Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Protester storms DC party, flips off crowd as ‘USA!’ chants erupt amid Trump’s AI push
Viewers Beg for Cancellation of MTV Video Music Awards After Chaos, Incompetence, and Gross Madonna Ruin Already Vile Awards Show
DOJ pleads with Supreme Court to save ban on transgender treatments in federal prisons
Homeless Man Arrested in Brutal Murder of a 63-Year-Old Woman in Central Park
Sweden’s left-wing coalition fails to form government, opening possibility for right wing to stay in charge
Reporter’s Notebook: Senate Republicans scrap early exit from Washington as midterm stakes soar
Blue city funds immigrant activist program with taxpayer dollars, critics say it ‘shuts citizens out’
AOC gives major hint about 2028 as Democrat civil war looms
Walz’s ‘exit interview’ reflecting on his tenure sparks lawmaker debate about his legacy: ‘Never serious’
Former Climate Reporter: My Industry Protected the Climate Change Narrative By Killing Positive News Stories
Degeneracy: School Protected Teacher Taking Sexual Pics of 10-Year-Olds Because He Is Gay and ‘Bats for the Other Team,’ Court Docs Say
Government-Owned Capitalism: Brilliant Strategy or Socialist Disaster?
Key Alaska Senate Race Comes Down to One Issue: Fish
AOC’s Ivy League warmup act leads democratic socialists in notorious anti-Israel chant
Lindsay Clancy holdout juror’s lawyer challenges claim he broke the law and more top headlines
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
