The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
House punts Trump spy powers extension after conservatives block deal, forcing end-of-month showdown
Trump admin announces expansion of visa restriction policy in Western Hemisphere
Singer D4vd arrested and held without bail in case tied to teen found dead in Tesla: Police
EXCLUSIVE: NYC officials refuse ICE hold for illegal alien accused in arson that killed 4 and injured 7: DHS
Jerome Powell Now Considering Move to Spite Trump: Report
Franklin Graham defends Trump in letter shared on Truth Social after AI ‘Jesus’ image backlash
Iranian Economy on the Brink: US Blockade Leaves Country with Weeks of Oil Production Left
Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons submits resignation letter to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin
Bernie Sanders, AOC-backed Democrat wins key House race; GOP fails to expand fragile majority
Democrats turn on Spanberger over plummeting popularity amid redistricting battle
Coffee Shop Chain That Originated in San Francisco Defends Plan to Remove ‘Pride’ Flags from Stores’ Decor
Tennessee governor signs nuclear family month resolution as critics push back on exclusions
Owner of Antique Store That Trans Mob Attacked and Shut Down Over ‘Intolerance’ Has Been Murdered, Leaving Behind Wife, Daughter, and Unborn Child
If You’ve Ever Thought Life Is Too Painful to Be Worth Living, This Piece Might Just Change Everything
Shouting match erupts between RFK Jr and Dem lawmaker over his comments about Black children
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
