Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
A rare filing in the Lisa Cook–Trump case could sway Supreme Court justices
US immigration authorities allow suspect in $100M jewelry heist to self-deport before trial
Judge rules NYC’s lone Republican congressional district unconstitutional, orders redraw
Rahm Emanuel calls for mandatory retirement age of 75 for people in public office
Teen mass killer pleads guilty to NC rampage that left five dead, including brother, police officer
Barron Trump Saved a Woman’s Life as She Was Being Beaten by Her Boyfriend in UK, Reported Victim Says
Organizer of GoFundMe for ‘agitating the Nazis’ involved in anti-ICE uprising at Minneapolis church
Jury reaches verdict in trial of ex-Uvalde school police officer accused of failing to confront gunman
BREAKING: Brace for Riots – Cuban Illegal / Child Molester’s Death in ICE Custody Ruled Homicide, Despite Fact That Testimony Came from Other Detainees
Top NATO official reveals details of stunning meeting with Trump that produced Greenland deal ‘framework’
Appeals court hands Trump admin ‘victory’ in Minnesota ICE force restrictions case
Noem and Lewandowski waged campaign to oust Trump’s border leader: Sources
Border Patrol chief targeted in alleged murder-for-hire plot focused on Snapchat messages
Backfire: TDSing European Parliament Member Gets Shut Down in Assembly When His Anti-Trump Fit Goes Way Too Far
Somali-born activist praises Trump’s stark warning at Davos speech: ‘Priority No. 1’
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
