Former Republican congressman Trey Gowdy slammed the media and Rep. Adam Schiff as “an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California” for protesting Attorney General Bill Barr’s move to declassify documents related to the probe of the Trump campaign.
Gowdy reacted during a Wednesday appearance on “Fox & Friends” to Schiff calling Barr’s move “un-American,” despite once calling on President Obama to declassify Russia-related documents because “Trump won’t.”
“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff,” Gowdy said.
“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff.”
“What I find amusing is the duplicity with which the D.C. media covers these events. Remember 2016 and 2017, the front page of almost every major newspaper was some leak of classified information,” he continued. “They didn’t care about that. Now they’re concerned that Bill Barr as he looks into the origins of this investigation may disseminate classified information.
Two People Climb to the Top of Empire State Building Antenna, Fly Banner with Message
Coalition of 25 states sues Trump admin over Medicaid work rule designed to prevent fraud
Internal emails expose how July 4th bash is being derailed by Dem-run county: ‘Offensive’
Michelle Obama Went ‘Absolutely Ballistic’ and Blocked RFK Jr.’s Wife Cheryl Hines from Appearing in New Show: Report
McConnell was found ‘unconscious’ in home last month as condition remains unknown
Congressman Gets Mixed Response After Explaining Why He Disappeared for Four Months
Fox News Poll: A close Senate contest is brewing in Iowa
Meet the Poster Child for Why Birthright Citizenship Is Horrible: Rep. Ramirez – Born to an Illegal and Now Trashes America and Supporters Terrorists
Jayapal tells murder victims’ parents Congress has other things to do
West Coast state sheriff’s bait bike sting snares dozens of alleged thieves in just months
Mamdani walks back plan to increase NYPD headcount following DSA pressure
Road to America 250 starts with Ford: Exhibit at Union Station shows off iconic vehicles
Government watchdog targets ‘weapons of mass reproduction’ after Supreme Court ruling
Court keeps ‘Decoy Dan’ on Alaska ballot as expert warns ranked-choice system creates voter ‘traps’
Military Leaders Brief Trump on Plan for Full-Scale War in Iran: Report
“So Schiff, your expectations should be really low. The media, that is where you should be very disappointed in the duplicity you’ve seen over the last two years.”
This came amid Barr’s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, with Trump asking intelligence agencies to cooperate with the attorney general in the probe.
Many have pointed out that Schiff said the opposite just before Trump took office, tweeting: “President Obama can and must declassify as much as possible about Russia hacking our elections. Rest assured, Trump won’t.”
“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress,” Gowdy said.
“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress.”
“I know I spent a lot of time asking Jim Comey about the origins of the Russia probe. I was stunned to learn he had no idea Peter Strzok signed the initiation document,” he said. “I was stunned how little he knew about Chris Steele and why he was defrocked as an FBI source but later went back to Bruce Ohr. I don’t know which is worse, that they did not know, or did know and they are not leveling with us.”
The former chair of the House Oversight Committee added that he would now ask Brennan when the probe of Russian election interference efforts “became co-mingled with this belief that the Trump campaign was somehow in cahoots with Russia.”
Two People Climb to the Top of Empire State Building Antenna, Fly Banner with Message
Coalition of 25 states sues Trump admin over Medicaid work rule designed to prevent fraud
Internal emails expose how July 4th bash is being derailed by Dem-run county: ‘Offensive’
Michelle Obama Went ‘Absolutely Ballistic’ and Blocked RFK Jr.’s Wife Cheryl Hines from Appearing in New Show: Report
McConnell was found ‘unconscious’ in home last month as condition remains unknown
Congressman Gets Mixed Response After Explaining Why He Disappeared for Four Months
Fox News Poll: A close Senate contest is brewing in Iowa
Meet the Poster Child for Why Birthright Citizenship Is Horrible: Rep. Ramirez – Born to an Illegal and Now Trashes America and Supporters Terrorists
Jayapal tells murder victims’ parents Congress has other things to do
West Coast state sheriff’s bait bike sting snares dozens of alleged thieves in just months
Mamdani walks back plan to increase NYPD headcount following DSA pressure
Road to America 250 starts with Ford: Exhibit at Union Station shows off iconic vehicles
Government watchdog targets ‘weapons of mass reproduction’ after Supreme Court ruling
Court keeps ‘Decoy Dan’ on Alaska ballot as expert warns ranked-choice system creates voter ‘traps’
Military Leaders Brief Trump on Plan for Full-Scale War in Iran: Report
“Go back to the very beginning. What is the factual predicate for Russia? What is the factual predicate for believing the Trump campaign was involved?” he added. “I would go chronologically figure out what John Brennan knew and when.”
Story cited here.
