Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
DC pipe bomb suspect says someone needed to ‘speak up’ about stolen election claims
Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes Trump’s meetings with Zelenskyy, Netanyahu: ‘Can we just do America’
Tim Walz pushes back on Minnesota fraud allegations following viral daycare video
Ilhan Omar’s Somaliland stance slammed as Minnesota fraud scandal deepens
Trump, Zelenskyy say Ukraine peace deal close but ‘thorny issues’ remain after Florida talks
ICE delivers ‘greatest gift of all’ with Christmas arrests of convicted criminals across multiple states
Major cities see violent crime surge as national rates plummet significantly in 2025: survey
Deadly helicopter collision in New Jersey kills one, critically injures another
Is This Legal?: Leftist Group Recruits Military Officials to Turn Against Trump’s Drug Cartel Strikes
FBI surges resources to Minnesota as Patel calls $250M fraud scheme ‘tip of iceberg’
‘Worst of the worst’: The 10 most violent illegal immigrants nabbed in 2025
Brits Weighed In on Whether Die Hard Is a Christmas Movie – Do You Agree with Them?
‘We are not afraid’: Erika Kirk vows TPUSA will continue campus debates nationwide
Crockett Flies Into a Rage Over Vance’s ‘Street-Girl Persona’ Comments
Unsung heroes of 2025: First responders and everyday Americans who saved lives across US
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
