News Opinons Politics

Trey Gowdy Slams ‘Wannabe Senator’ Adam Schiff for Opposing Declassification of Russia Probe Documents

Former Republican congressman Trey Gowdy slammed the media and Rep. Adam Schiff as “an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California” for protesting Attorney General Bill Barr’s move to declassify documents related to the probe of the Trump campaign.

Gowdy reacted during a Wednesday appearance on “Fox & Friends” to Schiff calling Barr’s move “un-American,” despite once calling on President Obama to declassify Russia-related documents because “Trump won’t.”

“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff,” Gowdy said.


“Here’s the thing, Schiff is an overtly ambitious partisan wannabe senator from California. So your expectations should be exceedingly low for Adam Schiff.”

— Trey Gowdy

“What I find amusing is the duplicity with which the D.C. media covers these events. Remember 2016 and 2017, the front page of almost every major newspaper was some leak of classified information,” he continued. “They didn’t care about that. Now they’re concerned that Bill Barr as he looks into the origins of this investigation may disseminate classified information.


Secret Service offers glimpse into WHCA Dinner security after alleged Trump assassination attempt
French Modeling Scout with Ties to Epstein Found Dead Near Paris
Boasberg delivers fresh immigration setback to Trump in free-speech clash
‘So Devastated’: Hollywood Stars Mourn Death of 18-Year-Old Actress
Academics and CEOs dominate Fed advisory boards
28 for ’28: The open presidential race field could reach more than two dozen candidates
Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is clumsy, anachronistic, and badly acted
China’s routing of Biden in chip war with US created a communist tech giant
Witnesses recount ‘scary’ NYC stabbing after suspect allegedly yelled ‘Allahu Akbar’ during attacks
Multiple injured after floatplane makes emergency landing, catches fire off Washington coast
California mayor’s hot mic catches candid exchange after audience sends meeting off rails
Never Forget Dems Supported Large-Scale Deportations Until Trump Took Up the Issue – Just Listen to What Obama Said in 2014
Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman admits to sufficient facts in June drunken driving case
Rubio unveils visa restrictions targeting cybercrime networks
House Democrats Furious at Their Own Campaign Arm Over Expensive Primary Blunder
See also  Five dead after group attempts to save struggling swimmer in Ohio

“So Schiff, your expectations should be really low. The media, that is where you should be very disappointed in the duplicity you’ve seen over the last two years.”

This came amid Barr’s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, with Trump asking intelligence agencies to cooperate with the attorney general in the probe.

Many have pointed out that Schiff said the opposite just before Trump took office, tweeting: “President Obama can and must declassify as much as possible about Russia hacking our elections. Rest assured, Trump won’t.”

See also  Five dead after group attempts to save struggling swimmer in Ohio

“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress,” Gowdy said.

“I don’t know which is worse, that you give people all these powers that they have no idea who under them is using it, or the worst-case scenario, is that they may have misspoken when they gave their testimony before Congress.”

— Trey Gowdy

“I know I spent a lot of time asking Jim Comey about the origins of the Russia probe. I was stunned to learn he had no idea Peter Strzok signed the initiation document,” he said. “I was stunned how little he knew about Chris Steele and why he was defrocked as an FBI source but later went back to Bruce Ohr. I don’t know which is worse, that they did not know, or did know and they are not leveling with us.”

The former chair of the House Oversight Committee added that he would now ask Brennan when the probe of Russian election interference efforts “became co-mingled with this belief that the Trump campaign was somehow in cahoots with Russia.”


Secret Service offers glimpse into WHCA Dinner security after alleged Trump assassination attempt
French Modeling Scout with Ties to Epstein Found Dead Near Paris
Boasberg delivers fresh immigration setback to Trump in free-speech clash
‘So Devastated’: Hollywood Stars Mourn Death of 18-Year-Old Actress
Academics and CEOs dominate Fed advisory boards
28 for ’28: The open presidential race field could reach more than two dozen candidates
Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is clumsy, anachronistic, and badly acted
China’s routing of Biden in chip war with US created a communist tech giant
Witnesses recount ‘scary’ NYC stabbing after suspect allegedly yelled ‘Allahu Akbar’ during attacks
Multiple injured after floatplane makes emergency landing, catches fire off Washington coast
California mayor’s hot mic catches candid exchange after audience sends meeting off rails
Never Forget Dems Supported Large-Scale Deportations Until Trump Took Up the Issue – Just Listen to What Obama Said in 2014
Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman admits to sufficient facts in June drunken driving case
Rubio unveils visa restrictions targeting cybercrime networks
House Democrats Furious at Their Own Campaign Arm Over Expensive Primary Blunder
See also  Five dead after group attempts to save struggling swimmer in Ohio

“Go back to the very beginning. What is the factual predicate for Russia? What is the factual predicate for believing the Trump campaign was involved?” he added. “I would go chronologically figure out what John Brennan knew and when.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter