U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Multiple suspects are possible in Nancy Guthrie’s abduction

DHS says 8% of Nicaragua’s entire population illegally entered US under Biden

NORAD scrambles jets to intercept Russian bombers near Alaska

Husband of Ohio teacher charged with wife’s murder days after she was found dead in home

Hollywood Reporter All But Admits Network Hosts Would End All Political Interviews Before Platforming Critics of Democrats

Foreign agents pump large amounts of cash into campaigns ahead of 2026 elections

Illinois lieutenant governor seeking US Senate seat releases video of people saying ‘F— Trump’

Hollywood Legend Becomes Latest Billionaire to Flee California

The Golden Girls: US Women Thrive on the Ice at the Winter Olympics

Report: CNN’s Jake Tapper Is Getting Blamed For a New Network Policy, And He’s Not Happy About It

Ex-Victoria’s Secret CEO’s lawyer caught on hot mic jokingly threatening to ‘kill’ him at Epstein deposition

6 mothers who ‘cherished time together’ among victims in avalanche near Lake Tahoe

Woman charged with animal abandonment after leaving dog tied at JetBlue counter at Las Vegas airport

Documents show Epstein received pitch for properties housing Pentagon, FBI tenants after 2008 conviction

Buttigieg, Newsom, AOC top three in new 2028 poll in key presidential primary state

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.