The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Invasion of Texas: Dallas-Fort Worth Airport to Put Islamic Foot Wash Stations in Bathrooms
Watch: CNN Data Analyst Admits People Simply ‘Don’t Care’ About Left-Wing Climate Alarmism Anymore
Justice Department slams ‘politically motivated demands’ of DC Council asking govs to remove National Guard
Mamdani’s openness to campaigning with Hochul shows how far they’ve come
DOJ threatens California with lawsuit over ‘unbroken pattern’ of sexual abuse in women’s prisons
Trump admin marks 15 straight months with zero border releases as apprehensions plunge 94%
Slain NJ mom Brooke Hanlon’s family backs investigators two months after her stabbing death
Postpartum mom Lindsay Clancy on trial for murder brings court to a halt with sudden breakdown
Trump State Department Axes Biden-Era Initiative That Sought to Spread DEI Around the World
Why She Left: Details of Karoline Leavitt’s (Not So) Abrupt Departure and Just How Much Trump Adores Her
California Dem ripped for ‘perverted agenda’ ahead of fundraiser at risqué nightclub
GOP congressman’s ex-wife sues, alleging sensitive image of 2-year-old daughter was posted online
Extremism expert hailed as ‘terrific’ by ex-Biden official slapped with federal charges
Florida State University hit with federal civil rights investigation over race, sex-based scholarship programs
Dinesh D’Souza Shows the Truth of the Bible Through Biblical Archaeology
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
