The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Blue state governor candidate claims he ‘met Satan in person’ in resurfaced podcast episode
Mamdani gives influencers special access as Signal use raises records-law questions
Democrats in Close Midterm Races Keep Telling Kamala Harris to Stay Away
Lindsay Clancy Fans Start Sick TikTok Trend Pretending to Kill Their Babies
Minneapolis apartment shooting suspect was facing eviction: report
Powerful union leader backs Republican in key Senate showdown
Maduro claims immunity, asks judge to dismiss drug-trafficking charges against him and his wife
When gunman forced his way into Virginia elementary school, superintendent says lockdown procedures worked
Gloria Steinem, outspoken feminist leader, dies at 92
Newsom’s South Carolina trip doubles as test of Democrats’ rebuilding strategy
High School Football Hotshots Snub Opponents in Pre-Game Handshake, Get Taught a Lesson on the Field
Deported Milo Yiannopoulos Makes Predictable Turn to the Left, Decries Immigration Enforcement, How ‘Institutionalized the Brutality’ in US Is
2028 Dem hopeful’s longtime ally exposed for deep ties to CCP officials: ‘Good friends’
GOP mail-in voting proposal could impact millions of Americans ahead of midterms
DOJ threatens to cut billions in welfare funding from states for failing to report illegal migrants
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
