Are you kidding me?
I’m used to partisan, inaccurate drivel from all sides these days, but the media’s coverage of President Trump’s tariffs and the so-called “trade war” takes some kind of cake.
There’s no serious doubt that some in the media would absolutely love to tank the stock market. They figure that would hurt Trump’s re-election chances in 2020. Monday’s stock market slump, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) tumble 2.4% and the Nasdaq Composite 3.4%, looked just like what the doctor ordered.
I write this, incidentally, as someone who is no fan of the president. But I remember when politics was supposed to stop at the water’s edge.
And, anyway, facts are facts. Most of what the public is being told about these tariffs is either misleading or a downright lie.
I’ve been following the coverage all weekend with my jaw on the floor.
Uncle Sam benefits
Extremely Strange 25-Year-Old Connection Uncovered Between Dead Brown Shooting Suspect from Portugal and Murdered MIT Professor for Portugal
Video: Brown Univ. President Drops Astonishing Claim on Missing Cameras That Absolutely No One Believes
Noem announces pause on immigrant visa lottery that allowed alleged Brown shooter to enter US
Rubio unloads on ‘alarmists,’ touts State Dept disaster response after USAID closure
Rob Reiner, 1947–2025
North Carolina’s longest-serving governor dies at 88 after serving 4 terms in office
Milwaukee County judge found guilty of obstructing federal immigration agents in courthouse incident
BREAKING: Deceased Brown Shooting Suspect ID’d as 48-Year-Old Portuguese National, Student at Brown
US military strikes narco-terrorist vessels in latest Eastern Pacific drug trafficking operation
Maria Shriver slams Trump over Kennedy Center name change decision: ‘Beyond comprehension’
Minneapolis police chief blasts ICE after agent seen dragging woman through street, kneeling on her back
Claudio Manuel Neves-Valente identified as Brown University shooting suspect, found dead
Trump quietly signs sweeping $901B defense bill after bipartisan Senate passage
Justice Department prepares to drop trove of Epstein files as deadline looms
Erika Kirk vows to get Vance ‘elected for 48’ at AmericaFest
Yes, tariffs are “costs.” But they do not somehow destroy our money. They do not take our hard-earned dollars and burn them in a big pile. Tariffs are simply federal taxes. That’s it. The extra costs paid by importers, and consumers, goes to Uncle Sam, to distribute as he sees fit, including, for example, on Obamacare subsidies.
It wasn’t long ago the media was complaining because Trump was cutting taxes. Now it’s complaining he’s raising them. Confused? Me too.
And the amounts involved are trivial. Chicken feed.
President Trump just hiked tariffs from 10% to 25% on about $200 billion in Chinese imports. In other words, he just raised taxes by … $30 billion a year.
Oh, no!
The total amount we all paid in taxes last year — federal, state and local — was $5.51 trillion. This tax increase that has everyone’s panties in a twist is a rounding error.
Investors panic needlessly
Extremely Strange 25-Year-Old Connection Uncovered Between Dead Brown Shooting Suspect from Portugal and Murdered MIT Professor for Portugal
Video: Brown Univ. President Drops Astonishing Claim on Missing Cameras That Absolutely No One Believes
Noem announces pause on immigrant visa lottery that allowed alleged Brown shooter to enter US
Rubio unloads on ‘alarmists,’ touts State Dept disaster response after USAID closure
Rob Reiner, 1947–2025
North Carolina’s longest-serving governor dies at 88 after serving 4 terms in office
Milwaukee County judge found guilty of obstructing federal immigration agents in courthouse incident
BREAKING: Deceased Brown Shooting Suspect ID’d as 48-Year-Old Portuguese National, Student at Brown
US military strikes narco-terrorist vessels in latest Eastern Pacific drug trafficking operation
Maria Shriver slams Trump over Kennedy Center name change decision: ‘Beyond comprehension’
Minneapolis police chief blasts ICE after agent seen dragging woman through street, kneeling on her back
Claudio Manuel Neves-Valente identified as Brown University shooting suspect, found dead
Trump quietly signs sweeping $901B defense bill after bipartisan Senate passage
Justice Department prepares to drop trove of Epstein files as deadline looms
Erika Kirk vows to get Vance ‘elected for 48’ at AmericaFest
Meanwhile, the total value wiped off U.S. stocks during Monday’s panic was about $700 billion. More than 20 years’ worth of the new tariffs.
Even if Trump slapped 25% taxes on all Chinese imports, it would come to a tax hike of … $135 billion a year. U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) last year: $20.5 trillion.
So even this supposedly scary “escalation” of this “tariff war” would, er, raise our total tax bill from 26.9% of GDP all the way to 27.5% of GDP.
Oh, and isn’t it interesting to see some people’s priorities? Apparently the most shocking part of this trivial tax hike is that it might raise the price of new Apple (AAPL) iPhones.
Last I checked, these were luxury items, right?
U.S. consumers gain
Meanwhile, the trade spat seems to be bringing down food prices. China is going to take less of our farm products. So wheat prices are down 20% since the start of the year. Soybeans are at 10-year lows.
Good for consumers, right?
Extremely Strange 25-Year-Old Connection Uncovered Between Dead Brown Shooting Suspect from Portugal and Murdered MIT Professor for Portugal
Video: Brown Univ. President Drops Astonishing Claim on Missing Cameras That Absolutely No One Believes
Noem announces pause on immigrant visa lottery that allowed alleged Brown shooter to enter US
Rubio unloads on ‘alarmists,’ touts State Dept disaster response after USAID closure
Rob Reiner, 1947–2025
North Carolina’s longest-serving governor dies at 88 after serving 4 terms in office
Milwaukee County judge found guilty of obstructing federal immigration agents in courthouse incident
BREAKING: Deceased Brown Shooting Suspect ID’d as 48-Year-Old Portuguese National, Student at Brown
US military strikes narco-terrorist vessels in latest Eastern Pacific drug trafficking operation
Maria Shriver slams Trump over Kennedy Center name change decision: ‘Beyond comprehension’
Minneapolis police chief blasts ICE after agent seen dragging woman through street, kneeling on her back
Claudio Manuel Neves-Valente identified as Brown University shooting suspect, found dead
Trump quietly signs sweeping $901B defense bill after bipartisan Senate passage
Justice Department prepares to drop trove of Epstein files as deadline looms
Erika Kirk vows to get Vance ‘elected for 48’ at AmericaFest
No, no, of course not! Silly you. This is also bad news … for farmers!
And all this ignores the much bigger picture, anyway.
The tariffs are simply a means to an end. The president is trying to get China to start buying more of our stuff. He knows the so-called Middle Kingdom, which now has the second-biggest economy in the world, responds to incentives more than to nice words. These tariffs give China an incentive to open up.
OK, so China’s first reaction is just to retaliate. Big deal. That’s just posturing.
Right now we export less to China than we do to Japan, South Korea and Singapore put together. That’s the point. So the effect of China’s new tariffs on the U.S. are yet another rounding error. Even if China banned all imports from the U.S., that would amount to only 0.6% of our gross domestic product. And we’d sell the stuff somewhere else.
Don’t buy the hysteria. President Trump is simply trying to pressure our biggest competitor to buy more American goods. That should be a good thing, even if you don’t like him.
Story cited here.
