Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
SCOTUS Climate Suit Could Devastate Family Farms, Give China and Russia an Edge: Expert
Ozempic Maker Teams Up with Big AI for New Drug Development
Texas voters have plenty to say about whether Lone Star State could turn blue
Irish PM rejects antisemitism concerns in Ireland amid dramatic vote over boycotting Israel game
Tim Tebow Announces He’s ‘Pausing’ Relationship with Christian Group Targeted by Liberal Reporter
Trump Terminates ‘Ridiculous’ Biden-Buttigieg EV Mandate with Sweeping New Fuel Standards
Trump’s Greenland obsession isn’t random. Here’s what’s at stake
Trump reaffirms ICE arrest policy after confusing guidance sparks alarm among agents
Disturbing Video: ‘One of the Most Horrific Things I’ve Seen’ – Journalists Disgusted as Illegal Nearly Drowns Toddler in Effort to Cross Border
Florida sex offender accused of babysitting-ad trap as police investigate potential interstate predator
China Isn’t Waiting for Permits: US Leaders Warn It’s ‘Quicker to Get a College Degree’ Than to Power America
Nonimmigrant visas in flux due to Trump administration fees
Lee Gilley’s Texas attorney ‘never had one like this’ as accused wife killer clings to Italian lifeline
The folksy Senate Republican in hot demand on the campaign trail
SCOTUS detention fight could unleash dangerous criminal migrants onto US streets, experts warns
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
