U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Former Florida law enforcement officer accused of forcing 6-year-old underwater in hotel pool: report

California family revives beloved Christmas tradition with surprise sleepover visit

$220 Million Green Bay Packers Star Sparks Controversy After Christmas Gifting Revelation

Trump to Meet Zelenskyy at Mar-a-Lago ‘to Work Out Issues as Much as Possible’

MAHA Hits Roadblock After Obama Judge Sides with Conglomeration of Food Dye Corporations

Christmas Tragedy: Grandfather Dies After Gruesome ‘Freak Accident’ at McDonald’s

Tiny Pacific nation to take up to 75 deportees as Trump administration accelerates mass removals

Misspelled learning center, no children inside: Emmer presses Walz over Minnesota daycare tied to $4M

Trump suggests he’ll call final shots on peace deal ahead of Zelenskyy meeting: ‘We’ll see what he’s got’

Kash Patel announces permanent closure of J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building for Reagan building move

Interior Department plans AI Theodore Roosevelt exhibit for America250

New motion seeks former Colorado Clerk Tina Peters’ release, challenging state after Trump’s pardon

Trump casts Maduro’s ouster as ‘smart’ move as Russia, China enter the fray

Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl in May 2026, says motherhood is ‘closest thing to Heaven on Earth’

Indicted Democrat edits $109,000 ring allegedly bought with stolen FEMA funds from photo

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.