The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
DOJ sees exodus of staff after midterm losses
South Carolina’s new Democratic senator supports gun control on public health grounds
Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies are undermining Trump’s peace efforts, former top prosecutor alleges
New Jersey town reveals staggering $26M theft days after election, sparking backlash
Three teens, adult charged with murder after woman finds her teenage son dead in abandoned home
Two experienced skydivers die after midair collision entangles their parachutes
Betting Markets’ Midterm Predictions Were Dead On: Now They’re Saying DeSantis’s Odds of Becoming POTUS Are Skyrocketing
Chiefs Star Goes Bankrupt Mid-Season, Pawns Super Bowl Ring as Collateral
Housing Market Struggles May Signal Incoming Economic Crisis
Young Actress Reveals She Was Offered Cocaine at Hollywood Wrap Party at 11 Years Old
Ex-police officer accused of stabbing NYC jogger to death appears emotionless in new photos
Gun Rights Under Imminent Threat as Blue Wave Positions Dems to Revive Firearm Crackdown
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran decision: ‘Elected to do the hard things’
Melania Trump secures $7.2M for foster care scholarships at LSU ahead of Alabama showdown
DeSantis Slams Vivek Ramaswamy’s Disastrous Ohio Campaign: ‘How Bad Did They Beat Vivek? Like a Drum!’
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
