The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.
The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.
The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).
However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”
That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”
Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:
US Kill Total on Drug Boats Hits 133 as Strike Takes Out 3 More ‘Narco-Terrorists’ in Caribbean
Trump announces $5 billion pledge in Gaza aid from Board of Peace members
Mobs in India Destroy Christian Homes After Believers Refuse to Renounce Jesus
Rubio defends US operation in Venezuela, calls out reporter for trying to start a fight
Columbia pulls promotion for DHS career expo after faculty claims university is aiding ‘authoritarianism’
UN Head Sends Congratulations to Iran on Anniversary of 1979 Revolution – Weeks After Muslim State Slaughtered Thousands of Its Own Citizens
NY Man Sentenced After Offering Cash and Bottle of Wild Turkey Bourbon for the Murder and Gruesome Disposal of Romantic Rival’s Body
Democrats say Trump redistricting push backfiring as Virginia advances new House maps
Hundreds of women pledge loyalty to ‘Deadpool Killer’ despite brutal double murder confession
Chicago-area teacher breaks silence after losing job over 2-word Facebook post supporting ICE: ‘Devastating’
Reuters Goes Out of Its Way to Brand Male Trans Mass Shooter a Woman
Watch: The Moment Paul Rudd Schools Young Co-Stars on Jesus, the Fact That He’s Real, and How Rudd Wants to Meet Him
AG Pam Bondi announces ‘all’ Epstein files have been released, listing over 300 high-profile names
Hillary Clinton says migration ‘went too far’ and ‘needs to be fixed in a humane way’
Thousands rally in Munich against Iran regime before second round of nuclear talks
On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.
…
I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.
…
Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.
The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”
US Kill Total on Drug Boats Hits 133 as Strike Takes Out 3 More ‘Narco-Terrorists’ in Caribbean
Trump announces $5 billion pledge in Gaza aid from Board of Peace members
Mobs in India Destroy Christian Homes After Believers Refuse to Renounce Jesus
Rubio defends US operation in Venezuela, calls out reporter for trying to start a fight
Columbia pulls promotion for DHS career expo after faculty claims university is aiding ‘authoritarianism’
UN Head Sends Congratulations to Iran on Anniversary of 1979 Revolution – Weeks After Muslim State Slaughtered Thousands of Its Own Citizens
NY Man Sentenced After Offering Cash and Bottle of Wild Turkey Bourbon for the Murder and Gruesome Disposal of Romantic Rival’s Body
Democrats say Trump redistricting push backfiring as Virginia advances new House maps
Hundreds of women pledge loyalty to ‘Deadpool Killer’ despite brutal double murder confession
Chicago-area teacher breaks silence after losing job over 2-word Facebook post supporting ICE: ‘Devastating’
Reuters Goes Out of Its Way to Brand Male Trans Mass Shooter a Woman
Watch: The Moment Paul Rudd Schools Young Co-Stars on Jesus, the Fact That He’s Real, and How Rudd Wants to Meet Him
AG Pam Bondi announces ‘all’ Epstein files have been released, listing over 300 high-profile names
Hillary Clinton says migration ‘went too far’ and ‘needs to be fixed in a humane way’
Thousands rally in Munich against Iran regime before second round of nuclear talks
How many Pulitzer prizes have gone to essays that have had to subsequently publicly correct one of their core claims? Or been challenged by every major historian in the field, right and center and left?
— Andrew Sullivan (@sullydish) May 4, 2020
The Times also shared a Pulitzer Prize in 2018 for its reporting on the “Russia collusion” narrative, which was later disproven (albeit reluctantly) by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election.
In August 2019, Times editor Dean Baquet told the newsroom that the newspaper intended to shift its coverage from Russia to race. With the collapse of Russia conspiracy theories, which the Times had used to attack President Donald Trump from the day of his inauguration, the paper needed a new narrative. The 1619 Project is the centerpiece of that new narrative — with Trump, implicitly, the inheritor of America’s racist past.
The Pulitzer Prize committee described Hannah-Jones’s essay as “sweeping, deeply reported and personal.” The Poynter Institute, which lists George Soros’s Open Society Foundations as a major funder, also gushed over Hannah-Jones’s essay, calling it “nearly impossible, and almost insulting, to try and describe in a handful of words or even sentences.”
Yet two corrections — technically, one “correction” and one “editors’ note” — below the essay suggest that while perhaps heartfelt, the prize-winning piece is also, fundamentally, wrong about American history.
Story cited here.
