The New York Times reported Thursday evening that President Donald Trump ordered air and naval strikes against Iranian targets in response to the shooting down of a U.S. Navy drone earlier that day, but canceled them “abruptly.”
The Times reported:
President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
…
The operation was underway in its early stages when it was called off, a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to stand down, the official said.
…
It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.
The Times added a curious detail: “No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.”
Retired Port Authority officers tell Mamdani, Hochul to stay away from Ground Zero on 9/11
Former California councilman’s corruption unmasked after FBI finds cash buried in backyard
El-Sayed’s Demeaning Usha Vance Comments Set Stage for Major Backfire with Key Demo
Mississippi mayor argues against lowering flag for Dolly Parton after her death
Obama Judge Once Again Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order
Dems face uphill battle in challenge to Georgia Congressional map under new SCOTUS rules
Fauci’s Gov’t Division Worked Hand in Glove with the CIA: Docs
Abdul El-Sayed peppered with questions on Hasan Piker link, fracture with Jewish Dems at Michigan convention
UN Told Merchant Ships Not to Arm Themselves Against Pirates as Piracy Escalates
NYC parolee accused of killing 2 in 48-hour robbery spree hauled in after manhunt, cops say
Seneca Nation leader calls Trump’s Lake America renaming ‘unpresidential,’ demands reversal
Video: Parent Trips Youth Football Player Who Was Headed for a Touchdown
Beer bandits swipe PBR truck hauling 50,000 cans in California, leaving brand pleading for help
Dem House hopeful’s delayed disclosure reveals mystery payments from Soros-linked groups
Trump touts access to 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil in deal he says will slash gas prices
Trump’s critics accused him of “cold feet.” But the fact that the administration did not try to stop the story also suggests it could have been leaked deliberately. Indeed, at least one other reporter claimed he had received similar information:
.@nytimes scooping me again. I was sitting on this information for six hours. Can confirm this reporting. https://t.co/SLgwuKeAO4
— Jim LaPorta (@JimLaPorta) June 21, 2019
Retired Port Authority officers tell Mamdani, Hochul to stay away from Ground Zero on 9/11
Former California councilman’s corruption unmasked after FBI finds cash buried in backyard
El-Sayed’s Demeaning Usha Vance Comments Set Stage for Major Backfire with Key Demo
Mississippi mayor argues against lowering flag for Dolly Parton after her death
Obama Judge Once Again Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order
Dems face uphill battle in challenge to Georgia Congressional map under new SCOTUS rules
Fauci’s Gov’t Division Worked Hand in Glove with the CIA: Docs
Abdul El-Sayed peppered with questions on Hasan Piker link, fracture with Jewish Dems at Michigan convention
UN Told Merchant Ships Not to Arm Themselves Against Pirates as Piracy Escalates
NYC parolee accused of killing 2 in 48-hour robbery spree hauled in after manhunt, cops say
Seneca Nation leader calls Trump’s Lake America renaming ‘unpresidential,’ demands reversal
Video: Parent Trips Youth Football Player Who Was Headed for a Touchdown
Beer bandits swipe PBR truck hauling 50,000 cans in California, leaving brand pleading for help
Dem House hopeful’s delayed disclosure reveals mystery payments from Soros-linked groups
Trump touts access to 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil in deal he says will slash gas prices
Trump tweeted Thursday morning that “Iran made a very big mistake!”, but later suggested that the “mistake” may have simply been an accident. In the double meaning of the word “mistake,” he preserved both the threat of retaliation and the possibility of a diplomatic solution.
Regardless, Iran will know how close it was to being attacked, and still is.
Story cited here.
