News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



GOP Senator Does Deep Dive on Trump Assassination Attempt and Remains Troubled by ‘Unresolved’ Questions
DHS unloads on anti-ICE Dems after man arrested with manifesto, ‘disturbing’ alleged plot to kill agents
Grand Jury Delivers Decision on Indictments for Democrats Known as the ‘Seditious Six’
Hispanic conservatives accuse House GOP hopeful of defrauding donors and activists
McConnell released from hospital after health scare, to work from home as key DHS vote looms
Democrats rip Bondi over handling of Epstein case in rowdy House hearing
Bondi has tense exchanges with lawmakers in first House hearing since confirmation
Exclusive: FBI captures longtime fugitive in Honduras in connection with 2000 killing of Philadelphia girl
Retail records could unmask potential subject in Nancy Guthrie case as experts reveal ‘clothing is evidence’
Trump Religious Liberty Commission boots member after contentious antisemitism hearing
Hardline conservatives double down to save the SAVE Act
Trump Keeps Winning: President Takes Victory Lap After Latest Job Numbers Shatter Expectations
Indicted Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver Suggests Acting ICE Director Is Doomed to Hell as Hearing Spirals Out of Control
ICE director refuses to resign under pressure from Eric Swalwell not to ‘side with killers’
Tillis rips ‘political lawfare’ and praises grand jury after Dems avoid charges in ‘illegal orders’ case
See also  Judge says Abrego Garcia Supreme Court ruling may shape Venezuelan deportation case

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


GOP Senator Does Deep Dive on Trump Assassination Attempt and Remains Troubled by ‘Unresolved’ Questions
DHS unloads on anti-ICE Dems after man arrested with manifesto, ‘disturbing’ alleged plot to kill agents
Grand Jury Delivers Decision on Indictments for Democrats Known as the ‘Seditious Six’
Hispanic conservatives accuse House GOP hopeful of defrauding donors and activists
McConnell released from hospital after health scare, to work from home as key DHS vote looms
Democrats rip Bondi over handling of Epstein case in rowdy House hearing
Bondi has tense exchanges with lawmakers in first House hearing since confirmation
Exclusive: FBI captures longtime fugitive in Honduras in connection with 2000 killing of Philadelphia girl
Retail records could unmask potential subject in Nancy Guthrie case as experts reveal ‘clothing is evidence’
Trump Religious Liberty Commission boots member after contentious antisemitism hearing
Hardline conservatives double down to save the SAVE Act
Trump Keeps Winning: President Takes Victory Lap After Latest Job Numbers Shatter Expectations
Indicted Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver Suggests Acting ICE Director Is Doomed to Hell as Hearing Spirals Out of Control
ICE director refuses to resign under pressure from Eric Swalwell not to ‘side with killers’
Tillis rips ‘political lawfare’ and praises grand jury after Dems avoid charges in ‘illegal orders’ case
See also  The 2028 Democratic presidential contender must-have accessory: a tell-all book

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


GOP Senator Does Deep Dive on Trump Assassination Attempt and Remains Troubled by ‘Unresolved’ Questions
DHS unloads on anti-ICE Dems after man arrested with manifesto, ‘disturbing’ alleged plot to kill agents
Grand Jury Delivers Decision on Indictments for Democrats Known as the ‘Seditious Six’
Hispanic conservatives accuse House GOP hopeful of defrauding donors and activists
McConnell released from hospital after health scare, to work from home as key DHS vote looms
Democrats rip Bondi over handling of Epstein case in rowdy House hearing
Bondi has tense exchanges with lawmakers in first House hearing since confirmation
Exclusive: FBI captures longtime fugitive in Honduras in connection with 2000 killing of Philadelphia girl
Retail records could unmask potential subject in Nancy Guthrie case as experts reveal ‘clothing is evidence’
Trump Religious Liberty Commission boots member after contentious antisemitism hearing
Hardline conservatives double down to save the SAVE Act
Trump Keeps Winning: President Takes Victory Lap After Latest Job Numbers Shatter Expectations
Indicted Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver Suggests Acting ICE Director Is Doomed to Hell as Hearing Spirals Out of Control
ICE director refuses to resign under pressure from Eric Swalwell not to ‘side with killers’
Tillis rips ‘political lawfare’ and praises grand jury after Dems avoid charges in ‘illegal orders’ case
See also  Judge says Abrego Garcia Supreme Court ruling may shape Venezuelan deportation case

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter