A new study finds climate change skeptics are more likely to behave in eco-friendly ways than those who are highly concerned about the issue.
Do our behaviors really reflect our beliefs? New research suggests that, when it comes to climate change, the answer is no. And that goes for both skeptics and believers.
Participants in a year-long study who doubted the scientific consensus on the issue “opposed policy solutions,” but at the same time, they “were most likely to report engaging in individual-level, pro-environmental behaviors,” writes a research team led by University of Michigan psychologist Michael Hall.
Conversely, those who expressed the greatest belief in, and concern about, the warming environment “were most supportive of government climate policies, but least likely to report individual-level actions.”
Sorry, I didn’t have time to recycle—I was busy watching a documentary about the crumbling Antarctic ice shelf.
NYC Jewish community on high alert from protests threatened with trio of bomb threats at synagogues Former NBA Player Found Dead at 33 in Los Angeles Area ‘The Lord of the Rings,’ ‘Titanic’ Star Dead at 79 New revelations in Florida documents trial put Trump on offense against ‘deranged’ special counsel Biden campaign co-chair brushes off Sanders’ comparison of campus chaos to Vietnam: ‘Over-exaggeration’ Watch: NFL Star Gets Dominated by Sumo Wrestler, Laughed at After Embarrassing Loss Be Careful What You Flush Fetterman says anti-Israel campus protests ‘working against peace’ in Middle East, not putting hostages first Hormel Foods Announces Recall – Toss Anything with These Two Codes Immediately Revenge or Repentance: What Are You Wishing on Your Worst Enemy? Biden administration puts hold on US ammunition shipment to Israel: report US shared intel with UK showing ‘high likelihood’ of COVID-19 lab leak: report Eye-popping haul amid trials has Team Trump closing fundraising gap with Biden Legendary Comedian Bravely Attacks Sharia Law – Highlights How Some Cultures Are Superior Car Drives Straight into White House Perimeter Gate, Resulting in Deadly Crash
The study, published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, followed more than 400 Americans for a full year. On seven occasions—roughly once every eight weeks—participants revealed their climate change beliefs, and their level of support for policies such as gasoline taxes and fuel economy standards.
They also noted how frequently they engaged in four environmentally friendly behaviors: recycling, using public transportation, buying “green” products, and using reusable shopping bags.
The researchers found participants broke down into three groups, which they labeled “skeptical,” “cautiously worried,” and “highly concerned.” While policy preferences of group members tracked with their beliefs, their behaviors largely did not: Skeptics reported using public transportation, buying eco-friendly products, and using reusable bags more often than those in the other two categories.
This pattern was found consistently through the year, leading the researchers to conclude that “belief in climate change does not appear to be a necessary or sufficient condition for pro-environmental behavior.”
Hall and his colleagues can only speculate about the reasons for their results. But regarding the concerned but inactive, the psychological phenomenon known as moral licensing is a likely culprit.
Previous research has found doing something altruistic—even buying organic foods—gives us license to engage in selfish activity. We’ve “earned” points in our own mind. So if you’ve pledged some money to Greenpeace, you feel entitled to enjoying the convenience of a plastic bag.
Regarding climate change skeptics, remember that conservatism prizes individual action over collective efforts. So while they may assert disbelief in order to stave off coercive (in their view) actions by the government, many could take pride in doing what they can do on a personal basis.
The results suggest that “changing skeptical Americans’ minds need not be a top priority for climate policymakers,” at least if their goal is inspiring individual action. Perhaps the more urgent task is to focus on people who already grasp the problem, and get them to align their actions with their concern.
Story cited here.