The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony Now Begging Supporters for Another $250,000
New Mexico’s Dem Governor Triggered After Trump Jokingly Suggests New Name for Her State
Radical Muslim Kills Gay Pro-Palestine Activist Outside Gay Bar
WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Surges to Commanding Lead, Vance Cruises Past Massie
Alleged cryptoscam ringleader set for plea hearing in $240M bitcoin theft
Sherrill anti-ICE policy hammered after fleeing migrant driver injures Dem mayor’s wife
New California Bill Could Completely Disqualify Former ICE Agents from Public Employment
‘We’re Scared, Very Scared’: Weeping Spanish Girl Reveals Heartbreaking Reality of Mass Migration from Africa
Sen Jim Justice finds way through Senate polarization to bring WWII hero memorial to DC
Israel’s ambassador says NYC’s Mamdani is ‘sowing chaos’ ahead of Netanyahu’s UN appearance
Gary Sinise 9/11 documentary wants to inspire Americans with hope
Florida AG seeks death penalty for couple who allegedly held 4 children in ‘rolling prison’ for nearly 7 years
Former USCIS official, accomplice charged in alleged $960K citizenship bribery scheme
Dramatic video captures floodwaters bursting through glass doors of college students’ home
Trump appears to debut darker hair, sparking online buzz
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
