NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

‘Fiction’: House Republican campaign chair dismisses Democrats’ expanding GOP target map

Government shutdown hits DHS after Democrats blow up bipartisan funding deal over immigration uproar

DHS enters shutdown after Congress skips town without deal on ICE

AI tool Claude helped capture Venezuelan dictator Maduro in US military raid operation: report

Federal agent attacked and hospitalized during anti-ICE protest in Downtown LA

Pima County sheriff no stranger to controversy as criticism in Nancy Guthrie case ramps up

US military launches deadly strike on drug-trafficking vessel in the Caribbean, leaving 3 dead

Liability or useful foil? Trump takes center stage in Susan Collins reelection fight

Schumer’s ‘E. coli’ burger photo resurfaces after another Dem’s grilling skills get torched: ‘What is that?’

Rubio steps into Munich spotlight as Trump leans on him to carry Vance’s populist message abroad

Trump ousts judge-installed prosecutor; constitutional expert says Article II leaves no doubt

Texas Dem Senate primary fractures over race rhetoric as ‘mediocre’ jab, ‘oppressor’ remarks ignite backlash

Irish dancing groups in the hot seat after trans dancer qualifies for multiple female world championships

Anti-ICE chaos erupts at blue state county board meeting after panel endorses detention center

Mexican Restaurant Owner Under Fire for Offering ICE Agents Free Meals Fires Back at Leftists: ‘They Need to Look for Jesus’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.