Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Multiple people wounded in mass shooting at Seattle Center, police say

Newborn vanished after secret birth, parents allegedly claimed baby ‘was a prank’: cops

Inside Fauci’s private diary: What he wrote about Trump, TV personalities and celebrities

ICE prepares major operation targeting Haitians losing TPS after Supreme Court ruling

One dead, 6 injured after gunfire erupts at unsanctioned California party that drew hundreds: sheriff

Jeffries pivots to Trump and GOP when asked about noncitizens on New Jersey voter rolls

Melania Makes Next Move After Judge Tosses Out Anti-Trump Author’s Lawsuit Against Her

This red state is strengthening its grip as America’s next economic heavyweight

Mickey Mouse Massacre: Disney Has Third Round of Layoffs, Hitting ESPN, Pixar, More

Everyday Revolutionary War heroes take center stage in Trump’s ‘Spirit of ’76’ exhibit

Watch: Red Skelton’s Legendary Pledge of Allegiance Performance for Kids Resurfaces After Another Dem Lawmaker Disrespects the Pledge

Drinking Coffee Is Actually Good For Your Heart, But There’s A Catch

Fauci’s newly released COVID diaries reveal bizarre fixation on fame as pandemic deaths mounted

Watch: Weakest Police Chief in America Lets Marxists Take Over Briefing, Call for Murder of His Officer, and Then He Thanks Them for Coming

Video: Missouri High-Speed Chase Suspect Survives After Stopping Car, Swan Diving Off Bridge to Escape Cops

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”