Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Watch: Trump’s NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya Unloads on Fauci Over Texts Showing He Thought One Thing, But Said Another to American Mothers
Zuckerberg Superyacht Accused of Ignoring Vessel’s Call for Help – Alaskan Cruise Captain Comes to the Rescue
Trump directs CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz to end Medicaid gender transition funding for minors
Suspect in off-duty Philadelphia officer’s car theft linked to killing of Penn State student: police
DOJ won’t rule out new charges for Reflecting Pool vandals as Trump calls to revisit dropped cases
Vulnerable Dem’s campaign pitch clashes with ‘radical’ voting record on top culture war issue
Man wanted in robbery tied to Penn State student’s murder now sought after off-duty cop shootout
Democrats give Senate GOP new midterm ammo in opposing federal voter ID
Syria’s death sentence for Assad puts new strain on revamped relationship with Russia
Watch: Another Talarico Clip Comes Back to Bite Him as He Characterizes Christians as ‘Causing Trouble’
Socialist Wisconsin governor candidate referred to America as ‘abundance of suffering,’ resurfaced post shows
HHS bureaucrats accused of ‘sabotaging’ RFK Jr’s efforts to expose Fauci records
Russia Releases American Military Veteran Who Was Taken Prisoner During Biden Administration
Replacement GOP nominee named after Rep Chuck Edwards drops re-election bid
US Marine veteran released from Russian prison after 1,666 days of detention
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
