Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
MN Dem Sen candidate in hot seat over upcoming event hosted by man enveloped in fraud scandal: ‘Red flags’
Thune’s midterm crossroads: Keep the Senate working or let candidates campaign
Republicans face brutal midterm headwinds. Six forces could help them defy history.
Parents accuse Oregon hospital of making them drive dead baby home to Seattle: lawsuit
Tennessee cops raided man’s home after he criticized officer for speeding: lawsuit
Pure Evil: Missouri Mother Pleads Out After Baking Tiny Baby to Death in Oven – Her Sentence Proves Society Has Lost Its Way
Illegal alien allegedly grabs school police officer’s gun, shoots him in femoral artery: DOJ
Previously Deported Illegal Alien Charged with Horrific Crimes Against Louisiana Child
One of the Left’s Favorite Podcasters Calls Christian Conservatives a ‘Cancer’ to America
Michigan student confronts El-Sayed over Iran stance in tense exchange: ‘Do you stand with us?’
NYC kitten rescue defends ‘NO F—ING MAGA’ adoption policy as PETA calls for it to be abolished
Soft-on-Crime DA Called ‘Bloody Mary’ Caught Trying to Toss Child-Killer’s Life Sentence Because It’s Just Not Fair
Tylenol murders mystery deepens after sheriff’s office solves decades-old ‘Unknown Wanderer’ cold case
Woke Liberal Busted Pretending to Be Palestinian Apologizes: ‘I Am a White Woman of Significant Privilege’
Local Virginia GOP chair says Arlington County officials prioritize illegal immigrants over public safety
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
