Featured News Opinons

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not a ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.


The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.


California Man Pleads Guilty to Harassing Guthrie Family With Fake Ransom Notes
Samuel Alito Warns Mail-In-Ballot Ruling Leaves Giant Opening For Voter Fraud
Navy suspends search for sailor who went missing when helicopter went down in Arabian Sea
Manson murders allegedly tied to CIA mind control experiments: congressional testimony
Trump made money, bought up stock from crypto companies after his SEC dropped cases against them
Expert who fled Cuba warns of ‘vicious cycle’ that will lead to ‘communists in double digits’ in Congress
9/11 Museum CEO reflects on lasting impact of terror attacks as America marks 250th birthday
Before the Boston Tea Party, there were New Hampshire’s Pine Tree Riots
America’s 250th celebration in nation’s capital boosted by iconic automaker’s 2-week tribute to innovation
Trump set to deliver ‘historic’ speech celebrating America’s 250th anniversary
Paul Pelosi, 86, faces a hit-and-run charge after striking a parked car in Napa County: sheriff’s office
US celebrates its 250th birthday: PHOTOS
Library of Congress celebrates America 250 with massive birthday cake
America 250 around the world
Illegal immigrant truck driver charged in death of trooper who moved home to care for mom with cancer
See also  Thunderbirds to race cars: Inside Horsepower of America at the Great American State Fair

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter