NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Red States Unite Against California Over It’s Alleged Plot To Impose Green Agenda On Nation

New York Might Make Mamdani’s City-Owned Grocery Stores Permanent

NY AG hopeful blasts Letitia James as Medicaid fraud recoveries collapse: ‘She’s not doing the job’

Trump nominates Oklahoma law enforcement veteran Lance Schroyer to lead ICE as permanent director

Two 14-year-olds flee MTA officers, remain missing after vanishing from New Jersey train station

Judge rules Dan Sullivan can appear on Alaska primary ballot against Sen. Dan Sullivan

Jeffries welcomes Democratic Socialists into the fold as critics warn party is revealing ‘exactly who it is’

Polygamous sect leader convicted of abuse charges after girls found in trailer on Arizona highway

Hezbollah rejects Israel and Lebanon’s peace framework: ‘Null and void’

Trump unloads on ‘lunatic’ John Bolton after ex-aide pleads guilty in classified docs case

Man who set Virginia council member on fire over alleged affair gets 40-year sentence

Carville calls for formal ‘schism’ with socialist candidates: ‘Can’t be in the same party’

Bill Maher presses Vance over Trump’s election fraud claims: ‘That s*** has to stop’

Former House intel leader points to Dem rhetoric ‘encouraging’ violence as 8th man charged in UFC terror plot

Hollywood Libs Pour Love on Beijing, Tout China as ‘First Petro-Zero Economy,’ But Facts Show Different Story

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.