U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Federal judge blocks Alabama redistricting plan in blow to Trump

Markwayne Mullin goes off on Dems’ ‘garbage’ Memorial Day ‘political stunt’ at ICE facility

Alex Murdaugh trial clerk reemerges after explosive ruling upends murder conviction

Chicago sees at least 25 shot over Memorial Day weekend as police cancel officers’ days off

Sports Commentator Blasts Giants QB for Meeting Trump Without ‘Consulting’ Locker Room

Iran Claims to Have Shot Down a US Drone, Threatens Further Retaliation

Trump will head to Walter Reed for his annual physical

Hasan Piker names pro-CCP tycoon Singham as financier of ‘political movements’ despite nonprofit veneer

Massie positions himself for potential political future after primary defeat: ‘I won’t be going away silently’

Trump-backed candidates score major boost from deep-pocketed AI Super PAC in upcoming primaries

How AIPAC’s spending strategy evolved, to the dread of anti-Israel Democrats and Republican detractors

Tulsi Gabbard honors wish of Gold Star wife to visit husband’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery

Trump flexes MAGA muscle in Texas Senate runoff clash between Cornyn and Paxton

Skydiver dies after midair collision with another jumper during group jump in Washington state

Dog accidentally fires shotgun, striking woman yards away during chaotic gas station stop

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.