Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Breaking Report: Hollywood Legend Rob Reiner, Wife Michele Have Been Killed by Their Son Nick
Breaking: Two Dead Bodies Found at Hollywood Legend, Liberal Activist Rob Reiner’s LA Home
DoorDash driver charged with felony food tampering after alleged pepper spray incident goes viral
MTG Attacks Again, Blames Trump for Death Threats Against Her Son
Small Business Administration unveils new initiative to roll back federal regulations
Gavin Newsom Says Charlie Kirk Helped Him Better ‘Understand’ Christianity
China’s missile surge puts every US base in the Pacific at risk — and the window to respond is closing
In-N-Out Retires the Number 67 from Its Ordering System Over Viral ‘6-7’ Trend
Victim’s family breaks silence as Oklahoma teen in violent sex assault case avoids prison time: report
Trump addresses trio of attacks in Syria, Brown University, and Australia at White House Christmas event
‘You’re Not Answering’: Maher Goes Off After Leftist Guest Blames ‘Whitey’ for Islamic Oppression
Trump encourages Jewish Americans to ‘celebrate proudly’ during Hanukkah after deadly Bondi Beach shooting
Troy Aikman Blasts College Football NIL Chaos After Player He Paid Bolts Without Thanking Him
Ohio Doctor Indicted for Allegedly Drugging Pregnant Girlfriend with Abortion Pills
Oversight says DC police chief ‘undermined’ accuracy of crime data
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
