The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Replacement GOP nominee named after Rep Chuck Edwards drops re-election bid
US Marine veteran released from Russian prison after 1,666 days of detention
Michigan rescuers find family stranded for 3 days after tubing trip in dramatic video
Watch: Longtime Clinton Advisor Blasts Today’s Dems as Group of Lunatics, Who Are ‘Basically Illiterate and Uninformed’ from Watching MSNOW
NYC Homeowners Score Temporary Court Victory Over Mamdani’s New Tax
Alex Murdaugh lawyers allege ‘fabricated’ evidence was used to secure murder indictments
Trump-backed Darline Graham Nordone faces test in unpredictable South Carolina primary
Inside the Senate’s chaotic all-nighter that left Trump’s SAVE America Act on the shelf
Pentagon races to buy 10X more missiles as Iran war dwindles arsenal, threatens readiness for China aggression
GOP senators rally behind 9/11 families in push to ban Mamdani from anniversary ceremony: ‘He’s a disgrace’
The Medicare-for-all trade-offs socialists aren’t talking about, according to experts
One year later, some DC residents praise Trump’s National Guard deployment
Deported child predator who illegally reentered US sentenced to 20 years in federal prison
Florida woman accused of faking cancer to scam hundreds out of $40K, police say
Trump used catering truck, Air Force One decoy to evade Iran threat: report
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
