Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
Alaska woman uses weapon to survive terrifying bear attack after predator mauls pooch: ‘I thought I was dead’
Son of Mango fashion billionaire heard tearfully telling 911 operator his father had ‘fallen down a ravine’
Vance Gives Perfect Response After ‘View’ Host Brings Up His Past Criticism of Trump
Republicans bat down bid to handcuff Trump’s war powers as peace deal nears
15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations
JD Vance Responds as Lindsey Graham Expresses Skepticism About Iran Deal
Mother’s tip helped unravel White House UFC drone plot: Affidavit
Lawmakers demand answers after NIH scientists charged in monkeypox smuggling conspiracy
MLB Reprimands Christian Players Who Took a Stand Against ‘Pride Night’
Todd Blanche earns attorney general bid endorsement from law enforcement alliance ahead of confirmation
Trump Says Israel Is Fighting ‘Too Long, and Too Many People Are Being Killed’
Hungary changes constitution to ban Viktor Orban reelection as Peter Magyar prepares to oust president
Report links anti-Christian extremism and ‘assassination culture’ to alleged plot against Erika Kirk
Luigi Mangione supporter working for far-left DC mayoral candidate likened to Mamdani
South Carolina personal trainer goes missing, last spotted walking toward wooded area
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
Alaska woman uses weapon to survive terrifying bear attack after predator mauls pooch: ‘I thought I was dead’
Son of Mango fashion billionaire heard tearfully telling 911 operator his father had ‘fallen down a ravine’
Vance Gives Perfect Response After ‘View’ Host Brings Up His Past Criticism of Trump
Republicans bat down bid to handcuff Trump’s war powers as peace deal nears
15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations
JD Vance Responds as Lindsey Graham Expresses Skepticism About Iran Deal
Mother’s tip helped unravel White House UFC drone plot: Affidavit
Lawmakers demand answers after NIH scientists charged in monkeypox smuggling conspiracy
MLB Reprimands Christian Players Who Took a Stand Against ‘Pride Night’
Todd Blanche earns attorney general bid endorsement from law enforcement alliance ahead of confirmation
Trump Says Israel Is Fighting ‘Too Long, and Too Many People Are Being Killed’
Hungary changes constitution to ban Viktor Orban reelection as Peter Magyar prepares to oust president
Report links anti-Christian extremism and ‘assassination culture’ to alleged plot against Erika Kirk
Luigi Mangione supporter working for far-left DC mayoral candidate likened to Mamdani
South Carolina personal trainer goes missing, last spotted walking toward wooded area
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
