The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
RNC chair says Talarico’s GOP crossover hopes are a ‘pipe dream’: ‘Nobody is going to follow him’
‘Outsider’ House primary winner sets sights on flipping longtime GOP seat back from Dems: ‘Ready for a change’
Massachusetts Governor Signs New Law Blocking ICE Access to Several Locations
DSA Governor Candidate Hires OnlyFans Model as Deputy Campaign Manager
Tennessee Candidate Arrested After Allegedly Shooting Down Flock Cameras
University of Michigan Goes Full Participation Trophy, Will Hide Grades for Student ‘Mental Health’
Florida man accused of killing nurse mom who helped him despite repeated arrests for threatening her: sheriff
Miss North Carolina USA pageant producers fire back after winner says she lost title over faith
WNBA Commissioner Announces League Is Reviewing Trans Inclusion After Former NBA Players Declare for Draft
Justice Department Settles With Pro-Life Father of 11 Whose Home They Busted Into
IN CHARTS: A visual breakdown of the Smithsonian’s billion-dollar taxpayer-funded budget
Socialists rising in Colorado? Send in the Marines, GOP nominee says
Why Stephen Miller thinks orders limiting birthright citizenship will go differently this time
EXCLUSIVE: Talarico caught on tape giggling about his church housing illegal immigrants set for deportation
Two dead, including infant, after boat capsizes in New York Harbor; 12 rescued
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
