The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Ugandan Evangelist Killed by Suspected Muslims After Sharing the Gospel
Israel, Jews targeted worldwide as well-funded leftist, Islamist groups join for ‘Nakba 78’ protests
This Midwestern state leads the nation in home foreclosures as US filings jump by 26%
Marine Vet Stops Gunman’s 60-Round Shooting Spree: Thankfully He Had a Concealed Carry Permit
Momentum builds to pass bill after Jack Smith’s secret Arctic Frost subpoenas
Bronx man convicted of running secret Chinese police station in Manhattan used to monitor dissidents
Trump touts ‘fantastic trade deals’ in final Xi meeting amid tariff standoff
Trump reveals Xi’s stance on arming Iran as Hormuz tensions rattle markets
Trump says Xi agreed US became a ‘declining nation’ during Biden years
US moving to indict former Cuban leader Raúl Castro: source
Gavin Newsom’s Former Chief of Staff Pleads Guilty to 3 Federal Charges, Faces 38 Years in Prison
McMaster revives Trump-backed push to oust Biden kingmaker from Congress
Fox News Crew Snared by China’s Massive Surveillance System While Covering Trump Visit: ‘They See Everything’
Absurd: China Literally Changes Marco Rubio’s Name During Trip – Lets Communists Avoid Admitting They Made a Huge Mistake
Man shot at In-N-Out drive-thru drove family to safety with bullet lodged in head
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
