U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Clintons agree to testify after House threatens contempt in Jeffrey Epstein probe

LAPD Chief Refuses to Enforce Gavin Newsom’s Crackdown on ICE Agents: ‘It Doesn’t Make Any Sense’

House GOP majority shrinks to just one vote as Johnson swears in new House Democrat

Trump and India PM Modi Reach Historic Trade Agreement, Includes Ending Importation of Russian Oil

Grammys blasted as ‘anti-China political tool’ after Dalai Lama wins audiobook award

House Democrat Appears Hundreds of Times in New Epstein Documents

Trump raises ‘nationalized voting’ idea in Bongino’s return podcast debut

FLASHBACK VIDEO: The Barack Obama Video That Anti-ICE Dems Want Buried Forever and That Trump Should Run on TV 24/7

Matt Mahan sets himself apart from crowded California field by criticizing Newsom

Trump ‘ask us’ doctrine explained as protests rage in far left states

White House fires back at critics calling Trump’s massive arch ‘too big’

Judge dismisses DOJ judicial misconduct complaint against James Boasberg

Schumer nukes GOP push for ‘Jim Crow-era’ voter ID laws in Trump-backed shutdown package

Celebrities Try to Lecture Americans with Flood of Anti-ICE Virtue Signalling at Grammys

Turning Point USA launches rival halftime show with star-studded lineup as NFL faces Super Bowl backlash

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.