U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Teacher of the Year finalist gets 14 years for sexual relationship with student she kept contacting

Top Ten King-Like Things Barack Obama Did That Democrats Had No Problem With

Fugitive illegal alien convict on the run after attempting to strike ICE officer with vehicle: DHS

Charlie Kirk Memorial Bill Vetoed by Swing-State Dem Governor Who Said It Didn’t ‘Bring People Together’

DHS slams California ‘sanctuary’ county after mom allegedly murdered by 2 Honduran nationals

Woman dies after falling from 60-foot cliff along popular Smoky Mountains trail

Rep Rashida Tlaib moves to block US operations in Lebanon but ignores Hezbollah

Trump’s TSA Executive Order Appears to Have Had Immediate Impact at Busiest Airports

Trump Reveals New White House Ballroom Will Have a ‘Massive,’ Hidden Military Purpose

Pentagon cites ‘meritocracy’ as reported officer promotion removals draw Democratic criticism

Providence mayor calls for removal of Iryna Zarutska mural, says intent is ‘divisive,’ ‘misguided’

Video shows latest Los Angeles street takeover as mob wreaks havoc, vandalizes occupied city bus

Emanuel pushes back on ‘straight White man’ question, says ideas matter most in 2028

Watchdog targets taxpayer-funded National Academies over DEI, climate and transgender spending

Police arrest dozens after LA No Kings graffiti urges ICE killings

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.