U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Hochul primary challenger picks democratic socialist, once arrested for harassment, as running mate

DC Democrats Turn Their Backs on the Clintons: ‘They Bring Nothing But Baggage’

Government lawyer who told judge ‘this job sucks’ sent back to DHS

Democrats say Clintons’ agreement to testify undercuts subpoena push, won’t bring new Epstein answers

CBS News Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Episode After Contributor Appears in Epstein Files

Bill Gates Speaks Out on His Inclusion in Newly Released Epstein Documents

Noem vows criminal prosecution after catching alleged DHS ‘prolific leaker’

‘Melania’ Documentary Director Says ‘Divine Intervention’ Brought Him to the Surprise Hit Project

Anti-ICE activists plan to install 1,000 street blockades across Minneapolis

Putin and Trump plan dueling visits to China in battle to gain Xi’s favor

House GOP moves to block DC from stopping Trump tax cuts for tipped, overtime workers

Man accused of murdering National Guard member in DC pleads not guilty

Florida hospital worker allegedly stole wallet from 94-year-old patient, racked up $500 on credit cards

Breaking: Would-Be Trump Assassin Ryan Routh Learns His Sentence

Border czar Tom Homan calls anti-ICE roadblocks in Minneapolis a ‘joke’ after police chief disbands them

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.