Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Judge Keeps Major Biden Admin Gun Rule On Ice
Fauci refuses Senate appearance after invoking Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in COVID probe
America Found A Rare Metal It Desperately Needs. Red Tape Could Keep It In The Ground For Ages
Trump backs Republican challenger to oust Letitia James amid ongoing mortgage fraud feud
Watch: It’s Been Banned a Million Times, But Now the Video That Exposed How ‘Queerness’ and Pedophilia Go Hand-in-Hand Is Online for Good
Bernie-backed California House candidate called DEI a ‘social justice-driven duty,’ embraced activist role
Advocate reveals freed Marine vet’s physical, mental torment in Russian prison as 5 Americans remain held
Report: Hollywood Stars Rethinking Getting Involved in Politics, Expert Says Voters ‘Tired of Celebrities Telling Them How to Think’
Court filings reveal Kyrsten Sinema had sex multiple times with married bodyguard while serving as senator
Justice Thomas reveals this elite institution is ‘off limits’ to him: ‘That’s the world we’re in’
‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ is a slog for the uninitiated
Military Identifies 2 Soldiers Killed in Texas Helicopter Crash Earlier This Week
Shooting Rocks University Campus as School Prepares for Classes to Resume
Companies Back Down After Red State AG’s Debanking Probe
He’s Baaaack: Platner Returns to Political Spotlight as His Replacement Deals with a Domestic Violence Allegation of His Own
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
