The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
‘The Office’ star blasts political ‘hypocrisy,’ explains why sitcom couldn’t be made today
Trump backs MAGA champion Mike Collins in Georgia’s Republican Senate runoff
Two suspects arrested after crashing through Camp Pendleton gate with 112 pounds of cocaine and fentanyl
UFC Weigh-in at Freedom 250: Photos
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Anti-Kirk teacher honored, ICE supporter expelled, Pride display problem
Judge defends barring cameras from Karmelo Anthony murder trial, says it was ‘an easy decision’
Florida man arrested for DUI after troopers allegedly find 34 open alcohol containers in vehicle
Armed Citizens Stop Supermarket Shooter In Missouri
New Declassified Docs Give Tulsi Gabbard The Last Laugh On Ukrainian Biolabs
Socialist Mayor Floats Taking Guns Away From Pimps Instead Of Just Arresting Them For Trafficking
Leading Democrat Senate Candidate’s Ex-Staffer Charged For Alleged Pro-Terrorist Vandalism
New Bill Would Fleece Pro-Lifers for ‘Emotionally Harming’ Abortion Doctors
As Medical Org Pushing Child Sex Changes Lucks Out In Court, A Bigger Legal Battle Brews
Obama Presidential Center’s $470M safety net under scrutiny as subcontractors say they’re owed millions
Trump picks James McDonald to lead powerful Southern District of New York after Jay Clayton’s departure
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
