Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
The Tide Has Turned on DEI in Nearly Every Major Institution, But Teachers and Educators Refuse to Ditch It
Hawaii RNC members pay their way to represent state: ‘It’s not a cheap hobby’
Cruz back in Texas after photo of him boarding plane sparks backlash ahead of winter storm
‘I Went to Princeton and Harvard!’: Michelle Obama Complains About Being Known as ‘Barack Obama’s Wife’
Johnson warns House Republicans to ‘stay healthy’ as GOP majority shrinks to the edge
Navy Under Secretary Hung Cao says personnel discharged over vaccine mandate were ‘failed’
Pentagon plans to give South Korea primary role in deterring North Korea threats under new strategy
Minnesota ‘on the clock’ as HHS threatens penalties over childcare fraud scandal
Man who allegedly threatened to shoot ICE agents had rifles, body armor and ammo cache, feds say
RNC regroups and recalibrates for midterm election fight
Anonymous letter to California GOP chapter calls for war on ICE, urges agents be sent ‘home in a body bag’
Thousands march through Minneapolis, swarm Target Center demanding ICE removal from Minnesota
Christians Beaten, Abducted in Nigeria as Church Service Attacked, Prayer Books Desecrated, and Worship Instruments Broken
FBI Director Kash Patel hails transfer of Most Wanted fugitive Alejandro Rosales Castillo after Mexico arrest
GOP Rep. Releases Footage to Preemptively Crush Democrats’ ICE Detention Facility Stunt
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
