The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Steve Hilton launches ad mocking Xavier Becerra’s ’36 years’ as a career politician in California gov race
WATCH – Smug Dem Rep’s Face Goes Totally Blank After a Cool Sec. Bessent Educates Him About His Own Branch of Government
GRAPHIC: The Excuse This Islamist Gives for Raping 250 Women Shows Why Islam and the West Can’t Exist Together
Vance Enrages Starmer with His Condemnation of the Police Response to Henry Nowak’s Murder
Pennsylvania AG explains why state leads nation in Medicaid fraud convictions while others battle mass schemes
Veteran-founded bourbon brand wins $25,000 Fox Business contest: ‘Sip to remember’
Witnesses in Karmelo Anthony murder trial confirm Austin Metcalf’s words immediately after attack
Trump issues pardon to former Republican congressman convicted of insider trading
The Way to Save Education Is Through School Choice
Christians Are Being Hunted Like Sport
Indian Christians Face Rising Levels of Persecution as Hindu Nationalism Grows
Auburn student Weston Higginbotham found dead in Japan after weeklong search, mom confirms
Platner supporter Khanna calls Senate hopeful’s past relationships ‘toxic,’ but says he deserves ‘redemption’
Six Flags Bans Popular YouTuber ‘For Life’ After Viral Chicken McNugget Video
National Park Service ranger dies after falling into crevasse on Mount McKinley during climbing patrol
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
