NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Gavin Newsom Says Charlie Kirk Helped Him Better ‘Understand’ Christianity

China’s missile surge puts every US base in the Pacific at risk — and the window to respond is closing

In-N-Out Retires the Number 67 from Its Ordering System Over Viral ‘6-7’ Trend

Victim’s family breaks silence as Oklahoma teen in violent sex assault case avoids prison time: report

Trump addresses trio of attacks in Syria, Brown University, and Australia at White House Christmas event

Trump encourages Jewish Americans to ‘celebrate proudly’ during Hanukkah after deadly Bondi Beach shooting

Ohio Doctor Indicted for Allegedly Drugging Pregnant Girlfriend with Abortion Pills

Oversight says DC police chief ‘undermined’ accuracy of crime data

Polling Finds Pete Buttigieg Less Popular with Black Voters Than Former KKK Leader

Los Angeles Electric School Bus Bursts Into Flames, Driver Hospitalized

Trump’s election win filled Hamas with ‘fear,’ hostage held like ‘slave’ for 505 days recounts

Leaked lessons from first-year University of Illinois education course show extreme left bias: ‘Just so wrong’

Gruesome Charges: She Was a Miss Switzerland Finalist Then Her Husband Used an Industrial Blender to ‘Puree’ Her – That Was After He Cut Out Her Womb

Person of interest in custody following deadly shooting at Brown University

Platner courts progressives as Maine Senate race with Mills and Collins tightens

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.