Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
US Marshals Find 79 Missing and Endangered Children During Historic Operation
Breaking: US Responds to Failed Iran Strikes, Attacks Oil Tankers as Iran’s Economy Deteriorates
Lindsay Clancy juror admitted ‘reasonable doubt’ but still refused insanity verdict, foreperson says
Mamdani drops massive 9/11 records trove as old claims about Ground Zero come under fire
Karmelo Anthony photographed with guns as docs reveal alleged history of rage, threats and violence
Kansas Republicans buck Trump over threat to blacklist Canadian jets
Fetterman leans on unlikely GOP ally as Dems sharpen their knives over explosive report
House Oversight Committee Calls Out LA Mayor Karen Bass After She Dodges Testifying at Hearing
Popular Egyptian TV Host Sentenced to Death by Hanging in Drug Trafficking Case
Major blue state hospital pulls plug on controversial child transgender treatments after DOJ intervention
Reporter’s Notebook: Dem rebels expose cracks in Jeffries’ House leadership
Socialist Convention Panelists Declare Fitness ‘Body Fascism,’ Claim Capitalism is ‘Genociding Fat People’
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Announces Symbolic Change to Official Agency Seal
EXCLUSIVE: Newsom says Democrats ‘stopped showing up’ as California governor makes his case to the South
Eiffel Tower reopens following staff strike over female workers removed during Hindu leaders’ visit
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
