Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump nominates Chris Klomp for HHS deputy secretary, calls him ‘a potential STAR’
Muslim Mamdani-backed socialist primary winner suggested America deserved 9/11 in unearthed video
Slotkin says Democratic Party needs ‘new leadership’: ‘Old models are no longer working’
Trump administration pledges $150M in aid, deploys Navy warships after deadly Venezuela earthquakes
Florida executes 74-year-old for wife’s murder, becoming oldest inmate put to death in state’s modern history
A Warning Charlie Kirk Gave Back in 2020 Coming True Now Within Democratic Party
French citizen who illegally cast ballot in 2022 midterms says New Jersey automatically registered him to vote
Jury deadlocks in federal trial of man accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire in Los Angeles
Dems put on blast over poll that shows record-low patriotism in US: ‘Tear our society apart’
Blue state leaders erupt after Supreme Court’s decision ending TPS protections for Haitians, Syrians
Real Man: Churchgoer Can’t Find Tool to Free Kids from Sweltering Car, Says ‘My Fist Will Probably Work,’ Then, With God’s Help, Starts Smashing Glass
Red state gov bans July Fourth fireworks statewide over wildfire concerns ahead of America’s 250th anniversary
Four charged in alleged billion dollar healthcare fraud tied to Russian transnational criminal organization
Hunter Biden, Man Who Isn’t in Prison Thanks to Dem Establishment, Attacks Dem Establishment After Primary Stunners
EXCLUSIVE: DHS asks Florida not to release illegal immigrant accused of drugging, raping woman after clubbing
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
