Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
Rapper Nicki Minaj teams up with new Turning Point USA leader Erika Kirk for Q&A session
MTG tells her successor not to ‘bow in loyalty’ to White House and GOP
Police Safely Capture Rogue Kangaroo Running Wild … in Oklahoma
Former Brown University student and friend to Ella Cook blames ‘spending priorities’ for lack of security
California Drive-By Targets Jewish Family’s Hanukkah Display Just 2 Days Before Bondi Beach Massacre
AmericaFest honors Target employee Jeanie Beeman after viral video shows calm response to harassment
DNI Gabbard warns ‘Islamist ideology’ threatens Western freedom at AmFest
Jillian Michaels Leaves NYT Race-Baiter Stunned and Confused With Quick Retort: ‘You Know I’m Arab, Right?’
Amazon Apologizes After Delivery Driver Drops Off Package, Allegedly Steals Homeowner’s Cat
Murdaugh lawyer ‘cautiously optimistic’ court clerk’s misconduct could pave way for new trial
San Francisco power outage puts 130,000 in the dark, as self-driving car service stops vehicles in the street
Campaign finance data paint complicated picture for House Republicans as 2026 approaches
After rough 2025 elections, top GOP hopeful says conservatism’s future runs through sound economic message
Media ‘complicity’ blamed as feds say Minnesota fraud crisis could reach $9B: ‘Shown their true colors’
Liberal Berates Target Employee Over Charlie Kirk ‘Freedom’ Shirt, Highlighting the Left’s Growing Intolerance
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
Rapper Nicki Minaj teams up with new Turning Point USA leader Erika Kirk for Q&A session
MTG tells her successor not to ‘bow in loyalty’ to White House and GOP
Police Safely Capture Rogue Kangaroo Running Wild … in Oklahoma
Former Brown University student and friend to Ella Cook blames ‘spending priorities’ for lack of security
California Drive-By Targets Jewish Family’s Hanukkah Display Just 2 Days Before Bondi Beach Massacre
AmericaFest honors Target employee Jeanie Beeman after viral video shows calm response to harassment
DNI Gabbard warns ‘Islamist ideology’ threatens Western freedom at AmFest
Jillian Michaels Leaves NYT Race-Baiter Stunned and Confused With Quick Retort: ‘You Know I’m Arab, Right?’
Amazon Apologizes After Delivery Driver Drops Off Package, Allegedly Steals Homeowner’s Cat
Murdaugh lawyer ‘cautiously optimistic’ court clerk’s misconduct could pave way for new trial
San Francisco power outage puts 130,000 in the dark, as self-driving car service stops vehicles in the street
Campaign finance data paint complicated picture for House Republicans as 2026 approaches
After rough 2025 elections, top GOP hopeful says conservatism’s future runs through sound economic message
Media ‘complicity’ blamed as feds say Minnesota fraud crisis could reach $9B: ‘Shown their true colors’
Liberal Berates Target Employee Over Charlie Kirk ‘Freedom’ Shirt, Highlighting the Left’s Growing Intolerance
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Rapper Nicki Minaj teams up with new Turning Point USA leader Erika Kirk for Q&A session
MTG tells her successor not to ‘bow in loyalty’ to White House and GOP
Police Safely Capture Rogue Kangaroo Running Wild … in Oklahoma
Former Brown University student and friend to Ella Cook blames ‘spending priorities’ for lack of security
California Drive-By Targets Jewish Family’s Hanukkah Display Just 2 Days Before Bondi Beach Massacre
AmericaFest honors Target employee Jeanie Beeman after viral video shows calm response to harassment
DNI Gabbard warns ‘Islamist ideology’ threatens Western freedom at AmFest
Jillian Michaels Leaves NYT Race-Baiter Stunned and Confused With Quick Retort: ‘You Know I’m Arab, Right?’
Amazon Apologizes After Delivery Driver Drops Off Package, Allegedly Steals Homeowner’s Cat
Murdaugh lawyer ‘cautiously optimistic’ court clerk’s misconduct could pave way for new trial
San Francisco power outage puts 130,000 in the dark, as self-driving car service stops vehicles in the street
Campaign finance data paint complicated picture for House Republicans as 2026 approaches
After rough 2025 elections, top GOP hopeful says conservatism’s future runs through sound economic message
Media ‘complicity’ blamed as feds say Minnesota fraud crisis could reach $9B: ‘Shown their true colors’
Liberal Berates Target Employee Over Charlie Kirk ‘Freedom’ Shirt, Highlighting the Left’s Growing Intolerance
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
