TRUMP RIDS MAJOR U.S. CONTAINER PORT OF CHINESE COMMUNIST CONTROL

Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.

It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.

Senate Republicans block Schiff effort to force release of Caribbean strike footage

Trump on thin ice with breadwinners and MAGA over lackluster economy

WATCH: Doctor-lawmaker blames Obamacare for driving health costs higher

Creeps at PornHub Are Being Extorted by Creep Hackers Threatening to Publish Creep Customers’ Porn Habits Just in Time for Christmas

Several House Republicans Side With Democrats in Attempt to Extend Obamacare Subsidies

Four Republicans buck Mike Johnson to join Hakeem Jeffries’ Obamacare push

Global wave of terror plots sparks new alarms over the West’s growing vulnerability

Nick Reiner Had a Bizarre Interaction with a Famous Comedian the Night Before His Parents’ Murder: Report

Bondi Beach mass shooting suspect charged with committing terrorist act

Trump Issues New Travel Bans and Restrictions for 20 Countries

Maryland to study slavery reparations after lawmakers override Dem governor’s veto

Trump stays on sidelines as GOP falters in push to unite on healthcare plan

Neighbors of slain MIT professor stunned by killing

Brown University shooting probe faces hurdles after campus empties out as witnesses scatter: former FBI agent

Another One: NC Repeat Offender and Murderer Who Served Just 5 Years Has Been Arrested for Killing Woman, 74, After Hijacking Ambulance

The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.

Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.