Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Zelenskyy says peace deal is close after Trump meeting but territory remains sticking point

Lapsed Epstein deadline underscores challenge of reviewing troves of files in 30 days

Swalwell slammed by Border Patrol commander over imagery showing ICE raiding Jesus Christ’s manger

Netanyahu says Trump to become first non-Israeli to receive Israel Prize

Home Owned by NASCAR Star Denny Hamlin Destroyed in Deadly Blaze

Look for Times Square Crystal Ball To Do Something Different This Year As USA’s 250th Birthday Approaches

Illegal immigrants allegedly ran multi-million-dollar gift card fraud scheme hitting stores daily across Texas

Trump rebukes Ukraine after Putin says his home was attacked

Gen. Flynn Sends Blistering Request to Trump: ‘We The People Demand Accountability!’

Jan. 6 pipe bomb suspect fights DOJ delay in turning over evidence

Trump Admin Stands Firm After Jesus-Centric Christmas Messages Spark Media Freak-Out

Trump tears up Obama-era Latin American policy with renewal of Monroe Doctrine

Tennessee officers rescue woman considering jumping from bridge on day after Christmas

Ilhan Omar disclosures show husband’s companies surged in value as Minnesota reels from $9B fraud

Top Female Tennis Player Takes on No. 671 Man in ‘Battle of the Sexes’ – It Wasn’t Even Close

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”