The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Why the NFL doesn’t care about Bad Bunny MAGA backlash
Hagerty urges FCC to punish Verizon over release of Senate phone data
Turning Point issues major endorsement in critical Senate race as Trump hints at weighing in
Breaking: GOP Rep. Alleges Bad Bunny’s Halftime Show Was ‘Illegal,’ Moves for ‘Dramatic’ FCC Action Against NFL and NBC
Maryland high school locked down after shooting leaves one person injured
Docs Reveal Vile Things Leftists Said to Children During Cities Church Riot
California jewelry store burglar breaks in from roof, owner threatens to leave Los Angeles
Republicans Introduce OMAR Act to Deal With Corruption in Congress
The cost of this grocery staple is nearing record highs — and Americans can’t get enough
Judge says Abrego Garcia Supreme Court ruling may shape Venezuelan deportation case
Florida Poaches Yet Another Juggernaut California Business as Economic Red Shift Continues
Jasmine Crockett’s vulgar 6-word message for Trump in Epstein probe
Senate Republicans find their secret weapon as they try to navigate midterm ‘headwinds’ with Palm Beach getaway
Watch: Patriots Player Helps Take Down Field Invader in Moment Not Seen During Broadcast
Ghislaine Maxwell pleads Fifth Amendment, dodges questions in House Oversight Epstein probe
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
