U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Obama-appointed judge torches Trump admin in latest courtroom showdown, refers attorney for Bar review

Family shattered after 3-time deported illegal immigrant allegedly blew through stop sign, roiling House race

Judge bars Trump from using IRS immunity deal to evade investigation over past tax filings

Breaking: Trump Reinstates Naval Blockade on Iran in Strait of Hormuz as Attacks Ramp Up

USMC flags candidate in Hegseth’s district as ‘incongruent with Marine Corps standards’

Trump makes surprise pick to fill Graham’s Senate seat

Mick Jagger Says Musicians and Athletes Should Entertain Fans, Not ‘Lecture’ Them About Politics

WV town’s police department thrown into chaos by evidence room fiasco, but officials say no one was fired

Lindsey Graham left behind modest wealth despite decades in Washington’s elite circles

Charlie Kirk’s close friend calls for death penalty for convicted assassins

Sick Man-Child: Tim Walz Bringing National Guard Back from DC After Rubio Deports Child Rapist Walz Pardoned

More Arson? Investigators Sift Through Ashes at Landmark 173-Year-Old Church Searching for Clues

Conservative groups say Justice Kagan cannot be impartial in upcoming Supreme Court climate litigation

Michigan Dem senator throws support behind candidate to replace him in contentious primary

California Eco-Tyranny Destroyed By New EPA Rule

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.