The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Ax-wielding suspect subdued by teen military recruit’s MMA takedown in car wash clash caught on video
‘Unprecedented’ agreement releases emergency oil reserves as gas prices spark concerns
House Oversight Committee demands depositions from Bondi and Lutnick in Epstein probe
Dem lawmaker disputes police bodycam amid reports he said he was above the law: ‘On top’ or ‘on time’
Bipartisan housing push advances, but Trump-backed investor ban faces resistance
Trump administration puts key Biden-era immigration policy on notice: ‘Unsustainable cycle’
The ‘Worst Mayor in America’ Is Attempting a Political Comeback — With a New Party
Kamala Harris Cancels Multiple Book Tour Stops Amid Controversy
Unusual Calls Made from NYC Terror Suspect’s Home Hours After Arrest Raise Questions: Report
Uh-Oh: Video Captures Schumer Finally Admitting It – He Hates the SAVE America Act Because It Cleans Voter Rolls in Every State
Hillary Clinton caught on video stepping back after pushy former president nudges her at busy NYC intersection
Shipping disruptions spread beyond oil: Helium, sulfur, and semiconductors
3 brothers of Iraqi descent arrested in Oslo for allegedly ‘terror bombing’ of US Embassy
Republican Sen. John Cornyn Calls on GOP to Change Filibuster and Pass SAVE Act as He Prepares for Primary Runoff Against Ken Paxton
Minnesota human services officials skip fraud hearing as Walz promises reform
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
