NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Court Set to Deliver Big Win to 70 Churches Seeking to Leave United Methodist Denomination

How a foreign government helped accused Saudi spy’s family flee US after OpenAI bug scandal

Violent far-left riots in France are ‘chilling warning’ for Americans at home, Mike Johnson says

WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Nears 50 Percent as Massie Loses More Ground

Trump aides fire back at press over Zacharia firing as they seek to limit damage

Convicted serial rapist originally sentenced to 124 years walks free after 20, sparking outrage

Blue State Schools Forced Christians to Keep Bibles in Envelopes So Other Students Wouldn’t Be ‘Exposed to Them’

Elon Musk Announces Plan to Distribute a Financial Gift to ‘Every Kid in America’

Trump heads to unlikely battleground as GOP fights to hold Senate and more top headlines

State Trooper Dishonorably Discharged for Using ‘Offensive Language’

It took 3 months to get inside this massive Texas data center — here’s what we saw

What’s next for Skydance after the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger?

National Guard member shot in DC, police chief says

Epstein-linked billionaire pours $500K into super PAC backing Kentucky Democrat: ‘Dirty Epstein-class money’

Booker rival who ‘shoots from the hip’ hopes viral debate moment can break GOP’s Senate drought

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.