Potential Harris White House murky as VP ‘never exhibited a core set of beliefs’: Dem strategist

A potential Kamala Harris administration would likely be a continuation of the Biden administration, apart from nuanced changes on issues such as abortion and immigration.

The Democratic Party is in the midst of coping with echoing calls for President Biden to bow out of the presidential race over concerns his mental acuity has slipped, and that he’s unable to serve as president for another four years if he wins re-election. 

As the party looks for potential replacements if Biden does in fact decide to conclude his political career, Vice President Kamala Harris sits atop the list of likely successors. Harris’ has a long history as a California liberal stalwart, serving as San Francisco’s district attorney in the early 2000s, before serving as the state’s attorney general under former Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, and as U.S. senator from the Golden State before her 2020 election as vice president. 

If Harris does take up the party’s 2024’s presidential election mantle, it is unlikely Harris’ policies would drastically differ from Biden’s platforms, though she could swing harder to the left on issues such as immigration, abortion and foreign policy. A potential Harris administration is a murky topic, however, as she’s not shown a “core set of beliefs on anything,” according to Democratic strategist Julian Epstein. 

“[It’s] not clear what a Harris administration would look like as she has never exhibited a core set of beliefs on anything as far as I can see, and her pre-VP federal experience is relatively limited. For the most part, she has been, like many politicians, opportunist. She jailed lots of people for marijuana possession and then tweets about her support for legalization. She was a centrist prosecutor, then a social justice warrior,” Epstein told Fox News Digital. 


Epstein said that he would expect a hypothetical Harris administration to be a continuation of the Biden administration, while adding that the “creep of the intersectional far left would continue” under such an administration, as Democrats need “a lot of spine, guile and moxie to stand up to the intersectional left,” which Harris has not exhibited on a regular basis. 

Immigration woes have spiraled under the Biden administration to crisis levels, with a recent study finding there are 16.8 million illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. Out of that figure, more than 7 million people are not under supervision or detained, and more than 9 million are considered getaways or visa overstays, according to a study published by the National Immigration Center for Enforcement. The study found that less than 2% of illegal immigrants are in detention or enrolled in ICE’s Alternatives to Detention programs. 


“Immigration has been a flop for her and the Democrats. Upwards of 80% of the public disapproves of the Biden record on immigration and I still see no signs that the Democrats get this, or even if they do, have the gumption to stand up for what’s right here,” Epstein said, while noting that Harris has also flopped with voters when delivering “word salads and odd non-sequitur profundities.” 

Harris’ immigration policies, if she runs for president this year, would likely overwhelmingly follow that of Biden’s. Harris has also served as a point-person for the administration on immigration, with the media frequently dubbing her the “Border Czar” – a title the White House spurned – after she was tasked in 2021 with identifying the “root causes” of migration in the Northern Triangle countries. 

When she ran for president in 2020, however, she established a more liberal immigration platform than her eventual presidential running mate, placing emphasis on offering citizenship and protections to children arriving in the U.S. 

See also  Don Trump Jr. warns against Marco Rubio as father’s running mate


“As president, Kamala will fight to pass immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million people living in our communities and contributing to our economy. While she wages that fight, she will immediately reinstate DACA and implement DAPA to protect DREAMers and their parents from deportation. She will also restore and expand Temporary Protected Status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants who would face war or catastrophe if forced to return home,” her 2020 campaign website stated. 

She additionally called for the “overhaul” of “our immigration enforcement policies” arguing they were “cruel and out of control.” 

“As president, she’ll close private immigrant detention centers, increase oversight of agencies like Customs and Border Protection, and focus enforcement on increasing public safety, not on tearing apart immigrant families. For Kamala, this is about making America a place that welcomes immigrants searching for a better life,” her 2020 campaign states. 

Biden’s immigration platform during the 2020 election focused more on reversing Trump-era immigration policies in his first 100 days in office, which also included a line vowing to protect “Dreamers and their families.” 

“Immediately reverse the Trump Administration’s cruel and senseless policies that separate parents from their children at our border. End Trump’s detrimental asylum policies. End the mismanagement of the asylum system, which fuels violence and chaos at the border. Surge humanitarian resources to the border and foster public-private initiatives,” Biden’s 2020 campaign platform read in-part. 

Harris has been lauded by progressives for her vow to protect abortion access, immediately lambasting the leaked Supreme Court decision in 2022 that overturned Roe v. Wade, and effectively ended recognition of a constitutional right to abortion. 

“How dare they?” Harris declared at speech for left-wing PAC focused on electing pro-choice Democrats, EMILYs List, in May of 2022, after the decision was leaked to Politico. 

“How dare they tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body?” Harris asked. “How dare they try to stop her from determining her own future? How dare they try to deny women their rights and their freedoms?”

Biden has also become a staunch supporter of abortion access, after shifting his stance when he served as a Delaware senator in the 1970s, when the Supreme Court issued its landmark Roe v. Wade decision protecting abortion rights. 

“When it comes to issues like abortion, amnesty, and acid, I’m about as liberal as your grandmother,” Biden declared in a June 1974 article. “I don’t like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far. I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body.”

Biden has since made a 180-degree turn on his abortion policies, vowing in his State of the Union address this year to “restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land again.” 

Biden, however, came under scrutiny from abortion activists following his disastrous debate against former President Donald Trump, who said Biden’s nonsensical answer regarding whether he supports some restrictions on abortion “failed” the pro-choice movement. 

“Look, no one who cares about abortion access felt good about Biden’s comments or his performance last night,” Kellie Copeland, the director of Abortion Forward, an advocacy group in Ohio, said following the debate according the Associated Press. “We need better — we need a lot better.”

Biden is also notably a Catholic, putting him at odds with the Church’s condemnation of abortion as murder. 

See also  Family Sues Manufacturer Behind 'One Chip Challenge' After 14-Year-Old's Tragic Death

Harris, meanwhile, has taken the lead for the Biden campaign advocating for abortion access, and became the first sitting president or vice president to visit an abortion provider in March. 

“The reason I’m here is because this is a health care crisis,” Harris said when visiting the Planned Parenthood in Minnesota. “Part of this health care crisis is the clinics like this that have had to shut down and what that has meant to leave no options with any reasonable geographic area for so many women who need this essential care.”


As Harris makes abortion access a central issue in her run for re-election as vice president, if Biden drops out of the race, Harris would likely be more aggressive on her abortion stance.

“Abortion is her sweet spot,” Epstein argued. “But that could go south if Dems” focus on “abortion on demand in third trimester territory.”

“My guess is she has the compass to steer clear of those minefields,” he noted. 

Heading into the 2020 primary election, Biden and Harris did not differ on top foreign policy issues, such as returning to the Iran nuclear deal, strengthening NATO, and pledging support to Israel. Harris, notably, was green on foreign policy upon her election as vice president, mostly focusing her political career on domestic issues such as law enforcement policies, while Biden had years of foreign policy experience through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and later as vice president. 

The pair would likely not differ greatly on foreign policy and relations if Harris were to take on the 2024 election as the Democratic nominee. However, Harris was credited by the media and White House sources this year as pushing the White House to be more sympathetic toward Palestine as war raged – and continues raging – in Israel and the Gaza Strip. 

The vice president reportedly urged Biden and the White House to be “tougher” on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Politico reported in December, citing anonymous sources familiar with the conversations. While Harris’ press secretary pushed back at the time that “there is no daylight between the president and the vice president, nor has there been.”


“People in Gaza are starving. The conditions are inhumane and our common humanity compels us to act,” Harris said during a speech in March, calling for an immediate ceasefire. The comments were viewed as the strongest rebuke of Israel from a senior leader in the U.S. government. 

Epstein said that the Democratic Party overall has a “two-fold” problem with foreign policy, including the “need to pander to any group claims it affiliates with an ‘oppressed’ group,” such as Hamas. 

“Their need to pander to any group [that] claims it affiliates with an ‘oppressed’ group like Hamas. even if all the empirical evidence shows they are in fact affiliating with the most vile, racist, ethnonationalist, Klan-like organization on the planet that promises genocide in its charter.  Rather than telling the country the hard truths – that Israel’s war is just and it has done more to protect civilians than any modern day army – it instead panders to the hard left that shows only a sorrowful moral confusion on the issue.  And that is the mindset that is hurting the Democratic party,” he said. 

He also noted that the Democrat Party’s platform of “appeasement” in foreign policy has compounded the issue. 

See also  Hunter Biden's Legal Team Gives Up Push for New Trial, Admits Embarrassing Gaffe

“The problem in foreign policy with the Democrats … [is] a wholly naive belief that appeasement works with terrorist states like Iran. [There’s a] breakdown of American deterrence on every continent right now, but Democrats, for all their talk about global order, don’t seem to understand that order requires sticks and not just carrots. Our military is grossly underfunded relative to the threats of China and others. The lifting of sanctions on Iran clearly backfired. Iran, China, Russia, and the lesser revisionist states, all see weakened deterrence as an invitation for mischief.   The old maxim attributed to Churchill – ‘you cannot negotiate with a tiger when your head is in its mouth’ – seems to be lost on Dems,” he said. 


Democratic calls for Biden to drop out of the race have mounted since Biden’s disastrous debate performance against Trump on June 27, when he tripped over his words, spoke in subdued, raspy tenor and lost his train of thought at times. Conservatives have long been sounding the alarm that Biden’s mental acuity was on a downward spiral, citing repeated gaffes of the president during public events, with Democrats now joining those calls of concern over the president’s 81 years of age and mental fitness. 


Biden has vowed to remain in the race, including during his first sit-down interview with media since his debate performance, where he argued the debate was simply a “bad episode” and that he’s determined to win reelection. The interview, which was conducted by ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos, was panned as failing to quell concerns over the president’s re-election viability. 

At one point in the interview, Stephanopoulos pressed Biden three times on whether he would take a cognitive test and release the results to the public. Biden dodged the questions. 

“Look, I have a cognitive test every single day,” Biden said. “Every day I have that test. Everything I do. You know, not only am I campaigning, but I’m running the world. Sounds like hyperbole, but we are the central nation in the world.”


On Monday, the president sent a letter to congressional Democrats calling on them to end their questions on whether he should end his re-election bid. 

“I want you to know that despite all the speculation in the press and elsewhere, I am firmly committed to staying in this race, to running this race to the end, and to beating Donald Trump.”

 “I wouldn’t be running again if I did not absolutely believe I was the best person to beat Donald Trump in 2024,” he added. 


At least ten congressional Democrats have called on Biden to drop out, while an additional eight elected Democrats have raised concerns over Biden’s mental fitness and age, including former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Legacy media outlets such as the New York Times and and Chicago Tribune were among the first to call on Biden to end his re-election effort.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Fox News Digital’s Adam Shaw and Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report. 

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter