The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
President Trump Explains Importance of Memorial Day in Rousing Speech: ‘The Ultimate Sacrifice’
Dem City Gave Muslim Group $35k and Didn’t Track How It Was Spent
Anti-ICE protesters clash with agents outside New Jersey detention center as Gov Sherrill denied entry
Trump calls on Arab nations to sign Abraham Accords
New Jersey governor, Democratic senator spend Memorial Day protesting ICE facility
Sex Trafficking: More Disastrous Graham Platner Comments Surface as Dem Buyers Regret Reaches New High
Hollywood Ignored the ‘Project Hail Mary’ Blueprint as ‘Star Wars’ Stumbles and Nolan’s ‘Odyssey’ Looks Headed for Trouble
Tim Walz’ Gun-Control Bill Goes Down In Flames Despite Dems’ Sit-In Protest
Rubio pushes back on India’s concerns over US visa curbs, says policy must be ‘America First’ under Trump
Parents Revolt After College Tries Surveillance Experiment On Kids, Report Shows
Vets torch Dem Senate hopeful who called Army ‘fat, lazy trash,’ mocked soldier shot four times
Omar confronted on camera over GOP proposal targeting foreign-born lawmakers: ‘Good luck to her’
UFO insider claims US has bodies of 4 different alien species from downed spacecraft in government custody
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Marine vet prosecutor refuses to cross constitutional line on Spanberger ‘assault weapon’ ban
GOP senators spurn anti-weaponization fund payout for phone data seizure: ‘I don’t need any compensation’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
