The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Liberal city’s ‘disgraceful’ move before baseball’s opening day has activists furious
Leftwing groups attempting to block congressional oversight of Biden may violate law, conservative org warns
LA DA George Gascon challenged by Jonathan Hatami, prosecutor of child killers
President Biden to visit Mississippi after tornadoes ravage state, leaving 25 dead
Biden ‘strongly opposes’ resolution ending COVID-19 national emergency, but won’t veto it after Senate vote
Illegal Alien Arrested After What He Allegedly Did to Minor Girl in Walmart Parking Lot
Four Words Turn Hillary Clinton’s Gun Control Rant on Its Head and Make Her Look Like a Fool
Ohio lawmaker moves to force vote on constitutional amendment rules
Minneapolis City Council to discuss potential settlement in major Floyd lawsuit
Tucker Carlson Knocks the Socks Off His Competition with Ratings, But What ‘The Five’ Did Is Truly Amazing
Fans Ecstatic Over Who Made an Appearance on ‘The Five’ – ‘You Always Do a Good Job’
Huge: Rand Paul Says He Has New Information on Fauci’s Employment Despite His ‘Retirement’ Claim
Teen Carjackers Busted After Pesky Manual Transmission Thwarts Their Scheme: Police
Feds examine gas pipeline at Pennsylvania chocolate factory blast site
Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman planning to return to Senate in mid-April after depression treatment
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
Scroll down to leave a comment:
