Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump sends troops $1,776 bonus checks, and Biden coal, in Christmas speech to nation
Lethal US strike sinks narco-terrorist vessel along major Pacific drug route, Pentagon confirms
Border Patrol chief, progressive mayor caught on camera in tense street showdown: ‘Excellent day in Evanston’
Federal employees in the hot seat as GOP senator pushes transparency proposal: ‘Historic opportunity’
Dramatic bodycam video captures moment suspected kidnapper is arrested after 40 years on the run
Barack and Michelle Obama Had Plans with the Reiners on the Night of Their Death
Ford Pays a $19.5 Billion Price After Realizing it Fell for Biden’s EV Scam
Statue of Little-Known Civil Rights Activist Replaces Robert E. Lee in U.S. Capitol
Breaking: Bongino Stepping Down as Deputy Director of the FBI
Nearly two-thirds of American voters back social media ban for kids under 16, Fox News poll shows
Trump set to address the nation in primetime White House speech as Americans report economic squeeze
DOJ should not have dropped Trump codefendant charges: Jack Smith
Trump unveils disparaging ‘Presidential Walk of Fame’ plaques under Biden and Obama portraits
Newly Declassified Emails Show FBI Desperately Wanted to Avoid Mar-a-Lago Raid, Begged Biden’s DOJ for Other Options, But Was Denied
Former Texas coach allegedly used AI document to groom teen with manipulation tactics: report
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
