The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders
Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify
Trump Admin Rolls Out Big Beautiful Bill’s Health Savings Accounts That Lower Taxable Income, Earn Interest
Former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot tells Border Patrol official his ‘day of reckoning is fast approaching’
Lauren Boebert Lashes Out at Trump After He Vetoes Her Bill
Kohberger plea, Cincinnati beating, Read verdict fuel 2025’s most viral, controversial moments
Congress fails to save Obamacare subsidies after shutdown fight, premiums set to surge
Former GOP Sen Jon Kyl announces dementia diagnosis, steps away from public life
Mamdani picks educator who worked to dismantle Gifted & Talented program as NYC schools chancellor
Former Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell dead at 92
Democrat Renee Hardman wins Iowa Senate special election, denying GOP supermajority
Missing elderly person found in bitter cold woods after police deploy thermal imaging drone
DHS reviews citizenship cases from Somalia, other high risk countries for possible fraud
Judge suggests DOJ leadership pushed for Kilmar Abrego Garcia prosecution
Florida firefighters allegedly waterboarded, whipped rookie over TikTok video as 4 face criminal charges
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.









