TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

Obama Operative Turned Trump Voter Exposes the Anti-Working-Class Bigotry That Destroyed the Democrats

Fox News Stars Mourn the Brutal Murder of a Beloved ‘Fan Who Became a Friend’

EXCLUSIVE: Pence group knocks Vance plan to pay stay-at-home parents up to $9K per child

Clinton, Bush received multiple warnings on bin Laden hijack plots before 9/11, declassified files show

Nashville Airport Authority Votes Unanimously to Change Name to Honor Dolly Parton

Watch: Convention Crowd Symbolically Anoints JD Vance for 2028 with Chant

Inside Trump’s intimate meeting with nation’s bravest soldiers during whirlwind Texas trip

California woman chased, fatally shot by illegal immigrant DoorDash driver who stalked her for months: DHS

AOC, Mamdani interaction caught on cam at 9/11 memorial sparks online fury

Breaking: Newly Declassified 9/11 Documents Reveal the Repeated Warnings Received by Clinton and Bush

The ‘Jumper’ Victims of 9/11 Deserve to Have Their Stories Heard: And Yet They’ve Been Erased by the Media

Attacks of 9/11 sent Rep. Eli Crane into the military and shaped the way he views the Iran war

Texas man remembered by Fox News hosts after repeat offender arrested in savage park bench slaying

Reporter’s Notebook: Countdown is on as Senate races to pass crypto, college sports bills

Court documents show groups inspiring ‘satanist’ teenager’s alleged plans to attack Christians

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.