Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump says Venezuela has begun releasing political prisoners ‘in a BIG WAY’
Justice urges ‘stand up for our girls’ as Supreme Court weighs fate of his ‘Save Women’s Sports Act’
Who is Michael David McKee, the man accused of killing ex-wife and dentist husband in Ohio
Aurora terrorized by Venezuelan gang as dictator Maduro let Tren de Aragua seize power
ICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers
Woman Jailed After Gruesome Discovery Made in Light Bulb Box Buried in Back Yard
Pure Evil: Court Docs Claim Virginia Dem. Official Tried Getting Sexual Access to 9-Year-Old Boy… and then the Comments About Toddlers Started
One Agency Tried to Stop the Somali Welfare Fraud as Early as 2020, but Activists Used DEI to Intimidate It Into Silence
After Ayatollah Strikes Back at Trump and Says He’ll Fall From ‘The Peak of His Hubris,’ X Users Add Epic Community Note
Crowd-for-hire boss rejects Minneapolis unrest as illegal chaos
US military launches airstrikes against ISIS targets in Syria, officials say
State Department declares ‘international bureaucracies’ will no longer get ‘blank checks’ from the US
Four tankers that left Venezuela in ‘dark mode’ return as US eyes the country’s oil
Luxury Car Company Recalls Hundreds of Thousands of Cars Over Rearview Camera Defect
Trump signs order to protect Venezuela oil revenue held in US accounts
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
