The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Fetterman Defends Trump Foreign Policy Wins as Fellow Democrats Throw a Fit: ‘Removing Maduro Was Positive’
3 Days After Maduro’s Capture, And Trump Has Inked Multi-Billion-Dollar Oil Deal to Be Used to Benefit the Venezuelan and American People
Trump pulls US out of UN-linked migration forum in bold immigration move
Rubio outlines three-step plan about what comes next for Venezuelan government
Rubio lays out three-phase plan for Venezuela after Maduro: ‘Not just winging it’
‘Hands off Venezuela’ demonstrations kick off worldwide
House report suggests activist groups did not help fire relief efforts. They say otherwise
Mark Kelly Gives CNN Rambling Response When Asked If Troops Who Captured Maduro Should Have Disobeyed Their Orders
Marco Rubio Tells Lawmakers Trump’s Plan for Acquiring Greenland: Report
White House says Venezuela’s future ‘dictated’ by US as Trump embraces ‘American dominance’
Florida boater accused of killing teen in crash avoids jail time with plea deal
Slain Ohio dentist’s brother-in-law says ‘domestic dispute’ 911 call came from party guest, not wife
Watchdog urges DOJ probe of top research university over alleged illegal DEI practices: ‘Defies common sense’
Trump says US will always support NATO despite plans to invade or buy Greenland
DOJ sends prosecutors to Minnesota amid widening fraud investigation
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
