The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Alberta Pastor Arrested for Refusing to Apologize for Hurting Woke Librarian’s Feelings
Huge DC Pipe Bomb Twist Changes the Story – The Biden Admin Knew
Trump hosts ‘Washington Accords’ Rwanda-Congo peace deal signing, vows US rare earths purchases
Young Americans give big thumbs down to Democrats, Republicans, Trump: poll
Trump ‘most important president in maybe 100 years’
US announces ‘reconsideration’ of ties with Tanzania amid ‘disturbing violence against civilians’
PhRMA started cutting them checks, then they started attacking its enemies
Samaritan’s Purse Plane Hijacked While on Aid Mission
WATCH: Dem lawmaker thanks Trump for pardon, says it came as a surprise amid re-election bid
Watch: Jake Tapper Masterfully Takes Down Dems, Critics Accusing Trump of Sleeping During Meeting
State Department announces renaming USIP ‘Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace’
PA school faces fury after Muslim club’s pro-Palestinian display leaves Jewish students ‘shaken’
Haitian gang leader learns sentence for orchestrating kidnapping of 16 American missionaries
Illinois church Nativity shows baby Jesus zip-tied by ICE agents
GOP dismisses off-year races as Democrats eye 2026 Senate takeover
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
