The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Lindsey Graham’s final mission nears finish line as world leaders gather to honor him
Democrats target more GOP House seats after socialist victories rock left-wing primaries
Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband details ‘big spiral’ as expert says one part ‘scared me’ in mom’s murder trial
Heroic 16-year-old lifeguard rescues child from monster surf in heart-stopping video
California family members claim they were attacked at luxury Maui resort during violent melee
Leaked Document Reveals How Senate Republicans Plan to Walk Tightrope on SAVE America Act
19 cadets rushed to hospitals after mystery illness strikes military-style youth academy in DC area
Biden ghostwriter tapes released after former president forfeits legal battle
Biden’s classified docs narrative crumbles amid release of ghostwriter tapes: ‘Be careful’
Trump Calls on John Thune to Hold Senators in D.C. Until They Terminate the Filibuster
Senate advances nomination of Jay Clayton to lead intel community
Georgia teenager pleads guilty to charging Capitol grounds with shotgun
Netflix Executive Takes Legal Action After Being Fired for Workplace Retreat Confession
Senate clears way for Trump’s top spy as key anti-terror program remains in limbo
Summer School: Republicans’ crusade to teach voters the ‘New Math’ on the ‘commie caucus’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
