News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Dems sidestep past ‘refuse illegal orders’ demands as they challenge Trump’s Iran war authority
Iran could use detained Americans as ‘sweetener’ in nuclear talks, ex-hostage envoy warns
Air Force Academy’s ‘CULEX’ puts thousands of cadets through realistic 24-hour combat simulation
Trump set to read Scripture from the Oval Office during ‘America Reads the Bible’ event starting Sunday
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Dem teachers groom ‘foot soldiers,’ justice served to anti-Israel group
RFK Jr clashes with Dem lawmaker over Trump’s mental fitness in heated exchange
Gold Star father says prior Afghanistan review smelled ‘like a cover-up’ as new look examines millions of docs
Fact Check: Did Pete Hegseth Accidentally Quote a ‘Fake Bible Verse from Pulp Fiction’?
Skeletal remains found by hikers in Washington state woods identified as woman missing since 2024
Two boys dead after illegal immigrant from Mexico allegedly drove drunk and hit them on a sidewalk
Grieving mothers scorch Dem lawmaker after he pivots during hearing to attack ‘MAGA Republicans’
Newsom PAC bought thousands of memoir copies about his hardships, juicing sales
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Brian Hooker’s release, Tyler Robinson’s ATF report, DNA in Guthrie case
Report: California Using Taxpayer Funds to Give Homeless Transgender Illegals Sex Changes
Iran Has ‘Agreed to Everything,’ Trump Says
See also  Ranking the 2028 Democratic hopefuls at Al Sharpton’s National Action Network

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Dems sidestep past ‘refuse illegal orders’ demands as they challenge Trump’s Iran war authority
Iran could use detained Americans as ‘sweetener’ in nuclear talks, ex-hostage envoy warns
Air Force Academy’s ‘CULEX’ puts thousands of cadets through realistic 24-hour combat simulation
Trump set to read Scripture from the Oval Office during ‘America Reads the Bible’ event starting Sunday
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Dem teachers groom ‘foot soldiers,’ justice served to anti-Israel group
RFK Jr clashes with Dem lawmaker over Trump’s mental fitness in heated exchange
Gold Star father says prior Afghanistan review smelled ‘like a cover-up’ as new look examines millions of docs
Fact Check: Did Pete Hegseth Accidentally Quote a ‘Fake Bible Verse from Pulp Fiction’?
Skeletal remains found by hikers in Washington state woods identified as woman missing since 2024
Two boys dead after illegal immigrant from Mexico allegedly drove drunk and hit them on a sidewalk
Grieving mothers scorch Dem lawmaker after he pivots during hearing to attack ‘MAGA Republicans’
Newsom PAC bought thousands of memoir copies about his hardships, juicing sales
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Brian Hooker’s release, Tyler Robinson’s ATF report, DNA in Guthrie case
Report: California Using Taxpayer Funds to Give Homeless Transgender Illegals Sex Changes
Iran Has ‘Agreed to Everything,’ Trump Says
See also  Whistleblower contacted Democrats before filing Trump complaint that led to first impeachment, records show 

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Dems sidestep past ‘refuse illegal orders’ demands as they challenge Trump’s Iran war authority
Iran could use detained Americans as ‘sweetener’ in nuclear talks, ex-hostage envoy warns
Air Force Academy’s ‘CULEX’ puts thousands of cadets through realistic 24-hour combat simulation
Trump set to read Scripture from the Oval Office during ‘America Reads the Bible’ event starting Sunday
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Dem teachers groom ‘foot soldiers,’ justice served to anti-Israel group
RFK Jr clashes with Dem lawmaker over Trump’s mental fitness in heated exchange
Gold Star father says prior Afghanistan review smelled ‘like a cover-up’ as new look examines millions of docs
Fact Check: Did Pete Hegseth Accidentally Quote a ‘Fake Bible Verse from Pulp Fiction’?
Skeletal remains found by hikers in Washington state woods identified as woman missing since 2024
Two boys dead after illegal immigrant from Mexico allegedly drove drunk and hit them on a sidewalk
Grieving mothers scorch Dem lawmaker after he pivots during hearing to attack ‘MAGA Republicans’
Newsom PAC bought thousands of memoir copies about his hardships, juicing sales
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Brian Hooker’s release, Tyler Robinson’s ATF report, DNA in Guthrie case
Report: California Using Taxpayer Funds to Give Homeless Transgender Illegals Sex Changes
Iran Has ‘Agreed to Everything,’ Trump Says
See also  Virginia redistricting referendum tightens into a dead heat as early voting surges

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter