The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Breaking: FBI Raids ‘Quality Learning Center’ and 21 Other Locations in Somali Fraud Crackdown
OPEC Unexpectedly Loses a Member in Shock to Global Oil Market
Inside the hottest party in town as royal mania takes over Washington
Rep Cory Mills draws first Republican challenger as sexual misconduct allegations, expulsion threat mount
FBI raids Minneapolis childcare facilities, part of sweeping fraud investigation
Three college frats in crosshairs as hazing claims of booze, burns and hospital trips spark crackdown: school
Brooklyn attack leaves 3 injured, suspect wearing Iranian flag shirt arrested by NYPD
Mike Johnson says King Charles’s speech to Congress will be a ‘unifying event’
Recall Issued for Fitness Item Amid Dangerous Injuries: 50K Units Affected, Victims’ Bones Broken
Democrat Governor Hopeful’s SPLC Board Tenure Overlapped with Alleged Payments to Extremist ‘Informants’
SPLC kept paying Aryan Nations operatives after bragging about bankrupting them
Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist is running for mayor of St. Pete
AI boom tests GOP’s midterm affordability pitch as price pain spreads
WHCA shooting exposes concerns over succession security, number of ‘celebrity’ Cabinet officials at big events
Congress responds to WHCA attack with five separate bills to build Trump’s ballroom
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
