NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Don’t Let the Media Paint the Trans Hockey Shooter as MAGA – His X Profile Shows His Politics Were Inanely Contradictory, Even Schizophrenic

Breaking: Armed Man Shot Breaking Into Mar-A-Lago Carrying Fuel Can, Shotgun

Armed man shot and killed after ‘unauthorized entry’ into Mar-a-Lago: Secret Service

Exiled Iranian princess: Islamic regime ‘has never been this close’ to falling, people ‘begging’ Trump to help

Former FBI agent offers new theory about Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance: ‘Personal grievance’

Trump sending US military hospital ship to Greenland to ‘take care’ of sick

Anti-Voter ID Mamdani Pleads with Citizens to Show 2 Forms of ID to Sign Up for Emergency Snow Shoveling

Kentucky Christian Charter Schools Denied Public Funding by State Supreme Court

Third-party spoiler threatens to upend New Hampshire Senate race unless Trump ends ‘war on Crypto’

What’s driving the increase in violent incidents involving transgender individuals? Expert weighs in

WATCH: Top 5 most memorable moments in American State of the Union history

‘Conflict of interest’: Byron Donalds takes financial interest in Bitcoin as he pushes pro-crypto platform

DHS suspends TSA PreCheck, Global Entry as partial government shutdown continues

Grenell calls ice rink vandal a ‘terrorist’ as federal authorities hunt suspect in toxic attack

California woman hospitalized with chemical burns after portable charger explodes while sleeping

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.