Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Illegal immigrant gets 30 years for raping 11-year-old Virginia girl multiple times
Apparent road rage incident sparks deadly Texas shooting spree across 2 cities, leaving 4 dead
Turning Point Confirms Authenticity of Leaked Charlie Kirk Text Messages About Conflicts with Donors
Trump to undergo ‘routine’ yearly medical exam at Walter Reed while visiting troops in Maryland
Israel-Hamas peace deal reached soon after Trump says it’s ‘very close’ in White House note pass with Rubio
Fact Check: Did Trump Refer to Puerto Rico as a ‘Mexican City’?
House Democrats intensify Homan bribery investigation after Bondi sidesteps questions
Biden’s suppression of CIA report on Ukraine trip bolsters calls for FBI review of corruption evidence
Cruz to introduce bill protecting citizens from government censorship
Resurfaced social media post comes back to haunt disgraced Dem AG nominee: ‘Delete your account’
IRS workforce slashed in half as government shutdown showdown stretches into second week
Trump says peace deal between Israel and Hamas ‘very close,’ may travel to Middle East
Trump uses government shutdown to redefine what’s ‘essential’ to him
Democrat Candidate Jay Jones, Who Fantasized About Murdering GOP Leader, Cancels Event as Campaign Hits ‘Crisis Mode’
China: Taiwan president ‘prostituting himself’ making overtures to Trump
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
