Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.
House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.
Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.
HHS probing hospital over firing of nurse who blew whistle on minors getting gender treatments
Boom, You Rang?
Radical activist who fueled Cori Bush’s campaigns emerges as spokesperson for track star’s murder suspect
Biden’s Secret Harvard Meeting Goes Disastrously Thanks to Gaffes, Ice Cream Snafu
Menendez brothers attorney’s focus on grisly photos part of strategic defense play to free killers: experts
New England serial killer: CT River Valley survivor stabbed 27 times warns locals to remain ‘vigilant’
Trump: China calling ‘a lot’ since last week’s tariff increase, deal could happen as soon as 3 weeks
Bribery trial of Nadine Menendez reaches closing arguments: ‘Partner in crime’
Dem Senator Van Hollen meets, shakes hands with Abrego Garcia; El Salvador says inmate will remain in custody
Ohio man arrested after investigators discover IED, videos, photos of bomb-making materials
Van Hollen meets with Abrego Garcia after several failed attempts
Trump Reveals Why Jimmy Carter ‘Died a Happy Man’: The Punch Line Will Have You in Stitches
Letitia James launches high-dollar fundraiser after alleged mortgage fraud case
Thomas Massie Under Fire After He Sounds the Alarm on Real ID Laws Trump Wants
HUD puts half-occupied headquarters building in DC up for sale
The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.
On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”
This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.
HHS probing hospital over firing of nurse who blew whistle on minors getting gender treatments
Boom, You Rang?
Radical activist who fueled Cori Bush’s campaigns emerges as spokesperson for track star’s murder suspect
Biden’s Secret Harvard Meeting Goes Disastrously Thanks to Gaffes, Ice Cream Snafu
Menendez brothers attorney’s focus on grisly photos part of strategic defense play to free killers: experts
New England serial killer: CT River Valley survivor stabbed 27 times warns locals to remain ‘vigilant’
Trump: China calling ‘a lot’ since last week’s tariff increase, deal could happen as soon as 3 weeks
Bribery trial of Nadine Menendez reaches closing arguments: ‘Partner in crime’
Dem Senator Van Hollen meets, shakes hands with Abrego Garcia; El Salvador says inmate will remain in custody
Ohio man arrested after investigators discover IED, videos, photos of bomb-making materials
Van Hollen meets with Abrego Garcia after several failed attempts
Trump Reveals Why Jimmy Carter ‘Died a Happy Man’: The Punch Line Will Have You in Stitches
Letitia James launches high-dollar fundraiser after alleged mortgage fraud case
Thomas Massie Under Fire After He Sounds the Alarm on Real ID Laws Trump Wants
HUD puts half-occupied headquarters building in DC up for sale
In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.
Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.
A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.
The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
HHS probing hospital over firing of nurse who blew whistle on minors getting gender treatments
Boom, You Rang?
Radical activist who fueled Cori Bush’s campaigns emerges as spokesperson for track star’s murder suspect
Biden’s Secret Harvard Meeting Goes Disastrously Thanks to Gaffes, Ice Cream Snafu
Menendez brothers attorney’s focus on grisly photos part of strategic defense play to free killers: experts
New England serial killer: CT River Valley survivor stabbed 27 times warns locals to remain ‘vigilant’
Trump: China calling ‘a lot’ since last week’s tariff increase, deal could happen as soon as 3 weeks
Bribery trial of Nadine Menendez reaches closing arguments: ‘Partner in crime’
Dem Senator Van Hollen meets, shakes hands with Abrego Garcia; El Salvador says inmate will remain in custody
Ohio man arrested after investigators discover IED, videos, photos of bomb-making materials
Van Hollen meets with Abrego Garcia after several failed attempts
Trump Reveals Why Jimmy Carter ‘Died a Happy Man’: The Punch Line Will Have You in Stitches
Letitia James launches high-dollar fundraiser after alleged mortgage fraud case
Thomas Massie Under Fire After He Sounds the Alarm on Real ID Laws Trump Wants
HUD puts half-occupied headquarters building in DC up for sale
The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Story cited here.
