The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Video captures chaos erupting at NYC vigil for slain Ayatollah Khamenei as punches fly
Judge to allow sex offender to question witnesses in Virginia locker room case
California Rep. Darrell Issa to retire, endorses Jim Desmond to succeed him
Trump says US ‘doing very well’ in Iran nearly 1 week into joint action against Tehran
Biden says ‘I’m a h— of a lot smarter than most of you’ to crowd at Jesse Jackson’s funeral
NYC Reportedly Put Aside $400M for Dozens of ‘Ghost’ Schools that Never Opened
Emergency landing ends in tragedy as plane crashes on New Mexico golf course
US military carries out targeted strike on alleged narco-terrorist network in Ecuador
Trump Confirms He Will Withhold Endorsing Cornyn Until SAVE Act is On His Desk – He Also Makes Another Demand
Man accused of Iran-backed Trump assassination plot compared his plan to Butler shooting: FBI
ICE Arrests Illegal Alien in Idaho for Allegedly Trafficking Children Into State as Laborers
Miami developer accused of $85M fraud scheme, blowing investor cash on yacht, Rolex
Spanberger lashes out at Pentagon after Hegseth pulls colleges’ support over woke ‘ideologies’
Illegal Alien Charged With Fraudulently Voting in Crucial Swing State During 2024 Election
Florida Bar denies investigation into ex-US Attorney Lindsey Halligan
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
