The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump spares no one at WHCA dinner, taking aim at Dems, press and his own Cabinet
Gretchen Whitmer endorses moderate Haley Stevens in tight upcoming Senate primary
Trump orders signs outside Smithsonian museum amid row over its depiction of American history
California trans suspect arrested in mother’s killing after neighbor recalls heated argument
House Republicans confront NJ governor over 6,600 noncitizens registered to vote in alleged software failure
Illegal immigrant who killed Nashville restaurant owner to face ICE deportation after prison
Jon Bon Jovi Abruptly Ends Madison Square Garden Show: ‘I’m Gonna Have to Cool It’
White House Moves to ‘Restore Trust’ in Smithsonian Institution
Sophie Cunningham’s New Shoes Sell Out in Hours After Her Stand Against Wokeness
White House Correspondents’ Association dinner do-over features enhanced security measures, smaller crowd
NATO Country Shoots Down Suspected Russia Drone for First Time
Succession: Why Congress has no clear plan when lawmakers can’t serve
Combat vet senator chokes up over fallen friend in fiery floor speech about Iran war: ‘We will finish it’
EXCLUSIVE: ICE removes former NFL player Daniel Ogama Adongo after visa overstay, criminal record
Trump says Saudi nuclear agreement won’t move forward without Abraham Accords: ‘They have to be a member’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
