TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

Chinese National Arrested at US University for Poisoning Classmate Engaged in Cutting Edge Cancer Research

Dems Make Historic All-In Midterm Move: Talarico Raises More in Third Quarter Than Any Senate Candidate in History

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Judeo-Christian values under assault in American schools

Cookies, liquor and mocking Nazis fuel final stretch in fiery Texas House race

Cancel Culture Comes for Halloween: School Cancels Parades for ‘Inclusivity’

Watch: SNL’s Michael Che Refuses to Cave to Woke Mob as Interviewer Nags Him About Shane Gillis’ Gym Clothes Joke

Hero dad who took down Oregon school shooter identified along with teacher killed in attack

Kid Rock Opens Up About What Inspired His New Gospel Album, and It’s Quite the Story

Ukraine drone strikes and Iran war split blame on skyrocketing diesel prices

CBS Tried to Trash Trump Again, Now They’re Facing Another Multimillion Suit, This Time from a 15-Year-Old They Trashed

Tish James confronted on camera over Trump’s accusation of bias in Cornell rape case

Democrats’ latest gun-control push runs into inconvenient fact about how school killer was stopped

Obama’s star power gets a reality check from Black voters in crucial Senate race: ‘It’s a turn-off’

Trump says he doesn’t know who ordered Starshield throttle in Ukraine

Biden judge rejects Obama CIA chief’s legal bid against Trump over one key problem

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.