Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Concertgoer dies after apparent fall from upper level at Madison Square Garden

‘The Era of Deportations Has Begun’: European Parliament Passes Toughest Immigration Policy in Decades

Multiple hikers dead amid scorching Grand Canyon temperatures

Mark Levin blasts Trump administration over Israel: ‘Stop trashing, smearing, bullying’ ally

Trump’s Iran gamble divides GOP hawks and ‘America First’ conservatives over what victory looks like

College sports sees pivotal moment as Senate looks to move legislation on NIL, transfers across goal line

New Report Says Major School System Hid Admissions Data Defying Supreme Court

Perverted: Meal Kit Company Runs Gross Pride Month Ad, Offering Recipes to Aid Vile Sex Act

Trump’s DOJ Just Did What Decades of Speeches Never Could

FAA investigates after incoming plane executes go-around due to aircraft leaving from intersecting runway

Responders put out explosive blaze at fireworks stand in Oklahoma

Obama Center visitors say project symbolic of ‘Black excellence,’ claim scandal-free legacy while Trump ripped

Trump administration probe could upend widely used transgender youth treatment guidelines

Chinese AI models raise ‘sleeper agent’ fears after report finds more vulnerable code for US users

Angel Dads face another Father’s Day without children killed by illegal immigrants: ‘She should be graduating’

See also Trump arrives for UFC fight

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020