U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

GOING BROKE? The Washington Post Is Bleeding Money, With Losses Exceeding $100 Million in 2025

Poll: America’s Support for Israel Plunges as More Independents and Democrats Sympathize with Palestinians

US and Israel launch ‘preemptive’ attack against Iran

WATCH: Dem lawmaker makes surprising admission about border as others trash Trump’s SOTU ‘lies’

BREAKING REPORT: Israel Strikes Iran, US Involved

Richard Cox derails sex offender case, once again

North Carolina woman arrested nearly 50 years after baby found dead in trash bag at landfill

Biden accuses Trump of erasing history and squandering US leadership role on global stage: ‘Dark days’

ICE blasts Washington mayor over directive restricting immigration enforcement

Trump floats Ted Cruz for Supreme Court, jokes he’d get ‘100%’ bipartisan vote to ‘get him out of there’

Dem Washington House majority leader apologizes for being ‘impaired’ during budget hearing

Man accused of spraying anti-ICE graffiti at Oklahoma Capitol is registered child sex offender; charges filed

Hegseth bans military from attending Princeton, Columbia, other elite universities: ‘Wokeness and weakness’

Trump picks up Whataburger for Air Force One and jokes about being poisoned after Texas speech

Luigi Mangione escapes federal death penalty after federal prosecutors decline to appeal judge’s ruling

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.