NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Secret Service offers glimpse into WHCA Dinner security after alleged Trump assassination attempt

French Modeling Scout with Ties to Epstein Found Dead Near Paris

Boasberg delivers fresh immigration setback to Trump in free-speech clash

‘So Devastated’: Hollywood Stars Mourn Death of 18-Year-Old Actress

Academics and CEOs dominate Fed advisory boards

28 for ’28: The open presidential race field could reach more than two dozen candidates

Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is clumsy, anachronistic, and badly acted

China’s routing of Biden in chip war with US created a communist tech giant

Witnesses recount ‘scary’ NYC stabbing after suspect allegedly yelled ‘Allahu Akbar’ during attacks

Multiple injured after floatplane makes emergency landing, catches fire off Washington coast

California mayor’s hot mic catches candid exchange after audience sends meeting off rails

Never Forget Dems Supported Large-Scale Deportations Until Trump Took Up the Issue – Just Listen to What Obama Said in 2014

Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman admits to sufficient facts in June drunken driving case

Rubio unveils visa restrictions targeting cybercrime networks

House Democrats Furious at Their Own Campaign Arm Over Expensive Primary Blunder

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.