Featured • News • Opinons

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not a ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.


The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.


Sharia Law, Human Trafficking, and Modern-Day Slavery: When Religious Authority Becomes a License to Enslave Women
Even Stephen A. Smith is Fed Up with Dems’ Hegseth Impeachment Shenanigans: ‘Exactly What We Don’t Need’
The GOP knives are out for Trump Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick
Democrat Cindy Holscher wins Kansas governor’s race, extending party’s hold on governor’s mansion
‘No ongoing investigations’ into Democrats’ oversight threats, Blanche says
‘Kill a cop’: Leftists see gun charges dropped due to conservative Second Amendment push
Mamdani prepares to fulfill promise to axe NYPD unit responsible for controlling protest violence
Trump Drops Bombshell on Blue-State Governors, and They Should Be Very Nervous
TOXIC RAGE: DC Shooter Had ‘Obsession’ Over Mold in His $1.1M Apartment
Democrats turn on Schumer after historic election wins as potential challenger emerges
The top Trump officials Democrats admit are on their hit list for investigations in the new Congress
Matt Lambert, DC doctor, identified as gunman in deadly attack after HOA feud
Family of slain 8-year-old challenges Newsom’s decision to commute California death row sentences
Fact Check: Yes, Muslim-Majority US City Has OK’d Animal Sacrifices, and It’s Even Worse Than Story Currently Going Viral
Oklahoma man, 73, executed for plotting murder of lover’s husband, offers no last words
See also  Prosecutor overseeing Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ investigation resigns

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter