Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Democrats Push to Fly Spy Drones Over Your Property to Enforce Their Green Agenda, Punish Regulation Violators
Detroit judge, 3 others charged in alleged scheme to steal thousands from vulnerable and incapacitated people
Unearthed photo of Swalwell meeting with top CCP official raises alarm bells: ‘Very disturbing’
Lindsey Graham Holds Up Trump-Backed Bill to Crack Down on Sanctuary Cities
Clinton Contempt Vote Set for Next Week: Will Justice Be Served?
Epstein Helped Fund Lavish Lifestyle for Former Obama WH Counsel Who Gave Him Legal Advice
Salman Rushdie refuses to be ‘diverted’ by terrorism after surviving near-fatal stabbing attack
From Obama award to Minnesota op: Why Trump tapped Tom Homan for on-the-ground crackdown
House GOP majority on the brink as all-Democrat Texas special congressional election underway
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison Set to Testify Before Congress About Massive Fraud Allegations
Conservative group blasts LinkedIn for removing pro-ICE post, labeling it ‘hateful’
Famed filmmaker presses Democrats to put ‘citizen-led’ presidential primary first
He’s Not Joking: Jim Acosta Claims Don Lemon Was Arrested Because He’s Black
New Jersey governor to launch portal for uploading videos of ICE tactics: ‘They have not been forthcoming’
LAPD arrests violent agitators after protests erupt outside federal detention center in Los Angeles
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
