NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Susie Wiles’ lawyer denies approving FBI recording, says he’d lose license over ‘stunt’

Watch: Doorbell Camera Catches Toddler Barely Escaping Aggressive Coyote in the Middle of Los Angeles County

Agency that nabbed ‘El Chapo,’ ‘Diddy’ threatened as Democrats’ DHS shutdown drags on

Watch: Black Panelist Mops Floor with White Lib Who Seems to Think Black Americans Don’t Know How to Get ID

Registered sex offender’s city council bid sparks fury as officials explore blocking his path

Where Iran’s ballistic missiles can reach — and how close they are to the US

Swalwell campaign sets off alarm bells after accepting $25K donation from CCP-tied lawyer: ‘Outrageous’

California’s vulnerable House Republicans swap districts and strategize ahead of primary

Bill Clinton faces high-stakes House grilling in Epstein probe and more top headlines

Senate GOP sends warning to House SAVE Act agitators: Don’t tell us what to do

Donald Trump and Mark Carney: ‘Clash-mates’?

Republicans have a rare shot at winning the California governorship

DOJ sues 5 more states, demanding access to voter rolls: ‘We will not be deterred’

MLB Star Blasts Newsom for Implying Black People Are ‘Stupid’ and Can’t Read: ‘I Was a Straight A Student’

Corporate America is on the move, and these red states are cashing in

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.