U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Kid Rock Opens Up About What Inspired His New Gospel Album, and It’s Quite the Story

CBS Tried to Trash Trump Again, Now They’re Facing Another Multimillion Suit, This Time from a 15-Year-Old They Trashed

Obama’s star power gets a reality check from Black voters in crucial Senate race: ‘It’s a turn-off’

Biden judge rejects Obama CIA chief’s legal bid against Trump over one key problem

Bryan Kohberger fights to remove judge who called him ‘worst of the worst,’ questioned his honesty

Former University of Kentucky cheerleader sentenced to 10 years in prison for infant’s death

Watch: Dem Nominee Troy Jackson Tells Sen. Susan Collins to ‘Shut Up’ as Heckler Causes Debate Chaos

Breaking: Katie Zacharia Out as White House Press Secretary

Black civic group blasts Talarico campaign over canceled event: ‘Deeply disappointed’

Americans back Trump’s decision against livestreaming Nidal Hasan’s firing squad execution

Where to Get American-Made Ivermectin at a Price You Can’t Beat

Fox News Co-Host Accuses Kimberly Guilfoyle of NSFW Behavior, Claims She Was Guided by ‘Unrelenting Narcissism’

Democrats call for gun control after Oregon school shooter reportedly uses shotgun purchased by his mother

Pro-Israel Democrats, once seemingly politically invincible, are on the defensive

Rising Trump administration pressure on Cuba divides Hill Democrats

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.