U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

ICE Houston touts over 400 illegal alien child sex offenders arrested during Trump’s first year back in office

Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve meets GOP senator holding up his confirmation

Shots Fired at US Consulate in Canada in ‘Unacceptable Act of Violence’

Jackson-Kavanaugh tensions surface in candid exchange over Supreme Court ‘shadow docket’

Have you seen these people? One of them might be your next president

Mainstream Media Headlines Use Subtle Spin to Hide Truth About ISIS-Inspired NYC Attack

Gas prices surge, pinching Americans and handing the GOP a new midterm headache

Tennessee lawmakers push bill that could make them, and their donors, richer by triggering CVS closures

Trump Promises to Hit Iran ’20 Times Harder’ if it Doesn’t Comply with Demands

U.S. Military Took Out Iranian Who Was Planning to Kill Trump

Longtime House Dem swats down attack ad from millennial challenger: ‘I trust the voters’

‘Serious concerns’: GOP sounds alarm on taxpayer funds going to ‘high risk’ universities vulnerable to CCP

Trump warns Iran faces strikes ‘twenty times harder’ if nation refuses to heed warning and more top headlines

Trump Keeps Gifting Officials and Friends a Particular Brand of Shoes

Schools boost antisemitism grades in ADL report but students say hostility persists

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.