The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
EXCLUSIVE: Inside Trump’s private schedule as media fixates on his health
Obese man on death row chooses buffet of BBQ, wings, cheeseburger, pizza, ice cream for last meal in Georgia
Florida influencer, 41, accused of inappropriately touching, exposing herself to teenage son’s friend
Republican House leader signals plan to begin contempt proceedings against Bill and Hillary Clinton
Watch: Tim Walz Tries to Make Somali Fraud Scandal Seem Perfectly Normal, Blames Trump for Talking About It
Elon Musk Sets Newsom Straight on ‘Trans Kids’ After Governor’s Office Attacks Musk’s Family
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Omar accused of opening door to massive Minneapolis fraud
Gabbard blasts Democrat Bennie Thompson for calling National Guard shooting an ‘unfortunate accident’
FDA Set to Give COVID Vaccines Serious ‘Black Box’ Designation: Report
DOJ asks appeals court to halt Boasberg’s contempt hearing next week
‘Incompetence or dereliction’: Minnesota lawmaker rips Tim Walz as state fraud losses mount
DHS sweeps Twin Cities, arrests 400 as feds blast Walz for ‘failing to protect Minnesota’
DOJ Sues Four States for Violating Federal Election Law
Indiana governor vows to primary Republicans who voted against redistricting — but it won’t be easy
Christmas brawl erupts in wealthy Massachusetts enclave during holiday celebration
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
