Featured News Opinons

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not a ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.


The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.


SCOOP: White House rallies House GOP on Trump tariff plan in secret call
‘False’: Trump admin rebukes claims intel officials are frequently using Signal to send classified info
It’s Official: Liberation Day Is Here, And the List of Tariffs Is a MAGA Dream Come True
Kid Rock Confirms What Happened When Donald Trump Met Bill Maher: ‘Blew My Mind’
Supreme Court divided over state effort to defund Planned Parenthood
Planned Parenthood Attempts to Play Victim After Handing Out Sexually Explicit Books to 8-Year-Olds
Amazon Makes Surprise Bid to Buy Popular Social Media Platform Just Before Deadline: Report
Trump touts return of the ‘American Dream’ in historic tariff announcement
Boston DA considering criminal charges against ICE agent who arrested illegal immigrant during trial
Republicans celebrate decline in border arrests under Trump: ‘Ecstatic’
Tourist vanishes after leaving Utah airport to backpack in mountains
Watch: 17-Year-Old Aspiring Preacher Stuns ‘American Idol’ Judges with Gospel Song, Wins Rare Platinum Ticket
EXCLUSIVE: ‘Shady trial lawyer pipeline’ funneling millions to Democrats according to report
Trump Accuses 4 Republican Senators of Being ‘Unbelievably Disloyal’ Amid Tariff Bill Battle
Musk not leaving yet, wrapping up work on schedule once ‘incredible work at DOGE is complete’: White House
See also  Republicans celebrate decline in border arrests under Trump: ‘Ecstatic’

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter