Sotomayor at DACA Oral Arguments: ‘This Is About Our Choice to Destroy Lives’

During oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court Tuesday on he future of the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty program, Justice Sonia Sotomayor injected politics into the discussion, saying President Donald Trump has said he would find a way to keep DACA recipients in the United States but has not done so.

Sotomayor also addressed what other justices cited — the “reliance interests” of DACA recipients, or how the government program has allowed illegal migrants to get Social Security numbers, drivers licenses, and work permits that they have come to rely on.

Sotomayor said:

I think my colleagues have rightly pointed [out] there’s a whole lot of reliance interests that weren’t looked at, including the very President of — current President telling DACA-eligible people that they were safe under him and that he would find a way to keep them here. And so he hasn’t and, instead, he’s done this. And that, I think, has something to be considered before you rescind a policy.

“Right,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco said.

Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it ‘slap in the face’ to SCOTUS

Artemis II crew describes life aboard Orion spacecraft on historic journey to the moon and back

Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt talk free thinking and faith at TPUSA college tour kickoff

Karoline Leavitt reveals ‘anti-climatic’ way Trump told her she’d be press secretary: ‘Oh, by the way’

Trump slaps up to 100% tariff on some brand-name drug imports in major America First push

Two arrested in NC after police find 13-year-old kept in dog kennel, 5 other kids in ‘filthy’ home

Heart-pounding video shows fisherman leaping into ocean to save great white shark

Pete Hegseth signs memo opening door for troops to carry personal firearms on bases

Illegal migrant babysitter accused in 5-year-old attack now faces major charges

Florida, Mississippi join wave of states tightening voter citizenship rules

Trump Announces Plan to Help DHS Workers in Spite of ‘Radical Left’ Shutdown

Trump 2027 budget preview hints at sweeping scale-up in core agenda

Report: The Last Straw That Led to Trump Firing Pam Bondi Had to Do with Eric Swalwell

Gradual erosion of confidence led to Pam Bondi’s abrupt ouster

FBI Warns Congress of ‘Major’ Cyber Hack Involving China That Could Threaten National Security

“Not just say I’ll give you six months to do it,” Sotomayer said, referring to Trump’s past announcement that he would hold off on rescinding DACA for six months to allow Congress to come up with a legislative solution.

“And where is the political decision made clearly?” Sotomayor said referring to the June 22, 2018 memorandum issued by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to explain why the department was rescinding DACA.

“That this is not about the law; this is about our choice to destroy lives,” Sotomayor said, directly expressing what she believed a ruling to end DACA would mean to those enrolled in it.

The back and forth between the justices, Francisco and two attorneys who argued for DACA petitioners — attorney Ted Olson and Michael Mongan, Solicitor General at California Department of Justice – included more discussion about the impact the ruling would have on both DACA recipients and the future enforcement of federal immigration law.

Olson and Mongan argued that the Trump administration did not provide a compelling reason for rescinding DACA, which came to the high court after differing results in lower court decisions on the matter.