Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Vance en route to Pakistan for high-stakes Iran talks as ‘fragile’ ceasefire teeters

Late Breaking: Dem Leader Jeffries Calls on Swalwell to Drop Out of California Gov Race After Sex Abuse Allegations, Doesn’t Demand Resignation from House

Unusually High Number of Chinese Navy Ships Hit Seas as US Remains Laser Focused on Iran

Epstein survivors push back on Melania Trump hearing call as Comer vows ‘we will have hearings’

Breaking: NASA, Navy Personnel Rush to Recover Artemis II Astronauts After Pacific Ocean Landing

Sen Tim Sheehy makes emergency landing after in-flight engine failure

Pelosi, California Dems slam Swalwell over bombshell sexual assault allegations: ‘Indefensible’

Washington Post Journalist Pleads Guilty in Child Porn Case

Soviet-Era Groups Work to Win American Hearts for Another Communist Regime

Swalwell’s former female staffer drops bombshell allegations of sexual assault, exposing himself: report

Voters Oust Half of Missouri City Council for Greenlighting $6,000,000,000 AI Data Center

Trump’s birthright citizenship crusade draws backing from cohort of prominent legal scholars

Planned Parenthood Lost More Money Than It Made as Taxpayer Funding, Abortions Increased

Wes Moore preemptively unloads on Baltimore Sun ahead of expose, as spox beefs with ‘right wing’ ownership

Ex-staffer claims Swalwell sexually assaulted her. He denies allegations

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020