Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries
People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules
Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’
American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps
Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme
New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state
Missing 1200-pound giraffe Gracie found 2 weeks after wandering away from ranch in viral search
Texas Board of Education approves required reading list with Bible passages for 5 million students
Mamdani’s Socialist Dream is Becoming a Reality as NYC Freezes 1 Million Rents
Warren tells Trump to ‘sign the damn bill’ as bipartisan housing package remains stalled in Washington
‘Baked to death’: Homan rips media while sharing horrific scenes from border enforcement career
GOP is Launching Election Integrity Project with Page from Soros Playbook
Bill Barr calls on Senate GOP to confirm Todd Blanche for attorney general
New limited-edition US passport features Trump’s image and a warning
Judge Shuts Down Tyler Robinson’s Attempt to Dodge Death Penalty
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
