Former Republican congressman Trey Gowdy slammed the media and Rep. Adam Schiff as “an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California” for protesting Attorney General Bill Barr’s move to declassify documents related to the probe of the Trump campaign.
Gowdy reacted during a Wednesday appearance on “Fox & Friends” to Schiff calling Barr’s move “un-American,” despite once calling on President Obama to declassify Russia-related documents because “Trump won’t.”
“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff,” Gowdy said.
“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff.”
“What I find amusing is the duplicity with which the D.C. media covers these events. Remember 2016 and 2017, the front page of almost every major newspaper was some leak of classified information,” he continued. “They didn’t care about that. Now they’re concerned that Bill Barr as he looks into the origins of this investigation may disseminate classified information.
Republicans question Trump’s ‘privately funded’ ballroom after report points to taxpayer burden
WATCH: Unearthed video shows leftist Senate hopeful celebrating anti-fossil fuel group’s arrival in Texas
Delaware hospital shooting suspect identified, faces multiple charges including first-degree murder
Sick: PBS Bigwig Appears to Keep Job After Publicly Wishing Stroke on Trump in Deranged Birthday Message
Leftist Professor Goes Viral by Admitting the Hard Truth – Trump Has Destroyed Their Dreams and the Democratic Party Too
Judge reveals Luigi Mangione will pursue psychiatric defense in UnitedHealthcare CEO assassination case
12 Key Points on Iran Peace Deal Revealed, as Trump Says He’ll Likely Read It to Media So They Get It Right
Pentagon Sends Coast Guard to Rescue 2 Survivors After Latest Deadly Strike on Narco-Terrorists in Pacific
Oklahoma Democrats face runoff showdown in race for deep-red Senate seat
Deadly B-52 crash puts focus on engines, controllability as investigators hunt for answers
Trump says Senate hearing on DNI nominee is cancelled until US attorney replacement confirmed
Trump DNI pick braces for Senate grilling as temporary stand-in fuels Dem pressure
5 chilling details from the alleged White House attack plot tied to UFC event
Netanyahu’s relationship with Trump becomes baggage in reelection campaign
Canadian tourism to US begins to rebound after 51st state, tariffs debacle
“So Schiff, your expectations should be really low. The media, that is where you should be very disappointed in the duplicity you’ve seen over the last two years.”
This came amid Barr’s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, with Trump asking intelligence agencies to cooperate with the attorney general in the probe.
Many have pointed out that Schiff said the opposite just before Trump took office, tweeting: “President Obama can and must declassify as much as possible about Russia hacking our elections. Rest assured, Trump won’t.”
“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress,” Gowdy said.
“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress.”
“I know I spent a lot of time asking Jim Comey about the origins of the Russia probe. I was stunned to learn he had no idea Peter Strzok signed the initiation document,” he said. “I was stunned how little he knew about Chris Steele and why he was defrocked as an FBI source but later went back to Bruce Ohr. I don’t know which is worse, that they did not know, or did know and they are not leveling with us.”
The former chair of the House Oversight Committee added that he would now ask Brennan when the probe of Russian election interference efforts “became co-mingled with this belief that the Trump campaign was somehow in cahoots with Russia.”
Republicans question Trump’s ‘privately funded’ ballroom after report points to taxpayer burden
WATCH: Unearthed video shows leftist Senate hopeful celebrating anti-fossil fuel group’s arrival in Texas
Delaware hospital shooting suspect identified, faces multiple charges including first-degree murder
Sick: PBS Bigwig Appears to Keep Job After Publicly Wishing Stroke on Trump in Deranged Birthday Message
Leftist Professor Goes Viral by Admitting the Hard Truth – Trump Has Destroyed Their Dreams and the Democratic Party Too
Judge reveals Luigi Mangione will pursue psychiatric defense in UnitedHealthcare CEO assassination case
12 Key Points on Iran Peace Deal Revealed, as Trump Says He’ll Likely Read It to Media So They Get It Right
Pentagon Sends Coast Guard to Rescue 2 Survivors After Latest Deadly Strike on Narco-Terrorists in Pacific
Oklahoma Democrats face runoff showdown in race for deep-red Senate seat
Deadly B-52 crash puts focus on engines, controllability as investigators hunt for answers
Trump says Senate hearing on DNI nominee is cancelled until US attorney replacement confirmed
Trump DNI pick braces for Senate grilling as temporary stand-in fuels Dem pressure
5 chilling details from the alleged White House attack plot tied to UFC event
Netanyahu’s relationship with Trump becomes baggage in reelection campaign
Canadian tourism to US begins to rebound after 51st state, tariffs debacle
“Go back to the very beginning. What is the factual predicate for Russia? What is the factual predicate for believing the Trump campaign was involved?” he added. “I would go chronologically figure out what John Brennan knew and when.”
Story cited here.
