U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Raman overtakes Spencer Pratt in razor-thin race, AP count shows, but race remains uncalled

Spencer Pratt falls behind Nithya Raman in LA mayoral race after latest vote update

Video captures fireworks exploding from burning trailer that shut down Interstate 75

Multiple people stabbed near Penn Station, leaving one seriously injured as investigation continues

US Forces Shoot Down Iranian Missiles Targeting Gulf Neighbors

Erika Kirk Shows Incredible Poise, Class After Heckler Screams Vile Insult

Trump Makes Large Investment in Specialty Restaurant Chain

Fast Food Manager Arrested for Disgusting Action Toward Customer’s Food

At 82, Marilyn Burns is still defining the American small business dream

Finland’s NATO nerves: A country on Russia’s doorstep wonders about the alliance’s future

Australia Has Launched $1.4B Lawsuit Against 3M Citing “Forever Chemicals”

Spencer Pratt’s runner-up edge over Democrat Raman down to 1%, few thousand ballots

‘Don’t let me be the guy that’s not funny anymore’: Jeff Foxworthy opens up on his possibly final special

The World Is Learning Faster Than Ever: The Bible Said It Would

Unease and hostility meets defiant support as Maine residents grapple with Graham Platner allegations

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.