Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
‘He hated women’: Explosive abuse, new Nazi tattoo allegations from exes rock Platner’s campaign
‘I Would Rape Them to Show Them I’m Dominant’ – Graham Platner’s Campaign Won’t Dispute Shocking Quote in NYT Report
Israel-Lebanon ceasefire could undermine Hezbollah and Iran with state-to-state cooperation
Hunter Biden could mount a successful White House bid given recent Democrat picks: Trump
BREAKING: NYT Drops Graham Platner Domestic Violence Bombshell Report – Scared, Left Marks, Wrenched Arms, According to Ex-Girlfriend
Woman’s body washes ashore in Florida as investigators dig into beach discovery
Shelter-in-place order issued in Chicago suburb as police hunt suspect after reported shooting
Trump Upbraids 4 Republicans Who Sided with Dems on Iran War Powers Resolution Vote During Peace Negotiations
Bessent spars with Dem in fiery Trump tax showdown until claim crosses the line: ‘Slanderous’
SEE IT: Lavish $35M mansion bought by tech CEO accused of feeding US gear to Iran’s nuclear machine
Famous YouTuber Doesn’t Get the Response He Hoped for After Explaining Why He Murdered His Unborn Child
Ayatollah says Iran has ‘defeated’ US as Trump, Rubio acknowledge he’s playing active role in regime
DeSantis Rips California’s ‘Corrosive’ Election System: ‘Count Until You Get the Result You Want?’
Watch: Chaos Erupts at High School Graduation When Graduates Begin Punching Each Other
Tulsi Gabbard reveals husband’s ‘very rare sacral chordoma’: ‘In a lot of pain’ after 7-hour surgery
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
‘He hated women’: Explosive abuse, new Nazi tattoo allegations from exes rock Platner’s campaign
‘I Would Rape Them to Show Them I’m Dominant’ – Graham Platner’s Campaign Won’t Dispute Shocking Quote in NYT Report
Israel-Lebanon ceasefire could undermine Hezbollah and Iran with state-to-state cooperation
Hunter Biden could mount a successful White House bid given recent Democrat picks: Trump
BREAKING: NYT Drops Graham Platner Domestic Violence Bombshell Report – Scared, Left Marks, Wrenched Arms, According to Ex-Girlfriend
Woman’s body washes ashore in Florida as investigators dig into beach discovery
Shelter-in-place order issued in Chicago suburb as police hunt suspect after reported shooting
Trump Upbraids 4 Republicans Who Sided with Dems on Iran War Powers Resolution Vote During Peace Negotiations
Bessent spars with Dem in fiery Trump tax showdown until claim crosses the line: ‘Slanderous’
SEE IT: Lavish $35M mansion bought by tech CEO accused of feeding US gear to Iran’s nuclear machine
Famous YouTuber Doesn’t Get the Response He Hoped for After Explaining Why He Murdered His Unborn Child
Ayatollah says Iran has ‘defeated’ US as Trump, Rubio acknowledge he’s playing active role in regime
DeSantis Rips California’s ‘Corrosive’ Election System: ‘Count Until You Get the Result You Want?’
Watch: Chaos Erupts at High School Graduation When Graduates Begin Punching Each Other
Tulsi Gabbard reveals husband’s ‘very rare sacral chordoma’: ‘In a lot of pain’ after 7-hour surgery
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
