Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

NYPD officers save choking 2-year-old boy, bodycam video shows

Government shutdowns may be fewer, but they’re increasingly disruptive

Trump considers legal action against Michael Wolff and Epstein estate after latest document release

What Tyler Robinson’s defense wants hidden and why prosecutors and media say no in court

‘Christ or Chaos’: Former Pastor of Invaded Minneapolis Church Has a Message for America

How Activists Embed Leftist Ideology in K–12 Schools

Deputy attorney general says ‘I don’t know’ why Gabbard was present at Georgia FBI raid

Senate Republicans push for House GOP rebellion against funding package, voter ID legislation

From Rodney King to Spitting and Kicking Alex Pretti, the Left’s Flawed Hero Worship Never Changes

Former Planned Parenthood Worker Gives Haunting Account of Her Past Work

Melania Trump’s $8 million opening best documentary debut in over 10 years

What Trump’s next pick to lead the Federal Reserve means for your wallet

Hunter S. Thompson suicide ruling stands firm after 20-year review by Colorado investigators

The Left Doesn’t Care About Children, They Care About Using Them Because They Know You Care So Much

Black Pastor Gives Don Lemon a Warning After Storming Church: ‘Don Lemon, Don’t Come Here’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020