U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

In Just One Diocese, 7 Catholic Churches Are Canceling Sunday Mass Entirely as Minnesota’s Self-Destruction Continues

Op-Ed: Sparing Our Children from a Nuclear Iran

Luigi Mangione plea talks raise showdown over Brian Thompson murder trial

9/11 families push to ban Mamdani from 25th anniversary remembrance over ‘hostile’ record

Thune pours cold water Trump’s call to axe August recess for SAVE America Act

Illegal immigrant accused of murdering college student dials into hearing from hospital bed

Trans influencer breaks silence after Trump’s comparison to CNN anchor at WHCA Dinner

Police Searching for Second Suspect After Deadly Shooting at Seattle Festival

Episcopal Church Headquarters Forced to Evacuate After Nearby Manhattan Tower Sagged

‘Shame on you’: Sherrill knew voter-roll bombshell was coming when she called Trump a liar, DOJ official says

Trump demands Thune keep Senate in session until SAVE America Act passes

McConnell ‘not yet cleared’ to leave rehab to return to Congress

How the Big Beautiful Bill became law: Trump locks horns with GOP lawmakers

Pentagon Official Is Out After He Told James O’Keefe on Undercover ‘Gay Date’ He Planned to Subvert Trump’s Policies

World’s Dumbest Rapper Arrested for Fraud, But Satanic Discovery and Live ‘Sacrifice’ Found at Home Are Far Worse

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.