NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Illegal immigrant accused of killing newlywed couple in Oregon crash arrested by ICE after jail release

Pentagon urges Congress to codify ‘Department of War’ name change it estimates will cost $52 million

Biden Admin Used a ‘Code Word’ to Conceal Loans to Planned Parenthood, Senator Alleges

Reagan shooter calls link to Washington hotel ‘spooky’ after alleged Trump assassination attempt at same site

Self-Avowed ‘Socialist Socialite’ Roasted After Mocking Budget Dress Worn by Hegseth’s Wife

Teacher’s ‘Disgusting’ Comment About White House Correspondents’ Dinner Shooting Gets Him Placed on Leave

CNN Admits Trump Suspect Parroted Mainstream Dem ‘Hitler’ Rhetoric, Was Radicalized Around Election

DHS taunts media for reporting about ‘Green Bay man’ illegal immigrant charged in vicious machete attack

Ghost in the gallery: George Washington looks on as King Charles addresses Congress

Dem and GOP lawmakers trade blame over rhetoric after WHCD shooting: ‘It is disgusting’

Dem plot to limit Trump war powers on Cuba fails as GOP falls in line with military action abroad

Five key themes of King Charles III’s address to Congress

Starmer escapes inquiry on Mandelson vetting by a Parliament vote

FBI brings alleged China-linked hacker to US in rare extradition as Patel defends Italy trip

Dem lawmaker hosts Hamas-linked org, draws swift backlash online

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.