U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

‘Protecting Child Rapists and Killers’: ICE Lists Off Illegals They’ve Caught as Liberal Protests Rage On

California gubernatorial hopefuls have a Gavin Newsom problem

Lindsey Graham meets with Mossad director during trip to Israel

Unearthed Data Makes Pennsylvania’s Puberty Blocker Payouts Look Even Sketchier

Trump’s ‘first resort’ use of military has succeeded but it has its limits

Rand Paul says US in ‘active war’ with Venezuela: ‘I still hope it works out for the best’

Viral video shows ICE agent telling agitators they’re disrupting arrest of child sex offender in Minnesota

ICE says 2 demonstrators were arrested in Minnesota for allegedly assaulting officers

Anti-ICE mob storms Minnesota church over pastor’s alleged ties to immigration enforcement

Nancy Pelosi faces social media backlash over behavior at Bob Weir tribute event

Newsom defies Trump administration, declares free parks for MLK Day

Kurdish SDF forces agree to ceasefire with Syrian government after offensive

Grieving father says daughter’s death by illegal alien shows cost of sanctuary policies

Texas couple labeled fake ‘Chip and Joanna Gaines’ admits $5M dream home renovation scam

Wife of former American detainee released after more than a year in Venezuelan prison

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.