Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
Muslim groups, other leaders demand Abbott rescind CAIR’s ‘terrorist’ designation: ‘Defamatory’
Rep. Swalwell sues Trump official over mortgage fraud allegations: ‘A gross abuse of power’
Roblox CEO calls child predator crisis an ‘opportunity’ amid ban of gamer who exposed groomers on platform
Miami woman allegedly slices boyfriend with machete after restaurant fight over infidelity
‘Zizian’ ringleader accuses Trump admin of transgender ‘genocide’ in courtroom tirade
DHS says four House Democrats ‘chose to stand with criminal illegal aliens’ after visiting ICE detainee
Navy sailor dies after rescuing 2 children from high surf in Hawaii waters
Parents/Grandparents Alert: Christmas AI Teddy Bears Can Teach Kids About Bondage Sex, How to Light Matches, Where to Find Knives, Pills, Plastic Bags
Fact Check: Did the Trump Administration Declare Nurses Aren’t ‘Professionals’?
NYC Council welcomes new mayor with bill that would dramatically raise salaries for city officials
Taliban vows to respond after alleged Pakistani strikes rock Afghanistan overnight
Trump Admin to Begin ‘Comprehensive Review’ of Every Refugee Admitted to US Under Biden
Trump, Duffy slam Pritzker’s ‘soft-on-crime policies’ after Chicago woman set on fire on train
Missing Virginia high school coach investigated for child porn and soliciting a minor, police say
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Former Army captain warns Dems’ ‘unpatriotic’ video could spark chaos
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
Muslim groups, other leaders demand Abbott rescind CAIR’s ‘terrorist’ designation: ‘Defamatory’
Rep. Swalwell sues Trump official over mortgage fraud allegations: ‘A gross abuse of power’
Roblox CEO calls child predator crisis an ‘opportunity’ amid ban of gamer who exposed groomers on platform
Miami woman allegedly slices boyfriend with machete after restaurant fight over infidelity
‘Zizian’ ringleader accuses Trump admin of transgender ‘genocide’ in courtroom tirade
DHS says four House Democrats ‘chose to stand with criminal illegal aliens’ after visiting ICE detainee
Navy sailor dies after rescuing 2 children from high surf in Hawaii waters
Parents/Grandparents Alert: Christmas AI Teddy Bears Can Teach Kids About Bondage Sex, How to Light Matches, Where to Find Knives, Pills, Plastic Bags
Fact Check: Did the Trump Administration Declare Nurses Aren’t ‘Professionals’?
NYC Council welcomes new mayor with bill that would dramatically raise salaries for city officials
Taliban vows to respond after alleged Pakistani strikes rock Afghanistan overnight
Trump Admin to Begin ‘Comprehensive Review’ of Every Refugee Admitted to US Under Biden
Trump, Duffy slam Pritzker’s ‘soft-on-crime policies’ after Chicago woman set on fire on train
Missing Virginia high school coach investigated for child porn and soliciting a minor, police say
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Former Army captain warns Dems’ ‘unpatriotic’ video could spark chaos
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Muslim groups, other leaders demand Abbott rescind CAIR’s ‘terrorist’ designation: ‘Defamatory’
Rep. Swalwell sues Trump official over mortgage fraud allegations: ‘A gross abuse of power’
Roblox CEO calls child predator crisis an ‘opportunity’ amid ban of gamer who exposed groomers on platform
Miami woman allegedly slices boyfriend with machete after restaurant fight over infidelity
‘Zizian’ ringleader accuses Trump admin of transgender ‘genocide’ in courtroom tirade
DHS says four House Democrats ‘chose to stand with criminal illegal aliens’ after visiting ICE detainee
Navy sailor dies after rescuing 2 children from high surf in Hawaii waters
Parents/Grandparents Alert: Christmas AI Teddy Bears Can Teach Kids About Bondage Sex, How to Light Matches, Where to Find Knives, Pills, Plastic Bags
Fact Check: Did the Trump Administration Declare Nurses Aren’t ‘Professionals’?
NYC Council welcomes new mayor with bill that would dramatically raise salaries for city officials
Taliban vows to respond after alleged Pakistani strikes rock Afghanistan overnight
Trump Admin to Begin ‘Comprehensive Review’ of Every Refugee Admitted to US Under Biden
Trump, Duffy slam Pritzker’s ‘soft-on-crime policies’ after Chicago woman set on fire on train
Missing Virginia high school coach investigated for child porn and soliciting a minor, police say
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Former Army captain warns Dems’ ‘unpatriotic’ video could spark chaos
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
