Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Man Arrested After Attack on School Bus Seriously Injures 8-Year-Old Girl

Iran’s crown prince calls for renewed nationwide protests despite killings: ‘This is a war’

Brooks Koepka Returns to PGA Tour, Opening the Door for Other LIV Stars – But There’s an $85 Million Catch

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump declares himself Venezuela’s ‘acting president’

Trump announces ‘final’ 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran regime

Former Navy SEAL convicted for trying to harm police with explosives during California ‘No Kings’ protests

Celebrities Wear Anti-ICE Pins at Golden Globes in Tribute to Renee Good

House Democrats ask judge to block Noem’s revived ICE visit rule, say DHS defied court order

Conservative legal group targets CFPB rule mandating race, sex data in home loans

Trump Says the Military ‘Is Looking at Some Strong Options’ on Iran

DOJ charges illegal immigrant with Tren de Aragua ties after Border Patrol shooting in Portland

Riley Gaines says her show’s rebrand will ‘broaden’ its scope of discussions

Powell reveals what it would take to step down from the Fed as pressure mounts

Trump pledges to uncover leftist groups countering ICE

Minneapolis Police Finally Do Their Jobs: 30 ICE Protesters Detained Already

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020