Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Israel’s Arab parties choose between ‘bad and even worse’ as they back Gadi Eisenkot over Netanyahu to form government

Ten-term Republican congressman loses to Shannon Taylor in Virginia’s 1st District

LePage’s Maine House race heads to ranked-choice voting

Breaking: UK Court Convicts Russell Brand of Rape, Star is Headed to Prison

Harmeet Dhillon resigns as Justice Department’s assistant attorney general for civil rights: sources

Alito reiterates he’s not retiring, is committed through end of current Supreme Court term

Body Language Expert Watched El-Sayed’s Smiley Victory Speech, Suggests Revenge Lurked Underneath

Khanna touts new draft committee for likely 2028 presidential bid: ‘I’m honored’

Watch: El-Sayed Supporters Celebrate Win with a Chant That Reveals Their True Priorities

Republican AGs stand ready as ‘last line of defense’ against leftist policies after dismal midterms for party

Watch: CNN Anchor Slips Up and Makes a Telling Admission While Gleefully Reporting Midterm Results

Ted Cruz delivers scathing assessment after far-left Dems sweep midterms and more top headlines

White House official details what gets Trump’s attention in intelligence briefings

Democrats already recruiting oversight staff as left-leaning law firms gear up for Trump investigations

17 years after Fort Hood massacre, victims’ families grapple with gunman’s looming execution

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”