U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Trump admin recalling around 30 ambassadors as part of State Dept realignment, official confirms

JD Vance turns Turning Point speech into midterm battle cry — and a preview of 2028

Russian general assassinated in Moscow car bombing

Watch: JD Vance Gets Fiery Response from AmFest Crowd After Declaring the U.S. ‘a Christian Nation’

Shocking Video: Steelers Wide Receiver Punches Lions Fan in the Face in Middle of Sunday Game

Florida teens to be tried as adults in brutal killing of 14-year-old girl

Schumer accuses DOJ of breaking the law over redacted Epstein files

Trump admin pausing all off shore wind project construction due to national security concerns

Convicted killer kept in police oversight role as city council dismisses concerns over public safety

Colorado governor accuses Trump of playing ‘political games’ after FEMA denies disaster requests

US Catholic bishops president says deportations instilling ‘fear’ in ‘widespread manner’: ‘Concerns us all’

Mock funeral held for the penny at Lincoln Memorial as 230-year coin production ends

DHS responds after reports CISA chief allegedly failed polygraph for classified intel access

Former classmate says suspect in Brown, MIT killings was ‘socially awkward’ and ‘angry’ during college years

DOJ restores Trump photo to Epstein files after determining no victims depicted

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.