Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Los Angeles County declares local state of emergency over ICE raid surge
Family says off-duty Milwaukee officer acted appropriately in fatal shooting caught on dashcam video
Trump posthumously awards Charlie Kirk Presidential Medal of Freedom: Photos
Judge temporarily blocks transfer of Miami land for Trump presidential library
Hochul fires at Stefanik over New York Young Republicans’ leaked texts
Erika Kirk honors late husband Charlie in emotional White House tribute: ‘A free man made fully free’
Republican lawmakers demand Treasury probe CAIR over alleged Hamas ties and terrorism concerns
DHS Confirms Sickening Plot ‘From Mexico’ Targeting ICE and CBP Agents
‘Unsightly tactics’: Feds react to nude bicycle protesters who bared all outside ICE facility
Israel receives remains of four more hostages kidnapped by Hamas
Longtime LendingTree CEO Dies in Accident on Family Farm
Trump blasts ‘weakened’ Schumer as Democrats again block GOP effort to reopen government
Watch: ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on Jasmine Crockett for Her ‘Street’ Persona
Zohran Mamdani’s NYC mayoral campaign took foreign cash, raising compliance questions
Trump Calls Out Time Magazine for Using ‘Really Weird’ Photo of Him for Cover: ‘What Are They Doing, and Why?’
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.