NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Armed Florida Owner Shows What ‘Stand Your Ground’ Means as Intruder Attempts to Break Inside

Scientists Discover New Tick-Borne Virus After Spread of Mystery Illness

Squatter nightmare turns DC apartment building into ‘drug haven’ as legal battle drags on: ‘There’s no help’

Maryland’s only House Republican looks to Larry Hogan to help survive redistricting

Missouri AG files petition asking Supreme Court to revive Trump-backed redistricting map

Portion of the Kennedy Center ceiling collapses, renewing calls to close for renovations

Nevada Democratic election chief says Trump administration hit his office with seven DOJ subpoenas

DOJ ordered to freeze antitrust work with Canada as trade tensions intensify

Left-Wing Outlet Says It’s a ‘Racist Conspiracy Theory’ to Talk About Immigrants Replacing American Voters

WATCH: Illegal alien busted in battleground state after allegedly committing voter fraud

American Journalist Sentenced to Prison After Pleading Guilty to Working as an Agent of the Chinese Government

Republicans denounce Lindsay Clancy mistrial: ‘Victims deserved far, far better’

Two Suspects Arrested After Famous Musician and His Family Are Murdered in Mexico

Mullin asks DOJ to review voter data sharing tied to Zuckerberg-funded nonprofit group

Trump lawyers target what Letitia James won’t say about evidence in $450M case

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.