The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Woke Formula One Driver Visits, Condemns Wall Imprisoning Palestinians – Clearly Has No Idea Egypt Actually Built It
The Genius Voting System We Could Use That Rewards Working, Military Service, and Age – Penalizes Taking Welfare, Being Criminal
Anti-Trump Republican courts other defectors as House weighs another vote against Iran war
Pentagon’s former UFO investigator offers simple theory for mysterious jellyfish-shaped object on video
Florida Republican on Democrats’ strategy: ‘That’s the choice they have to make…persecution or policy’
Natalee Holloway’s confessed killer caught trying to extort $250K from grieving mother in FBI sting video
From Democrats’ midterm romp to the MLB, many victors come out of the blue
Blue wave hits Vance’s 2028 chances
Newsom’s 2028 announcement puts Democrats on notice, but rivals aren’t rushing to follow
Watch: Baby Saved from Planned Parenthood After Sidewalk Counselor Convinces Father to Intervene
Struggling Canadian Vet Calls VA for Help, Says Caseworker Suggested He Consider Killing Himself With Canada’s New ‘Assisted Dying Service’
Inside the House GOP strategy to capitalize on Democrats’ warring factions in the new Congress
Trump keeps signaling an end to Iran war, but expert warns a crucial piece of his strategy is missing
Republicans unwilling to force an end to Iran war despite midterm beating
Richard Fowler wins Washington Examiner election contest
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
