Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Biden-era enviro rule accused of strangling truckers, squeezing Americans lands on Trump chopping block
Fury erupts as US brand fires 1,600 employees after securing thousands of foreign worker visas
Who is running to replace Graham Platner?
Air Force rescinding 135 promotions after test scoring error: ‘This is going to be hard’
Viral Clip Proves Jasmine Crockett Still Can’t Blame Herself for Senate Primary Loss to Talarico: ‘It Was a Racist Race’
Watch: Trump Says Iranian Leaders Begging for New Deal But He’s Not Sure ‘They’re Worthy’
Trump says Democrats replacing Platner is ‘very hard for them to do’
Charlie Kirk family demands judge reveal hidden evidence from accused assassin’s hearing
Trump’s voter ID bill catches unlikely break as McConnell remains sidelined
DOJ’s Harmeet Dhillon: Some states have ‘homework to do’ to keep noncitizens from voting in midterm elections
House Republican Thomas Massie suggests Obamacare could now be labeled ‘Trumpcare’
Trump holds Washington hostage over SAVE Act as midterm clock ticks on GOP control
Maryland may finally see redistricting action — just not the way Wes Moore wanted
US on track to intercept 16 times as many suspected terrorists at border under Trump thanks to cartel designations
Music and patriotism: Dukes of Hazzard star praises community and family at Great American State Fair
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
