U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

California immigration judge sues DOJ, alleging she was fired for being a registered Democrat, a woman over 40

Trump’s Psychedelic Push May Open a Door Christians Should Question

Schumer’s ‘No. 1 target’ says voters will see her Democrat Senate challenger as too extreme

Leftist Influencer’s Mangione Celebration Resurfaces After He Opposes Death Penalty for Child Murderer

DOJ dangles massive signing bonuses for lawyers ready to fight ‘lawless’ cities far beyond DC

Rubio heads to Rome amid Trump’s unpopular feud with Pope Leo

Dem representative admits to working with Mexico to sneak oil into Cuba, despite blockade

Merz ends first year as most unpopular German chancellor in post-war history

US Forces Strike as Iranian-Flagged Vessel Attempts to Violate Blockade

Cole Allen’s alleged Trump assassination attempt may have been driven by Iran war: intel report

DHS blasts Minnesota board for unanimously pardoning illegal immigrant convicted of 3 assaults

Man Charged for Allegedly Shooting at Secret Service Agents on JD Vance Motorcade Route

Cory Booker Admits Dems Are Coming for Supreme Court if They Win Midterms

Obama branded ‘classless moron’ for AG jab at Trump as ‘wingman’ comments resurface

Dem House candidate faces authenticity questions after kitchen table ad omits $1.6M estate

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.