Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
America’s housing market could run out of something more important than homes
How Iran attacks are forcing the Pentagon to rethink its decades-old Middle East base strategy
Baby Beaten Nearly to Death by Children, 4 and 6, as Sitter Gives Most Nauseating Excuse We’ve Ever Heard
Ukraine’s 40-day missile and drone blitz heaps pressure and pain on Putin
DeSantis announces plans to use new state law to target dozens of alleged terrorist groups
Acting AG Todd Blanche says Newsom’s DOJ claims are not ‘grounded in fact’
Mexican national sentenced in border child smuggling case involving THC-laced candy
Virginia officer placed on administrative leave after malicious wounding charge tied to off duty incident
Two arrested at Costco after alleged fraudulent credit card shopping spree
Russian missile attack on Kyiv collapses apartment building, trapping residents
Wild video captures apartment complex electrical room explosion as firefighters investigate smoke call
Two People Climb to the Top of Empire State Building Antenna, Fly Banner with Message
Coalition of 25 states sues Trump admin over Medicaid work rule designed to prevent fraud
Internal emails expose how July 4th bash is being derailed by Dem-run county: ‘Offensive’
Michelle Obama Went ‘Absolutely Ballistic’ and Blocked RFK Jr.’s Wife Cheryl Hines from Appearing in New Show: Report
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
America’s housing market could run out of something more important than homes
How Iran attacks are forcing the Pentagon to rethink its decades-old Middle East base strategy
Baby Beaten Nearly to Death by Children, 4 and 6, as Sitter Gives Most Nauseating Excuse We’ve Ever Heard
Ukraine’s 40-day missile and drone blitz heaps pressure and pain on Putin
DeSantis announces plans to use new state law to target dozens of alleged terrorist groups
Acting AG Todd Blanche says Newsom’s DOJ claims are not ‘grounded in fact’
Mexican national sentenced in border child smuggling case involving THC-laced candy
Virginia officer placed on administrative leave after malicious wounding charge tied to off duty incident
Two arrested at Costco after alleged fraudulent credit card shopping spree
Russian missile attack on Kyiv collapses apartment building, trapping residents
Wild video captures apartment complex electrical room explosion as firefighters investigate smoke call
Two People Climb to the Top of Empire State Building Antenna, Fly Banner with Message
Coalition of 25 states sues Trump admin over Medicaid work rule designed to prevent fraud
Internal emails expose how July 4th bash is being derailed by Dem-run county: ‘Offensive’
Michelle Obama Went ‘Absolutely Ballistic’ and Blocked RFK Jr.’s Wife Cheryl Hines from Appearing in New Show: Report
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
