The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Republican who reportedly dropped out defeats Trump’s pick in key swing-district primary
Republicans move to oust embattled Florida GOP lawmaker in bitter primary fight
Musk Issues Stark Counter-Threat After Mamdani Team Member Declared Him ‘Valid Military Target’ According to Report
House Republican Ends Re-Election Campaign After Ethics Committee Recommends Censure
Details on Heavily Armed Person Roaming Golf Course Before Trump Visit Emerge, Notebook Seized
Disturbing: Gossip Columnist Perez Hilton Hospitalized After Harming Self on TikTok Live Stream
Takeaways from crucial primary elections across the country and more top headlines
Suspects in deadly Connecticut home invasion arrested in attack that rocked beach town
GOP governor endorses candidate challenging Trump-backed congressman in Republican US House primary
WATCH: Smithsonian director admits she sees history as ‘tool’ of ‘social justice’ in resurfaced 2025 clip
Marine veteran Las Vegas officer killed in shooting; armed suspect also dead
Democrats’ bitter civil war hits Michigan, but biggest prize still up for grabs
Trump warns Iran will be hit ‘really hard’ if nuclear negotiations collapse again
Socialist tenant organizer who blasted ‘sell-out Democrats’ loses Midwest primary
Dems rally behind Michigan prosecutor to champion party in crucial House race
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
