The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Mamdani says Trump agrees to grant visa so mother can attend funeral of teen killed in Bronx shooting
Collins accuses Schumer of pushing attack ads filled with ‘outright lies’ in tight Maine race
Missing Utah teen Kylie Arellano found safe in Oregon after 500-day search
Michigan Democrats in disarray after Haley Stevens endorses Mike Rogers and gets kicked out of party
Chicago Assailants Picked the Victim, Quickly Discovered He Had a Concealed Carry Permit
Dems Forgot to Price The Loss When It Comes to Green Energy Grid: And Now We’re All Paying for It
Rogue AI Accessed Public Voter Info in Key Swing State Without Authorization
DOJ set to appeal ruling in Alaska Senate race dispute over ‘Decoy Dan’
Young Democrats Go After Maxine Waters: Then They Completely Regret It
AI Now Predicts Your Age And If You’ll Survive Cancer – All it Takes Is a Face Scan
Trump Admin Handing Out Massive Payouts to ‘Expose Fraud’ – Nick Shirley Already Received the First One
Savannah Guthrie makes heartbreaking plea in mom’s disappearance after finding old drawing
Chief of staff to Haley Stevens resigns after Mike Rogers endorsement
American Defense Innovator Takes the Fight to Beijing’s Electronic Dominance with Ambitious Made-in-America Military Computer
American Defense Innovator Takes the Fight to Beijing’s Electronic Dominance with Ambitious Made-in-America Military Computer
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
