The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump-Meloni spat grows over claim Italian PM ‘begged’ for photo: ‘astonished’
SEE IT: Dem senator downplays security threat of illegal immigration after White House terror plot
Gilgo Beach serial killer’s ex-wife says he ‘got what he deserved’ after he gets max sentence for 8 murders
Breaking: US Brokers Lebanon Ceasefire After Escalation Derails Peace Talks with Iran
UK’s Prime Minister Directed 13,000 Suspected Pedophiles Get Warning Letters Instead of Prosecution, According to Rape Gang Report
Republican congressman will end months-long absence from DC after missing 135 roll call votes
WATCH: Tom Hanks Painful Insult to MSNOW Interviewer Goes Viral During Obama Presidential Center Opening
Trump’s 80th Birthday Goes Off Without a Hitch, as UFC Bring Manliness, Spirit of Teddy Roosevelt Back to WH Lawn
Disgraced Murdaugh trial clerk who helped blow up murder conviction claims protection from payback lawsuit
Dem justices slap Soros-backed Philly DA with power strip in stunning decision: ‘Not reliable’
PHOTOS: Best moments from Obama’s presidential center opening
Will Dems’ targeting of California GOP-turned-Indie congressman ‘Pan’ out?
UN’s Albanese faces uphill battle with First Amendment case seeking to end sanctions against her
Interest rate cut not likely on the table, even after Iran deal and somewhat falling oil prices
US military kills three ‘narco-terrorists’ in latest lethal strike on vessel in the Eastern Pacific
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
