Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Trump returns to National Prayer Breakfast as faith takes center stage in second term

Republican who said Sen Cassidy ‘sucks,’ gets Trump endorsement after ditching Senate bid for House run

Teachers union leaders spent thousands at swanky resorts

Bodycam shows NYPD officer shooting man with knife as Mamdani calls for no criminal charges

Georgia GOP Rep Barry Loudermilk to retire, adding to wave of House exits

More than 200 people evaluated in Tennessee after carbon monoxide leak infiltrates university facility

FBI arrests 55 in massive drug ring with alleged China supplier flooding US streets with fentanyl

Hochul primary challenger picks democratic socialist, once arrested for harassment, as running mate

DC Democrats Turn Their Backs on the Clintons: ‘They Bring Nothing But Baggage’

Massive student immigration protest turns violent in downtown LA; dispersal order issued: police

Government lawyer who told judge ‘this job sucks’ sent back to DHS

Democrats say Clintons’ agreement to testify undercuts subpoena push, won’t bring new Epstein answers

Baltimore’s progressive mayor calls reporter ‘racist’ in heated exchange over luxury taxpayer vehicle

Joseph Gordon-Levitt slams Big Tech for sextortion, threats to children while calling for key internet reform

New York subway hearing erupts as MTA boss snaps ‘shut up’ amid grilling over guards letting fare jumpers walk

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020