President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign sued The New York Times for libel on Wednesday, alleging the paper falsely reported about collusion between the president and Russia.
The lawsuit, filed in New York state court, claims the news organization “knowingly published false and defamatory statements” about Trump claiming he had an “overarching deal” with “Vladimir Putin’s oligarchy” to “help in the campaign against Hillary Clinton.”
“The statements were and are 100 percent false and defamatory,” Jenna Ellis, a lawyer for the campaign, said in a statement, The Hill reported.
“The complaint alleges The Times was aware of the falsity at the time it published them, but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign, while misleading its own readers in the process,” Ellis added.
The complaint notes The Times’ “own previous reporting had confirmed the falsity of these statements.”
Iran hackers taunted ‘Mr. Mustache’ John Bolton about stolen files that were allegedly classified
Watch: Karoline Leavitt Hits Back at Mamdani After He Pins Election Day Bomb Threats on Trump
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to where we stand with a potential break in the government shutdown
Trump Promises Criminal Investigation Into California Redistricting Vote: ‘GIANT SCAM’
Verizon to change its policies after Arctic Frost spying revelations
Schumer performs final Mamdani sidestep ahead of NYC polls closing
Zelensky says Trump will work to end Hungarian veto on Ukraine entering EU
Watch: David Hogg Meets His Match as Scott Jennings Schools Him on the Truth About Obamacare
Abbott vows to impose a ‘100% tariff’ on anyone moving from NYC to Texas after Election Day
Virginia GOP attorney general promotes splitting vote, snubbing fellow Republican Earle-Sears
Be Prepared for Left’s Manufactured ‘Vibe Shift’ Targeted at Trump as Election Results Roll In
Records reveal Chicago mayor’s ‘gift room’ was constructed after investigators turned away
Car used by missing California girl’s mom on road trip had license plates swapped to ‘avoid detection’
Emails contradict Comey’s sworn denials about leaks to media, prosecutors say
Trump asserts that any Jewish person who votes for ‘self professed Jew hater’ Mamdani is ‘a stupid person’
“But The Times published these statements anyway, knowing them to be false, and knowing it would misinform and mislead its own readers, because of The Times’ extreme bias against and animosity toward the Campaign, and The Times’ exuberance to improperly influence the presidential election in November 2020.”
The Trump campaign’s legal team pointed specifically to an Op-Ed by Max Frankel titled “The Real Trump-Russia Quid Pro Quo,” published March 27, as the source of the defamation against the president’s election team.
In the article, Frankel, who served as The Times’ executive editor from 1986 to 1994, claimed, “There was no need for detailed electoral collusion between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin’s oligarchy because they had an overarching deal: the quid of help in the campaign against Hillary Clinton for the quo of a new pro-Russian foreign policy, starting with relief from the Obama administration’s burdensome economic sanctions.
“The Trumpites knew about the quid and held out the prospect of the quo.”
The complaint highlights the fact that Frankel offered no proof to back up his claims of Trump-Russia collusion.
Further, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, released on April 18, found no evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Iran hackers taunted ‘Mr. Mustache’ John Bolton about stolen files that were allegedly classified
Watch: Karoline Leavitt Hits Back at Mamdani After He Pins Election Day Bomb Threats on Trump
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to where we stand with a potential break in the government shutdown
Trump Promises Criminal Investigation Into California Redistricting Vote: ‘GIANT SCAM’
Verizon to change its policies after Arctic Frost spying revelations
Schumer performs final Mamdani sidestep ahead of NYC polls closing
Zelensky says Trump will work to end Hungarian veto on Ukraine entering EU
Watch: David Hogg Meets His Match as Scott Jennings Schools Him on the Truth About Obamacare
Abbott vows to impose a ‘100% tariff’ on anyone moving from NYC to Texas after Election Day
Virginia GOP attorney general promotes splitting vote, snubbing fellow Republican Earle-Sears
Be Prepared for Left’s Manufactured ‘Vibe Shift’ Targeted at Trump as Election Results Roll In
Records reveal Chicago mayor’s ‘gift room’ was constructed after investigators turned away
Car used by missing California girl’s mom on road trip had license plates swapped to ‘avoid detection’
Emails contradict Comey’s sworn denials about leaks to media, prosecutors say
Trump asserts that any Jewish person who votes for ‘self professed Jew hater’ Mamdani is ‘a stupid person’
In a letter to congressional leaders summarizing Mueller’s findings made public on March 24 (three days before Frankel’s story), Attorney General William Barr quoted directly from the full report regarding collusion.
“The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” Barr quoted the report as saying.
The Trump complaint faults The Times for failing to reach out to them for a response prior to publishing its “defamatory article,” which offers “further evidence of The Times’ actual malice.”
“The Times decided to publish the Defamatory Article when it did, in advance of the Mueller Report, knowing that the Mueller Report was likely to exonerate the Campaign from allegations of collusion with Russia regarding the 2016 election,” the complaint reads.
“Once the Mueller Report was released, The Times knew that any claims of conspiracy would not be credible.”
The Frankel story is part of a larger effort to undermine the campaign, according to the Trump campaign’s lawyers.
The paper “has engaged in a systematic pattern of bias against the Campaign, designed to maliciously interfere with and damage its reputation and seek to cause the organization to fail.”
“There is extensive evidence that The Times is extremely biased against the campaign, and against Republicans in general,” the complaint further reads. “This evidence includes, among other things, the fact that The Times has endorsed the Democrat in every United States presidential election of the past sixty (60) years.”
Iran hackers taunted ‘Mr. Mustache’ John Bolton about stolen files that were allegedly classified
Watch: Karoline Leavitt Hits Back at Mamdani After He Pins Election Day Bomb Threats on Trump
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to where we stand with a potential break in the government shutdown
Trump Promises Criminal Investigation Into California Redistricting Vote: ‘GIANT SCAM’
Verizon to change its policies after Arctic Frost spying revelations
Schumer performs final Mamdani sidestep ahead of NYC polls closing
Zelensky says Trump will work to end Hungarian veto on Ukraine entering EU
Watch: David Hogg Meets His Match as Scott Jennings Schools Him on the Truth About Obamacare
Abbott vows to impose a ‘100% tariff’ on anyone moving from NYC to Texas after Election Day
Virginia GOP attorney general promotes splitting vote, snubbing fellow Republican Earle-Sears
Be Prepared for Left’s Manufactured ‘Vibe Shift’ Targeted at Trump as Election Results Roll In
Records reveal Chicago mayor’s ‘gift room’ was constructed after investigators turned away
Car used by missing California girl’s mom on road trip had license plates swapped to ‘avoid detection’
Emails contradict Comey’s sworn denials about leaks to media, prosecutors say
Trump asserts that any Jewish person who votes for ‘self professed Jew hater’ Mamdani is ‘a stupid person’
The Times responded to the lawsuit on Wednesday after its filing.
“The Trump campaign has turned to the courts to try to punish an opinion writer for having an opinion they find unacceptable,” Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for The Times, said in a statement.
“Fortunately, the law protects the right of Americans to express their judgments and conclusions, especially about events of public importance,” she added. “We look forward to vindicating that right in this case.”
Story cited here.
