Sotomayor at DACA Oral Arguments: ‘This Is About Our Choice to Destroy Lives’

During oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court Tuesday on he future of the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty program, Justice Sonia Sotomayor injected politics into the discussion, saying President Donald Trump has said he would find a way to keep DACA recipients in the United States but has not done so.

Sotomayor also addressed what other justices cited — the “reliance interests” of DACA recipients, or how the government program has allowed illegal migrants to get Social Security numbers, drivers licenses, and work permits that they have come to rely on.

Sotomayor said:

I think my colleagues have rightly pointed [out] there’s a whole lot of reliance interests that weren’t looked at, including the very President of — current President telling DACA-eligible people that they were safe under him and that he would find a way to keep them here. And so he hasn’t and, instead, he’s done this. And that, I think, has something to be considered before you rescind a policy.

“Right,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco said.

Socialism’s growing appeal meets an awkward reality check on college campus

Illinois County, Connecticut Cite Weapons You Never Heard of to Justify Their Gun Bans to SCOTUS

United Methodist Church Sees Considerable Membership Drop in U.S.: Report

Mike Johnson’s future hangs in balance as the ‘accidental speaker’ marks 3 years

Here are the states with voter ID on the ballot this November

Alarming fraud trend puts small-town mosque with industry and foreign govt ties in focus: ‘Our motherland now’

Leavitt says Trump is defying midterm headwinds as he barnstorms country

Florida A&M University shooting leaves 12 injured, including 6 children, near football stadium

Op-Ed: Stalin Believed in Predestination – Just Not the Calvinist Kind

Obama makes the case for el Sayed and a Democratic Party that can disagree

Constitutional Attorney: If We’re Not Careful, the US Could End Up Like France

Ukraine’s Starlink restored as Elon Musk claims Kyiv violated terms of service ‘to kill people’

Breaking: ‘Explosion’ at Quaker Oats Factory Rocks Midwest City as Large Smoke Cloud Looms

Obama compares Trump’s White House renovations to ‘Saddam Hussein opening a Cheesecake Factory’ at Ohio rally

Trump’s go-to Michigan auto worker gets a job and the spotlight

“Not just say I’ll give you six months to do it,” Sotomayer said, referring to Trump’s past announcement that he would hold off on rescinding DACA for six months to allow Congress to come up with a legislative solution.

“And where is the political decision made clearly?” Sotomayor said referring to the June 22, 2018 memorandum issued by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to explain why the department was rescinding DACA.

“That this is not about the law; this is about our choice to destroy lives,” Sotomayor said, directly expressing what she believed a ruling to end DACA would mean to those enrolled in it.

The back and forth between the justices, Francisco and two attorneys who argued for DACA petitioners — attorney Ted Olson and Michael Mongan, Solicitor General at California Department of Justice – included more discussion about the impact the ruling would have on both DACA recipients and the future enforcement of federal immigration law.

Olson and Mongan argued that the Trump administration did not provide a compelling reason for rescinding DACA, which came to the high court after differing results in lower court decisions on the matter.