Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Mamdani breaks with Adams, vows NYC will stop clearing homeless encampments in January
Mamdani says NYPD commissioner apologized after her brother called him ‘enemy’ of the Jewish people at gala
Harvard professor detained by ICE after Boston synagogue shooting, agrees to voluntarily leave US
Democrats’ anger at federal government hit record high just days before shutdown: Pew poll
DHS arrests dozens of illegal immigrants within 24 hours of launching New Orleans operation
Breaking: DC Pipe Bomb Suspect’s Family Has History of Working to Free Illegals from ICE, Sued the Trump Admin, And Used Trayvon Martin’s Lawyer to Fight So-Called Racism
Washington DC lights the National Christmas Tree
Ex–New York State official accused of spying for China called Hochul ‘more obedient’ than Cuomo, trial reveals
US carries out 22nd strike on alleged drug vessel operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization
‘I Didn’t Stutter’: Stephen A. Smith and Sunny Hostin Clash on ‘The View’ Over Video Urging Troops to Ignore Trump
Absolute Tragedy: U.S. Marine Dies After Horrific Camp Pendleton Accident
Suspected thieves caught on camera smashing Washington state storefront with truck in ATM heist attempt
Blue State’s Dems Steamroll Redistricting Change That All But Erases Its GOP from Congress
Watch: Audience Gasps as Halle Berry Goes Scorched-Earth on Gavin Newsom During Speech
Grand jury declines to indict Letitia James after earlier case collapsed
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
