Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Illegal immigrants allegedly ran multi-million-dollar gift card fraud scheme hitting stores daily across Texas
Gen. Flynn Sends Blistering Request to Trump: ‘We The People Demand Accountability!’
Trump Admin Stands Firm After Jesus-Centric Christmas Messages Spark Media Freak-Out
Trump tears up Obama-era Latin American policy with renewal of Monroe Doctrine
Tennessee officers rescue woman considering jumping from bridge on day after Christmas
Ilhan Omar disclosures show husband’s companies surged in value as Minnesota reels from $9B fraud
Top Female Tennis Player Takes on No. 671 Man in ‘Battle of the Sexes’ – It Wasn’t Even Close
‘America first’: Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray launches House bid
Trump Signals Military Hit First Target Inside Venezuela After Finding Drug Facility: ‘We Knocked That Out’
China surrounds Taiwan with warships, fighter jets in largest military drills on record
Missing 19-year-old Camila Mendoza Olmos believed to be ‘in imminent danger,’ Texas sheriff says
Manhunts across America in 2025: Five cases that left cities, campuses and towns on edge
5 pivotal 2026 Senate races will determine whether Republicans maintain governing trifecta under Trump
FBI Foils New Year’s Eve Terror Plot by ‘Pro-Palestinian’ Group in California: Officials
Trump stress-tests Thune’s Senate majority with record-breaking year
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
