Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
FBI arrests leftist Senate hopeful for alleged death threats against Trump, Congress member and daughter
Rideshare passenger held hostage for eight hours during armed standoff with police in swanky neighborhood
Trump Offers New Retirement Account Opportunity to Americans
Bernie Sanders campaigns with controversial Michigan Senate candidate
Building the White House Ballroom Shouldn’t Be a Partisan Issue After Horrific WHCD Shooting
Pritzker calls for criminal investigations into ICE agents over ‘Midway Blitz’ conduct
California leaders mum on $1B high-speed rail detour aimed at preserving disgraced labor leader’s memorial
Research Team Reveals the Secret of Ancient Biblical Manuscript
Tensions between John Thune and Mike Johnson loom over GOP immigration push
After NASCAR’s Greg Biffle And Family Died, Police Think ‘Friends’ Stole from Them
State Department fires back at accusations of ‘empty planes’ rescuing Americans from conflict zones
Inside the coming battle over Virginia’s abortion ballot referendum
Iowa woman died following hernia repair after nurses dismissed painful post-surgery symptoms: lawsuit
Shooting during party at Oklahoma’s Arcadia Lake leaves at least 10 wounded, police say
Marco Rubio spotted behind DJ booth at family wedding as social media reacts to viral clip
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
