The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump says Supreme Court ruling against birthright citizenship order would benefit China
Family member of armed man who breached Mar-a-Lago perimeter describes personality, politics
Death toll rises after Mexican drug cartel leader killed in US-backed operation
Americans stranded in Puerto Vallarta describe city turning into war zone and more top headlines
MAGA Right sours on Thune over SAVE Act fight
How Trump’s ICE Built Nationwide Police Alliance Right Under Democrats’ Noses
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thune Should Use This Trick to Get the SAVE Act Passed
DHS shutdown drags into week two as Iran threat, SOTU clash complicate Hill talks
Who is Abigail Spanberger, and why did Democrats choose her for to their State of the Union response?
Trump invites US men’s hockey team to attend State of the Union speech
Greenland rejects Trump’s hospital ship: ‘No thanks’
‘It’s hidden’: Female genital mutilation and the secret shame of Minnesota’s Somalis
Greenland rejects Trump’s hospital ship proposal, citing existing free healthcare system
USA Men’s Hockey Wins First Gold Medal Since 1980 ‘Miracle on Ice’
AOC blames critics, Trump after Munich hiccup backlash
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
