U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Trump national security blueprint declares ‘era of mass migration is over,’ targets China’s rise

Mandela Barnes jumps into Wisconsin governor race — but baggage from his 2022 Senate bid follows

Trump administration balances US support for Saudi Arabia and Israel

New Utah map could leave four House GOP members scrambling for three seats

Tom Stoppard, 1937-2025

CBS Continues Overhaul Under Bari Weiss, as Key Anchor Goes ‘Rogue’: Report

Young Americans Are Getting Absolutely Fed Up with the American Duopoly: Poll

Trump taps new architect to reshape White House as $300M ballroom build accelerates

Tom Homan fumes at protester who called him racist during clash at TPUSA event: ‘Grow a backbone’

Mamdani breaks with Adams, vows NYC will stop clearing homeless encampments in January

Arkansas county jail becomes major ICE pipeline as arrests surge under Trump crackdown

Mamdani says NYPD commissioner apologized after her brother called him ‘enemy’ of the Jewish people at gala

Harvard professor detained by ICE after Boston synagogue shooting, agrees to voluntarily leave US

Democrats’ anger at federal government hit record high just days before shutdown: Pew poll

DHS arrests dozens of illegal immigrants within 24 hours of launching New Orleans operation

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.