The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Illegal immigrant who stole DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s Gucci bag pleads guilty, faces deportation
Sanctuary politicians’ rhetoric led to 1,150% surge in violence against ICE agents: DHS
Deep Dive: Just What Are These ‘Illegal’ Orders Dems Want the Military to Disobey? Here They Are, And They’re Anything but Illegal
Bondi targets James Comey, Letitia James in legal battle: ‘hold…accountable for unlawful conduct’
DOJ renews fight for Epstein and Maxwell grand jury records
WNBA Star Admits That Elite 8th Graders Could ‘Probably’ Beat WNBA Players
DOJ files motion to unseal Epstein docs in latest step toward release
White House Delays Rollout of Healthcare Proposal After Getting Significant Backlash: Report
JD Vance Shreds Mitch McConnell Over ‘Ridiculous Attack on the President’s Team’
NYC suburb makes major security move by city border after Mamdani victory: ‘Talks like he’s pro-criminal’
Trump signs executive order targeting certain Muslim Brotherhood chapters as terrorist groups
Trump launches ‘Genesis Mission’ to supercharge US scientific AI innovation
Mamdani appoints top DSA leaders among more than 400 others to transition committees
‘Trump will probably come after me again’: Comey reacts to criminal case dismissal
Australian Senate Suspended After Right-Wing Leader Wears Burka in Protest
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
