NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Federal court blocks Newsom’s bid to shackle ICE in Trump immigration win

Dem senator likens ICE operations in American streets to oppressive British regime during Revolutionary War

Idaho murders: New book on Kohberger reveals previously unseen evidence, claims sheath could be inadmissible

Trump Rips SCOTUS a New One: Dems Don’t Need to Add Justices Because the Court Is ‘Already Packed’ for Them

Marine veteran allegedly gunned down by husband in attack outside home, police say

Biden Loves to Say His WH Bid Was Sparked by Charlottesville Rally, Which DOJ Says the SPLC Helped Plan

Trump claims Iran ‘starving for cash,’ ‘collapsing financially’ after extending ceasefire

EXCLUSIVE: Planned Parenthood set for massive taxpayer windfall if Senate fails to act

China decries Japanese prime minister for World War II shrine support

Anthropic’s moral compass architect suggested AI overcorrection could address historical injustices

Supreme Court liberals side with Clarence Thomas on Taliban suicide bomber lawsuit, 3 others dissent

ActBlue employees pleaded the Fifth 146 times in depositions. Here’s what they didn’t want to answer

Myrtle Beach man with lengthy arrest record charged with stabbing two people in popular beach destination

Sheriff leading Nancy Guthrie probe admits quitting past police job to dodge discipline

Iran Opens Fire on Three Ships in Strait of Hormuz, Seizes Two of Them

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.