NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

US Kill Total on Drug Boats Hits 133 as Strike Takes Out 3 More ‘Narco-Terrorists’ in Caribbean

Trump announces $5 billion pledge in Gaza aid from Board of Peace members

Mobs in India Destroy Christian Homes After Believers Refuse to Renounce Jesus

Rubio defends US operation in Venezuela, calls out reporter for trying to start a fight

Columbia pulls promotion for DHS career expo after faculty claims university is aiding ‘authoritarianism’

UN Head Sends Congratulations to Iran on Anniversary of 1979 Revolution – Weeks After Muslim State Slaughtered Thousands of Its Own Citizens

NY Man Sentenced After Offering Cash and Bottle of Wild Turkey Bourbon for the Murder and Gruesome Disposal of Romantic Rival’s Body

Democrats say Trump redistricting push backfiring as Virginia advances new House maps

Hundreds of women pledge loyalty to ‘Deadpool Killer’ despite brutal double murder confession

Chicago-area teacher breaks silence after losing job over 2-word Facebook post supporting ICE: ‘Devastating’

Reuters Goes Out of Its Way to Brand Male Trans Mass Shooter a Woman

Watch: The Moment Paul Rudd Schools Young Co-Stars on Jesus, the Fact That He’s Real, and How Rudd Wants to Meet Him

AG Pam Bondi announces ‘all’ Epstein files have been released, listing over 300 high-profile names

Hillary Clinton says migration ‘went too far’ and ‘needs to be fixed in a humane way’

Thousands rally in Munich against Iran regime before second round of nuclear talks

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.