Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump announces new ‘AI Force,’ vows to protect industry as AI czar announcement nears
LA homelessness fraud cases expose deeper problem than stolen millions, oversight hawk warns
Netflix Won’t Be Faithfully Adapting the Last ‘Narnia’ Book Any Time Soon: The Islamic-Seeming Villains Stage a Religious Takeover – Sound Familiar?
Cuba’s power grid collapses as US embargo pressures regime
Soros Prosecutor Dropped His Gun Charges: 1 Year Later, He Was Charged with Murder
Doxxed Holdout Clancy Juror Moved to Undisclosed Location for His Safety After ‘Black Republican’ Faces Backlash
Data Centers Are About to Burn More US Natural Gas Than Almost Every Country on Earth
Congressman Tom Barrett: ‘Being a socialist should disqualify him for people’s consideration in my district’
Philly serial killer probe could expose larger network behind apparent ‘snuff’ films, expert says
Lawyer says 250-foot Trump arch disrupts historic sightlines cherished by veterans seeking burial at Arlington
Missouri woman federally indicted over chilling death threats sent to Austin Metcalf’s family
Blue States with Powerful Teachers’ Unions Have Far Worse Reading Scores for Students Than Red States with Weak Unions
Republicans fear they have little to offer voters as Congress leaves town
China Throws Its Weight Around in America’s Backyard Over Taiwan Backing
Who is Bert Mizusawa The retired Major General challenging Sen. Mark Warner
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
