The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
It never ends: GOP moves to fund border, Democrats blast Trump spending
Video: Ex-Trans Speaker Postpones TPUSA Speech as Antifa ‘Militia … on Cross-Sex Hormones’ Threatens Violence Cops Weren’t Prepared for
Vance turns up heat on states with federal cash threat over Medicaid fraud crackdown
JD Vance’s Fraud Task Force Makes California Pay $1.3 Billion Price for Defrauding Taxpayers
Children’s book author sentenced for husband’s poisoning death as judge calls her ‘too dangerous’
Arrest of gang member convicted of murder puts Dem state’s sanctuary policies on blast
Red-State Governor Cancels Special Redistricting Session for Congressional Seats
DHS says two women killed six years apart in Texas should still be alive after illegal immigrant’s arrest
Lawmakers clash over Trump gas tax holiday as Iran war drives prices higher
DHS lawyer focuses blame on Biden judge after illegal immigrant release controversy
Texas Sues Netflix for Allegedly ‘Spying’ on Residents, Including Children
Warsh confirmed as next Fed chairman and will face renewed inflation threat
Age of first-time mothers hits record high in blue states as birth rates keep falling
WATCH: Dem’s Plan to Tar Patel as Alcoholic Backfires When Patel Reminds Crowd of Dem’s Own Alcohol Disgrace … and Brings Receipts
Report: After Sex Scandal Was Exposed, Swalwell Attempted to ‘Intimidate’ Women He Shared Messages with
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
