Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
Susie Wiles’ lawyer denies approving FBI recording, says he’d lose license over ‘stunt’
Watch: Doorbell Camera Catches Toddler Barely Escaping Aggressive Coyote in the Middle of Los Angeles County
Agency that nabbed ‘El Chapo,’ ‘Diddy’ threatened as Democrats’ DHS shutdown drags on
Watch: Black Panelist Mops Floor with White Lib Who Seems to Think Black Americans Don’t Know How to Get ID
Registered sex offender’s city council bid sparks fury as officials explore blocking his path
Where Iran’s ballistic missiles can reach — and how close they are to the US
Swalwell campaign sets off alarm bells after accepting $25K donation from CCP-tied lawyer: ‘Outrageous’
California’s vulnerable House Republicans swap districts and strategize ahead of primary
Bill Clinton faces high-stakes House grilling in Epstein probe and more top headlines
Senate GOP sends warning to House SAVE Act agitators: Don’t tell us what to do
Donald Trump and Mark Carney: ‘Clash-mates’?
Republicans have a rare shot at winning the California governorship
DOJ sues 5 more states, demanding access to voter rolls: ‘We will not be deterred’
MLB Star Blasts Newsom for Implying Black People Are ‘Stupid’ and Can’t Read: ‘I Was a Straight A Student’
Corporate America is on the move, and these red states are cashing in
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
Susie Wiles’ lawyer denies approving FBI recording, says he’d lose license over ‘stunt’
Watch: Doorbell Camera Catches Toddler Barely Escaping Aggressive Coyote in the Middle of Los Angeles County
Agency that nabbed ‘El Chapo,’ ‘Diddy’ threatened as Democrats’ DHS shutdown drags on
Watch: Black Panelist Mops Floor with White Lib Who Seems to Think Black Americans Don’t Know How to Get ID
Registered sex offender’s city council bid sparks fury as officials explore blocking his path
Where Iran’s ballistic missiles can reach — and how close they are to the US
Swalwell campaign sets off alarm bells after accepting $25K donation from CCP-tied lawyer: ‘Outrageous’
California’s vulnerable House Republicans swap districts and strategize ahead of primary
Bill Clinton faces high-stakes House grilling in Epstein probe and more top headlines
Senate GOP sends warning to House SAVE Act agitators: Don’t tell us what to do
Donald Trump and Mark Carney: ‘Clash-mates’?
Republicans have a rare shot at winning the California governorship
DOJ sues 5 more states, demanding access to voter rolls: ‘We will not be deterred’
MLB Star Blasts Newsom for Implying Black People Are ‘Stupid’ and Can’t Read: ‘I Was a Straight A Student’
Corporate America is on the move, and these red states are cashing in
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
