Bill comes amid focus on Sen. Mitt Romney and impeachment, but lawmaker says it isn’t to target him.
SALT LAKE CITY — A Utah lawmaker has filed a bill to allow Utahns to recall an elected United States senator.
The lawmaker, Rep. Tim Quinn, R-Heber City, told the Deseret News in an interview Wednesday shortly after the bill was made public that it’s not meant to target any specific sitting Utah senator — but it comes amid heightened national attention on Sen. Mitt Romney, who has been among the few Republican senators publicly critical of President Donald Trump.
Romney in recent days has ignited simmering controversy over whether to bring additional witnesses and documents into the impeachment trial against Trump. Yet Quinn said his bill isn’t aimed at Romney or any specific senator — though he acknowledged his bill comes at a time that people will likely construe it that way.
“I know that’s what’s going to be the narrative,” Quinn said. “If it were, then it might make sense to have a sunset on it. That would not be the case.”
Mexican Restaurant Owner Under Fire for Offering ICE Agents Free Meals Fires Back at Leftists: ‘They Need to Look for Jesus’
Reporter’s Notebook: Bondi’s binder strategy turns House hearing into political firestorm
CEO Resigns After His Disturbing Jeffrey Epstein Email Comes to Light: ‘I Loved the Torture Video’
Noem backs SAVE America Act, slams ‘radical left’ opposition to voter IDs and proof of citizenship
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Ransom deadline passes, key evidence emerges in Nancy Guthrie case
California middle school assistant principal nabbed in child sex sting
Don Lemon pleads not guilty to charges for storming Minnesota church
Trump admin rips Mamdani, local Dems as activists override gov’t move at NYC monument: ‘Focused on theatrics’
WATCH: Bill O’Reilly Thoroughly Debunk the Frequently Cited ‘Only 14% of Illegals Are Violent’ Argument Leftists Use Against Deportation
Minneapolis prosecutors charge few anti-ICE protesters amid mass unrest
See It: Ultra High-Res Image of Bondi’s Notes Shows Deadly Dirt on Dems She Walked Into Hearing Ready to Use if Necessary
ICE director stands his ground after Swalwell blowup, says Democrats are ‘misleading their constituents’
Fani Willis slams $17 million legal fees demand from Trump and former codefendants
Fetterman bucks Democrats, says party put politics over country in DHS shutdown standoff
Trump DOJ files new lawsuit accusing Harvard of withholding records on race in admissions
Rather, Quinn said he started drafting the bill “weeks and weeks ago” after some constituents came to him raising ideas of how Utah could return to a “pre-17th Amendment” time, or when U.S. senators were appointed rather than elected.
To Quinn, a six-year term for a senator is a lengthy term, and his bill would be a “good mechanism in place to make any senator, current or future, a little more accountable to those who elected him or her.”
“Six years is a long time,” he said.
Pressed on the timing of the bill coinciding with heightened attention on Romney, Quinn said he started drafting the bill long ago, and it just happened to be ready Wednesday.
“Obviously I didn’t open this bill file after he made some of that news with impeachment, it would have never been drafted this quickly,” Quinn said. “So I can understand why people might think that, but if they understood the legislative process, this was well before that.”
The bill, HB217, would establish a process for legal voters to petition through signature gathering to place a question on the ballot to recall a U.S. senator.
It would require signatures equal to 25% of the number of active voters in the state on Jan. 1 immediately following the last regular general election. If that threshold is met, the lieutenant governor would place the recall question on the ballot of the next election that occurs at least 90 days after the question is certified.
Mexican Restaurant Owner Under Fire for Offering ICE Agents Free Meals Fires Back at Leftists: ‘They Need to Look for Jesus’
Reporter’s Notebook: Bondi’s binder strategy turns House hearing into political firestorm
CEO Resigns After His Disturbing Jeffrey Epstein Email Comes to Light: ‘I Loved the Torture Video’
Noem backs SAVE America Act, slams ‘radical left’ opposition to voter IDs and proof of citizenship
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Ransom deadline passes, key evidence emerges in Nancy Guthrie case
California middle school assistant principal nabbed in child sex sting
Don Lemon pleads not guilty to charges for storming Minnesota church
Trump admin rips Mamdani, local Dems as activists override gov’t move at NYC monument: ‘Focused on theatrics’
WATCH: Bill O’Reilly Thoroughly Debunk the Frequently Cited ‘Only 14% of Illegals Are Violent’ Argument Leftists Use Against Deportation
Minneapolis prosecutors charge few anti-ICE protesters amid mass unrest
See It: Ultra High-Res Image of Bondi’s Notes Shows Deadly Dirt on Dems She Walked Into Hearing Ready to Use if Necessary
ICE director stands his ground after Swalwell blowup, says Democrats are ‘misleading their constituents’
Fani Willis slams $17 million legal fees demand from Trump and former codefendants
Fetterman bucks Democrats, says party put politics over country in DHS shutdown standoff
Trump DOJ files new lawsuit accusing Harvard of withholding records on race in admissions
Under the bill, an incumbent senator would not be subject to recall if the senator has not been in office for at least one year of his or her current term.
Quinn said he sees the bill as a “good compromise between pre- and post-17th Amendment” that contains a fitting standards to meet for a recall.
“I think it’s a fairly large hurdle,” Quinn said. “That’s a lot of signature gathering. So it’s not something that people would take lightly if someone ever did want to recall a sitting senator.”
However, it’s unclear whether Quinn’s bill is even constitutional.
The U.S. Constitution does not provide for recall of any federally elected officials. While some states have statutes to allow voters to recall members of Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet ruled on whether that’s constitutionally legal at the federal level.
However, a close legal precedent may be a 1995 Supreme Court ruling that decided states did not have the right to impose new term limits on federal officials, noted Adam Brown, a BYU political science professor.
Mexican Restaurant Owner Under Fire for Offering ICE Agents Free Meals Fires Back at Leftists: ‘They Need to Look for Jesus’
Reporter’s Notebook: Bondi’s binder strategy turns House hearing into political firestorm
CEO Resigns After His Disturbing Jeffrey Epstein Email Comes to Light: ‘I Loved the Torture Video’
Noem backs SAVE America Act, slams ‘radical left’ opposition to voter IDs and proof of citizenship
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Ransom deadline passes, key evidence emerges in Nancy Guthrie case
California middle school assistant principal nabbed in child sex sting
Don Lemon pleads not guilty to charges for storming Minnesota church
Trump admin rips Mamdani, local Dems as activists override gov’t move at NYC monument: ‘Focused on theatrics’
WATCH: Bill O’Reilly Thoroughly Debunk the Frequently Cited ‘Only 14% of Illegals Are Violent’ Argument Leftists Use Against Deportation
Minneapolis prosecutors charge few anti-ICE protesters amid mass unrest
See It: Ultra High-Res Image of Bondi’s Notes Shows Deadly Dirt on Dems She Walked Into Hearing Ready to Use if Necessary
ICE director stands his ground after Swalwell blowup, says Democrats are ‘misleading their constituents’
Fani Willis slams $17 million legal fees demand from Trump and former codefendants
Fetterman bucks Democrats, says party put politics over country in DHS shutdown standoff
Trump DOJ files new lawsuit accusing Harvard of withholding records on race in admissions
“Applying that logic, it’s questionable whether a state law could allow early removal of a federal official,” Brown said. “If states can’t apply term limits to federal officials, it would be a stretch to think they could end a federal official’s service early.”
Neither Romney nor Sen. Mike Lee — both sitting in on impeachment proceedings — were available for comment Wednesday, according to their staff.
Story cited here.
