Finance News Opinons

The Media is Lying To You About Trump’s China Tariffs

Are you kidding me?

I’m used to partisan, inaccurate drivel from all sides these days, but the media’s coverage of President Trump’s tariffs and the so-called “trade war” takes some kind of cake.

There’s no serious doubt that some in the media would absolutely love to tank the stock market. They figure that would hurt Trump’s re-election chances in 2020. Monday’s stock market slump, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) tumble 2.4% and the Nasdaq Composite 3.4%, looked just like what the doctor ordered.


I write this, incidentally, as someone who is no fan of the president. But I remember when politics was supposed to stop at the water’s edge.

And, anyway, facts are facts. Most of what the public is being told about these tariffs is either misleading or a downright lie.

I’ve been following the coverage all weekend with my jaw on the floor.

Uncle Sam benefits


ABC Signs Jimmy Kimmel to a New Deal Months After Affiliate Revolt
Watch: David Spade Roasts Mall That Refused to Say ‘Christmas,’ Calls Out Rampant Christian Persecution
European talks reshape Ukraine’s peace plan as Zelenskyy refuses territorial concessions
Trump’s approval climbs as Republicans rally behind president’s affordability agenda: poll
Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer
New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers
DOJ fights major obstacle to bring new case against Comey
Gene Simmons says musician royalty act is about protecting the next Elvis Presley
Vermont school district flies Somali flag amid massive fraud investigation in divisive move: GOP chair
Lawsuit: Man Died After Royal Caribbean Served Him Dozens of Alcoholic Beverages and Sedated Him
Trump Cranks Up the Pressure on Defiant Zelenskyy, Says He Must ‘Start Accepting Things’
Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’
GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands
Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts
Watch: Dem. Rep. Spins Out After Learning Trump Has Officially Restored Biden’s HHS Sec. ‘Rachel’ Levine’s Name to Richard at HHS HQ

See also  Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts

Yes, tariffs are “costs.” But they do not somehow destroy our money. They do not take our hard-earned dollars and burn them in a big pile. Tariffs are simply federal taxes. That’s it. The extra costs paid by importers, and consumers, goes to Uncle Sam, to distribute as he sees fit, including, for example, on Obamacare subsidies.

It wasn’t long ago the media was complaining because Trump was cutting taxes. Now it’s complaining he’s raising them. Confused? Me too.

And the amounts involved are trivial. Chicken feed.

President Trump just hiked tariffs from 10% to 25% on about $200 billion in Chinese imports. In other words, he just raised taxes by … $30 billion a year.

Oh, no!

The total amount we all paid in taxes last year — federal, state and local — was $5.51 trillion. This tax increase that has everyone’s panties in a twist is a rounding error.

Investors panic needlessly


ABC Signs Jimmy Kimmel to a New Deal Months After Affiliate Revolt
Watch: David Spade Roasts Mall That Refused to Say ‘Christmas,’ Calls Out Rampant Christian Persecution
European talks reshape Ukraine’s peace plan as Zelenskyy refuses territorial concessions
Trump’s approval climbs as Republicans rally behind president’s affordability agenda: poll
Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer
New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers
DOJ fights major obstacle to bring new case against Comey
Gene Simmons says musician royalty act is about protecting the next Elvis Presley
Vermont school district flies Somali flag amid massive fraud investigation in divisive move: GOP chair
Lawsuit: Man Died After Royal Caribbean Served Him Dozens of Alcoholic Beverages and Sedated Him
Trump Cranks Up the Pressure on Defiant Zelenskyy, Says He Must ‘Start Accepting Things’
Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’
GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands
Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts
Watch: Dem. Rep. Spins Out After Learning Trump Has Officially Restored Biden’s HHS Sec. ‘Rachel’ Levine’s Name to Richard at HHS HQ

See also  New dark money network could exploit campaign finance loophole banning federal contractors from spending on politics

Meanwhile, the total value wiped off U.S. stocks during Monday’s panic was about $700 billion. More than 20 years’ worth of the new tariffs.

Even if Trump slapped 25% taxes on all Chinese imports, it would come to a tax hike of … $135 billion a year. U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) last year: $20.5 trillion.

So even this supposedly scary “escalation” of this “tariff war” would, er, raise our total tax bill from 26.9% of GDP all the way to 27.5% of GDP.

Oh, and isn’t it interesting to see some people’s priorities? Apparently the most shocking part of this trivial tax hike is that it might raise the price of new Apple (AAPL) iPhones.

Last I checked, these were luxury items, right?

U.S. consumers gain

Meanwhile, the trade spat seems to be bringing down food prices. China is going to take less of our farm products. So wheat prices are down 20% since the start of the year. Soybeans are at 10-year lows.

Good for consumers, right?


ABC Signs Jimmy Kimmel to a New Deal Months After Affiliate Revolt
Watch: David Spade Roasts Mall That Refused to Say ‘Christmas,’ Calls Out Rampant Christian Persecution
European talks reshape Ukraine’s peace plan as Zelenskyy refuses territorial concessions
Trump’s approval climbs as Republicans rally behind president’s affordability agenda: poll
Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer
New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers
DOJ fights major obstacle to bring new case against Comey
Gene Simmons says musician royalty act is about protecting the next Elvis Presley
Vermont school district flies Somali flag amid massive fraud investigation in divisive move: GOP chair
Lawsuit: Man Died After Royal Caribbean Served Him Dozens of Alcoholic Beverages and Sedated Him
Trump Cranks Up the Pressure on Defiant Zelenskyy, Says He Must ‘Start Accepting Things’
Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’
GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands
Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts
Watch: Dem. Rep. Spins Out After Learning Trump Has Officially Restored Biden’s HHS Sec. ‘Rachel’ Levine’s Name to Richard at HHS HQ

See also  PhRMA started cutting them checks, then they started attacking its enemies

No, no, of course not! Silly you. This is also bad news … for farmers!

And all this ignores the much bigger picture, anyway.

The tariffs are simply a means to an end. The president is trying to get China to start buying more of our stuff. He knows the so-called Middle Kingdom, which now has the second-biggest economy in the world, responds to incentives more than to nice words. These tariffs give China an incentive to open up.

OK, so China’s first reaction is just to retaliate. Big deal. That’s just posturing.

Right now we export less to China than we do to Japan, South Korea and Singapore put together. That’s the point. So the effect of China’s new tariffs on the U.S. are yet another rounding error. Even if China banned all imports from the U.S., that would amount to only 0.6% of our gross domestic product. And we’d sell the stuff somewhere else.

Don’t buy the hysteria. President Trump is simply trying to pressure our biggest competitor to buy more American goods. That should be a good thing, even if you don’t like him.

Story cited here.

 

 

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter