Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Colorado House advances conversion therapy lawsuit bill; GOP lawmaker calls it ‘slap in the face’ to SCOTUS

Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt talk free thinking and faith at TPUSA college tour kickoff

Karoline Leavitt reveals ‘anti-climatic’ way Trump told her she’d be press secretary: ‘Oh, by the way’

Trump slaps up to 100% tariff on some brand-name drug imports in major America First push

Two arrested in NC after police find 13-year-old kept in dog kennel, 5 other kids in ‘filthy’ home

Heart-pounding video shows fisherman leaping into ocean to save great white shark

Pete Hegseth signs memo opening door for troops to carry personal firearms on bases

Florida, Mississippi join wave of states tightening voter citizenship rules

Trump Announces Plan to Help DHS Workers in Spite of ‘Radical Left’ Shutdown

Trump 2027 budget preview hints at sweeping scale-up in core agenda

Report: The Last Straw That Led to Trump Firing Pam Bondi Had to Do with Eric Swalwell

Gradual erosion of confidence led to Pam Bondi’s abrupt ouster

FBI Warns Congress of ‘Major’ Cyber Hack Involving China That Could Threaten National Security

NASA Launch Shows Americans Are Rejecting Basic Facts, And That Should Concern Everyone

ActBlue’s lawyers said it may have misled Congress on foreign donations: Report

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”