Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Former President Bill Clinton deposed in Epstein probe in potential first for Congress

Austin shooting suspect wore Iranian flag shirt during attack, sources say

Over 50 arrested as anti-ICE protesters allegedly hurl rocks at Minneapolis officers during demonstration

‘Road rage incident’ turns deadly as Virginia highway stabbing leaves 2 people dead; dog also killed

Parents Get Enormous Payout After School Forces Kids to Read LGBT Books

House Republicans push Johnson to go to war with Senate over SAVE Act

CNN Blames Trump as Looming Mega Sale Has Staffers ‘Freaking Out’

CNN Announces ‘Special Project’ Against ‘Christian Nationalism’

Mike Tyson Joins Forces With RFK Jr. to Battle Processed Foods

Trump’s Iran strike rocks Texas Senate race as Dems demand ‘war powers,’ GOP applauds president

Trump pledges to ‘avenge’ fallen US service members as tensions with Iran intensify

Texas bar shooting suspect wore ‘Property of Allah’ clothing with Iranian flag

Three US Service Members Killed, Five Seriously Wounded During Operation Epic Fury Against Iran

Burger King Is Altering Its Flagship Burger for the First Time in Nearly 10 Years

Typical: Virginia Democrats Are Addressing Affordability Issues by Nearly Tripling Their Own Pay

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”