Under a long-term deal sealed by the Obama administration, a Chinese Communist company was set to control the second-busiest container port in the United States. In an unreported Trump administration victory, the Communists are out after a drawn-out national security review forced a unit of China-based COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. (Orient Overseas Container Line—OOCL) to sell the cherished container terminal business, which handles among the largest freight of imports into the U.S.
It all started with a 40-year container terminal lease between the Port of Long Beach in southern California and Hong Kong. The Obama administration proudly signed the agreement in 2012 giving China control of America’s second-largest container port behind the nearby Port of Los Angeles. One of the Trump administration’s first big moves was to get the Communists out of the Port of Long Beach. After a national security review and federal intervention, the Long Beach terminal business, which handles millions of containers annually, is finally being sold to an Australian company called Macquarie Infrastructure Partners. That essentially kills China’s decades-long contract with the Obama administration.
Halima Salman convicted of receiving ISIS military training in Syria, faces 10 years in prison
Harley-Davidson’s Decade-Long Electric Motorcycle Initiative Has Turned Disastrous
Rock Legend Donnie Iris Dies Less Than Three Weeks After Retiring from Performing
Federal officials identify 400 noncitizens registered to vote in Washington state: ‘Tip of the iceberg’
Cassidy Hutchinson avoids indictment after DOJ effort to charge her over Jan 6 testimony fails: sources
NYC Mocked as Mamdani Builds New ‘Sidewalk Sheds’ That Drain Water Toward Buildings, So Expensive City Refuses to Give Price Tag
Man accused of threatening to hijack United flight says it was a drunken joke
Report Claims Hegseth Has Asked GOP Candidate for Governor to Appoint Him to Senate Seat
Rep Tom Tiffany claims Kamala Harris’ visit signals weakness in David Crowley’s Wisconsin campaign
Russian diesel tankers close in on US ports as Trump, Putin deal triggers legal showdown
Watch: Outrageous Pro-El-Sayed Ad Blames Jewish State for Raising Price of Bananas, Eggs in Michigan
Haitian illegal immigrant charged in Walmart killing entered US via Biden parole program: DHS
Flavio Bolsonaro to be issued visa by State Department after fleeing Brazil
Right-Wing Presidential Candidate Flavio Bolsonaro Secretly Flees Brazil for US After Disputed Election: Report
Luxury real estate brothers sentenced to 30 years in prison for yearslong sex-trafficking scheme
The deal never should have been signed in the first place considering the facility’s size, significance and the national security issues associated with a hostile foreign government controlling it. The southern California port is the premier U.S. gateway for trans-Pacific trade, according to its website, and handles trade valued at more than $194 billion annually. It is one of the few ports that can accommodate the world’s largest vessels and serves 140 shipping lines with connections to 217 seaports around the world. The facility encompasses 3,200 acres with 31 miles of waterfront, 10 piers, 62 berths and 68 post-Panamax gantry cranes. In 2018, the Long Beach port handled more than 8 million container units, achieving the busiest year in its history.
Removing Chinese Communists from this essential port is a tremendous feat and a huge victory for U.S. national security. You’d never know it because the media, consumed with the impeachment debacle, has ignored this important achievement. The only coverage of the finalized transfer is found in Long Beach’s local newspaper, which published a brief article omitting important background information on the Trump administration’s work to take back the terminal from the Communists. The story makes it seem like a regular business transaction in which “a Chinese state-owned company, reached a deal to sell the terminal, one of the busiest in the port, for $1.78 billion.” The piece also quotes the Port of Long Beach’s deputy executive director saying that the transaction process was intricate and involved one of “our most valuable port assets.” Buried at the bottom of the article is a sentence mentioning that the U.S. government, which regulates mergers for antitrust and security reasons, stepped in and required COSCO to sell its rights to the container terminal.
Halima Salman convicted of receiving ISIS military training in Syria, faces 10 years in prison
Harley-Davidson’s Decade-Long Electric Motorcycle Initiative Has Turned Disastrous
Rock Legend Donnie Iris Dies Less Than Three Weeks After Retiring from Performing
Federal officials identify 400 noncitizens registered to vote in Washington state: ‘Tip of the iceberg’
Cassidy Hutchinson avoids indictment after DOJ effort to charge her over Jan 6 testimony fails: sources
NYC Mocked as Mamdani Builds New ‘Sidewalk Sheds’ That Drain Water Toward Buildings, So Expensive City Refuses to Give Price Tag
Man accused of threatening to hijack United flight says it was a drunken joke
Report Claims Hegseth Has Asked GOP Candidate for Governor to Appoint Him to Senate Seat
Rep Tom Tiffany claims Kamala Harris’ visit signals weakness in David Crowley’s Wisconsin campaign
Russian diesel tankers close in on US ports as Trump, Putin deal triggers legal showdown
Watch: Outrageous Pro-El-Sayed Ad Blames Jewish State for Raising Price of Bananas, Eggs in Michigan
Haitian illegal immigrant charged in Walmart killing entered US via Biden parole program: DHS
Flavio Bolsonaro to be issued visa by State Department after fleeing Brazil
Right-Wing Presidential Candidate Flavio Bolsonaro Secretly Flees Brazil for US After Disputed Election: Report
Luxury real estate brothers sentenced to 30 years in prison for yearslong sex-trafficking scheme
In the last few years China has bought cargo ports throughout the world, including in Latin America, the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Chinese-owned ports are located in Greece, Italy, Spain and other European locations. In sub-Saharan Africa there are dozens of existing or planned port projects funded or operated by China, according to a study that highlights the threat the Chinese investments present to U.S. influence in the region. One troubling analysis points out that “COSCO’s commercial expansion has created leverage for Beijing — leverage that has already resulted in countries that host COSCO ports adopting China’s position on key international issues.”
Story cited here.
