Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

‘You Should Be Ashamed’: Trump Unleashes on CBS’ Norah O’Donnell Over Question About WHCD Gunman

German chancellor says US is being ‘humiliated’ by Iran

Virginia redistricting ballot amendment faces tense questioning from state Supreme Court

Republicans rush to green light White House ballroom following third Trump assassination scare

Supreme Court hands GOP a redistricting win by striking down lower court block on Texas map

‘One-Door’ Welfare Policy Is a One-Way Street to Welfare Fraud

White House Correspondents’ Dinner Attendees Pinpoint Troubling Security Lapse: ‘We Are Lucky This Wasn’t Far Worse’

Iran Proposes Deal That Would End the War, But Leave the Central Issue Unresolved

DNC vice chair attacks Democratic Sen. John Fetterman: ‘You’re a mess’

DOJ cites White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting in push to drop lawsuit against ballroom

North Dakota state rep, pilot killed in plane crash

What we know about the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting suspect and more top headlines

Fox News Reporter Describes Experiencing Chaos on Stage During Trump Assassination Attempt

Another Eight Nigerian Christians Killed in Coordinated Attacks

Mamdani’s racial equity plan a hidden ‘moving the goalposts’ ploy to justify massive gov expansion: expert

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”