Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Watch: Inept Texas Judge Blasted After Camera Catches Him Cursing Kind Computer Tech – Now His Nasty Emails Demanding Respect Have Leaked, Too

One of a Kind Video: Kid Rock Uses Apache Hovering Behind His House to Torment Gavin Newsom

Inside the daring rescue of airman behind enemy lines: How CIA assisted with ‘deception campaign’

Trump Admin to Investigate School District Accused of Putting Girls in Danger Over ‘Gender Identity’ Policy

Ex-Fox News Regular Suggests Trump’s US Is Beginning to Mirror North Korea

Trump vows US will strike Iran’s power plants, bridges if Strait of Hormuz is not reopened

Art heist targeting million-dollar masterpieces exposes blind spots in museum defenses, expert warns

Federal judge blocks Trump push to collect race-based admissions data

Scott Jennings Mocks Dems Over Radical ‘No Kings’ Rallies

Kangaroo Escapes Petting Zoo in Feat of Derring-Do, Leads Zookeeper on 3-Day Chase as Heat-Seeking Drone Helps Solve the Case

This Democrat vows to save Nebraska’s ‘Blue Dot.’ Critics say he’s the one putting it at risk

Man who put up $100K to find Nancy Guthrie says tipsters should skip the sheriff and call Crime Stoppers

Kamala Harris’ travels and comments clearly point to 2028

Artemis II astronauts face toilet trouble as they head toward the moon

Breaking: Downed US F-15 Crew Member Rescued After Evading Capture in Iranian Mountains

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020