TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

Investigators believe Iranian hackers are likely behind cyberattack on Minnesota water systems: report

Ben Sasse’s latest pancreatic cancer update comes amid his stark warning about America’s future

Woman’s death at Boston home owned by Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s husband ruled a homicide: officials

Powerful Democratic Donors Terrified About 2028 Due to ‘Floundering’ DNC: Report

NY Sheriff Defies Kathy Hochul’s New Law That Seeks to Block Law Enforcement from Working with ICE

Colorado small town abandoned after all elected officials resign, water concerns grow

Pro-Trump influencer Laura Loomer shifts toward Ukraine support

Trump questions Thune’s leadership as SAVE America Act stalls

Op-Ed: The First Amendment Isn’t Optional

Army veteran raves over Trump’s plan to ditch illegal alien truck drivers and hire vets

The generational divide over affordability in the Trump economy is all about housing

How One Congressional Resolution Could Save the Midterms: The GOP’s Hindu Vote Gamble

Troy Jackson swapped out Senate campaign official also behind the super PAC backing Abdul el Sayed

Mystery stranger vanishes after family says frantic warning saved their lives during devastating house fire

WNBA Headache Gets Bigger: More Sophie Cunningham Rallies Scheduled

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.