NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

London mayor denies removing Star of David from fireworks show

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul Copies One of Trump’s Signature Policies

Mamdani vows to govern as ‘democratic socialist’ and embrace big government

At Least It Wasn’t Snakes: Disney Employee Injured After Errant ‘Indiana Jones’ Boulder Falls off Track

Inside Trump’s first-year power plays and the court fights testing them

Jack Smith Gives Telling Non-Answer When Asked the Key Trump Question During Deposition

Colorado Man Sentenced to Prison in Nationwide Child Sexploitation Scheme – Given 1 Year for Each of His 84 Victims

The road ahead for transit in New York City in 2026 includes fare hikes

5 big immigration changes taking effect across the US

China’s global aggression check: Taiwan tensions, military posturing and US response in 2025

Here are the top US cities Trump could target with National Guard deployments in 2026

White House race underway: With 2026 looming, both parties are already playing for 2028

Humiliating: CNN’s New Years Eve Show Descends Into Debauchery Yet Again

Even if Minnesota’s Somali-Owned Day Cares Aren’t Fraudulent, They Still Represent a Big Problem

Black Republican calls for total, permanent abolition of DEI: ‘I want to earn every opportunity on merit’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.