Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
El Sayed asks Haley Stevens to stay away from campaign events in dramatic 11th-hour feud escalation
Why the Ilhan Omar saga isn’t going away
Christian group touts ‘ethical’ tech features as concerns over out-of-control AI tools persist
CodePink leader adds muscle to well-funded fight to ban restaurant delicacy
How to follow 2026 Election Day coverage on Fox News platforms
Tinder killer who believed he was a warlock said he ‘picked the wrong person’ after murdering woman
Virginia’s Dem AG Calls AR-15 Rifles ‘Machine Guns’ in Stunningly Ignorant Brief to SCOTUS
Report: ‘Presbyterian Seminarian’ Talarico Had Account On Adult Hookup Website, Was Looking for ‘Group Sex,’ ‘Fetish’ Partners
Manning: The Truth About Why Dems Demand Endless War in Ukraine Is So Much Worse Than Almost Anyone Imagines
Gavin Newsom touts ‘ruthless’ approach to politics in New Hampshire pitch
Questions still haunt Houdini’s Halloween death 100 years later
Violence Against Christians Claims More Lives as 40 or More Ethiopians Slaughtered, at Least 2 Churches Attacked
Trump admin threatens Iran with ‘consequences’ as allies convene amid threats of post-election escalation
Why Keisha Lance Bottoms is trailing Jon Ossoff in Georgia
Watch: Muslim Debater Begs Security to Remove Christian Apologist After He Tells the Truth About Islam
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
