Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Spanish prime minister promises to release all files on Ceuta invasion as thousands of illegal immigrants remain in enclave
Maria Bartiromo no longer with Fox News
Plane Carrying DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Forced to Make Emergency Landing
Lindsay Clancy Effect? Child, 2, Pronounced Dead, Mother Hospitalized in ‘Domestic-Related Homicide’ in Sleepy Suburb
Blue state governor candidate claims he ‘met Satan in person’ in resurfaced podcast episode
Mamdani gives influencers special access as Signal use raises records-law questions
Democrats in Close Midterm Races Keep Telling Kamala Harris to Stay Away
Lindsay Clancy Fans Start Sick TikTok Trend Pretending to Kill Their Babies
Minneapolis apartment shooting suspect was facing eviction: report
Powerful union leader backs Republican in key Senate showdown
Maduro claims immunity, asks judge to dismiss drug-trafficking charges against him and his wife
When gunman forced his way into Virginia elementary school, superintendent says lockdown procedures worked
Gloria Steinem, outspoken feminist leader, dies at 92
Newsom’s South Carolina trip doubles as test of Democrats’ rebuilding strategy
High School Football Hotshots Snub Opponents in Pre-Game Handshake, Get Taught a Lesson on the Field
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
