Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Ax-wielding suspect subdued by teen military recruit’s MMA takedown in car wash clash caught on video

‘Unprecedented’ agreement releases emergency oil reserves as gas prices spark concerns

House Oversight Committee demands depositions from Bondi and Lutnick in Epstein probe

Dem lawmaker disputes police bodycam amid reports he said he was above the law: ‘On top’ or ‘on time’

Bipartisan housing push advances, but Trump-backed investor ban faces resistance

Trump administration puts key Biden-era immigration policy on notice: ‘Unsustainable cycle’

The ‘Worst Mayor in America’ Is Attempting a Political Comeback — With a New Party

Kamala Harris Cancels Multiple Book Tour Stops Amid Controversy

Unusual Calls Made from NYC Terror Suspect’s Home Hours After Arrest Raise Questions: Report

Uh-Oh: Video Captures Schumer Finally Admitting It – He Hates the SAVE America Act Because It Cleans Voter Rolls in Every State

Hillary Clinton caught on video stepping back after pushy former president nudges her at busy NYC intersection

Shipping disruptions spread beyond oil: Helium, sulfur, and semiconductors

3 brothers of Iraqi descent arrested in Oslo for allegedly ‘terror bombing’ of US Embassy

Republican Sen. John Cornyn Calls on GOP to Change Filibuster and Pass SAVE Act as He Prepares for Primary Runoff Against Ken Paxton

Minnesota human services officials skip fraud hearing as Walz promises reform

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020