The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
SEE IT: Chinese nationals intercepted in ‘extremely dangerous’ infiltration attempt near Florida coast
Blue state gov ignites online firestorm with plan to send gov’t into homes of newborn babies: ‘Lunatic libs’
Hegseth thinks the solution to his woes is to ‘send himself.’ It’s not
Breaking: Fox News Joins Mainstream Media Networks in White House Boycott
Undercover Video Outs Heresy in Talarico’s Longtime Church: They Hand Out ‘Rewritten’ Bibles That Defy God’s Identity
‘American Idol’ contestant’s 100K texts with mistress show motive in wife’s murder, prosecutors say
Critics pounce as prominent Dem senator seems to make admission about party’s far-left ‘fringe’
Social media erupts over Hasan Piker post targeting Brandon Gill’s wife
Video: After Dozens of US Historical Statues Removed by Left, Indians in TX Have Built Gargantuan 90 Ft. Statue to Pagan ‘God’
Tourists seeking ‘dramatic’ photo on isolated beach trapped by incoming tide
Trump allies building ‘lawfare’ defense apparatus before possible Democratic takeover
Judge Blocks Blue State from Making Nuns Perform Assisted Suicide But It’s Not Over Yet
House GOP not done with ActBlue after bombshell internal memos raise foreign cash questions
GOP takes aim at Congress’ next ‘get filthy rich’ loophole after stock-trading ban
Socialists are helping GOP campaigns heading into November
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
