The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Watch: Scott Jennings Goes Nuclear on Democrats ‘Punching Down’ on Top Trump Aide
Lindsay Clancy Blamed ‘A Male Voice’ for Ordering Her to Kill Her Children: Court Testimony
El-Sayed booked for major Islamic convention alongside clerics with radical pasts
Progressives notch victory in race to replace Swalwell following sexual assault scandal
Derek Chauvin’s Attorney Makes ‘Bombshell’ Motion to Dismiss, Alleging ‘Fraudulent’ Conduct by Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
Democrats who ‘never voted Republican’ back Rogers over El-Sayed in razor-close race
Angel Dad takes major new role after daughter’s killing sparks sweeping illegal alien crackdown
Police identify suspect accused of terrorizing Philadelphia women while wearing creepy Chucky-style mask
NBA Vet Hoping to Join WNBA as First ‘Trans’ Player Says He’s Coming for Caitlin Clark’s Biggest Hater, Angel Reese
Philadelphia woman says she used stage combat training to fight off masked man chasing residents
Oil flows and Iranian economic woes give White House much-needed PR reprieve around war
Bass and Raman clash over homelessness, public safety, and Hollywood in heated Los Angeles mayoral debate
Key Democratic Senate Candidate’s Campaign Descends Into ‘Complete Chaos’
FBI raids Eric Swalwell’s property, seizes devices at airport in sexual misconduct investigation
Sherrill escalates Trump fight over voter fiasco day after Mullin praises NJ cooperation
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
