The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory
Louisiana Democrats pick rural farmer to challenge GOP in uphill Senate bid
Ketanji Brown Jackson Really Worried Judges Might Actually Apply Second Amendment In Gun Cases
Taxpayer Dollars May Have Funded Education Of CCP Assets, Report Reveals
Red States Unite Against California Over It’s Alleged Plot To Impose Green Agenda On Nation
New York Might Make Mamdani’s City-Owned Grocery Stores Permanent
NY AG hopeful blasts Letitia James as Medicaid fraud recoveries collapse: ‘She’s not doing the job’
Trump nominates Oklahoma law enforcement veteran Lance Schroyer to lead ICE as permanent director
Two 14-year-olds flee MTA officers, remain missing after vanishing from New Jersey train station
Judge rules Dan Sullivan can appear on Alaska primary ballot against Sen. Dan Sullivan
Jeffries welcomes Democratic Socialists into the fold as critics warn party is revealing ‘exactly who it is’
Polygamous sect leader convicted of abuse charges after girls found in trailer on Arizona highway
Hezbollah rejects Israel and Lebanon’s peace framework: ‘Null and void’
Trump unloads on ‘lunatic’ John Bolton after ex-aide pleads guilty in classified docs case
Man who set Virginia council member on fire over alleged affair gets 40-year sentence
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
