NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump to honor Artemis II astronauts who traveled farther from Earth than any humans in history

Trump fires back after protester interrupts Myrtle Beach rally for Graham: ‘Mom is voting for us’

More Westerners Waking up to Islam as Gov’t Bans Face Coverings, Leaving Both Muslims and (Ironically) Feminists Angry

Trump rally security ejects protester wearing ‘kill your local pedophile’ shirt

Candace Cameron Bure Tears Up on Air Over Constant Criticism, But God Provided a Literally Perfect Smile Through the Pain

Fauci’s lawyers launch legal defense fund as federal, state investigations mount against him

‘Escalating Pressures’ from the FCC Have Impacted ‘The View’s’ Guest List: Disney Lawsuit

Late-night bull run ends with a little cowboy know-how on busy California highway

They Never Learn: NYT Ordered to Pay $9 Million After Falsely Linking Innocent Student to 2023 Murder

New Jersey mother allegedly drunk when boat hit channel marker on Memorial Day, killing her son

Texas Gov Abbott asks the Justice Department to investigate ‘discriminatory’ Islamic washing stations

DOJ says Rubio should have final say over Foreign Service board in latest bid to tighten executive powers

Trump Announces Deal to ‘Substantially Lower the Price of Ground Beef’

Chinese Man Charged with Illegally Voting in US Election and Trying to Frame Someone Else

Vance unloads on El-Sayed over Sharia remarks: ‘That’s not my grandpa’s Democratic Party’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.