NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Post-Maduro, pressure builds on Mexico over Cuba’s new oil lifeline

Trump’s immigration crackdown in the spotlight ahead of midterms as fatal MN shootings ignite backlash

Mainstream Democrats direct funds to anti-ICE protests carried out by ‘communist’ groups in Minneapolis

Anti-ICE agitators arrested outside Minnesota hotel as police declare unlawful assembly: ‘No longer peaceful’

Report: Trump Sending In the Great Tom Homan to Personally Take Command in Minneapolis and Reassigning Bovino After Shooting

Shirtless Florida man who jumped through Taco Bell window, robbed it with ‘large rock’ sentenced to 4 years

Sewage spill sends E coli surging in the Potomac River near DC

Feds charge 87 individuals in massive ATM ‘jackpotting’ operation linked to Tren de Aragua gang

Mamdani’s early moves as mayor clash with affordability pledge: ‘Ripple effects are significant’

Trump admin wins court victory freeing ICE agents from Minnesota protest restrictions

DOJ could soon ask Supreme Court to consider legal battle over Trump-appointed US attorneys

Trump has ‘very good’ call with Minneapolis Mayor Frey, announces border czar Homan meeting

ALERT: US Holocaust Museum Responds After Tim Walz Invokes Anne Frank’s Name, Calls Exploiting Holocaust ‘Deeply Offensive’

GOP senator demands DHS immigration chiefs testify after fatal shootings in Minnesota

Conservative Party defections to Reform UK continue with former home secretary

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.