Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
Bill Barr calls on Senate GOP to confirm Todd Blanche for attorney general
New limited-edition US passport features Trump’s image and a warning
Judge Shuts Down Tyler Robinson’s Attempt to Dodge Death Penalty
Trump Says Iran Just Committed ‘a Foolish Violation of Our Ceasefire Agreement’
House Democrat lashes out when grilled on whether socialist victories would threaten Dem unity
Trump commission unveils 12-point blueprint to expand US religious liberty protections
Former youth pastor, Vegas yoga instructor charged in wife’s mystery death kills himself in custody: officials
Watch: JD Vance Has Hilarious ‘Note to Protesters’ Yelling at Him in a Foreign Language
DHS Delivers Bad News for 300,000 Haitians in the US: ‘It’s Closing Time’
New York City pours $15M into sex change initiatives as Mamdani accuses federal government of intimidation
Socialists sweep NYC as Americans balk at movement’s brutal catch: ‘Talk to immigrants’
Emailer in Nancy Guthrie case claims to possess video of ‘main guy’ with Savannah Guthrie’s mother
Clinton judge orders DOJ to unseal the Epstein files it has been keeping hidden
Pilot Teams Up with Daughter on His Final Flight for Southwest
Luigi Mangione’s team fires back at plea deal report, calls leaks threat to fair trial
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
Bill Barr calls on Senate GOP to confirm Todd Blanche for attorney general
New limited-edition US passport features Trump’s image and a warning
Judge Shuts Down Tyler Robinson’s Attempt to Dodge Death Penalty
Trump Says Iran Just Committed ‘a Foolish Violation of Our Ceasefire Agreement’
House Democrat lashes out when grilled on whether socialist victories would threaten Dem unity
Trump commission unveils 12-point blueprint to expand US religious liberty protections
Former youth pastor, Vegas yoga instructor charged in wife’s mystery death kills himself in custody: officials
Watch: JD Vance Has Hilarious ‘Note to Protesters’ Yelling at Him in a Foreign Language
DHS Delivers Bad News for 300,000 Haitians in the US: ‘It’s Closing Time’
New York City pours $15M into sex change initiatives as Mamdani accuses federal government of intimidation
Socialists sweep NYC as Americans balk at movement’s brutal catch: ‘Talk to immigrants’
Emailer in Nancy Guthrie case claims to possess video of ‘main guy’ with Savannah Guthrie’s mother
Clinton judge orders DOJ to unseal the Epstein files it has been keeping hidden
Pilot Teams Up with Daughter on His Final Flight for Southwest
Luigi Mangione’s team fires back at plea deal report, calls leaks threat to fair trial
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Bill Barr calls on Senate GOP to confirm Todd Blanche for attorney general
New limited-edition US passport features Trump’s image and a warning
Judge Shuts Down Tyler Robinson’s Attempt to Dodge Death Penalty
Trump Says Iran Just Committed ‘a Foolish Violation of Our Ceasefire Agreement’
House Democrat lashes out when grilled on whether socialist victories would threaten Dem unity
Trump commission unveils 12-point blueprint to expand US religious liberty protections
Former youth pastor, Vegas yoga instructor charged in wife’s mystery death kills himself in custody: officials
Watch: JD Vance Has Hilarious ‘Note to Protesters’ Yelling at Him in a Foreign Language
DHS Delivers Bad News for 300,000 Haitians in the US: ‘It’s Closing Time’
New York City pours $15M into sex change initiatives as Mamdani accuses federal government of intimidation
Socialists sweep NYC as Americans balk at movement’s brutal catch: ‘Talk to immigrants’
Emailer in Nancy Guthrie case claims to possess video of ‘main guy’ with Savannah Guthrie’s mother
Clinton judge orders DOJ to unseal the Epstein files it has been keeping hidden
Pilot Teams Up with Daughter on His Final Flight for Southwest
Luigi Mangione’s team fires back at plea deal report, calls leaks threat to fair trial
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
