The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Pearl Harbor remembrance ceremony marks 84 years since attack
Hamline University student brags on video that he celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination
Newsom team torched for image posted in response to mocking of gov’s ‘testicle-crushing’ sitting pose
Democrats escalate war-crime accusations as White House calls ‘innocent fisherman’ the new ‘Maryland Man’ hoax
First-Graders Leap Into Action and Save Their Teacher from Choking in Virginia Classroom
GOP Rep Goes Nuclear After Democrat Cuts Him Off Mid-Sentence: ‘You Were That Rude’
Widespread Obamacare Fraud: Phony SSNs Had a 100% Success Rate for Getting Coverage, Investigation Finds
How Is This Not Racist? Ex-MSNBC Host Trashes Minorities for Working with ICE to Catch Criminals
Florida teens in custody after 14-year-old girl found shot to death, burnt: sheriff
Alaska school district erases Veterans Day from official calendar: ‘Absolutely unacceptable’
Tom Homan Nukes Heckler Who Calls Him Traitor: ‘Grow A Backbone, Put a Kevlar Vest and a Gun on’
Public School Students Allowed to Skip Classes in Chicago if They ‘Fear’ ICE
Congress faces holiday crunch as health care fix collides with shrinking calendar
Republicans divided over whether to salvage Obamacare — or replace it — ahead of subsidy deadline
GOP stands firm in ‘blue slip’ battle with Trump despite prosecutor setbacks
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
