NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump snubs Canada by withdrawing country’s invite to join ‘most prestigious Board of Leaders ever’

Newly minted Virginia AG who fantasized about opponent’s family dying roasted over glaring typo

Video captures Detroit student allegedly wielding box cutter in classroom chase as teacher intervenes

Inside ‘MELANIA’: The unprecedented access behind Melania Trump’s first film

Armed carjacker’s wild Corvette rampage turns downtown into war zone; sergeant wounded in deadly shootout

Trump calls for investigation into Ilhan Omar’s wealth, says it should start ‘NOW’

‘Abhorrent’: 76 Republicans Vote to Keep Carveouts for Child Sex Change Groups in Spending Package

Key takeaways from Jack Smith’s House Judiciary testimony

FBI Arrests Leftist Who Dared Pam Bondi to ‘Come and Get Me’ After Storming Minnesota Church

Republicans narrowly reject efforts to handcuff Trump’s war powers in Venezuela

Klobuchar files for Minnesota governor run after Walz abandons reelection bid

Patel reveals bizarre ‘self-awarded’ trophy former FBI officials made to celebrate Trump probe

NYT: Murder Rate Hits 125-Year Low in Trump’s First Year Back in Office — Biggest Single-Year Drop Ever

Jack Smith dodges questions on Cassidy Hutchinson witness credibility

Paris Hilton teams up with AOC to push House to pass stalled AI deepfake porn bill

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.