Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Israel Strikes Inside Iran After ‘Fanatical Regime’ Targets Residential Areas with Missiles
Major Defense Contractor Unveils New Tech to Stop Drone Swarms
‘Auramaxxing’: How the Trump administration is beautifying DC ahead of America 250
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani says the Democratic Party ‘lost its focus on working people’
Why Trump picked Bill Pulte to lead US intelligence as critics question his qualifications
Leftist Seattle Mayor Walks Back Criticism of Major Company After It Starts Shifting Jobs to Nashville
Illegal Alien Gets Into Car Crash Near Another Illegal Alien Getting Arrested
Noncitizens on voter rolls in Democrat-run state exposed as RNC chair pledges secure elections
Walz administration ignored fraud warnings as billions vanished, House oversight report alleges
Walz administration used outside investigators to punish whistleblowers, oversight committee finds
Karmelo Anthony trial consumed by race and self-defense, but hidden hurdle could be key: expert
Raman overtakes Spencer Pratt in razor-thin race, AP count shows, but race remains uncalled
Spencer Pratt falls behind Nithya Raman in LA mayoral race after latest vote update
Video captures fireworks exploding from burning trailer that shut down Interstate 75
Multiple people stabbed near Penn Station, leaving one seriously injured as investigation continues
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
