Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Dem senator warns deportation could let Virginia woman’s illegal immigrant killer ‘escape accountability’

Trump claims donor funded White House ballroom includes hidden build below with security focus

Trump dominates CPAC poll as conservatives rally behind agenda, back Iran action

CNN Host Point Blank Asks Hakeem Jeffries If Shutdown Is Purely A Negotiating Tactic

Jaguar Makes Major Marketing Pivot After Woke Ad Disaster

Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country

Passenger bomb threat triggers police response and evacuation on Frontier flight under investigation

DHS criticizes plea deal that could free migrant after guilty plea in teen assault case

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what to expect on DHS funding when the Senate meets Monday

Bank of America to Pay $72.5M Settlement Over Epstein Lawsuit

Huckabee says Israeli police blocking Palm Sunday service is an ‘overreach’

Vacation rental near Yosemite allegedly used to secretly record guests, 4,000 illegal files found

Tiger Woods’ Friends Admit He ‘Drives Like a Bat Out of Hell Very Often’

How This Archaeological Find Shows the Ancient Link Between Israel and Persia

Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020