The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Survey work begins at proposed site of Trump’s Triumphal Arch in DC
Liberal arts college drops prof’s name from campus hall after grave dig controversy
Suspected roadway gunman with reported criminal history sparks outrage after drivers shot
Stacey Abrams hit with subpoena in alleged campaign finance violations saga: ‘No one is above the law’
‘I’m not some hooker’: GOP senators release Hunter Biden texts buried by DOJ
Members of Congress using online prediction markets? Don’t bet on it
Breaking: UAE Has Been Secretly Striking Iran, Fighting Alongside US and Israel
John Cornyn under fire from MAGA base over anti-Trump post
San Antonio Spurs Superstar Ejected After Vicious Hit – Should the NBA Suspend Him?
Trump ‘seriously considering’ plan to make Venezuela and its $40 trillion in oil permanent part of USA
Watch: Military Veteran Scores the Biggest Payday in ‘Price Is Right’ History
Mega-mansion built on Manson murder site now a luxury rental after years of failing to find buyer
Unions’ ‘Astonishing’ Attack Ad Against LA Republican Spencer Pratt Actually Helps His Case
Josh Shapiro and AOC Are Waging War Over a Midterm Congressional Race with 2028 Implications: Report
Trump Says He’s ‘Seriously Considering’ Adding a 51st State
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
