U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Dem candidate who called for imprisoning ‘Zionists’ blames her own party, media for backlash

As China tensions loom, US temporarily pauses Taiwan weapons sales due to Iran war, acting Navy secretary says

Trump Celebrates ‘Total Jerk’ Colbert’s Official Cancellation, Shares Brutal Farewell Message: ‘He’s Finally Gone!’

COVID-Era CDC Director Claims Ebola Outbreak Could Become ‘Significant Pandemic’

Minnesota fraud suspect who jumped from building is arrested, FBI says

Trump not scheduled to attend Donald Jr.’s wedding in Bahamas

Militant Antifa Leftist Indicted for Allegedly Trying to Torch GOP Headquarters

85-year-old ‘hero’ stops man posing as utility worker trying to kidnap woman, authorities say

A Better Way for Christians to Engage Politics and Culture

Dem senators deflect questions on Platner’s scandal-plagued campaign: ‘Not following that race closely’

Trump champions bid to nix clock changes by adopting permanent daylight saving time

GOP caps turbulent week, pointing finger at White House for immigration bill blunder

Army cuts helicopters, pushes ‘Amazon for war’ as drone combat reshapes military

Massive SPLC-linked grant under fire as watchdog exposes ties to middle school programs

DOJ bolsters South Florida team investigating alleged anti-Trump conspiracy

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.