NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Hasan Piker names pro-CCP tycoon Singham as financier of ‘political movements’ despite nonprofit veneer

Massie positions himself for potential political future after primary defeat: ‘I won’t be going away silently’

Trump-backed candidates score major boost from deep-pocketed AI Super PAC in upcoming primaries

How AIPAC’s spending strategy evolved, to the dread of anti-Israel Democrats and Republican detractors

Tulsi Gabbard honors wish of Gold Star wife to visit husband’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery

Trump flexes MAGA muscle in Texas Senate runoff clash between Cornyn and Paxton

Skydiver dies after midair collision with another jumper during group jump in Washington state

Dog accidentally fires shotgun, striking woman yards away during chaotic gas station stop

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner embraces democratic socialism at Bernie Sanders rally in Portland

Jacob Frey criticized for remembering George Floyd on Memorial Day, six years after death sparked riots

Widow of ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle Hits Back Against Dem Senate Candidate for ‘Making Things Up’

Watch: Trump Sums Up Memorial Day Better and Quicker Than Any President in Living Memory – Just 9 Words

President Trump Explains Importance of Memorial Day in Rousing Speech: ‘The Ultimate Sacrifice’

Dem City Gave Muslim Group $35k and Didn’t Track How It Was Spent

Anti-ICE protesters clash with agents outside New Jersey detention center as Gov Sherrill denied entry

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.