Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Two 14-year-olds flee MTA officers, remain missing after vanishing from New Jersey train station

Judge rules Dan Sullivan can appear on Alaska primary ballot against Sen. Dan Sullivan

Jeffries welcomes Democratic Socialists into the fold as critics warn party is revealing ‘exactly who it is’

Polygamous sect leader convicted of abuse charges after girls found in trailer on Arizona highway

Hezbollah rejects Israel and Lebanon’s peace framework: ‘Null and void’

Trump unloads on ‘lunatic’ John Bolton after ex-aide pleads guilty in classified docs case

Man who set Virginia council member on fire over alleged affair gets 40-year sentence

Carville calls for formal ‘schism’ with socialist candidates: ‘Can’t be in the same party’

Bill Maher presses Vance over Trump’s election fraud claims: ‘That s*** has to stop’

Former House intel leader points to Dem rhetoric ‘encouraging’ violence as 8th man charged in UFC terror plot

Hollywood Libs Pour Love on Beijing, Tout China as ‘First Petro-Zero Economy,’ But Facts Show Different Story

Global Elitism at Work: Amid Heatwave, European Commission Shuts Off AC – But Only For Lower-Level Workers

Bill Barr says Todd Blanche isn’t ‘a toady,’ urges senate to confirm Trump’s AG pick

Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing

US search and rescue teams deploy to help Venezuela earthquake response

See also Alan Greenspan dies at age 100

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020