U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Single Chart Shows DNC’s Downfall Among the American Electorate Since 2009

Sanders caught on camera snapping at reporter over Platner’s posts: ‘Get a better job’

Former Detroit mayor blows governor’s race wide open in surprise move

Trump Admin Moves to Supercharge Deportations with Unprecedented Immigration Judge Addition

NASCAR Star Kyle Busch Hospitalized with ‘Severe’ Medical Issue

Senate Republicans Deal a Serious Blow to Trump’s White House Ballroom Project

RNC legal victory clears North Carolina voter roll purge of noncitiznes through jury responses

Rep. Jim Jordan asks whether Southern Poverty Law Center paid Jan. 6 confidential sources

‘Seattle can’t survive this’: Critics hammer socialist mayor after Starbucks reversal

Zohran Mamdani announces $50 World Cup tickets for New Yorkers

Wall Street banks helped Chinese military-linked firm raise billions despite red flags, lawmakers find

Republicans recoil as Trump’s billion-dollar DOJ ‘slush fund’ for allies threatens ICE, Border Patrol plan

Manhunt underway after woman allegedly assaulted inside Harvard dorm, suspect spotted at MIT: officials

Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Mamdani snubs the Jews again

‘A Day I Hoped Would Not Come’: Susie Wiles Laments as Key Official Exits White House

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.