Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
JD Vance arrives in Switzerland to join Kushner and Witkoff for new round of Iran negotiations
Trump says much of water in Reflecting Pool likely to be drained: ‘Necessary repairs’
Pope Leo sends unmistakable message on immigrants during visit honoring America’s first saint
Former Olympian among those charged with vandalizing Reflecting Pool; Trump says basin must be drained: report
Obama Presidential Center follows widely-mocked ‘stolen land’ acknowledgment with Native American dance show
Children among 6 wounded in Maryland mass shooting as detectives work to determine what occurred
Manhunt underway for Kansas City shooting spree suspect near World Cup venue; FBI offering $25K reward
US Park Police arrest former Olympian for vandalism of Reflecting Pool
Obama Center embeds ‘Indigenous’ land message on controversial site
Dem who sued to remove Trump’s name from Kennedy Center now says venue becoming ‘lifeless husk’ in fresh fight
Biden scores temporary court victory as Trump-appointed judge delays release of Hur investigation materials
Breaking: Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Threatens End to Peace Talks
Explosive report unearths prominent union money trail labeled a ‘stunning betrayal’ of MAGA members
Soccer Fan Accuses Israel of Killing Palestinian Team, Pathetically Falls Apart After Learning Palestinians Slaughtered Israeli Team in 1972
Trump blames ABC reporter and vandals for peeling Reflecting Pool and algae growth
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
