The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump Keeps Gifting Officials and Friends a Particular Brand of Shoes
Watch: The 4 Most Intense Lines Hegseth Had About Iran During ’60 Minutes’ Interview
All eyes on Georgia as Trump-backed candidate battles in high-stakes congressional showdown
Convicted coconspirators spill insider intel on antifa at Texas terrorism trial
Oregon judge limits federal agents’ tear gas use at Portland ICE protests
Cornyn denies MAGA pressure forced support for talking filibuster on SAVE Act
Trump reveals top issues GOP should focus on to secure midterms victory: ‘I’ve never been more confident’
Trump calls SAVE America Act his ‘No. 1’ priority for House GOP
Obama Judge Gets Schooled by Appeals Court Following ‘Constitutionally Suspect’ Injunction Against DHS
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the ‘talking filibuster’ and the SAVE Act
FBI subpoenas Arizona county voting records related to notorious 2020 audit
Zuckerberg Sued: Meta’s AI Glasses Accused of Recording Intimate Moments, Sending Footage to Foreign Contractors
40+ House Republicans rally behind Markwayne Mullin for DHS, call it a ‘critical moment’ for border security
Storage facility raided as feds investigate alleged ISIS-inspired NYC bomb throwers
Judge disqualifies Trump-appointed leadership in New Jersey US attorney’s office
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
