The New York Times reported Thursday evening that President Donald Trump ordered air and naval strikes against Iranian targets in response to the shooting down of a U.S. Navy drone earlier that day, but canceled them “abruptly.”
The Times reported:
President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
…
The operation was underway in its early stages when it was called off, a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to stand down, the official said.
…
It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.
The Times added a curious detail: “No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.”
Pelosi university speech interrupted by anti-Israel agitators: ‘Warmonger’
Arrested anti-Israel agitators claim ‘discrimination’ and ‘harassment’ in civil rights complaint
Thirsty for Equality
Falcons Torched for Picking Michael Penix Jr. in 2024 Draft, Leave Kirk Cousins ‘Shocked’ and ‘Disappointed’
Republican Registration in Swing State Skyrockets, Showing Where Trump Stands Against Biden
Trump’s legal team prepares to dissect first witness during cross-examination and more top headlines
Rep. Schiff reportedly robbed in San Francisco, forced to attend ritzy campaign dinner with no suit to wear
Biden’s capital gains tax proposal could crush the economy, experts say
GOP lawmakers demand major donors pull funding from Columbia over ‘antisemitic incidents’
Florida man arrested for allegedly pointing lasers at passenger aircraft at international airport: police
Officials knew Manhattan Project chemicals disposed improperly at Missouri sites, documents reveal
Alabama lawmakers advance bill that could lead to prosecution of librarians
It’s the 1950s All Over Again: GOP Turns to Nat’l Guard to Protect Minority Students from Radical Dems, Leftists
New Republican challenger to Elizabeth Warren says ‘no one has disappointed Massachusetts more’
NFL Pro Bowler Humbles Mouthy High Schooler with a Simple Question
Trump’s critics accused him of “cold feet.” But the fact that the administration did not try to stop the story also suggests it could have been leaked deliberately. Indeed, at least one other reporter claimed he had received similar information:
.@nytimes scooping me again. I was sitting on this information for six hours. Can confirm this reporting. https://t.co/SLgwuKeAO4
— Jim LaPorta (@JimLaPorta) June 21, 2019
Pelosi university speech interrupted by anti-Israel agitators: ‘Warmonger’
Arrested anti-Israel agitators claim ‘discrimination’ and ‘harassment’ in civil rights complaint
Thirsty for Equality
Falcons Torched for Picking Michael Penix Jr. in 2024 Draft, Leave Kirk Cousins ‘Shocked’ and ‘Disappointed’
Republican Registration in Swing State Skyrockets, Showing Where Trump Stands Against Biden
Trump’s legal team prepares to dissect first witness during cross-examination and more top headlines
Rep. Schiff reportedly robbed in San Francisco, forced to attend ritzy campaign dinner with no suit to wear
Biden’s capital gains tax proposal could crush the economy, experts say
GOP lawmakers demand major donors pull funding from Columbia over ‘antisemitic incidents’
Florida man arrested for allegedly pointing lasers at passenger aircraft at international airport: police
Officials knew Manhattan Project chemicals disposed improperly at Missouri sites, documents reveal
Alabama lawmakers advance bill that could lead to prosecution of librarians
It’s the 1950s All Over Again: GOP Turns to Nat’l Guard to Protect Minority Students from Radical Dems, Leftists
New Republican challenger to Elizabeth Warren says ‘no one has disappointed Massachusetts more’
NFL Pro Bowler Humbles Mouthy High Schooler with a Simple Question
Trump tweeted Thursday morning that “Iran made a very big mistake!”, but later suggested that the “mistake” may have simply been an accident. In the double meaning of the word “mistake,” he preserved both the threat of retaliation and the possibility of a diplomatic solution.
Regardless, Iran will know how close it was to being attacked, and still is.
Story cited here.
Scroll down to leave a comment:
