On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Fauci to testify publicly before Congress for 1st time since retirement US senators demand answers on closure plan for California women’s prison where inmates were sexually abused Biden admin cracks down on power plants fueling nation’s grid Supreme Court to hear arguments in Trump presidential immunity case Biden sparks Christian group’s anger after making sign of the cross at abortion rally: ‘Disgusting insult’ Texas high school shooting leaves 18-year-old student dead, shot multiple times; suspect in custody Secret Service agent on VP Harris’ detail removed from assignment after physical fight while on duty Conn. Gov. Ned Lamont had thousands of trees, bushes ‘illegally’ cut behind $7.5M home More people exposed to Manhattan Project chemicals deserve compensation, advocates say Arizona alleged ‘fake electors’ who backed Trump in 2020 indicted by grand jury Watch: Woman’s How-To Video on Abortion Goes Wrong When People Notice What’s in Background “Numbers made up”,“Someone’s cooking the books” – Reaction to Biden’s Economic Numbers Watch: Abortion Advocate Desperately Tries to Interrupt Pastor’s Prayer at Capitol, Fails Miserably Fight Breaks Out with Harris’ Secret Service Detail – Agent Handcuffed, Removed from Scene UT Austin protests descend into chaos, anti-Israel students yell at police: ‘Pigs go home!’
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.