U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Trump admin threatens Iran with ‘consequences’ as allies convene amid threats of post-election escalation

Watch: Muslim Debater Begs Security to Remove Christian Apologist After He Tells the Truth About Islam

Watch: Parents Say Soccer Officials Called Cops on Their Toddler Because He Was Too Good

Trump push to oust Omar faces historic Supreme Court test, but legal experts see ‘uncharted’ twist

An art museum to visit in sneakers

Democrats are likely to come up short in Florida. They’re still giving Republicans a scare

Federal judge blocks Trump DOJ threats against election workers ahead of 2026 midterms

California woman accused of killing trans son-in-law puts blame on husband in new docs: reports

Polish president forces his way into high court after dramatic return as supporters clash with police

Sheriff’s department gives update on Nancy Guthrie case 9 months after kidnapping

CEO of California-Based In-N-Out Burger Teases Major Expansion East

Oregon teacher who wrestled shotgun from school gunman shares emotional message after attack

Masked Invaders Stage Terrifying Armed Attack on CEO’s Family Home: Both Daughters Shot, Wife Struck with Hammer

Carney aims for June deal with EU to define ‘associate member’ status in bid to undercut US influence

EXCLUSIVE: ICE captures illegal alien at center of NYC manhunt after sanctuary city release

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.