The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Schumer backs GOP’s plan to bring the pain during future shutdowns: ‘I’m going to vote for it’
Breaking: Marty Makary Is Out as FDA Commissioner – Acting Replacement Named
Indiana’s Cignetti Gifts Trump Custom Hoosiers Jersey as NCAA Champs Visit WH: ‘I Like This Guy’
Military vet sees opening for GOP in blue state amid ‘embarrassment’ of ‘stolen valor Walz’
Democrats Attempt to Bully House Republican Into Resigning Over ‘Racism’ Against Hakeem Jeffries
Career Criminal Opens Fire on Police Officers While Out on Parole for the Same Crime
Judge in Tiger Woods hearing allows access to drug records
Warsh confirmed as Fed governor, with vote on chairmanship to follow
Once doomed, Trump’s pick to carry out his economic vision clears first crucial hurdle
Court hears arguments on Missouri’s new map as Democrats try to claw back GOP redistricting gains
Virginia GOP leader blasts ‘power-hungry’ Jeffries as Dems mount ‘insane’ gambit to overpower high court
Mother’s Day dinner dispute turns violent as man accused of stabbing grandmother 11 times: police
27 cruise ship workers deported after CBP discovered trove of child pornography
Pentagon’s declassified UAP footage fuels Americans’ belief in aliens: ‘We’re not alone’
Senate weighs new, painful leverage tactic as fears of another government shutdown grow
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
