Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Ground Stops Ordered for DC-Area Airports
Vance: White House Plans to ‘Go After’ Ilhan Omar for Alleged Immigration Fraud
NYC Dem, Hochul aide under investigation over alleged migrant shelter bribes
Democrats pounce on $4 a gallon gas, blame Trump’s Iran war for ‘broken promise’
Woman Tries Getting Birth Certificate, SS Card, and Marriage License to See if Dems Are Honest – Says She Caught Them Lying Through Their Teeth
Trump Seethes After France Blocks American Military Planes: ‘The USA Will Remember’
Hegseth reveals covert visit to troops fighting in Operation Epic Fury
Trump’s proposed presidential library revealed as towering Miami skyscraper in striking new video
Outrage grows as ICE detainer ignored in connection to killing of 24-year-old mother and more top headlines
Scoop: House Speaker Mike Johnson’s allies unleash $10M campaign to spotlight Trump tax cuts
Florida county’s Democratic Party chair accused of hitting man in head with bullhorn at ‘No Kings’ protest
Trump reveals first look at presidential library in Miami
Teacher of the Year finalist gets 14 years for sexual relationship with student she kept contacting
Top Ten King-Like Things Barack Obama Did That Democrats Had No Problem With
Fugitive illegal alien convict on the run after attempting to strike ICE officer with vehicle: DHS
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
