Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Reagan National Airport makes drastic change following deadly 2025 midair collision
Watch: Little League Coach Declares, ‘Jesus Is Still Lord’ Live on ESPN
El-Sayed’s half sister offered Oct 7 ‘blessing,’ one year after Hamas attack: ‘Allahu Akbar’
President Trump claims AOC, far-left Democrats are backing away from controversial positions
EXCLUSIVE: Kennedy Center board moves to name grounds ‘President Donald J Trump Plaza’
Netanyahu mocks UK as ‘Islamic Republic of Britain’
Trump Was Right All Along About Democrats’ Late-Term Abortion Agenda
Brave widow of slain UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson comes face to face with Luigi Mangione for first time
Houston police shoot gunman who indiscriminately fired on vehicles, injuring a mother and daughter
CNN’s Scott Jennings is Too Talented for the Network – Which is Why He Should Replace Karoline Leavitt
Exclusive: RNC Condemns DNC Vote to Abolish ICE – Party Has Been Overtaken by Socialists
GSA finds China-made tech labeled ‘Made in USA’ in federal procurement program, orders sweeping review
Darline Graham Nordone nabs Senate runoff endorsement from ex-primary rival Russell Fry
Danish PM calls migrants with ‘Islamic background’ the greatest threat as Europe braces for second migrant wave
‘Raw material for election fraud’: Expert flags voter-roll problems far beyond one state
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
