NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump says ‘hatred’ between Putin, Zelenskyy blocking Ukraine peace deal

Trump touts US has ‘tremendous’ amount of Venezuelan oil, vows to ‘take care’ of Cuba after Iran focus

Major Hospital Stops Providing Some Trans Surgeries to Adults

Florida Democrat Insults Charlie Kirk’s Memory in Disgusting Protest of Day of Remembrance

Newsom rips Noem as ‘Kosplay Barbie’ over $220M ad campaign, demands DHS release $500M for LA wildfires

In an Unexpected SCOTUS Moment, Justice Gorsuch Educated the Court on How Much Founding Fathers Drank – It Was Apparently a Lot

Teens inspired by ‘Scream’ recorded ‘first kill’ plot before stabbing classmate to death

White Cops in Philadelphia Sue City Over Alleged Racial Discrimination

Vocal anti-Trump Dem reveals which industry is trying to oust him from House seat: ‘I was a target’

Driver accused of attempting to mow down cop during street takeover strolls free hours later on $3K bond

Revealed: The Epic 3-Word Message That Popped Up on Potentially Millions of Israeli-Hacked Iranian Phones Just Before the Bombs Dropped

Minnesota Fraud Probe Could End with Criminal Referrals, Says House Oversight Chairman

Nancy Pelosi doubles down on defending Obama’s strikes on Libya while attacking Trump: ‘Read the law’

Noem reveals Trump will have ‘big agreement’ to announce at major summit with world leaders

Pelosi and Newsom may need to put an end to California’s ‘circular firing squad’ to avoid a midterm shock

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.