News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Republicans narrowly reject efforts to handcuff Trump’s war powers in Venezuela
Patel reveals bizarre ‘self-awarded’ trophy former FBI officials made to celebrate Trump probe
NYT: Murder Rate Hits 125-Year Low in Trump’s First Year Back in Office — Biggest Single-Year Drop Ever
Jack Smith dodges questions on Cassidy Hutchinson witness credibility
Paris Hilton teams up with AOC to push House to pass stalled AI deepfake porn bill
Top AZ county lawyer fired after dad accuses him of filming 12-year-old at store, performing sex act in car
Anti-abortion groups keep pressure on White House after March for Life olive branch
Mattel’s Autistic Barbie – Fidget Spinner and All – Draws Fire from Critics as Fans Rave: ‘So Cool and So Beautiful’
White House, DHS push back on claims ICE targeted 5-year-old in Minnesota, say child was ‘abandoned’
Zelenskyy blasts global inaction on Iran, claims Europe stuck in ‘Greenland mode’
Convicted Minnesota fraudster alleges Walz, Ellison were aware of widespread fraud
Glenn Beck Calls on Trump to Fire Pam Bondi After a Year on the Job, Cites Lack of Major Prosecutions
BREAKING: Minnesota Judge Refuses to Sign Criminal Complaint Charging Don Lemon for Storming Church
Newsom posts himself as ‘Sparkle Beach’ Ken Barbie doll in clap back at Bessent
It’s Gotten Worse: New MRC Study Shows Media Bias Against Trump Has Hit New High – More Than 9/10 at Times
See also  Guerrilla-like ‘ICE Watch’ groups backed by top, left-wing grantmakers

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Republicans narrowly reject efforts to handcuff Trump’s war powers in Venezuela
Patel reveals bizarre ‘self-awarded’ trophy former FBI officials made to celebrate Trump probe
NYT: Murder Rate Hits 125-Year Low in Trump’s First Year Back in Office — Biggest Single-Year Drop Ever
Jack Smith dodges questions on Cassidy Hutchinson witness credibility
Paris Hilton teams up with AOC to push House to pass stalled AI deepfake porn bill
Top AZ county lawyer fired after dad accuses him of filming 12-year-old at store, performing sex act in car
Anti-abortion groups keep pressure on White House after March for Life olive branch
Mattel’s Autistic Barbie – Fidget Spinner and All – Draws Fire from Critics as Fans Rave: ‘So Cool and So Beautiful’
White House, DHS push back on claims ICE targeted 5-year-old in Minnesota, say child was ‘abandoned’
Zelenskyy blasts global inaction on Iran, claims Europe stuck in ‘Greenland mode’
Convicted Minnesota fraudster alleges Walz, Ellison were aware of widespread fraud
Glenn Beck Calls on Trump to Fire Pam Bondi After a Year on the Job, Cites Lack of Major Prosecutions
BREAKING: Minnesota Judge Refuses to Sign Criminal Complaint Charging Don Lemon for Storming Church
Newsom posts himself as ‘Sparkle Beach’ Ken Barbie doll in clap back at Bessent
It’s Gotten Worse: New MRC Study Shows Media Bias Against Trump Has Hit New High – More Than 9/10 at Times
See also  What will Trump’s Greenland obsession mean for the future of NATO?

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Republicans narrowly reject efforts to handcuff Trump’s war powers in Venezuela
Patel reveals bizarre ‘self-awarded’ trophy former FBI officials made to celebrate Trump probe
NYT: Murder Rate Hits 125-Year Low in Trump’s First Year Back in Office — Biggest Single-Year Drop Ever
Jack Smith dodges questions on Cassidy Hutchinson witness credibility
Paris Hilton teams up with AOC to push House to pass stalled AI deepfake porn bill
Top AZ county lawyer fired after dad accuses him of filming 12-year-old at store, performing sex act in car
Anti-abortion groups keep pressure on White House after March for Life olive branch
Mattel’s Autistic Barbie – Fidget Spinner and All – Draws Fire from Critics as Fans Rave: ‘So Cool and So Beautiful’
White House, DHS push back on claims ICE targeted 5-year-old in Minnesota, say child was ‘abandoned’
Zelenskyy blasts global inaction on Iran, claims Europe stuck in ‘Greenland mode’
Convicted Minnesota fraudster alleges Walz, Ellison were aware of widespread fraud
Glenn Beck Calls on Trump to Fire Pam Bondi After a Year on the Job, Cites Lack of Major Prosecutions
BREAKING: Minnesota Judge Refuses to Sign Criminal Complaint Charging Don Lemon for Storming Church
Newsom posts himself as ‘Sparkle Beach’ Ken Barbie doll in clap back at Bessent
It’s Gotten Worse: New MRC Study Shows Media Bias Against Trump Has Hit New High – More Than 9/10 at Times
See also  Organizer of GoFundMe for ‘agitating the Nazis’ involved in anti-ICE uprising at Minneapolis church

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter