News • Opinons • Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Trump DOJ shores up anti-abortion groups’ support amid bid to salvage $1.8 billion Planned Parenthood lawsuit
Official Who Waged War on DEI Out at DOJ
NTSB recovers cockpit voice recorder from Learjet crash site in Florida
Iran Accused of Hacking French Supermarket Refrigerators in Latest Cyber Attacks: ‘Unprecedented’
Watch: Liam Neeson Unable to Hide His Disgust When He Learns How Netflix Is Butchering ‘Narnia’
Cry-Bullies: Hilarity Breaks Out When Anti-Semites Bullying Jewish Shop Owners Realize They Themselves Are About to Get Bullied
South Carolina dad left sleeping 6-year-old in line for Pokémon cards at Target: police
Dana White takes questions at podium during White House briefing with Trump
Jeffries vows Democrats won’t ‘give a dime’ to Trump’s deportation efforts
Watch: CNN Interview Blows Up in Garcia’s Face After He Talks About Stephen Miller’s Crimes, But Can’t Name Any… Twice
Trump tells DHS chief to work with Democrats on immigration reform, but no amnesty
Breaking: GOP Navy SEAL Vet Holds on to House Seat in Battleground State
Trump’s redistricting gamble faces reckoning as GOP holdouts claim vindication
ASRA NOMANI: El-Sayed glides into role as rock star of the hard left’s red-green alliance
SCOTUS allows Trump admin to temporarily resume border construction in Texas’ Big Bend
See also  Khanna touts new draft committee for likely 2028 presidential bid: ‘I’m honored’

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Trump DOJ shores up anti-abortion groups’ support amid bid to salvage $1.8 billion Planned Parenthood lawsuit
Official Who Waged War on DEI Out at DOJ
NTSB recovers cockpit voice recorder from Learjet crash site in Florida
Iran Accused of Hacking French Supermarket Refrigerators in Latest Cyber Attacks: ‘Unprecedented’
Watch: Liam Neeson Unable to Hide His Disgust When He Learns How Netflix Is Butchering ‘Narnia’
Cry-Bullies: Hilarity Breaks Out When Anti-Semites Bullying Jewish Shop Owners Realize They Themselves Are About to Get Bullied
South Carolina dad left sleeping 6-year-old in line for Pokémon cards at Target: police
Dana White takes questions at podium during White House briefing with Trump
Jeffries vows Democrats won’t ‘give a dime’ to Trump’s deportation efforts
Watch: CNN Interview Blows Up in Garcia’s Face After He Talks About Stephen Miller’s Crimes, But Can’t Name Any… Twice
Trump tells DHS chief to work with Democrats on immigration reform, but no amnesty
Breaking: GOP Navy SEAL Vet Holds on to House Seat in Battleground State
Trump’s redistricting gamble faces reckoning as GOP holdouts claim vindication
ASRA NOMANI: El-Sayed glides into role as rock star of the hard left’s red-green alliance
SCOTUS allows Trump admin to temporarily resume border construction in Texas’ Big Bend
See also  LePage’s Maine House race heads to ranked-choice voting

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Trump DOJ shores up anti-abortion groups’ support amid bid to salvage $1.8 billion Planned Parenthood lawsuit
Official Who Waged War on DEI Out at DOJ
NTSB recovers cockpit voice recorder from Learjet crash site in Florida
Iran Accused of Hacking French Supermarket Refrigerators in Latest Cyber Attacks: ‘Unprecedented’
Watch: Liam Neeson Unable to Hide His Disgust When He Learns How Netflix Is Butchering ‘Narnia’
Cry-Bullies: Hilarity Breaks Out When Anti-Semites Bullying Jewish Shop Owners Realize They Themselves Are About to Get Bullied
South Carolina dad left sleeping 6-year-old in line for Pokémon cards at Target: police
Dana White takes questions at podium during White House briefing with Trump
Jeffries vows Democrats won’t ‘give a dime’ to Trump’s deportation efforts
Watch: CNN Interview Blows Up in Garcia’s Face After He Talks About Stephen Miller’s Crimes, But Can’t Name Any… Twice
Trump tells DHS chief to work with Democrats on immigration reform, but no amnesty
Breaking: GOP Navy SEAL Vet Holds on to House Seat in Battleground State
Trump’s redistricting gamble faces reckoning as GOP holdouts claim vindication
ASRA NOMANI: El-Sayed glides into role as rock star of the hard left’s red-green alliance
SCOTUS allows Trump admin to temporarily resume border construction in Texas’ Big Bend
See also  Prosecutor overseeing Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ investigation resigns

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter


Discover more from ConservativeModern.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading