U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Reuters Goes Out of Its Way to Brand Male Trans Mass Shooter a Woman

Watch: The Moment Paul Rudd Schools Young Co-Stars on Jesus, the Fact That He’s Real, and How Rudd Wants to Meet Him

AG Pam Bondi announces ‘all’ Epstein files have been released, listing over 300 high-profile names

Hillary Clinton says migration ‘went too far’ and ‘needs to be fixed in a humane way’

Thousands rally in Munich against Iran regime before second round of nuclear talks

Rubio meets with Zelenskyy ahead of crucial Geneva talks as he says Trump wants solution that ‘ends bloodshed’

AOC’s Latest Word-Salad Answer on Taiwan Puts Even Kamala Harris to Shame

FAA Puts DEI in the Crosshairs, Threatens Any Airline That Doesn’t Hire By Merit

Over 190,000 ‘lethal’ doses of cocaine seized in Valentine’s Day week bust at southern border

‘Cheaters’: Trump Says Voter ID Will Be Required for Midterms Whether Congress Passes SAVE Act or Not

Retired FBI agent urges rapid DNA testing in Guthrie case: ‘You don’t wait for FedEx on Monday morning’

Alexei Navalny’s widow demands ‘accountability’ for Putin after European leaders say husband was poisoned

ICE ramps up deportation push by boosting capacity to 92,600 beds with $38.3B expansion

A $10 Walmart gun holster could help identify suspect in Nancy Guthrie case

Casey Wasserman to sell his talent agency after becoming ‘distraction’ due to Epstein files

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.