U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Dem lawmaker sparks online firestorm after saying Iryna Zarutska mural doesn’t align with city’s values

Former San Francisco Human Rights Commission leader accused of ‘self-dealing,’ public corruption

Ground Stops Ordered for DC-Area Airports

Vance: White House Plans to ‘Go After’ Ilhan Omar for Alleged Immigration Fraud

NYC Dem, Hochul aide under investigation over alleged migrant shelter bribes

Democrats pounce on $4 a gallon gas, blame Trump’s Iran war for ‘broken promise’

Woman Tries Getting Birth Certificate, SS Card, and Marriage License to See if Dems Are Honest – Says She Caught Them Lying Through Their Teeth

Trump Seethes After France Blocks American Military Planes: ‘The USA Will Remember’

Hegseth reveals covert visit to troops fighting in Operation Epic Fury

Trump’s proposed presidential library revealed as towering Miami skyscraper in striking new video

Outrage grows as ICE detainer ignored in connection to killing of 24-year-old mother and more top headlines

Scoop: House Speaker Mike Johnson’s allies unleash $10M campaign to spotlight Trump tax cuts

Florida county’s Democratic Party chair accused of hitting man in head with bullhorn at ‘No Kings’ protest

Trump reveals first look at presidential library in Miami

Teacher of the Year finalist gets 14 years for sexual relationship with student she kept contacting

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.