Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Mamdani Turns Into Kamala Harris on ‘The View’ – Responds With Gibberish to Question on Aides’ Rabid Anti-White Racism

Mexico flies 37 cartel members to US under pressure from Trump admin

Ex-NFL reporter launches GOP Senate bid, reveals how she will flip script on state’s ‘crisis of leadership’

What will Trump’s Greenland obsession mean for the future of NATO?

Davos braces for Trump as even he admits: ‘I have no idea what’s going to happen’

Crime, guns, and taxes: Democrats seek to reshape Virginia moments after taking power

Georgia teen arrested after father turns him in following pair of shootings, police say

Cause of death revealed weeks after woman died following Universal Orlando ride: report

Gov Whitmer says America ‘ready for a woman president,’ contrasting Michelle Obama

Air Force One turns around shortly after takeoff for Trump’s trip to Switzerland

Lindsey Halligan leaves US attorney post after weeks of judicial scrutiny

Former Trump lawyer accuses federal judge of making ‘baseless accusations of lying’ after departure

Missouri couple accused of locking teens in chicken pen, shooting them with BB guns in abuse case

House passes AI education bill for small businesses in landslide 395-14 vote

Cities Church Issues Full-Throated Response to Invasion of their Sunday Worship Service by Leftist Agitators

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020