Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Hamas agrees to complete disarmament under ‘historic’ Gaza agreement: Trump

Schiff-backed candidate abruptly ends gubernatorial campaign amid rumblings of a damaging report

Watch: Chuck Schumer Gets in Shouting Match with Heckler During News Conference

Trump Announces Plan to Replace Illegal Alien Truckers with American Veterans

Trump promotes Freedom Haulers Initiative to fast-track military veterans into trucking jobs

Virginia university report finds officials did not disclose student’s terror conviction

Watch: Eagles Defensive Coordinator Repeatedly Mocks Fauci During News Conference

House panel demands classified briefings on noncitizen voting, alleged Chinese election interference

Georgia mother fights off alleged child snatcher with gas pump in surveillance video

Watch: Mamdani Is Open to Forcing New Yorkers to Pay Cash Reparations for Slavery, Says ‘We Were Very Complicit’

War powers resolution fails as Senate Republicans stand by Trump on Iran

Thousands of migrants bull-rush Spanish border, sparking ‘total humanitarian and social emergency’

Florida AG threatens Fauci investigation after Senate hearing

Alex Murdaugh murder trial ‘egg juror’ fights to unseal state investigation into Becky Hill: report

Bryan Kohberger appointed new lawyer after Idaho murders case costs taxpayers over $8 million

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020