Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Fetterman Draws a Red Line on What Would Cause Him to Quit the Democratic Party
Retiring GOP Sen. Tillis Vows to Block SAVE America Act Any Way He Can: ‘I Will Use Every Device’
Details of Todd Blanche’s behind-the-scenes meeting with Angel Mom revealed after Capitol Hill testimony
FBI investigating after ICE headquarters in Phoenix riddled with gunfire
Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’
Troy Jackson, an anti-corporate Maine Senate hopeful, touts endorsements from lobbyists
Intruder Storms ‘Today’ Show Set and Attacks Host
Trump says Josh Shapiro ‘doesn’t have what it takes’ as he moves to define him before 2028
Alleged Feeding Our Future fraud ringleader transferred from Somalia to face US charges
Insurance companies put on notice for stranding trans patients who want to reverse surgeries
GOP’s $95B defense package survives critical hurdle amid fiscal hawk revolt
Blue Angels flyover ignites social media; Hegseth, Eric Trump respond
FCC Set to Rule Against ‘The View’: Report
Navy Launches Investigation After Low Airshow Flyover Causes Chaos on the Ground
Bessent invokes assassination attempt ‘2 hours after being sworn in’ in dramatic brushback of leftist threat
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
