U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Flock AI Tool Finds You Without a Name or Plate, ‘Can Be Targeted Against Anyone’

Shark sightings surge along southern Maine coast as experts explain what’s driving the spike

Iceland votes on resuming EU membership talks as Trump’s push for neighboring Greenland looms over debate

North Carolina warns mobile petting zoo visitors of rabies exposure after baby goats test positive

Retired Port Authority officers tell Mamdani, Hochul to stay away from Ground Zero on 9/11

Former California councilman’s corruption unmasked after FBI finds cash buried in backyard

El-Sayed’s Demeaning Usha Vance Comments Set Stage for Major Backfire with Key Demo

Mississippi mayor argues against lowering flag for Dolly Parton after her death

Obama Judge Once Again Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order

Dems face uphill battle in challenge to Georgia Congressional map under new SCOTUS rules

Fauci’s Gov’t Division Worked Hand in Glove with the CIA: Docs

Abdul El-Sayed peppered with questions on Hasan Piker link, fracture with Jewish Dems at Michigan convention

UN Told Merchant Ships Not to Arm Themselves Against Pirates as Piracy Escalates

NYC parolee accused of killing 2 in 48-hour robbery spree hauled in after manhunt, cops say

Seneca Nation leader calls Trump’s Lake America renaming ‘unpresidential,’ demands reversal

See also Dolly Parton dies at age 80

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.