The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Top Chinese general purged from military on accusations of betraying Xi Jinping
Kanye West cites bipolar disorder in apology for antisemitic behavior: ‘I love Jewish people’
Battleground GOP lawmaker moves to block what he calls Democratic redistricting ‘power grab’
National Guard in Minnesota hands out coffee, donuts to anti-ICE protesters
Trump deploys border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota as ICE operations face violent chaos
Overnight Videos: MN Hotel Occupants Bar Doors With Vending Machines So Anti-ICE Rioters Can’t Get in, at Least One ICE Agent Left Bloodied
NPR Claims Trump’s ICE Is Detaining American Citizens: Turns Out Its Record Blows Obama’s ICE Out of the Water
Airplane crashes at Maine airport with 8 on board, FAA says
Battle for the soul of Democrats seen through prism of bitter Senate primaries
Records: Anti-DEI Republican Helped Install Ideology at Texas Health Center
Dan Bongino Explains to ‘Full-Diaper Media Morons’ Difference Between Being Podcaster And FBI Deputy Director
World Health Organization says US withdrawal makes the nation and the world ‘less safe’
Grieving families of DC midair collision say more needs to be done to fix safety concerns one year after tragedy
Anti-ICE agitators clash with federal agents at Minneapolis hotel, as agents deploy tear gas, flashbangs
JD Vance shares ‘crazy’ story of ICE and CBP officers being mobbed in Minneapolis
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
