Featured News Opinons

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not a ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.


The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.


Christian university rebranding DEI to evade Trump order, enroll illegals, Tennessee rep says
Mike Huckabee Threatens to Declare Israel ‘No Longer Welcoming’ to Christian Organizations After ‘Shocking’ Policy Change
Former Voice of America Staffer Charged Over Alleged Death Threats Against Marjorie Taylor Greene
NIH still blaming FOIA delays on the pandemic
New York settles Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment case for nearly $500,000
Americans detained in Venezuela freed and returning home after prisoner exchange
Trump sues Wall Street Journal for libel after Epstein birthday letter story 
Trump vows to make US ‘crypto capital of the planet,’ signs GENIUS Act into law
Illegal pleads guilty to impregnating his own daughter at blue state migrant shelter
Watch: Rare ‘Firenado’ Captured on Video as it Cuts a Swath of Destruction
FBI captures final illegal immigrant inmate who escaped ICE facility in New Jersey
Illegal Alien Claimed She Was Illegally Kidnapped by ICE – Then the Surveillance Footage Was Located
Germany admits Europeans were ‘free riders’ on defense and national security
Border Patrol Hits Jackpot in Raid on California Home Depot
Missing mom’s convicted killer claims boyfriend tainted his trial
See also  Chinese military companies have already spent over $1 million lobbying Congress this year

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter