U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Senate Candidate Punched in the Face During Anti-Islam Demonstration in Dearborn, Michigan

‘Worst Candidate Possible’: Jasmine Crockett Excoriated After Embarrassing ‘Jeffrey Epstein’ Gaffe

Fox News Poll: Voters say White House is doing more harm than good on economy

Mia Cathell testifies on anti-ICE uprisings at Senate judiciary hearing

‘Stone-cold liar’: Top House Dem lashes out at Comer for accusing him of soliciting Epstein donations

Top Senate Democrat pans Chuy García for retirement succession scheme

Epstein files likely to be incomplete due to active DOJ inquiry in New York

Conservative Firebrand Wayne Allyn Root Files Whopping $100 Million Suit Against Facebook, Google, X for COVID Censorship, Gross Civil Rights Violations

Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Luigi Mangione’s Pre-Trial Clothing Request

Trump explains trans sports controversy to Saudi investors who he says ‘don’t do a lot of transitioning’

Dem senator divides party over controversial pardon proposal: ‘I don’t think it makes sense’

Teen suspect in custody after Howard University homecoming shooting leaves 5 wounded: police

‘Ms. Halligan was not a puppet’: DOJ says Trump’s dislike of Comey isn’t grounds to toss case

Legal Expert: Rosie O’Donnell Just Put Herself in Jeopardy of Major Legal Action from Trump

Chicago person of interest in train fire attack has 22 prior arrests, was freed by judge: report

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.