NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Music and patriotism: Dukes of Hazzard star praises community and family at Great American State Fair

Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing: Judge orders redactions to ex-lover’s video testimony

Social media influencer and model, 22, killed in violent highway crash

Trump threatens troop withdrawals if ‘very good deal’ on Greenland isn’t struck

Stepdad accused of sex assault as cops widen probe into girl’s lethal Benadryl ingredient dose

More than 30 injured after Maryland transit bus crashes into building near Baltimore

House Dem back in the spotlight as brother faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted

Platner drops out of crucial Senate race after bombshell rape allegation torpedoes campaign

Franklin Graham Gives McDonald’s ‘Free Advice’ on How to ‘Bring Happy Customers Back’

Who is Valli Geiger? Meet the Maine Dem that Platner urged to run for Senate

Mike Rowe Sues Discovery for $2 Million in ‘Deadliest Catch’ Dispute

Erika’s Heartbreaking Reaction to a Woman She Saw in the Courtroom Crying Over Charlie’s Murder

Former Wisconsin Judge Who Was Convicted of Helping an Illegal Alien Evade ICE Gets Light Sentence

Bernie-backed socialist who allied with Platner could supplant him on ballot

WATCH: Dana White drops 2028 hints while raving about his favorite Trump cabinet secretary

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.