The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Dem AG running for higher office dodges questions on bid to free man who killed pregnant woman
Spanberger’s data center plan on collision course with her party’s green energy push, critics warn
King of Jordan and president of Turkey praise Trump, slam Israel for Gaza war
Bill Clinton criticizes Trump’s Kennedy Center renaming battle: ‘It’s hard to make up’
Breaking: Vance’s Task Force Purges 760,000 Names from Obamacare Rolls After Uncovering Rampant Fraud
Trump-backed Senate candidate says ‘Groceries cost too much,’ calls for Iran war to ‘end quickly’
Insiders Say Sports Gambling Giant Specifically Targets Bettors Most Likely to Be Addicts Who Lose
Trump Jr under scrutiny from own party over Putin-linked oligarch’s lavish gift
Nolan Wells’ friends cleared by grand jury as their lawyers vow to hold online accusers accountable
‘American Idol’ contestant’s murder case sent cops underground with high-powered magnet to find gun
El-Sayed Is Delighted to Have Tucker Carlson’s Support: ‘MAGA Eating Itself’
The UK’s Most Prominent Lib Outlet Keeps Trying to Make the Phrase ‘Petro-Masculinity’ Happen, Publishes Yet Another Article About Fake Climate Trend
Pentagon unveils battlefield test to ensure new generals are warfighters – not Washington bureaucrats
Fox News Power Rankings: For the Democrats, where could it possibly go wrong?
El-Sayed’s Jewish outreach ignites ‘tokenism’ fury as Michigan GOP chair makes bold prediction
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
