Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Psaki Hurries to Walk Back Calling Trump a ‘Predator’ on Live TV
Leading Senate Democrat tells Fox News ‘it’s time … for new leadership,’ as Schumer faces growing pressure
Meet the socialist Mamdani-style mayor just elected to run West Coast’s 5th largest city
Charlotte braces for federal immigration enforcement as murder rate rises 200% in uptown area
Mosaic Discovered at World’s Oldest Christian Worship Site Speaks of Divinity of Jesus
St Louis neighborhoods struggling to rebuild six months after tornado kills five
Newsom’s fight to stay relevant ahead of 2028 may be his toughest test yet
Mountains of paper to climb: House faces heavy backlog in bills thanks to shutdown
“Patriot Weekend” and counter protests of inflatable animals at ICE facility in Portland
Funniest Moments Between Trump and RFK Jr – President Has Quite a Sense of Humor
Michigan adopts sex education standards recommending students be taught gender identity, sexual orientation
Trump drops Marjorie Taylor Greene endorsement, calls her a ‘ranting lunatic,’ hints at backing primary rival
Charlotte promises to resist pending federal immigration raids: ‘Campaign of terror’
Zohran Mamdani tells 1M social media followers to boycott Starbucks amid ongoing worker strike
Antifa members indicted in Texas ICE facility riot, attempted murder of officer
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
