Finance News Opinons Politics

Trump Didn’t Start This Trade War, China Did

Before President Trump announced that he was imposing 25 percent tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods, he got encouragement from an unlikely source: Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

The Senate Democratic leader, who has little good to say about Trump most days, tweeted, “Hang tough on China, @realDonaldTrump. Don’t back down. Strength is the only way to win with China.”

That should have been a wake-up call for Beijing. When Chuck Schumer is tweeting support for Donald Trump, it’s time to cut a deal.


But China didn’t cut a deal — and now it is paying a price. Those who suggest Trump started this trade war with China have it backward. Beijing has been waging economic warfare on the United States for years — stealing our intellectual property, forcing our companies to transfer technology as a price of doing business in China and subsidizing state-owned enterprises to prevent U.S. businesses from competing in dozens of sectors of the Chinese economy.

The difference now is Chinese leaders are facing a president who is willing to fight back.


Walz mocked online after GOP lawmaker floats theory in heated hearing about why Kamala Harris chose him as VP
Fox News Poll: Voters give poor marks to economy, Congress and Trump
BREAKING: Kurds Open New Front Against Iranian Regime, Launch Major Ground Offensive
Watch: Schumer Repeatedly Struggles to Condemn Iran Strikes: ‘No One Wants a Nuclear Israel’
Planning committee expecting outrage at White House ballroom meeting after 9,000 pages of negative comments
GOP begs Trump to endorse Cornyn as president teases decision ‘soon’
White House and State Department defend evacuation strategies for US citizens
Man dies after sneaking into closed section of popular national park
Hegseth Explains Utter Devastation of Iranian Regime’s Defenses – U.S. Close to ‘Uncontested’ Control of Airspace
Trump teases kingmaker endorsement in Texas ‘soon’ to force other candidate out of runoff
Leavitt says ground troops in Iran not currently being considered, doesn’t rule it out
Man killed in Texas after Border Patrol checkpoint flight and shootout
Fact Check: No, Hegseth Did Not Indicate Boots Would Be on the Ground in Iran
Spain urges Trump not to ‘play Russian roulette’ with ‘destiny of millions’ in Iran
NATO defenses shoot down Iranian missile fired toward Turkey, defense ministry says

See also  The US and Israel attacked Iran: What we know

China apparently didn’t think Trump would do so. The Wall Street Journal reports that Chinese negotiators believed they had leverage because Trump “was worried about the future course of the U.S. economy and therefore may be more eager to do a deal.”

Big mistake. The U.S. economy is strong, unemployment is at the lowest level in five decades, and wages are rising. In fact, America’s biggest economic problem is that we have more job openings than unemployed people to fill them.

Our economic strength against China’s relative weakness gives Trump leverage in this standoff, and he is using it.

China’s economy, by contrast, is in trouble. Last year, China reported its slowest economic growth since 1990, and the Financial Times reports that many experts “believe its official data understates the true extent of the slowdown.”

While the United States has added about half a million manufacturing jobs since Trump took office, China’s manufacturing sector is shedding jobs. And the Chinese population is aging rapidly as birthrates are falling, which means the workforce is becoming smaller and less productive.

Our economic strength against China’s relative weakness gives Trump leverage in this standoff, and he is using it. Trump knows the United States can better withstand a trade war than China and that President Xi Jinping needs a deal more than he does.

Trump is wrong when he says tariffs are good for our economy because China is paying us “hundreds of billions of dollars” in tariff revenue — money he can use to help farmers withstand the blow of lost sales to Beijing.

See also  Bill and Hillary Clinton to sit for back-to-back House Oversight depositions over Epstein ties


Walz mocked online after GOP lawmaker floats theory in heated hearing about why Kamala Harris chose him as VP
Fox News Poll: Voters give poor marks to economy, Congress and Trump
BREAKING: Kurds Open New Front Against Iranian Regime, Launch Major Ground Offensive
Watch: Schumer Repeatedly Struggles to Condemn Iran Strikes: ‘No One Wants a Nuclear Israel’
Planning committee expecting outrage at White House ballroom meeting after 9,000 pages of negative comments
GOP begs Trump to endorse Cornyn as president teases decision ‘soon’
White House and State Department defend evacuation strategies for US citizens
Man dies after sneaking into closed section of popular national park
Hegseth Explains Utter Devastation of Iranian Regime’s Defenses – U.S. Close to ‘Uncontested’ Control of Airspace
Trump teases kingmaker endorsement in Texas ‘soon’ to force other candidate out of runoff
Leavitt says ground troops in Iran not currently being considered, doesn’t rule it out
Man killed in Texas after Border Patrol checkpoint flight and shootout
Fact Check: No, Hegseth Did Not Indicate Boots Would Be on the Ground in Iran
Spain urges Trump not to ‘play Russian roulette’ with ‘destiny of millions’ in Iran
NATO defenses shoot down Iranian missile fired toward Turkey, defense ministry says

China is not paying the cost of tariffs. American businesses and consumers are paying. But the fact that Trump mistakenly believes tariffs are good for the economy should be a wake-up call for Beijing. He thinks he’s in a win-win situation, and that means, in this game of chicken, Trump is not going to blink.

See also  ‘Create a crisis’: Mainstream professor group partners with DSA to unleash anti-ICE chaos on campuses

And while China is not paying the cost of the tariffs, their impact on U.S. consumers may not be as bad as some observers predict. As my American Enterprise Institute colleague Derek Scissors points out, our low rate of inflation neutralizes much of the costs of higher prices from tariffs, which will diminish over time.

“If the US places 25% tariffs on all Chinese imports and no substitution for those goods and services occurs, the additional cost would be $145 billion. That’s a bit over one percent of 2018 consumer spending,” Scissors writes, but “the cost will certainly not that be that high, because substitution will occur. And the cost will fall over time as more producers enter to replace Chinese.”

In other words, our dynamic, growing, low-inflation economy can handle a trade war with China. That does not mean China will buckle easily. State ownership is the means by which the Communist Party directs the Chinese economy. Getting China to stop subsidizing large sectors of its economy, and to cease its theft of U.S. intellectual property, will be extremely difficult.

But Trump knows he has no chance of doing so by filing complaints with the World Trade Organization. He is right to take a hardline stance.

It’s much easier to question the wisdom of launching trade wars with allies such as Canada and the European Union. But we should all be able to agree that China is an economic predator against which we need to fight back.

Trump is using tariffs to force China to open its markets to free trade and competition. Every American should be standing behind the president as he does so – just like Chuck Schumer.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter