The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Iowa congressman took cash from Chinese companies buying American farmland
Dem rep identifies himself as one of this year’s State of the Union designated survivors
Evil: Newsom’s Team Decides to Free Child Molester Whose Crimes We Can’t Fully Describe Here (and You Wouldn’t Want Us To)
Pure Gold: GOP Gov. of Mississippi Offers to Send Reading Teachers to Coach Gavin Newsom Since Black Students in MS Are 2.5x Better Readers Than in CA
Growing number of Democrats skipping Trump’s 2026 State of the Union
Savannah Guthrie offers $1 million family reward for recovery of Nancy Guthrie
France restricts Trump ambassador’s access to officials after missed summons
Idaho woman accused of attempting to set fire to DHS building with stolen ambulance
Alert: Massive Development Reported in DOJ’s Sedition Case Against Mark Kelly, Others – Bad News for Trump Admin
Speechwriters from Reagan to Biden agree: Trump’s SOTU is a critical test for his second term
California GOP infighting could destroy any chance at governorship
Trump to come face-to-face with Supreme Court justices who rejected tariffs at State of the Union
Prosecutors: Utah Mom Who Wrote Children’s Book About Grief After Husband Died Actually Killed Him
FBI records contradict claims Biden was ‘not aware’ of Mar-a-Lago raid
Conservative super PAC drops six-figure ad buy in major move to defend Trump’s trifecta
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
