NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Nashville Airport Authority Votes Unanimously to Change Name to Honor Dolly Parton

Watch: Convention Crowd Symbolically Anoints JD Vance for 2028 with Chant

Inside Trump’s intimate meeting with nation’s bravest soldiers during whirlwind Texas trip

California woman chased, fatally shot by illegal immigrant DoorDash driver who stalked her for months: DHS

AOC, Mamdani interaction caught on cam at 9/11 memorial sparks online fury

Breaking: Newly Declassified 9/11 Documents Reveal the Repeated Warnings Received by Clinton and Bush

The ‘Jumper’ Victims of 9/11 Deserve to Have Their Stories Heard: And Yet They’ve Been Erased by the Media

Attacks of 9/11 sent Rep. Eli Crane into the military and shaped the way he views the Iran war

Texas man remembered by Fox News hosts after repeat offender arrested in savage park bench slaying

Reporter’s Notebook: Countdown is on as Senate races to pass crypto, college sports bills

Court documents show groups inspiring ‘satanist’ teenager’s alleged plans to attack Christians

AOC’s ‘modern-day lynchings’ claim torn to shreds online as Black hanging case findings tell a different story

Mamdani greets America’s Mayor Rudy Giuliani despite calls to skip 9/11 memorial

Flashback: How James Woods Encountered, Then Reported Multiple 9/11 Hijackers to the FBI

Trump Rejects Saudi Crown Prince’s Pleas for New U.S. Strikes in Middle East: Report

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.