U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Lexington, Kentucky park shooting kills 1, injures 4 during live band performance

Last-Ditch Effort to Kill Trump Fossil Fuel EOs Goes Down in Flames

Family killer Chris Watts seeks prison marriage with new love interest: report

Why Did Pollsters Get Michigan And Wisconsin Primaries So Wrong?

Jon Ossoff, Georgia’s first Jewish senator, faces angry Jewish voters

Trump’s men at the United Nations

Swing-state’s fraud reckoning raises Minnesota-style alarm as wild schemes exposed

Mundane DOJ Memo on Post Office Gun Bans Is Actually Bigger Deal Than You Think

ICE bought nonlethal shock gloves for officers. Democrats still are not pleased

Americans clash over transgender athletes as debate heats up: ‘Just getting outrageous’

Routine California traffic stop leads to seizure of 30 pounds of cocaine worth more than $800K

New Report Says Chinese Cameras Used in Naval Assets Secretly Sent Data to Communist Country

Alaska runner hospitalized after using bear spray to fight off brown bear on Alaska trail

Nevada man funneled 140 guns to violent Mexican drug cartels, including powerful ‘military-style’ rifles: DOJ

Ex-detective who served fraction of 102-year sentence faces new charges after cold case review

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.