U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Media Learns Would-Be Shooter Is Trans, Immediately Starts Using Biological Pronouns to Hide Trans ID, Blaming Men Instead

Repeat offender accused of shooting National Guard member has lengthy history with the law, records show

Former OJ Simpson attorney, longtime friend both support possibility of accomplice in 1994 murders

Trump renews push to rename New Mexico ‘New America,’ touts higher home values and incomes

Eagles QB Jalen Hurts Pulled for Season, Doctors Find Multiple Blood Clots in His Lungs

Smithsonian screening dispute puts museum’s commitment to diverse views on trial: ‘Right kind of Black?’

Reporter’s Notebook: Senate sneaks in one last political play before voters have their say

France’s massive intel failure sparks resignation offers amid days of rioting

Federal voter fraud arrests intensify in California days after DOJ warning

Rick Jackson to skip Trump campaign rally in Georgia

Court Set to Deliver Big Win to 70 Churches Seeking to Leave United Methodist Denomination

How a foreign government helped accused Saudi spy’s family flee US after OpenAI bug scandal

Violent far-left riots in France are ‘chilling warning’ for Americans at home, Mike Johnson says

WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Nears 50 Percent as Massie Loses More Ground

Trump aides fire back at press over Zacharia firing as they seek to limit damage

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.