The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
‘Christian’ University Under Fire Over Grant to ‘Foster Inclusion’ of ‘LGBTQIA+ Individuals and Women’ in the Church
WaPo Defends Alleged Hounding of Intel Officials: Tulsi’s ODNI Strikes Back with Cutting 3-Word Response
Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels speculation about China’s global standing
Trump on a roll, back-to-back victory weeks: White House Report Card
North Carolina governor vetoes Republican-led anti DEI and trans legislation
Parents desperately seeking answers on missing campers after Texas flood
Republicans praise ‘big, beautiful bill’s’ work requirement for Medicaid: ‘We’ve got to get back to work’
Revolting: Pop Star Laughs and Sings About Murdering ‘4 or 5’ of Her Own Children Via Abortion
Past Comments Come Back to Bite Hakeem Jeffries After Record-Setting ‘Filibuster’
One dead after fireworks explosion sets Los Angeles home on fire
Trump White House calls out Smithsonian for pushing ‘one-sided, divisive political narratives’
Deadly social media trend threatens kids, homeowners defending themselves: ‘children are going to get killed’
Where the ceasefire negotiations stand ahead of Trump-Netanyahu meeting
NYC temporarily shuts down Queens beaches after sharks swim dangerously close to Fourth of July crowd
Human remains discovered days after devastating California fireworks facility explosion
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
