News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Georgia teen arrested after father turns him in following pair of shootings, police say
Cause of death revealed weeks after woman died following Universal Orlando ride: report
Gov Whitmer says America ‘ready for a woman president,’ contrasting Michelle Obama
Air Force One turns around shortly after takeoff for Trump’s trip to Switzerland
Lindsey Halligan leaves US attorney post after weeks of judicial scrutiny
Former Trump lawyer accuses federal judge of making ‘baseless accusations of lying’ after departure
Missouri couple accused of locking teens in chicken pen, shooting them with BB guns in abuse case
House passes AI education bill for small businesses in landslide 395-14 vote
Cities Church Issues Full-Throated Response to Invasion of their Sunday Worship Service by Leftist Agitators
Nationwide walkout draws thousands into streets on anniversary of Trump’s inauguration
Bondi vows accountability after church attack, says Minnesota ‘a mess right now’
Illegal immigrant allegedly ran from deadly wrong-way DUI crash that killed motorcyclist, records show
DHS says ICE agents rammed by vehicles amid Minneapolis enforcement surge: ‘Aggressively assaulted’
Ilhan Omar vows ‘not to give ICE a single cent’ in heated congressional funding fight
ALERT: Dem Rep Publicly Supports Assault on Christian Worship Service by Leftist Agitators
See also  Somali fraudster convicted in Feeding Our Future scheme tied to recent recipient of Minnesota funding

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Georgia teen arrested after father turns him in following pair of shootings, police say
Cause of death revealed weeks after woman died following Universal Orlando ride: report
Gov Whitmer says America ‘ready for a woman president,’ contrasting Michelle Obama
Air Force One turns around shortly after takeoff for Trump’s trip to Switzerland
Lindsey Halligan leaves US attorney post after weeks of judicial scrutiny
Former Trump lawyer accuses federal judge of making ‘baseless accusations of lying’ after departure
Missouri couple accused of locking teens in chicken pen, shooting them with BB guns in abuse case
House passes AI education bill for small businesses in landslide 395-14 vote
Cities Church Issues Full-Throated Response to Invasion of their Sunday Worship Service by Leftist Agitators
Nationwide walkout draws thousands into streets on anniversary of Trump’s inauguration
Bondi vows accountability after church attack, says Minnesota ‘a mess right now’
Illegal immigrant allegedly ran from deadly wrong-way DUI crash that killed motorcyclist, records show
DHS says ICE agents rammed by vehicles amid Minneapolis enforcement surge: ‘Aggressively assaulted’
Ilhan Omar vows ‘not to give ICE a single cent’ in heated congressional funding fight
ALERT: Dem Rep Publicly Supports Assault on Christian Worship Service by Leftist Agitators
See also  Guerrilla-like ‘ICE Watch’ groups backed by top, left-wing grantmakers

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Georgia teen arrested after father turns him in following pair of shootings, police say
Cause of death revealed weeks after woman died following Universal Orlando ride: report
Gov Whitmer says America ‘ready for a woman president,’ contrasting Michelle Obama
Air Force One turns around shortly after takeoff for Trump’s trip to Switzerland
Lindsey Halligan leaves US attorney post after weeks of judicial scrutiny
Former Trump lawyer accuses federal judge of making ‘baseless accusations of lying’ after departure
Missouri couple accused of locking teens in chicken pen, shooting them with BB guns in abuse case
House passes AI education bill for small businesses in landslide 395-14 vote
Cities Church Issues Full-Throated Response to Invasion of their Sunday Worship Service by Leftist Agitators
Nationwide walkout draws thousands into streets on anniversary of Trump’s inauguration
Bondi vows accountability after church attack, says Minnesota ‘a mess right now’
Illegal immigrant allegedly ran from deadly wrong-way DUI crash that killed motorcyclist, records show
DHS says ICE agents rammed by vehicles amid Minneapolis enforcement surge: ‘Aggressively assaulted’
Ilhan Omar vows ‘not to give ICE a single cent’ in heated congressional funding fight
ALERT: Dem Rep Publicly Supports Assault on Christian Worship Service by Leftist Agitators
See also  House GOP revisits Biden handling of Jan. 6 with new panel

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter