Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
CAIR spins anti-Israel narrative about Somali fraud as scrutiny grows
Drug kingpin El Chapo’s son enters plea in multibillion-dollar drug trafficking case
US escalation with Maduro halts deportation flights to Venezuela
DHS reveals Illegal alien behind fatal crash was given license by deep blue state
Mamdani taps disgraced activist who said ‘one day we can abolish police’ to key public safety committee
Noem calls for ‘full travel ban’ on countries ‘flooding’ US with immigrants after DC attack
Democrats open inquiry into Patel’s use of FBI jet
USDA Puts ‘ALL’ Programs Under Review, Will Ensure Only American Citizens Receive Food Stamps
Watch: Karoline Leavitt Uses New York Times Reporter’s Past Work to Crush Latest ‘Fake News’ Story on Trump
Quadruple Murderer Kohberger Complains About Prison Bananas, Gets the Response He Deserves: ‘Deal With It’
ICE arrests two illegal immigrants convicted of ‘heinous’ crimes against children in New Jersey and Texas
Watch: Trump Gives Touching Tribute to Deceased, Wounded Guard Members During WH Christmas Party
Indiana Republicans Release New Congressional Map That Could Flip Multiple Seats Red
House unanimously approves barring anyone tied to Hamas’ Oct 7 attack from entering US
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump admin ‘re-examining’ all Afghans imported after DC shooting
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
