Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Parents Who Starved Their 75-Day-Old Baby to Death Will Get No Jail Time After Guilty Plea – Guess Who the Judge Is

Fauci’s Fifth fuels vow to haul him into court ‘every day’ despite Biden pardon

‘Like Graham Platner But Worse’: GOP Group Vows $42M Campaign Against Last-Minute Replacement Democrat

Bipartisan pair of senators urge Rubio to release aid to African women, children at risk of Ebola

Florida mail carrier accused of snatching pets on route, trapping 100-plus cats and dogs in ‘hoarding’ house

Savannah Guthrie makes desperate plea six months after mom Nancy went missing: ‘Someone knows something’

Unearthed posts show Heartland Dem candidate rallying in favor of child gender surgery: ‘Radical as it gets’

Democratic Socialists awarded $5.2M in inheritance dispute despite family’s objections

Five Police Officers Arrested and Fired After Abusing Flock Surveillance Cameras

Patient debt adds stress to already tenuous US economy

Fauci repeatedly pressed Pence and Trump aides for more TV appearances as fame exploded, diary shows

Anti-Trump ‘Jeopardy!’ Host Kicks Hornets’ Nest, Triggers Trans Activists with Sarcasm

In Pelosi’s district, a battle over the future of San Francisco Democrats emerges

WATCH: Booker continues to reject SAVE Act despite bombshell NJ voter roll scandal

WATCH: Democrats admit when they’d eliminate the filibuster as SAVE Act fight heats up

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020