Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

The Swamp’s Got Another Bright Idea, and It Could End Up Hosing Every American Who Drives

SCOTUS Showdown Over Gun Suppressors Looms After Appeals Court Creates ‘Circuit Split’

What to know about the July Fourth celebrations in DC

WATCH: Biden appears confused about where to exit stage after Democratic gala remarks

It’s Happening: CA Revival Extends for Weeks, ‘Greatest Nights’ in Over 50 Years of Evangelist’s Crusades

Parents Sue Snapchat Alleging Its Responsibility For 12-Year-Old’s Rape

Young Americans break sharply from older Americans on China threat, new poll finds

SNAP food stamp fraud has nefarious terrorism links, top Agriculture watchdog warns Congress

Frustrated blue-collar union bosses rip socialist politicians, warn of labor exodus from Dem party

Polygamous sect leader convicted on state charges after girls found in unventilated trailer

Englishman Visits America For World Cup, Meets Trump: ‘I Now Understand The American Dream’

Mackenzie Shirilla’s appeal rejected by court after ‘The Crash’ revives ‘Hell on Wheels’ case

Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter

Ukraine’s drone campaign against Russia’s energy infrastructure takes a toll, but falls short of a game changer

Congress is struggling to get its work done and a new report argues for 21st-century upgrades

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”