The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Denver, Boulder ignored ICE detainers for migrants with child abuse, assault arrests, House GOP report reveals
Radical anti-Trump language riddles California voter guide on high-stakes ballot measure
Kohberger prosecutors say no as Idaho killer tries to boot judge who called him a ‘faceless coward’
Op-Ed from Iranian Kurd: Handing Iraqi Kurdistan to Tehran Would Be a Big Mistake
Jim Jordan Sums Up Progressive Platform in Scathing Takedown: ‘The Left Hates 2 Countries – America and Israel’
Severe turbulence diverts New York City flight to Miami, 8 injured
Could Trump play hardball to prevent an MLB lockout?
Trump cuts $810 million in federal spending he previously approved
Kathy Hochul counts on Mamdani to rev reelection turnout despite GOP attacks
Dem Congressional Candidate Claims She Was Raped While Repairing Campaign Signs and Hid from Her Husband for Days
US Attorney calls out ‘loud-mouth’ California Dems as feds step in with Skid Row drug bust: ‘They’re lunatics’
The powerful way American communities can benefit from the new tech boom revealed by data center CEO
WNBA Suffers Immediate Downturn After Caitlin Clark Is Eliminated from Playoffs
Schumer says he’s not going anywhere, but his own candidates aren’t ready to back him
Mamdani demands Trump release illegal immigrant shot by ICE agent as protests erupt in the Bronx
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
