U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Denver man found dead at bottom of national park canyon beneath steep drop-offs

US offers $20 million reward for information on Iran’s nuclear program

Trump highlights NASA nuclear-powered Mars spacecraft mission planned for 2028

SPLC was once suspected of more crimes than current charges show

Armed Illegal, Freed in Biden Era, Detained at White House

Meghan Markle’s Father Could Die in Prison If He’s Convicted on Child Porn Charges

Three States Carry Out Executions on the Same Day in Rare Occurrence

Newly Elected Congressional Democrat Due to Face Felony Charge in Court

Netanyahu says US aid cut makes way for ‘mutual investment’ amid unclear plans for military cooperation

Ron Johnson presses to delay Senate GOP leadership elections: ‘Political malpractice’

Secret Service arrests armed Venezuelan migrant near White House over alleged Trump assassination threat

Far-Left Media Outlet Abruptly Folds, Causing Conservatives to Dig Up Some of Its Most Insane Headlines

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what happens next on Capitol Hill

Trump’s move from Wiles to Miller signals major tactical shift for governing without Congress

Watch: NBA Players Can’t Contain Themselves When Singer Desecrates Anthem with LGBT Flag

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.