U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Graphic: Another Muslim Activist Freaks Out, Demanding We Confine Our Dogs According to the Will of Allah

Video Emerges Showing Mitch McConnell Taken to Hospital After Cardiac Arrest – Report

Peter Navarro seeks ‘precedent for years to come’ with renewed contempt fight

Trump administration expands ‘Product of USA’ label as push for American-raised beef grows

Mamdani official’s planned meeting with Iran envoy shut down by State Department

Iran will target Israel if US continues strikes after ceasefire collapses, official warns

Illegal Alien Child Predator Pardoned by Tim Walz Deported After Marco Rubio Intervenes

Alert: Dem Sen. Fetterman and GOP Sen. McCormick Launch Joint Fundraising Project, Adding to Speculation Fetterman Will Switch Parties Soon

Mamdani’s wife co-hosts luxe Muslim retreat casting Virgin Mary as ‘Palestinian woman’ under occupation

Trump says he’s Iran’s ‘No. 1’ target as renewed conflict raises assassination fears

8 indicted in planned sniper attack at White House UFC 250 event, DOJ says

National Guard shooting suspect in ‘dire,’ ‘self-inflicted’ health condition after refusing to eat: filing

Trump’s popularity among Israelis fades after Iran MOU

Could the Nevada governor’s race outcome run through Canada

Sanders under fire for propping up Platner as Dems torch his toxic endorsement ‘pattern’

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.