Are you kidding me?
I’m used to partisan, inaccurate drivel from all sides these days, but the media’s coverage of President Trump’s tariffs and the so-called “trade war” takes some kind of cake.
There’s no serious doubt that some in the media would absolutely love to tank the stock market. They figure that would hurt Trump’s re-election chances in 2020. Monday’s stock market slump, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) tumble 2.4% and the Nasdaq Composite 3.4%, looked just like what the doctor ordered.
I write this, incidentally, as someone who is no fan of the president. But I remember when politics was supposed to stop at the water’s edge.
And, anyway, facts are facts. Most of what the public is being told about these tariffs is either misleading or a downright lie.
I’ve been following the coverage all weekend with my jaw on the floor.
Uncle Sam benefits
FAA restricts Texas airspace after Pentagon reportedly strikes down Customs and Border Protection drone
Federal prosecutor admits ‘extraordinary’ timing in Abrego Garcia smuggling case charges
Trump pushes Congress to pass SAVE Act during State of the Union: ‘So we’ll see how it goes’
BREAKING VIDEO: Minnesota Lawmakers Have Drawn up Impeachment Articles Against Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
Alleged Tren de Aragua criminal gang members charged in ATM robberies across New England
Atlanta-area police blast parents over vodka martini packed in school lunch: ‘That is NOT apple juice’
Vulnerable House Dem lashes out at Trump’s ‘racist’ SOTU challenge: ‘That was uncomfortable’
Mamdani’s Stylist Mocked After Leaving First-Class Plane Seat to Avoid Sitting with White People: ‘Just Like Rosa Parks’
Target Pays $110 Million to Break Minneapolis Lease Amid Chaos in the City
Kennedy warns Ayatollah wants to ‘drink our blood out of a boot’ as Iran tensions escalate
BREAKING VIDEO: Hillary Flees Mic 4 Seconds After Reporter Dares Ask Why Ghislaine Maxwell Was at Chelsea’s Wedding in 2010
DHS agent says Abrego Garcia human smuggling case grew ‘stronger’ after investigation
Hillary Clinton comes out swinging after GOP grilled her during marathon Epstein deposition
Another New York Yankee is Having His Number Retired and Will Join an Exclusive Club of Legends
COVID HANGOVER: New Research Suggests Most Schools Haven’t Recovered from Lockdowns, and the Academic Numbers Are Devastating
Yes, tariffs are “costs.” But they do not somehow destroy our money. They do not take our hard-earned dollars and burn them in a big pile. Tariffs are simply federal taxes. That’s it. The extra costs paid by importers, and consumers, goes to Uncle Sam, to distribute as he sees fit, including, for example, on Obamacare subsidies.
It wasn’t long ago the media was complaining because Trump was cutting taxes. Now it’s complaining he’s raising them. Confused? Me too.
And the amounts involved are trivial. Chicken feed.
President Trump just hiked tariffs from 10% to 25% on about $200 billion in Chinese imports. In other words, he just raised taxes by … $30 billion a year.
Oh, no!
The total amount we all paid in taxes last year — federal, state and local — was $5.51 trillion. This tax increase that has everyone’s panties in a twist is a rounding error.
Investors panic needlessly
FAA restricts Texas airspace after Pentagon reportedly strikes down Customs and Border Protection drone
Federal prosecutor admits ‘extraordinary’ timing in Abrego Garcia smuggling case charges
Trump pushes Congress to pass SAVE Act during State of the Union: ‘So we’ll see how it goes’
BREAKING VIDEO: Minnesota Lawmakers Have Drawn up Impeachment Articles Against Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
Alleged Tren de Aragua criminal gang members charged in ATM robberies across New England
Atlanta-area police blast parents over vodka martini packed in school lunch: ‘That is NOT apple juice’
Vulnerable House Dem lashes out at Trump’s ‘racist’ SOTU challenge: ‘That was uncomfortable’
Mamdani’s Stylist Mocked After Leaving First-Class Plane Seat to Avoid Sitting with White People: ‘Just Like Rosa Parks’
Target Pays $110 Million to Break Minneapolis Lease Amid Chaos in the City
Kennedy warns Ayatollah wants to ‘drink our blood out of a boot’ as Iran tensions escalate
BREAKING VIDEO: Hillary Flees Mic 4 Seconds After Reporter Dares Ask Why Ghislaine Maxwell Was at Chelsea’s Wedding in 2010
DHS agent says Abrego Garcia human smuggling case grew ‘stronger’ after investigation
Hillary Clinton comes out swinging after GOP grilled her during marathon Epstein deposition
Another New York Yankee is Having His Number Retired and Will Join an Exclusive Club of Legends
COVID HANGOVER: New Research Suggests Most Schools Haven’t Recovered from Lockdowns, and the Academic Numbers Are Devastating
Meanwhile, the total value wiped off U.S. stocks during Monday’s panic was about $700 billion. More than 20 years’ worth of the new tariffs.
Even if Trump slapped 25% taxes on all Chinese imports, it would come to a tax hike of … $135 billion a year. U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) last year: $20.5 trillion.
So even this supposedly scary “escalation” of this “tariff war” would, er, raise our total tax bill from 26.9% of GDP all the way to 27.5% of GDP.
Oh, and isn’t it interesting to see some people’s priorities? Apparently the most shocking part of this trivial tax hike is that it might raise the price of new Apple (AAPL) iPhones.
Last I checked, these were luxury items, right?
U.S. consumers gain
Meanwhile, the trade spat seems to be bringing down food prices. China is going to take less of our farm products. So wheat prices are down 20% since the start of the year. Soybeans are at 10-year lows.
Good for consumers, right?
FAA restricts Texas airspace after Pentagon reportedly strikes down Customs and Border Protection drone
Federal prosecutor admits ‘extraordinary’ timing in Abrego Garcia smuggling case charges
Trump pushes Congress to pass SAVE Act during State of the Union: ‘So we’ll see how it goes’
BREAKING VIDEO: Minnesota Lawmakers Have Drawn up Impeachment Articles Against Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
Alleged Tren de Aragua criminal gang members charged in ATM robberies across New England
Atlanta-area police blast parents over vodka martini packed in school lunch: ‘That is NOT apple juice’
Vulnerable House Dem lashes out at Trump’s ‘racist’ SOTU challenge: ‘That was uncomfortable’
Mamdani’s Stylist Mocked After Leaving First-Class Plane Seat to Avoid Sitting with White People: ‘Just Like Rosa Parks’
Target Pays $110 Million to Break Minneapolis Lease Amid Chaos in the City
Kennedy warns Ayatollah wants to ‘drink our blood out of a boot’ as Iran tensions escalate
BREAKING VIDEO: Hillary Flees Mic 4 Seconds After Reporter Dares Ask Why Ghislaine Maxwell Was at Chelsea’s Wedding in 2010
DHS agent says Abrego Garcia human smuggling case grew ‘stronger’ after investigation
Hillary Clinton comes out swinging after GOP grilled her during marathon Epstein deposition
Another New York Yankee is Having His Number Retired and Will Join an Exclusive Club of Legends
COVID HANGOVER: New Research Suggests Most Schools Haven’t Recovered from Lockdowns, and the Academic Numbers Are Devastating
No, no, of course not! Silly you. This is also bad news … for farmers!
And all this ignores the much bigger picture, anyway.
The tariffs are simply a means to an end. The president is trying to get China to start buying more of our stuff. He knows the so-called Middle Kingdom, which now has the second-biggest economy in the world, responds to incentives more than to nice words. These tariffs give China an incentive to open up.
OK, so China’s first reaction is just to retaliate. Big deal. That’s just posturing.
Right now we export less to China than we do to Japan, South Korea and Singapore put together. That’s the point. So the effect of China’s new tariffs on the U.S. are yet another rounding error. Even if China banned all imports from the U.S., that would amount to only 0.6% of our gross domestic product. And we’d sell the stuff somewhere else.
Don’t buy the hysteria. President Trump is simply trying to pressure our biggest competitor to buy more American goods. That should be a good thing, even if you don’t like him.
Story cited here.
