U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

NORAD Launches US Fighter Jets as Russian Military Aircraft Enter American Air Defense Identification Zone

Virginia Dems mandate Jan. 6 be taught as ‘violent insurrection,’ ban election fraud claims in schools

Trump Turns Up Heat on Republicans, Pressures Them to Pass SAVE Act: ‘Country Defining Fight for the Soul of Our Nation!’

Pentagon policy chief grilled as Dem claims Trump broke promise about going to war with Iran

Georgia sheriff arrested on DUI charge after blood alcohol content was allegedly almost triple legal limit

Small plane crashes into Phoenix home minutes after takeoff, injuring 3

‘Third-party’ auditor investigating Minnesota fraud received millions in state Medicaid funds

Macron vows nuclear arsenal boost as Europe turns to nukes amid rising global threats

‘Under siege’: Inside the growing radical Islam threat critics say is hiding in plain sight in deep red Texas

Walz-Ellison administration ‘enabled’ Minnesota’s fraud scandal: Guy Benson

NYC Dept of Education employee arrested, charged with murder of Bronx father

Savannah Guthrie returns to ‘Today’ show studio for first time since mother went missing

Iran widens regional war with first strike into Azerbaijan

5 House Oversight Committee Republicans Join with Democrats to Subpoena Pam Bondi in Epstein Probe

As Jasmine Crockett Concedes Texas Senate Primary, Attention Focuses on Radical Dem Who Beat Her

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.