The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Obama Operative Turned Trump Voter Exposes the Anti-Working-Class Bigotry That Destroyed the Democrats
Fox News Stars Mourn the Brutal Murder of a Beloved ‘Fan Who Became a Friend’
EXCLUSIVE: Pence group knocks Vance plan to pay stay-at-home parents up to $9K per child
Clinton, Bush received multiple warnings on bin Laden hijack plots before 9/11, declassified files show
Nashville Airport Authority Votes Unanimously to Change Name to Honor Dolly Parton
Watch: Convention Crowd Symbolically Anoints JD Vance for 2028 with Chant
Inside Trump’s intimate meeting with nation’s bravest soldiers during whirlwind Texas trip
California woman chased, fatally shot by illegal immigrant DoorDash driver who stalked her for months: DHS
AOC, Mamdani interaction caught on cam at 9/11 memorial sparks online fury
Breaking: Newly Declassified 9/11 Documents Reveal the Repeated Warnings Received by Clinton and Bush
The ‘Jumper’ Victims of 9/11 Deserve to Have Their Stories Heard: And Yet They’ve Been Erased by the Media
Attacks of 9/11 sent Rep. Eli Crane into the military and shaped the way he views the Iran war
Texas man remembered by Fox News hosts after repeat offender arrested in savage park bench slaying
Reporter’s Notebook: Countdown is on as Senate races to pass crypto, college sports bills
Court documents show groups inspiring ‘satanist’ teenager’s alleged plans to attack Christians
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
