The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Platner’s replacement faces new Senate campaign headache tied to his son’s lobbying
Should Trump build a White House ballroom? Americans weigh in
Red Sox Announcer Issues Apology After Calling for On-Field Violence Against Yankees Star During Game
NJ mom fatally stabbed in Times Square during first week back at Bank of America after maternity leave
Times Square Stabber Is Eerily Similar to Leftist Heroes Lindsay Clancy and Luigi Mangione – Postpartum Depression, Dead Corporate Exec
White House highlights ‘steepest’ ever decline in US casualties from cartels amid boat strikes
Dem megadonor among 400 Jewish Michiganders labeled AIPAC insiders for denouncing El-Sayed’s leftist campaign
Judge raises stakes with pivotal ruling in Charlie Kirk assassination case and more top headlines
Nation’s largest teachers union under fire as controversial agenda puts century-old federal charter at risk
DeSantis endorses Florida GOP slate including Byron Donalds in governor’s race
Associated Press Dismisses Government Report on Thousands of Illegals Voting in 2020 – Again
Ohio Supreme Court denies Mackenzie Shirilla’s latest appeal bid in double murder case
Haitian college student in Ohio dies by apparent suicide after losing TPS status, family says
Hasan Piker cheerleads progressives as 80-year-old senator wins six more years
Progressive push hits wall against conservative Democrat in deep-blue district
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
