Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened

Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms

Trump warns judge against sacrificing national security by blocking White House ballroom, drone base

Why NATO’s defense spending imbalance lasted for decades

Trump expands Turkey ambassador’s diplomatic role, adding Iraq, Syria amid Middle East tensions

Does China Have The Upper Hand?

NHL Legend Hangs Himself: Report

Graham Platner’s wife campaign video statement responding to infidelity allegations widely panned by critics

Agitators outside Delaney Hall set up organized logistics operation before Newark protests began

Leftists Host Striptease Fundraiser to Support Antifa Terrorists Behind Shooting at ICE Detention Facility in 2025

Arizona school board member gets backlash after mocking board president with Nazi salute

Trump calls on all future candidates to take cognitive exam, noting perfect score during latest physical

Infected Lab Monkey Bites Government Employee in the US, GOP Senator Demands Investigation

FBI hunts most wanted neighbor next door who allegedly faked cancer, scammed loved ones for luxury getaways

E. Jean Carroll is a mess for the administration that won’t go away

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”