The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
DHS torches ‘bamboozled’ Dems for calling ICE crackdown ‘vicious lies’
Trump can’t resist Biden autopen dig as he declares last year’s Thanksgiving turkey pardons invalid
Hegseth rips Mark Kelly’s post about his service: ‘You can’t even display your uniform correctly’
Mark Kelly and Democrats turn ‘seditious six’ accusations into fundraising boon
Democratic Senator Appears to Threaten Military Amid Mark Kelly Investigation: ‘There Will Be Consequences’
War on badges: House GOP targets anti-police rhetoric amid ICE attacks
Former House Speaker McCarthy warns Marjorie Taylor Greene is ‘the canary in the coal mine’
Watch: Just As Ilhan Omar Says Somalis Help America ‘Thrive,’ DOJ Adds 78th Suspect to $250 Million Tax Dollar Somali Money Laundering Investigation
Students find more violent imagery near University of Wisconsin campus after anti-ICE displays probed
Accidental Confession: Dem in Video Commanding Troops to Disobey Orders Just Confirmed She Knows She Committed Sedition
Unreal Video: Woke TN Candidate for Congress Was Literally Thrown Out of Gov.’s Office After Trying Mad Dash Past Security in 2019
Charlotte GOP chair says mayor creates perception that ‘does not match the reality’ amid violent crime wave
Comey expects further legal scrutiny from Trump admin, criticizes ‘fools who would frighten us’
Dems move to set limits on Trump’s donor-funded White House ballroom, claiming ‘bribery in plain sight’
How millions of illegal immigrants got jobs in the US
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
