Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Hillary Clinton caught on video stepping back after pushy former president nudges her at busy NYC intersection
Shipping disruptions spread beyond oil: Helium, sulfur, and semiconductors
3 brothers of Iraqi descent arrested in Oslo for allegedly ‘terror bombing’ of US Embassy
Republican Sen. John Cornyn Calls on GOP to Change Filibuster and Pass SAVE Act as He Prepares for Primary Runoff Against Ken Paxton
Minnesota human services officials skip fraud hearing as Walz promises reform
‘You can cry about it’: Tempers flare in Senate as DHS shutdown debate erupts, stalemate digs deeper
Conquered: NYC Firefighters Angry After Bosses, Muslim Firefighters Make Startling Change to 9/11 Memorial Area for Ramadan
Why Republican Steve Hilton increasing his lead in the California polls could be beneficial for Democrats
Wife of former Gov Terry McAuliffe jumps into crowded Dem congressional primary race
Hawley introduces bill to strip FDA approval from ‘inherently dangerous’ abortion pill
Gene Simmons tells celebrities ‘shut the f*** up’ about politics
Developing: FBI Took Terabytes of Arizona Election Data After Reviewing ‘Alarming’ Report Citing Opened Pallets Full of Blank Ballots
Starmer was warned about ‘reputational risk’ of Peter Mandelson’s Epstein ties, files show
Foreign-backed group serves as bridge between GOP and Russia-friendly Europeans
Trump ally Clay Fuller advances in Georgia fight for MTG’s former seat
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
