Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Video: Toyota Chairman Goes Hard Core MAGA With Trump-Vance Photos on His Shirt and a Classic Red MAGA Cap

Dem Senator Fires Staffer Accused of Helping a Four-Time Deported Illegal Escape Custody

Chicago repeat offender accused of punching women arrested again after years of violent crimes: report

Mamdani keeps Jessica Tisch as NYPD commissioner

House Republican chairman refers Jack Smith’s former deputy to DOJ for prosecution

Sanctuary states need crackdown as Americans pay price for illegal immigrant truckers: GOP lawmaker

Watch: James Comer Exposes Hakeem Jeffries’ Connection to Epstein on House Floor

Joy Reid Admits the Truth: She’d ‘Freak Out’ if She ‘Saw a Penis’ in the Women’s Locker Room

Redistricting setbacks in court slow GOP map push ahead of 2026

Texas investigating USTA for possible violation of law banning biological males in women’s sports

Federal judge rules law requiring display of Ten Commandments in Texas classrooms unconstitutional

Zelensky under heavy pressure to fire Ukrainian ‘co-president’ Andriy Yermak after corruption scandal

House Dem slammed for ‘sick’ defense of colleague caught texting Epstein during 2019 hearing

DHS launching massive immigration operation in Louisiana, Mississippi: ‘Swamp Sweep’

Anti-Islam protesters, Muslims clash in Dearborn, Michigan, after man attempts to burn Quran

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020