U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Damning Text Messages: Biden DOJ Lawyers Created Witch Hunt Targeting Catholic Nuns and Laughed About Hunting Them Down

FCC Chairman Clarifies Action Against ABC in Wake of Kimmel Controversy

Top school district put on notice as watchdog group threatens legal action over gender policy

Watch: Jasmine Crockett Claims She’s One of the Most ‘Powerful’ People in the Country, Slams Those Not ‘On the Same Level’

Time is running out for Virginia Supreme Court to decide on redistricting referendum

No Good Deeds Go Unpunished By Our European ‘Allies’ and Their Total Inaction

600 groups with $2B in revenue mobilize 3,000 May Day protests in a ‘red-blue’ alliance, probe finds

Trump and GOP lawmakers push for executive mansion expansion

The little labor negotiation that could keep rails moving

Vance, Cruz, head to Iowa on 2026 missions as 2028 GOP race to succeed Trump heats up

Suspect arrested for allegedly running meth lab at Michigan State University’s largest academic building

Two Kentucky bank employees shot and killed during robbery, police hunting suspect

Dominican migrant with deportation order, wanted for murder in home country freed by Biden-appointed judge

Wyoming official faces backlash after posting ‘hang bad judges’ comment on abortion ruling

Doctor and son accused of running dangerous side-business scheme in New York

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.