Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Woman’s body washes ashore in Florida as investigators dig into beach discovery
Shelter-in-place order issued in Chicago suburb as police hunt suspect after reported shooting
Trump Upbraids 4 Republicans Who Sided with Dems on Iran War Powers Resolution Vote During Peace Negotiations
Bessent spars with Dem in fiery Trump tax showdown until claim crosses the line: ‘Slanderous’
SEE IT: Lavish $35M mansion bought by tech CEO accused of feeding US gear to Iran’s nuclear machine
Famous YouTuber Doesn’t Get the Response He Hoped for After Explaining Why He Murdered His Unborn Child
Ayatollah says Iran has ‘defeated’ US as Trump, Rubio acknowledge he’s playing active role in regime
DeSantis Rips California’s ‘Corrosive’ Election System: ‘Count Until You Get the Result You Want?’
Watch: Chaos Erupts at High School Graduation When Graduates Begin Punching Each Other
Tulsi Gabbard reveals husband’s ‘very rare sacral chordoma’: ‘In a lot of pain’ after 7-hour surgery
Dozens of anti-ICE protesters won’t face state charges for storming Minnesota church service, prosecutor says
Former National Security Advisor John Bolton to plead guilty to retaining classified information: sources
Luigi Mangione hearing sealed at defense request as court refuses to explain secrecy
SEE IT: House floor erupts after GOP lawmaker accuses Tlaib of Hezbollah ties
Trump Sounds Alarm on ‘Big Cheating’ in California Gov. and LA Mayor Primaries as Vote Tally Is Updated
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
