Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Closed-door outburst turns into victory for Trump’s Iran negotiations
‘America is back’: Trump kicks off Great American State Fair with flyovers, patriotic National Mall speech
Body believed to be Kansas City highway shooting suspect found in burned home’s basement by family: police
Pennsylvania mother’s video captures armed intruder holding her toddler as she begs for child’s release
‘High casualties’ feared after two powerful earthquakes rock Venezuela: USGS
Sean Hannity Issues Explanation After Viewers Express Concern About His On-Air Appearance
Tempers Flare and Voices Are Raised as Trump and Senate Republican Go Toe-to-Toe in Closed Door Meeting
Christian Judge Who Refused to Perform Gay Weddings ‘Vindicated’ in Big Court Ruling
ALERT: 2 Major Earthquakes Within Minutes of Each on Different Parts of Globe – Injury Situations Unclear – VIDEO
New York congressional primary becomes second most expensive House race ever amid AI fight
Unearthed video exposes vulnerable House Dem’s reversal on crucial issue impacting state
Feds bust a dozen for allegedly smuggling drugs and phones into prisons using ‘heavy payload drone’
Dem Congressional Candidate Caught Bringing Sex Offender Who Victimized 8-Year-Old with Him to School Event
Mamdani-Backed Candidate Who Blamed 9/11 on American ‘Capitalism and Racism’ Wins Democratic Primary
Comer probes alleged Biden collusion with gun control activists in Glock lawsuit
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
