NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Newsom says Biden, Clinton, and Harris were too insulated; urges Democrats to get out of their bubble

9/11 Museum unveils exhibition for generation too young to remember the attacks: ‘Called everybody to lead’

America’s reddest state chases billion-dollar boom as others sour on massive emerging industry

Walz warned about African official operating Minnesota group homes from overseas

Teen boater found clinging to capsized vessel after 3 go missing; 2 bodies recovered

Ex-NFL cheerleader battles former gubernatorial aide in tight GOP primary race

Five takeaways from opening night of first-ever GOP midterm convention

Trump makes stunning first-of-its-kind cash promise in bid to rally GOP voters at Dallas midterm convention

Trump electrifies his base, but the nosebleeds are empty. Is it enough to win the midterms?

Fetterman teases where his true loyalty lies after surprise appearance at GOP convention

EXCLUSIVE: 25 years after 9/11, ICE says more than 2K known or suspected terrorists have been deported

Trump makes convention pitch for Paxton: You may not like his looks, but he’s the best AG in Texas history

US forces obliterate suspected ‘narco-terrorist’ vessel in lethal Eastern Pacific strike, killing 3

Military Base Guards Cleared to Say ‘Have a Blessed Day’ After Pete Hegseth Steps in to Oppose ‘Radical Anti-Christian’ Group

Dem senator delivers surprise video at Republican convention backing McCormick

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.