U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Transgender lawmaker ‘doesn’t know what a woman is,’ White House says after dig at Trump firings

Hakeem Jeffries left scrambling after child reporter asks why voters view Democrats so negatively

Rob Reiner’s Oldest Son Speaks Out for First Time Since Parents’ Death: ‘Too Impossible to Process’

Israel Appoints Its First Ever ‘Special Envoy to Christian World’ After Controversial Incidents

UC Berkeley slammed after anti-Israel group hosts failed suicide bomber as guest event speaker: ‘cesspool’

Semitruck driver in deadly interstate crash fraudulently obtained license, citizenship: Officials

How mutiny at Southern Poverty Law Center triggered leadership collapse

Trump DOJ jumps into Musk xAI court battle as diversity fight heats up

GOP lawmaker targets left-wing jury nullification trainings in DC

How Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison is embroiled in the Feeding Our Future scandal

Tim Tebow Announces the Death of His Father Like Only a Christian Could

Erika Kirk Quietly Arranged a White House Summit Between Trump and Disgruntled Influencers: Report

SPLC indictment builds momentum for Bessent’s Treasury to probe partisan nonprofits

Justice Department announces it’s readopting the firing squad as a means of execution

DOJ drops investigation into Jerome Powell, clearing way for Trump Fed pick Kevin Warsh

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.