ‘Pride Month,’ They’re Replacing Pagan Celebration With ‘Nuclear Family Month’

The Octagon on the South Lawn: Trump’s UFC Freedom 250 White House extravaganza

Democrat bankrolling Graham Platner’s campaign ripped for downplaying abuse allegations and more top headlines

Republicans face ticking midterm clock as Iran fallout keeps pressure on gas prices

Trump’s personal legal team aims to clear hush money conviction

Dem senator bankrolling Platner’s campaign ripped for downplaying abuse allegations in bombshell report

The key strategy red states are using to lower housing costs revealed

Senate push to reauthorize nation’s spy powers stumbles over controversial Trump decision

Handcuffed suspect allegedly slips restraints, steals Dallas police cruiser with officer trapped in back seat

Overcrowded migrant vessel with 240 people on board intercepted near Turks and Caicos

Rubio sanctions Cuban groups with ties to US nonprofit network funded by communist donor Neville Roy Singham

New Jersey man accused of killing wife with barbell allegedly confessed in messages to relatives: report

Trump announces ‘rally to end all rallies’ in DC to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020