Bill comes amid focus on Sen. Mitt Romney and impeachment, but lawmaker says it isn’t to target him.
SALT LAKE CITY — A Utah lawmaker has filed a bill to allow Utahns to recall an elected United States senator.
The lawmaker, Rep. Tim Quinn, R-Heber City, told the Deseret News in an interview Wednesday shortly after the bill was made public that it’s not meant to target any specific sitting Utah senator — but it comes amid heightened national attention on Sen. Mitt Romney, who has been among the few Republican senators publicly critical of President Donald Trump.
Romney in recent days has ignited simmering controversy over whether to bring additional witnesses and documents into the impeachment trial against Trump. Yet Quinn said his bill isn’t aimed at Romney or any specific senator — though he acknowledged his bill comes at a time that people will likely construe it that way.
“I know that’s what’s going to be the narrative,” Quinn said. “If it were, then it might make sense to have a sunset on it. That would not be the case.”
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’
Colorado mom allegedly bought alcohol daily for 16-year-old daughter found dead with 173 empty bottles
Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms
Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit
Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law
WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’
USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule
Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories
FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police
Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’
Obama Presidential Library Betrays Black Visitors, Issues Wildly Racist Demand on Website – at Least We’ve Been Told It’s Racist
Hundreds dead as Europe breaks temperature records during heat wave
Senate Republican pushes overhaul to cut red tape and speed up American energy projects
Mamdani and Hochul announce cash infusion for New York City Abortion Access Hub expansion
Rather, Quinn said he started drafting the bill “weeks and weeks ago” after some constituents came to him raising ideas of how Utah could return to a “pre-17th Amendment” time, or when U.S. senators were appointed rather than elected.
To Quinn, a six-year term for a senator is a lengthy term, and his bill would be a “good mechanism in place to make any senator, current or future, a little more accountable to those who elected him or her.”
“Six years is a long time,” he said.
Pressed on the timing of the bill coinciding with heightened attention on Romney, Quinn said he started drafting the bill long ago, and it just happened to be ready Wednesday.
“Obviously I didn’t open this bill file after he made some of that news with impeachment, it would have never been drafted this quickly,” Quinn said. “So I can understand why people might think that, but if they understood the legislative process, this was well before that.”
The bill, HB217, would establish a process for legal voters to petition through signature gathering to place a question on the ballot to recall a U.S. senator.
It would require signatures equal to 25% of the number of active voters in the state on Jan. 1 immediately following the last regular general election. If that threshold is met, the lieutenant governor would place the recall question on the ballot of the next election that occurs at least 90 days after the question is certified.
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’
Colorado mom allegedly bought alcohol daily for 16-year-old daughter found dead with 173 empty bottles
Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms
Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit
Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law
WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’
USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule
Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories
FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police
Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’
Obama Presidential Library Betrays Black Visitors, Issues Wildly Racist Demand on Website – at Least We’ve Been Told It’s Racist
Hundreds dead as Europe breaks temperature records during heat wave
Senate Republican pushes overhaul to cut red tape and speed up American energy projects
Mamdani and Hochul announce cash infusion for New York City Abortion Access Hub expansion
Under the bill, an incumbent senator would not be subject to recall if the senator has not been in office for at least one year of his or her current term.
Quinn said he sees the bill as a “good compromise between pre- and post-17th Amendment” that contains a fitting standards to meet for a recall.
“I think it’s a fairly large hurdle,” Quinn said. “That’s a lot of signature gathering. So it’s not something that people would take lightly if someone ever did want to recall a sitting senator.”
However, it’s unclear whether Quinn’s bill is even constitutional.
The U.S. Constitution does not provide for recall of any federally elected officials. While some states have statutes to allow voters to recall members of Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet ruled on whether that’s constitutionally legal at the federal level.
However, a close legal precedent may be a 1995 Supreme Court ruling that decided states did not have the right to impose new term limits on federal officials, noted Adam Brown, a BYU political science professor.
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’
Colorado mom allegedly bought alcohol daily for 16-year-old daughter found dead with 173 empty bottles
Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms
Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit
Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law
WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’
USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule
Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories
FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police
Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’
Obama Presidential Library Betrays Black Visitors, Issues Wildly Racist Demand on Website – at Least We’ve Been Told It’s Racist
Hundreds dead as Europe breaks temperature records during heat wave
Senate Republican pushes overhaul to cut red tape and speed up American energy projects
Mamdani and Hochul announce cash infusion for New York City Abortion Access Hub expansion
“Applying that logic, it’s questionable whether a state law could allow early removal of a federal official,” Brown said. “If states can’t apply term limits to federal officials, it would be a stretch to think they could end a federal official’s service early.”
Neither Romney nor Sen. Mike Lee — both sitting in on impeachment proceedings — were available for comment Wednesday, according to their staff.
Story cited here.
