The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Nevada judge retires after court grants protective order to attorney she was accused of stalking
Trump says US should have tested NATO by invoking Article 5 over border security
Top 5 moments from Jack Smith’s testimony on Capitol Hill
Trump snubs Canada by withdrawing country’s invite to join ‘most prestigious Board of Leaders ever’
Newly minted Virginia AG who fantasized about opponent’s family dying roasted over glaring typo
Video captures Detroit student allegedly wielding box cutter in classroom chase as teacher intervenes
Inside ‘MELANIA’: The unprecedented access behind Melania Trump’s first film
Armed carjacker’s wild Corvette rampage turns downtown into war zone; sergeant wounded in deadly shootout
Trump calls for investigation into Ilhan Omar’s wealth, says it should start ‘NOW’
Former Des Moines schools chief pleads guilty to falsely claiming US citizenship and gun charge
‘Abhorrent’: 76 Republicans Vote to Keep Carveouts for Child Sex Change Groups in Spending Package
Key takeaways from Jack Smith’s House Judiciary testimony
FBI Arrests Leftist Who Dared Pam Bondi to ‘Come and Get Me’ After Storming Minnesota Church
Republicans narrowly reject efforts to handcuff Trump’s war powers in Venezuela
Klobuchar files for Minnesota governor run after Walz abandons reelection bid
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
