The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
‘Tip of the iceberg’: NJ illegal voting scandal explodes with more key systems at risk
Coercion Is the Abortion Debate We Aren’t Having
No Jews on Mamdani’s ‘truly representative’ NYC judiciary panel, sparking backlash
Kentucky governor calls on McConnell to prove he is fit to serve or resign: ‘Address the people’
Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband details pill use as expert says evidence could shape murder trial
BTK killer Dennis Rader’s daughter Kerri Rawson hit with domestic violence injunction: report
Murdered 9-year-old begged not to go on trip with dad months before he allegedly killed her, mom testifies
Thune soft-pedals adding Trump’s request for debt limit curveball to GOP budget bill
Breaking: Iran Launches Missiles at US Base in Surprise Attack – US Forces Downed Every Single One
New Maine law limits police cooperation with federal immigration officials
GOP governor survives challenge from Bitcoin evangelist in gubernatorial runoff
A 16-Year-Old Lifeguard’s ‘Heroic’ Rescue Earns Him a Trip to the White House After Trump Sees Footage
Daughter of late House Dem forced into runoff after falling short in special election
Mamdani Slammed for ‘Reckless and Foolish’ Doxxing of Thousands of Wealthy New Yorkers
Charlie Kirk murder case as ‘straight-forward’ as it gets, prosecutors argue as case nears trial decision
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
