News • Opinons • Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Former FBI officials charged with lying to Congress about Hunter Biden investigations
Sheriff says evidence ‘leaning one way’ in shooting deaths of disabled toddler and grandparents: report
Israel shuts down West Bank after two soliders shot dead by Palestinian gunmen
Ilhan Omar hit with expulsion threat as GOP lawmaker vows to boot her from Congress over DOJ probe
The United States of Fraud: California Scheme Used Homeless, Elderly People to Steal Billions
Breaking: Israel Orders Full West Bank Lockdown After IDF Troops Stop Terror Attack
EXCLUSIVE: Fed timeline challenges reports of migrant baby facing immigration judge alone
France prepares for another round of weekend protests
Ilhan Omar birth name questions could have far-reaching legal implications and more top headlines
House Democrats make push for western Michigan seat that’s long been a GOP stronghold
Maryland ballot measure aims to eliminate the state’s last GOP-held House district
Trump sidelines sweeping Russia sanctions as GOP allies warn pressure on Putin is slipping
Trump pushback, Biden ‘disaster’ and gender surprise: 5 key moments from Kansas Senate debate
Michigan Senate race draws presidential-level star power in final stretch
Antifa supporter charged with stealing GOP campaign signs in NY race to replace Stefanik
See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Former FBI officials charged with lying to Congress about Hunter Biden investigations
Sheriff says evidence ‘leaning one way’ in shooting deaths of disabled toddler and grandparents: report
Israel shuts down West Bank after two soliders shot dead by Palestinian gunmen
Ilhan Omar hit with expulsion threat as GOP lawmaker vows to boot her from Congress over DOJ probe
The United States of Fraud: California Scheme Used Homeless, Elderly People to Steal Billions
Breaking: Israel Orders Full West Bank Lockdown After IDF Troops Stop Terror Attack
EXCLUSIVE: Fed timeline challenges reports of migrant baby facing immigration judge alone
France prepares for another round of weekend protests
Ilhan Omar birth name questions could have far-reaching legal implications and more top headlines
House Democrats make push for western Michigan seat that’s long been a GOP stronghold
Maryland ballot measure aims to eliminate the state’s last GOP-held House district
Trump sidelines sweeping Russia sanctions as GOP allies warn pressure on Putin is slipping
Trump pushback, Biden ‘disaster’ and gender surprise: 5 key moments from Kansas Senate debate
Michigan Senate race draws presidential-level star power in final stretch
Antifa supporter charged with stealing GOP campaign signs in NY race to replace Stefanik
See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Former FBI officials charged with lying to Congress about Hunter Biden investigations
Sheriff says evidence ‘leaning one way’ in shooting deaths of disabled toddler and grandparents: report
Israel shuts down West Bank after two soliders shot dead by Palestinian gunmen
Ilhan Omar hit with expulsion threat as GOP lawmaker vows to boot her from Congress over DOJ probe
The United States of Fraud: California Scheme Used Homeless, Elderly People to Steal Billions
Breaking: Israel Orders Full West Bank Lockdown After IDF Troops Stop Terror Attack
EXCLUSIVE: Fed timeline challenges reports of migrant baby facing immigration judge alone
France prepares for another round of weekend protests
Ilhan Omar birth name questions could have far-reaching legal implications and more top headlines
House Democrats make push for western Michigan seat that’s long been a GOP stronghold
Maryland ballot measure aims to eliminate the state’s last GOP-held House district
Trump sidelines sweeping Russia sanctions as GOP allies warn pressure on Putin is slipping
Trump pushback, Biden ‘disaster’ and gender surprise: 5 key moments from Kansas Senate debate
Michigan Senate race draws presidential-level star power in final stretch
Antifa supporter charged with stealing GOP campaign signs in NY race to replace Stefanik
See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter


Discover more from ConservativeModern.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading