The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community
MAHA heavyweights try to put Lahn over the top in Iowa governor’s race
Mamdani Keeps Taking Over NYPD Training Facility for Personal Use, and Police Union Officials Are Furious
Bill Gates Claims Artifical Intelligence Will Force Some to Choose an ‘Amish’ Lifestyle
Watch: Anti-ICE Protesters Accidentally Infuriate Immigrants While Blocking Brooklyn Bridge
Emergency declared at South Carolina nuclear site after fire erupts at lab
Conservative Journalists James O’Keefe and Cam Higby Indicted in Minnesota After Exposing Election System in Undercover Video
Convicted murderer got over 5-hour head start after prison escape before local police were notified: official
Judge Overseeing Maduro Case in New York Dies Before Trial
ALERT: Dominion-Related Lawsuit Dismissed Against Patrick Byrne Over ‘The Deep Rig’ Film – No Legal Basis for Key Claim
Flavio Bolsonaro declares himself ‘true elected president of Brazil’ after fleeing to US with blessing of the White House
Arab Israeli parties emerge as wild card in parliamentary elections
Woman wearing burka escorted out of Florida county meeting after playing call to prayer recording
Manhattan 9/11 Memorial Desecrated by Anti-Second Amendment Radical
Dem AG’s ‘too many golf courses’ remark goes viral as critics tee off
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
