Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Mamdani fires back at Netanyahu, calls Israeli leader ‘architect of horrific genocide’ ahead of UN visit
Florida AG accuses teacher of labeling student a ‘misogynist’ over ‘conservative views’: ‘She should be fired’
Harris keeps 2028 door open as she hits midterm campaign trail, warns ‘28 won’t matter’ without 2026
Takaichi and victim families make multifront plea for US to help Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea
‘Big Sister’ warning resurfaces as Massachusetts expands home visits after Clancy trial
White House Official Says Fox News and Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Have ‘Revealed Themselves for Who They Truly Are’
El-Sayed’s Trump-Backed Opponent Breaks with POTUS on Iran: ‘We Have to Bring Prices Down’
Kamala Harris says ‘attack on DEI is an attack on maternal care’ in appearance with El-Sayed
Netanyahu Sends Warning to Mamdani Ahead of Trip to NYC: ‘I’m Gonna Tell the Truth About You’
Trump Attempts to Officially Give AI a New ‘Much More Accurate’ Name During UN Address
Chuck Grassley doesn’t rule out investigating Trump Jr.’s Russian-funded wedding party
From Austin to New York, pro-China network fuels week of anti-US protests as Xi meets Trump
No Wonder Dem Don’t Want to Give up Voter Rolls: DHS Investigating 300K Cases for Voter Fraud, Thanks to States’ Voter Rolls
European Union Chief Seeks to Add Canada in Unprecedented Shot at Trump
Breaking: ICE Nabs Dem Staffer Who Is Former News Anchor in Airport Operation
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
