NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Illegal alien ‘monster’ charged with raping dead girlfriend’s daughter, DHS blames Biden-era policies

Disturbing new details revealed in death of Denver airport intruder who died after breaching fence

Schumer backs GOP’s plan to bring the pain during future shutdowns: ‘I’m going to vote for it’

Mayorkas doesn’t endorse fellow Biden official Becerra in California gubernatorial race

Breaking: Marty Makary Is Out as FDA Commissioner – Acting Replacement Named

Indiana’s Cignetti Gifts Trump Custom Hoosiers Jersey as NCAA Champs Visit WH: ‘I Like This Guy’

Military vet sees opening for GOP in blue state amid ‘embarrassment’ of ‘stolen valor Walz’

Democrats Attempt to Bully House Republican Into Resigning Over ‘Racism’ Against Hakeem Jeffries

Career Criminal Opens Fire on Police Officers While Out on Parole for the Same Crime

Judge in Tiger Woods hearing allows access to drug records

Warsh confirmed as Fed governor, with vote on chairmanship to follow

Once doomed, Trump’s pick to carry out his economic vision clears first crucial hurdle

Court hears arguments on Missouri’s new map as Democrats try to claw back GOP redistricting gains

Virginia GOP leader blasts ‘power-hungry’ Jeffries as Dems mount ‘insane’ gambit to overpower high court

Mother’s Day dinner dispute turns violent as man accused of stabbing grandmother 11 times: police

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.