The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
California mayor’s hot mic catches candid exchange after audience sends meeting off rails
Never Forget Dems Supported Large-Scale Deportations Until Trump Took Up the Issue – Just Listen to What Obama Said in 2014
Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman admits to sufficient facts in June drunken driving case
Rubio unveils visa restrictions targeting cybercrime networks
House Democrats Furious at Their Own Campaign Arm Over Expensive Primary Blunder
Ex-Dem Legislator Arrested Over Child Porn, But It’s 7 Words from FBI Investigator That Will Make You Sick to Your Stomach
Hunter Biden Blasts CNN’s Jake Tapper as a ‘Poor Journalist’ and a Terrible Person in NSFW Comments
Dem’s stunning ideal standard for immigration detention conditions resurfaces amid Texas senate bid
Lauren Boebert Says She Missed Key House Vote Because She Was Misinformed by GOP Staffers
More Than 19 Million Eggs Recalled Over Concerns of Dangerous Contamination
Secret Service agent on JD Vance’s detail investigated for allegedly leaking operational security info
Accused killer’s alleged disguises unravel as sheriff releases new clues in month-long manhunt
AP post on USAID cuts backfires as critics question taxpayer-funded Nepal transgender jobs
Foster child allegedly drowned in lake by two teens on local politician’s property: authorities
From the dugout to the White House: LA Dodgers celebrate World Series glory with Trump
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
