The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Non-citizen police officers approved after Dem says ICE ‘invasion’ ‘sends a message’
Pelosi, Omar join Trump and Schiff as unlikely alliance pushes to onshore key industry
California congresswoman did not disclose money her husband received from nonprofit
Air traffic controllers turn on FAA chief as tensions boil over
43-Year-Old College Freshman with Extensive Criminal Past Arrested for Alleged Dorm Sexual Assault
Alabama Police Department Calls Out Local Seniors for Weak Attempt at a Senior Prank: ‘That’s It?’
Newsom appearance in rural South Carolina draws split-screen of support and protesters
Trump commutes sentence for former Philadelphia union official, attorney says
Former Trump Cabinet official had ‘inappropriately close’ relationship with bodyguard, IG finds
Javier Milei escalates Falkland Islands feud after Trump questions UK backing
Susan Collins Gives Hilarious Answer to Whether She’ll Bring Up Troy Jackson’s ‘Personal Life’ in Maine Senate Race
Top DHS lawyer turns tables on 128 ex-judges after Bar declines ‘Worst of the Worst’ complaint
Lindsay Clancy jury enters Day 7 after bombshell one-juror standoff and more top headlines
Ted Cruz names ‘most powerful Democrat’ as he warns socialist rise has paralyzed bipartisanship
Blue state school district accused of defying Supreme Court, hiding gender transitions from parents
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
