Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Tyler Robinson judge unseals ATF report in assassination of Charlie Kirk
Senate Candidate James Talarico Reports Eye-Popping Fundraising Haul – But We’ve Seen This From Democrats Before
Frat house turns into crime scene after member allegedly sexually assaults woman, police say
Breaking: Former Lt. Governor of Virginia and His Wife Found Dead
Didn’t file your taxes on time? Here’s what a tax expert says you should do next
Republicans bet higher tax refunds will boost midterm chances as blue states resist relief
S&P 500 Smashed Another Record Wednesday, Signaling the Markets Believe Trump That the Iran Conflict Is Ending
Democrats vow to block next Trump Supreme Court pick amid Alito speculation
Democratic Rep. Calls to ‘Eliminate the President of the United States from the Office Right Now’
Homeland Security official’s killing leaves agency ‘devastated’ as vetting breakdown exposed
Swalwell’s mounting sexual misconduct allegations threaten career beyond politics, experts warn
Trump Admin Moves to Wipe Out the Last Remaining Convictions from January 6, Specifically Regarding Proud Boys and Oath Keepers
Virginia redistricting referendum tightens into a dead heat as early voting surges
2 detained after shooting in New York leaves 15-year-old killed, two others wounded: police
Guards at ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ beat, pepper-sprayed detainees, lawyer says
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
