Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Dem fundraising giant ActBlue rocked by allegations it misled Congress about foreign donations
US pilot rescued from downed F-15E fighter jet in Iran, search for second crew member ongoing
Don Lemon Teases His Presidential Run Depends on God, Who He Insists is Female: ‘If She Gives Me a Sign’
Feds charge illegal immigrant in Loyola student killing as attorney says prosecutors lack ‘faith’ in state
Breaking: Labor Report Blows Economists Away – 3 Times as Many New Jobs Added as Projected
WATCH: House Democrat gets unexpected response when he asks constituents about voter ID requirements
DHS preps deportation of alleged MS-13 gang member wanted for pastor’s murder in El Salvador
What B-52 bombers bring to the Iran fight and more top headlines
Trump’s $1 billion presidential library expected to dwarf all predecessors
‘Local independent’ outlet in Virginia pushing redistricting is owned by Democratic operatives
VP Vance to meet with Viktor Orbán in Hungary days ahead of foreign nation’s elections
Celebrity chef lashes out at Trump for changing the ‘rules’ the same year as America 250
Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it ‘slap in the face’ to SCOTUS
Artemis II crew describes life aboard Orion spacecraft on historic journey to the moon and back
Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt talk free thinking and faith at TPUSA college tour kickoff
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
