Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Florida sheriff welcomes New Yorkers after Mamdani win: ‘It can be the beginning of a new life’
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: New York’s new mayor leaves city’s Jewish community terrified
House conservatives back new funding deal to end shutdown, reject ‘wasteful’ Obamacare subsidies
Law students eager to fight corrosive campus ‘cancel culture’ spreading nationwide
As Left Celebrated Predictable 2025 Victories, Dem Rep Made 2026 Move That Indicates How Party Will Fare in Midterms
Bombshell: James Comey’s NY Prosecutor Daughter Offered Epstein Freedom if He Would Implicate Trump in Sex Crimes, Cellmate Claims
Obama’s DOJ laid the groundwork for the politicization Democrats now decry
New Jersey election post-mortem: What caused Ciattarelli and other GOP losses?
Dems Successfully Ran Against Reagan in First Off-Year Elections, But Then the Economic Boom Took Hold
Effective Altruism-linked nonprofit placed fellows in key government offices, secured influence
Michigan State University partially reverses policy on co-ed community bathrooms after complaint
MTG denies reports she’s eyeing presidential run in 2028
Chinese scholars charged with smuggling biological materials into US under research cover
Apple says Cammack bill would undermine children’s online safety
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum presses charges after being groped in street
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
