U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Burglary theory in missing Guthrie case ‘ridiculously rare’ says law enforcement source

New Mexico mother accused of drowning newborn in portable toilet after giving birth

Department of War transports next-generation reactor in nuclear energy milestone

Schumer says Dems will fight voter ID push ‘tooth and nail,’ balks at DHS role in elections

Hillary Clinton clashes with Czech leader over Trump policies at Munich security conference

Woman allegedly steals bus from elementary school parking lot, goes on late night ride

The one sentence in Rubio’s Munich speech that revealed Trump’s red line for Europe

Campus Radicals Newsletter: Antifa-linked group tells students to mobilize, college students fake disabilities

SpaceX Launches New Crew to Space Station After Medical Evacuation

Media Whines About Irish Man Held by ICE, But Here’s Why He’s Really in Trouble

California Exodus Takes a Huge Leap Forward as Citizens Flock to Las Vegas to Avoid New Tax Hike

NBC Issues Apology for Calling Female Olympic Skier ‘She’

Newsom Gives $90 Million in ‘Emergency’ Funds to Planned Parenthood

US Kill Total on Drug Boats Hits 133 as Strike Takes Out 3 More ‘Narco-Terrorists’ in Caribbean

Trump announces $5 billion pledge in Gaza aid from Board of Peace members

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.