The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Trump says Senate hearing on DNI nominee is cancelled until US attorney replacement confirmed
Trump DNI pick braces for Senate grilling as temporary stand-in fuels Dem pressure
5 chilling details from the alleged White House attack plot tied to UFC event
Canadian tourism to US begins to rebound after 51st state, tariffs debacle
Netanyahu’s relationship with Trump becomes baggage in reelection campaign
Trump wins two, loses one: Georgia billionaire delivers rare blow to endorsement machine
Texas plane crash leaves one dead, more injured after business jet catches fire on highway
GOP Gov DeWine urges Ohio to abolish the death penalty, says it is no longer a deterrent
Dems pick potential successor to DC’s congressional delegate after decades-long incumbency
State of play: What to know about potential socialist showdown between Trump and DC mayor as votes pour in
DC Guard shooting suspect stares down death penalty in first court appearance
Trump’s endorsement fails to save MAGA candidate as billionaire advances in key governor race
FDNY deploys 140+ personnel to JFK after Delta flight reported with flat tires on approach to landing
Look: World Cup Fans Visiting for the First Time Fall in Love with America, Go Viral on Blessings We Take for Granted
Trump-backed ‘McCongressman’ wins Oklahoma Senate primary, vows push for stalled SAVE Act
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
