Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
China Orders Airlines Not to Take Deliveries of Boeing Planes
Fox News Digital’s Presidential 100 Days Quiz
Alex Soros in hot seat after left-wing outlet exposes what his dad’s network thinks of his online footprint
MSNBC Staffers Realize Something About Rachel Maddow’s New Boss: ‘He Could Have a MAGA Hat at Home’
Trump dodges endorsements in messy GOP Senate primaries
San Francisco tries to ditch its drug strategy, pushes for ‘recovery first’ plan
2028 auditions for Democratic presidential nomination kick off as blue-state governor visits key early state
Kennedy Center cancels LGBTQ+ Pride events to align with new priorities after Trump fired center’s leadership
Judge temporarily blocks Trump order ending collective bargaining rights for most federal workers
Prominent Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre dies by suicide
Virginia Giuffre, Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew accuser, dead at 41 by suicide: report
Ex-New Mexico judge, wife tried to hide evidence of illegal alien gangbanger, DOJ prosecutors say
Retired NYPD officer attacked in teen ‘gang assault’ after confronting them for harassing cab driver: report
JD Vance Has Perfect One-Line Response to Democrats Freaking Out About Arrest of Wisconsin Judge
States warned federal funding is in jeopardy if illegal immigrants are collecting unemployment benefits
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
