Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
Ax-wielding suspect subdued by teen military recruit’s MMA takedown in car wash clash caught on video
‘Unprecedented’ agreement releases emergency oil reserves as gas prices spark concerns
House Oversight Committee demands depositions from Bondi and Lutnick in Epstein probe
Dem lawmaker disputes police bodycam amid reports he said he was above the law: ‘On top’ or ‘on time’
Bipartisan housing push advances, but Trump-backed investor ban faces resistance
Trump administration puts key Biden-era immigration policy on notice: ‘Unsustainable cycle’
The ‘Worst Mayor in America’ Is Attempting a Political Comeback — With a New Party
Kamala Harris Cancels Multiple Book Tour Stops Amid Controversy
Unusual Calls Made from NYC Terror Suspect’s Home Hours After Arrest Raise Questions: Report
Uh-Oh: Video Captures Schumer Finally Admitting It – He Hates the SAVE America Act Because It Cleans Voter Rolls in Every State
Longtime Starbucks CEO Ditches Seattle for Florida on the Same Day Washington House Passes ‘Millionaires’ Tax’
Insane: CNN’s Abby Phillip Claims NYC ISIS Bomb Plot Targeting Protesters Was Really an Attack on Mamdani
Hillary Clinton caught on video stepping back after pushy former president nudges her at busy NYC intersection
Shipping disruptions spread beyond oil: Helium, sulfur, and semiconductors
3 brothers of Iraqi descent arrested in Oslo for allegedly ‘terror bombing’ of US Embassy
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
Ax-wielding suspect subdued by teen military recruit’s MMA takedown in car wash clash caught on video
‘Unprecedented’ agreement releases emergency oil reserves as gas prices spark concerns
House Oversight Committee demands depositions from Bondi and Lutnick in Epstein probe
Dem lawmaker disputes police bodycam amid reports he said he was above the law: ‘On top’ or ‘on time’
Bipartisan housing push advances, but Trump-backed investor ban faces resistance
Trump administration puts key Biden-era immigration policy on notice: ‘Unsustainable cycle’
The ‘Worst Mayor in America’ Is Attempting a Political Comeback — With a New Party
Kamala Harris Cancels Multiple Book Tour Stops Amid Controversy
Unusual Calls Made from NYC Terror Suspect’s Home Hours After Arrest Raise Questions: Report
Uh-Oh: Video Captures Schumer Finally Admitting It – He Hates the SAVE America Act Because It Cleans Voter Rolls in Every State
Longtime Starbucks CEO Ditches Seattle for Florida on the Same Day Washington House Passes ‘Millionaires’ Tax’
Insane: CNN’s Abby Phillip Claims NYC ISIS Bomb Plot Targeting Protesters Was Really an Attack on Mamdani
Hillary Clinton caught on video stepping back after pushy former president nudges her at busy NYC intersection
Shipping disruptions spread beyond oil: Helium, sulfur, and semiconductors
3 brothers of Iraqi descent arrested in Oslo for allegedly ‘terror bombing’ of US Embassy
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
