The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump contrasts ‘tough’ Vance to ‘velvet’ Rubio during Board of Peace meeting
GOP rips FISA court for tapping ex-Biden ‘disinformation’ lawyer to advise on surveillance
Hunter Biden’s former ‘sugar brother’ lawyer drops big money on Swalwell’s campaign: ‘Biggest cheerleader’
Watch: DC Water Manager Admitted Deciding Agency Had Too Many Whites – DEI Fixed That But Also Covered DC in 240 Million Gallons of Raw Sewage
BREAKING: Former Prince Andrew Arrested in Epstein Case
DC Mayor Bowser declares emergency over Potomac sewage spill, asks for federal help
RNC sues to stop Democrats’ Virginia redistricting push
California avalanche that killed 8 is deadliest in state history
Inside ICE’s battle with local Democrats to convert warehouses into detention centers
Former Prince Andrew of the UK has reportedly been arrested and more top headlines
Strapped New Yorkers swarm chaotic Mamdani-inspired free grocery store pop-up: We’re ‘in pain’
Trump hits campaign trail in key battleground as race to replace Marjorie Taylor Greene heats up
Is DEI Dead? Jasmine Crockett’s Texas Senate Run Seems Like an Afterthought Following Colbert’s James Talarico Stunt
LATE BREAKING: Massive Guthrie Kidnapping Break – FBI Now Has Names and Photos of Suspects
Hiker dies of hypothermia after slipping off trail near summit of New York’s tallest mountain
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
