NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Tyler Robinson judge unseals ATF report in assassination of Charlie Kirk

Senate Candidate James Talarico Reports Eye-Popping Fundraising Haul – But We’ve Seen This From Democrats Before

Frat house turns into crime scene after member allegedly sexually assaults woman, police say

Breaking: Former Lt. Governor of Virginia and His Wife Found Dead

Didn’t file your taxes on time? Here’s what a tax expert says you should do next

Republicans bet higher tax refunds will boost midterm chances as blue states resist relief

S&P 500 Smashed Another Record Wednesday, Signaling the Markets Believe Trump That the Iran Conflict Is Ending

Democrats vow to block next Trump Supreme Court pick amid Alito speculation

Democratic Rep. Calls to ‘Eliminate the President of the United States from the Office Right Now’

Homeland Security official’s killing leaves agency ‘devastated’ as vetting breakdown exposed

Swalwell’s mounting sexual misconduct allegations threaten career beyond politics, experts warn

Trump Admin Moves to Wipe Out the Last Remaining Convictions from January 6, Specifically Regarding Proud Boys and Oath Keepers

Virginia redistricting referendum tightens into a dead heat as early voting surges

2 detained after shooting in New York leaves 15-year-old killed, two others wounded: police

Guards at ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ beat, pepper-sprayed detainees, lawyer says

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.