NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

CNN, After Bleeding Millions of Viewers, Rolls Out Documentary Targeting Patriotic Christians

Trump orders complete withdrawal of all troops from Syria within two months: report

Watch: Trump Posts Loving Tribute to Rush Limbaugh on Fifth Anniversary of His Death, Says ‘There Will Never Be Another Rush Limbaugh’

Missile defense race shifts to space as experts say real battle is in first minutes after launch

Border protocols automatically triggered in search for Nancy Guthrie, retired agent says

FBI joins probe in murder of Christian teacher shot in Ohio home as ‘American Idol’ husband, children slept

Report: Legacy Media ‘Journalist’ Caught Giving Marco Rubio the Finger During Press Conference

Obama and Susan Rice Reportedly ‘Broke Down and Cried’ After Trump’s 2016 Win

Mamdani plan pours millions into ‘racial equity’ offices and six-figure diversity jobs, cuts 5,000 NYPD jobs

Netflix faces consumer lawsuit as Warner Bros. merger scrutiny mounts

Bernie Sanders heads to California to rally support for the billionaire wealth tax

Duffy gives Illinois 30-day ultimatum after audit finds 1 in 5 noncitizen truck licenses issued illegally

Nigel Farage appoints JD Vance’s ‘British sherpa’ as head of policy for Reform UK

How to watch President Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address to Congress live

Climate groups sue Trump administration over EPA’s bombshell deregulation decision

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.