News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



VIDEO: Suspected Antifa Surgical Strike Leaves Conservative Streamer’s Wife, Bedroom Soaked in Chemical Irritant
Smithsonian’s American History Museum Engages In ‘Extreme Political Activism,’ New White House Report Concludes
Macron addresses ‘elements of risk’ in Syria’s reintegration after bomb goes off outside his hotel
Trump welcomed with pomp and pageantry by Turkey’s Erdogan at NATO
Nigel Farage to resign, run again for Parliament in ‘people vs. the establishment’ by-election
Manhattan high-rise evacuated as officials warn of potential collapse
Trump taunts Meloni with fresh photo salvo as NATO summit puts allies face-to-face
Trump could hand prized stealth jets to NATO ally once seen as alliance headache
Operation Epic Fury fallout looms over Trump’s private talks with NATO allies and more top headlines
Extremist streamer declares NYC an Islamic republic with popular terror chant: ‘Mamdani’s New York’
Dem senator accused of being ‘nowhere to be found’ on crucial issue impacting kids in swing state
Democrats abandon embattled candidate Graham Platner after rape allegation implodes Senate bid
WATCH: Ex-Warren campaign volunteer spotted praising murderous ex-Iranian leader
Charlie Kirk’s family comes face to face with accused assassin for first time
New Yorker suing ICE after officers went to his home to warn him over criticism of agency
See also  Thunderbirds to race cars: Inside Horsepower of America at the Great American State Fair

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


VIDEO: Suspected Antifa Surgical Strike Leaves Conservative Streamer’s Wife, Bedroom Soaked in Chemical Irritant
Smithsonian’s American History Museum Engages In ‘Extreme Political Activism,’ New White House Report Concludes
Macron addresses ‘elements of risk’ in Syria’s reintegration after bomb goes off outside his hotel
Trump welcomed with pomp and pageantry by Turkey’s Erdogan at NATO
Nigel Farage to resign, run again for Parliament in ‘people vs. the establishment’ by-election
Manhattan high-rise evacuated as officials warn of potential collapse
Trump taunts Meloni with fresh photo salvo as NATO summit puts allies face-to-face
Trump could hand prized stealth jets to NATO ally once seen as alliance headache
Operation Epic Fury fallout looms over Trump’s private talks with NATO allies and more top headlines
Extremist streamer declares NYC an Islamic republic with popular terror chant: ‘Mamdani’s New York’
Dem senator accused of being ‘nowhere to be found’ on crucial issue impacting kids in swing state
Democrats abandon embattled candidate Graham Platner after rape allegation implodes Senate bid
WATCH: Ex-Warren campaign volunteer spotted praising murderous ex-Iranian leader
Charlie Kirk’s family comes face to face with accused assassin for first time
New Yorker suing ICE after officers went to his home to warn him over criticism of agency
See also  Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce take over Madison Square Garden, shut down Midtown Manhattan

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


VIDEO: Suspected Antifa Surgical Strike Leaves Conservative Streamer’s Wife, Bedroom Soaked in Chemical Irritant
Smithsonian’s American History Museum Engages In ‘Extreme Political Activism,’ New White House Report Concludes
Macron addresses ‘elements of risk’ in Syria’s reintegration after bomb goes off outside his hotel
Trump welcomed with pomp and pageantry by Turkey’s Erdogan at NATO
Nigel Farage to resign, run again for Parliament in ‘people vs. the establishment’ by-election
Manhattan high-rise evacuated as officials warn of potential collapse
Trump taunts Meloni with fresh photo salvo as NATO summit puts allies face-to-face
Trump could hand prized stealth jets to NATO ally once seen as alliance headache
Operation Epic Fury fallout looms over Trump’s private talks with NATO allies and more top headlines
Extremist streamer declares NYC an Islamic republic with popular terror chant: ‘Mamdani’s New York’
Dem senator accused of being ‘nowhere to be found’ on crucial issue impacting kids in swing state
Democrats abandon embattled candidate Graham Platner after rape allegation implodes Senate bid
WATCH: Ex-Warren campaign volunteer spotted praising murderous ex-Iranian leader
Charlie Kirk’s family comes face to face with accused assassin for first time
New Yorker suing ICE after officers went to his home to warn him over criticism of agency
See also  Before 1776: Rediscovering America’s first chapter at Jamestown

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter