Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Op-Ed: I’ll Believe it When I See it – How Liberal Santa Scams the Nation
Minnesota Senate candidate wears hijab in visit to Somali market as fraud scandal unfolds
As UK Locks Up Citizens for Speech, Jimmy Kimmel Shares Christmas Message with Them About Trump’s So-Called ‘Fascism’
Most radical courses, curriculum that received federal funding in 2025
Trump Sends Room Into Roaring Laughter Responding to Kid Who Didn’t Want Coal for Christmas
Booker says Gabbard ‘endangering’ NJ with remarks on radical Islam, heavily-Muslim city; deputy responds
Kentucky congressman announces death of longtime aide and campaign manager
JonBenet Ramsey case could benefit from new DNA technology as police renew commitment
Unreliable: The Epstein Tipster Claiming Trump Was a Rapist Also Claimed a Man Fired by Hillary Clinton Tried to Frame Him for the 1995 OKC Bombing
Trump launches Christmas night airstrikes in Nigeria and more top headlines
Trump matches Biden’s first year of US attorney nominees despite high-profile setbacks
House lawmakers reflect on their memorable moments in Congress
Trump Announces Christmas Day Strikes on Islamic Terrorists Involved in Nigerian Christian Genocide
Nebraska grandfather killed in ‘freak accident’ at McDonald’s drive-thru
Ultra High Level Democrat Influencer Calls for Violence Against ‘Dead Man Walking’ Trump on Christmas Eve – Calls on People to ‘Put Him to Sleep’
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
