Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Florida beach toll booth worker killed after driver rams structure before getting stuck in sand, sheriff says
Jared Kushner’s overseas luxury resort project faces anti-corruption investigation amid violent protests
Senate Democrats offer little support as Platner faces new sexting controversy: ‘Staying out of it’
Texas teens accused of using dating apps to lure young men into violent robberies that left one victim shot
Meet the Left’s Merchant of Hate
The Truth About Genocide in America: What North American Indians Were Doing to Each Other When Europeans Arrived
Trump administration names Rosario ‘Pete’ Vasquez to serve as next US Border Patrol chief
6 Years Ago This Week: Trump Rushed to WH Bunker, 60 Secret Service Members Injured During Leftist Riots
America Will Turn 250 in July as a Deeply Divided Country, But Our Spirit Remains Unbroken
Louisiana Passes Key Bill Letting Churches Protect Themselves from Leftist Protesters
The next frontier: Washington grapples with its latest space oddity
Soros-backed nonprofit accuses NJ Gov Sherrill of spreading ‘MAGA propaganda’ on ICE detainees
Fox News Poll: ‘Resilient discontent’ defines the US mood at 250th anniversary
Like Clockwork: MLB Annoys Fans After Going Gay Again for ‘Pride’ Month
Taxpayer-funded ‘Meth Mansion’ under fire as crime concerns mount around homeless campus
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
