Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Twin Blue-State Punks Meet SWAT Justice After Threatening Medieval Torture, Then Murder of DHS Asst. Dir. Tricia McLaughlin

McDonald’s Pulls Unsettling Christmas Commercial After it Sparks Massive Backlash

Federal appeals court lets Pentagon reinstate transgender service ban, says judge overstepped military leaders

Expert reveals key factor that led to massive Minnesota fraud scheme

ABC Signs Jimmy Kimmel to a New Deal Months After Affiliate Revolt

Gene Simmons gives Alex Padilla’s son music career advice: ‘Have a fall back position’

Watch: David Spade Roasts Mall That Refused to Say ‘Christmas,’ Calls Out Rampant Christian Persecution

European talks reshape Ukraine’s peace plan as Zelenskyy refuses territorial concessions

Trump’s approval climbs as Republicans rally behind president’s affordability agenda: poll

Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer

New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers

DOJ fights major obstacle to bring new case against Comey

Gene Simmons says musician royalty act is about protecting the next Elvis Presley

Vermont school district flies Somali flag amid massive fraud investigation in divisive move: GOP chair

Lawsuit: Man Died After Royal Caribbean Served Him Dozens of Alcoholic Beverages and Sedated Him

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”