U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.

Pentagon to Honor Lindsey Graham by Renaming Military Base

Nolan Wells mystery deepens as email indicates teen drank heavily before vanishing

Cracker Barrel CEO Out After Alienating Loyal Customers with Controversial Changes

Haley Stevens shreds Abdul El-Sayed: ‘We don’t need a celebrity candidate’

Supreme Court denies stays for two Florida death row inmates, clearing path for rare double execution

Watch: Trump Unhappy with Netanyahu’s Strategy Ahead of White House Meeting

Trump’s war on fraud expands as Treasury launches new site with whistleblower incentives

Federal Judge Rules Against New York Times, Gives Trump a Second Chance at $15 Billion Lawsuit

Public approval of Supreme Court drops to lowest level on record: Poll

Trump DOJ settles with anti-abortion father Paul Vaughn over FBI raid

Flock surveillance spreads across the South as red-state lawmakers seek to axe ‘1984’-style tracking tools

Thune gets choked up during funeral service while recalling Lindsey Graham’s humor

Dems Fight for Fraud with the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’

Beshear sends second letter to Mitch McConnell demanding ‘proof of your capacity to serve, or resign’

DCCC program knocks nearly 40,000 doors to mark 100 days from midterms

“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”

He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.

“That’s what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means,” he says.

This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

“A bit like what we saw in southern Europe with countries like Greece and the debt crisis and so on. There were decisions that were made for them and then they just had to have a more or less technocratic government and get it through.”

Professor Wæver made his predictions last month on the eve of the United Nations COP25 climate conference now underway in Madrid, Spain.

Almost 25,000 delegates and 1500 journalists have flown into the Spanish capital to attend the two-week long meeting.

COP25 will consider a wide agenda of global action including implementing taxes on developed countries to transfer wealth to nations dealing with “the cost of drought, floods and superstorms made worse by rising temperatures,” as Breitbart News report.