Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said Thursday night that he will oppose Democratic demands for additional witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.
Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate. That means no more than three Republicans can break away from the GOP position that witnesses should not be called for a vote on witnesses to fail. That motion is expected to be offered Friday.
If the Senate votes 50-50 on the motion, Chief Justice John Roberts, who is presiding over the trial, could use his power to break the tie, but that is considered unlikely.
Failure of that vote is widely seen to be a precursor to a vote to reject the articles of impeachment passed by the House and acquit the president.
In a statement issued by Alexander and posted on Twitter, the senator made no bones about his view that a July 25 call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was inappropriate.
Alexander was dismissive about the second article of impeachment against Trump, dealing with obstruction of Congress.
“There is no need to consider further the frivolous second article of impeachment that would remove the president for asserting his constitutional prerogative to protect confidential conversations with his close advisers,” he said in his statement.
The senator explained his stance on the first article, dealing with abuse of power.
“It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation,” Alexander said in his statement. “When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law.
“But the Constitution does not give the Senate the power to remove the president from office and ban him from this year’s ballot simply for actions that are inappropriate.
“The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday.
Gene Hackman’s Utility Company Speaks Out After Investigation, Details Deepen Mystery
Judge in Kohberger Case Realizes What Lawyers on Both Sides Are Keeping from the Public, Puts a Stop to It
Democrat Rep. Stansbury goes on profane tirade during sanctuary city hearing: ‘total bulls***’
Alleged Abbey Gate plotter extradited to US to face ‘justice for our 13,’ FBI Director Kash Patel says
Young father killed by illegal immigrant highlights ‘betrayal’ of sanctuary cities, says Republican
Majority of workers agree DOGE ‘5 things’ email request is ‘reasonable’: Poll
NFL Captain Unexpectedly Retires at Age 29
Two charged in Kansas City Chiefs fans’ deaths 14 months after bodies found frozen in backyard
New York City can’t stop Trump’s clawback of $80M for migrant hotels: Judge
On a Night Full of Embarrassing Moments for Democrats, Jasmine Crockett’s Rap Video Was Hard to Top
Conservative candidate garners higher favorability than liberal one in Wisconsin Supreme Court race
Blue state GOP lawmaker goes viral for exposing state’s spending proposals: ‘People were appalled’
Resolution punishing Al Green clears Dem blockade, advances to House-wide vote after Trump speech
US holding first-ever bilateral talks with Hamas
Hungary seeks ‘international alliance’ of ‘patriotic forces’ to replace liberal ‘Ivory tower’
The framers believed that there should never, ever be a partisan impeachment. That is why the Constitution requires a 2/3 vote of the Senate for conviction. Yet not one House Republican voted for these articles. 12/15
— Sen. Lamar Alexander (@SenAlexander) January 31, 2020
It would create the weapon of perpetual impeachment to be used against future presidents whenever the House of Representatives is of a different political party. 14/15
— Sen. Lamar Alexander (@SenAlexander) January 31, 2020
Our founding documents provide for duly elected presidents who serve with “the consent of the governed,” not at the pleasure of the United States Congress.
Let the people decide.
15/15
— Sen. Lamar Alexander (@SenAlexander) January 31, 2020
On Thursday, Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said she will vote to call new witnesses.
“I believe hearing from certain witnesses would give each side the opportunity to more fully and fairly make their case, resolve any ambiguities, and provide additional clarity. Therefore, I will vote in support of the motion to allow witnesses and documents to be subpoenaed,” she said in a statement.
I will vote in support of the motion to allow witnesses and documents to be subpoenaed. My full statement: https://t.co/VuhZv6CO5e pic.twitter.com/LhQlnvPaoc
— Sen. Susan Collins (@SenatorCollins) January 31, 2020
Republican Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah has said he wants to hear from former National Security Adviser John Bolton.
According to media accounts, a book Bolton will release in March claims Trump linked military aid to Ukraine with the country’s willingness to investigate a corruption investigation from 2016 that targeted Hunter Biden.
Gene Hackman’s Utility Company Speaks Out After Investigation, Details Deepen Mystery
Judge in Kohberger Case Realizes What Lawyers on Both Sides Are Keeping from the Public, Puts a Stop to It
Democrat Rep. Stansbury goes on profane tirade during sanctuary city hearing: ‘total bulls***’
Alleged Abbey Gate plotter extradited to US to face ‘justice for our 13,’ FBI Director Kash Patel says
Young father killed by illegal immigrant highlights ‘betrayal’ of sanctuary cities, says Republican
Majority of workers agree DOGE ‘5 things’ email request is ‘reasonable’: Poll
NFL Captain Unexpectedly Retires at Age 29
Two charged in Kansas City Chiefs fans’ deaths 14 months after bodies found frozen in backyard
New York City can’t stop Trump’s clawback of $80M for migrant hotels: Judge
On a Night Full of Embarrassing Moments for Democrats, Jasmine Crockett’s Rap Video Was Hard to Top
Conservative candidate garners higher favorability than liberal one in Wisconsin Supreme Court race
Blue state GOP lawmaker goes viral for exposing state’s spending proposals: ‘People were appalled’
Resolution punishing Al Green clears Dem blockade, advances to House-wide vote after Trump speech
US holding first-ever bilateral talks with Hamas
Hungary seeks ‘international alliance’ of ‘patriotic forces’ to replace liberal ‘Ivory tower’
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she was considering her position. During Thursday’s session, she said the dispute over whether aid was linked with an investigation “weighs in favor” of calling witnesses, according to Roll Call.
Story cited here.
