U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

CIA Whistleblower Alleges Coverup of COVID-19 Lab Leak Intelligence

John Fetterman Opens Up About Phone Call to Erika Kirk, Rips Into Her Critics: ‘What’s Wrong With People?’

Hunter Biden resurfaces in LA, reacts to questions about Biden tapes, UFO files

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Bishop Barron to address ‘true threat to democracy’ at Trump prayer event

Bill Cassidy’s political future hangs in the balance

Senator John Kennedy introduces America to ‘Margaret,’ his elliptical trainer named after Thatcher

Waymo driverless cars overrun Atlanta neighborhood, circling cul-de-sacs and alarming families with kids

Lithuania and Poland forecast ‘military aid’ to help open Strait of Hormuz amid denials of US troop reductions in region

From Revival to Reformation: Why I’m Running for Governor of California

Here’s Where the Redistricting Wars Stand as the 2026 Midterms Approach

Trump Urged to Address Plight of Persecuted Chinese Minorities During Beijing Visit

In the Battle for School Choice, Families Get Stuck in the Middle

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Detransitioner drama, sex toy giveaways, shocking bathroom find

Former Christian school teacher sentenced after pleading guilty to child seduction charge

Colorado governor commutes Tina Peters’ sentence as Trump posts ‘FREE TINA!’

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.