Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Trump and Cabinet officials welcomed by Xi at China’s Great Hall of the People
CIA Accused of Raiding Tulsi Gabbard’s Office Seizing JFK, MKUltra Documents Set for Declassification
Trump’s upbeat China message collides with deepening Beijing rivalry
China rolls out red carpet for Trump as Xi meeting tests trade, Taiwan tensions
AG aims to retry Alex Murdaugh ‘quickly’; both sides enter courtroom chess match with each other’s game plans
California death row inmates watching porn on taxpayer-funded tablets, evading security controls: report
It never ends: GOP moves to fund border, Democrats blast Trump spending
Howard Lutnick testified he saw Epstein’s massage table as ‘sexual in nature’ during 2005 visit
Video: Ex-Trans Speaker Postpones TPUSA Speech as Antifa ‘Militia … on Cross-Sex Hormones’ Threatens Violence Cops Weren’t Prepared for
Vance turns up heat on states with federal cash threat over Medicaid fraud crackdown
JD Vance’s Fraud Task Force Makes California Pay $1.3 Billion Price for Defrauding Taxpayers
Poll: Thomas Massie Trailing Trump-Backed Primary Challenger After Leading Big Just Weeks Ago
CIA Furious as Active Agent Testifies on Fauci’s Enormous Role in COVID ‘Cover-Up’
Children’s book author sentenced for husband’s poisoning death as judge calls her ‘too dangerous’
Arrest of gang member convicted of murder puts Dem state’s sanctuary policies on blast
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
