Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Watch: Radar Track Video Shows Hijacked Plane to Israel Plummeted as Middle Eastern Pilot Hijacked Plane
White House Releases 4-Point AI Accord Signed by Trump and Industry Leaders
Biden Afghan migrant program hit with 40% vetting failure rate: ‘Alarming’
Fox News Poll: Michigan voters split between El-Sayed and Rogers
South Carolina mom accused of knife attack on young children; 6-year-old may lose arm: sheriff’s office
Bass splits from progressive rival on Israel in LA mayoral race
Andy Burnham says ‘indications’ show Iran ‘played a part’ in Fairford air base terrorism scare and defends suspects’ release on bail
Chuck Schumer Orders Democrats to Block Bill That Aims to Force Data Centers to Cover Increased Energy Costs
Virginia Releases Illegal Alien Accused of Unthinkable Crimes Against Children – ICE Catches Him Anyway
EXCLUSIVE: State Department revokes over 250,000 visas in broad immigration vetting crackdown
‘Drug-dealing’ network shielded by blue states targeted in SCOTUS challenge
Blanche announces charges against 10 permanent residents accused of Minnesota voter fraud
Russia begins air campaign targeting Ukrainian energy grid with barrage against Kyiv power plants
Passengers from Flydubai plane arrive in Israel on rescue flight
Trump DOJ investigating Dem group in Texas after viral undercover video sparks massive uproar
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
