The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump admin sues Penn State over in-state tuition policy for undocumented migrants
Colorado police officer killed, 3 more officers wounded after suspect opens fire near bus
Trump’s massive Arlington triumphal arch approved for construction by federal planning commission
Indiana, Florida and Alabama carry out rare US triple execution day
Watch: DeSantis Nails Midterm Blowout with Blunt Talk on Thune’s GOP Senate – ‘They Didn’t Even Attempt’ Bold Conservatism
Military Identifies Remains of WWII Soldier Who Served in Legendary Merrill’s Marauders
Big Blue Wave Gives Democrats the Power to Effectively End the Electoral College Before 2028
Vance ‘privately’ blasts Netanyahu as Iran war divides Trump administration and 2028 ambitions loom
Child molester’s looming prison release reignites sanctuary showdown in wake of Dem election sweep
DOJ Launches Criminal Investigation Into Leak of Supreme Court Decision That Overturned Roe v. Wade
Preview of What’s to Come: As Iowa Falls to Dems, Obama Judge Clears Way for Satanists to Take Over Statehouse
California’s Sky-High Minimum Wage Claims Another Victim as Major Outback Steakhouse Franchisee Is Forced to File for Bankruptcy
Trump signs proclamation to prevent changes to Oval Office, other White House rooms
Texas State Rep Calls for Emergency Session Put Guardrails on Executive Branch Before Dems Seize Power
Eight GOP Reps. Who Co-Sponsored Amnesty Bill Voted Out of Office
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
