News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Combustible Republican Senate primary in Texas heading into overtime
BREAKING: Jasmine Crockett Gets Stomped in Primary as Even Democrats Find Tolerating Her Presence Impossible
Austin suspect unleashed anti-Christian, antisemitic, misogynistic rants on social media before mass shooting
New York AG orders Manhattan hospital to resume gender-transition treatment for transgender youth
Natural gas prices surge worldwide as Iran conflict crimps supply
BREAKING: Masked Man Arrested Outside GOP Campaign Event – Cops Bagging Multiple Rifle and Pistol Magazines – No Injuries
Trump says NYC Mayor Mamdani made ‘big progress’ embracing Declaration of Independence
Watch: Australian News Host Becomes Legend – Starts Speaking Persian and Signs Off with Brutal Curse for Khamenei That She’d Never Get Away with in English
BREAKING: Largest US Base in Middle East Hit by Ballistic Missile from Iran – Details Still Coming In
Waymo autonomous car blocks ambulance crew responding to deadly Austin mass shooting
Watch the most viral moments as Kristi Noem’s hearing goes off the rails
Israel First? MAGA divide erupts over allegations Netanyahu pushed US into Iran conflict
Iran retaliation fears fail to move Democrats on DHS shutdown
Lindsey Graham already moves on from Iran, warns ‘Cuba is next’
Nancy Mace to force vote targeting fellow GOP lawmaker accused of affair with staffer
See also  California’s vulnerable House Republicans swap districts and strategize ahead of primary

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Combustible Republican Senate primary in Texas heading into overtime
BREAKING: Jasmine Crockett Gets Stomped in Primary as Even Democrats Find Tolerating Her Presence Impossible
Austin suspect unleashed anti-Christian, antisemitic, misogynistic rants on social media before mass shooting
New York AG orders Manhattan hospital to resume gender-transition treatment for transgender youth
Natural gas prices surge worldwide as Iran conflict crimps supply
BREAKING: Masked Man Arrested Outside GOP Campaign Event – Cops Bagging Multiple Rifle and Pistol Magazines – No Injuries
Trump says NYC Mayor Mamdani made ‘big progress’ embracing Declaration of Independence
Watch: Australian News Host Becomes Legend – Starts Speaking Persian and Signs Off with Brutal Curse for Khamenei That She’d Never Get Away with in English
BREAKING: Largest US Base in Middle East Hit by Ballistic Missile from Iran – Details Still Coming In
Waymo autonomous car blocks ambulance crew responding to deadly Austin mass shooting
Watch the most viral moments as Kristi Noem’s hearing goes off the rails
Israel First? MAGA divide erupts over allegations Netanyahu pushed US into Iran conflict
Iran retaliation fears fail to move Democrats on DHS shutdown
Lindsey Graham already moves on from Iran, warns ‘Cuba is next’
Nancy Mace to force vote targeting fellow GOP lawmaker accused of affair with staffer
See also  Richard Cox derails sex offender case, once again

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Combustible Republican Senate primary in Texas heading into overtime
BREAKING: Jasmine Crockett Gets Stomped in Primary as Even Democrats Find Tolerating Her Presence Impossible
Austin suspect unleashed anti-Christian, antisemitic, misogynistic rants on social media before mass shooting
New York AG orders Manhattan hospital to resume gender-transition treatment for transgender youth
Natural gas prices surge worldwide as Iran conflict crimps supply
BREAKING: Masked Man Arrested Outside GOP Campaign Event – Cops Bagging Multiple Rifle and Pistol Magazines – No Injuries
Trump says NYC Mayor Mamdani made ‘big progress’ embracing Declaration of Independence
Watch: Australian News Host Becomes Legend – Starts Speaking Persian and Signs Off with Brutal Curse for Khamenei That She’d Never Get Away with in English
BREAKING: Largest US Base in Middle East Hit by Ballistic Missile from Iran – Details Still Coming In
Waymo autonomous car blocks ambulance crew responding to deadly Austin mass shooting
Watch the most viral moments as Kristi Noem’s hearing goes off the rails
Israel First? MAGA divide erupts over allegations Netanyahu pushed US into Iran conflict
Iran retaliation fears fail to move Democrats on DHS shutdown
Lindsey Graham already moves on from Iran, warns ‘Cuba is next’
Nancy Mace to force vote targeting fellow GOP lawmaker accused of affair with staffer
See also  Newsom book tour missteps expose national campaign ‘growing pains’

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter