Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Watch: UK ‘Enforcement Officers’ See Alleged Immigrant Kick Brit Off His Bicycle, Then Assist Attacker’s Escape

BREAKING: Suspected Illegal Dead After Trying to Run Over ICE Agent Who Has Excellent Aim

Abigail Spanberger’s Virginia a ‘hotbed’ for illegal immigrant crime, DHS says after latest rape charge

Platner’s three-day vetting job comes back to haunt Dems as rape allegation rocks Senate bid

ICE says officer shot and killed illegal immigrant who tried to ram him with car in Houston

Tattooed arm in Illinois lake leads police to freezer with slain man’s head, neck and torso

Netanyahu’s Cabinet calls High Court a ‘judicial mafia’ and ‘gang of dictators’

Look at What All the Dems Suddenly Turning on Platner Said After His Numerous Other Credible Disqualifying Scandals

Woman suspected in Monaco bombing found shot dead in Ukraine

SPLC arraigned on superseding charges of donor fraud

Shock Report: Macron and France Were Prepared for ‘War’ with America After Maduro Raid

VIDEO: Suspected Antifa Surgical Strike Leaves Conservative Streamer’s Wife, Bedroom Soaked in Chemical Irritant

Progressive Dems’ full-throated Platner endorsements come back to haunt them after rape allegations

Smithsonian’s American History Museum Engages In ‘Extreme Political Activism,’ New White House Report Concludes

Kingmaker Mamdani calls on Platner to ‘drop out of the race’ after rape allegation

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”