News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Watch: 4 of the Most Intense Exchanges When RFK Jr. Put CNN’s Dana Bash in Her Place on COVID and Fauci
Democrats blink as Schumer helps GOP clear key shutdown hurdle
Trump Says ‘Last Chance’ Talks with Iran Are ‘Going on Right Now’
‘Doctor’ El-Sayed’s bizarre health hustle raises campaign headache: ‘Moon Juice Brain Dust’
Trump administration’s immigration push fuels ICE’s biggest arrest month in agency history
Citadel cadet, childhood friend gunned down in vacant Florida lot as police launch manhunt
State Department denies call with under-pressure FIFA president Infantino
Trump says Jeanine Pirro ‘choked’ in Reflecting Pool vandalism case: ‘Folded like an umbrella’
Dem senator accuses Pentagon of murder with boat strikes targeting drug traffickers
GOP lawmaker’s gifts, ‘effusive affection’ toward young staffers detailed in explosive ethics report
Muslim Assailants Kill Church Elder, At Least 20 Other Christians, In Targeted Attacks
Breaking: Todd Blanche Nomination Poised to Succeed as Two GOP Holdouts Flip
Board of Peace demands Netanyahu cease Gaza airstrikes as Israel refuses to comply with peace plan
Denmark’s military conscription ‘expanded and strengthened’ as tensions mount with DC and Moscow
Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric
See also  Races to watch in Michigan as establishment Democrats face off against challenges on their left flank

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Watch: 4 of the Most Intense Exchanges When RFK Jr. Put CNN’s Dana Bash in Her Place on COVID and Fauci
Democrats blink as Schumer helps GOP clear key shutdown hurdle
Trump Says ‘Last Chance’ Talks with Iran Are ‘Going on Right Now’
‘Doctor’ El-Sayed’s bizarre health hustle raises campaign headache: ‘Moon Juice Brain Dust’
Trump administration’s immigration push fuels ICE’s biggest arrest month in agency history
Citadel cadet, childhood friend gunned down in vacant Florida lot as police launch manhunt
State Department denies call with under-pressure FIFA president Infantino
Trump says Jeanine Pirro ‘choked’ in Reflecting Pool vandalism case: ‘Folded like an umbrella’
Dem senator accuses Pentagon of murder with boat strikes targeting drug traffickers
GOP lawmaker’s gifts, ‘effusive affection’ toward young staffers detailed in explosive ethics report
Muslim Assailants Kill Church Elder, At Least 20 Other Christians, In Targeted Attacks
Breaking: Todd Blanche Nomination Poised to Succeed as Two GOP Holdouts Flip
Board of Peace demands Netanyahu cease Gaza airstrikes as Israel refuses to comply with peace plan
Denmark’s military conscription ‘expanded and strengthened’ as tensions mount with DC and Moscow
Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric
See also  Races to watch in Michigan as establishment Democrats face off against challenges on their left flank

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Watch: 4 of the Most Intense Exchanges When RFK Jr. Put CNN’s Dana Bash in Her Place on COVID and Fauci
Democrats blink as Schumer helps GOP clear key shutdown hurdle
Trump Says ‘Last Chance’ Talks with Iran Are ‘Going on Right Now’
‘Doctor’ El-Sayed’s bizarre health hustle raises campaign headache: ‘Moon Juice Brain Dust’
Trump administration’s immigration push fuels ICE’s biggest arrest month in agency history
Citadel cadet, childhood friend gunned down in vacant Florida lot as police launch manhunt
State Department denies call with under-pressure FIFA president Infantino
Trump says Jeanine Pirro ‘choked’ in Reflecting Pool vandalism case: ‘Folded like an umbrella’
Dem senator accuses Pentagon of murder with boat strikes targeting drug traffickers
GOP lawmaker’s gifts, ‘effusive affection’ toward young staffers detailed in explosive ethics report
Muslim Assailants Kill Church Elder, At Least 20 Other Christians, In Targeted Attacks
Breaking: Todd Blanche Nomination Poised to Succeed as Two GOP Holdouts Flip
Board of Peace demands Netanyahu cease Gaza airstrikes as Israel refuses to comply with peace plan
Denmark’s military conscription ‘expanded and strengthened’ as tensions mount with DC and Moscow
Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric
See also  Races to watch in Michigan as establishment Democrats face off against challenges on their left flank

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter