The New York Times reported Thursday evening that President Donald Trump ordered air and naval strikes against Iranian targets in response to the shooting down of a U.S. Navy drone earlier that day, but canceled them “abruptly.”
The Times reported:
President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
…
The operation was underway in its early stages when it was called off, a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to stand down, the official said.
…
It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.
The Times added a curious detail: “No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.”
Op-Ed: The Weight of a Word
Time enough at last: What’s next after the House passes bill to do away with Daylight Saving Time?
Democrats turn on congressional hopeful after ‘hiding’ LGBTQ+ views from Muslim voters
WATCH: Inside look at the dangerous cartel human smuggling tunnels still being used at border
Paul Pelosi charged with misdemeanor hit-and-run in Napa Valley
House Republicans Call for Investigation Into Mamdani Administration’s Possible Violation of Federal Law
US backs Iraq-Syria oil pipeline bypassing Strait of Hormuz
Over 100 Democrats voted to end aid to Israel. They’ve received nearly $11 million from AIPAC
WATCH: Felony suspect’s ocean getaway unravels after 90-minute standoff with lifeguards
Covert DNA sample from Colorado man’s trash revives 44-year-old Texas murder case: report
Don Lemon Claims People Are Begging Him to Run for President and He’s ‘Totally Serious’ About Doing It
Olive Garden’s Never-Ending Pasta Regulation Becomes Unlikely Election Integrity Rallying Point for Conservatives
Rubio’s call to combat global funders of far-left terrorism could put Singham in crosshairs
Darline Graham considering running for full a Senate term as memorial services set for Lindsey Graham: report
Appeals court sets September hearing over dismissal of James Comey and Letitia James cases
Trump’s critics accused him of “cold feet.” But the fact that the administration did not try to stop the story also suggests it could have been leaked deliberately. Indeed, at least one other reporter claimed he had received similar information:
.@nytimes scooping me again. I was sitting on this information for six hours. Can confirm this reporting. https://t.co/SLgwuKeAO4
— Jim LaPorta (@JimLaPorta) June 21, 2019
Op-Ed: The Weight of a Word
Time enough at last: What’s next after the House passes bill to do away with Daylight Saving Time?
Democrats turn on congressional hopeful after ‘hiding’ LGBTQ+ views from Muslim voters
WATCH: Inside look at the dangerous cartel human smuggling tunnels still being used at border
Paul Pelosi charged with misdemeanor hit-and-run in Napa Valley
House Republicans Call for Investigation Into Mamdani Administration’s Possible Violation of Federal Law
US backs Iraq-Syria oil pipeline bypassing Strait of Hormuz
Over 100 Democrats voted to end aid to Israel. They’ve received nearly $11 million from AIPAC
WATCH: Felony suspect’s ocean getaway unravels after 90-minute standoff with lifeguards
Covert DNA sample from Colorado man’s trash revives 44-year-old Texas murder case: report
Don Lemon Claims People Are Begging Him to Run for President and He’s ‘Totally Serious’ About Doing It
Olive Garden’s Never-Ending Pasta Regulation Becomes Unlikely Election Integrity Rallying Point for Conservatives
Rubio’s call to combat global funders of far-left terrorism could put Singham in crosshairs
Darline Graham considering running for full a Senate term as memorial services set for Lindsey Graham: report
Appeals court sets September hearing over dismissal of James Comey and Letitia James cases
Trump tweeted Thursday morning that “Iran made a very big mistake!”, but later suggested that the “mistake” may have simply been an accident. In the double meaning of the word “mistake,” he preserved both the threat of retaliation and the possibility of a diplomatic solution.
Regardless, Iran will know how close it was to being attacked, and still is.
Story cited here.
