Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Texas Democratic Senate candidates sidestep Islamic terrorism concerns following deadly Austin attack

US Embassy struck by drones in Saudi Arabia as Americans instructed to shelter in place

UN nuclear watchdog says Iran nuclear site damaged in strikes

Rock Band Radiohead Lashes Out with Vulgar Response After ICE Uses Song to Honor Americans Killed by Illegals

Favor Returned: Israel Takes Out Iran’s Khamenei as Jews Mark 2,500 Years Since Being Saved by Persian King

Justice Department’s new policy saves $1.6 million in taxpayer dollars previously spent on transgender procedures

Supreme Court blocks California ban on notifying students’ parents about gender transitions

Cornyn wants to work with Trump to fix ‘broken’ immigration system if reelected

BREAKING: US Embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Hit by Multiple Iranian Drones

Markets Handle Iran Strikes Brilliantly as S&P 500 Has Biggest Intraday Recovery in 5 Months Finishing Positive for the Day

Trump sends official notification to Congress on strikes against Iran

Virginia Mom Allegedly Murdered by Illegal Alien with 30 Priors Only Weeks After Dem Governor Blocks ICE Cooperation

Department of Education Honors Charlie Kirk with Banner as Part of America’s 250th Birthday Celebration: ‘Heroes in American Education’

Watch: Responding to an ABC Reporter, Trump Just Issued the Coolest Wartime Quote in Presidential History – It’ll Never Be Topped

Iran Update: Trump Says Attack Is Moving Much Faster Than Expected With 1,200 Targets Hit and the Entire Iranian Navy Neutralized

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020