Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Pride flags removed, DEI back under fire, TV host’s Cali criticism

Platner shrugs off mounting controversies as ‘politically motivated’ and ‘false’ at rally

‘See you Monday’: Susie Wiles dismisses ‘Friday fiction’ she is eyeing White House exit

Trump expands TrumpRx prescription drug discount program to more than 800 medications

Sunny Hostin Admits She Hates America, Declares Country a ‘Failed Experiment’

Trump green lights new DNI Pulte to ‘start the process’ on mass intelligence firings

Forget Trump’s Bruised Hand – What Bobby Kennedy’s Hands Did in the ’68 Campaign Is 100x Worse – Yet the Media Adored Him

Virginia gun sales spike ahead of July 1 assault weapons ban signed by Gov. Spanberger

Paying for Klan Hoods, Cross Burnings, And an Imperial Wizard – The 6 Worst SPLC Sins Alleged in New Indictment

Report: Karmelo Anthony Has Visible Reaction as Intense Body Cam Footage Is Played in Court

Eric Schmitt rips Hirono over denaturalization bill: ‘You’re damn right we’re deporting’ criminals

Natasha Owens drops ‘TDS’ song and music video: ‘You tested positive’

Reporter’s Notebook: GOP bets on fraud crackdown as economic woes surge ahead of midterms

California election limbo fueled by 4 pressure points dragging out vote count, expert says

America at 250: The American Dream Still Begins With Marriage

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020