Why is this Republican state acting like the Obama administration?
Republican lawmakers seem to have a better grip than their Democratic colleagues on the inherent censorship of so-called free speech zones and viewpoint-based security fees.
David French of National Review counted eight states that have passed campus free-speech bills in less than six months, most recently Texas. He has one major quibble with the new Texas law: its failure to define a phrase that dictates when students can be punished for disruptions.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, which French used to lead, added another concern: failure to specify an enforcement mechanism, whether for individuals or the state attorney general.
But those quibbles are nothing compared to the constitutional problems with a pair of Texas bills on campus sexual harassment that are on Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk.
Englishman Visits America For World Cup, Meets Trump: ‘I Now Understand The American Dream’
Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter
Congress is struggling to get its work done and a new report argues for 21st-century upgrades
Nigel Farage squirms in spotlight as British press hounds him over £5M ‘gift’ from crypto billionaire
AOC puts major tech company on notice amid looming price increases: ‘Far too big’
Massie lashes out when pressed on ex-girlfriend’s allegations of affair with GOP firebrand
Bill Clinton reveals how he feels about upcoming midterms after socialist victories
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Parents take schools to court, drag queen school board member arrested
Man dead, another critical after double stabbing at Brooklyn park as police detain person of interest: NYPD
Trump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory
Louisiana Democrats pick rural farmer to challenge GOP in uphill Senate bid
Ketanji Brown Jackson Really Worried Judges Might Actually Apply Second Amendment In Gun Cases
Judge rules Republican with same name as Sen Dan Sullivan can stay on Alaska primary ballot
Taxpayer Dollars May Have Funded Education Of CCP Assets, Report Reveals
Parents of 7-year-old who died weighing 255 pounds charged with murder in suspected neglect case
The two bills set a definition of sexual harassment that mirrors the Obama administration’sview of Title IX, and incentivize college employees to report anything that the most delicate person on campus might consider sexual harassment.
Judging the legality of speech ‘entirely on subjective listener reaction’
FIRE warned Abbott in a letter last week that “faculty and staff at Texas’s universities could be sent to prison for failing to report speech and conduct that does not even constitute sexual harassment” under the Department of Education’s proposed Title IX regulatory changes.
On Wednesday, FIRE responded to criticism from the bills’ biggest booster, the Texas Association Against Sexual Assault.
The definition bill (SB 212) literally says that “unwelcome, sex based” words constitute harassment if they are “sufficiently severe, persistent, or pervasive” to interfere with a student’s studies. What is “unwelcome”? Ask the most easily offended person on campus. (Remember the University of Oregon tried to kick out a female student for a sex joke to another female. Only FIRE’s intervention saved her.)
That three-option test in the definition also botches the Supreme Court’s 20-year-old definition of sexual harassment in an educational context, known as Davis. It must be “severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive” – all three elements – for a school to be on notice.
Englishman Visits America For World Cup, Meets Trump: ‘I Now Understand The American Dream’
Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter
Congress is struggling to get its work done and a new report argues for 21st-century upgrades
Nigel Farage squirms in spotlight as British press hounds him over £5M ‘gift’ from crypto billionaire
AOC puts major tech company on notice amid looming price increases: ‘Far too big’
Massie lashes out when pressed on ex-girlfriend’s allegations of affair with GOP firebrand
Bill Clinton reveals how he feels about upcoming midterms after socialist victories
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Parents take schools to court, drag queen school board member arrested
Man dead, another critical after double stabbing at Brooklyn park as police detain person of interest: NYPD
Trump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory
Louisiana Democrats pick rural farmer to challenge GOP in uphill Senate bid
Ketanji Brown Jackson Really Worried Judges Might Actually Apply Second Amendment In Gun Cases
Judge rules Republican with same name as Sen Dan Sullivan can stay on Alaska primary ballot
Taxpayer Dollars May Have Funded Education Of CCP Assets, Report Reveals
Parents of 7-year-old who died weighing 255 pounds charged with murder in suspected neglect case
As FIRE tells the sexual-assault activists, they don’t even have to agree with its interpretation of the Davis standard to recognize the bill’s fundamental problem:
This definition is missing any kind of objective, reasonable person standard, instead conditioning the permissibility of speech (and the requirement to report) entirely on subjective listener reaction. Any definition of sexual harassment that lacks an objective component is unconstitutional.
Don’t take FIRE’s word for it. There is a long list of decisions where courts have found policies unconstitutional because they lacked an objective offensiveness component.
Can you imagine a subject more likely to cause offense than sexuality and gender? That’s FIRE’s question for the activists. “Without an objective requirement, students and faculty are held hostage to the personal feelings and opinions of their accusers, no matter how unusual or even unreasonable.”
Get ready for a flood of ‘unmeritorious’ complaints to the Title IX office
SB 212 is even worse because it includes the threat of firing and criminal penalties when employees fail to report “any and all expression that could conceivably satisfy” the bill’s uselessly broad definition of sexual harassment, FIRE wrote last week:
This in turn will flood institutional Title IX offices with unmeritorious complaints, including instances of speech plainly protected by the First Amendment or institutional promises of freedom of expression. Sifting through this avalanche will squander institutional resources that could be far better devoted to pursuing serious complaints intentionally brought to the attention of Title IX officers.
Englishman Visits America For World Cup, Meets Trump: ‘I Now Understand The American Dream’
Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter
Congress is struggling to get its work done and a new report argues for 21st-century upgrades
Nigel Farage squirms in spotlight as British press hounds him over £5M ‘gift’ from crypto billionaire
AOC puts major tech company on notice amid looming price increases: ‘Far too big’
Massie lashes out when pressed on ex-girlfriend’s allegations of affair with GOP firebrand
Bill Clinton reveals how he feels about upcoming midterms after socialist victories
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Parents take schools to court, drag queen school board member arrested
Man dead, another critical after double stabbing at Brooklyn park as police detain person of interest: NYPD
Trump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory
Louisiana Democrats pick rural farmer to challenge GOP in uphill Senate bid
Ketanji Brown Jackson Really Worried Judges Might Actually Apply Second Amendment In Gun Cases
Judge rules Republican with same name as Sen Dan Sullivan can stay on Alaska primary ballot
Taxpayer Dollars May Have Funded Education Of CCP Assets, Report Reveals
Parents of 7-year-old who died weighing 255 pounds charged with murder in suspected neglect case
And the sexual-assault activists are wrong: The bill literally makes failure to report a Class B misdemeanor, which can earn up to six months in jail.
The second bill (HB 1735) also puts Texas in the awkward position of mirroring a Democratic White House whose actions it frequently went to court to block.
It has the same unconstitutional definition of sexual harassment, but it treats accused students in sexual misconduct proceedings as if they are guilty from the start, denying them fundamental due process. Several courts, including in Texas, have told colleges they must allow cross-examination and live hearings.
FIRE’s letter to Abbott even notes that the bill incentivizes false reporting: It requires colleges to let accusers drop the courses they share with accused students “without academic penalty.” If you’re struggling in class after the traditional “drop period,” you may be tempted to claim that a classmate sexually victimized you in order to get out unscathed academically.
It would be a shame if Gov. Abbott ruined the goodwill he received from protecting free speech on campus by, well, outlawing free speech on campus. Because that’s what these two bills would do.
Story cited here.
