U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

DHS slams Democrat Sen Chris Van Hollen claim, says illegal alien caused crash while fleeing ICE

Illegal migrant charged in deadly 124 mph chase that killed pregnant teen, unborn child

Massive manhunt underway in New Hampshire town after gunman allegedly wounds police officer, fires on family

Jesse Watters Asks Todd Blanche Point-Blank If He Thinks Bondi Mishandled Epstein Files

Hegseth Says Service Members May Carry Firearms on Military Bases Reversing Dangerous Biden Policy

A de facto pro forma: Why Washington fixated these sessions as the DHS shutdown dragged on through recess

Tom Homan Reveals What’s Next for DOJ After Bondi’s Exit

FBI’s Patel delivers blunt warning to law enforcement attackers: ‘We’re going to put you down’

Jewish Europeans face deteriorating ‘normal’ as advocates warn spiking antisemitism a ‘mutating virus’

TEVI TROY: Trump faces the burdens of a wartime presidency

Daughters’ relentless search shatters ‘overdose’ claim, leads to arrest in mom’s 1992 murder

Three people hospitalized after city bus crashes into popular DC restaurant: officials

Democrat Lawmakers Move to Ban Napkins, Utensils in Take Out Food Orders

Blackmon: Competition, Not Monopoly Control, The Answer To Grid Reliability

Trump to Move Forest Service HQ from Washington, DC to Utah, and Shutter Research Sites

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.