Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Mamdani picks educator who worked to dismantle Gifted & Talented program as NYC schools chancellor
Former Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell dead at 92
Democrat Renee Hardman wins Iowa Senate special election, denying GOP supermajority
Missing elderly person found in bitter cold woods after police deploy thermal imaging drone
DHS reviews citizenship cases from Somalia, other high risk countries for possible fraud
Judge suggests DOJ leadership pushed for Kilmar Abrego Garcia prosecution
Florida firefighters allegedly waterboarded, whipped rookie over TikTok video as 4 face criminal charges
Bear remains under California home after weeks of failed removal attempts
Wild video shows speeding car going airborne, ejects driver into backyard pool
Mainstream Media Reporter Slammed for Insane Suggestion About Somali Day Care Owners Turning to Violence
SEE IT: Daycare center at heart of Minnesota fraud investigation fixes sign after viral mockery
Shirley associate in viral video says he filed criminal complaint against Walz over daycare fraud allegations
Mamdani taps controversial lawyer who defended al Qaeda terrorist for top role: ‘Powerful advocate’
Fox News Politics Newsletter: House GOP whip calls for revoking citizenship over Minnesota fraud
HHS freezes Minnesota child care payments over alleged daycare fraud scheme
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
