U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Schumer rips Senate Republicans for passing billions in ICE and Border Patrol funding in late-night vote

Democrat Abdul el Sayed clinches UAW support over primary rivals for Michigan Senate

Bessent flips script on shouting Democrat: ‘No wonder people are leaving’ his blue state

Dems Despise Normal, Masculine Men, Which is Why They Elevate People Like Tim Walz and Graham Platner

Watch: The Moment Unhinged Rep. Green Repeatedly Yells ‘Shut up!’ at Sec. Mullin in Middle of Hearing

Cops arrest 14-year-old accused of gunning down business school graduate on way to ballgame

Breaking: New Hiring Twice as High as Economists Expected in Gangbusters Jobs Report

2 States Aren’t Just Defying ‘Pride Month,’ They’re Replacing Pagan Celebration With ‘Nuclear Family Month’

Kennedy Center still committed to recognizing Trump while adhering to order to remove his name

The Octagon on the South Lawn: Trump’s UFC Freedom 250 White House extravaganza

Democrat bankrolling Graham Platner’s campaign ripped for downplaying abuse allegations and more top headlines

Republicans face ticking midterm clock as Iran fallout keeps pressure on gas prices

Trump’s personal legal team aims to clear hush money conviction

Dem senator bankrolling Platner’s campaign ripped for downplaying abuse allegations in bombshell report

The key strategy red states are using to lower housing costs revealed

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.