Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fellow Democrats Are Now Calling Out Eric Swalwell Over ‘Very Troubling’ Accusations

Michael Moore Defends Iran, Slams US for Bombing Japan in WWII in Deranged Rant: ‘We’re the Bad Guys!’

Senate Dem accuses Trump of being ‘unfit for office,’ joins growing call to impeach, oust president

Unearthed clip exposes shocking claim by Newsom’s wife about inmates at violent California prison

US denies Vatican feud, claims cardinal called report of animosity ‘fabrications’

Spanberger breaks silence on ‘sanctuary’ claims as ICE clashes heat up

Artemis II pilot Victor Glover’s daughter steals spotlight in viral tribute: ‘First daughter of the moon’

Yale Athletics Scandal: Admin Allegedly Forced Official to Retire to Make Room for Top Hire’s Lesbian Lover

Misconduct allegations dog Swalwell as Dem rivals seize opening in California governor’s race

Florida woman who posed as nurse and treated more than 4,400 patients without a license avoids jail time

Watch: Gov’t Exposed Spending £150k to Help 2 Foreign Child Molesters Fight Their Rap – We’re Committing Cultural Suicide

Democrats reject measure targeting dark money and AIPAC at spring meeting

Mamdani ripped after conceding key campaign pledge won’t happen this year

American Husband Arrested Days After His Wife Went Missing in the Bahamas

Netanyahu confirms negotiations with Lebanon after deadliest day of Israeli strikes

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020