NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

New Netflix Kids Movie Slammed as ‘One of the Most Satanic Inversions’

GOP lawmakers smell something else behind Big Tech’s AI doomsday warnings: ‘Something else going on’

‘As a Lifelong Democrat, I Am Ashamed’: Mom Blasts Her Party After Illegal Kills Her Son and His New Bride

Young swing-state voters cozy up to Democratic Socialists, say party establishment must ‘learn’ from DSA wins

European Leaders in Panic Mode Over Pete Hegseth’s Military Plans for the Region: Report

DEI Dies at Starbucks, but Not Before They Have to Pay Big Fine for Discrimination by Race, Sex in Florida

Ex-Dem insider reveals why Biden’s daughter threatened to sue her: ‘Bordered on parody’

Flock CEO, tech rivals called to testify before senators over AI camera privacy concerns

Federal judges reveal private coordination behind Trump immigration cases and more top headlines

Watch: Jelly Roll 2.0 – Blue Collar Comedy Legend Ron White Attacks TX Republicans – This After Trashing Trump Online

Watch: Teary Dem in Squad Car Asks God to Deliver Her from DUI Arrest – Apparently Doesn’t Know Her Party Officially Booted God in 2012

Congress is vulnerable to a paralyzing terrorist attack

Judge Judy warns of ‘danger’ if prosecutors don’t retry Lindsay Clancy after murder trial ends in mistrial

‘Unprecedented’: Judges reveal behind-the-scenes coordination on Trump immigration cases

Apple TV’s thriller ‘Last Seen’ is worth seeing

See also Barry Melrose, 1956-2026

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.