NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

WATCH: Hearing turmoil as Jasmine Crockett unloads on MLK’s niece in wild racially-charged rant

Nancy Mace Announces Next Career Move After Losing South Carolina Gov. Primary

Karmelo Anthony isolated in jail as track meet killer appeals conviction, preps for prison stint

Video: Infuriated by Immigrant’s Attempted Beheading, Irish Citizens Set Fires Across Belfast

Obama-appointed judge with ties to anti-Trump conspiracy theory hit with misconduct complaint

Pregnant mother found murdered in Mexico as frantic search for missing children ends with surprise discovery

First on Fox: Trump admin opens new front in fraud crackdown targeting health insurers, drug middlemen

God Help Us: Donations Continued to Roll in for Karmelo Anthony After He Was Convicted of Murder

GRAPHIC LANGUAGE: ‘This Is a War,’ ‘Both … Brothers Should Be Dead!’ – Chilling Videos from Karmelo Anthony Supporters Outside Courthouse

Trump concession breathes new life into stalled FISA spy powers deal

Jimmy Kimmel trolls Spencer Pratt with U-Haul after primary loss, and Pratt responds

UK’s terrorism watchdog admits Trump administration may be right about migration being a national security issue

Former Louisiana mayor gets jail time for sex with son’s teen friend at house party

Cardi B’s reaction to Karmelo Anthony verdict draws millions of views and fierce criticism

Black Actor Shoots Down Having a ‘Woke’ James Bond: ‘That’s Not What They Like’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.