U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Watch This Previously Unimaginable ‘Backward Finish’ Where Olympic Skier Wins by… Skiing Backwards Across Finish Line

Transit funding hits record highs as ridership languishes, new report questions return on billions

Guthrie Kidnapping Update: FBI Discovers Apparent Link to Kidnapping 2 Miles from Victim’s Home, DNA Results Already Coming In

Hiker dies near summit of New York’s tallest peak after slipping off trail

Rubio seals civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Hungary

Savannah Guthrie releases video marking two weeks since mom’s disappearance and more top headlines

Flashback: That Time Corey Feldman Warned The View About Hollywood Child Sex Abuse and Was Scolded for It

Nancy Mace proposes bill to make aliens deportable, inadmissible for animal cruelty

WaPo Eats Crow For Reporting White House Didn’t Announce Something Trump Literally Put On Truth Social

DOJ antitrust shake-up reflects effort to define ‘MAGA antitrust’ after Slater exit

Partial government shutdown drags on as DHS funding talks stall

Ken Paxton sues Dallas over alleged failure to fund police as required by Proposition U

Burglary theory in missing Guthrie case ‘ridiculously rare’ says law enforcement source

New Mexico mother accused of drowning newborn in portable toilet after giving birth

California mom convicted after son dies in hot car while mother got lip fillers: ‘Defendant chose her looks’

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.