The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Sanders pushes ‘death penalty’ for crucial US industry that could give advantage to foreign adversaries
Mamdani under fire after symbolic 9/11 pen goes to former al Qaeda defense lawyer
Tragedy Shuts Down Christian Music Festival: Pastor Killed By High Winds and Collapsing Sign
While the Media Panics Over AI, Prisons Use It to Stop Rapes, Fights, and $200M Headcounts
X Caught a 200K-Account Chinese Bot Farm Pushing Panic Over AI Data Centers
Chinese Police Dragged a Pastor Away: Now He’s Spreading the Gospel Through the Prison System
‘Destroying the American way of life’: El-Sayed’s political orbit complicates effort to moderate his image
Mask-Off Moment: Palestinian Journo Calls African American Hakeem Jeffries an ‘AIPAC Monkey’
Kushner, Witkoff set for Kyiv talks after Putin meeting in US push for peace
Canada Talked Tough with Trump: Now Job Losses Hit 42K as Tariffs Are Set to Hit Harder
House Dems plot Trump investigation blitz if they seize majority
Karmelo Anthony seeks $250K for murder appeal as questions persist over family’s previous $634K fundraiser
California pizza joint allegedly used as meth distribution hub as illegal immigrant charged
Kennedy Center ceiling partially collapses as Trump-led board pushes for 2-year closure
Machete-wielding MS-13 gangster wanted for murder walks free after Biden-appointed judge releases him: DHS
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
