U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Mother’s tip helped unravel White House UFC drone plot: Affidavit

Lawmakers demand answers after NIH scientists charged in monkeypox smuggling conspiracy

MLB Reprimands Christian Players Who Took a Stand Against ‘Pride Night’

Todd Blanche earns attorney general bid endorsement from law enforcement alliance ahead of confirmation

Trump Says Israel Is Fighting ‘Too Long, and Too Many People Are Being Killed’

Hungary changes constitution to ban Viktor Orban reelection as Peter Magyar prepares to oust president

Report links anti-Christian extremism and ‘assassination culture’ to alleged plot against Erika Kirk

Luigi Mangione supporter working for far-left DC mayoral candidate likened to Mamdani

South Carolina personal trainer goes missing, last spotted walking toward wooded area

Watch: JD Vance Explains How Iran Deal Is ‘Fundamentally’ Different Than Obama’s JCPOA

Vance shares how he’s gearing up for lion’s den debut on ‘The View’

Trump’s Iran deal sparks GOP demands for vote as Congress remains in the dark

NC School Pays Dearly After Admin Wildly Bullied Student Who Wrote Sweet Message About Charlie Kirk

FBI thwarts explosive drone attack against UFC Freedom 250 fight

Trump says he had a ‘very good meeting’ with Zelensky at G7

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.