The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Dem lawmaker sparks online firestorm after saying Iryna Zarutska mural doesn’t align with city’s values
Former San Francisco Human Rights Commission leader accused of ‘self-dealing,’ public corruption
Ground Stops Ordered for DC-Area Airports
Vance: White House Plans to ‘Go After’ Ilhan Omar for Alleged Immigration Fraud
NYC Dem, Hochul aide under investigation over alleged migrant shelter bribes
Democrats pounce on $4 a gallon gas, blame Trump’s Iran war for ‘broken promise’
Woman Tries Getting Birth Certificate, SS Card, and Marriage License to See if Dems Are Honest – Says She Caught Them Lying Through Their Teeth
Trump Seethes After France Blocks American Military Planes: ‘The USA Will Remember’
Hegseth reveals covert visit to troops fighting in Operation Epic Fury
Trump’s proposed presidential library revealed as towering Miami skyscraper in striking new video
Outrage grows as ICE detainer ignored in connection to killing of 24-year-old mother and more top headlines
Scoop: House Speaker Mike Johnson’s allies unleash $10M campaign to spotlight Trump tax cuts
Florida county’s Democratic Party chair accused of hitting man in head with bullhorn at ‘No Kings’ protest
Trump reveals first look at presidential library in Miami
Teacher of the Year finalist gets 14 years for sexual relationship with student she kept contacting
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
