U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

GOP veteran defeats populist candidate in one of America’s most conservative districts

MAGA triumph: Trump ally Ken Paxton defeats John Cornyn in bitter Texas GOP primary war

We Could Cover 10 Percent of the Entire Deficit if Gov’t Stopped Accidentally Making Improper Payments

Owner of Trump House Who Was Brutally Beaten Has Died – Wife Believes Politics Motivated Murder

Reparations-Backing California Candidate Run Out of Black LA Neighborhood Over His ‘Devil Blue Eyes’

Murder-suicide probe underway after alleged Tom Selleck impersonator scam targeted woman

Mamdani faces a Muslim problem ahead of Gracie Mansion protest

DOJ sues UCLA for fostering ‘hostile’ antisemitic environment for Jewish and Israeli students

Thom Tillis Unloads on Hegseth, Ken Paxton in Weekend Tantrum as GOP’s Establishment Wing Faces Extinction

Graham Platner vows to ‘come after’ Bezos as Senate hopeful escalates billionaire tax fight

Woman killed by flying restaurant umbrella in freak accident at South Carolina lakeside restaurant

Ousted Senate Republican digs in against Trump, takes jab at leadership style

Democrats’ Official X Account Forced to Delete Horribly Disrespectful Memorial Day Post – But We’ve Got the Original

Jake Auchincloss denies supporting Collins in Maine Senate race after opposing Planter bid

Redistricting push in South Carolina fails after state Senate bails

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.