Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
Tech Titan Blasted for Using AI to Come up With 3 Things That Makes Her Daughter Special on Her 10th Birthday
Watch: YouTuber Separates Conjoined Turtle Twins, Ends with ‘Heartbreaking’ Result
Americans forced to change clocks again as Senate stalls Trump-backed daylight saving time bill
Everything to know about House and Senate control, ballot measures and 2026 Election Day poll closing
‘Free Instacart for Welfare Queens’: California Begins Sending Out Luxury Food Boxes at Taxpayers’ Expense
California Mayor Allegedly Followed, Harassed, Blocked Car of Random Man She Thought Was ICE
Chuck Klosterman’s ‘Rock*’ is an exercise in fantastical pointlessness
Skilled trades now offer direct path to six-figure pay without college debt thanks to emerging tech industry
A look inside the Somali mall where Omar reappeared after DC raid raises more failed assimilation concerns
NYC woman critically injured after being stabbed multiple times while jogging along Brooklyn waterfront
Democrats’ self-inflicted wounds threaten high-stakes Michigan Senate race
Tough Time Finding an Affordable Car? Thank Obama’s Destruction of 680k Working Vehicles in 2009
Texas Claims 9 Rio Grande Islands in Power Move to Deny Cartels Safe Havens
College Hockey Star, Aspiring NYPD Cop Killed in Wrong-Way Crash: It Was a Twice-Deported Illegal Behind the Wheel
Tensions Heat Up in Taiwan Straight as China Shadows US Warship, Separate Maritime Standoff Erupts Near Taiwan
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
Tech Titan Blasted for Using AI to Come up With 3 Things That Makes Her Daughter Special on Her 10th Birthday
Watch: YouTuber Separates Conjoined Turtle Twins, Ends with ‘Heartbreaking’ Result
Americans forced to change clocks again as Senate stalls Trump-backed daylight saving time bill
Everything to know about House and Senate control, ballot measures and 2026 Election Day poll closing
‘Free Instacart for Welfare Queens’: California Begins Sending Out Luxury Food Boxes at Taxpayers’ Expense
California Mayor Allegedly Followed, Harassed, Blocked Car of Random Man She Thought Was ICE
Chuck Klosterman’s ‘Rock*’ is an exercise in fantastical pointlessness
Skilled trades now offer direct path to six-figure pay without college debt thanks to emerging tech industry
A look inside the Somali mall where Omar reappeared after DC raid raises more failed assimilation concerns
NYC woman critically injured after being stabbed multiple times while jogging along Brooklyn waterfront
Democrats’ self-inflicted wounds threaten high-stakes Michigan Senate race
Tough Time Finding an Affordable Car? Thank Obama’s Destruction of 680k Working Vehicles in 2009
Texas Claims 9 Rio Grande Islands in Power Move to Deny Cartels Safe Havens
College Hockey Star, Aspiring NYPD Cop Killed in Wrong-Way Crash: It Was a Twice-Deported Illegal Behind the Wheel
Tensions Heat Up in Taiwan Straight as China Shadows US Warship, Separate Maritime Standoff Erupts Near Taiwan
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Tech Titan Blasted for Using AI to Come up With 3 Things That Makes Her Daughter Special on Her 10th Birthday
Watch: YouTuber Separates Conjoined Turtle Twins, Ends with ‘Heartbreaking’ Result
Americans forced to change clocks again as Senate stalls Trump-backed daylight saving time bill
Everything to know about House and Senate control, ballot measures and 2026 Election Day poll closing
‘Free Instacart for Welfare Queens’: California Begins Sending Out Luxury Food Boxes at Taxpayers’ Expense
California Mayor Allegedly Followed, Harassed, Blocked Car of Random Man She Thought Was ICE
Chuck Klosterman’s ‘Rock*’ is an exercise in fantastical pointlessness
Skilled trades now offer direct path to six-figure pay without college debt thanks to emerging tech industry
A look inside the Somali mall where Omar reappeared after DC raid raises more failed assimilation concerns
NYC woman critically injured after being stabbed multiple times while jogging along Brooklyn waterfront
Democrats’ self-inflicted wounds threaten high-stakes Michigan Senate race
Tough Time Finding an Affordable Car? Thank Obama’s Destruction of 680k Working Vehicles in 2009
Texas Claims 9 Rio Grande Islands in Power Move to Deny Cartels Safe Havens
College Hockey Star, Aspiring NYPD Cop Killed in Wrong-Way Crash: It Was a Twice-Deported Illegal Behind the Wheel
Tensions Heat Up in Taiwan Straight as China Shadows US Warship, Separate Maritime Standoff Erupts Near Taiwan
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
