Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Hackers tied to Iran breach FBI director’s personal email and post private images
Secret Service agent assigned to Jill Biden injured in ‘negligent discharge’ at Philadelphia airport
AOC says politicians, especially Democrats, should promise not to accept ‘AI money’
Sheridan Gorman’s university newspaper touts ICE tracker after freshman allegedly murdered by illegal alien
Movie Review: Hopeful Comedy ‘Home Delivery’ Delivers Heart, Laughs, and Free Admission for Expectant Mothers
Savannah Guthrie to return to Today show after absence
‘Maybe It Wasn’t a Bug…’ Internet Weighs In on Man Who Discovered He Could Access 7,000 Robotic Vacuums
Battleground Dem candidate linked public displays of faith to political violence in 2023 speech
Senate passes overnight bill to fund most of Homeland Security as fight nears end and more top headlines
Fetterman tells far-left prosecutor to ‘lighten up’ after threatening to arrest ICE agents over raids
FTC commissioner likens American Bar Association to ‘communist party’ over far-left advocacy
NHL’s Nashville Predators Unveil New LGBT Logo, and It Doesn’t Land the Way They Hoped
Just In: Trump’s Legacy Will Now Appear on All New US Currency
Sorely needed US housing supply expansion may run through 3D printed homes
Israel has recognized Somaliland. Will the US follow?
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
