U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

CNN Analyst Breaks Down the Numbers for Dems, Reveals Their Own Voters Can’t Stand Them

Blue States Scrambling to Circumvent SCOTUS Ruling, Save Censorship of Gender Counseling

Billboard trolling Dale Warner goes viral after his murder conviction in wife Dee’s case

Watch: Inept Texas Judge Blasted After Camera Catches Him Cursing Kind Computer Tech – Now His Nasty Emails Demanding Respect Have Leaked, Too

One of a Kind Video: Kid Rock Uses Apache Hovering Behind His House to Torment Gavin Newsom

Tax day is next week: Avoid these 5 common mistakes that can cost you money

Trump admin urges restoring ballroom construction in emergency motion: ‘Time is of the essence’

Philadelphia man stabs Planet Fitness worker after getting banned from gym: police

Inside the daring rescue of airman behind enemy lines: How CIA assisted with ‘deception campaign’

Trump Admin to Investigate School District Accused of Putting Girls in Danger Over ‘Gender Identity’ Policy

Ex-Fox News Regular Suggests Trump’s US Is Beginning to Mirror North Korea

Trump vows US will strike Iran’s power plants, bridges if Strait of Hormuz is not reopened

Art heist targeting million-dollar masterpieces exposes blind spots in museum defenses, expert warns

Federal judge blocks Trump push to collect race-based admissions data

Scott Jennings Mocks Dems Over Radical ‘No Kings’ Rallies

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.