News Opinons Politics

Susan Collins Leans in Favor of Impeachment Trial Witnesses

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) announced Thursday evening that she will support a motion to allow additional witnesses to be heard in the Senate’s impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

“I believe hearing from certain witnesses would give each side the opportunity to more fully and fairly make their case, resolve any ambiguities, and provide additional clarity. Therefore, I will vote in support of the motion to allow witnesses and documents to be subpoenaed,” Collins, who faces a tough re-election battle, said in a statement.


‘Bond villain’: Newsom roasted as photo of him posing with ‘sugar daddy’ Alex Soros goes viral
Watch: House Democrat Makes Spectacularly Hypocritical Argument Against Holding the Clintons in Contempt of Congress
Here Are the 9 Dems Who Voted to Hold Clintons in Contempt – 2 Are Jaw-Droppers Few People Ever Saw Coming
Former special counsel Jack Smith to testify publicly over Trump investigations
Trump and world leaders sign Gaza Board of Peace charter
A rare filing in the Lisa Cook–Trump case could sway Supreme Court justices
Congress strikes rare agreement on Chinese espionage threats to US drivers
US immigration authorities allow suspect in $100M jewelry heist to self-deport before trial
Judge rules NYC’s lone Republican congressional district unconstitutional, orders redraw
Rahm Emanuel calls for mandatory retirement age of 75 for people in public office
Teen mass killer pleads guilty to NC rampage that left five dead, including brother, police officer
Barron Trump Saved a Woman’s Life as She Was Being Beaten by Her Boyfriend in UK, Reported Victim Says
Organizer of GoFundMe for ‘agitating the Nazis’ involved in anti-ICE uprising at Minneapolis church
Jury reaches verdict in trial of ex-Uvalde school police officer accused of failing to confront gunman
BREAKING: Brace for Riots – Cuban Illegal / Child Molester’s Death in ICE Custody Ruled Homicide, Despite Fact That Testimony Came from Other Detainees


“If this motion passes, I believe that the most sensible way to proceed would be for the House Managers and the President’s attorneys to attempt to agree on a limited and equal number of witnesses for each side. If they can’t agree, then the Senate could choose the number of witnesses,” the senator added.

See also  Noem and Lewandowski waged campaign to oust Trump’s border leader: Sources

Collins’ announcement came moments before the lengthy statement of fellow moderate Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who announced that he will join the overwhelming majority of his colleagues to vote against calling additional witnesses.

“I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense,” the retiring Tennessee Republican said.


‘Bond villain’: Newsom roasted as photo of him posing with ‘sugar daddy’ Alex Soros goes viral
Watch: House Democrat Makes Spectacularly Hypocritical Argument Against Holding the Clintons in Contempt of Congress
Here Are the 9 Dems Who Voted to Hold Clintons in Contempt – 2 Are Jaw-Droppers Few People Ever Saw Coming
Former special counsel Jack Smith to testify publicly over Trump investigations
Trump and world leaders sign Gaza Board of Peace charter
A rare filing in the Lisa Cook–Trump case could sway Supreme Court justices
Congress strikes rare agreement on Chinese espionage threats to US drivers
US immigration authorities allow suspect in $100M jewelry heist to self-deport before trial
Judge rules NYC’s lone Republican congressional district unconstitutional, orders redraw
Rahm Emanuel calls for mandatory retirement age of 75 for people in public office
Teen mass killer pleads guilty to NC rampage that left five dead, including brother, police officer
Barron Trump Saved a Woman’s Life as She Was Being Beaten by Her Boyfriend in UK, Reported Victim Says
Organizer of GoFundMe for ‘agitating the Nazis’ involved in anti-ICE uprising at Minneapolis church
Jury reaches verdict in trial of ex-Uvalde school police officer accused of failing to confront gunman
BREAKING: Brace for Riots – Cuban Illegal / Child Molester’s Death in ICE Custody Ruled Homicide, Despite Fact That Testimony Came from Other Detainees

See also  Organizer of GoFundMe for ‘agitating the Nazis’ involved in anti-ICE uprising at Minneapolis church

“There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence,’ he added. “There is no need to consider further the frivolous second article of impeachment that would remove the president for asserting his constitutional prerogative to protect confidential conversations with his close advisers.”

Alexander’s decision indicates that the Senate will likely fail to meet the 51-vote threshold needed to subpoena more witnesses on Friday’s blanket up-or-down vote, signaling that the trial could draw to a close in the coming days.

Speaking to reporters earlier Thursday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said that he is “increasingly optimistic” that Republicans “will move to a final verdict” before Tuesday and the president’s acquittal will be “in a bipartisan manner.”

“I’m increasingly optimistic that Republicans will move to a final verdict before Tuesday. The president will be acquitted in a bipartisan manner,” Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said. We’re not blocking anybody’s witnesses. We’re just not going to legitimize the House choosing not to call a witness, dump it in our lap, and put us in a spot where if you call the witness, you’d be bailing the courts out of judicial review of impeachment.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

See also  What will Trump’s Greenland obsession mean for the future of NATO?