News • Opinons • Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Jordanian Military Goes After Targets in Syria in Response to Terrorists Killing Christians
DHS Shuts Down Major Chinese Birth Tourism Loophole in US Pacific Territory
175 Democrats demand Trump admin stop Ilhan Omar investigation, warn it could hurt her re-election bid
Shouting match erupts at UN as Cuban foreign minister moves toward US ambassador’s podium: ‘Back up!’
Trump administration ‘monitoring’ leftist organizers ignoring new terrorism sanctions: State Department official
90 Percent of Largest United Methodist Church Congregation Votes to Leave Denomination – But It Won’t Be Easy
Hundreds of staged armed robberies helped thousands pose as crime victims in US immigration scam: DOJ
The Thing That Never Happens: DOJ Says Hundreds of Foreigners Voted in Multiple US Elections
House report says NYC prosecutors tailored plea deals to shield illegal immigrants from deportation
Norway and Finland break norms by phoning Putin directly to urge breakthroughs at trilateral talks
Multi-state manhunt underway as murder victim’s close friend fears escaped killer could strike again
FBI raids Beverly Hills mansion as part of Eric Swalwell investigation
WNBA Players Run Off the Court Again Before National Anthem Ahead of Monday Finals Game
Ilhan Omar Tells Hasan Piker She Is Being Targeted Because She’s Good-Looking
Fox News Power Rankings: As Iran looms large, can the GOP keep the faithful?
See also  What are the most expensive midterm races?

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Jordanian Military Goes After Targets in Syria in Response to Terrorists Killing Christians
DHS Shuts Down Major Chinese Birth Tourism Loophole in US Pacific Territory
175 Democrats demand Trump admin stop Ilhan Omar investigation, warn it could hurt her re-election bid
Shouting match erupts at UN as Cuban foreign minister moves toward US ambassador’s podium: ‘Back up!’
Trump administration ‘monitoring’ leftist organizers ignoring new terrorism sanctions: State Department official
90 Percent of Largest United Methodist Church Congregation Votes to Leave Denomination – But It Won’t Be Easy
Hundreds of staged armed robberies helped thousands pose as crime victims in US immigration scam: DOJ
The Thing That Never Happens: DOJ Says Hundreds of Foreigners Voted in Multiple US Elections
House report says NYC prosecutors tailored plea deals to shield illegal immigrants from deportation
Norway and Finland break norms by phoning Putin directly to urge breakthroughs at trilateral talks
Multi-state manhunt underway as murder victim’s close friend fears escaped killer could strike again
FBI raids Beverly Hills mansion as part of Eric Swalwell investigation
WNBA Players Run Off the Court Again Before National Anthem Ahead of Monday Finals Game
Ilhan Omar Tells Hasan Piker She Is Being Targeted Because She’s Good-Looking
Fox News Power Rankings: As Iran looms large, can the GOP keep the faithful?
See also  What are the most expensive midterm races?

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Jordanian Military Goes After Targets in Syria in Response to Terrorists Killing Christians
DHS Shuts Down Major Chinese Birth Tourism Loophole in US Pacific Territory
175 Democrats demand Trump admin stop Ilhan Omar investigation, warn it could hurt her re-election bid
Shouting match erupts at UN as Cuban foreign minister moves toward US ambassador’s podium: ‘Back up!’
Trump administration ‘monitoring’ leftist organizers ignoring new terrorism sanctions: State Department official
90 Percent of Largest United Methodist Church Congregation Votes to Leave Denomination – But It Won’t Be Easy
Hundreds of staged armed robberies helped thousands pose as crime victims in US immigration scam: DOJ
The Thing That Never Happens: DOJ Says Hundreds of Foreigners Voted in Multiple US Elections
House report says NYC prosecutors tailored plea deals to shield illegal immigrants from deportation
Norway and Finland break norms by phoning Putin directly to urge breakthroughs at trilateral talks
Multi-state manhunt underway as murder victim’s close friend fears escaped killer could strike again
FBI raids Beverly Hills mansion as part of Eric Swalwell investigation
WNBA Players Run Off the Court Again Before National Anthem Ahead of Monday Finals Game
Ilhan Omar Tells Hasan Piker She Is Being Targeted Because She’s Good-Looking
Fox News Power Rankings: As Iran looms large, can the GOP keep the faithful?
See also  What are the most expensive midterm races?

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter


Discover more from ConservativeModern.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading