The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Inside the ‘digital lockdown’ for US officials as Trump arrives in China
Move to oust Nancy Guthrie sheriff fails as Pima County supervisors refer perjury allegations to AG
Marco Rubio spotted in Nike tracksuit aboard Air Force One during trip to China, igniting memes online
Rubio wears Nike tracksuit aboard Air Force One in parody of Maduro capture
High school student with history of anger issues charged with murder of homeless woman in Las Vegas
Nebraska’s Pillen wins Republican renomination in bid for second term as governor
Lawsuit: ChatGPT Told Florida State Shooter that Killing Children Would Get Him ‘More Attention’ Than Targeting Adults
House GOP launches new task force, probes alleged Medicaid fraud in Ohio
Republican Ricketts wins GOP primary in Nebraska, advances to key Senate showdown
Poll: Rubio Opens Up Double-Digit Lead on Vance, AOC Leads 2028 Democratic Field
Big city Democrat mayor arrested at ICE protest faces voters in re-election bid
BREAKING: All Tenn. Dem Reps Have Been Removed from Every House Committee Possible as Punishment for Redistricting Chaos
Fake Black Woman Rachel Dolezal Resurfaces After Decade, Has Entered Digital Version of World’s Oldest Profession
Gay Couple Who Acquired 5 Boys Arrested on Child Sex Charges
Judge keeps block on Trump administration effort to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Liberia
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
