News Opinons Politics

Trump Defense Team To Wrap Up Impeachment Defense

President Trump’s lawyers will wrap up their arguments in his Senate impeachment trial on Tuesday, capping an aggressive three-day defense against the House impeachment managers’ case.

An official familiar with the defense team’s plans said that the lawyers plan to present for roughly two to three hours on Tuesday beginning at 1 p.m., meaning the Senate proceedings are likely to end early Tuesday after several longer days in the impeachment trial.

The person indicated Tuesday’s presentation would lean heavily on White House counsel Pat Cipollone and Trump’s personal attorney Jay Sekulow but said others on the legal team may also have speaking roles during the proceedings.

Trump’s legal team, comprised of a mix of White House lawyers, the president’s personal attorneys and high-profile names, is expected to spend considerably less of the time allotted to them — 24 hours over three days — than the House Democratic impeachment managers who presented their case at the start of the trial last week.


The legal team’s strategy has been manifold: the lawyers have sought to portray Democrats’ case as lacking or ignoring evidence; attacked the impeachment as a partisan exercise designed to bruise Trump; asserted that Trump is not guilty of what he is accused of; and argued that the offenses alleged do not rise to the level of impeachable conduct, even if proven.


Chinese national in blue state charged with illegally voting in federal election under another man’s name: DOJ
WNBA Subreddit Bans Fans from Even Mentioning Sophie Cunningham After Her Defense of Women’s Sports
Man Once Given ‘Outstanding Refugee’ Award by Minnesota Charged in Massive Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Trump threatens ‘unprecedented’ economic consequences for any nation aiding Iran
El-Sayed reveals he would go ‘step further’ than Sanders on socialist plan for major US industry
Pollster Who Had Thanksgiving-Hating Socialist Up 23 Points Closes Up Shop, Admits to Bungling Wisconsin Race
Colorado black bear dies after becoming trapped inside unlocked car for days: report
The False Moderates, Part 3: Dems Want to Turn Iowa into Illinois, And They’ve Found the Perfect Candidate
Manhunt intensifies for armed woman after veteran Massachusetts police officer found dead at home
Darline Graham Nordone debate fumble spotlights questions on policy views
Trump’s approval rating plummets to new low ahead of critical midterms: ‘More work to do’
Clarence Thomas chokes up as he reveals promise he made after grandparents’ sudden deaths
Ex-counterterrorism chief advocates for Trump to ‘walk away from’ Iran war, yank troops out of Middle East
Trump says he will meet with Kim Jong Un ‘later this year’
US ally on Putin’s doorstep braces for war as Russia tensions take ominous turn

See also  Appeals court upholds limits on warrantless ICE arrests at churches

The team also spent a good deal of Monday’s proceedings zeroing in on the Biden family in a bid to legitimize Trump’s decision to raise the family during the July 25 call he made from the White House to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which is at the center of the impeachment inquiry.

The House has accused Trump of abusing his power by soliciting Ukraine to investigate a political rival, though the White House has maintained that the president raised former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter on the call to Zelensky out of concern for corruption.

It’s unclear precisely how the defense will focus their arguments on Tuesday. Following opening arguments from both sides, the chamber will proceed to a new stage of the trial in which senators will get to ask questions.

Republican senators indicated the chamber would wait until Wednesday to begin asking questions of each side to allow lawmakers to review the six days’ worth of presentations from House managers and the president’s lawyers.

Senators will have a total of 16 hours to ask questions, after which they will move to the question that has loomed over the trial since the beginning: whether or not to hear new testimony and evidence.

A Sunday New York Times report that former national security adviser John Bolton wrote in his forthcoming memoir that Trump told him in August he did not want to release security aid for Ukraine unless the country agreed to help investigate his political rivals has roiled the impeachment proceedings.

See also  Appeals court upholds limits on warrantless ICE arrests at churches

Bolton’s reported account, which Trump has denied, called into question assertions by the president’s attorneys that Trump did not link the security assistance to investigations into the Bidens and a debunked theory about Ukraine’s involvement in 2016 election interference.


Chinese national in blue state charged with illegally voting in federal election under another man’s name: DOJ
WNBA Subreddit Bans Fans from Even Mentioning Sophie Cunningham After Her Defense of Women’s Sports
Man Once Given ‘Outstanding Refugee’ Award by Minnesota Charged in Massive Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Trump threatens ‘unprecedented’ economic consequences for any nation aiding Iran
El-Sayed reveals he would go ‘step further’ than Sanders on socialist plan for major US industry
Pollster Who Had Thanksgiving-Hating Socialist Up 23 Points Closes Up Shop, Admits to Bungling Wisconsin Race
Colorado black bear dies after becoming trapped inside unlocked car for days: report
The False Moderates, Part 3: Dems Want to Turn Iowa into Illinois, And They’ve Found the Perfect Candidate
Manhunt intensifies for armed woman after veteran Massachusetts police officer found dead at home
Darline Graham Nordone debate fumble spotlights questions on policy views
Trump’s approval rating plummets to new low ahead of critical midterms: ‘More work to do’
Clarence Thomas chokes up as he reveals promise he made after grandparents’ sudden deaths
Ex-counterterrorism chief advocates for Trump to ‘walk away from’ Iran war, yank troops out of Middle East
Trump says he will meet with Kim Jong Un ‘later this year’
US ally on Putin’s doorstep braces for war as Russia tensions take ominous turn

See also  Appeals court upholds limits on warrantless ICE arrests at churches

Democrats have pointed to the manuscript to bolster their argument that Bolton should testify in the trial, but it’s unclear if Republicans will be swayed.

Trump’s legal team largely ignored the Bolton revelations until the final hour of Monday’s proceedings, when Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard law professor emeritus, asserted that the former top aide’s allegations against Trump, even if true, would not amount to an impeachable offense.

“That is clear from the history. That is clear from the language of the Constitution,” Dershowitz, an opinion contributor to The Hill, said. “You cannot turn conduct that is not impeachable into impeachable conduct simply by using words like ‘quid pro quo’ and ‘personal benefit.’”

Dershowitz explained in detail his argument, contested among legal experts, that impeachment requires “criminal-like conduct.”

Dershowitz, who has maintained he is not a political supporter of Trump but joined the defense to defend the Constitution, was spotted at the White House on Tuesday during Trump’s joint remarks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announcing his administration’s Middle Peace plan.

As GOP senators seek to close ranks and avoid a drawn out trial with witnesses, some have suggested they should get access to Bolton’s manuscript so they can review the claims for themselves.

In any case, the former national security adviser is likely to play a prominent role in the next phase of the trial.

“It seems like every day, some new revelation emphasizes our request for relevant witnesses and documents in this trial and gives it momentum,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters. “There’s been a steady drip drip drip of information.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter