Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Supreme Court rejects South Carolina’s bid to enforce transgender bathroom ban
Breaking: They’ve Got the Suspected Shooter – FBI Dir. Kash Patel Makes Announcement to the Nation
Jury seated in trial of man accused of Trump assassination attempt
Leading DC Democrats blast markup of proposed legislation as crime emergency nears expiration
Trump Should Award Charlie Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom Before the Week Is Out
House floor erupts in chaos after moment of silence for Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk dead after being shot at Utah Valley University event
Elon Musk pledges $1M to murals honoring Ukrainian refugee murdered in North Carolina
Decarlos Brown Jr. Speaks Out from Jail, Refuses to Accept Responsibility for Murder of Iryna Zarutska
Secret Service Under Fire After Radical Protesters Crash Private Dinner and Get Within Feet of Trump
Trump responds to Charlie Kirk shooting: ‘We must all pray’
Dems, GOP lawmakers join forces to condemn political violence after Charlie Kirk shot
Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event, hospitalized
Schumer to force Epstein files vote in Senate with NDAA amendment
Intercom CEO calls for ‘public execution’ of man accused of stabbing Ukrainian refugee
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
