Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

GOP Sen. Cassidy breaks with Trump over deadly shooting by Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis

Video Appears to Show Man Shot By ICE Assault Woman, Instigate Violence, Resist Arrest

DHS says illegal immigrant accused of throwing rock at New Jersey school bus, injuring young girl

Gun rights groups clash after man DHS says was armed fatally shot by CBP in Minneapolis

Anti-ICE Rioters Barricading Entire Blocks in Minneapolis, Police Appear MIA

Rep Maxwell Frost allegedly assaulted at Sundance Film Festival in racially-charged incident

Frey, Klobuchar call for ICE to leave Minneapolis following deadly CBP shooting in city

Noem says Minneapolis suspect committed ‘domestic terrorism,’ accuses Walz, Frey of inciting violence

Trump Resurrects Reagan-Era Pro-Life Policy, Punishes and Defunds Foreign Abortion Operations, Gender Madness

Senate Dems revolt against DHS funding bill amid Minneapolis chaos, hiking government shutdown risk

Trump to skip Super Bowl in California, criticizes performers Bad Bunny and Green Day

Alex Pretti, 37, identified as man fatally shot by Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis

Anti-ICE agitator allegedly bites off federal officer’s finger during Minneapolis attack

‘Loyal soldier’: A day on the trail with JD Vance, Trump’s ‘human Swiss Army Knife’

READ IT: Bondi sends letter to Gov Walz warning Minnesota’s immigration policies endanger agents

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020