U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

DHS shutdown explained: Who works without pay, what happens to airports and disaster response

Trump’s $12B rare earth plan targets China as experts warn US is ‘one crisis away’

Walz proposes $10M business relief package as Republicans cry ‘new avenue for fraud’ in Minnesota

Shooting at South Carolina State University leaves two dead

Puerto Rico governor signs law recognizing unborn babies as human beings

Over 700 arrested amid major gang and drug crackdown in Louisiana

Sanctuary policies let alleged child predator roam free until DHS made Portland, Oregon, airport arrest

Over 1.5 million illegal aliens with deportation orders in US, ICE director reveals

Arizona sheriff blocking FBI from key evidence in escalating Guthrie case: source

Obama Judge Just Knowingly Released 4 Violent Illegals – 1 Ethiopian Pedophile and 3 Cuban Murderers, According to ICE – Onto US Streets

Canadian Police Double Down on Respecting Trans Killer’s Gender Identity, Will Use Preferred Pronouns

Newsom stop in key presidential primary state sparks more 2028 speculation

Noem slams Dems blocking DHS funding bill citing TSA, FEMA, Coast Guard: ‘I hope they come to their senses’

FBI reveals new evidence, including backpack details, in Nancy Guthrie disappearance, doubles reward to $100K

‘Proudly Fixing This Stupid Feature’: Obama-Era Regulation Gets Axed by Trump Admin

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.