U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Democrats Push to Fly Spy Drones Over Your Property to Enforce Their Green Agenda, Punish Regulation Violators

Detroit judge, 3 others charged in alleged scheme to steal thousands from vulnerable and incapacitated people

Unearthed photo of Swalwell meeting with top CCP official raises alarm bells: ‘Very disturbing’

Lindsey Graham Holds Up Trump-Backed Bill to Crack Down on Sanctuary Cities

Clinton Contempt Vote Set for Next Week: Will Justice Be Served?

Epstein Helped Fund Lavish Lifestyle for Former Obama WH Counsel Who Gave Him Legal Advice

Salman Rushdie refuses to be ‘diverted’ by terrorism after surviving near-fatal stabbing attack

From Obama award to Minnesota op: Why Trump tapped Tom Homan for on-the-ground crackdown

House GOP majority on the brink as all-Democrat Texas special congressional election underway

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison Set to Testify Before Congress About Massive Fraud Allegations

Conservative group blasts LinkedIn for removing pro-ICE post, labeling it ‘hateful’

Famed filmmaker presses Democrats to put ‘citizen-led’ presidential primary first

He’s Not Joking: Jim Acosta Claims Don Lemon Was Arrested Because He’s Black

New Jersey governor to launch portal for uploading videos of ICE tactics: ‘They have not been forthcoming’

LAPD arrests violent agitators after protests erupt outside federal detention center in Los Angeles

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.