News Opinons Politics

Obama Judge: Congress Can Subpoena Trump’s Personal Finances

Another federal judge appointed by Barack Obama has ruled that House Democrats can subpoena President Donald Trump’s personal and business finance records, with Wednesday’s decision from New York following on the heels of a similar Monday ruling from a court in Washington, D.C.

House Democrats are pursuing members of the president’s family and private family-owned businesses, demanding banking records and financial statements. As part of this partisan attack strategy, two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives controlled by Democrats – the Financial Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence – issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capitol One Bank for at least ten years of records involving President Trump’s children, the children’s spouses, and various family businesses including the Trump Organization.

Those committees are led by two of the most partisan actors in Congress: Rep. Maxine Waters chairs the Finance Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff chairs the Intelligence Committee. Both California Democrats have been outspoken in their fierce opposition to the president. Waters was among the first Democrats demanding the president’s impeachment. Schiff claimed to have evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians, though he has refused to produce such evidence and Special Counsel Robert Mueller found none.



Illegal’s dragging of ICE agent shows the exact danger the officer who shot Renee Good feared, expert says
The Iran Strikes Have Flooded X with So Much AI Disinformation That I Went Crawling Back to Cable News
‘Blankies,’ ICE tactics and luxury jets: Top moments from Noem’s House testimony
Op-Ed: America’s Education Crisis, and How to Solve It
Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital
DOJ quietly closes autopen investigation targeting Biden and aides
Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire
GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge
Unearthed video shows Dem candidate supporting ‘reallocation’ of police funding to social service programs
Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns
Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected
BREAKING: Senate Rejects Dems’ War Powers Resolution Trying to Tie Trump’s Hands on Iran
DHS defends McLaughlin against allegations husband’s company profited millions from ad contracts: ‘Baseless’
Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who died by suicide: ‘Lapse in judgment’
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Feels the Heat During Fraud Hearing in DC: ‘You Should Go to Jail’
See also  UN nuclear watchdog says Iran nuclear site damaged in strikes

The Trump family hired the powerhouse boutique law firm Consovoy McCarthy Park to fight the subpoenas in court. Lead counsel William Consovoy, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and a rising conservative star in national legal circles, filed suit in federal district court in New York City, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request for an injunction. Ramos wrote in his 25-page opinion that these subpoenas are part of “the power of Congress to conduct investigations … inherent in the legislative process.”

This is the second such ruling this week. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed accounting records on Donald Trump’s personal finances and business records held by an accounting company. On Monday, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that subpoena is likewise valid.


Illegal’s dragging of ICE agent shows the exact danger the officer who shot Renee Good feared, expert says
The Iran Strikes Have Flooded X with So Much AI Disinformation That I Went Crawling Back to Cable News
‘Blankies,’ ICE tactics and luxury jets: Top moments from Noem’s House testimony
Op-Ed: America’s Education Crisis, and How to Solve It
Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital
DOJ quietly closes autopen investigation targeting Biden and aides
Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire
GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge
Unearthed video shows Dem candidate supporting ‘reallocation’ of police funding to social service programs
Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns
Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected
BREAKING: Senate Rejects Dems’ War Powers Resolution Trying to Tie Trump’s Hands on Iran
DHS defends McLaughlin against allegations husband’s company profited millions from ad contracts: ‘Baseless’
Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who died by suicide: ‘Lapse in judgment’
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Feels the Heat During Fraud Hearing in DC: ‘You Should Go to Jail’
See also  Natural gas prices surge worldwide as Iran conflict crimps supply

In both cases, House Democrats argued that they wanted these records merely to inform their decision on whether to strengthen federal ethics and disclosure laws. Consovoy’s team argued that the Democrats’ argument is a pretext covering their true motivation of seeking to embarrass and politically damage the president.

Both Ramos and Mehta were appointed by Barack Obama. Ramos’s decision will now go to the Second Circuit appeals court, and the president’s lawyers will appeal the other decision to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.

These cases’ fate is uncertain in both appellate courts, which are currently left of center in terms of judicial philosophy. One or more of these cases could end up before the Supreme Court.

A third lawsuit, seeking to keep House Democrats from obtaining President Trump’s personal tax returns from almost a decade ago when he was a private citizen, is also expected – likely in the near future.

The case in the May 20 ruling is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House, No. 19-cv-1136 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.


Illegal’s dragging of ICE agent shows the exact danger the officer who shot Renee Good feared, expert says
The Iran Strikes Have Flooded X with So Much AI Disinformation That I Went Crawling Back to Cable News
‘Blankies,’ ICE tactics and luxury jets: Top moments from Noem’s House testimony
Op-Ed: America’s Education Crisis, and How to Solve It
Second suspect arrested after NYC snowball fight sends 2 police officers to hospital
DOJ quietly closes autopen investigation targeting Biden and aides
Top Trump ally Steve Daines exits Montana Senate race, plans to retire
GOP senators tangle with Noem during heated hearing on her handling of deportation surge
Unearthed video shows Dem candidate supporting ‘reallocation’ of police funding to social service programs
Popular Far-Left Streamer Advises Suicide Bombers to Switch to Drones for Terror Campaigns
Perfect Justice: We’re Raining Destruction on Iran Using a Suicide Drone They Designed But We Perfected
BREAKING: Senate Rejects Dems’ War Powers Resolution Trying to Tie Trump’s Hands on Iran
DHS defends McLaughlin against allegations husband’s company profited millions from ad contracts: ‘Baseless’
Rep. Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who died by suicide: ‘Lapse in judgment’
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Feels the Heat During Fraud Hearing in DC: ‘You Should Go to Jail’
See also  Newsom book tour missteps expose national campaign ‘growing pains’

The case in the May 22 ruling is Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19-cv-3826 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter