The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Bodycam shows Charlotte train murder suspect’s interaction with police months before Iryna Zarutska stabbing
Louisiana death row inmate freed after nearly 30 years as overturned conviction upends case
Alleged National Guard shooter worked with US government entities in Afghanistan, including CIA: Ratcliffe
Alleged DC shooter entered US under Afghan resettlement push Mayorkas vowed would be done ‘swiftly and safely’
Trump pins DC National Guard shooting on Biden’s post-Afghanistan immigration policy
Afghan National Guard Shooter Entered US Under Biden Immigration Program in 2021 During Afghan Withdrawal: Report
LAX travelers abandon cars, walk to airport as protesters block building during Thanksgiving rush
Suspected gunman in DC National Guard shooting identified as Afghan national
Breaking: National Guard Shooter Is Afghan National, Potential Terrorist – FBI
FAA investigating Amazon after drone cuts internet cable
Update: National Guard Troops Shot in DC Were Ambushed, Shot at Point-Blank Range
‘We Will Never Back Down’: Trump, Hegseth Refuse to Yield After National Guardsmen Shot, Sending 500 More Troops to DC
Bipartisan support, outrage pour in after ‘targeted’ DC shooting of National Guardsmen: ‘Horrific’
‘You Are Beyond Sick’: MS NOW Journalist Suggests ICE Arrests to Blame for National Guard Shootings
Fox News Politics Newsletter: US envoy gave Russian aide tips on selling Ukraine deal
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
