Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
UK warns Iran is targeting ‘military sites’ as US and allies recognize growing threat of IRGC ‘hybrid activities’
Judge extends ban on tree removals at East Potomac Golf Links for two weeks
Young South Dakota deputy dies three days after being shot during a confrontation at a home
Lawyers for Charlie Kirk’s accused assassin Tyler Robinson want cameras banned after report on taxpayer burden
Watch: Katie Zacharia Begins Her First White House Press Briefing with a Message to Trump
GOP cuts bait on vulnerable Iowa representative one week after Johnson’s visit
Trump Speaks Out on Ilhan Omar Raid: ‘I Have Nothing to Do with It’
Dem making Senate comeback bid says he wouldn’t support a Trump impeachment push
Democrats’ fury over Ilhan Omar raid draws stinging GOP reminder about raid from the past: ‘Set the precedent’
Breaking: Kimberly Guilfoyle ‘Forever Grateful’ to Trump as She Resigns
Pope Leo XIV admitted to Gemelli Hospital for surgery to remove nodule from lung
Trump-linked super PAC pulls funding from 2 House Republicans as GOP fights to keep majority
Isaias aftermath brings arrests after suspects allegedly trick woman into letting them in car, store looted
911 operators questioned whether Christa Pike failed execution call was prank, audio reveals
On Same Day as Omar Raid, Trump Issues Dire Warning to Midterm Voters: Don’t Let Your State Get ‘Ransacked and Destroyed’ Like Minnesota
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
