U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

WATCH: Pelosi dodges questions on husband’s new hit-and-run charge

Top Trump official makes new SAVE Act case to Republicans behind closed doors

Race-Baiting ESPN Personality Ryan Clark Learns He’s Fired During Live Broadcast

It’s Happening Again: Jews Greeted with Motor Oil, Fecal Material Outside Two NY Synagogues

Nancy Guthrie video may have been erased after FBI kept out for days, director says

Florida man arrested in IHOP restaurant after police say he stabbed a rideshare driver

Dem ‘Epstein class’ attack backfires as top candidates funded by Epstein-tied billionaire

Muslim Dem Candidate Exposes Flaw in Wokeness Allyship, Now Says She’s Getting Silenced Because She Didn’t Embrace LGBT Agenda

Cuba built covert network inside America through spies, activists and universities, State Dept alleges

Pentagon Releases Video of Latest Strikes on Iran After Trump Orders Revenge for Fallen US Troops

Two House races take center stage as conservative PAC launches multimillion-dollar Big Tech push

Jeff Clark’s yearslong disbarment fight tests reach of DC Bar over Trump DOJ

Trump’s GOP clout faces Arizona test with House majority, governor’s race at stake

DOJ’s creative solution to transgender prison case would move male inmates into specialized unit

DOJ opens probe into Harvard’s financial aid for alleged discrimination against American students

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.