The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Judge hands Trump mail-ballot win for now as Democrats’ next move looms
Another One: Male LGBT Activist Arrested After Admitting Abusive Plan for 13-Year-Old Boy
1994 NBA Finals Clip Resurfaces Showing Trump at Knicks Game After Hochul Questioned His Fandom
Clarence Thomas puts Dems on clock as Alabama GOP emergency map bid stalled
Federal government’s landlord joins Vance fraud crackdown as White House widens hunt: ‘Critical force’
Al Green was a fighter for the Democrats. He lost his Texas primary anyway
Pentagon slashes NATO combat commitments as Trump pushes Europe to defend itself
US denies reports of evacuating US Embassy in Kyiv amid threats of Russian airstrikes
Ukrainian veterans are returning injured, broken, and angry. How can the government help them survive?
California teacher Samantha Watson arrested for alleged sexual conduct with student at charter school
RFK Jr. responds to snake-handling critics with new video showing him wrangling a venomous rattlesnake
Nebraska K9 sniffs out 525 pounds of cocaine during routine traffic stop, leading to California man’s arrest
EXCLUSIVE: Veterans turn war stories into music at Trump Kennedy Center in powerful patriotic showcase
Trump Debuts Brutal Cartoon Nickname for James Talarico to Kick Off Texas Senate General Election
Father admits leaving handgun within reach of young daughters before toddler fatally shot baby sister
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
