NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump-backed Darline Graham Nordone faces test in unpredictable South Carolina primary

Pentagon races to buy 10X more missiles as Iran war dwindles arsenal, threatens readiness for China aggression

GOP senators rally behind 9/11 families in push to ban Mamdani from anniversary ceremony: ‘He’s a disgrace’

One year later, some DC residents praise Trump’s National Guard deployment

Deported child predator who illegally reentered US sentenced to 20 years in federal prison

Florida woman accused of faking cancer to scam hundreds out of $40K, police say

Trump used catering truck, Air Force One decoy to evade Iran threat: report

Family Recounts Chilling Meetings with Doctors, Nurses Before Beloved Grandmother Was Euthanized, Allegedly Against Her Will and Theirs

Dem Gov Maura Healey signs sweeping Massachusetts bill allowing abortions up to birth

Mamdani’s luxury-home tax rollout derailed for now as judge delivers win to NYC homeowners over massive list

Geraldo Proves Trump Right, Calls Haiti ‘Hell’ While Whining About Haitians Being Deported Home

Video: Caitlin Clark’s Suspension Reversed After Ref’s Bizarre Technical Overturned – This as Allegations of Open Racism Flare in WNBA

Fauci Admitted 2nd Dose of COVID Vaccine ‘Theoretically Could Be Associated with Miscarriage’ in Newly Released Texts

Rand Paul Finally Gets Inside Fort Knox Vault and Reveals His Findings

Unlicensed NYC boat operator allegedly ignored safety warnings before mother, baby died in capsizing: feds

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.