NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

National Gun Group Estimates Americans Own Over a Combined 500 Million Firearms

Victor Davis Hanson Says He’s Lucky to Be Alive After Complication During Major Operation

RNC chair bets on ‘secret weapon’ to defy midterm history, protect GOP majorities

The awkward question that Josh Shapiro won’t answer

Guerrilla-like ‘ICE Watch’ groups backed by top, left-wing grantmakers

The frenetic charm of ‘Marty Supreme’

Latin Kings gang member accused of vandalizing FBI vehicle, stealing government property in Minneapolis

Suspect accused of killing sleeping passenger on Chicago train filmed himself carrying out attack: prosecutors

Noem names Charles Wall ICE deputy director following Sheahan resignation

Tom Homan offers to pull ICE from Minneapolis ‘real quick’ upon access to jails

WATCH: ICE takes down illegal alien who allegedly rammed law enforcement vehicles, nearly running over officer

Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

As Trump Contemplates Invoking the Insurrection Act Against Minnesota, Washington’s Example as President Is Instructive

Florida teens buried alive in deadly sand tunnel collapse

Women’s sports on the line as Supreme Court wrestles with defining ‘sex’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.