Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Authors of new Trump book reveal his health is the one mystery they couldn’t crack

Ultra-Orthodox Jews become political football for Netanyahu

Former SLED investigator who testified at Alex Murdaugh trial fired from Charleston County Sheriff’s Office

Senators unveil bipartisan bill to safeguard children from AI chatbots

Brooklyn coffee shop that targeted Jewish congressman faces DOJ probe after reported tax, health code issues

Nearby Residents Told to Stay Inside as Semi Carrying Millions of Bees Overturns

Senate Schedule Rearranged as Mitch McConnell Is Set to Miss Another Full Week of Voting

Republicans break with Trump to rebuke Iran war — but it won’t change policy

DHS demands New York sanctuary politicians honor detainer for man convicted of raping corpse on subway

Marjorie Taylor Greene follows Tucker Carlson in ditching the ‘America Last’ Republican Party

Iranian leaders project newfound confidence with international travel spree

Top Republican pitches Trump plan to stop shutdowns, expose ‘bad guys’ blocking voter ID law

Cruz says Mamdani, AOC, Platner show Democrats’ leftward shift: ‘That’s where the energy is’

Social media erupts over Mamdani’s silence after Brooklyn coffee shop bans Jewish congressman

MLB Issues Unexpected Response on Players With Bible Verses on Uniforms, Says They Will Never Be Fined

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020