NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Woman found dead with unexplained trauma in Central Park as NYPD searches for answers

John Fetterman accidentally calls himself a ‘lifelong Republican’ at Texas Tribune Festival

University Scrubbed Pentagon-Funded Professor’s Ties to CCP: Report

SCOTUS Climate Suit Could Devastate Family Farms, Give China and Russia an Edge: Expert

Ozempic Maker Teams Up with Big AI for New Drug Development

Breaking: ‘They Were Looking to Do Big Damage’ – Trump Speaks Out on Terror Plot as Photo of Suspects Goes Viral

Texas voters have plenty to say about whether Lone Star State could turn blue

Texas clinic owner convicted in $26M military health fraud tied to gold-plated Cybertruck

Irish PM rejects antisemitism concerns in Ireland amid dramatic vote over boycotting Israel game

Tim Tebow Announces He’s ‘Pausing’ Relationship with Christian Group Targeted by Liberal Reporter

Trump Terminates ‘Ridiculous’ Biden-Buttigieg EV Mandate with Sweeping New Fuel Standards

Trump’s Greenland obsession isn’t random. Here’s what’s at stake

Trump reaffirms ICE arrest policy after confusing guidance sparks alarm among agents

Disturbing Video: ‘One of the Most Horrific Things I’ve Seen’ – Journalists Disgusted as Illegal Nearly Drowns Toddler in Effort to Cross Border

Florida sex offender accused of babysitting-ad trap as police investigate potential interstate predator

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.