U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Data Center Cash Cow Dries Up as States Pull the Rug on Big Tech

Charlie Kirk Memorial Smeared With Red Paint, Sign Defaced as TPUSA Vows to Work With Authorities to Find Vandals

DSA-backed candidates are winning primaries and their vision for America is very different

Trump touts White House renovations, says building was in ‘very bad condition’

Federal judge rules Trump admin plan to cut FEMA workforce in half is unlawful

Trump says China ‘spies’ on US after report ties Chinese imagery to Iran strike

California football coach arrested after students make disturbing discovery at school

Maryland dad blamed ‘Satan’ after 2-month-old daughter died from horrific head trauma

Creepy ‘Cat in the Hat’ trend targets schools as costumed figure allegedly chases teen girl

Missing 70-year-old hiker rescued after disappearing for a week in remote national park

Trump offers update on White House press secretary sweepstakes

Trump unloads on AOC, Mamdani for laughing during sacred 9/11 ceremony at Ground Zero

GOP gov candidate recounts miracle water landing as dispatch audio reveals desperate search for sinking plane

Trump says Lindsay Clancy case is a ‘state situation’ following attorney’s pardon plea

Charlie Kirk statue defaced with red paint, Jesus crossed out days after 1-year mark of assassination

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.