U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Not Only Is Radical, Senile Maxine Waters Refusing to Retire at 87, She Could Chair Powerful Committee Come Next January

Netflix Hikes Prices for Second Time in Just Over a Year

NASA races to build moon base as US challenges China in new space race

Soros-backed group among liberal orgs pumping eye-popping cash into Virginia gerrymandering effort

Spanish government’s Jimmy Gracey autopsy claims stump forensic expert: ‘problem for me’

Texas Man Lashes Out in Stabbing Attack After Hearing Bible Conversation

Blue State Senator Admits How Democrats Prioritize Illegals in Resurfaced Clip

House GOP rams through new DHS funding plan with shutdown far from over

Facial recognition helped crack alleged student murder by illegal migrant – new bill could ban it: ret. cop

Trump administration locks out Greg Bovino from all social media accounts

Schumer’s prized 2026 recruits won’t commit to keeping him as Senate leader

Spanberger denies ‘deal’ with swing-district Democrat as gerrymandering claims abound statewide

House Republicans pass rival DHS plan, setting up Senate fight as shutdown set to become longest in history

Fulton County makes case for return of 2020 ballots seized by FBI

At least 2 students killed, several injured in school bus crash in Tennessee: ‘A parent’s worst nightmare’

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.