The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Hundreds of Christians Abducted in Largest Mass Kidnapping in Nigerian History Amid Country’s Anti-Christian Slaughter
Trans Cult Leader’s Attorney Scolds DOJ for Misgendering Him
Trump caps week of surprises — signing release of Epstein files, embracing unlikely allies at White House
Former Missouri substitute teacher gets 10 years for trading students money, drugs for sex
Trump, Kirk shootings expose online hate breeding lone-wolf assassins, experts warn
Trump administration expands efforts to stop Christian violence in Nigeria with aid threat
Watch Fox News’ Martha MacCallum Grill Dem Who Told Military to Defy Trump
Five Billion Dollars Off: California Officials Admit They Botched Deficit Estimate By Billions
Trump says Dems who told military to defy illegal orders committed ‘sedition at the highest level’
Texas National Guard to return from Illinois ahead of Thanksgiving, Gov Abbott says
Texas A&M committee finds professor’s firing over transgender-related lesson unjustified
Man fatally shot, woman and children in critical condition after Arizona shootout
President says Chicagoans are ‘chanting bring in Trump’ after violent downtown riot leaves 8 shot, 1 dead
JFK’s granddaughter, Tatiana Schlossberg, reveals terminal cancer diagnosis in heartbreaking essay
Op-Ed: The Aftermath of No Kings and the Warning it Sends to Us All
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.









