Sotomayor at DACA Oral Arguments: ‘This Is About Our Choice to Destroy Lives’

During oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court Tuesday on he future of the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty program, Justice Sonia Sotomayor injected politics into the discussion, saying President Donald Trump has said he would find a way to keep DACA recipients in the United States but has not done so.

Sotomayor also addressed what other justices cited — the “reliance interests” of DACA recipients, or how the government program has allowed illegal migrants to get Social Security numbers, drivers licenses, and work permits that they have come to rely on.

Sotomayor said:

I think my colleagues have rightly pointed [out] there’s a whole lot of reliance interests that weren’t looked at, including the very President of — current President telling DACA-eligible people that they were safe under him and that he would find a way to keep them here. And so he hasn’t and, instead, he’s done this. And that, I think, has something to be considered before you rescind a policy.

“Right,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco said.

House Republicans defend ICE agent in fatal shooting, say use of force was justified

California leads multistate lawsuit against Trump over child care funding freeze

Obama Presidential Center job listings push ‘anti-racism’ pledge ahead of opening

Trump Admin Considers Sending Large Payments to Every Greenland Resident in Bid to Acquire the Island: Report

First Hilton, Then Marriot, Now McDonald’s: Companies Rush to Embrace ICE as Conservative Pressure Campaign Crushes Woke Workers

‘Tip of the iceberg’: Senate Republicans press Gov Walz over Minnesota fraud scandal

Democratic socialist Mamdani ally mounts bid for US House of Representatives

Ohio dentist murders: Alley video, no forced entry fuel insider fears, experts say

Renee Nicole Good part of ‘ICE Watch’ group, DHS sources say

Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again

Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents

Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity

Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’

Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants

Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China

“Not just say I’ll give you six months to do it,” Sotomayer said, referring to Trump’s past announcement that he would hold off on rescinding DACA for six months to allow Congress to come up with a legislative solution.

“And where is the political decision made clearly?” Sotomayor said referring to the June 22, 2018 memorandum issued by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to explain why the department was rescinding DACA.

“That this is not about the law; this is about our choice to destroy lives,” Sotomayor said, directly expressing what she believed a ruling to end DACA would mean to those enrolled in it.

The back and forth between the justices, Francisco and two attorneys who argued for DACA petitioners — attorney Ted Olson and Michael Mongan, Solicitor General at California Department of Justice – included more discussion about the impact the ruling would have on both DACA recipients and the future enforcement of federal immigration law.

Olson and Mongan argued that the Trump administration did not provide a compelling reason for rescinding DACA, which came to the high court after differing results in lower court decisions on the matter.