The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Revamped Reflecting Pool Damaged by ‘Radical Left Lunatics,’ Trump Says
Texas Surges Past California in Key Sign of Business Influence
Trump says Meloni ‘wants to be friends again’ after Italy refused to help US amid Iran war
Vance says ‘United States wins either way’ as he defends Trump’s Iran deal against GOP skeptics
Top GOP group pumps $37M into fight on key issue dominating midterm races: ‘Much more to come’
Talarico says the divide is ‘top vs. bottom’ — then heads to one of America’s richest donor enclaves
Texas woman faked pregnancy for months before killing friend, abducting her unborn baby
South Carolina fitness trainer told friends she wanted to leave her now-husband years before body was found
Rubio gives Iran deal the silent treatment
How Brendan Carr’s attack on TV stations echoes FCC chairman under JFK
The wish to be like Wolfgang: Review of ‘Amadeus’
Minnesota AG Ellison lashes out when grilled on fraud scandal: ‘I’m done talking to you’
WATCH: Tuberville backs Trump’s Iran deal as Democrat blasts ‘surrender’
Israel ‘remains firmly committed’ to ceasefire but will continue occupation of southern Lebanon
News Outlet Caves to Democratic Senate Candidate, Kills Poll That Makes Her Look Bad
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
