NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Ex-Indiana deputy charged with felony for allegedly using Flock cameras to stalk girlfriend

House Democrats Panicking as Republicans Prepare to Make Them Go on the Record with Socialism Vote

Six Fascinating, Barely-Known Facts Proving America and Jews/Judaism Have Been Linked Since the Founding

Swimmer rushed to hospital after suspected shark attack at Martha’s Vineyard

Nicki Minaj to star in ‘Shark Tank’- style show for Trump administration

Illegal immigrant’s ‘over-the-top’ sexual assault on elderly woman sends sheriff into rage: ‘Out of control’

Another ActBlue leader pleads Fifth as House investigates alleged foreign donations

Video: Trump Can’t Hold Back After Reporter Asks If He Plans to Nuke a Militarily Defeated Iran: ‘Stupid’

Woke stunt goes horribly wrong as Michigan Dems open convention with brutal ‘land acknowledgment’

Watch: JD Vance Echoes Will Smith in Fiery Response to Abdul El-Sayed’s Comments About Wife

White House brings receipts after media claims noncriminal ICE arrests ‘soaring’: ‘False narratives’

Hasan Piker’s Claim He Doesn’t Hate America Clashes With That Time He Declared ‘I Hate America’

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Resigns After Internal Disagreements

Ex-House Freedom Caucus chair says GOP isn’t ‘a conservative party anymore,’ but Democrats are ‘worse’

FLASHBACK: Mamdani torched for recycling 9/11 tributes after years of near-identical posts

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.