Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Fox News President Issues Defiant Response to Trump’s Criticism: ‘It’s What We Do’
Andrews says she doesn’t support gender surgeries for minors after previously advocating against a ban
Russia denies another plague case as WHO presses for more information
Taxpayer-funded autism giant faces scrutiny over abuse cases and billing as Trump targets healthcare fraud
Rally Crowd Chants ‘Where Is James Talarico’ as Senate Candidate Disappears from Campaign Trail for 11 Days
Letitia James’ underdog rival turns AG’s own playbook against her with scathing 52-count campaign ‘indictment’
Hillary Clinton issues endorsement in US midterm elections
Ithaca council halts Cornell event permits amid scrutiny over handling of rape allegations
Trump Responds After Two of His Top Advisers’ Foreign Work Sparks Backlash, Threatens Termination ‘If There’s a Conflict’
California woman accused of spying for China fights detention with $820K in proposed security
The Warning Signs Were There: Jelly Roll’s Comments About Zach Bryan Now Make All the Sense in the World
House Republican warns CBDC ‘communist money’ could lead US to ‘dystopian’ future
Lawsuit accuses Dearborn, Michigan, of being ‘hostile to Christians and Jews’ with Islamic displays
Wes Moore’s 2028 dodge complicates reelection pitch in Maryland
Former corrections officer accused of killing wife, forcing kids to help
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
