The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Maryland’s lone congressional Republican blasts Moore’s redistricting push as alleged 2028 White House play
Woman Sues Yankees for $10 Million After Scary Incident at Game
Counterterrorism expert warns Abdul El-Sayed Senate bid raises homeland security concerns
Humiliation for Ireland: Famously Anti-Israel State’s New ‘Air Force One’ Can’t Always Land Safely After They Banned Jewish State’s Technology
Nancy Guthrie investigators see uptick in tips after ransom notes release: Sheriff
Alex Murdaugh demands new evidence search in hunt for cracks in case
Blanche’s Attorney General Confirmation Hanging in the Balance After 2nd Republican Announces Opposition
Mother of Slain Citadel Cadet Speaks Out After Repeat Criminal Is Arrested for His Murder
Resurfaced Mamdani interview ignites internet frenzy over alleged ‘fake’ Ugandan accent
Anti-abortion groups applaud Blanche review of Biden DOJ policy on mailing abortion drugs
GOP senator deals crushing blow to Trump’s AG nominee after Alaska lobbying blitz
What Do Jesus and the Bible Have to Say About Socialism?
Trump-backed incumbent ousted in House primary as GOP redistricting push set to reshape Tennessee
Trump’s Smithsonian clash exposes striking pattern among museum curators
Trump-backed incumbent loses primary after super PAC bankrolled by Dems meddled in race
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
