U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Newsom targets major affordability squeeze in ‘striking’ convergence with Trump

Kamala Harris dives into midterm fight only to get roasted for never having ‘an original thought in her life’

Biden-era FBI took ‘minimal corrective action’ and defended staff after targeting Catholics

White House report card: Lake America won’t save Trump from drowning

ICE officer charged in Minneapolis shooting released in Texas after judge declines to intervene

Glenn Beck interview prompts Trump to allow farmers and ranchers to process their own food

U.S. Military Uses Lasers to Shoot Down Mexican Cartel Drones at Southern Border

The Psychology Behind Republicans Who Support Amnesty for Illegals

Soros-backed DA accused of going easy on illegal immigrants gets squeezed by House GOP

House Dem Debbie Dingell places Trump’s Lake Ontario name change in the crosshairs

Free climber stranded on Georgia rock face calls 911, prompting dramatic rescue by firefighter

Maine and Georgia could test whether ticket-splitting is making a comeback

Dems derided Trump’s midterm gamble — until he ended up winning big

Mail-voting crackdown moves ahead as Trump court win opens door to federal action

Brutal Cheap Shot: Video Captures Amazon Driver Sucker Punching Elderly Man Over Parking Dispute

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

See also Dolly Parton dies at age 80

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.