The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Army soldiers from Minnesota, Michigan perish in separate Middle East incidents
Murdered Democratic lawmaker’s home broken into just days after fatal shooting
Chinese educator with several CCP ties cozies up to top New York Democrats: ‘Our old friend who listens’
‘We won’: Social media erupts over SCOTUS ruling dealing ‘fatal blow’ to transgender surgeries on minors
Hawley demands Biden release autopen consent records or face subpoena
Senate confirms Rodney Scott as Trump’s border agency head
Overnight break-in reported at the home of Minnesota lawmaker killed
Trump Chides Reporter Over Iran Question: ‘You Don’t Seriously Think I’m Going to Answer That?’
Meals Sold at Walmart and Kroger Recalled as Deadly Outbreak Is Investigated
State senator, Indian immigrant, pulls upset in Virginia Democratic lieutenant governor’s race
Migrant influx pushing Mass. shelter costs past $1B in FY25: report
Gov. Kathy Hochul Tells New Yorkers They’ll Be Paying Big Bucks to Illegal Aliens – Did She Just Throw Her Job Away?
Democratic split on US involvement in Iran spells more trouble for Schumer
New flyer shows suspected killer dad may have changed appearance in wilderness manhunt: police
White House Fires Back After ‘Disgraceful’ Jim Acosta Takes Sick Shot at Trump’s Deceased Ex-Wife
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
