The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Mamdani’s wife co-hosts luxe Muslim retreat casting Virgin Mary as ‘Palestinian woman’ under occupation
Trump says he’s Iran’s ‘No. 1’ target as renewed conflict raises assassination fears
Trump’s popularity among Israelis fades after Iran MOU
Could the Nevada governor’s race outcome run through Canada
Sanders under fire for propping up Platner as Dems torch his toxic endorsement ‘pattern’
WATCH: Dr. Oz says Newsom, other blue states have turned Medicaid fraud into a ‘feature’
The five days that made us believe in sports again
Tyler Robinson hearing: Top moments from explosive Lance Twiggs interview played in court
Florida man who contacted police about 1987 killing arrested in connection to cold case
Dramatic bodycam video captures NYPD officer rescuing woman from top of Brooklyn Bridge after emotional plea
Queens man arrested with Molotov cocktails after alleged arson attacks on Ozone Park and Woodhaven churches
Eight indicted over plan to attack White House UFC fight with drones and snipers
Israel shares intelligence warning Iran plotted new assassination attempt against Trump: report
Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase Consider Teaming Up for Scheme to Extract Higher Card Transaction Fees
Robinson’s Alleged Kirk Assassination Rifle and Chilling Messages on Bullet Casings Shown in Court
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
