NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Where Trump, GOP vs Democrats redistricting battle heads next in wake of key court rulings

Harris accuses Trump allies of trying to ‘rig’ 2026 midterms after Virginia court tosses redistricting measure

Minnesota nonprofit accused of siphoning $6.5M to fund Vegas trips, luxury cars, private liquor store

Alabama mother sentenced to life for hiring hitman to kill her child’s father over custody dispute

Trump warns college sports could be ‘lost forever’ as committee pushes changes, Congress urged to act

Duffys fire back after Pete Buttigieg, husband attack new road trip TV series: ‘Radical, miserable left’

Breathtaking ‘Chandelier UFO’ Video Goes Viral – But Is There a Simple Explanation?

Nearly a dozen injured after possible boat explosion at popular Florida tourist destination

Seth Moulton closing gap on progressive Democrat Ed Markey in Massachusetts Senate primary

Breaking: Bobby Cox, Manager of Braves ‘Teams That Ruled NL,’ Dead at 84

Two police officers shot, suspect ‘actively firing at police’ in Syracuse standoff lasting hours: report

Mob Attacks Indian Pastor and His Family as Villagers Try to Drive Him Away from Home

Virginia mother charged with murder after allegedly drowning her 17-month-old twin boys in bathtub: report

Shocking video shows giant black plume of smoke rising from Tennessee plastic recycling facility fire

Guess Where Hundreds of Uncounted Ballots Were Just Found in California – Hint: It’s One of Dems’ Favorite Places

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.