U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital

DOJ quietly closes autopen investigation targeting Biden and aides

Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire

GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge

Unearthed video shows Dem candidate supporting ‘reallocation’ of police funding to social service programs

Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns

Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected

BREAKING: Senate Rejects Dems’ War Powers Resolution Trying to Tie Trump’s Hands on Iran

DHS defends McLaughlin against allegations husband’s company profited millions from ad contracts: ‘Baseless’

Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who died by suicide: ‘Lapse in judgment’

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Feels the Heat During Fraud Hearing in DC: ‘You Should Go to Jail’

FBI spox unleashes on media’s ‘transparent spin job’ that recent firings were ‘devastating’ to Iran work

Pam Bondi faces bipartisan subpoena over frustration with DOJ’s release of Epstein files

Pritzker Tries to Laugh Off Bill Clinton’s Under Oath Statement That Illinois Governor Traveled with Epstein

Developing: FBI Investigating as Mystery ‘Holocaust 2.0’ Messages Make Their Way to Stanford Students

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.