Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Hegseth Takes House Dem to the Woodshed for Pushing Iranian ‘Propaganda’ at Hearing: ‘Shame on You!’
Minnesota ‘tried to cover up fraud allegations,’ former state trooper alleges
Class and Decency: Watch Johnny Carson Address Reagan Assassination Attempt the Day After It Happened
Bodycam shows dad bolt from cops with young child in his arms before ditching her alone in the woods
Trump DOJ report lays bare Biden administration’s alleged anti-Christian bias
WATCH: Chaos erupts as Florida Dem in pink jumpsuit grabs bullhorn mid-vote: ‘It’s illegal!’
Dem Rep Who Resigned in Disgrace Over Federal Charges Quietly Made Move to Run Again Before Quitting: Reports
David Allan Coe, Outlaw Country Legend Behind ‘Take This Job and Shove It,’ Dies at 86
Biden IRS discriminated against Christian groups, DOJ report finds
Federal appeals court refuses to rehear Trump appeal of $83M E Jean Carroll defamation judgment
Hunter Biden’s ex-lawyer ordered to pay $50K to former Trump aide after harassment claims crumble
Graham urges Trump to ‘ignore’ war powers deadline as GOP grapples with Iran
Cultural groups ask federal judge to halt Trump’s renovations of Kennedy Center
Georgia man says he suffered severe medical neglect leading to amputations at scrutinized Atlanta jail
LAPD chief warns Los Angeles not prepared to secure 2028 Olympics due to staffing shortages
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
