NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Schiff silent on Biden-era Newsom probe report as California AG claims DOJ ‘weaponization’

Transgender former New Hampshire state representative sentenced to 33 years for child sex abuse: report

WATCH: Boozy boaters unleash wild riverfront brawl as fists fly at popular South Carolina sandbar

Clarence Thomas and Two Fellow Conservatives Form Unexpected Majority with Two Liberals in SCOTUS Decision

Satanic: Muslim Pedophiles Told UK Girls That Being Raped Would Take Away Their Sins

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Gilgo sentencing, a warning from ‘Happy Face,’ Mangione psychs himself out

Washington hosts relatively muted Juneteenth compared to America 250 events

Watch: Trump Physically Supports Marine Maj. James Capers, 88, Before Awarding the Unkillable Vietnam Vet the Congressional Medal of Honor

Reporter’s Notebook: How Trump’s surprise move on DNI confirmation upended key Senate deal on FISA

DOJ warns former red state is becoming the next California as governor embraces ICE limits

Trump-Meloni spat grows over claim Italian PM ‘begged’ for photo: ‘astonished’

SEE IT: Dem senator downplays security threat of illegal immigration after White House terror plot

Gilgo Beach serial killer’s ex-wife says he ‘got what he deserved’ after he gets max sentence for 8 murders

Breaking: US Brokers Lebanon Ceasefire After Escalation Derails Peace Talks with Iran

UK’s Prime Minister Directed 13,000 Suspected Pedophiles Get Warning Letters Instead of Prosecution, According to Rape Gang Report

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.