The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump Announces Plan to Help DHS Workers in Spite of ‘Radical Left’ Shutdown
Report: The Last Straw That Led to Trump Firing Pam Bondi Had to Do with Eric Swalwell
ActBlue’s lawyers said it may have misled Congress on foreign donations: Report
Army chief of staff ordered to retire immediately as Hegseth continues Pentagon shakeup
Watch: Trump Declares that Because of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection, ‘Not One Thing Can Separate Humanity from the Power of God’s Everlasting Love’
Trump supporter allegedly killed by ex-coworker who expressed ‘animosity’ over political beliefs: complaint
GOP rails against ‘s— sandwich’ deal as all eyes turn to House to end DHS shutdown
Girl Who Went Missing in 1994 Found Alive
Man accused of killing parents with hammer, knife, then calling 911 to confess: report
Harris ripped over video previewing Trump speech she claims she wouldn’t watch: ‘Sit this one out’
Utter Humiliation: Watch Dem Rep Ask 100 People at Black Church to Raise a Hand if They Don’t Have ID – What Happens Next Is Priceless
Jasmine Crockett Attempts to Defend Ketanji Brown Jackson by Playing the Race Card, Accidentally Proves Conservatives’ Point
California hit with fresh setback in failed gender secrecy case costing taxpayers millions
UK hosts summit on reopening Strait of Hormuz following Trump demand: ‘Take care of it’
Pam Bondi already fired as attorney general, Cabinet official teed up as replacement: sources
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
