U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Red States Unite Against California Over It’s Alleged Plot To Impose Green Agenda On Nation

New York Might Make Mamdani’s City-Owned Grocery Stores Permanent

NY AG hopeful blasts Letitia James as Medicaid fraud recoveries collapse: ‘She’s not doing the job’

Trump nominates Oklahoma law enforcement veteran Lance Schroyer to lead ICE as permanent director

Two 14-year-olds flee MTA officers, remain missing after vanishing from New Jersey train station

Judge rules Dan Sullivan can appear on Alaska primary ballot against Sen. Dan Sullivan

Jeffries welcomes Democratic Socialists into the fold as critics warn party is revealing ‘exactly who it is’

Polygamous sect leader convicted of abuse charges after girls found in trailer on Arizona highway

Hezbollah rejects Israel and Lebanon’s peace framework: ‘Null and void’

Trump unloads on ‘lunatic’ John Bolton after ex-aide pleads guilty in classified docs case

Man who set Virginia council member on fire over alleged affair gets 40-year sentence

Carville calls for formal ‘schism’ with socialist candidates: ‘Can’t be in the same party’

Bill Maher presses Vance over Trump’s election fraud claims: ‘That s*** has to stop’

Former House intel leader points to Dem rhetoric ‘encouraging’ violence as 8th man charged in UFC terror plot

Hollywood Libs Pour Love on Beijing, Tout China as ‘First Petro-Zero Economy,’ But Facts Show Different Story

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.