Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump-backed candidates score major boost from deep-pocketed AI Super PAC in upcoming primaries
How AIPAC’s spending strategy evolved, to the dread of anti-Israel Democrats and Republican detractors
Tulsi Gabbard honors wish of Gold Star wife to visit husband’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery
Trump flexes MAGA muscle in Texas Senate runoff clash between Cornyn and Paxton
Skydiver dies after midair collision with another jumper during group jump in Washington state
Dog accidentally fires shotgun, striking woman yards away during chaotic gas station stop
Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner embraces democratic socialism at Bernie Sanders rally in Portland
Jacob Frey criticized for remembering George Floyd on Memorial Day, six years after death sparked riots
Widow of ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle Hits Back Against Dem Senate Candidate for ‘Making Things Up’
Watch: Trump Sums Up Memorial Day Better and Quicker Than Any President in Living Memory – Just 9 Words
President Trump Explains Importance of Memorial Day in Rousing Speech: ‘The Ultimate Sacrifice’
Dem City Gave Muslim Group $35k and Didn’t Track How It Was Spent
Anti-ICE protesters clash with agents outside New Jersey detention center as Gov Sherrill denied entry
Lawmaker Convicted Under ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Law for Writing Pro-Marriage Pamphlet
Stomach Churning: Paragliding Woman Videos Herself Plummeting After Mid-Air Crash With Plane
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
