The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
NASCAR Sues Michael Jordan, Slams His Racing Team as an ‘Illegal Cartel’
Boy Who Went Missing in 2017 Found Unharmed After Suspicious Deputies Pulled the Loose Thread
CA Judge Gives Evil Man Sentence of His Dreams for Sexually Assaulting, Disfiguring Woman With Rock
Blue state mayor proposes city ordinance to strengthen transgender care protections in the face of Trump EOs
Recently Elected Democrat Charged with 8 Counts of Theft
Armed Thug Agrees to Hostage Swap, Doesn’t Realize New Victim Is a Retired Boxer
Feel-Good Story: After Laying Off 200, CNN Set to Give Jennings Big Raise – Report
Las Vegas reality TV star ‘blacked out,’ killed woman in drug-fueled rage: documentary
Killer Lori Vallow, ‘doomsday mom,’ says Jesus spoke to her in spiritual vision, showed her prison release
Abducted Priest Found Murdered on Ash Wednesday
Republicans call for Trump to cut off American Bar Association
Congress unveils spending plan after Trump calls on Republicans to avoid government shutdown
One of Worst Deaths Possible: Hackman, Wife’s Causes of Death Confirmed, Grisly Revelation
White House Report Card: A target in motion is harder to hit
ICE raids at schools: Federal judge gives green light
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
