U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Trump energy czar says Iran conflict gas spike is ‘temporary blip’ as drilling push ramps up

TSA callouts hit Houston, Atlanta, New Orleans hardest, 450 officers have quit nationwide

Chicago Democrat Suggests Woman Murdered by Illegal ‘Startled’ Her Killer, Shares Blame

Massive Explosion Rocks Texas Refinery, Triggers Shelter-in-Place

USC pulls plug on California gubernatorial debate after candidate race controversy

Trump admin rolls out ‘Product of USA’ campaign for American meat, poultry, and egg products

IL Dems decline to defend ‘no’ votes on Laken Riley Act after student’s killing tied to repeat offender

Jack Smith team secretly sought years of Kash Patel phone records, new docs show

CPAC tests Cornyn with offer of speaking slot

Pentagon leaders award 2 Purple Hearts to Old Dominion cadets who took down ISIS supporter

With Midterms and Trump’s Future on the Line, GOP Brags 7-1 Cash Advantage Over Debt-Saddled Democrats

Dem Candidates Keep Getting Weirder: ‘Moderate’ TX Dem Played M*********** Pervert Who Was Supposed to Be Cute in Bizarre Video

Kermit Gosnell, found guilty of murdering infants at Philadelphia abortion clinic, is dead at 85

Lawmakers’ airport perks in crosshairs as DHS shutdown snarls travelers, TSA

Afghanistan frees US citizen Dennis Coyle over a year after Taliban arrest

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.