The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Former SLED investigator who testified at Alex Murdaugh trial fired from Charleston County Sheriff’s Office
Brooklyn coffee shop that targeted Jewish congressman faces DOJ probe after reported tax, health code issues
Nearby Residents Told to Stay Inside as Semi Carrying Millions of Bees Overturns
Senate Schedule Rearranged as Mitch McConnell Is Set to Miss Another Full Week of Voting
Republicans break with Trump to rebuke Iran war — but it won’t change policy
DHS demands New York sanctuary politicians honor detainer for man convicted of raping corpse on subway
Marjorie Taylor Greene follows Tucker Carlson in ditching the ‘America Last’ Republican Party
Iranian leaders project newfound confidence with international travel spree
Top Republican pitches Trump plan to stop shutdowns, expose ‘bad guys’ blocking voter ID law
Cruz says Mamdani, AOC, Platner show Democrats’ leftward shift: ‘That’s where the energy is’
Social media erupts over Mamdani’s silence after Brooklyn coffee shop bans Jewish congressman
MLB Issues Unexpected Response on Players With Bible Verses on Uniforms, Says They Will Never Be Fined
Air traffic control audio captures tense moment two planes nearly collided at Boston Logan Airport
Foreign Born Biden Judge Named ‘Sparkle’ Strikes Down Trump Database to Purge Illegal Voters Because It Purges Voters
Swalwell pal accused of using campaign cash to bankroll ‘luxury lifestyle’ — including Super Bowl tickets
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
