The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump seeks to wipe away entire New York civil fraud judgement
Acting AG Todd Blanche Says DOJ Has Over 8,000 Fraud Cases Underway, And It’s the Tip of the Iceberg
Missouri Incumbents Voted Out a Week After Ignoring Public Pressure on Data Center
Dem senator ripped for ‘smear’ of female activist advocating for Swalwell’s accusers: ‘Very bad look’
Hero High School Principal Takes a Bullet to Stop School Shooter
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into Cassidy Hutchinson, Democrats’ Star Jan. 6 Witness: Report
Top school district slapped with complaint alleging ‘elaborate system’ to keep kids’ gender transitions secret
Fox News Poll: Record number say taxes are too high; government spending seen as wasteful
WATCH: Leavitt slaps down critics who called Trump’s Iran threat a bluff
Suspect accused of killing Iryna Zarutska ‘incapable to proceed’ on his charge
Video: ‘In the Name of Allah’ – Man with Knife Arrested in Ohio for Threatening to Kill Father, Then Chasing His Unsuspecting Daughter
Charlotte light-rail murder suspect ruled incompetent to stand trial as history of crazed claims trails case
Top GOP hawk Graham warns Iran deal has ‘troubling aspects’ as ceasefire begins
JD Vance’s Task Force Uncovers $6 Billion in Potential Fraud, Begins Taking Action: Report
Trump admin scores Minnesota court win in Medicaid fraud crackdown
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
