Sotomayor at DACA Oral Arguments: ‘This Is About Our Choice to Destroy Lives’

During oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court Tuesday on he future of the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty program, Justice Sonia Sotomayor injected politics into the discussion, saying President Donald Trump has said he would find a way to keep DACA recipients in the United States but has not done so.

Sotomayor also addressed what other justices cited — the “reliance interests” of DACA recipients, or how the government program has allowed illegal migrants to get Social Security numbers, drivers licenses, and work permits that they have come to rely on.

Sotomayor said:

I think my colleagues have rightly pointed [out] there’s a whole lot of reliance interests that weren’t looked at, including the very President of — current President telling DACA-eligible people that they were safe under him and that he would find a way to keep them here. And so he hasn’t and, instead, he’s done this. And that, I think, has something to be considered before you rescind a policy.

“Right,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco said.

Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital

Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire

GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge

Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns

Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected

Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who died by suicide: ‘Lapse in judgment’

Commercial building explodes in New Jersey, multiple people injured and remain in critical condition

Five takeaways from Minnesota fraud hearing where Walz acknowledged failures

Walz mocked online after GOP lawmaker floats theory in heated hearing about why Kamala Harris chose him as VP

Fox News Poll: Voters give poor marks to economy, Congress and Trump

BREAKING: Kurds Open New Front Against Iranian Regime, Launch Major Ground Offensive

Watch: Schumer Repeatedly Struggles to Condemn Iran Strikes: ‘No One Wants a Nuclear Israel’

Starmer defends waffling on Iran: ‘Hanging on to President Trump’s latest words’ is not ‘special relationship in action’

Planning committee expecting outrage at White House ballroom meeting after 9,000 pages of negative comments

GOP begs Trump to endorse Cornyn as president teases decision ‘soon’

“Not just say I’ll give you six months to do it,” Sotomayer said, referring to Trump’s past announcement that he would hold off on rescinding DACA for six months to allow Congress to come up with a legislative solution.

“And where is the political decision made clearly?” Sotomayor said referring to the June 22, 2018 memorandum issued by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to explain why the department was rescinding DACA.

“That this is not about the law; this is about our choice to destroy lives,” Sotomayor said, directly expressing what she believed a ruling to end DACA would mean to those enrolled in it.

The back and forth between the justices, Francisco and two attorneys who argued for DACA petitioners — attorney Ted Olson and Michael Mongan, Solicitor General at California Department of Justice – included more discussion about the impact the ruling would have on both DACA recipients and the future enforcement of federal immigration law.

Olson and Mongan argued that the Trump administration did not provide a compelling reason for rescinding DACA, which came to the high court after differing results in lower court decisions on the matter.