Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Replacement GOP nominee named after Rep Chuck Edwards drops re-election bid

US Marine veteran released from Russian prison after 1,666 days of detention

Michigan rescuers find family stranded for 3 days after tubing trip in dramatic video

Watch: Longtime Clinton Advisor Blasts Today’s Dems as Group of Lunatics, Who Are ‘Basically Illiterate and Uninformed’ from Watching MSNOW

NYC Homeowners Score Temporary Court Victory Over Mamdani’s New Tax

Alex Murdaugh lawyers allege ‘fabricated’ evidence was used to secure murder indictments

Trump-backed Darline Graham Nordone faces test in unpredictable South Carolina primary

Inside the Senate’s chaotic all-nighter that left Trump’s SAVE America Act on the shelf

Pentagon races to buy 10X more missiles as Iran war dwindles arsenal, threatens readiness for China aggression

GOP senators rally behind 9/11 families in push to ban Mamdani from anniversary ceremony: ‘He’s a disgrace’

The Medicare-for-all trade-offs socialists aren’t talking about, according to experts

One year later, some DC residents praise Trump’s National Guard deployment

Deported child predator who illegally reentered US sentenced to 20 years in federal prison

Florida woman accused of faking cancer to scam hundreds out of $40K, police say

Trump used catering truck, Air Force One decoy to evade Iran threat: report

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020