U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Trump-backed Hilton advances to California governor general election

WATCH: As Fraud Accusations Swirl, Nick Shirley Confronts ‘126 Year-Old’ Who Voted in 51 Elections, According to California Sec. of State

Fetterman refuses to defend Platner, calls him ‘baggage’ as scandals mount

ALERT: Trump Launches Strikes After Iran Downed Apache, Fulfilling His Promise to Respond

Riots consume Belfast over attempted beheading by Sudanese immigrant

Cornyn won’t campaign for Paxton in Texas Senate race against Talarico

Progressive groups launch anti-Schumer billboard campaign in Washington

UFO whistleblower pushes Vance to investigate alleged billions of federal ‘slush funds’ tied to classified programs

Jurors Were Aghast and Karmelo Anthony Wouldn’t Look as Gruesome Image of Austin Metcalf’s Punctured Heart Was Presented at Trial

Tim Walz Gets Referred to DOJ for ‘Full Criminal Investigation’

Stephen A. Smith fires back at Trump over ‘low IQ’ jab: ‘Put my IQ up against yours’

Obama pays tribute to chef who tragically drowned at vacation compound with new honor

DHS directs ICE to deport illegal immigrants who vote in American elections under new directive

Nancy Guthrie sheriff caught with undeclared gun at airport faced no charges, bodycam video shows

WATCH: SPLC chief doubles down on placing Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA on ‘hate map’

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.