Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Alito rips race-based claim in high-stakes migrant protections case at Supreme Court
DHS scorches Pritzker’s ‘sanctuary’ state after child rapist on ICE detainer released
Trump talks to retirees in first outing since WHCA dinner shooting
GRAPHIC: Fed-up Scott Jennings Snaps, Takes Down Arrogant CNN Guest Who Gets Too Close for Comfort During Heated Debate
Shock Video: Suspicious K9 Had Cole Allen Locked Down Before Handler Pulled Him Away – Literally 2 Seconds Later Allen Made His Move
FBI, Secret Service probe Wisconsin brewery owner over free beer offer after alleged Trump killing attempt
MN governor race to replace Walz sees major shakeup as GOP contender ends campaign: ‘Don’t see a path’
Amazon explores ‘The Apprentice’ reboot with Trump Jr set for promotion: report
Damning Text Messages: Biden DOJ Lawyers Created Witch Hunt Targeting Catholic Nuns and Laughed About Hunting Them Down
FCC Chairman Clarifies Action Against ABC in Wake of Kimmel Controversy
Missing Republican state Senate candidate found dead in truck days after disappearance
Top school district put on notice as watchdog group threatens legal action over gender policy
Watch: Jasmine Crockett Claims She’s One of the Most ‘Powerful’ People in the Country, Slams Those Not ‘On the Same Level’
Time is running out for Virginia Supreme Court to decide on redistricting referendum
No Good Deeds Go Unpunished By Our European ‘Allies’ and Their Total Inaction
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
