U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Blue state governor candidate claims he ‘met Satan in person’ in resurfaced podcast episode

Mamdani gives influencers special access as Signal use raises records-law questions

Democrats in Close Midterm Races Keep Telling Kamala Harris to Stay Away

Lindsay Clancy Fans Start Sick TikTok Trend Pretending to Kill Their Babies

Minneapolis apartment shooting suspect was facing eviction: report

Powerful union leader backs Republican in key Senate showdown

Maduro claims immunity, asks judge to dismiss drug-trafficking charges against him and his wife

When gunman forced his way into Virginia elementary school, superintendent says lockdown procedures worked

Gloria Steinem, outspoken feminist leader, dies at 92

Newsom’s South Carolina trip doubles as test of Democrats’ rebuilding strategy

High School Football Hotshots Snub Opponents in Pre-Game Handshake, Get Taught a Lesson on the Field

Deported Milo Yiannopoulos Makes Predictable Turn to the Left, Decries Immigration Enforcement, How ‘Institutionalized the Brutality’ in US Is

2028 Dem hopeful’s longtime ally exposed for deep ties to CCP officials: ‘Good friends’

GOP mail-in voting proposal could impact millions of Americans ahead of midterms

DOJ threatens to cut billions in welfare funding from states for failing to report illegal migrants

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.