NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Former Florida law enforcement officer accused of forcing 6-year-old underwater in hotel pool: report

California family revives beloved Christmas tradition with surprise sleepover visit

$220 Million Green Bay Packers Star Sparks Controversy After Christmas Gifting Revelation

Trump to Meet Zelenskyy at Mar-a-Lago ‘to Work Out Issues as Much as Possible’

Tiny Pacific nation to take up to 75 deportees as Trump administration accelerates mass removals

Misspelled learning center, no children inside: Emmer presses Walz over Minnesota daycare tied to $4M

Trump suggests he’ll call final shots on peace deal ahead of Zelenskyy meeting: ‘We’ll see what he’s got’

Kash Patel announces permanent closure of J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building for Reagan building move

Interior Department plans AI Theodore Roosevelt exhibit for America250

New motion seeks former Colorado Clerk Tina Peters’ release, challenging state after Trump’s pardon

Indicted Democrat edits $109,000 ring allegedly bought with stolen FEMA funds from photo

Times Square ball goes red, white and blue for America’s 250th birthday

Trump weapons package to Taiwan sparks flurry of Chinese sanctions

Definition of Insanity: Repeat Offender Reportedly Tied to 3 Separate Shootings Was Freed After SWAT Standoff

Op-Ed: I’ll Believe it When I See it – How Liberal Santa Scams the Nation

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.