News Opinons Politics

Supreme Court To Decide Whether Trump Administration Can End DACA Program

The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.

The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.

Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.


DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.

The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.


Video shows masked robbers crash car through jewelry store entrance, steal owner’s gun in brazen heist
Barack and Michelle Obama slam ICE after Minneapolis shooting, urge accountability
Tim Walz compares Minnesota ICE actions to Holocaust and Anne Frank: ‘Hiding in their houses’
ICE says violent mob helped criminal escape and left ICE agent permanently maimed
Iran may have killed over 30,000 protesters in two days: Report
Dems silent on Minnesota church disruption after pressing Bondi to use FACE Act on pro-lifers
Carney pushes back on Trump’s 100% tariff threat over China trade deals with Canada amid tensions
Here Are the Worst Countries on Earth for Christian Persecution
Texas cult in crosshairs of killer mom’s bathtub slayings case as questions hang over family horror
Popular Potato Product Faces Recall in 26 States
Can Trump Really Denaturalize Somalis En Masse?
Tim Walz Was the Most Scandal-Plagued Governor Running in 2026: Katie Hobbs Just Stole That Title
Mamdani announces remote school day due to dangerous winter storm conditions
GOP lawmaker renews oversight hearing request of DHS agencies following fatal shooting in Minneapolis
Terrible Sign for Midterms: GOP Losing Independents By Massive 22-Point Margin
See also  Trump brags about secret weapon that was key to Maduro capture: ‘The discombobulator’

The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.

DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.

The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.

The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter