U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Rubio says US has no plan to use force in Venezuela — but warns ‘imminent threat’ could change that

FBI agents search election hub in Fulton County, Georgia

Op-Ed: How Pro-Life Republican Leaders Are Delaying the End of Abortion

Watch: As Chants Ring Out About Lynching Kristi Noem, Clueless Lib Protesters Realize to Their Horror Who They’re in Bed With

Anheuser-Busch praised for patriotic Budweiser Super Bowl ad after Bud Light controversy

Child Sex Abuse Material Made with AI Surges to Shocking New Levels

Tom Homan Issues Statement After Meeting with Tim Walz and Jacob Frey

Ilhan Omar backed by House Republicans after Minnesota town hall attack

Vandals hit Yosemite National Park with graffiti on boulder, more

Privacy concerns, discrimination, doctor pushback: the compliance traps looming behind sex-separated sports

Trump threatens attack on Iran worse than ‘Midnight Hammer’ with military buildup in the region

90-year-old woman who wandered outside during winter storm among 10 dead in New York City

Trump endorses Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy’s son-in-law for Congress

Xi Jinping’s purge of generals sets grim tone for annual Communist Party meetings

Democrats request money while consoling after Minneapolis deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.