Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
GOP hopeful removes ‘Pro-Trump’ mention from campaign slogan in deep-red seat
Spencer Pratt warns ‘good luck LA’ after new poll vindicates his stunning prediction
Zelensky urges UN to resolve Ukraine war before AI can ‘decide what happens on the battlefield’
Trump’s diesel idea could unleash a problem Americans never saw coming
Nineteen states have approved permanent daylight saving time. What does that mean for the clocks this year?
Trump to ask Xi to free wrongfully detained US citizen as wife speaks out
SHOCK POLL: Powerful blue state gov’s lead shrinks to single digits weeks before election
Watch: Retiring Judge Judy Finally Goes Totally Political and It’s the Most Glorious 2 MAGA Minutes of Her Career
US walks out of UN General Assembly as Iranian president decries ‘genocide’ and ‘terrorism’ against Iran
Star of Canceled ‘She-Hulk’ Series Says Actors Are Supposed to Be Political: ‘Artists Are Like Mirrors’
Syrian president bashes Israel for airstrikes during UN speech
Oblivious Politico Makes Humiliating Mistake, Thinks Jewish Wedding Tradition May Be Trump Admin Bribery Scheme
Newsom’s admission that infamous COVID move was ‘insane’ triggers viral fury: ‘We all told you’
Man Who Jumped from Cruise Ship Identified, Was Father of 3 and on 15th Wedding Anniversary Trip with Wife
New Jersey police pull out 3-foot python from woman’s car grille, bodycam video shows
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
GOP hopeful removes ‘Pro-Trump’ mention from campaign slogan in deep-red seat
Spencer Pratt warns ‘good luck LA’ after new poll vindicates his stunning prediction
Zelensky urges UN to resolve Ukraine war before AI can ‘decide what happens on the battlefield’
Trump’s diesel idea could unleash a problem Americans never saw coming
Nineteen states have approved permanent daylight saving time. What does that mean for the clocks this year?
Trump to ask Xi to free wrongfully detained US citizen as wife speaks out
SHOCK POLL: Powerful blue state gov’s lead shrinks to single digits weeks before election
Watch: Retiring Judge Judy Finally Goes Totally Political and It’s the Most Glorious 2 MAGA Minutes of Her Career
US walks out of UN General Assembly as Iranian president decries ‘genocide’ and ‘terrorism’ against Iran
Star of Canceled ‘She-Hulk’ Series Says Actors Are Supposed to Be Political: ‘Artists Are Like Mirrors’
Syrian president bashes Israel for airstrikes during UN speech
Oblivious Politico Makes Humiliating Mistake, Thinks Jewish Wedding Tradition May Be Trump Admin Bribery Scheme
Newsom’s admission that infamous COVID move was ‘insane’ triggers viral fury: ‘We all told you’
Man Who Jumped from Cruise Ship Identified, Was Father of 3 and on 15th Wedding Anniversary Trip with Wife
New Jersey police pull out 3-foot python from woman’s car grille, bodycam video shows
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
