The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.
The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.
The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).
However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”
That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”
Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:
Billy Graham to Be Permanently Commemorated in US Capitol in ‘Rare Honor’ Anti-Israel encampments share common traits with Marxist revolutionaries, BLM and the KKK 16-Year-Old Student Who Was Suspended for Saying ‘Illegal Alien’ Hits Back Against School District NY v Trump: Judge denies motion for mistrial amid Stormy Daniels testimony Boca Bash partier’s parents issue apology after son caught dumping bins of trash into ocean Actor Ryan Gosling Reveals Why He Won’t Do Roles That Take Him to a ‘Dark Place’ Met Gala Stars Mocked as Absurd Outfits Leave Them ‘Unable to Conquer a Flight of Stairs’ Ilhan Omar’s ‘pro-genocide’ Jews remark sparks House censure effort Trump reads back to media their own trial reporting: ‘No smoking gun’ Watch: Dana White Takes a Shot at ‘Liberal’ Netflix During the Roast of Tom Brady Watch: Shameless Pro-Palestinian Activists’ Latest Target – WWI Memorial in Central Park Anti-Israel organizers at George Washington University issue new demand as campus takeover reaches 13th day Biden warns Netanyahu against Rafah invasion as Israel prepares for action Group of conservative judges vow to not hire Columbia University law students due to anti-Israel protests NY v Trump to resume after former president threatened with jail, told trial to last at least 2 more weeks
On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America. … I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war. … Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.
The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”