Finance International News Opinons Trade

TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.


Los Angeles County declares local state of emergency over ICE raid surge
Family says off-duty Milwaukee officer acted appropriately in fatal shooting caught on dashcam video
Trump posthumously awards Charlie Kirk Presidential Medal of Freedom: Photos
Judge temporarily blocks transfer of Miami land for Trump presidential library
Hochul fires at Stefanik over New York Young Republicans’ leaked texts
Erika Kirk honors late husband Charlie in emotional White House tribute: ‘A free man made fully free’
Republican lawmakers demand Treasury probe CAIR over alleged Hamas ties and terrorism concerns
DHS Confirms Sickening Plot ‘From Mexico’ Targeting ICE and CBP Agents
‘Unsightly tactics’: Feds react to nude bicycle protesters who bared all outside ICE facility
Israel receives remains of four more hostages kidnapped by Hamas
Longtime LendingTree CEO Dies in Accident on Family Farm
Trump blasts ‘weakened’ Schumer as Democrats again block GOP effort to reopen government
Watch: ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on Jasmine Crockett for Her ‘Street’ Persona
Zohran Mamdani’s NYC mayoral campaign took foreign cash, raising compliance questions
Trump Calls Out Time Magazine for Using ‘Really Weird’ Photo of Him for Cover: ‘What Are They Doing, and Why?’
See also  Trump bets on Kushner and Witkoff to see through Israel and Hamas peace deal

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.


Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.


Los Angeles County declares local state of emergency over ICE raid surge
Family says off-duty Milwaukee officer acted appropriately in fatal shooting caught on dashcam video
Trump posthumously awards Charlie Kirk Presidential Medal of Freedom: Photos
Judge temporarily blocks transfer of Miami land for Trump presidential library
Hochul fires at Stefanik over New York Young Republicans’ leaked texts
Erika Kirk honors late husband Charlie in emotional White House tribute: ‘A free man made fully free’
Republican lawmakers demand Treasury probe CAIR over alleged Hamas ties and terrorism concerns
DHS Confirms Sickening Plot ‘From Mexico’ Targeting ICE and CBP Agents
‘Unsightly tactics’: Feds react to nude bicycle protesters who bared all outside ICE facility
Israel receives remains of four more hostages kidnapped by Hamas
Longtime LendingTree CEO Dies in Accident on Family Farm
Trump blasts ‘weakened’ Schumer as Democrats again block GOP effort to reopen government
Watch: ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on Jasmine Crockett for Her ‘Street’ Persona
Zohran Mamdani’s NYC mayoral campaign took foreign cash, raising compliance questions
Trump Calls Out Time Magazine for Using ‘Really Weird’ Photo of Him for Cover: ‘What Are They Doing, and Why?’
See also  Bondi announces arrest of far-left activist who threatened commentator Benny Johnson

In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter