The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Dems sidestep past ‘refuse illegal orders’ demands as they challenge Trump’s Iran war authority
Iran could use detained Americans as ‘sweetener’ in nuclear talks, ex-hostage envoy warns
Air Force Academy’s ‘CULEX’ puts thousands of cadets through realistic 24-hour combat simulation
Trump set to read Scripture from the Oval Office during ‘America Reads the Bible’ event starting Sunday
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Dem teachers groom ‘foot soldiers,’ justice served to anti-Israel group
RFK Jr clashes with Dem lawmaker over Trump’s mental fitness in heated exchange
Gold Star father says prior Afghanistan review smelled ‘like a cover-up’ as new look examines millions of docs
Fact Check: Did Pete Hegseth Accidentally Quote a ‘Fake Bible Verse from Pulp Fiction’?
Skeletal remains found by hikers in Washington state woods identified as woman missing since 2024
Two boys dead after illegal immigrant from Mexico allegedly drove drunk and hit them on a sidewalk
Grieving mothers scorch Dem lawmaker after he pivots during hearing to attack ‘MAGA Republicans’
Newsom PAC bought thousands of memoir copies about his hardships, juicing sales
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Brian Hooker’s release, Tyler Robinson’s ATF report, DNA in Guthrie case
Report: California Using Taxpayer Funds to Give Homeless Transgender Illegals Sex Changes
Iran Has ‘Agreed to Everything,’ Trump Says
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
