U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Connecticut Dems Facing Legal Trouble in Desperate Attempt to Ban Glocks

Sanders says Platner has the ‘guts’ to fight billionaires despite growing scandal pileup

Ohio Gov. DeWine Revokes AI Data Center Tax Break Measures

Will the Force ever awaken?

High-profile convicts lobby for rumored Trump pardons ahead of 250th anniversary

Overall success: The small-town appeal of vintage workwear

Rubio braces for Hill grilling as Republicans join bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers

From reality TV to city hall? Trump-backed Spencer Pratt soars in LA mayor race as Californians vote

Trump makes late-night endorsements in six states ahead of Tuesday primaries, including California

Florida beach toll booth worker killed after driver rams structure before getting stuck in sand, sheriff says

Jared Kushner’s overseas luxury resort project faces anti-corruption investigation amid violent protests

Senate Democrats offer little support as Platner faces new sexting controversy: ‘Staying out of it’

Texas teens accused of using dating apps to lure young men into violent robberies that left one victim shot

Meet the Left’s Merchant of Hate

The Truth About Genocide in America: What North American Indians Were Doing to Each Other When Europeans Arrived

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.