Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison Set to Testify Before Congress About Massive Fraud Allegations
Conservative group blasts LinkedIn for removing pro-ICE post, labeling it ‘hateful’
Famed filmmaker presses Democrats to put ‘citizen-led’ presidential primary first
He’s Not Joking: Jim Acosta Claims Don Lemon Was Arrested Because He’s Black
LAPD arrests violent agitators after protests erupt outside federal detention center in Los Angeles
Government shuts down again after Democrats revolt over DHS funding
Left-wing activists storming synagogue use knee pads, adult diaper to mock Dem congressman over ICE vote
ICE lodges detainer for illegal immigrant accused of sexually assaulting teen
US approves massive arms sales to Israel and Saudi Arabia for more than $15 billion amid Middle East tensions
Letitia James fires attorney consumer fraud over criticism of pediatric ‘gender care’
Saudis won’t let the US use its bases or airspace for an attack on Iran, senior Gulf official reveals
DOJ Releases Massive Trove of Epstein Files Documents, Statement on Trump Involvement
Rep Jeffries escalates rhetoric against Noem, says DHS leader should be ‘put on ice permanently’
Coast Guard searching for survivors after commercial fishing boat sinks off Massachusetts; 1 body recovered
‘Opening Pandora’s Box’: Mike Johnson backs Trump after warning White House about deal with Democrats
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison Set to Testify Before Congress About Massive Fraud Allegations
Conservative group blasts LinkedIn for removing pro-ICE post, labeling it ‘hateful’
Famed filmmaker presses Democrats to put ‘citizen-led’ presidential primary first
He’s Not Joking: Jim Acosta Claims Don Lemon Was Arrested Because He’s Black
LAPD arrests violent agitators after protests erupt outside federal detention center in Los Angeles
Government shuts down again after Democrats revolt over DHS funding
Left-wing activists storming synagogue use knee pads, adult diaper to mock Dem congressman over ICE vote
ICE lodges detainer for illegal immigrant accused of sexually assaulting teen
US approves massive arms sales to Israel and Saudi Arabia for more than $15 billion amid Middle East tensions
Letitia James fires attorney consumer fraud over criticism of pediatric ‘gender care’
Saudis won’t let the US use its bases or airspace for an attack on Iran, senior Gulf official reveals
DOJ Releases Massive Trove of Epstein Files Documents, Statement on Trump Involvement
Rep Jeffries escalates rhetoric against Noem, says DHS leader should be ‘put on ice permanently’
Coast Guard searching for survivors after commercial fishing boat sinks off Massachusetts; 1 body recovered
‘Opening Pandora’s Box’: Mike Johnson backs Trump after warning White House about deal with Democrats
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
