Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Opinion: The Trump-Cuellar Disaster Proves Trump Is One of the Most Decent Presidents We’ve Had in Decades
Trump’s show business homecoming
Noah Baumbach’s paean to fallen stars
Christmas comes early for the Beatles completist
HUD launches civil rights investigation into Boston’s DEI housing policies over alleged racial discrimination
Mississippi governor orders release of man who served more than 10 years of illegal 15-year sentence
Invasive pest never before seen in North America threatens Texas food supply, officials warn
Trump grants ‘full pardon’ to Tina Peters after 2020 election interference conviction
Newsom says Trump is one of the ‘most destructive’ president of his lifetime: ‘This guy is reckless’
Black Lives Matter OKC leader charged with wire fraud, money laundering in alleged $3.15M embezzlement scheme
Viral footage shows DoorDash driver allegedly pepper-spraying customer’s food order during delivery
Trump announces pardon for Colorado clerk: ‘Simply wanted to make sure that our elections were fair’
Trump administration offers $5M reward for capture of fugitive Los Choneros gang leader
Minnesota investigation: The shadowy money system Somalis rely on — and terrorists can exploit
New Hampshire 6-year-old tests positive for cocaine, cannabis; mother faces multiple charges
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
