The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
US is ‘steadily destroying’ Iran’s ‘most essential’ war tools: Report
Iranian women’s soccer team captain becomes latest member to withdraw asylum bid
Former substitute teacher and boyfriend face 38 child sex charges as bond nears 9 million
Arizona man who admitted to crucifying pastor asks for death penalty so ‘we can move on with our lives’
TSA Accuses Democrats and Their Shutdown for Absurdly Long Security Lines
Woman Arrested for Allegedly Stealing Gun to Kill Trump
Panama Canal Braces for Rise in Traffic Amid Iran War
More Americans Make This Money Move in Possible Sign of Economic Woes
String of attacks connected to naturalized citizens raises national security questions
Soros Prosecutor Blames Republicans After Convicted ISIS Supporter Opens Fire At Old Dominion University
Top California librarian questioned about missing $650K tied to Dolly Parton child literacy program
Latino voters are ‘no longer sleeping,’ Univision president warns GOP, Dems
It Took CNN Analyst Only 15 Minutes to Suggest Trump Incited Michigan Synagogue Attack
Hero ROTC Cadet Stabbed ISIS-Inspired Shooter To Death, Saving Lives
Airline CEOs torch lawmakers for turning air travel into a ‘political football’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
