Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump indicates support for Christian-backed plan to help Canadian Jews escape antisemitism

Massive AI boom puts one of America’s oldest manufacturers on path to double in size, CEO says

Record High Americans Smoke Marijuana While Record Low Smoke Cigarettes

When DEI Becomes DIE: The Tragic Case Of Jason Arday

Huckleberry Finn And the New York Times’ Censor’s Logic

Hegseth Responds to Rumored 2028 Presidential Run

Colorado city leader dies after collapsing on mountain hike: ‘Loss for our city’

Death toll rises to 38 after Russian strike on Ukrainian warehouse

Republicans tighten screws on Sherrill as noncitizen voter probe enters new phase

Dem Senate hopeful pivots on data centers as rising power costs collide with campaign

Study Links Gender Ideology And Support For Political Violence

Social media influencer pleads guilty after prank videos at Arizona Chipotle, other businesses

Turns Out AI Wrote Billionaire’s Widely-Cited Anti-Scott Bessent Op-Ed

Silicon Valley exec ignites firestorm after accusing JD Vance of bringing DEI back

West Virginia looks to AI data center boom to help eliminate state income tax

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020