U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Trump Reveals Botched Attempt to Send Guns to the Iranian People: ‘I’m Very Upset’

Angel Dad Calls Out His State’s Dem Senators for Ignoring His Daughter’s Killing by Previously Deported Illegal

Israeli justice minister says government should ignore high court ruling on wartime protests

Trump touts drop in egg prices at White House Easter event

Trump reveals Iran made ‘significant proposal’ after ultimatum, but ‘not good enough’

Watch: Savannah Guthrie Returns to ‘Today’ Show, Pays Tribute to Missing Mother with Outfit

American woman missing after husband says she fell overboard, swept to sea during Bahamas boat trip: police

Power Company Faces Legal Fight For Making Too Much Energy

Newsom’s California rail project now expected to cost $126B, official admits, with still no tracks laid

Israel hits South Pars natural gas field as Trump deadline looms

Children of Illegal Aliens Linked to Attempted Bombing at U.S. Air Force Base

Martinez: Why President Trump’s War On Fraud Exposes National Scandal

Ceasefire proposal could reopen key oil route amid US-Iran tensions and more top headlines

Behind ‘No Kings’ St. Paul protest: $250K production machine equal to a Def Leppard concert

Lindsey Graham turns ire toward rivals at home amid Iran and DHS shutdown fallout

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.