U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

UFC Weigh-in at Freedom 250: Photos

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Anti-Kirk teacher honored, ICE supporter expelled, Pride display problem

Judge defends barring cameras from Karmelo Anthony murder trial, says it was ‘an easy decision’

Armed Citizens Stop Supermarket Shooter In Missouri

New Declassified Docs Give Tulsi Gabbard The Last Laugh On Ukrainian Biolabs

Socialist Mayor Floats Taking Guns Away From Pimps Instead Of Just Arresting Them For Trafficking

Leading Democrat Senate Candidate’s Ex-Staffer Charged For Alleged Pro-Terrorist Vandalism

Obama Presidential Center’s $470M safety net under scrutiny as subcontractors say they’re owed millions

Trump picks James McDonald to lead powerful Southern District of New York after Jay Clayton’s departure

Texas GOP convention’s live elephant steals the show — for all the wrong reasons

Rubio, Newsom share World Cup spotlight at US opener as 2028 presidential speculation swirls

Multiple people wounded in shooting at South Carolina’s largest mall, authorities detain suspects

Helicopter footage captures Florida man allegedly abandoning child during high-speed chase from deputies

Death threats from ‘TDS’ song show it’s ‘about the right thing’: Natasha Owens

Workers rip Trump name from Kennedy center facade months after it goes on, hours after failed appeal

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.