Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
California mayor’s hot mic catches candid exchange after audience sends meeting off rails
Never Forget Dems Supported Large-Scale Deportations Until Trump Took Up the Issue – Just Listen to What Obama Said in 2014
Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman admits to sufficient facts in June drunken driving case
House Democrats Furious at Their Own Campaign Arm Over Expensive Primary Blunder
Ex-Dem Legislator Arrested Over Child Porn, But It’s 7 Words from FBI Investigator That Will Make You Sick to Your Stomach
Hunter Biden Blasts CNN’s Jake Tapper as a ‘Poor Journalist’ and a Terrible Person in NSFW Comments
Dem’s stunning ideal standard for immigration detention conditions resurfaces amid Texas senate bid
Secret Service agent on JD Vance’s detail investigated for allegedly leaking operational security info
Accused killer’s alleged disguises unravel as sheriff releases new clues in month-long manhunt
Foster child allegedly drowned in lake by two teens on local politician’s property: authorities
From the dugout to the White House: LA Dodgers celebrate World Series glory with Trump
Video: Trump Greets Fallen Heroes at Dignified Transfer for Troops Killed in Iran Conflict
GOP rallies around Thune after White House says Trump’s patience is ‘running out’
Six-figure private security bill for top Dem Senate hopeful fuels GOP hypocrisy claims
Former Biden Admin Official Roasts Kamala’s 2028 Chances on Fox News: ‘She Follows’
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
