The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
President Trump Invokes Jesus While Pushing Senate to Pass the SAVE America Act
Oklahoma Governor Names Energy Executive to Fill DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s Senate Seat
Angel mom, GOP blame Spanberger after illegal immigrant with 30 arrests charged in killing
Senate confirms DOJ fraud chief as Minnesota daycare scandal draws national scrutiny
BREAKING: Pentagon Reportedly Preparing to Send 3,000 Airborne Troops to Middle East
Op-Ed: Democrats Are Fighting for Ballot Baloney
Aid ships dock in Cuba as country faces economic and energy crisis
NTSB flags ‘conflicting information’ in LaGuardia tower, unclear who handled ground-control duties
Man accused of timed beatings now charged with murder after woman found dead in river: report
Gavin Newsom avoids calling himself a Zionist
Trump energy czar says Iran conflict gas spike is ‘temporary blip’ as drilling push ramps up
TSA callouts hit Houston, Atlanta, New Orleans hardest, 450 officers have quit nationwide
Chicago Democrat Suggests Woman Murdered by Illegal ‘Startled’ Her Killer, Shares Blame
Massive Explosion Rocks Texas Refinery, Triggers Shelter-in-Place
USC pulls plug on California gubernatorial debate after candidate race controversy
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
