NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Judge dismisses DOJ judicial misconduct complaint against James Boasberg

Schumer nukes GOP push for ‘Jim Crow-era’ voter ID laws in Trump-backed shutdown package

Celebrities Try to Lecture Americans with Flood of Anti-ICE Virtue Signalling at Grammys

Turning Point USA launches rival halftime show with star-studded lineup as NFL faces Super Bowl backlash

Melania documentary reception and box office reflects ‘disconnect’ of critics and audiences: Joe Concha

BREAKING: Police Have a ‘Crime Scene’ in Disappearance of ‘Today’ Show Host Savannah Guthrie’s Mom

Detransitioner Wins Multi-Million Dollar Medical Malpractice Case That Could Lead to the End of So-Called ‘Gender Affirming Care’

Illegal immigrant in Florida charged with arson, felony criminal mischief, sheriff says

Federal agents arrest 2 more in connection to Minnesota church storming

Biden-Appointed Federal Judge Smacks Down Minnesota’s Attempt to Block ICE Crackdown

Arizona man accused of human smuggling is a repeat offender who once ‘threw rocks’ at Army helicopter: docs

DOJ ramps up focus on violent agitators in Minnesota as resignations strain fraud cases

Groundhog Day: Punxsutawney Phil makes 140th weather prediction

Where things stand with the government shutdown and how soon it could end

House panel moves to consider criminal referrals for the Clintons

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.