The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Multiple people wounded in mass shooting at Seattle Center, police say
Newborn vanished after secret birth, parents allegedly claimed baby ‘was a prank’: cops
NY circus performer airlifted to hospital after colleague’s arrow misses target, strikes his neck
Nevada man dies at famed Sequoia National Park trail after sudden emergency
Inside Fauci’s private diary: What he wrote about Trump, TV personalities and celebrities
ICE prepares major operation targeting Haitians losing TPS after Supreme Court ruling
One dead, 6 injured after gunfire erupts at unsanctioned California party that drew hundreds: sheriff
Jeffries pivots to Trump and GOP when asked about noncitizens on New Jersey voter rolls
Melania Makes Next Move After Judge Tosses Out Anti-Trump Author’s Lawsuit Against Her
This red state is strengthening its grip as America’s next economic heavyweight
Mickey Mouse Massacre: Disney Has Third Round of Layoffs, Hitting ESPN, Pixar, More
Everyday Revolutionary War heroes take center stage in Trump’s ‘Spirit of ’76’ exhibit
Watch: Red Skelton’s Legendary Pledge of Allegiance Performance for Kids Resurfaces After Another Dem Lawmaker Disrespects the Pledge
Drinking Coffee Is Actually Good For Your Heart, But There’s A Catch
Fauci’s newly released COVID diaries reveal bizarre fixation on fame as pandemic deaths mounted
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
