The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
BREAKING: University of Virginia Hit With Bomb Threat Triggering Evacuations
Sheriff warns Nancy Guthrie suspect could ‘absolutely’ strike again, hints at motive
Old Dominion University ROTC cadets disarm ISIS supporter shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ during shooting: officials
As NYC Considers a $30 Minimum Wage, Business Owners Are Warning About the Consequences
Michigan Synagogue Attack Suspect Identified as Lebanese Immigrant with an Axe to Grind
Hollywood Publication Variety Trashes Stephen Colbert’s Never-Ending, Anti-Trump Farewell Tour: ‘Not Very Good TV’
New Iranian supreme leader ‘likely disfigured,’ Hegseth says
Iran conflict could be push GOP needs for 2nd ‘big, beautiful bill’
GOP senator earns Dem backlash for ‘enemy is inside the gates’ comment about NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani
Two shootings intensify DHS standoff as GOP warns of rising terror threats
The president brands his own healthcare reform
Supreme Court’s tariffs nix scrambles Michigan campaigns
Why I’m not ‘Panican’ over oil markets
Karoline Leavitt Unleashes on ‘Reckless’ and ‘Completely False’ ABC News Report
UFC Legend Breaks His Silence After Getting Out of Prison for Defending His Young Child
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
