U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

US Sanctions Foreign Entities Accused Of Sharing Satellite Imagery, Access to Arms to Prop Up Iran’s War Effort

The unexpected force keeping beef prices high and why the pressure could last for years

How Al Qaeda repositioned itself to dominate the central Sahel

Pennsylvania man accused of fatal arson after woman allegedly rejected his advances

Virginia Dems Make Glaring Errors In Rushed Court Motion To Save Gerrymandering Scheme

Hegseth says Pentagon will review Mark Kelly’s public statements about classified briefing amid ongoing feud

Rebukes of Trump’s Pick for FDA Head Miss One Critical Fact

Union-funded anti-Spencer Pratt ad sparks backlash as critics say it could help him

Students’ pre-prom gathering turns into deadly nightmare as bullets fly

Marco Rubio Reveals the Message He Delivered Pope Leo During ‘Important Meeting’ at Vatican

Mom charged with child abuse after toddler found with tattoo in ‘deplorable’ home: cops

Trump says US helped secure release of 5 prisoners in Belarus deal, thanks Lukashenko

Savannah Guthrie urges public to help find missing mother Nancy in emotional Mother’s Day post

Kristin Smart search ends with no remains found as detectives analyze evidence

Watch: MLB Team Makes ‘Middle School Mistake’ As Season Continues to Spiral

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.