NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Pentagon plans to give South Korea primary role in deterring North Korea threats under new strategy

Minnesota ‘on the clock’ as HHS threatens penalties over childcare fraud scandal

Man who allegedly threatened to shoot ICE agents had rifles, body armor and ammo cache, feds say

RNC regroups and recalibrates for midterm election fight

Anonymous letter to California GOP chapter calls for war on ICE, urges agents be sent ‘home in a body bag’

Thousands march through Minneapolis, swarm Target Center demanding ICE removal from Minnesota

Christians Beaten, Abducted in Nigeria as Church Service Attacked, Prayer Books Desecrated, and Worship Instruments Broken

GOP Rep. Releases Footage to Preemptively Crush Democrats’ ICE Detention Facility Stunt

Mamdani clarifies NYC won’t check immigration status for universal childcare enrollees

House Passes Law Forcing Universities to Give Pregnant Students Information on Keeping Their Children Instead of Aborting Them

Watch: JD Vance Tells the Uncomfortable Truth About Abortion at March for Life

California sues Trump administration over allegedly ‘unlawful’ pipeline restart approval years after oil spill

Trump’s pardon of House Dem Cuellar back in the spotlight as his brother faces indictment

Mike Johnson Tells March for Life Attendees His Teen Parents Were Told to Abort Him, Is ‘Eternally Grateful’ They Refused

Judge’s rejection of Don Lemon charges faces conflict of interest concerns

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.