Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Blue state councilman mocked after claiming self-driving cars are ‘murdering’ pets: ‘Hide your cats’
Watch: Letitia James Has No Answer When Reporter Points Out Big Problem with Her Cornell Move
DNA Test Leads to Adopted Man Learning His Biological Father Is a Rock-and-Roll Legend
Watch: Reporter Narrowly Dodges ‘Murder Attempt’ While Filming Outside ‘Taxpayer Funded Drug Dealing Operation’
‘Cornell 7’ Case Turns Political as Kathy Hochul Gets Involved with Executive Order
FBI overhauls tech backbone to counter AI threats from foreign adversaries, reduce response times, Patel says
Gypsy Rose Blanchard’s partner, Ken Urker, found dead inside his Louisiana home: sheriff
Amazon expands Prime settlement payouts: Do you qualify?
Dems demanding Venezuela brief face State Department fury as senators leave town without answers
VA University in Legal Trouble After Trying to Take Control of Christian Student Groups but Ignoring Muslims
DOJ Considering Whether Prosecutor’s Office Committed Misconduct Against Nixon: Report
Obama judge halts Trump firing bid as decades-old legal authority tees up possible major reversal
Somali former aide to Minneapolis mayor sentenced in Feeding Our Future fraud case
Socialist streamer Hasan Piker faces fury after pressuring Talarico to enact far-left policy if elected
Pope Leo XIV says Vatican is renewing alliance with ‘artists and cultural institutions’ against AI
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
