Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Longtime ‘Wheel of Fortune’ Announcer Suspended from Show Months After Commercial Flight Led to Police Probe
Newly Uncovered Arrest Records: Democratic Congressional Candidate Slapped Man at MLB Game, Swallowed Crack in Front of Cops
House GOP flexes campaign cash advantage with ad barrage after Supreme Court ruling
Platner’s replacement faces new Senate campaign headache tied to his son’s lobbying
US Mint releases commemorative Trump $1 coin for purchase
Should Trump build a White House ballroom? Americans weigh in
Republicans are at risk of losing the 2028 redistricting battle before it has even begun
Red Sox Announcer Issues Apology After Calling for On-Field Violence Against Yankees Star During Game
NJ mom fatally stabbed in Times Square during first week back at Bank of America after maternity leave
Times Square Stabber Is Eerily Similar to Leftist Heroes Lindsay Clancy and Luigi Mangione – Postpartum Depression, Dead Corporate Exec
White House highlights ‘steepest’ ever decline in US casualties from cartels amid boat strikes
Dem megadonor among 400 Jewish Michiganders labeled AIPAC insiders for denouncing El-Sayed’s leftist campaign
Judge raises stakes with pivotal ruling in Charlie Kirk assassination case and more top headlines
Nation’s largest teachers union under fire as controversial agenda puts century-old federal charter at risk
DeSantis endorses Florida GOP slate including Byron Donalds in governor’s race
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
