Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Iranian sleeper cells may be hiding ‘in plain sight’ waiting to target rural US areas, terrorism expert warns
Camp flooding puts parents on edge as tragedy shows danger of sending kids away for summer
Why Trump’s undeniable winning streak is drawing a barrage of negative coverage
Family-owned Texas restaurant works to feed first responders: ‘We’re thankful for them’
Illegal immigrant killer of Laken Riley wins unexpected court victory for mental evaluation
Andrew Yang ‘in touch’ with Musk over America Party: ‘Happy to help’
Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally’s third party push
Israeli prime minister answers whether he is worried about being jailed in NYC by Zohran Mamdani
Federal judge pauses Trump administration’s Planned Parenthood defunding measure
Netanyahu surprises Trump with formal Nobel Peace Prize nomination during historic White House meeting
Navy’s carrier fleet faces temporary reduction through 2027 as new ships hit development snags
‘A Depraved Lie’: White House Fires Back After Schumer, Dems Push Disgusting Smears
NYC’s Campaign Finance Board Is Tipping the Scales in Favor of Mamdani in a Big Way
Some wealthy New York elites surprisingly back NYC socialist candidate who wants to tax them more
Suspect in Border Patrol Ambush Identified – Strange Writing Found on His Car
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
