The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
GSA finds China-made tech labeled ‘Made in USA’ in federal procurement program, orders sweeping review
Darline Graham Nordone nabs Senate runoff endorsement from ex-primary rival Russell Fry
Danish PM calls migrants with ‘Islamic background’ the greatest threat as Europe braces for second migrant wave
‘Raw material for election fraud’: Expert flags voter-roll problems far beyond one state
Breaking: Luigi Mangione Confesses to Assassinating Health Care CEO, Pleads Guilty to Murder
Female Suspect in WWII Memorial Defacement Arrested, Jeanine Pirro Announces Felony Charges
Cuban ties put powerful US union under microscope over alleged communist influence push
This 2002 Sports Comedy Predicted the WNBA’s Trans Predicament, But Real Life is Even Funnier: Spoilers
WWII Memorial vandalism suspect now in custody, to be charged with two felonies, Pirro announces
WNBA Suddenly Needs Time to Evaluate Men Competing, But the League Wasn’t Confused in This Resurfaced Post
American missionary Kevin Rideout released after more than 9 months in captivity in Niger
Deadly Connecticut home invasion suspect texted ‘I’ll make her life hell’ before attack: report
‘House’ Star Hugh Laurie Blasted by Left After Standing with Sophie Cunningham and Her Fight to Keep Men Out of Women’s Sports
No Death Penalty: Tyler Robinson’s Attorneys Launch Plan to Keep Charlie Kirk’s Accused Murderer Off Death Row – and It Could Work
Nigel Farage beats Count Binface to stay as Clacton-on-Sea’s member of Parliament
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
