Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Kid Rock Opens Up About What Inspired His New Gospel Album, and It’s Quite the Story
Ukraine drone strikes and Iran war split blame on skyrocketing diesel prices
CBS Tried to Trash Trump Again, Now They’re Facing Another Multimillion Suit, This Time from a 15-Year-Old They Trashed
Tish James confronted on camera over Trump’s accusation of bias in Cornell rape case
Democrats’ latest gun-control push runs into inconvenient fact about how school killer was stopped
Obama’s star power gets a reality check from Black voters in crucial Senate race: ‘It’s a turn-off’
Trump says he doesn’t know who ordered Starshield throttle in Ukraine
Biden judge rejects Obama CIA chief’s legal bid against Trump over one key problem
Bryan Kohberger fights to remove judge who called him ‘worst of the worst,’ questioned his honesty
Former University of Kentucky cheerleader sentenced to 10 years in prison for infant’s death
Watch: Dem Nominee Troy Jackson Tells Sen. Susan Collins to ‘Shut Up’ as Heckler Causes Debate Chaos
Breaking: Katie Zacharia Out as White House Press Secretary
Black civic group blasts Talarico campaign over canceled event: ‘Deeply disappointed’
Americans back Trump’s decision against livestreaming Nidal Hasan’s firing squad execution
Where to Get American-Made Ivermectin at a Price You Can’t Beat
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
