The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump says Democrats replacing Platner is ‘very hard for them to do’
Trump’s voter ID bill catches unlikely break as McConnell remains sidelined
DOJ’s Harmeet Dhillon: Some states have ‘homework to do’ to keep noncitizens from voting in midterm elections
House Republican Thomas Massie suggests Obamacare could now be labeled ‘Trumpcare’
Trump holds Washington hostage over SAVE Act as midterm clock ticks on GOP control
Maryland may finally see redistricting action — just not the way Wes Moore wanted
US on track to intercept 16 times as many suspected terrorists at border under Trump thanks to cartel designations
Music and patriotism: Dukes of Hazzard star praises community and family at Great American State Fair
Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing: Judge orders redactions to ex-lover’s video testimony
Social media influencer and model, 22, killed in violent highway crash
Trump threatens troop withdrawals if ‘very good deal’ on Greenland isn’t struck
Stepdad accused of sex assault as cops widen probe into girl’s lethal Benadryl ingredient dose
More than 30 injured after Maryland transit bus crashes into building near Baltimore
House Dem back in the spotlight as brother faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted
Platner drops out of crucial Senate race after bombshell rape allegation torpedoes campaign
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
