Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) announced Thursday evening that she will support a motion to allow additional witnesses to be heard in the Senate’s impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.
“I believe hearing from certain witnesses would give each side the opportunity to more fully and fairly make their case, resolve any ambiguities, and provide additional clarity. Therefore, I will vote in support of the motion to allow witnesses and documents to be subpoenaed,” Collins, who faces a tough re-election battle, said in a statement.
I will vote in support of the motion to allow witnesses and documents to be subpoenaed. My full statement: https://t.co/VuhZv6CO5e pic.twitter.com/LhQlnvPaoc
— Sen. Susan Collins (@SenatorCollins) January 31, 2020
“If this motion passes, I believe that the most sensible way to proceed would be for the House Managers and the President’s attorneys to attempt to agree on a limited and equal number of witnesses for each side. If they can’t agree, then the Senate could choose the number of witnesses,” the senator added.
Collins’ announcement came moments before the lengthy statement of fellow moderate Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who announced that he will join the overwhelming majority of his colleagues to vote against calling additional witnesses.
“I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense,” the retiring Tennessee Republican said.
Biden admin will move to reclassify marijuana as ‘less dangerous drug’ in historic shift: AP GOP lawmakers say MTG’s push to oust Johnson falling flat among voters Police at UNC Chapel Hill detain at least 30 anti-Israel protesters, crowds try to force into buildings We Share the Gospel with Everyone, Because ‘No Case Is Hopeless While Jesus Lives’ House Democrats Furious That Mike Johnson Is Forcing Them to Reveal Their True Colors with Anti-Semitism Vote GOP lawmakers hit with ‘gut punch’ as red state’s Dem governor ekes out win in transgender bill battle White House condemns antisemitism, violent anti-Israel anarchy at Columbia University: ‘No place in America’ MLB to Change Uniforms After Weeks of Uproar: ‘This Has Been Entirely a Nike Issue’ Watch: LeBron Coldly Answers ‘No’ on Whether He’s Confident in His Team After Season-Ending Loss Conservative groups wary of bipartisan House push for college antisemitism monitors Mississippi lawmakers poised to vote on Medicaid expansion plan with work mandate Columbia University facilities worker speaks out after terror takeover: ‘They held me hostage’ Watch: Nancy Pelosi Snaps at MSNBC Host, Calls Her a Trump ‘Apologist’ After Host Reminds Her of Crucial Detail Senate gridlock could worsen with Romney, Sinema, Manchin retirements: experts NY v Trump criminal trial begins its 3rd week as former president accused of gag order violations
“There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence,’ he added. “There is no need to consider further the frivolous second article of impeachment that would remove the president for asserting his constitutional prerogative to protect confidential conversations with his close advisers.”
Alexander’s decision indicates that the Senate will likely fail to meet the 51-vote threshold needed to subpoena more witnesses on Friday’s blanket up-or-down vote, signaling that the trial could draw to a close in the coming days.
Speaking to reporters earlier Thursday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said that he is “increasingly optimistic” that Republicans “will move to a final verdict” before Tuesday and the president’s acquittal will be “in a bipartisan manner.”
“I’m increasingly optimistic that Republicans will move to a final verdict before Tuesday. The president will be acquitted in a bipartisan manner,” Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said. We’re not blocking anybody’s witnesses. We’re just not going to legitimize the House choosing not to call a witness, dump it in our lap, and put us in a spot where if you call the witness, you’d be bailing the courts out of judicial review of impeachment.”
Story cited here.