The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Breaking: Trump Reinstates Naval Blockade on Iran in Strait of Hormuz as Attacks Ramp Up
Trump makes surprise pick to fill Graham’s Senate seat
Mick Jagger Says Musicians and Athletes Should Entertain Fans, Not ‘Lecture’ Them About Politics
WV town’s police department thrown into chaos by evidence room fiasco, but officials say no one was fired
Lindsey Graham left behind modest wealth despite decades in Washington’s elite circles
Charlie Kirk’s close friend calls for death penalty for convicted assassins
Sick Man-Child: Tim Walz Bringing National Guard Back from DC After Rubio Deports Child Rapist Walz Pardoned
More Arson? Investigators Sift Through Ashes at Landmark 173-Year-Old Church Searching for Clues
Conservative groups say Justice Kagan cannot be impartial in upcoming Supreme Court climate litigation
Michigan Dem senator throws support behind candidate to replace him in contentious primary
California Eco-Tyranny Destroyed By New EPA Rule
Americans Bombard Paris Official with Memes After He Blames Them for European Heat Wave
Naked man tries to kidnap 7-year-old tourist from mother at Portland park, bystanders intervene
At least 27 dead in Bangkok after fire breaks out at bar: Officials
Two teen suspects held after 5 family members killed in ‘targeted mass shooting’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
