TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

Bondi targets James Comey, Letitia James in legal battle: ‘hold…accountable for unlawful conduct’

DOJ files motion to unseal Epstein docs in latest step toward release

Australian Senate Suspended After Right-Wing Leader Wears Burka in Protest

America’s smallest cattle herd in 70 years means rebuilding will take years and beef prices could stay high

‘Chanting Bring in Trump’: After Wildly Violent Chicago Weekend, Trump Says He’s Being Begged to Save the Blue City

Justice Thomas rebukes SCOTUS for denying widow’s case, says it lets government dodge blame

Couric and Psaki condemn pressroom political diversity: Liberal Media Scream

Royal Navy catches two Russian spy ships in English Channel

Bodycam images show Luigi Mangione’s McDonald’s arrest as defense challenges evidence collection

Senate Democrat Facing Court-Martial Over Video Encouraging Military Personnel to Defy Trump

Leftists Accidentally Prove Therapist Correct After He Declares ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ Is Real

Chicago train attack suspect repeatedly violated curfew, movement restrictions, records show

Deep-pocketed conservative group once at odds with Trump now all-in to ‘help him win’

Federal judge dismisses James Comey, Letitia James indictments

DOJ Reveals ‘Damning’ Evidence Against Letitia James in New Court Filing

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.