U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Former Louisiana mayor gets jail time for sex with son’s teen friend at house party

Cardi B’s reaction to Karmelo Anthony verdict draws millions of views and fierce criticism

Black Actor Shoots Down Having a ‘Woke’ James Bond: ‘That’s Not What They Like’

US Blocks Somali World Cup Referee from Entering the Country, and There’s Nothing FIFA Can Do About It

California’s 6th Congressional District primary result: Kevin Kiley will face Democrat Richard Pan

US Navy Sailor Admits to Killing Fellow Sailor in Barracks

Sen Tom Cotton urges DOJ to probe Chinese bid to ‘kneecap’ American AI

Bill Gates faces House investigators over Jeffrey Epstein ties

Ron DeSantis Calls Out Fellow Republicans for an AI Blunder That Left the Door Wide Open for Democrats

Europe’s $116B fighter jet ‘failure’ raises fresh doubts about ability to defend itself without US

ActBlue chief heads to Capitol Hill hot seat as donor fraud probe intensifies

Judicial turf war ignites over DOJ investigations into transgender drugs and surgeries for children

Top takeaways from the primary elections in Maine and South Carolina: ‘Movement about us’

Judge blocks Alabama’s nitrogen gas execution method, rules it is unconstitutionally cruel

Trump-endorsed candidate will face top GOP target in Nevada House district

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.