Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing

Are You Gay Enough To Get A California Utilities Contract? Here’s The Test

How a Ministry Is Spreading Christianity in Iran Using AI

Women accuse Pearadise founder of preying on them by turning ‘safe space’ into mansion of manipulation

NY governor hopeful vows showdown with Mamdani over socialist agenda: ‘I will stop him’

Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries

Trump-backed Letlow takes on John Fleming in runoff to replace Bill Cassidy

Incoming socialist DC mayor has a weak hand against Trump administration

People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules

Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’

American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps

Review: We’re all too old for the new ‘Toy Story’

Trump’s endorsement power faces new test in Louisiana Republican Senate showdown

Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme

New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020