TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

Senators defend two-week recess as record-breaking government shutdown drags on

Joe Kent urges Americans to oppose US ground troops in Iran war

Scorned ex-lover accuses Sinema of ‘malicious’ marriage interference

Taiwanese opposition leader agrees to meet Xi Jinping ahead of Trump summit

Trump Says He Wants to ‘Take the Oil in Iran,’ Slams ‘Stupid People Back in the US’ for Objecting

Gov Who Might Become President Solely Due to Family Name and Hereditary Wealth Declares, Hilariously, ‘We Do Not Have Kings’

Mike Rowe unleashes on Jimmy Kimmel’s latest ‘tone-deaf’ takedown targeting everyday Americans

Supreme Court declines to hear ‘Tiger King’ Joe Exotic’s challenge after murder-for-hire conviction

Inmate Tries Handing Over ‘Wad’ of Counterfeit Cash to Judge for Paying Bond

Here Are the IRS Scams You May Face This Tax Season

Iran vows enemies won’t escape without a ‘lesson’ amid warning of ‘major world war’ and more top headlines

Communists, Democrats use #NoKings rally to call for May Day strike: ‘Shut it down’

Manufacturing has struggled since ‘Liberation Day’

Insurgent Virginia Democrat says his party is ‘completely wrong’ on gun rights and gerrymandering

Democratic lawmakers took cash from infamous ‘domestic terrorist’ Bill Ayers

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.