NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Democratic Congressman Under Ethics Committee Investigation for Alleged ‘Inappropriate Sexual Contact’

Blue state mayor arrested for fraud sparks uproar for not speaking English in viral clip: ‘How is this real’

Socialists accused of ‘motor mouth’ rhetoric as longtime Dem strategist unloads on far-left candidate

Sammy ‘The Bull’ Gravano recounts turning on John Gotti

Tragedy Deepens as Hayden Panettiere Dad’s Friends Reveal He Was Only Just Beginning to Recover from Losing Son

Cop Fired After Allegedly Using Flock Cameras to Stalk Former Boyfriend – She Abused System 166 Times

Andy Burnham insists ‘zero consequence’ from falling for Susie Wiles impersonator as ministers’ phone numbers appear online

Appeals court upholds limits on warrantless ICE arrests at churches

Trump Sends Election Day ‘Impostor’ Warning to Alaska Voters: ‘Don’t Let These Fraudsters Get Away with This Hoax’

Antisemitism fight explodes in Florida as voters head to the polls: ‘Political pogrom’

Lindsay Clancy’s family was ‘very concerned’ about her mental health in the months before she killed her kids

White House tears into Ossoff with brutal takedown after jab at key Trump aide: ‘Lightweight loser’

WNBA Forced to Issue Another Humiliating Response After Mom, Daughter Made to Cover Pro-Girl Shirts Opposing Trans Players in Women’s Sports

ICE Nabs Twice-Deported, Previously Convicted Drug Trafficker with 126 Kilos of Meth in Georgia

Iran fails to strike deal with US as deadline passes and Trump calls for ‘white flag of surrender’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.