NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

GOP Rep to Force Vote on Expelling Ilhan Omar from Congress

DC pipe bomb suspect says someone needed to ‘speak up’ about stolen election claims

Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes Trump’s meetings with Zelenskyy, Netanyahu: ‘Can we just do America’

Tim Walz pushes back on Minnesota fraud allegations following viral daycare video

Ilhan Omar’s Somaliland stance slammed as Minnesota fraud scandal deepens

Trump, Zelenskyy say Ukraine peace deal close but ‘thorny issues’ remain after Florida talks

ICE delivers ‘greatest gift of all’ with Christmas arrests of convicted criminals across multiple states

Major cities see violent crime surge as national rates plummet significantly in 2025: survey

Deadly helicopter collision in New Jersey kills one, critically injures another

Is This Legal?: Leftist Group Recruits Military Officials to Turn Against Trump’s Drug Cartel Strikes

Charlie Kirk’s killing, Idaho murders plea and Karen Read verdict: Inside 2025’s biggest crime moments

FBI surges resources to Minnesota as Patel calls $250M fraud scheme ‘tip of iceberg’

‘Worst of the worst’: The 10 most violent illegal immigrants nabbed in 2025

Brits Weighed In on Whether Die Hard Is a Christmas Movie – Do You Agree with Them?

‘We are not afraid’: Erika Kirk vows TPUSA will continue campus debates nationwide

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.