The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Court filings reveal Kyrsten Sinema had sex multiple times with married bodyguard while serving as senator
Justice Thomas reveals this elite institution is ‘off limits’ to him: ‘That’s the world we’re in’
‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ is a slog for the uninitiated
Military Identifies 2 Soldiers Killed in Texas Helicopter Crash Earlier This Week
Shooting Rocks University Campus as School Prepares for Classes to Resume
Companies Back Down After Red State AG’s Debanking Probe
He’s Baaaack: Platner Returns to Political Spotlight as His Replacement Deals with a Domestic Violence Allegation of His Own
Nearly One-in-Six Americans Have Acted on AI Medical Advice Without Speaking to Human, Poll Shows
Florida cold case suspect allegedly confesses to 1987 murder and reveals secret crime-scene details
Virginia State University shooting: At least 5 injured, one critically
ICYMI: Judge Shuts Down Democrats’ Attempt to Rush in Late Votes After Candidates Drop Out
Top Dem operative brushes off latest scandal plaguing Maine Senate candidate as ‘salacious gossip’
Gun rights gets ‘greatest restoration’ in 100 years with latest Trump DOJ move, lawmaker hails
DSA brand on trial as El-Sayed struggles where Dems can least afford it
Socialist in Trump country gives Karl Marx vision thumbs-up before ducking key tax question
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
