The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump says ‘America needs God’ in Good Friday message touting ‘resurgence of religion’
Watch: DEI-Obsessed Sky News Reporter Claims Moon Landings by ‘All White Men’ Didn’t Represent Humanity
Pro-Lifers Shred Trump Admin’s Biden-Era Title X Extension as ‘Inexplicable Slap in the Face’
Trump Admin Declares War on Microplastics in Drinking Water
Trump Executive Order Aims to Save College Sports, Limit Athlete Transfers
Artemis II astronauts nearly halfway to the moon; NASA shares stunning photos from Orion spacecraft
California 4-year-old boy survives attack by coyote that bit and tried to drag him away
Trump requests over $10 billion for DC infrastructure and National Guard deployment
Colorado lawyers say court e-file system now makes them certify they won’t assist ICE
Patel, McCormick warn foreign terror threats inside US grew during Biden years
Trump gives rare praise to persistent GOP foe after White House ballroom vote
Illegal immigrant accused of murdering wife in Texas just weeks after marriage, ICE fights release
Nebraska Senate candidate restructures campaign after complaint over payments to family: report
Legendary Fleetwood Mac Guitarist Lindsey Buckingham Attacked with ‘Unknown Substance’ in California
‘It’d Be Better Not to Talk About it at All’: Mamdani’s Good Friday Message Draws Backlash from Christians
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
