U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Kentucky trooper, father of 3, gunned down during traffic stop as suspect captured after manhunt

Lindsay Clancy holdout juror asks for one thing in new video after mistrial drama

Trump CMS faces bipartisan pushback over Medicare proposal tied to Biden-era drug pricing law

AI Companies and Major Unions Join Together for New Data Center Push

Sarah Huckabee Sanders Criticized Over ‘Welfare-To-Work Requirement’ Video That Depicts Young White Male as the Problem

Dem Senate nominee breaks silence after Susan Collins’ office was vandalized with vulgar message

Department of Education Officially Axes Biden’s ‘Illegal Title IX Rewrite’

‘Insulting’: Ex-Trump official’s ‘dishonest’ campaign ad triggers conservative revolt

Huckabee Announces Update on New US Embassy in Jerusalem Project

Fake Rabbi Catfishes Gaza Propaganda Photographer, Offers to Make His Dream Come True, Then Ruins It with Hilarious Reveal

GOP Sen. Susan Collins’ Office Vandalized with Vulgar Message Amid Tight Midterm Race

El-Sayed questions ethics of football in resurfaced audio

WATCH: NYPD bodycam captures tense standoff after Bank of America exec fatally stabbed in Times Square

Lindsay Clancy’s push to investigate holdout juror could be paused as defense, prosecutors agree to adjourn

Protester storms DC party, flips off crowd as ‘USA!’ chants erupt amid Trump’s AI push

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.