Lifestyle News Opinons Politics Riots

‘Titanic’ Blunder Leaves Biden in a Bad Spot, Might Be Forced to Give Massive Support to Trump


So far, radical Democrats have jumped at nearly every opportunity to cast blame on former President Donald Trump for the Jan. 6 incursion into the Capitol. But in a new twist, legal experts say President Joe Bidenā€™s Department of Justice may be forced to defend Trump in a lawsuit relating to Jan. 6.

Earlier this month, the Justice Departmentā€™s Civil Division acting head Brian Boynton argued in favor of Trump in a lawsuit against him coming from writer E. Jean Carroll. She accused Trump of sexual assault in 2019, but Trump asserted she was ā€œtotally lying.ā€

As a result of Trumpā€™s accusation, Carroll sued him for defamation. In a brief filed on June 7, Boynton said Trump was acting within the scope of his duties as president by responding to the allegations.


ā€œWhen members of the White House media asked then-President Trump to respond to Ms Carrollā€™s serious allegations of wrongdoing, their questions were posed to him in his capacity as President,ā€ he said.

ā€œLikewise, when Mr. Trump responded to those questions with denials of wrongdoing made through the White House press office or in statements to reporters in the Oval Office and on the White House lawn, he acted within the scope of his office.ā€

According to Reuters, attorney Philip Andonian fears that defense could have implications on the case he is bringing against Trump on behalf of California Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell.

Andonian said he found the DOJā€™s defense of Trump in the Carroll suit ā€œalarming.ā€ He fears that if the president is immune to legal consequences regarding what he says about matters of public concern, the DOJ may consider Trump immune from his comments on Jan. 6.

This is a hilariously ironic place for Bidenā€™s DOJ to be in. By defending Trump in a weak lawsuit brought by Carroll, the department may have inadvertently forced itself to defend Trump in a Jan. 6 lawsuit, as well.

ā€œIt would be very difficult for the Justice Department to change course now,ā€ Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe said. ā€œThe Titanic is aimed at the iceberg.ā€

Reuters characterized Tribe as ā€œa frequent critic of Trump.ā€ The outlet also reported he served as a legal adviser to House Democrats during their second impeachment trial for Trump.

This makes it even more notable that the professor admitted Bidenā€™s DOJ is in a tough position. If even Trump-haters are saying the DOJ may be forced to defend him, the possibility seems to be more believable.

Other experts feel the DOJ could still argue against Trump in the Jan. 6 lawsuit because the case has key differences from the Carroll suit. Joseph Sellers, an attorney representing Mississippi Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson in separate lawsuit regarding Jan. 6, said Trumpā€™s actions on that day were outside his responsibilities as president.

ā€œI donā€™t think anyone would think itā€™s within the scope of the presidentā€™s legitimate duties to encourage people to interfere with the functioning of another branch of government,ā€ Sellers said. ā€œHe was promoting an insurrection and a riot.ā€

There are two main roadblocks Democrats are facing with outstanding lawsuits against Trump for his actions on Jan. 6.

In addition to the possibility that the DOJ will back Trump, there is also a strong chance that prosecutors will be unable to prove Trumpā€™s actions ā€œincitedā€ the Capitol incursion, as Sellers alleged.

In his speech on Jan. 6, Trump told his supporters to ā€œfight like hellā€ and ensured them he had won the election, according to The Guardian. Those claims may be controversial, but they are far from a direct call for his supporters to riot.

The Guardian also reported the FBI made its disdain for the Jan. 6 incursion clear in a March hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee.

ā€œThat attack, that siege, was criminal behavior, plain and simple, and itā€™s behavior that we, the FBI, view as domestic terrorism,ā€ FBI director Chris Wray said at the hearing.

Even if the accusation of ā€œdomestic terrorismā€ is true of the people who entered the Capitol, it does not necessarily mean Trump incited their actions.

While it is not a guarantee that the DOJ will back Trump, prosecutors will have the burden of proving ā€œincitementā€ no matter what. Given the vague nature of the current evidence against Trump, this will be a difficult task.

Some, if not most, of the people who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 are likely to face punishment of some sort. Yet with each new development, a Trump conviction for the Jan. 6 incursion seems less and less likely.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

→ What are your thoughts? ←
Scroll down to leave a comment: