Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Top Dem admits Trump ‘wisely’ made critical demand to NATO allies: ‘Love and hate relationship’
Leftist California group pushes to add ‘Black English’ to schools’ multilingual education program
Officers in Maryland respond to reported assault, discover guns and unusual group of animals
Watch: US Conducts Massive Strikes, Hits 80 Targets After Iran Attacks Ships in Strait, This as Trump Says Ceasefire Is Dead
DOJ Puts Election Officials in All 50 States on Notice: Prevent Noncitizen Voting or Else
Erika Kirk comforts a stranger in tears during hearing for husband’s accused assassin Tyler Robinson
Shipping through Strait of Hormuz declared dangerous with Iran ceasefire in jeopardy
Platner campaign putting ‘thumb on scale’ to influence possible replacement, Maine Dem alleges
Uncertain status of McConnell could create legal firestorm over possible replacement
Former acting DHS secretary warns Chinese criminal organizations are infiltrating America’s hemp industry
America 250 attendees rally behind Trump’s July 4 speech: ‘What we needed to hear’
This Texan led armed ‘community defense’ for leftists. Now he’s serving 100 years behind bars
Trump says Iran ceasefire is ‘over’ after Iranian attacks trigger massive US response
Tyler Robinson’s and Lance Twiggs’ DNA both allegedly found on key evidence in Charlie Kirk’s assassination
US Navy identifies sailor lost in Arabian Sea after helicopter’s emergency water landing
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
