NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Military Identifies 2 Soldiers Killed in Texas Helicopter Crash Earlier This Week

Shooting Rocks University Campus as School Prepares for Classes to Resume

Nearly One-in-Six Americans Have Acted on AI Medical Advice Without Speaking to Human, Poll Shows

Florida cold case suspect allegedly confesses to 1987 murder and reveals secret crime-scene details

Virginia State University shooting: At least 5 injured, one critically

ICYMI: Judge Shuts Down Democrats’ Attempt to Rush in Late Votes After Candidates Drop Out

Top Dem operative brushes off latest scandal plaguing Maine Senate candidate as ‘salacious gossip’

DSA brand on trial as El-Sayed struggles where Dems can least afford it

Gun rights gets ‘greatest restoration’ in 100 years with latest Trump DOJ move, lawmaker hails

Socialist in Trump country gives Karl Marx vision thumbs-up before ducking key tax question

Democrats realize they love Haley Stevens, just a little too late

Veteran pediatrician hails Medicaid shift ending youth sex-change treatments: ‘This is not denial of care’

Legal expert calls for Smithsonian leadership overhaul over ‘self-loathing’ portrayal of history: ‘It’s bile’

Man charged with assault, hate crimes after allegedly disrupting Shabbat services at NYC synagogue

Shake Shack worker allegedly calls out before robbing own restaurant, returns in uniform 2 days later

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.