Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Video captures chaos erupting at NYC vigil for slain Ayatollah Khamenei as punches fly

Judge to allow sex offender to question witnesses in Virginia locker room case

California Rep. Darrell Issa to retire, endorses Jim Desmond to succeed him

Trump says US ‘doing very well’ in Iran nearly 1 week into joint action against Tehran

Biden says ‘I’m a h— of a lot smarter than most of you’ to crowd at Jesse Jackson’s funeral

NYC Reportedly Put Aside $400M for Dozens of ‘Ghost’ Schools that Never Opened

Emergency landing ends in tragedy as plane crashes on New Mexico golf course

US military carries out targeted strike on alleged narco-terrorist network in Ecuador

Trump Confirms He Will Withhold Endorsing Cornyn Until SAVE Act is On His Desk – He Also Makes Another Demand

Man accused of Iran-backed Trump assassination plot compared his plan to Butler shooting: FBI

ICE Arrests Illegal Alien in Idaho for Allegedly Trafficking Children Into State as Laborers

Miami developer accused of $85M fraud scheme, blowing investor cash on yacht, Rolex

Spanberger lashes out at Pentagon after Hegseth pulls colleges’ support over woke ‘ideologies’

Illegal Alien Charged With Fraudulently Voting in Crucial Swing State During 2024 Election

Florida Bar denies investigation into ex-US Attorney Lindsey Halligan

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”