Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Democrats’ last-minute move to block GOP funding plan sends lawmakers home early

Judge tosses Trump-linked lawsuit targeting Chief Justice Roberts, dealing setback to Trump allies

Extremely Strange 25-Year-Old Connection Uncovered Between Dead Brown Shooting Suspect from Portugal and Murdered MIT Professor for Portugal

Sports reporter’s 3-year-old opened door for grandpa who then found couple dead in home: report

Suspect in Brown shooting, MIT murder found dead and more top headlines

Video: Brown Univ. President Drops Astonishing Claim on Missing Cameras That Absolutely No One Believes

Noem announces pause on immigrant visa lottery that allowed alleged Brown shooter to enter US

These members of Congress will leave their jobs (mostly) voluntarily

Rubio unloads on ‘alarmists,’ touts State Dept disaster response after USAID closure

The three front-runners for Trump’s Fed chair pick: What to know

US lawmakers navigate a fraught dispute between Ireland and Israel

Rob Reiner, 1947–2025

North Carolina’s longest-serving governor dies at 88 after serving 4 terms in office

Milwaukee County judge found guilty of obstructing federal immigration agents in courthouse incident

BREAKING: Deceased Brown Shooting Suspect ID’d as 48-Year-Old Portuguese National, Student at Brown

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020