U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Dem Congressional Candidate Caught Bringing Sex Offender Who Victimized 8-Year-Old with Him to School Event

Mamdani-Backed Candidate Who Blamed 9/11 on American ‘Capitalism and Racism’ Wins Democratic Primary

Comer probes alleged Biden collusion with gun control activists in Glock lawsuit

‘He named names’: Trump’s Senate meeting explodes into shouting match over Iran

California sues Trump EPA over move to subject state vehicle emissions waivers to congressional review

‘Free Karmelo’ mob hunted woman in bloody attack as thugs shouted support for killer, victim says

Biden judge torches Trump ICE crackdown as ‘devoid of rational explanation,’ nukes courthouse arrest policy

Letitia James fumes as Mamdani-backed socialists sweep New York primaries

Trump Suddenly Cancels Housing Bill Signing with Minutes to Spare, Demands SAVE America Act on His Desk

US Mint to produce limited-edition July 4 quarters for America 250

Trump declares ‘national emergency,’ demands housing overhaul bill be scrapped in SAVE Act push

What to know about Trump’s Great American State Fair kick-off rally

DEI Exec Fired After Getting Caught on Camera Allegedly Stealing at Knicks Championship Parade

Stephen A. Smith questions why activists are still defending Karmelo Anthony after guilty verdict

Bill Gates’ Epstein Testimony Released – Humiliating Revelations, Chilling Russian Connections

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.