The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Pentagon stopping gender transition treatment for transgender troops
Trump targets massive investments in first Middle East trip
Trump endorses Jack Ciattarelli for New Jersey governor: ‘A winner’
Trump backs Jack Ciattarelli in coveted New Jersey governor race
Fatal fall in Washington’s North Cascades kills 3, leaves 1 survivor
Florida State University alleged mass shooter appears in mugshot with disfigured face after hospital release
Far-left mayor arrested at ICE facility denies impeding law enforcement, says protest ‘absolutely’ effective
Tycoon Couple Arrested After Massive Federal Raid, Accused of Working with Cartels
Pro-Israel Americans urge Trump to ‘tread lightly’ with Qatar
Trump officials celebrate white South Africans’ arrival in DC
Major Underwater Volcano Off US Coast Is Showing Signs of Impending Eruption, Scientists Say
Fetterman Showing ‘Warning Signs,’ Dems Might Step In: Explosive Reports
Newsom calls on California cities to ban homeless encampments
Organizers Cancel Former ‘The Voice’ Contestant’s Concerts Because She Attended a Pro-Life Event
Harvard president claims ‘unfounded retaliation’ amid Trump funding feud
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
