News Opinons Politics

Trey Gowdy Slams ‘Wannabe Senator’ Adam Schiff for Opposing Declassification of Russia Probe Documents


Former Republican congressman Trey Gowdy slammed the media and Rep. Adam Schiff as “an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California” for protesting Attorney General Bill Barr’s move to declassify documents related to the probe of the Trump campaign.

Gowdy reacted during a Wednesday appearance on “Fox & Friends” to Schiff calling Barr’s move “un-American,” despite once calling on President Obama to declassify Russia-related documents because “Trump won’t.”

“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff,” Gowdy said.


“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff.”

— Trey Gowdy

“What I find amusing is the duplicity with which the D.C. media covers these events. Remember 2016 and 2017, the front page of almost every major newspaper was some leak of classified information,” he continued. “They didn’t care about that. Now they’re concerned that Bill Barr as he looks into the origins of this investigation may disseminate classified information.


Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect’s most baffling Cabinet pick
Oprah town hall cost Harris campaign far more than initially claimed: report
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: ‘Warrior for Free Speech’
Wild video shows man swipe delivery truck with female employee still inside
Coast Guard detains more than 20 migrants on boat off California coast: report
Rules for Thee: IRS Agents, Gov’t Employees Owe Stunning $1.5 Billion in Back Taxes – Report
How the Amish Helped Trump Win Pennsylvania
‘Real Biological Differences’: Video of Female Body Builders Versus Teenage Boys Goes Viral
China’s Xi vows to work with Trump during meeting with Biden
North Carolina Democrats buck national trends to see statewide success
Bill Clinton suggests Democrats get ‘in better tune with non-college educated’
Library of Congress email systems hacked earlier this year by ‘foreign adversary’
How Lawmakers Can Cut Costs for Consumers, Small Businesses by Loosening Visa’s Financial Grip
Biden approves Ukraine using long-range US missiles as Russia targets infrastructure
Nine-Year-Old Boy Finds His Pet Dog Dead, Farmhand Allegedly Admits the Disturbing Truth During Confrontation
See also  McConnell successor shrouded in uncertainty ahead of monumental Senate vote

“So Schiff, your expectations should be really low. The media, that is where you should be very disappointed in the duplicity you’ve seen over the last two years.”

This came amid Barr’s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, with Trump asking intelligence agencies to cooperate with the attorney general in the probe.

Many have pointed out that Schiff said the opposite just before Trump took office, tweeting: “President Obama can and must declassify as much as possible about Russia hacking our elections. Rest assured, Trump won’t.”

“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress,” Gowdy said.

“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress.”

— Trey Gowdy

“I know I spent a lot of time asking Jim Comey about the origins of the Russia probe. I was stunned to learn he had no idea Peter Strzok signed the initiation document,” he said. “I was stunned how little he knew about Chris Steele and why he was defrocked as an FBI source but later went back to Bruce Ohr. I don’t know which is worse, that they did not know, or did know and they are not leveling with us.”

See also  The bureaucratic behemoth awaiting Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon

The former chair of the House Oversight Committee added that he would now ask Brennan when the probe of Russian election interference efforts “became co-mingled with this belief that the Trump campaign was somehow in cahoots with Russia.”


Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect’s most baffling Cabinet pick
Oprah town hall cost Harris campaign far more than initially claimed: report
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: ‘Warrior for Free Speech’
Wild video shows man swipe delivery truck with female employee still inside
Coast Guard detains more than 20 migrants on boat off California coast: report
Rules for Thee: IRS Agents, Gov’t Employees Owe Stunning $1.5 Billion in Back Taxes – Report
How the Amish Helped Trump Win Pennsylvania
‘Real Biological Differences’: Video of Female Body Builders Versus Teenage Boys Goes Viral
China’s Xi vows to work with Trump during meeting with Biden
North Carolina Democrats buck national trends to see statewide success
Bill Clinton suggests Democrats get ‘in better tune with non-college educated’
Library of Congress email systems hacked earlier this year by ‘foreign adversary’
How Lawmakers Can Cut Costs for Consumers, Small Businesses by Loosening Visa’s Financial Grip
Biden approves Ukraine using long-range US missiles as Russia targets infrastructure
Nine-Year-Old Boy Finds His Pet Dog Dead, Farmhand Allegedly Admits the Disturbing Truth During Confrontation

“Go back to the very beginning. What is the factual predicate for Russia? What is the factual predicate for believing the Trump campaign was involved?” he added. “I would go chronologically figure out what John Brennan knew and when.”

See also  Judges delay two Jan. 6 trials, citing Trump victory

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter