The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump Deports Iraqi Man to Africa, Reportedly Plans to Send More Migrants There
Cardinal Demands Vote for New Pope Despite 5 Year Prison Sentence After Unheard of Vatican Trial
Federal Judge in West Texas Stops Immigrant Deportations Under Alien Enemies Act
Trump blasts Putin, questioning if Russian leader wants peace or is just ‘tapping me along’
Trump Levels Crockett: ‘Demeaning to Our Country’
‘No excuse’: Bipartisan fury erupts over New Jersey’s REAL ID backlog
Illegal Alien Arrested After Game of Hide-and-Seek Allegedly Takes a Heinous Turn
Tom Homan Speaks After Arrest of Judges: ‘Nobody Should Be Surprised … These Actions Are Felonies’
Trump and Biden sit rows apart, president meets with Zelensky: Pope Francis funeral takeaways
Experts reveal Trump’s next move could be ‘nail in coffin’ for Biden-era regulations on nicotine
China Orders Airlines Not to Take Deliveries of Boeing Planes
Fox News Digital’s Presidential 100 Days Quiz
Alex Soros in hot seat after left-wing outlet exposes what his dad’s network thinks of his online footprint
Here’s what happened during Trump’s 14th week in office
MSNBC Staffers Realize Something About Rachel Maddow’s New Boss: ‘He Could Have a MAGA Hat at Home’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
