The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
You Could See Drones Buzzing All Over the Country: Trump Admin Expands Drone Operations
‘I’m Not Kidding’: FBI Agent Wanted to Charge Elon Musk for Asking Federal Workers What They Did That Week
Police officer, woman shot near Notre Dame after football tailgates
El-Sayed’s Senate bid raises new concerns over a powerful privilege that comes with the job
Trump says Triumphal Arch will be converted into ‘top-grade’ military complex
ICE-led Florida operation nets 500 — including illegal aliens accused of murder, child abuse, cartel ties
Several Were Illegal Aliens: DOJ Announces 16 Culprits Caught Illegally Voting in Federal Elections
WATCH: Exclusive look at blue-collar workforce fueling America’s AI boom
DSA Chapter Leader Resigns, Warns ‘Frightening’ and ‘Extreme’ Radicals Are Running the Show
WATCH: AI safety scare sparks Cap Hill fight over guardrails: ‘China’s going to eat our lunch’
‘Not a slam dunk’: Trump’s 2028 mail-vote push hinges on one big legal question
El Sayed-aligned Islamic council with alleged terrorism financing ties issued fatwa to financially support Muslim candidates
Trey Gowdy talks about his new novel and what he’s up to next
US military strikes alleged narco-trafficking vessel in Caribbean, killing 4 ‘narco-terrorists’
Justice Department charges 16 across multiple states with alleged illegal voting, election crimes
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
