U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Mexican Consulates Worry That Trump Admin Review Could Lead To Closure

California 22nd Congressional district primary results: Rep. David Valadao advances to runoff

Hilton, Becerra, in the lead with votes still being counted in battle for California governor

California 11th district primary results: Wiener advances to general election to succeed Pelosi

South Dakota governors race remains up in the air as GOP contest goes to runoff

Supreme Court allows Alabama GOP-backed congressional map for midterms

Trump-endorsed Feenstra concedes to MAHA-backed Lahn in GOP governor primary upset

DOJ expands indictment against SPLC, alleging $4M secretly funneled to KKK and extremist groups

FBI charges 35 in West Virginia drug and firearms operation, launches nationwide summer crime initiative

Missing GOP congressman reveals he’s ‘more energized than ever’ to return to Washington

Bomb threat standoff at Bakersfield Chase Bank continues as negotiators work to release hostages

WATCH: Dem senators excuse Platner’s conduct at crisis huddle with embattled Maine candidate

Trump-backed candidate ‘confident’ Republicans will have great night in California: ‘Very excited’

Jill Biden Claims Joe Would Have Beaten Trump If Democrats Hadn’t Forced Him Out

Trump Signs Modified AI Executive Order Behind Closed Doors

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.