U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

UN postpones US human rights review after boycott

Explosive House report exposes failures it says allowed Epstein’s abuse to continue for years

GOP lawmaker ousts fellow Republican in gerrymandered California district

When the Pharmacies Are Empty and the Clinic Is Closed, Here’s the Kit Americans Keep Ready

Texas’ Democrat governor-elect has vowed to impose ‘emergency’ day-one policy and more top headlines

‘SNL’ writer’s sister vanished — now her boyfriend and rival face charges in deadly love triangle

Trump defends Pentagon chief as Massie targets him: ‘Hegseth should be praised, not impeached’

Reporter’s Notebook: House leadership up for grabs as GOP reckons with devastating losses

Thune forges ahead with leadership elections despite calls for post-midterm reckoning

Somali daycare CEO tied to fraud scandal wins Minnesota House seat

Trump calls on Senate to confirm remaining 25 judges amid Arkansas senator friction

Trump says deportation push hasn’t put ‘same pressure’ on farm workers, hotel staff: ‘Not even close’

Red counties with data center projects swung away from GOP in midterms, analysis finds

Trump DOJ shores up anti-abortion groups’ support amid bid to salvage $1.8 billion Planned Parenthood lawsuit

Official Who Waged War on DEI Out at DOJ

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.