News • Opinons • Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Fulton Sheen became a TV sensation preaching faith, morality and warnings Michael Knowles says still resonate
WATCH: Former Dem Lt Gov reveals why he resigned after sexual harassment probe rocked state
Breaking: SCOTUS Strikes Down GOP-Favored Map Revived Just 4 Days Ago
St Paul police chief sues mayor, alleging she called herself a ‘MILF,’ sexually harassed him and retaliated
Family of paralyzed Marine vet allegedly shot by migrant speaks out as health issue could delay testimony
Supreme Court blocks Missouri from using new congressional map in 2026 election
For This Dem Judge, a Gay Man’s Life Is Only Worth $765 and 30 Days in Jail When It’s Taken by a Black Woman
Woman Has Part of Her Face Bitten Off in Random ‘Zombie Bite’ Attack
Florida GOP nominee blasts 20-year Dem incumbent as a ‘socialist’ rubber-stamp with ‘precious little to show’
Pope Leo Issues Apocalyptic Warning About AI Creating a ‘Paradise of Machines’
Tennessee Man, 68, Charged with Threatening to Kill ICE Agents on Left-Wing Social Media Platform
Suspect in Fatal College Football Stabbing ID’d as Foreign National Who Overstayed Visa
Starbucks to Close Down Hundreds of Underperforming Locations
Iranian President Plays Victim on Fox News After Decades of Terror Funding: ‘We Do Not Seek War’
WATCH: DHS issues stark warning after 300 ‘hostile’ cartel drones detected at southern border
See also  Trump allies building ‘lawfare’ defense apparatus before possible Democratic takeover

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Fulton Sheen became a TV sensation preaching faith, morality and warnings Michael Knowles says still resonate
WATCH: Former Dem Lt Gov reveals why he resigned after sexual harassment probe rocked state
Breaking: SCOTUS Strikes Down GOP-Favored Map Revived Just 4 Days Ago
St Paul police chief sues mayor, alleging she called herself a ‘MILF,’ sexually harassed him and retaliated
Family of paralyzed Marine vet allegedly shot by migrant speaks out as health issue could delay testimony
Supreme Court blocks Missouri from using new congressional map in 2026 election
For This Dem Judge, a Gay Man’s Life Is Only Worth $765 and 30 Days in Jail When It’s Taken by a Black Woman
Woman Has Part of Her Face Bitten Off in Random ‘Zombie Bite’ Attack
Florida GOP nominee blasts 20-year Dem incumbent as a ‘socialist’ rubber-stamp with ‘precious little to show’
Pope Leo Issues Apocalyptic Warning About AI Creating a ‘Paradise of Machines’
Tennessee Man, 68, Charged with Threatening to Kill ICE Agents on Left-Wing Social Media Platform
Suspect in Fatal College Football Stabbing ID’d as Foreign National Who Overstayed Visa
Starbucks to Close Down Hundreds of Underperforming Locations
Iranian President Plays Victim on Fox News After Decades of Terror Funding: ‘We Do Not Seek War’
WATCH: DHS issues stark warning after 300 ‘hostile’ cartel drones detected at southern border
See also  Trump allies building ‘lawfare’ defense apparatus before possible Democratic takeover

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Fulton Sheen became a TV sensation preaching faith, morality and warnings Michael Knowles says still resonate
WATCH: Former Dem Lt Gov reveals why he resigned after sexual harassment probe rocked state
Breaking: SCOTUS Strikes Down GOP-Favored Map Revived Just 4 Days Ago
St Paul police chief sues mayor, alleging she called herself a ‘MILF,’ sexually harassed him and retaliated
Family of paralyzed Marine vet allegedly shot by migrant speaks out as health issue could delay testimony
Supreme Court blocks Missouri from using new congressional map in 2026 election
For This Dem Judge, a Gay Man’s Life Is Only Worth $765 and 30 Days in Jail When It’s Taken by a Black Woman
Woman Has Part of Her Face Bitten Off in Random ‘Zombie Bite’ Attack
Florida GOP nominee blasts 20-year Dem incumbent as a ‘socialist’ rubber-stamp with ‘precious little to show’
Pope Leo Issues Apocalyptic Warning About AI Creating a ‘Paradise of Machines’
Tennessee Man, 68, Charged with Threatening to Kill ICE Agents on Left-Wing Social Media Platform
Suspect in Fatal College Football Stabbing ID’d as Foreign National Who Overstayed Visa
Starbucks to Close Down Hundreds of Underperforming Locations
Iranian President Plays Victim on Fox News After Decades of Terror Funding: ‘We Do Not Seek War’
WATCH: DHS issues stark warning after 300 ‘hostile’ cartel drones detected at southern border
See also  Trump allies building ‘lawfare’ defense apparatus before possible Democratic takeover

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter