The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
ICE arrests Peruvian national accused of illegally voting in 2024 election as DHS cites similar cases
TPUSA Official Explains How ‘Ghouls’ Celebrating Anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s Death Are Actually Helping His Cause
Deep Dive: One Year On, ‘A Million Charlie Kirks’ Have Not Yet Emerged, But Disunity and Insanity Have
James Talarico needles Ken Paxton amid GOP midterm convention
Family of 9/11 hero to retrace his steps in final Tunnel to Towers stop
Illegal convicted of assaulting high school girls thought he was free — then DHS dropped the hammer
How to make more Charlie Kirks: Inside TPUSA’s gap-year alternative to the ‘college scam’
Watch: Spontaneous Tribute to Charlie Kirk Erupts as Trump Honors Erika at RNC Midterm Convention
In Hindsight, Trump’s Decision to Save TikTok Was a Colossal Mistake
National Cryptologic Museum unveils historic Osama bin Laden exhibit
Republican sounds alarm on rising Dem star: ‘This guy’s going to be a problem’
Zohran Mamdani urged to skip New York City’s 9/11 memorial: ‘Vile antisemite’
Houthis seize port city in offensive aimed toward Bab el-Mandeb Strait
Richard Hudson’s three keys to holding the House, and why midterm conventions are here to stay
Illegal Alien Charged with Kidnapping 6-Year-Old Girl From Her Home and Sexually Assaulting Her
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
