Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Grand jury declines to indict Letitia James after earlier case collapsed

FBI says Jan. 6 pipe bomb suspect purchased bomb parts in 2019

Trump scores 10 extra nominees after snafu with Senate Democrats

Admiral Tells Congress He Had a Good Reason for Ordering Second Strike on Drug Boat

Violent retaliation against US citizens possible in Venezuela conflict, expert warns

Watch: Prince Harry Snipes at Donald Trump in Cringey Colbert Appearance

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Who is Brian Cole, the DC pipe bomb suspect?

NYU attack suspect allegedly assaulted woman days earlier, found burglarizing off-campus apartments: report

NYC teen arrested, charged with setting homeless subway rider on fire, police say

Alberta Pastor Arrested for Refusing to Apologize for Hurting Woke Librarian’s Feelings

Huge DC Pipe Bomb Twist Changes the Story – The Biden Admin Knew

Trump hosts ‘Washington Accords’ Rwanda-Congo peace deal signing, vows US rare earths purchases

Young Americans give big thumbs down to Democrats, Republicans, Trump: poll

Trump ‘most important president in maybe 100 years’

US announces ‘reconsideration’ of ties with Tanzania amid ‘disturbing violence against civilians’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020