NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Agitators Sabotage Winter Olympics Opening, Throw Fireworks as Police Fight Back with Water Cannon, Tear Gas

Federal appeals court upholds Trump mass detention policy for illegal immigrants

Sheriff leading Guthrie investigation spotted at basketball game as family pleads again with alleged ransomers

Anti-ICE agitators arrested at federal building in Minneapolis after lewd objects hurled at law enforcement

Tulsi Gabbard denies wrongdoing over delayed whistleblower complaint referral to Congress members: ‘Baseless’

Nicki Minaj fans say they’re leaving Democrat Party as rapper’s politics spark backlash and praise

Newsom Investigates After Reports of Anti-Trump Social Media Censorship (Where Was He When Twitter Banned Trump?) Then the Embarrassing Truth Hit

Calm amid chaos: Noem defies calls to resign, touts border victory as shutdowns, storms, and riots swirl

This Senate Democrat wants voter ID for his campaign events — but not federal elections

Ellen DeGeneres Comes Crawling Back to US After Fleeing Post-Trump Victory, Buys $27 Million California Mansion

Virginia Democrat gives profanity-laced response to Cruz’s criticism of the state’s redistricting push

Trump Admin Discovers ‘Staggering’ Billions Stolen in Suspected California Small Business Fraud

Two teens arrested after 15-year-old shot near Washington DC’s Union Station

Bishop Ronald Hicks replaces Dolan as Archbishop of New York with installation at St Patrick’s

Trump Announces ‘Clues’ Found in Nancy Guthrie Disappearance: ‘We Could Have Some Answers’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.