Pulitzer Prize to New York Times Essay Falsely Claiming American Revolution Was Fought to Preserve Slavery

The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.

The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.

The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).

However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”

Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:

Democratic secretary of state was ‘prepared’ for FBI raid in Arizona, emails show

ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment

Catholic JFK Laid Out How Presidents Should Deal With Papal Criticism in Famous 1960 Speech

School Agrees to Pay Up After Counselor Was Fired for Objecting to Transgender Policy

Woman added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list arrested hours later after tips poured in from Florida: Patel

Congress mulls compelling testimony from ActBlue leadership

Hunter Biden now living abroad as legal troubles mount, court filing reveals

DC curfew ends as teen takeover fears clock in – city braces for chaos amid spring break mayhem

Bessent ‘optimistic’ gas prices will fall to $3 a gallon by midsummer

Watch: As Walls Close in, Schiff’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him in Resurfaced Pardon Video He Wishes Didn’t Exist

What to know about the Freedom 250 UFC fight on the White House lawn

Left-Wing Mob, Violent Threats Force Erika Kirk to Miss TPUSA Event with JD Vance

Trump reveals he has multi-pick SCOTUS plan ready as retirement speculation heats up

WATCH: Ex-NATO chief draws red line as Trump fumes alliance abandoned US during Iran war

Jeanine Pirro accused of trying to ‘circumvent’ Jerome Powell investigation through unprompted Fed ‘tour’

On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.

…

I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.

…

Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.

The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”