News Opinons Politics

Supreme Court To Decide Whether Trump Administration Can End DACA Program

The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.

The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.

Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.


DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.

The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.


Platner campaign rocked with damning allegations from another ex-lover as Senate race heats up: report
Catholic bishops consecrate US, White House says Trump and Melania ‘join in prayer’ in ‘unprecedented’ gesture
Ilhan Omar Lashes Out at ‘Horrific’ Jerry Seinfeld When He Said Palestine ‘Doesn’t Exist’ After Knicks Game
Karmelo Anthony’s Father Blames ‘White Attorney’ for His Son’s Murder Conviction
Pima County sheriff says Mexican authorities have not made contact over Nancy Guthrie search tip
That Time Leslie Stahl Claimed Hunter’s Laptop Couldn’t Be ‘Verified’ as ’60 Minutes’ Finally Confronts Its Bias
Trump plans to deport Iranians to violence-plagued central African nation in new deal
Trump Admin Shuts Down Mamdani’s Attempt to Meet with Foreign Leader
Police: Father of Seven Killed on NYC Bus After Confronting Rider Over Loud Phone Conversation
FIRST ON FOX: DOJ sues Spanberger’s Virginia over laws kneecapping federal agents as mask war escalates
New Poll: Majority of Americans Want Every Illegal Immigrant Deported
Bill Cassidy goes out in style
Rubio gets somber at UFC event, says world is so polarized there are few things that ‘bring people together’
Mississippi teen allegedly killed elderly couple in their home before firing on deputies in standoff
Convicted killer Karmelo Anthony claims he is ‘penniless’ in appeal despite major donor-funded legal campaign
See also  Spencer Pratt falls behind Nithya Raman in LA mayoral race after latest vote update

The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.

DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.

The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.

The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter