U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Maduro and ‘Lady Macbeth’ Cilia Flores marriage spells ‘worst case’ custody scenario

Pilot dies alongside 3 nieces on wedding day in tragic Arizona helicopter crash

Trump and Musk share ‘lovely dinner’ at Mar-a-Lago after public feuding

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s narco case echoes US history of targeting alleged foreign drug kingpins

The Obama, Biden War on Coal Created an Energy Crisis: Trump’s Policies Are Already Fixing it

Trump issues direct warning to Venezuela’s new leader Delcy Rodríguez following Maduro capture

Now That’s a Low Blow: MTG Accuses Trump of Being a Fake Christian

Dems Push Beth Macy as the Liberal Answer to JD Vance, Say She’s ‘What Vance Could Have Been’

Bible Sales Skyrocket in 2025, Massive Spike Following Charlie Kirk’s Murder

American jailed for billionaire’s Monaco death, plot to kill wife exposed in long con, expert says

Venezuela still owes US energy companies billions as Trump calls for new investment

Elected Democrat Busted Breaking Into a Car, Charged with Burglary

CIA Launched a Christmas Eve Strike Inside Venezuela: Report

Venezuelan government reasserts control over Caracas after Maduro arrest

Dan Bongino officially leaves FBI deputy director role after less than a year, returns to ‘civilian life’

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.