U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Virginia Dems take tax hikes into overtime, target fantasy football leagues

Republican majority at risk? A look at the 6 GOP Senate seats most in jeopardy in midterm elections

Mob of anti-ICE activists to march on Portland mayor’s home

Epstein files implode British politics with ‘biggest scandal’ in ‘over one century’

Hegseth ending military education ties with Harvard amid Trump feud: ‘We train warriors, not wokesters’

Hegseth says National Guard members shot in DC ambush by Afghan national will receive Purple Heart

SBA freezes over 100,000 California borrowers in sweeping $9B pandemic fraud crackdown

Israeli Government-Funded ‘Mobile Museum’ Set to Visit US Churches to Promote Zionism

Hundreds of Bizarre References to ‘Pizza’ in New Epstein Documents Raise Eyebrows

Watch: NFL Players Accidentally Prove Bad Bunny Is a Horrible Choice for Super Bowl Halftime Show

Conservative firebrand vows to purge ‘RINOs’ in battle to replace retiring Vern Buchanan in open Florida seat

When anti-ICE clashes trigger federal intervention: Experts explain the constitutional breaking point

North Carolina man charged with three counts of statutory rape held on ICE detainer

Nancy Guthrie’s Neighbor Details Mysterious Sighting Shortly Before Disappearance

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Top teachers’ union under fire, anti-ICE agitator network exposed

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.