U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Slain college student’s mother vows ‘fight for justice’ after illegal immigrant charged in Chicago killing

What? Toronto’s Foreign-Born Mayor Warns ICE to Stay Out of City – Where It Has No Authority

Watch: ICE Agents Working at Airport Give Whining Leftist the Exact Response He Deserves

Gas thief creeps into learning center, drains van serving students with disabilities

Jeffries declines to break with indicted Democrat after ethics panel’s guilty verdict

Southwest pilot aborts Hollywood Burbank landing because runway ‘wasn’t quite clear’: report

Hegseth Slashes ‘Faith Codes’ in Move to Make Chaplains the Spiritual Backbone of the US Military

Father of slain 20-year-old killed by illegal immigrant issues stark warning after Sheridan Gorman killing

Education Department Abandons Headquarters as Agency Heads for Total Extinction

Trans Tide Is Turning: Idaho Criminalizes Trans Use of Incorrect Bathrooms in Private Businesses

JD Vance says he was ‘obsessed’ with UFOs, believes aliens are actually ‘demons’

Notice Anything With NBC’s Headline About Dem Rep Getting Found Guilty By House Ethics Committee?

Op-Ed: This Is Newsom’s Biggest Problem – He’s Shallow

Climate Change Reparations Melted by New Court Ruling in Deep Blue State

Not Only Is Radical, Senile Maxine Waters Refusing to Retire at 87, She Could Chair Powerful Committee Come Next January

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.