NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Manhattan DA’s office employee charged with sexual abuse after alleged incident on Queens subway

Florida prisoner laughs as judge sentences him to life for killing cellmate with pen: ‘You are amusing’

Florida man’s execution date set for killing 2, including small child

Senate GOP launches all-night vote-a-rama to fund ICE, Border Patrol through end of Trump’s term

Ilhan Omar Rages at Reporter Who Confronted Her About Financial Disclosure: ‘You’re Stupid’

Five things to know about Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner

Judge Slams the Brakes on Democrats’ Virginia Redistricting, Rules Every Vote ‘Ineffective’

Mexican national convicted of illegally voting in US after false citizenship claims faces removal: DHS

DC pipe bomb suspect pleads not guilty to terrorism and WMD charges

Virginia court declares state’s redistricting vote was unconstitutional in legal win for Republicans

National Gallery of Art receives record $116 million donation for America’s 250th birthday

Appeals Court Sides With Texas on 10 Commandments in Classroom, Overruling Lower Court

Chuck Schumer’s Attempt to Defend the SPLC from Stunning Indictment Earns Him Mockery

Virginia House GOP hangs election survival hopes on courts after gerrymander

Federal court blocks Newsom’s bid to shackle ICE in Trump immigration win

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.