The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Fierce Trump critic Jasmine Crockett shakes up high-stakes Senate race
White House turns up heat on Biden’s economic record as voters sour on ‘affordability’
Former Miss Slovakia says Uber driver kicked her out on busy intersection for being Jewish
Luigi Mangione pumps fist in court as body cam allegedly reveals loaded magazine found inside wet underwear
Top Dem Drops Out of Texas Senate Race on Same Day Jasmine Crockett Is Expected to Announce Her Candidacy
Op-Ed: Shocking Teenage Abortion Investigation Shows Weakness of Red-State Abortion Laws
Trump to unleash $12B farm rescue as China trade reset hits US growers
Trump HHS changes transgender Biden official’s nameplate back to birth name during shutdown
Megyn Kelly Confirms Deadly COVID Vax Reporting – Read the Bombshell ’10 Out of 96 Reported Child Deaths Were Vax-Related’ Memo Here
Picture Perfect Troll: Trump Adds His Birthday to List of Dates for Free Nat’l Park Admission and Cuts MLK Day, Juneteenth
SCOTUS takes up Trump’s bid to fire FTC commissioner at will — a showdown that could topple 90-year precedent
US deports more Iranians, Islamic republic says
DC police chief resigns amid Trump pressure and crime data manipulation probe
Crime rings, hackers join forces to hijack trucks nationwide, fueling major holiday shipping security fears
White House Joins Musk in Striking Back at European Union Regulation: ‘An Attack on All American Tech Platforms’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.









