Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Patriot or ‘Pathetic RINO’? Maverick Republican Thomas Massie trades ‘America First’ label for ‘America only’
Schumer Sneaks Midterm Election Trap into New Proposal to End Government Shutdown
School Cannot Force Students to Use Trans Pronouns, Federal Court Rules
Illegal immigrants allegedly offered WhatsApp ‘menu’ of women for sex trafficking ring
Suspected suburban jihadis fueled by social media, assimilation lapses in homegrown terror plot, expert warns
Progressive-backed candidate convicted in man’s killing wins city council election
Federal judge dismisses Boeing felony charges despite victims’ families opposition to $1.1B settlement deal
Meet the Gay Furry Socialist Dem Candidate Who Celebrated Charlie Kirk’s Murder and Loves 9/11
State Dept says G20 boycott tied to South Africa’s ‘government-sponsored discrimination’ against Afrikaners
Dems Lose It as Trump Appoints Anti-DEI Lawyer to Head Top Civil Rights Agency
Perception that Trump is going too far on immigration is flashback to Obama days
Appeals court says Texas can enforce drag show ban, suggests not all drag shows violate state law
Federal judge rules Trump’s Portland National Guard deployment unconstitutional in permanent injunction
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to a potential procedrual vote on an interim spending bill
Seattle robber bites off 88-year-old woman’s finger during violent robbery, police say
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
