NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Mississippi law could create statewide registry of undocumented immigrants

Marine missing from USS Anchorage now focus of recovery mission off California coast

Lawsuit filed after tree dubbed ‘Widow Maker’ fatally crushes man at Texas BBQ restaurant

Jacob Frey praises Somali community as Minnesota faces renewed scrutiny over fraud investigations

Trump calls likely DC mayor Janeese Lewis George a ‘communist’ and vows to block her agenda

Trump: Renovations to DC’s East Potomac Golf Links begin in September

Top Democrat lawmaker suffers minor injuries in Delaware car crash

Pollster Stands By Rejected Survey Showing Struggling Democrat in Single Digits That He Released Anyway

Doctor Pushing Puberty Blockers on Teen Boy Was Charged With Possessing Child Porn

Sisters, friend charged in Texas mom’s stabbing death

The Swamp’s Got Another Bright Idea, and It Could End Up Hosing Every American Who Drives

SCOTUS Showdown Over Gun Suppressors Looms After Appeals Court Creates ‘Circuit Split’

Punk Allegedly Pulls Pistol on Workmen, Ends up Tied to Front Porch to Make Police Pickup Quick and Easy

Soft-On-Crime Socialist Set To Run Nation’s Capital Ravaged By Teen Takeovers

What to know about the July Fourth celebrations in DC

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.