U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

President Trump Nominates Franklin Graham’s Daughter for Key Religious Freedom Position

Nancy Mace Wants Lindsay Clancy Executed, And Says ‘It Should Be Public’

Senate moves to rein in college sports ‘Wild West’ with sweeping new rules for players, schools

Democrat rebels defy Jeffries to hand GOP critical win just before midterms

Kash Patel says ‘no evidence’ Trump shooter Thomas Crooks spoke to anyone but his parents

Oct. 7 families release dossier blaming Netanyahu for massacre

Historic: FBI Captures All 10 Fugitives on ‘Most Wanted’ List in Trump’s Second Term

Newsom’s Harris gamble: Clearing the field or betting she won’t run?

Mainstream Media Attempts to Cancel Star Texas QB Arch Manning for His Comments About Female ESPN Reporter

AG Blanche unveils federal charges against 160 defendants in pandemic relief sweep

Seven noncitizens charged in North Texas election-integrity investigation

Pentagon reveals secret space weapons are already in orbit — but won’t say what they do

WATCH: ‘Lifelong Democrat’ admits she is ‘ashamed’ of party after son killed in illegal immigrant crash

Karl Rove to Vote for Pro-Trans Dem After GOP Candidate Shares Texas Student Section Pic

Watch: Chiefs Used a Clever Bit of ‘Gamesmanship’ During TV Timeouts to Gain an Edge Over the Broncos

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.