NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump nominates Chris Klomp for HHS deputy secretary, calls him ‘a potential STAR’

Muslim Mamdani-backed socialist primary winner suggested America deserved 9/11 in unearthed video

Democrats ditch the ‘Valleycrat’ playbook in bid to topple California GOP congressman

Illegal immigrant gets eight year prison sentence for $89 million payroll tax fraud scheme

The business of suing the federal government

Slotkin says Democratic Party needs ‘new leadership’: ‘Old models are no longer working’

Trump administration pledges $150M in aid, deploys Navy warships after deadly Venezuela earthquakes

Florida executes 74-year-old for wife’s murder, becoming oldest inmate put to death in state’s modern history

A Warning Charlie Kirk Gave Back in 2020 Coming True Now Within Democratic Party

French citizen who illegally cast ballot in 2022 midterms says New Jersey automatically registered him to vote

Jury deadlocks in federal trial of man accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire in Los Angeles

Dems put on blast over poll that shows record-low patriotism in US: ‘Tear our society apart’

Blue state leaders erupt after Supreme Court’s decision ending TPS protections for Haitians, Syrians

Real Man: Churchgoer Can’t Find Tool to Free Kids from Sweltering Car, Says ‘My Fist Will Probably Work,’ Then, With God’s Help, Starts Smashing Glass

Red state gov bans July Fourth fireworks statewide over wildfire concerns ahead of America’s 250th anniversary

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.