Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Somali fraudster convicted in Feeding Our Future scheme tied to recent recipient of Minnesota funding
DOJ says ‘no basis’ for civil rights investigation of Minneapolis ICE shooting
White House approves Nvidia chip sales to China despite bipartisan concerns in House
Democrats eye narrow path to capture Senate majority, but one wrong move could sink them
Kristi Noem faces impeachment effort in House as 70 Dems push obstruction of Congress charge
Venezuela Releases Imprisoned Americans in ‘Important Step in the Right Direction’
Trump eyes action on Greenland, setting up White House face-off with Denmark
Watch: ‘This Isn’t Seattle!’ – Cop Uses Painful Sternal Rub to Stop Non-Compliant Woman’s Fake Seizure and It’s Priceless
Tax fight puts California on collision course as billionaires leave for red states
Teachers union slams ‘Trump regime,’ claims ICE murdered Minneapolis agitator in message to supporters
Florida paraglider survives 500-foot plunge into ocean
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett Makes Troubling Concession to Transgender Activists During Oral Arguments
Trump administration projects united front as president weighs Iran options
House Republican recognizes transgender Dem Sarah McBride as ‘the gentleman from Delaware’
Trump signals long road ahead in Venezuela in his boldest interventionist move yet
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
