House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said Thursday at her weekly press briefing that Lev Parnas was a “credible witness.”
Lev Parnas accused President Donald Trump of an attempted quid pro quo with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky during an MSNBC interview with Rachel Maddow on Wednesday.
A reporter asked, “Parnas is under federal indictment. So would he be a credible witness?”
Agitators outside Delaney Hall set up organized logistics operation before Newark protests began
Leftists Host Striptease Fundraiser to Support Antifa Terrorists Behind Shooting at ICE Detention Facility in 2025
Arizona school board member gets backlash after mocking board president with Nazi salute
Trump calls on all future candidates to take cognitive exam, noting perfect score during latest physical
Infected Lab Monkey Bites Government Employee in the US, GOP Senator Demands Investigation
FBI hunts most wanted neighbor next door who allegedly faked cancer, scammed loved ones for luxury getaways
E. Jean Carroll is a mess for the administration that won’t go away
Smithsonian Accused of Rewriting Nixon History with False Impeachment Claim
Fact Check: Ken Paxton Absolutely Didn’t Let a Sex Offender Go Free – Here’s What Really Happened
Scary stories to tell seniors
Lithuania warns Russian economy is ‘built on war’ and Baltic states are likely next target
Karen Bass appears to liken Spencer Pratt to Trump amid tightening LA mayoral race
Hasan Piker defends pro-communist, anti-ICE Singham network activists as ‘wonderful people’
California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus
Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter
Pelosi said, “He’d be a credible witness if what he is testifying to relates to the issue at hand, the president’s behavior. But again, they — there is a process for — for how you go forward with witnesses and that’s not done in the basement of the congressional visitors center but in — you know, among those who are making those decisions about how to go forward. And I’m so proud of our managers, our members have been so positive about it and, you know, this is not without risk. They are going to give a great deal of their intellect as an intellectual resource, as patriots gave me a great deal of time, of course, but also they are courageous, let me say it that way, they are courageous.”
Story cited here.
