The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
House GOP leader blasts trans athletes in girls’ sports as ‘biggest form of bullying’
Ex-state education official launches bid for Wyoming’s lone US House seat
Musk to Seek Full Custody After His Child’s Mother, a Former Conservative Influencer, Backs Gender Transition
Trump Announces His First Move After ‘Locked and Loaded’ Warning Against Iran
Elizabeth Warren says Trump called her after speech criticizing his record on costs
Riley Gaines to interview alleged victim in West Virginia v. B.P.J.
Trump dealt GOP blows over Powell inquiry amid rising tensions with Congress
Bill Clinton scheduled to appear before Oversight Committee as contempt of Congress threat looms
New York City unions have history of supporting Maduro regime
Mississippi man accused of killing six in shooting spree pleads not guilty
Rep Ro Khanna demands prosecution of ICE agent in Minneapolis fatal shooting
Jack Smith to testify next week at a public House Judiciary Committee hearing
Nonprofit revenue totals surge amid growing scrutiny after major fraud cases
Trump imposes 25% tariff on any country doing business with Iran
‘Disturbance’ at Georgia Prison Leaves 3 Inmates Dead, a Dozen More Injured
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
