The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Cruise Ship Returns to Texas Port Shortly After Departure When Murder Victim Is Discovered On Board
Multiple Kennedy family members seek to join legal battle against Trump’s triumphal arch
10 Serial Killers Among Those Whose Sentences Were Commuted by Gavin Newsom
‘He blamed the Jews’: GOP congressman levels explosive accusation against JD Vance over election postmortem
Russia and Ukraine settle on large prisoner swap after no major developments from talks
Secretary Scott Bessent moved to military base over Iran threats and more top headlines
Slain New Jersey mom’s bedroom furniture removed by investigators months after unsolved stabbing
FIRST ON FOX: Supreme Court justices confront what it will take to keep America’s founding freedoms alive
Senate Republicans plan 54-day blitz to push Trump’s agenda before Democrats seize power
Did the blue wave leave Gavin Newsom behind?
South Yemeni leaders to US: Cut your losses in Yemen and support an independent south
UN denies working with Hamas-loving Gaza ‘aid’ group funded by American Marxist
NYC man accused of 3 Central Park rapes arrested at Miami Burger King
Multiple dead after vehicle crashes into food stand near North Hollywood Metro station
Mullin vows ‘zero change’ on immigration after Republicans suffer crushing midterm losses
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
