Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Army soldiers from Minnesota, Michigan perish in separate Middle East incidents
Murdered Democratic lawmaker’s home broken into just days after fatal shooting
Chinese educator with several CCP ties cozies up to top New York Democrats: ‘Our old friend who listens’
‘We won’: Social media erupts over SCOTUS ruling dealing ‘fatal blow’ to transgender surgeries on minors
Hawley demands Biden release autopen consent records or face subpoena
Senate confirms Rodney Scott as Trump’s border agency head
Overnight break-in reported at the home of Minnesota lawmaker killed
Trump Chides Reporter Over Iran Question: ‘You Don’t Seriously Think I’m Going to Answer That?’
Meals Sold at Walmart and Kroger Recalled as Deadly Outbreak Is Investigated
State senator, Indian immigrant, pulls upset in Virginia Democratic lieutenant governor’s race
Migrant influx pushing Mass. shelter costs past $1B in FY25: report
Gov. Kathy Hochul Tells New Yorkers They’ll Be Paying Big Bucks to Illegal Aliens – Did She Just Throw Her Job Away?
Democratic split on US involvement in Iran spells more trouble for Schumer
New flyer shows suspected killer dad may have changed appearance in wilderness manhunt: police
White House Fires Back After ‘Disgraceful’ Jim Acosta Takes Sick Shot at Trump’s Deceased Ex-Wife
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
