The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump-endorsed candidate will face top GOP target in Nevada House district
Gaming-world veteran who ripped ‘woke’ culture scores Trump-backed battleground primary win
BREAKING: Karmelo Anthony Prison Sentence Announced, Roughly 4 Hours After Guilty Verdict Read
Trump administration to offer ‘premium’ expedited visa interviews for $750
Billionare Tom Steyer ends California governor campaign after falling short in Jungle Primary
Nick Reiner, Charged with Murdering His Parents, Demands Access to $1.5 Million Inheritance
GOP Finally Defeat Democrats, Pass Bill to Fund ICE, Border Patrol for Years to Come
The Left Has the Most Predictable Reaction to Knicks Losing NBA Finals Game in NYC: It’s Trump’s Fault!
Trump-backed Hilton advances to California governor general election
WATCH: As Fraud Accusations Swirl, Nick Shirley Confronts ‘126 Year-Old’ Who Voted in 51 Elections, According to California Sec. of State
Fetterman refuses to defend Platner, calls him ‘baggage’ as scandals mount
ALERT: Trump Launches Strikes After Iran Downed Apache, Fulfilling His Promise to Respond
Riots consume Belfast over attempted beheading by Sudanese immigrant
LISTEN: Brian Hooker’s own words appear to place him in the water the night missing wife vanished in Bahamas
Cornyn won’t campaign for Paxton in Texas Senate race against Talarico
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
