U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Democrats warn Trump green-lighting Nvidia AI chip sales could boost China’s military edge

Prominent Rhode Island Democrat caught on video telling officer, ‘You know who I am?’ during DUI stop

Two more senior Heritage Foundation fellows resign as exodus continues

Bill Maher Eviscerates Pro-Palestinian Leftists Who Ignore Islamist Violence: ‘You’re a Joke’

Nick Fuentes says he’ll campaign against Vivek Ramaswamy in Ohio in slur-laced rant

San Francisco Woman Gives Birth in the Back of Self-Driving Taxi – It Wasn’t the First Time

Top 5 takeaways from latest Jeffrey Epstein files dump

Share of Canadians Taking Their Own Lives with Assisted Suicide Gets Disturbingly High

Convicted killer Scott Peterson keeps swinging in court — but expert says he’s not going anywhere but his cell

How Charlie Kirk Inspired ‘The Five’ Panelists to Start a Morning Bible Study

Woman in Florida Barnes & Noble stabbed to death, police seek motive

Five sleeper races that could upend 2026 – from Pennsylvania’s Alleghenies to New Mexico

Marijuana companies spent millions on lobbying ahead of Trump rescheduling order

Judge gives ‘green light’ to controversial New York driver’s license law in blow to Trump admin

New Trump admin envoy says US won’t ‘conquer’ Greenland, emphasizes talks with locals as Denmark balks at move

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.