Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Conservatives Are Done with ‘They’re Going to Jail’ – Actually Give Us the Perp Walk
Cocky Singer, Trump Hater Miley Cyrus Breaks Humiliating Record, as Album Release Sees Historic Crash and Burn
Memphis City Council devolves into chaos after data center moratorium vote postponed
Rubio to deliver urgent plea to save Western civilization during speech in its birthplace
DHS orders deportation of illegal migrant who sold fraudulent DHS, FBI ‘immunity’ cards
Declassified docs raise questions about Jack Smith’s Trump trial testimony and more top headlines
Chinese military activity nearly doubles around key US ally in disputed waters
Mamdani’s $30M plan to fight antisemitism includes increased funding for anti-Israel group
Clarence Thomas’ Incisive Questions Expose Big Problem with ‘Climate Reparations’ Case
New York Times Campaigns for the Indiana Fever to Part with Sophie Cunningham Because of Conservatives
How Oct. 7 and Israel loom large over 2028 Democratic presidential race
Republicans are not talking about Trump’s biggest 2024 campaign promise
Federal judge blocks Trump administration fines of up to $1.8M for migrants
Man pleads guilty to 2023 killing of Lauren Heike on Phoenix hiking trail
Watch: US Soccer Player Takes Possibly Worst Dive Ever Caught on Camera After Mexico Player Barely Taps Him
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
