The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Sanders becomes first senator to say Israel committing genocide in Gaza
Judge orders Mahmoud Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria
Immigration judge orders deportation of Mahmoud Khalil to Syria or Algeria
Cornell MBA council warns ‘non-marginalized’ students to avoid minority recruiting events: report
Spirit Airlines pilot scolded after straying too close to Trump’s Air Force One
What Saved the US in the Late 1960s Appears to Be Happening Again, Particularly After Kirk’s Assassination
New Hampshire daycare worker who secretly gave kids melatonin spared jail
Trump to designate antifa a ‘major terrorist organization’
Breaking: Kimmel Booted from Air Over Kirk Comments, ABC to ‘Replace the Show with Other Programming’
Alert: Multiple Officers Down in PA Shooting, Mexican Consulate Issues Strange Message Immediately After
ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel indefinitely following Charlie Kirk comments
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Kash clashes with the Senate
Cruz doubles down against groups funding Charlie Kirk protests; FBI director backs bill during hearing
Mother and Her Two Teen Daughters Stabbed in Their Own Apartment in the Middle of the Night
Pastor: Charlie Kirk’s graphic death was ‘traumatic’ as many Americans reconcile with loss
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
