U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Two groups form in California governor’s race, but still no clear front-runner

Former Marvel actor working with Daily Wire for action movie produced by Ben Shapiro

Watch: The Priceless Look on This Sign Language Interpreter’s Face When She Has to Sign Hateful Islamic Verses She Probably Never Knew Existed

Denver mayor orders ICE agents detained if they ‘assault or shoot’ residents

Iran and US silent as negotiations in Geneva conclude without resolution

Travis County DA faces renewed ‘soft on crime’ criticism after career criminal charged with murder

Perfect Justice: Bill Gates Confesses to Russian Connection That Trump Was Falsely Accused of for Years

Nancy Guthrie neighbors’ Ring camera captures vehicles on possible route from crime scene

Family claims casino staff mistook veteran’s illness for intoxication, delaying care before his death

Retired Air Force Major Charged for Allegedly Training Chinese Military Pilots

New Texas Poll Is Out, and Stephen Colbert and Democratic Establishment Won’t Be Happy With It

Mamdani to meet with Trump in unannounced White House visit

China expands space footprint in Latin America, raising military alarms in America’s backyard

Biden FBI spied on Susie Wiles during Trump’s campaign

GOP pushes to hold sanctuary jurisdictions’ ‘feet to the fire’ in state where Laken Riley was killed

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.