The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Jet fuel spikes as airlines warn supplies could run dry within weeks
TSA Done for? Ex-Obama DHS Chief Says Shutdown Woes Could ‘Break the Back’ of TSA
Sen Mazie Hirono trolled for admitting Trump not ‘a king,’ and ‘never has been’
Trump-Deranged James Carville Claims President Not ‘Tough Enough’ to Finish Term
Executed killer’s chilling claim about what she felt during pickax murders still haunts retired FBI agent
Paxton dominates CPAC as GOP frets over Texas Senate runoff
DHS shutdown putting Americans at risk as World Cup security prep ‘significantly behind’: Sen Fetterman
African nation calls for Ilhan Omar to be extradited after Vance’s fraud claim
Australian Police Identify Suspect in Deadly Case of Koala Tied to Car and Dragged Down Street
’90 Day Fiance’ alum’s boyfriend beats Boca Bash attempted murder case he rips as ‘ridiculous’
Paul Ehrlich’s ‘Population Bomb’ Failure Shows the Dangers of Scientific Alarmism
Ukraine views Iran war as an extension of its war against Russia, even if Trump doesn’t
Cruz refuses to take sides between Cornyn, Paxton in high-stakes GOP Senate clash
Slain college student’s mother vows ‘fight for justice’ after illegal immigrant charged in Chicago killing
What? Toronto’s Foreign-Born Mayor Warns ICE to Stay Out of City – Where It Has No Authority
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
