Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
Mob of anti-ICE activists to march on Portland mayor’s home
Epstein files implode British politics with ‘biggest scandal’ in ‘over one century’
Hegseth ending military education ties with Harvard amid Trump feud: ‘We train warriors, not wokesters’
Hegseth says National Guard members shot in DC ambush by Afghan national will receive Purple Heart
SBA freezes over 100,000 California borrowers in sweeping $9B pandemic fraud crackdown
Israeli Government-Funded ‘Mobile Museum’ Set to Visit US Churches to Promote Zionism
Hundreds of Bizarre References to ‘Pizza’ in New Epstein Documents Raise Eyebrows
Watch: NFL Players Accidentally Prove Bad Bunny Is a Horrible Choice for Super Bowl Halftime Show
Conservative firebrand vows to purge ‘RINOs’ in battle to replace retiring Vern Buchanan in open Florida seat
When anti-ICE clashes trigger federal intervention: Experts explain the constitutional breaking point
North Carolina man charged with three counts of statutory rape held on ICE detainer
Nancy Guthrie’s Neighbor Details Mysterious Sighting Shortly Before Disappearance
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Top teachers’ union under fire, anti-ICE agitator network exposed
Actor and Producer Timothy Busfield Charged with Committing Child Sex Crimes on Set
Gonzales introduces bill to expand protections for Border Patrol assisting state, local law enforcement
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
Mob of anti-ICE activists to march on Portland mayor’s home
Epstein files implode British politics with ‘biggest scandal’ in ‘over one century’
Hegseth ending military education ties with Harvard amid Trump feud: ‘We train warriors, not wokesters’
Hegseth says National Guard members shot in DC ambush by Afghan national will receive Purple Heart
SBA freezes over 100,000 California borrowers in sweeping $9B pandemic fraud crackdown
Israeli Government-Funded ‘Mobile Museum’ Set to Visit US Churches to Promote Zionism
Hundreds of Bizarre References to ‘Pizza’ in New Epstein Documents Raise Eyebrows
Watch: NFL Players Accidentally Prove Bad Bunny Is a Horrible Choice for Super Bowl Halftime Show
Conservative firebrand vows to purge ‘RINOs’ in battle to replace retiring Vern Buchanan in open Florida seat
When anti-ICE clashes trigger federal intervention: Experts explain the constitutional breaking point
North Carolina man charged with three counts of statutory rape held on ICE detainer
Nancy Guthrie’s Neighbor Details Mysterious Sighting Shortly Before Disappearance
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Top teachers’ union under fire, anti-ICE agitator network exposed
Actor and Producer Timothy Busfield Charged with Committing Child Sex Crimes on Set
Gonzales introduces bill to expand protections for Border Patrol assisting state, local law enforcement
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Mob of anti-ICE activists to march on Portland mayor’s home
Epstein files implode British politics with ‘biggest scandal’ in ‘over one century’
Hegseth ending military education ties with Harvard amid Trump feud: ‘We train warriors, not wokesters’
Hegseth says National Guard members shot in DC ambush by Afghan national will receive Purple Heart
SBA freezes over 100,000 California borrowers in sweeping $9B pandemic fraud crackdown
Israeli Government-Funded ‘Mobile Museum’ Set to Visit US Churches to Promote Zionism
Hundreds of Bizarre References to ‘Pizza’ in New Epstein Documents Raise Eyebrows
Watch: NFL Players Accidentally Prove Bad Bunny Is a Horrible Choice for Super Bowl Halftime Show
Conservative firebrand vows to purge ‘RINOs’ in battle to replace retiring Vern Buchanan in open Florida seat
When anti-ICE clashes trigger federal intervention: Experts explain the constitutional breaking point
North Carolina man charged with three counts of statutory rape held on ICE detainer
Nancy Guthrie’s Neighbor Details Mysterious Sighting Shortly Before Disappearance
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Top teachers’ union under fire, anti-ICE agitator network exposed
Actor and Producer Timothy Busfield Charged with Committing Child Sex Crimes on Set
Gonzales introduces bill to expand protections for Border Patrol assisting state, local law enforcement
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
