U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus

Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter

Delaney Hall protests intensify as far-left activists, ICE supporters converge in New Jersey

Gov. Sherrill blames ICE, defends rioters after deploying troopers to quell violent mob

What The Left’s Colorado Climate Lawsuit Is Really All About

New Yorker Sentenced To 40 Years in Prison After Slaying 4 People on a Midnight Rampage

CBS News’ Bari Weiss Fired A ’60 Minutes’ Producer Citing ‘New Approach’

Who Was in Charge? Dems Owe Answers After Jill Biden Says She Thought Joe Was ‘Having a Stroke’ During Debate

Why Does the Media Care That Has-Beens Are Withdrawing From ‘Freedom 250’ DC Event?

Watch: Mysterious Strangers Pile Out of Sewer Manhole, Prompts Police Investigation

WATCH: Disgraceful UK Police Chief Apologizes for Letting Student Bleed Out Because He Was Accused of Being a Racist

Anti-ICE agitator charged with allegedly biting officers during Delaney Hall clashes

Will China Really Invade Taiwan In The Next Five Years?

Trump threatened to ‘blow up’ Oman — why the tiny Gulf kingdom is caught between DC and Iran

Buyer’s Remorse: The Democratic Party’s Radical Lurch and the Reckoning It Invited In

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.