Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
White House slams Democrat governor for urging public to track ICE agents with new video portal
Boston’s Wu orders release of ICE surveillance and bodycam footage, says fed government ‘hides behind masks’
Baltimore Mayor Plays the Race Card After Being Called Out on His $163,495 Taxpayer-Funded Vehicle
Kamala Harris Gives Clearest Indication Yet That She’s Running in 2028, Restarts 2024 Machine
Winning! Rental Prices Drop to 4-Year Low After Major Spike Under Biden
White House says murder rate plummeted to lowest level since 1900 under Trump administration
Breaking: FBI Arrests Man for Allegedly Targeting Nancy Guthrie’s Family with Demands
Los Angeles mayoral race upended by allegations Karen Bass altered fire report
Leavitt flips script on media for balking at Fulton election probe after years of promoting Russia claims
Anti-ICE ‘digital Minutemen’ use military-grade surveillance tactics against feds
Trump claims DNI Tulsi Gabbard was at Georgia election hub search because AG Pam Bondi wanted her there
Jill Biden’s ex-husband, now charged with murder, called wife ‘greatest thing in my life’
Arctic blast fuels scrutiny of Biden’s $8B electric bus push as watchdogs cite oversight failures
Jeffries risks fresh fracture with Schumer over ICE funding red line
Suspect Arrested After 30-Year-Old Woman Is Killed ‘Execution Style’ While Opening Her Business
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
White House slams Democrat governor for urging public to track ICE agents with new video portal
Boston’s Wu orders release of ICE surveillance and bodycam footage, says fed government ‘hides behind masks’
Baltimore Mayor Plays the Race Card After Being Called Out on His $163,495 Taxpayer-Funded Vehicle
Kamala Harris Gives Clearest Indication Yet That She’s Running in 2028, Restarts 2024 Machine
Winning! Rental Prices Drop to 4-Year Low After Major Spike Under Biden
White House says murder rate plummeted to lowest level since 1900 under Trump administration
Breaking: FBI Arrests Man for Allegedly Targeting Nancy Guthrie’s Family with Demands
Los Angeles mayoral race upended by allegations Karen Bass altered fire report
Leavitt flips script on media for balking at Fulton election probe after years of promoting Russia claims
Anti-ICE ‘digital Minutemen’ use military-grade surveillance tactics against feds
Trump claims DNI Tulsi Gabbard was at Georgia election hub search because AG Pam Bondi wanted her there
Jill Biden’s ex-husband, now charged with murder, called wife ‘greatest thing in my life’
Arctic blast fuels scrutiny of Biden’s $8B electric bus push as watchdogs cite oversight failures
Jeffries risks fresh fracture with Schumer over ICE funding red line
Suspect Arrested After 30-Year-Old Woman Is Killed ‘Execution Style’ While Opening Her Business
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
