News • Opinons • Politics

Supreme Court To Decide Whether Trump Administration Can End DACA Program

The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.

The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.

Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.


DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.

The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.


AG Todd Blanche Now Among Trump Officials Living on Military Base for Safety: Report
AG Todd Blanche Now Among Trump Officials Living on Military Base for Safety: Report
It Wouldn’t Be a ‘Climate Change’ Conference Without Tons of Private Jets There, and the UN’s COP31 Certainly Delivered
It Wouldn’t Be a ‘Climate Change’ Conference Without Tons of Private Jets There, and the UN’s COP31 Certainly Delivered
Texas Democrats put DEI back on agenda after sweeping to power
Texas Democrats put DEI back on agenda after sweeping to power
Suspect ‘barricaded’ after multiple injured in shooting near DC fitness center, police say
One killed, four injured in Logan Circle shooting before gunman barricades himself in apartment and turns gun on himself
Dem rep blames ‘horrific’ traffic for missing Hegseth impeachment vote: ‘I am so sorry’
Dem rep blames ‘horrific’ traffic for missing Hegseth impeachment vote: ‘I am so sorry’
Who is Scott Colom, and how did his viral ads help secure Mississippi Senate stunner?
Trump threatens to double tariffs on Mexico if migrant caravans not stopped
Peltola campaign loses in court on rejected absentee ballots as she maintains narrow lead
Jim Jordan predicts who Dems will quickly go after in Trump admin once they take power and more top headlines
‘China is not our enemy’: Inside the DSA’s foreign travel now in Florida’s crosshairs
See also  Prosecutor overseeing Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ investigation resigns

The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.

DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.

The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.

The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter


Discover more from ConservativeModern.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading