Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Atlanta airport asks travelers to arrive four hours early as ICE comes to help
Despite Trump Policies, Stanford Still Has This Woke DEI Program
Breaking: Trump Orders Halt to All Strikes on Iranian Energy Infrastructure as End to Conflict Near
Supreme Court reverses lower court on qualified immunity for Vermont police sergeant who arrested protester
CNN Tries To Rebrand Anderson Cooper As Podcaster In Sad Grab For Relevance
Taylor Lorenz Wants to Bring Back Masking in the Name of ‘Basic Solidarity’: ‘We’re 6 Years Into a Pandemic’
Power Couple of Chaos: How a tycoon and activist built a ‘Revolutionary Base’ at the House of Singham
Trump orders War Dept to postpone strikes on Iranian energy sites, citing ‘productive’ talks to end war
Two pilots dead after plane collides with fire truck on LaGuardia Airport runway and more top headlines
Iran’s Alarming Long-Range Missile Capacity Revealed After Regime Fired at US-UK Base 2,500 Miles Away
Dem Senate candidate in the hot seat after anti-meat comment resurfaces: ‘This will haunt him’
Trump Reacts to Robert Mueller’s Death: ‘Good, I’m Glad He’s Dead’
Biden officials who backed Microsoft software breached by China now work for Microsoft
9 suspects arrested after $7M in stolen cargo seized in Southern California bust
Man charged in $90M Medicare fraud scheme; DOJ says suspect may have entered US illegally
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
