U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Iran’s leaders don’t need to hide, envoy insists, despite MIA Khamenei and dead officials

Obama-appointed judge orders release of MS-13 gang member with history of rape, robbery, attacked ICE officers

California Democrats vying to be governor take on soaring gas prices

Trump staging assassination attempt theories don’t factor ‘shell shock’: Salena Zito

Man claiming CIA ties allegedly tries to slit commuter’s throat in unprovoked train attack

GOP triggers marathon Senate fight to expose Dems’ opposition to Trump-backed voter ID bill

Chief Justice Roberts warns against personal attacks on judges as ‘dangerous’ after Trump’s court tirade

Irish President Roasted for ‘Demoralising’ St. Patrick’s Day Message That Replaces Christ with Wokeness

Trump Warns of Permanent Consequences for Every Lawmaker Who Votes Against the SAVE America Act

NYC $30 minimum wage proposal pushed by Mamdani would ‘obliterate’ certain industries: expert warns

Trump bids goodbye to intel official who resigned over Iran: ‘Good thing that he’s out’

The Stunning Story of How Irish Christianity Saved the World

Emerging Intel on Iran’s New Leader Is Hilarious, Painful, and May Well Be Deathly, Too – Apparently He’s Not a Smart Man

NYC rooftop fire casts shadow on St Patrick’s Day Parade

New names emerge in Jack Smith’s wide-ranging bid for GOP lawmakers’ phone records, unearthed emails show

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.