The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Massachusetts lawmakers pass bill to scrap ‘offensive language’ from state’s General Laws
Navy sailor admits killing fellow service member as mother questions missed warning signs
Gwyneth Paltrow’s ‘Centrist’ Politics Reveal How Far the Left Has Moved: ‘My Husband Thinks I’m a Republican’
DHS approves plan to verify voter citizenship, monitor mail ballots as Trump push intensifies
DOJ Vows Action After California Blocks Federal Audit of Voter Rolls: ‘What Are They Afraid Of?’
Supreme Court Slaps Down Lower Court Ruling That Backed Biden Admin’s War on Natural Gas Appliances
New Jersey Democrats advance bill criminalizing interference with abortion, transgender healthcare
Liberals File Lawsuit to Stop White House UFC Event Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday
Los Angeles mayoral primary results: Spencer Pratt upstart campaign falls short
Platner floats jailing billionaires in fiery pre-primary speech pushing far-left agenda
LA mayoral race heads to November runoff as Karen Bass faces Mamdani-style socialist
Church cans patriotic staple on Biden’s posh vacation enclave — pastor says tradition ‘doesn’t cut it’
Platner’s ‘living on the sea’ claim dismantled by critics as financial docs paint a different picture
Trump-pardoned MPD officers sue US over fatal pursuit prosecution
Voter fraud or a ‘red mirage’? Why Spencer Pratt’s fate and the LA mayoral results are so complicated
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
