The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes release follows Unabomber ‘precedent’ that cracked case, expert says
SEE IT: Dashcam shows Florida trooper chasing alleged street takeover suspect at 140 mph
Chris ‘Fredo’ Cuomo Tries Playing Tough Guy for Anthony Fauci, Gets Nuked By Social Media
WNBA Head Coach Protests Sophie Cunningham with ‘Trans Kids’ Shirt During Game
Trump can declare Iran victory now and withdraw troops, former counterterror official argues
Races to watch in Michigan as establishment Democrats face off against challenges on their left flank
Top Trump ally warns super PAC bankrolled by Dem billionaire is meddling in his GOP primary
Trump v. Smithsonian: A timeline of how the White House fight over ‘woke’ history unfolded
First showdown in race for Lindsey Graham’s Senate seat puts GOP hopefuls to the test
Todd Blanche moves closer to confirmation after rescinding $1.8B fund
Deadliest animal in every US state revealed, from moose and bears to dogs
Trailblazing former Republican Rep Kay Granger dies at 83: ‘Broke barriers’
Spencer Pratt reacts to Spokane devastation with blunt wildfire warning and message of faith
Off-duty trooper and armed citizen hailed as heroes after returning fire on In-N-Out gunman
Trump targets Biden-era billion-dollar Smithsonian budgets amid anti-‘woke’ push
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
