Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Alarming fraud trend puts small-town mosque with industry and foreign govt ties in focus: ‘Our motherland now’
Leavitt says Trump is defying midterm headwinds as he barnstorms country
Florida A&M University shooting leaves 12 injured, including 6 children, near football stadium
Op-Ed: Stalin Believed in Predestination – Just Not the Calvinist Kind
Obama makes the case for el Sayed and a Democratic Party that can disagree
Constitutional Attorney: If We’re Not Careful, the US Could End Up Like France
Ukraine’s Starlink restored as Elon Musk claims Kyiv violated terms of service ‘to kill people’
Breaking: ‘Explosion’ at Quaker Oats Factory Rocks Midwest City as Large Smoke Cloud Looms
Obama compares Trump’s White House renovations to ‘Saddam Hussein opening a Cheesecake Factory’ at Ohio rally
Trump’s go-to Michigan auto worker gets a job and the spotlight
Felon Accused of Shooting National Guardsman Slapped With Federal Charges
Hegseth Quietly Meets Netanyahu as Trump Weighs Massive New Iran Offensive
This Isn’t Want Dems Had in Mind: Cali’s Wealth Tax Plan Handed Billionaire Zuckerberg a Massive Pay Increase
Did He Forget About 9/11? Muslim Brotherhood-Connected El-Sayed Said US Was ‘A Lot More Safe’ Under INS
Second Amendment fight moves beyond guns with Supreme Court poised for big ruling
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
