The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
‘He hated women’: Explosive abuse, new Nazi tattoo allegations from exes rock Platner’s campaign
‘I Would Rape Them to Show Them I’m Dominant’ – Graham Platner’s Campaign Won’t Dispute Shocking Quote in NYT Report
Israel-Lebanon ceasefire could undermine Hezbollah and Iran with state-to-state cooperation
Hunter Biden could mount a successful White House bid given recent Democrat picks: Trump
BREAKING: NYT Drops Graham Platner Domestic Violence Bombshell Report – Scared, Left Marks, Wrenched Arms, According to Ex-Girlfriend
Woman’s body washes ashore in Florida as investigators dig into beach discovery
Shelter-in-place order issued in Chicago suburb as police hunt suspect after reported shooting
Trump Upbraids 4 Republicans Who Sided with Dems on Iran War Powers Resolution Vote During Peace Negotiations
Bessent spars with Dem in fiery Trump tax showdown until claim crosses the line: ‘Slanderous’
SEE IT: Lavish $35M mansion bought by tech CEO accused of feeding US gear to Iran’s nuclear machine
Famous YouTuber Doesn’t Get the Response He Hoped for After Explaining Why He Murdered His Unborn Child
Ayatollah says Iran has ‘defeated’ US as Trump, Rubio acknowledge he’s playing active role in regime
DeSantis Rips California’s ‘Corrosive’ Election System: ‘Count Until You Get the Result You Want?’
Watch: Chaos Erupts at High School Graduation When Graduates Begin Punching Each Other
Tulsi Gabbard reveals husband’s ‘very rare sacral chordoma’: ‘In a lot of pain’ after 7-hour surgery
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
