NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

MN Dem Sen candidate in hot seat over upcoming event hosted by man enveloped in fraud scandal: ‘Red flags’

Thune’s midterm crossroads: Keep the Senate working or let candidates campaign

Republicans face brutal midterm headwinds. Six forces could help them defy history.

Parents accuse Oregon hospital of making them drive dead baby home to Seattle: lawsuit

Tennessee cops raided man’s home after he criticized officer for speeding: lawsuit

Pure Evil: Missouri Mother Pleads Out After Baking Tiny Baby to Death in Oven – Her Sentence Proves Society Has Lost Its Way

Illegal alien allegedly grabs school police officer’s gun, shoots him in femoral artery: DOJ

Previously Deported Illegal Alien Charged with Horrific Crimes Against Louisiana Child

One of the Left’s Favorite Podcasters Calls Christian Conservatives a ‘Cancer’ to America

Michigan student confronts El-Sayed over Iran stance in tense exchange: ‘Do you stand with us?’

NYC kitten rescue defends ‘NO F—ING MAGA’ adoption policy as PETA calls for it to be abolished

Soft-on-Crime DA Called ‘Bloody Mary’ Caught Trying to Toss Child-Killer’s Life Sentence Because It’s Just Not Fair

Tylenol murders mystery deepens after sheriff’s office solves decades-old ‘Unknown Wanderer’ cold case

Woke Liberal Busted Pretending to Be Palestinian Apologizes: ‘I Am a White Woman of Significant Privilege’

Local Virginia GOP chair says Arlington County officials prioritize illegal immigrants over public safety

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.