NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

A Warning Charlie Kirk Gave Back in 2020 Coming True Now Within Democratic Party

French citizen who illegally cast ballot in 2022 midterms says New Jersey automatically registered him to vote

Dems put on blast over poll that shows record-low patriotism in US: ‘Tear our society apart’

Real Man: Churchgoer Can’t Find Tool to Free Kids from Sweltering Car, Says ‘My Fist Will Probably Work,’ Then, With God’s Help, Starts Smashing Glass

Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’

Rashida Tlaib Defends Antifa Member Sentenced to 100 Years for Attempted Assassination, Calls Punishment ‘a Travesty and Totally Unjustified’

Watch: Sophie Cunningham’s Death Stare Went Super Viral as She Considered Smashing Heads to Defend Caitlin Clark

Colorado mom allegedly bought alcohol daily for 16-year-old daughter found dead with 173 empty bottles

WATCH: AOC won’t rule out Senate bid after New York progressives notch primary wins: ‘Inspired and encouraged’

Chinese drone monopoly put on notice amid concerns over CCP spying: ‘Strategic mistake’

Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms

Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit

Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law

WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’

USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule

See also Alan Greenspan dies at age 100

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.