NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

House Republicans unveil national memorial plan honoring Americans killed by illegal immigrants

House Democrat pushes Senate to reverse Trump federal union order after GOP revolt by 20 Republicans

‘Every Dollar Possible’: Trump Admin Cracks Down on States That Put Illegal Drivers on the Road

Luigi Mangione judge weighs ‘potentially fatal’ evidence in fight over search of suspect’s backpack: attorney

Wounded National Guardsman is making ‘extraordinary progress,’ can breathe on his own: doctor

Former Teacher of the Year Arrested on Cruelty to Children Charges

Where things stand nationally on redistricting following Indiana defeat

Bolivian foreign minister says ‘arms are open’ to US and approves of Trump strategy in South America

SEE IT: Feeding Our Future fraudsters bought mansions and Mercedes with $250M in stolen meal funds

Progressive powerhouses launch primary war against Democratic establishment ahead of 2026 elections

Good News for Charlie Kirk’s Family: Legal Expert Says Evidence Against Robinson Is ‘Strongest’ He’s Ever Seen

38-Year-Old Able-Bodied Man Irate After Losing Food Stamps Under Trump

After Australia passes social media ban lawmakers probed on why Congress hasn’t done more to protect kids

DHS to focus on arresting illegal immigrants with serious offenses amid negative polling on ICE raids: report

Justice Department sues Fulton County to obtain records related to 2020 election

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.