Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Collision between two trains in Egypt kills seven and injures more than 100

Dunleavy calls Alaska voting system ‘very confusing’ as razor-thin Senate race frozen in time

11th-hour power play targets incoming Dem governor after historic GOP defeat

Watch: Shaq Snubs Angel Reese When She Asks for Picture, Instead Hits Her with Same Insult Gesture She Uses on Other Players

Trump ‘holds all the cards’ in war against Iran’s regime, White House says

Stephen Colbert accused of crossing Harvard picket line before event with Yo-Yo Ma cut short by alarm

Bureaucrats Are Trying to ‘Subvert’ the Trump Administration from Within: Former Adviser

Blue Angels pilot removed from team for ‘failing to uphold’ standards, Navy says

Alice Cooper’s autobiography is a fun read — and surprisingly morally complex

Democrats’ midterm sweep opens path to bypassing Electoral College by 2028

Daughter of Prominent Southern Baptist Pastor Dies at 19, Points Thousands to Jesus as a Result

Florida Just Handed Homeowners a Massive Tax Cut – No New Department Was Required to Pull It Off

GOP’s Gerrymandering Efforts in Several Red States Utterly Failed to Stave Off Midterm Blue Tsunami

Killer’s chewing gum blows open 40-year-old murders, detective warns there may be more victims

MAGA voters reveal who they want to see lead GOP in 2028

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”