The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Michigan GOP gubernatorial candidate John James skips Vance rally, citing debate prep
Hollywood Mega Producer Admits to Joe Rogan That Once Societies Abandon God, They Turn To Tyranny
Active shooter report at Oregon elementary school draws large police response
‘One of a Kind’ Pastor Serving in Trump Administration Dies at Age 47
Ilhan Omar’s husband snaps over rumors she fled US after federal immigration fraud raid
Horse farm owner gets life in prison for boyfriend’s murder after claiming self-defense
Fort Hood survivors praise Trump for scrapping Hasan execution livestream: ‘We’re not barbaric’
British defense secretary to ask Hegseth about Starshield outage as UK tries to ‘bridge’ US and Ukraine ‘back together’
Trump links Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed to Muslim Brotherhood: ‘He’s a con man’
America’s next war could reach US soil, top Army general warns
WH Investigating Ex-Kennedy Center Head Over Reportedly Missing $5.6 Million Donation – Had Previously Fired Western Journal Founder Over His Faith
DOJ case attacks mass murder fandom culture behind Canadian school shooting
Bill and Hillary Clinton make eleventh-hour midterm moves as party’s old guard faces new reality
Somalis in Minnesota unleash fury on Trump after feds raid Ilhan Omar’s DC home
MS NOW Reporter Offers Hilarious Apology After Fake Reporting: Kash Patel ‘Did Not, in Fact, Land in Russia’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
