The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Shapiro responds to illegal immigrant trucker fiasco – says driver was in fed database first
Trump labels 6 Democrats who told troops to refuse unlawful orders ‘traitors’ who should be arrested
Another One: Man Accused of Setting Woman on Fire on Chicago Train Has 49 Previous Arrests, 10 Felonies
Shock Video: Adult Inexplicably Orders Child, 9, to Move Car – Neighbor’s Cam Caught Chaos That Followed
Biden’s Legacy: Illegal Driving 18-Wheeler Allegedly Killed National Guardsman, 23, in Another Needless Wreck
Holiday crime fears grow as ‘jugging’ thieves target shoppers carrying cash and gifts: ‘Only a matter of time’
It Was an Invasion – Huge Swaths of Students Missing From Classrooms as ICE Begins Enforcing Law in Charlotte, NC
Republicans facing ‘worst-case scenario’ in redistricting war as midterm elections near
Democrat indicted for alleged theft of disaster relief funds and more top headlines
Trump secures release of American trapped in Saudi Arabia for years over online posts
Texas father dies in accidental shooting on hunting trip, daughter says family is ‘heartbroken’
Federal judge allows Texas AG to challenge Harris County bail reforms: ‘Unleashing criminals’
Appeals court blocks order limiting immigration agents’ use of force in Chicago
Wealthy California town bans pickleball over noise complaints from paddles hitting balls
Senators warn of ‘fragile’ US air system after 43-day shutdown
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
