Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
Watch: Kathy Hochul Stumbles in Debate Opening Statement and Republican Opponent Bruce Blakeman Pounces
The Houthis Are Receiving Help Directly from China as They Attempt to Build Their Own Game-Changing Weapon: Report
Trump says ‘we are looking into’ other Dan Sullivan on Alaska ballot, warns about governor’s race
New York governor debate heats up as Blakeman, Hochul spar over Trump, sanctuary status, ICE shooting
‘Tsunami of Republican Money’ Could Turn Midterms Upside Down, Says Top Democrat
NY Dem Congressional Candidate Wants Cornell 7’s ‘Severed Heads on Pikes,’ Ignores That There’s Been No Trial
99,000 arrested at Mexican border in Trump’s first year versus two million in Biden’s year one
Schumer warns of Republican advantage that could change the battle for Senate control
Democrats have ‘dirty hands’ over complaints about Omar raid weeks before election, ex-prosecutor says
Trump announces massive oil, gas and mineral exploration plans in Greenland, touts national security benefits
Trump administration slashes time refugees have to challenge loss of legal status
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani says he won’t fire NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch despite socialist pressure
Trump signs pardons for Alaska diesel mechanics onstage during rally touting major energy deals
Trump Energy Department issues emergency order to prevent blackouts across 13 states amid unusual October heat
Florida executes inmate who killed cellmate because he wanted death penalty
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
Watch: Kathy Hochul Stumbles in Debate Opening Statement and Republican Opponent Bruce Blakeman Pounces
The Houthis Are Receiving Help Directly from China as They Attempt to Build Their Own Game-Changing Weapon: Report
Trump says ‘we are looking into’ other Dan Sullivan on Alaska ballot, warns about governor’s race
New York governor debate heats up as Blakeman, Hochul spar over Trump, sanctuary status, ICE shooting
‘Tsunami of Republican Money’ Could Turn Midterms Upside Down, Says Top Democrat
NY Dem Congressional Candidate Wants Cornell 7’s ‘Severed Heads on Pikes,’ Ignores That There’s Been No Trial
99,000 arrested at Mexican border in Trump’s first year versus two million in Biden’s year one
Schumer warns of Republican advantage that could change the battle for Senate control
Democrats have ‘dirty hands’ over complaints about Omar raid weeks before election, ex-prosecutor says
Trump announces massive oil, gas and mineral exploration plans in Greenland, touts national security benefits
Trump administration slashes time refugees have to challenge loss of legal status
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani says he won’t fire NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch despite socialist pressure
Trump signs pardons for Alaska diesel mechanics onstage during rally touting major energy deals
Trump Energy Department issues emergency order to prevent blackouts across 13 states amid unusual October heat
Florida executes inmate who killed cellmate because he wanted death penalty
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Watch: Kathy Hochul Stumbles in Debate Opening Statement and Republican Opponent Bruce Blakeman Pounces
The Houthis Are Receiving Help Directly from China as They Attempt to Build Their Own Game-Changing Weapon: Report
Trump says ‘we are looking into’ other Dan Sullivan on Alaska ballot, warns about governor’s race
New York governor debate heats up as Blakeman, Hochul spar over Trump, sanctuary status, ICE shooting
‘Tsunami of Republican Money’ Could Turn Midterms Upside Down, Says Top Democrat
NY Dem Congressional Candidate Wants Cornell 7’s ‘Severed Heads on Pikes,’ Ignores That There’s Been No Trial
99,000 arrested at Mexican border in Trump’s first year versus two million in Biden’s year one
Schumer warns of Republican advantage that could change the battle for Senate control
Democrats have ‘dirty hands’ over complaints about Omar raid weeks before election, ex-prosecutor says
Trump announces massive oil, gas and mineral exploration plans in Greenland, touts national security benefits
Trump administration slashes time refugees have to challenge loss of legal status
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani says he won’t fire NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch despite socialist pressure
Trump signs pardons for Alaska diesel mechanics onstage during rally touting major energy deals
Trump Energy Department issues emergency order to prevent blackouts across 13 states amid unusual October heat
Florida executes inmate who killed cellmate because he wanted death penalty
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
