U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Diesel Just Hit $5.90 a Gallon with Refineries Maxed Out: Winter Won’t Get Any Better

‘History Worth Teaching’: Trump Demands Smithsonian Replace Woke Modernist Nonsense Giant Statue of Washington

GOP women sound alarm as Lindsay Clancy backlash revives calls to repeal 19th Amendment: ‘Definitely a threat’

Georgia killer who murdered two suburban real estate agents faces execution after 23-year wait for justice

Burglar Armed with Submachine Gun Raids Missouri House: The Homeowner Sent Him Home in a Body Bag

Police Called to Kamala Harris’s Malibu Mansion After Unknown Woman ‘Illegally Entered’

With ‘Choosin’ Texas,’ we’re all choosin’ Ella Langley

Deep-pocketed donors flocked to the SPLC to heal America’s divisions. Did it pay off?

Penn State frat cocaine bust blows lid off wider stimulant scourge hitting college campuses — and beyond

Vulnerable House Republicans embrace Trump as GOP bets on defying midterm history

Trump faces major test over appointing US attorneys without Senate approval

Black conservative reveals how GOP can lock down minority voters without Trump on ballot

Sweden’s right-wing government hoping nationalist-populist allies will hold back left-wing coalition

Wisconsin GOP governor candidate swims from sinking plane after emergency lake landing

Man accused in brutal motel stabbing sought as person of interest in 4 deaths, child attack

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.