Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey acknowledged during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday that the social media giant was wrong to block New York Post tweets about Hunter Biden in the run-up to the Nov. 3 election.
Dorsey justified the company’s censorship of the Post tweets about the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and the Bidens’ connections to Ukraine and China under a 2018 policy intended to keep “Twitter from being used to spread hacked materials,” according to Fox News.
“We made a quick interpretation using no other evidence that the materials in the article were obtained through hacking and, according to our policy, we blocked them from being spread,” Dorsey said, according to Fox.
The block covered both public and private shares and locked the Post’s Twitter account.
“Upon further consideration, we admitted this action was wrong and corrected it within 24 hours,” Dorsey added.
Dorsey asserted Twitter informed the Post it could delete its Oct. 14 tweet, then duplicate and repost it, which he said the Post declined and “insisted we reverse our enforcement action.”
However, during an Oct. 28 hearing, Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz accused Dorsey of lying under oath, stating he was blocked from tweeting a Post story that day.
18 USC 1621 makes it a felony to lie under oath to the Senate. https://t.co/BDHRB8CEzy
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 28, 2020
The Post itself wrote that the standoff over six of its tweets ended on Oct. 30 — four days before the election.
— New York Post (@nypost) October 30, 2020
According to Fox, Dorsey said during Tuesday’s video testimony that Twitter had no retroactive practice overturning enforcement, but said the matter “demonstrated we needed one.”
Twitter has since created a policy it believes “is fair and appropriate,” Dorsey said.
Our policies are living documents. We're willing to update and adjust them when we encounter new scenarios or receive important feedback from the public. One such example is the recent change to our Hacked Materials Policy and its impact on accounts like the New York Post.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 30, 2020
Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham called both Twitter and Facebook — its CEO Mark Zuckerberg was also in the hot seat on Tuesday — the Post’s “ultimate editor.” Facebook restricted distribution of the Post’s Hunter Biden stories.
Graham — a South Carolina Republican– asked, “What I want to find out is, if you’re not a newspaper at Twitter or Facebook, then why do you have editorial control over the New York Post?
“They decided and maybe for a good reason, I don’t know, that the New York Post articles about Hunter Biden needed to be flagged, excluded from distribution or made hard to find,” Graham said.
“That, to me, seems like, you’re the ultimate editor,” Graham continued. “The editorial decision at the New York Post to run the story was overridden by Twitter and Facebook, in different fashions, to prevent its dissemination.
“Now if that’s not making an editorial decision, I don’t know what would be.”
The social media censorship apparently at least contributed to a virtual blackout on the Hunter Biden story in the mainstream media. According to the Media Research Center’s Newsbusters, the story received almost no attention on the major broadcast networks in the days after it broke.
According to Fox, Dorsey addressed Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which holds that social media companies are not “held liable for statements posted by users because the companies themselves are not the ones creating or editing the content as a newspaper would.”
“Some lawmakers, however, believe that by blocking certain content like the Post story they are indeed making editorial decisions,” Fox reported.
Dorsey said Twitter’s content moderation continues to pose concerns for the public over “its use of Section 230.”
He posed solutions he initially raised three weeks ago, Fox reported, including “expansions to Section 230, new legislative frameworks and commitment to industry-wide, self-regulation practices.”
Story cited here.