Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump says ‘proud American veterans’ will replace illegal immigrant truck drivers
Tim Scott floats Lindsey Graham’s sister as permanent successor
GLAAD Complains Over New Study Showing Movies Have Become Less Gay: ‘Our Stories are Disappearing’
Drunk wrong-way driver killed Mass. trooper after 9 drinks at bar, DA report says
Retired math professor charged after wife, an airline meteorologist, found shot dead: cops
House Democrats fracture badly over Massie amendment to cut $3.3B in US aid to Israel
Bill Maher Chides ‘Extreme’ NPR During Sitdown Interview with Far-Left Outlet: ‘I’m Surprised You Even Had Me On’
Harris calls for ICE probe after Maine shooting amid renewed ‘border czar’ criticism
Fetterman downplays GOP fundraising partnership and dodges reelection plans
Not a Single Democrat Showed Up to Wednesday’s Senate Hearing on Taxpayers Being Defrauded
Todd Blanche confirmation hearing turns to Smith bombshells: ‘Did Jack Smith read my emails?’
Even Under Trump, FBI Fights FOIAs That Would Show How Much Agency Paid Big Tech to Censor Conservatives
Powerful LGBTQ+ group’s endorsements could tank vulnerable Dems over radical youth trans agenda
Canadian woman accused of slapping Trump-supporting teen turned over to ICE
Lib Outlets Fall for Troll Jacob Wohl Again, Tout Nonexistent ‘MAGA Mess’ Because Rapper Wanting a Pardon Allegedly Got Scammed
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
