NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Op-Ed: The Weight of a Word

WATCH: Inside look at the dangerous cartel human smuggling tunnels still being used at border

Paul Pelosi charged with misdemeanor hit-and-run in Napa Valley

House Republicans Call for Investigation Into Mamdani Administration’s Possible Violation of Federal Law

US backs Iraq-Syria oil pipeline bypassing Strait of Hormuz

Over 100 Democrats voted to end aid to Israel. They’ve received nearly $11 million from AIPAC

WATCH: Felony suspect’s ocean getaway unravels after 90-minute standoff with lifeguards

Covert DNA sample from Colorado man’s trash revives 44-year-old Texas murder case: report

Don Lemon Claims People Are Begging Him to Run for President and He’s ‘Totally Serious’ About Doing It

Olive Garden’s Never-Ending Pasta Regulation Becomes Unlikely Election Integrity Rallying Point for Conservatives

Rubio’s call to combat global funders of far-left terrorism could put Singham in crosshairs

Darline Graham considering running for full a Senate term as memorial services set for Lindsey Graham: report

Appeals court sets September hearing over dismissal of James Comey and Letitia James cases

Watch: The Time Gingrich Nailed Turncoat Megyn Kelly’s Clinton vs Trump Hypocrisy – ‘I Dare You – Say “Bill Clinton Sexual Predator”‘

Israeli Knesset dissolves after overnight legislative blitz, elections set for October

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.