U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

CIA Accused of Raiding Tulsi Gabbard’s Office Seizing JFK, MKUltra Documents Set for Declassification

Trump’s upbeat China message collides with deepening Beijing rivalry

China rolls out red carpet for Trump as Xi meeting tests trade, Taiwan tensions

AG aims to retry Alex Murdaugh ‘quickly’; both sides enter courtroom chess match with each other’s game plans

California death row inmates watching porn on taxpayer-funded tablets, evading security controls: report

It never ends: GOP moves to fund border, Democrats blast Trump spending

Howard Lutnick testified he saw Epstein’s massage table as ‘sexual in nature’ during 2005 visit

Video: Ex-Trans Speaker Postpones TPUSA Speech as Antifa ‘Militia … on Cross-Sex Hormones’ Threatens Violence Cops Weren’t Prepared for

Vance turns up heat on states with federal cash threat over Medicaid fraud crackdown

JD Vance’s Fraud Task Force Makes California Pay $1.3 Billion Price for Defrauding Taxpayers

Poll: Thomas Massie Trailing Trump-Backed Primary Challenger After Leading Big Just Weeks Ago

CIA Furious as Active Agent Testifies on Fauci’s Enormous Role in COVID ‘Cover-Up’

Children’s book author sentenced for husband’s poisoning death as judge calls her ‘too dangerous’

Arrest of gang member convicted of murder puts Dem state’s sanctuary policies on blast

Red-State Governor Cancels Special Redistricting Session for Congressional Seats

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.