The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Arizona man allegedly paralyzed by Nancy Guthrie sheriff’s deputies after alleged swatting call demands $176M
Illegal immigrant suspect charged in crash that killed police officer and his girlfriend
Left’s latest socialist darling dragged over ‘whiteness’ comments pulling in her own family: ‘Weirdo racism’
Top media outlets fail to disclose who is bankrolling their AI reporters
Watch: Oxford Debate on Islam Goes Off Rails When Man Threatens to Show Pic of Mohammed – Terror and Dead Silence Descend, Then the Fight Starts
Watch: Camera Catches Animated Meeting Between Sophie Cunningham and Trans Activist Coach of Opposing Team
Senate committee advances Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination
WATCH: GOP senator unloads on ‘creature of Washington’ challenger in critical Senate showdown
Historian blasts Smithsonian’s activism shift after first visit in over a decade: ‘Completely different place’
Midterm Countdown: Republicans get a glimmer of hope
Washington man arrested on arson charge tied to devastating Spokane wildfire
Pennsylvania school bus aide accused of sexually assaulting special needs teen
Federal judge blocks New York law banning ICE agents from wearing masks
California mom begged for help before ex gunned her down in front of their 4-year-old son: DA
ICE detainee who illegally re-entered US after deportation dies at Delaney Hall
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
