The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
DOJ Reveals ‘Damning’ Evidence Against Letitia James in New Court Filing
Alert: Bill and Hillary Clinton Ordered to Comply with House Oversight Subpoenas, Contempt Charges Already Being Threatened
Mike Johnson says House GOP working full steam ahead on Trump’s ‘affordability agenda’
Trump says those against tariffs ‘serving hostile foreign interests,’ ‘full benefit’ yet to be seen
Masked thieves in South American crime ring loot American homes in coordinated pattern, police warn
Chicago public schools blow millions on travel while students can’t read at grade level and more top headlines
Christianity Today Hires Woke Female CEO Amid Continued Liberal Shift
Where illegal immigrants find work in the US
Nikki Haley’s Gen Z Son Gains Online Following, Charts Different Course from Mother
Trump kicks off Thanksgiving week with turkey pardon and Christmas tree arrival
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene slaps down notion that she’s eyeing a presidential run
FAA scrambles to hire 8,900 air traffic controllers by 2028 as shortage reaches crisis levels
Top military leaders head to Puerto Rico to thank troops supporting Caribbean missions
Rubio claims ‘tremendous amount of progress’ in Ukraine peace talks following Geneva meeting
Kristi Noem unveils $1B TSA modernization plan, awards $10K bonuses to workers who served during shutdown
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
