The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Lindsay Clancy juror who backed the defense also publicly cheered Karen Read’s acquittal
Florida woman accused of DUI crashes SUV into parked car, then makes bizarre plea to police caught on camera
Trump Signs Orders to Block Certain Canadian Products from Being Sold in the U.S.
Anthropic Researchers Say AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’ Within Next Decade
Emergency slide sparks questions on Trump’s new Air Force One before president reveals why
‘Alien harboring’ accusations fly as DC-area county spends taxpayer funds to blunt ICE
Report: Jimmy Kimmel’s Current Season Will Be His Last at ABC
Merz accuses AfD of ‘ethnic cleansing’ agenda, postpones call with Trump after president praises party
We Must Stop China’s ‘Surveillance Machines’ from Flooding the US Car Market at All Cost
Proposal would pay homeowners ‘data center dividends’ to counter growing backlash
Fmr Biden ambassador blames Trump for Canada playing ‘footsie’ with China
Accused wife killer Barry Morphew back behind bars after separate incident that skyrocketed bond: prosecutors
Amazon cargo jet pilot reportedly told wife, ‘My career is over’ shortly after deadly crash
Watch: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Accidentally Admit They Made Their Decision Based on the Wrong Criteria
Art Garfunkel Says He’s Contemplating Leaving America Because of Trump
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
