Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Minnesota fraud cases, explained: How hundreds of millions allegedly slipped through state programs
Tim Walz to hold press conference on Monday amid rumors he will not run for reelection
Trump vows US ‘in charge’ of Venezuela as he reveals if he’s spoken to Delcy Rodríguez
Maduro and ‘Lady Macbeth’ Cilia Flores marriage spells ‘worst case’ custody scenario
Pilot dies alongside 3 nieces on wedding day in tragic Arizona helicopter crash
Off-duty deputy shot and killed while working security job in Texas, suspect apprehended
Trump and Musk share ‘lovely dinner’ at Mar-a-Lago after public feuding
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s narco case echoes US history of targeting alleged foreign drug kingpins
The Obama, Biden War on Coal Created an Energy Crisis: Trump’s Policies Are Already Fixing it
Trump issues direct warning to Venezuela’s new leader Delcy Rodríguez following Maduro capture
Now That’s a Low Blow: MTG Accuses Trump of Being a Fake Christian
Dems Push Beth Macy as the Liberal Answer to JD Vance, Say She’s ‘What Vance Could Have Been’
Bible Sales Skyrocket in 2025, Massive Spike Following Charlie Kirk’s Murder
American jailed for billionaire’s Monaco death, plot to kill wife exposed in long con, expert says
CNN Analyst: JD Vance Is Dominating the 2028 GOP Field and It’s Not Even Close
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
