Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
ICE arrests illegal alien who allegedly faked asylum claim based on homosexuality, became Indiana jail officer
Hasan Piker says UK has barred him, trashes ‘unbelievable…power’ of pro-Israel groups
Pratt rallies supporters as Los Angeles mayoral race enters final stretch
Left-wing streamer blasts New Jersey governor over state police response at ICE facility protests
Man who warned coworkers ‘no one’s going home today’ gets prison term in fatal shooting
Scott Peterson’s longtime lawyer claims ‘new’ evidence could force courts to revisit his murder conviction
Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened
Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms
NYPD commissioner ‘proudly’ leads Israel parade as grand marshal; Mamdani breaks tradition, avoids event
NASA Reveals Moon Base Plan With Construction Process Beginning as Early as 2029
Trump warns judge against sacrificing national security by blocking White House ballroom, drone base
The Civil War Never Really Ended, But an American Union Could Finally Help America Truly Heal
Why NATO’s defense spending imbalance lasted for decades
Trump expands Turkey ambassador’s diplomatic role, adding Iraq, Syria amid Middle East tensions
Does China Have The Upper Hand?
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
