U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Three college students face federal charges over alleged threats against Trump ahead of campus rally

Trump planning a 10-state travel blitz in the midterms’ closing stages — visiting all but one battleground

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Christianity rejected, socialist streamer speaks, violence glorified

FBI’s first cyber fugitive on Ten Most Wanted list returns to US after capture in Venezuela

Blue state councilman mocked after claiming self-driving cars are ‘murdering’ pets: ‘Hide your cats’

Watch: Letitia James Has No Answer When Reporter Points Out Big Problem with Her Cornell Move

DNA Test Leads to Adopted Man Learning His Biological Father Is a Rock-and-Roll Legend

Justice Department Finds UCLA Law Has Been Discriminating Against White, Asian Applicants for Years

Watch: Reporter Narrowly Dodges ‘Murder Attempt’ While Filming Outside ‘Taxpayer Funded Drug Dealing Operation’

‘Cornell 7’ Case Turns Political as Kathy Hochul Gets Involved with Executive Order

Los Angeles County Rolls Out New 10.25 Percent Sales Tax

FBI overhauls tech backbone to counter AI threats from foreign adversaries, reduce response times, Patel says

Gypsy Rose Blanchard’s partner, Ken Urker, found dead inside his Louisiana home: sheriff

Amazon expands Prime settlement payouts: Do you qualify?

Dems demanding Venezuela brief face State Department fury as senators leave town without answers

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.