Featured News Opinons

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not a ‘Mother’


Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.


The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.


Jeff Bezos Renews Attack On Biden’s ‘Deep Misunderstanding’ Of Economics In Withering Tweet
Texas Supreme Court Allows Abortion Ban to Go into Effect
Another ‘Cassidy Blasey Ford’ Claim Appears Headed to the January 6 Committee Dumpster
Seattle Police Justify The “Defund the Police” Movement by Arresting a Preacher for Reading His Bible Too Close to a Gay Pride Event
Biden Blasted Over ‘Do It Now’ Demand On Privately Owned Gas Stations: ‘It’s YOUR Fault’
9-Foot Shark Attacks Girl, 17, Instantly Gets a Smack-Down by Her Brother
7 in 10 American Voters Do Not Want Joe Biden to Run for Reelection
Joe Biden Goes Under the Bus as Lefties Lash Out at His Lack of ‘Fight’
Autopsy: Ravens’ Jaylon Ferguson Died from ‘Combined Effects of Fentanyl and Cocaine’
FOIAs Reveal Progressive Money Fueling FBI, DOJ, Leftist Activist and Election Official Coordination
Former Top Obama Advisor David Axelrod Shreds Biden, Says He’s ‘Not in Command’
Jordan Peterson: I’d Rather Die Than Delete Truthful Tweet For Cancel Creeps
‘Just Stop Oil’ Activists Protest, Glue Themselves to Van Gogh Painting
Biden’s Economy Sees Worst First Half for Stocks Since 1872
Democratic Congressman Henry Cuellar Slams AOC and the Biden Administration
See also  Arizona To Become The Nation’s ‘Gold Standard For School Choice,’ Passing Universal Bill For One Million Students

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

Story cited here.

→ What are your thoughts? ←
Scroll down to leave a comment: