NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms

Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit

Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law

WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’

USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule

Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories

FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police

Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep

Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’

Obama Presidential Library Betrays Black Visitors, Issues Wildly Racist Demand on Website – at Least We’ve Been Told It’s Racist

Hundreds dead as Europe breaks temperature records during heat wave

Senate Republican pushes overhaul to cut red tape and speed up American energy projects

Mamdani and Hochul announce cash infusion for New York City Abortion Access Hub expansion

Michigan childcare provider collected $1.1M in taxpayer funds despite no visible signs of operating

Freedom 250’s Great American State Fair kicks off 16-day festival on National Mall: ‘America come to life’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.