U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Rubio Announced Major Shift in Foreign Aid Strategy Ahead of Venezuela Moves

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell Under Criminal Investigation

Seattle order to stop drug arrests ‘creating havoc’ for people fending off addicts surviving on theft: expert

LA protesters swarm U-Haul truck that drove through anti-Iranian regime gathering

Inside the lightning US strike that overwhelmed Venezuela’s defenses and seized Maduro

Alleged J6 Pipe Bomber Pleads Not Guilty After Reportedly Saying He Did it to Defend Biden’s Election Win

J6 Officer Praised By the Media Appears to Call for Violence Against ICE Agents

US raid in Venezuela signals deterrence to adversaries on three fronts, experts say

Meet Aaron Day, the 2016 spoiler who could sink Senate GOP hopes in New Hampshire

Rand Paul says Trump’s threat to bomb Iran ‘is not the answer’: Not the ‘job of the American government’

San Antonio ends its abortion travel fund after new state law, legal action

Los Angeles wildfire recovery enters second year as frustration and uncertainty linger

Smithsonian replaces Trump portrait display, strips Jan. 6 and impeachment references from accompanying text

Trump says Greenland’s defense is ‘two dog sleds’ as he pushes for US acquisition of territory

Wild video shows federal agents detaining 2 men at Minnesota gas station as agitators gather

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.