NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump talks to retirees in first outing since WHCA dinner shooting

GRAPHIC: Fed-up Scott Jennings Snaps, Takes Down Arrogant CNN Guest Who Gets Too Close for Comfort During Heated Debate

Shock Video: Suspicious K9 Had Cole Allen Locked Down Before Handler Pulled Him Away – Literally 2 Seconds Later Allen Made His Move

FBI, Secret Service probe Wisconsin brewery owner over free beer offer after alleged Trump killing attempt

MN governor race to replace Walz sees major shakeup as GOP contender ends campaign: ‘Don’t see a path’

Amazon explores ‘The Apprentice’ reboot with Trump Jr set for promotion: report

Damning Text Messages: Biden DOJ Lawyers Created Witch Hunt Targeting Catholic Nuns and Laughed About Hunting Them Down

FCC Chairman Clarifies Action Against ABC in Wake of Kimmel Controversy

Missing Republican state Senate candidate found dead in truck days after disappearance

Top school district put on notice as watchdog group threatens legal action over gender policy

Watch: Jasmine Crockett Claims She’s One of the Most ‘Powerful’ People in the Country, Slams Those Not ‘On the Same Level’

Time is running out for Virginia Supreme Court to decide on redistricting referendum

No Good Deeds Go Unpunished By Our European ‘Allies’ and Their Total Inaction

600 groups with $2B in revenue mobilize 3,000 May Day protests in a ‘red-blue’ alliance, probe finds

Trump and GOP lawmakers push for executive mansion expansion

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.