TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

El-Sayed mocks Trump, Vance and Rogers in gloating victory speech signaling combative tone in Senate

Dem AG pulls off upset of sitting Republican governor after blistering campaign in key swing state

Abdul el Sayed defeats Mike Rogers in Michigan race, poised to become first Muslim senator

Thune plans to run for Republican minority leader after Dem’s midterm takeover

Abdul El-Sayed delivers major blow to GOP in Michigan after bruising Senate race

Breaking: Democrats Flip Senate Seat in State Trump Won by Double Digits

Mamdani-Backed Democratic Socialist Wins House Seat

Democrats Win Texas Governor’s Race for First Time in 30 Years as Gina Hinojosa Defeats Greg Abbott

Breaking: Democrats Deal Massive Blow to Republicans, Win Control of the Senate

Breaking: Democrats Flip Red House District, Unseat Rep. Victoria Spartz

Breaking: Vivek Ramaswamy Suffers Painful Loss to Amy Acton in Ohio Governor’s Race

Democrat Gina Hinojosa stuns Abbott, makes history as first Latina Texas governor

Trump’s gamble on Ken Paxton backfires as Democrat pulls off historic Texas Senate upset

‘Planted Fake Corpses’: Former El-Sayed Campaign Worker Charged in Alleged Conspiracy to Victimize Supporters of Israel

Teen previously convicted in shooting accused of killing pregnant mom of 4 inside Spirit Halloween

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.