Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
Woke ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson Sees Second Movie Bomb at Box Office in as Many Months
PA Republicans Sound Alarm on Disease Rule Proposal That Would Allow ‘Health Agencies to Enter Any Home’ Without Warrant
Ex-Democrat shares abortion pill experience that left her ‘hemorrhaging in the bath’
Trump-backed Iowa US Senate hopeful says Iran war must ‘be brought to a successful and immediate end’
2027 Working Dogs Commemorative Coin designs unveiled at the White House
‘Jews for Abdul’ featured in el Sayed campaign video are actually activists with anti-Israel group
Misleading ballot image prompts election review in Virginia
Massachusetts lesbian bar ignites fury after easing mask rules for one night a week
Mamdani fires back at Netanyahu, calls Israeli leader ‘architect of horrific genocide’ ahead of UN visit
Florida AG accuses teacher of labeling student a ‘misogynist’ over ‘conservative views’: ‘She should be fired’
Texas man charged with capital murder after 5-year-old killed in roadway shooting
Harris keeps 2028 door open as she hits midterm campaign trail, warns ‘28 won’t matter’ without 2026
Takaichi and victim families make multifront plea for US to help Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea
‘Big Sister’ warning resurfaces as Massachusetts expands home visits after Clancy trial
White House Official Says Fox News and Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Have ‘Revealed Themselves for Who They Truly Are’
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
Woke ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson Sees Second Movie Bomb at Box Office in as Many Months
PA Republicans Sound Alarm on Disease Rule Proposal That Would Allow ‘Health Agencies to Enter Any Home’ Without Warrant
Ex-Democrat shares abortion pill experience that left her ‘hemorrhaging in the bath’
Trump-backed Iowa US Senate hopeful says Iran war must ‘be brought to a successful and immediate end’
2027 Working Dogs Commemorative Coin designs unveiled at the White House
‘Jews for Abdul’ featured in el Sayed campaign video are actually activists with anti-Israel group
Misleading ballot image prompts election review in Virginia
Massachusetts lesbian bar ignites fury after easing mask rules for one night a week
Mamdani fires back at Netanyahu, calls Israeli leader ‘architect of horrific genocide’ ahead of UN visit
Florida AG accuses teacher of labeling student a ‘misogynist’ over ‘conservative views’: ‘She should be fired’
Texas man charged with capital murder after 5-year-old killed in roadway shooting
Harris keeps 2028 door open as she hits midterm campaign trail, warns ‘28 won’t matter’ without 2026
Takaichi and victim families make multifront plea for US to help Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea
‘Big Sister’ warning resurfaces as Massachusetts expands home visits after Clancy trial
White House Official Says Fox News and Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Have ‘Revealed Themselves for Who They Truly Are’
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
