Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Psaki Hurries to Walk Back Calling Trump a ‘Predator’ on Live TV

Leading Senate Democrat tells Fox News ‘it’s time … for new leadership,’ as Schumer faces growing pressure

Meet the socialist Mamdani-style mayor just elected to run West Coast’s 5th largest city

Charlotte braces for federal immigration enforcement as murder rate rises 200% in uptown area

Mosaic Discovered at World’s Oldest Christian Worship Site Speaks of Divinity of Jesus

St Louis neighborhoods struggling to rebuild six months after tornado kills five

Newsom’s fight to stay relevant ahead of 2028 may be his toughest test yet

Mountains of paper to climb: House faces heavy backlog in bills thanks to shutdown

“Patriot Weekend” and counter protests of inflatable animals at ICE facility in Portland

Funniest Moments Between Trump and RFK Jr – President Has Quite a Sense of Humor

Michigan adopts sex education standards recommending students be taught gender identity, sexual orientation

Trump drops Marjorie Taylor Greene endorsement, calls her a ‘ranting lunatic,’ hints at backing primary rival

Charlotte promises to resist pending federal immigration raids: ‘Campaign of terror’

Zohran Mamdani tells 1M social media followers to boycott Starbucks amid ongoing worker strike

Antifa members indicted in Texas ICE facility riot, attempted murder of officer

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020