The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Breaking: NASA, Navy Personnel Rush to Recover Artemis II Astronauts After Pacific Ocean Landing
Sen Tim Sheehy makes emergency landing after in-flight engine failure
Pelosi, California Dems slam Swalwell over bombshell sexual assault allegations: ‘Indefensible’
Washington Post Journalist Pleads Guilty in Child Porn Case
Planned Parenthood Lost More Money Than It Made as Taxpayer Funding, Abortions Increased
Wes Moore preemptively unloads on Baltimore Sun ahead of expose, as spox beefs with ‘right wing’ ownership
Ex-staffer claims Swalwell sexually assaulted her. He denies allegations
On Nato, It’s Time to Take the Maverick from ‘Top Gun’ Approach: ‘Don’t Think, Just Do’
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Antifa-tied group’s plan for chaos, school probe over transgender policy
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Bahamas missing woman mystery, Athena Strand bodycam, Gilgo Beach guilty plea
Trump unveils new renderings for arch with ‘one nation under God’ inscription
Kamala Harris ‘might’ run for president in 2028, but black voters are skeptical of the idea
Kamala Harris Gives the Surest Sign Yet She’s Running in 2028 with Al Sharpton Event Speech
Teens suspected of murdering congressional intern linked by DNA on shell casings, prosecutors say
LATE BREAKING: Trump Issues Shockingly Graphic Post Targeting Haitian Illegal Accused of Murdering Mother of 2
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
