Bill comes amid focus on Sen. Mitt Romney and impeachment, but lawmaker says it isn’t to target him.
SALT LAKE CITY — A Utah lawmaker has filed a bill to allow Utahns to recall an elected United States senator.
The lawmaker, Rep. Tim Quinn, R-Heber City, told the Deseret News in an interview Wednesday shortly after the bill was made public that it’s not meant to target any specific sitting Utah senator — but it comes amid heightened national attention on Sen. Mitt Romney, who has been among the few Republican senators publicly critical of President Donald Trump.
Romney in recent days has ignited simmering controversy over whether to bring additional witnesses and documents into the impeachment trial against Trump. Yet Quinn said his bill isn’t aimed at Romney or any specific senator — though he acknowledged his bill comes at a time that people will likely construe it that way.
“I know that’s what’s going to be the narrative,” Quinn said. “If it were, then it might make sense to have a sunset on it. That would not be the case.”
Supreme Court takes up fight over Trump’s third-country illegal alien deportation policy
FBI’s Andrew Bailey blasts exit ‘lies’ as he reveals real reason he’s leaving agency
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn convicted of murdering his wife
Newly Uncovered Docs Blow Up Jack Smith’s Story About How His Investigation Into Trump Began
Breaking: Jack Smith Admits to Secretly Gathering Banking Info of Thousands of Trump Donors
Man found dead on tracks at Brooklyn subway station after his bag reportedly gets stuck in closing doors
Office of Personnel Management uncovers $500M in fraud and waste in federal health benefits programs
Soros nephew divulges how family’s power helped bankroll El-Sayed’s education during secretive fundraiser
Rivals skeptical as Netanyahu warns of ‘attack’ against Israel before Oct. 27 election
‘Instead of Enforcing the Law’: Dem Connecticut Faces 2A Court Fight with Major Gun Maker for Banning Popular Pistol
Hawks or Hawkeyes? Eric Schmitt’s Jack Smith grilling runs into basketball mix-up
Trans NYT Games executive killed after accusing in-laws of years of abuse amid bitter custody battle
Hollywood actress upset her son isn’t gay fumes in bizarre spectacle at Human Rights Campaign gala
Fed Up With Abuse, Holdout Clancy Juror Will Carry Out Aggressive Plan to Shut Up Killer’s Attorney
Republicans fear they ‘haven’t done a damn thing’ to lower prices ahead of midterm reckoning
Rather, Quinn said he started drafting the bill “weeks and weeks ago” after some constituents came to him raising ideas of how Utah could return to a “pre-17th Amendment” time, or when U.S. senators were appointed rather than elected.
To Quinn, a six-year term for a senator is a lengthy term, and his bill would be a “good mechanism in place to make any senator, current or future, a little more accountable to those who elected him or her.”
“Six years is a long time,” he said.
Pressed on the timing of the bill coinciding with heightened attention on Romney, Quinn said he started drafting the bill long ago, and it just happened to be ready Wednesday.
“Obviously I didn’t open this bill file after he made some of that news with impeachment, it would have never been drafted this quickly,” Quinn said. “So I can understand why people might think that, but if they understood the legislative process, this was well before that.”
The bill, HB217, would establish a process for legal voters to petition through signature gathering to place a question on the ballot to recall a U.S. senator.
It would require signatures equal to 25% of the number of active voters in the state on Jan. 1 immediately following the last regular general election. If that threshold is met, the lieutenant governor would place the recall question on the ballot of the next election that occurs at least 90 days after the question is certified.
Supreme Court takes up fight over Trump’s third-country illegal alien deportation policy
FBI’s Andrew Bailey blasts exit ‘lies’ as he reveals real reason he’s leaving agency
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn convicted of murdering his wife
Newly Uncovered Docs Blow Up Jack Smith’s Story About How His Investigation Into Trump Began
Breaking: Jack Smith Admits to Secretly Gathering Banking Info of Thousands of Trump Donors
Man found dead on tracks at Brooklyn subway station after his bag reportedly gets stuck in closing doors
Office of Personnel Management uncovers $500M in fraud and waste in federal health benefits programs
Soros nephew divulges how family’s power helped bankroll El-Sayed’s education during secretive fundraiser
Rivals skeptical as Netanyahu warns of ‘attack’ against Israel before Oct. 27 election
‘Instead of Enforcing the Law’: Dem Connecticut Faces 2A Court Fight with Major Gun Maker for Banning Popular Pistol
Hawks or Hawkeyes? Eric Schmitt’s Jack Smith grilling runs into basketball mix-up
Trans NYT Games executive killed after accusing in-laws of years of abuse amid bitter custody battle
Hollywood actress upset her son isn’t gay fumes in bizarre spectacle at Human Rights Campaign gala
Fed Up With Abuse, Holdout Clancy Juror Will Carry Out Aggressive Plan to Shut Up Killer’s Attorney
Republicans fear they ‘haven’t done a damn thing’ to lower prices ahead of midterm reckoning
Under the bill, an incumbent senator would not be subject to recall if the senator has not been in office for at least one year of his or her current term.
Quinn said he sees the bill as a “good compromise between pre- and post-17th Amendment” that contains a fitting standards to meet for a recall.
“I think it’s a fairly large hurdle,” Quinn said. “That’s a lot of signature gathering. So it’s not something that people would take lightly if someone ever did want to recall a sitting senator.”
However, it’s unclear whether Quinn’s bill is even constitutional.
The U.S. Constitution does not provide for recall of any federally elected officials. While some states have statutes to allow voters to recall members of Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet ruled on whether that’s constitutionally legal at the federal level.
However, a close legal precedent may be a 1995 Supreme Court ruling that decided states did not have the right to impose new term limits on federal officials, noted Adam Brown, a BYU political science professor.
Supreme Court takes up fight over Trump’s third-country illegal alien deportation policy
FBI’s Andrew Bailey blasts exit ‘lies’ as he reveals real reason he’s leaving agency
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn convicted of murdering his wife
Newly Uncovered Docs Blow Up Jack Smith’s Story About How His Investigation Into Trump Began
Breaking: Jack Smith Admits to Secretly Gathering Banking Info of Thousands of Trump Donors
Man found dead on tracks at Brooklyn subway station after his bag reportedly gets stuck in closing doors
Office of Personnel Management uncovers $500M in fraud and waste in federal health benefits programs
Soros nephew divulges how family’s power helped bankroll El-Sayed’s education during secretive fundraiser
Rivals skeptical as Netanyahu warns of ‘attack’ against Israel before Oct. 27 election
‘Instead of Enforcing the Law’: Dem Connecticut Faces 2A Court Fight with Major Gun Maker for Banning Popular Pistol
Hawks or Hawkeyes? Eric Schmitt’s Jack Smith grilling runs into basketball mix-up
Trans NYT Games executive killed after accusing in-laws of years of abuse amid bitter custody battle
Hollywood actress upset her son isn’t gay fumes in bizarre spectacle at Human Rights Campaign gala
Fed Up With Abuse, Holdout Clancy Juror Will Carry Out Aggressive Plan to Shut Up Killer’s Attorney
Republicans fear they ‘haven’t done a damn thing’ to lower prices ahead of midterm reckoning
“Applying that logic, it’s questionable whether a state law could allow early removal of a federal official,” Brown said. “If states can’t apply term limits to federal officials, it would be a stretch to think they could end a federal official’s service early.”
Neither Romney nor Sen. Mike Lee — both sitting in on impeachment proceedings — were available for comment Wednesday, according to their staff.
Story cited here.
