The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Congress is vulnerable to a paralyzing terrorist attack
‘Unprecedented’: Judges reveal behind-the-scenes coordination on Trump immigration cases
Apple TV’s thriller ‘Last Seen’ is worth seeing
Barry Melrose, 1956-2026
Minnesota woman’s mugshot goes viral after social media users spot resemblance to Jennifer Lopez
Breaking: Holdout Juror in Lindsay Clancy Trial Issues First Statement: ‘I Didn’t Have Any Doubts’
Juror who blocked Lindsay Clancy verdict disputes fellow jurors’ claims: report
Incumbent GOP Rep Attacks Trump for Enforcing Immigration Law in ‘Stunning’ Campaign Ad
Watch: Dem Candidate Cries Uncontrollably, Prays in Squad Car After Drunk Driving Arrest
HOA Forecloses on Sick Homeowner Over $977 Debt, Then Buys His $450k Home for $8,000
ICE deports ex-Liberian fighter accused of torture, recruiting child soldiers
Alert: Undeniable Boasberg Communist Connections Finally Surface – Hosted Communist Propaganda Org’s Events 9 Times, 6 as FISA Judge
Trump’s EPA reforms are a huge boost to manufacturers, but there’s more red tape to cut: expert
Oregon Mom Gets Last Laugh After State Blocked Her from Adopting a Foster Child Due to Her Christian Beliefs
Mike Huckabee calls out Macklemore on antisemitism: ‘Voice’ of ‘Jew hatred’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
