The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Conservative firebrand vows to purge ‘RINOs’ in battle to replace retiring Vern Buchanan in open Florida seat
When anti-ICE clashes trigger federal intervention: Experts explain the constitutional breaking point
Nancy Guthrie’s Neighbor Details Mysterious Sighting Shortly Before Disappearance
Actor and Producer Timothy Busfield Charged with Committing Child Sex Crimes on Set
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Nancy Guthrie’s abduction, Ohio dentist’s autopsy, Suitcase Killer’s sentence
Chagos handover in limbo after Trump softens on deal, bill pulled from UK Parliament
Second federal judge blocks IRS from sharing addresses with ICE
NFL Under Fire After Awards Show Is Marred by Multiple ‘Unprofessional and Disrespectful’ Gaffes
More than a dozen anti-ICE agitators hauled away by NYPD near Columbia University
Nigeria’s first lady says US strikes were a ‘blessing,’ welcomes collaboration with Trump
House Oversight Committee Sends Demand to Ilhan Omar’s Husband
Republicans blast Democrats’ Trump election meddling claims as hypocritical ‘conspiracy theory’
Mounds of Snow and Trash Are Just the Opening Act of Mamdani’s Collectivist New York
Who is Kyle Wagner? Meet the self-identified Antifa member arrested after targeting ICE
Maryland Man Charged with Attempting to Murder Trump Administration Official
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
