U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

US Marshals Find 79 Missing and Endangered Children During Historic Operation

Breaking: US Responds to Failed Iran Strikes, Attacks Oil Tankers as Iran’s Economy Deteriorates

Lindsay Clancy juror admitted ‘reasonable doubt’ but still refused insanity verdict, foreperson says

Mamdani drops massive 9/11 records trove as old claims about Ground Zero come under fire

Karmelo Anthony photographed with guns as docs reveal alleged history of rage, threats and violence

Kansas Republicans buck Trump over threat to blacklist Canadian jets

Fetterman leans on unlikely GOP ally as Dems sharpen their knives over explosive report

House Oversight Committee Calls Out LA Mayor Karen Bass After She Dodges Testifying at Hearing

Popular Egyptian TV Host Sentenced to Death by Hanging in Drug Trafficking Case

Major blue state hospital pulls plug on controversial child transgender treatments after DOJ intervention

Reporter’s Notebook: Dem rebels expose cracks in Jeffries’ House leadership

Socialist Convention Panelists Declare Fitness ‘Body Fascism,’ Claim Capitalism is ‘Genociding Fat People’

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Announces Symbolic Change to Official Agency Seal

EXCLUSIVE: Newsom says Democrats ‘stopped showing up’ as California governor makes his case to the South

Eiffel Tower reopens following staff strike over female workers removed during Hindu leaders’ visit

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.