U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Kash Patel taunts Swalwell with FBI sit-down as resignation fallout grows

Mamdani’s government-run grocery stores will fail ‘like every socialist experiment’: economist

Saudi Arabia Pushes Trump Admin to End Strait of Hormuz Blockade Over Fears About Repercussions: Report

Cop who killed drug suspect with Igloo cooler appeals conviction that made him an example

Husband of missing American woman will remain in Bahamas after jail release, attorney says

‘I Do Nothing for the Approval of Man’: Riley Gaines Responds After Trump Says He’s ‘Not a Big Fan’ of Hers

DOJ Signals Probe Into Brutal Assault of Conservative Journalist Filming Anti-ICE Riot

Far-left Senate hopeful’s radical ties to ‘Maduro cronies’ could torpedo campaign: ‘Tired of the chaos’

Push to oust Trump exposes cracks among Democrats on strategy, timing

George Conway Chokes Back Tears Talking About Blowing Nearly $1M on Joe Biden

Mike Johnson raises $500,000 to fight Spanberger’s gerrymandering push in Virginia

Ranking the 2028 Democratic hopefuls at Al Sharpton’s National Action Network

State by state: Here’s where ICE has made the most arrests under Trump

‘Smart decision’: Swalwell’s resignation spurs praise from both parties after bombshell allegations emerge

US military kills 2 suspected cartel operatives in latest Eastern Pacific lethal strike, SOUTHCOM says

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.