The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
FBI arrests leftist Senate hopeful for alleged death threats against Trump, Congress member and daughter
Rideshare passenger held hostage for eight hours during armed standoff with police in swanky neighborhood
Trump Offers New Retirement Account Opportunity to Americans
Bernie Sanders campaigns with controversial Michigan Senate candidate
Building the White House Ballroom Shouldn’t Be a Partisan Issue After Horrific WHCD Shooting
Pritzker calls for criminal investigations into ICE agents over ‘Midway Blitz’ conduct
California leaders mum on $1B high-speed rail detour aimed at preserving disgraced labor leader’s memorial
Research Team Reveals the Secret of Ancient Biblical Manuscript
Tensions between John Thune and Mike Johnson loom over GOP immigration push
After NASCAR’s Greg Biffle And Family Died, Police Think ‘Friends’ Stole from Them
State Department fires back at accusations of ‘empty planes’ rescuing Americans from conflict zones
Inside the coming battle over Virginia’s abortion ballot referendum
Iowa woman died following hernia repair after nurses dismissed painful post-surgery symptoms: lawsuit
Shooting during party at Oklahoma’s Arcadia Lake leaves at least 10 wounded, police say
Marco Rubio spotted behind DJ booth at family wedding as social media reacts to viral clip
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
