NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

War powers resolution fails as Senate Republicans stand by Trump on Iran

Florida AG threatens Fauci investigation after Senate hearing

Alex Murdaugh murder trial ‘egg juror’ fights to unseal state investigation into Becky Hill: report

Bryan Kohberger appointed new lawyer after Idaho murders case costs taxpayers over $8 million

Fauci’s Testimony Reminds Us of Blatant Propaganda Americans Paid For: ‘This is Why We Defunded’ NPR, GOP Senator Says

Capitol sex scandals spark push to ban House lawmakers from sleeping with staffers

One of the Most Obnoxious Leftists Made Smug Fauci Prediction, Then Scrambled for Delete Key After Disastrous Hearing Began

We Have Receipts: Four Years Ago, Fauci Said ‘Nothing to Hide,’ ‘Very Happy to Testify’ Before Congress

Can Fauci hide behind the Fifth? Game-changing Biden pardon may not provide complete cover, experts say

Watch: Seattle Top Cop Gives Absurd New Name to Criminal Gangs, Confirms He Was at Black Conference in Texas During Seattle Mass Shooting

‘Woke’ Smithsonian exhibit lionizes embattled Fauci amid conservative scrutiny of museum’s messaging

Trump accused China of an ‘election security nightmare’ but then undercut his own warning

Here’s What We Know About Key Questions Fauci Refused to Answer

How the Big Beautiful Bill became law: Trump the closer

Man sentenced to 6 months in jail for ramming car into Jewish group’s world headquarters in New York

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.