Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Outgoing Cracker Barrel CEO to Receive Millions in Severance Pay

Conservatives Clash Over Caitlin Clark’s Response to Question About Trans Athletes

Democratic socialist Francesca Hong has former child star, OnlyFans model in senior campaign role: report

Airbnb’s $750,000 to Karen Bass fuels pay-to-play claims over LA rental policy

Schumer said ‘Democrats support voter ID’ — then every Senate Democrat voted against GOP bill

Schumer caves, hands Republicans shutdown win after months of uncertainty

SEE IT: Dem senators rally behind El-Sayed but duck questions on progressive agenda

Two men accused of posing as federal agents arrested after allegedly targeting 85-year-old in $200K gold scam

Senate GOP punts party-line budget fight until after August recess

Trump urges Jeanine Pirro to revisit dropped Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case

More than 50 bodies found decomposing inside Chicago funeral home after neighbors complained of ‘stench’

Fed-Up NYC Homeowners Take to Court to Fight Back Against Mamdani’s New Tax ‘Debacle’

Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has security clearance revoked over Air Force One disclosure

Trump-Backed Rep. Andy Ogles Loses Primary After Green Energy Group Spent Big to Unseat Him

Chilling new video shows armed citizens, off-duty trooper confront In-N-Out gunman during deadly rampage

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020