U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Republicans blast Democrats’ Trump election meddling claims as hypocritical ‘conspiracy theory’

Mounds of Snow and Trash Are Just the Opening Act of Mamdani’s Collectivist New York

Who is Kyle Wagner? Meet the self-identified Antifa member arrested after targeting ICE

Maryland Man Charged with Attempting to Murder Trump Administration Official

Suicide bomber kills dozens at Shiite mosque in Pakistan

Benghazi terror suspect extradited to face US charges

It’s AOC’s Party Now: Bernie-Backed Far-Leftist Could Win Dem Nomination to Replace ‘Moderate’ Sherrill in NJ

12 Minneapolis anti-ICE agitators arrested after massive crowd gathers outside Hilton hotel

First Nancy Guthrie Ransom Note Deadline Expires: ‘Do the Right Thing’

Shapiro fires back at DHS, says truck driver accused in deadly crash had legal status in database

RNC rolls out ‘powerful’ new TikTok strategy to win over key demographic after Trump’s 2024 success

‘Not Alaska First’: Peltola’s Green New Deal allies draw scrutiny in Alaska Senate bid

Hegseth says US strikes force some cartel leaders to halt drug operations

Can the late shah’s son sell the Trump administration on leading a postcleric regime in Iran?

Proposed California ‘wealth tax’ may backfire on liberal politicians as state’s revenue base dries up

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.