Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Duke Law’s alleged race-based admissions accused of defying Supreme Court ruling: DOJ
US Army offering defense firms ‘concierge access’ to test weapons at military ranges
Blanche Appears Poised for AG Confirmation as GOP Senator Announces Support
10 Democrats and Rand Paul oppose Russia sanctions bill
Democrats Furious as Trump Signs Two Executive Orders to End Birth Tourism
Maryland’s lone congressional Republican blasts Moore’s redistricting push as alleged 2028 White House play
Fraternal Order of Police slams vulnerable House Democrat for using logo in constituent mail
Woman Sues Yankees for $10 Million After Scary Incident at Game
Counterterrorism expert warns Abdul El-Sayed Senate bid raises homeland security concerns
Don Lemon moves to dismiss case over Minnesota church protest on selective and vindictive prosecution claims
Humiliation for Ireland: Famously Anti-Israel State’s New ‘Air Force One’ Can’t Always Land Safely After They Banned Jewish State’s Technology
Nancy Guthrie investigators see uptick in tips after ransom notes release: Sheriff
Alex Murdaugh demands new evidence search in hunt for cracks in case
Blanche’s Attorney General Confirmation Hanging in the Balance After 2nd Republican Announces Opposition
Mother of Slain Citadel Cadet Speaks Out After Repeat Criminal Is Arrested for His Murder
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
