NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

‘LONG Overdue’: Trump Calls for Ukraine to Oust Zelenskyy

Watch: El-Sayed Still Can’t Condemn Dead Ayatollah Khamenei, Man Who Killed and Oppressed His Own People

Flock executive defends crime-fighting cameras as ACLU attorney questions company’s motives amid backlash

MAP IT: DOJ illegal voting crackdown sweeps 17 states as razor-thin elections face scrutiny

Delaware neighborhood on edge after masked men with apparent weapons knock on doors of homes

Trump says he’d ‘love’ to have Sen. John Fetterman as a Republican amid growing speculation

Trump says he will ‘make a decision’ on Pentagon’s plans to livestream Nidal Hasan’s firing squad execution

Toxicology reports reveal same controlled substances in 2 Ole Miss students found dead: court docs

President talks ‘Trump Ocean,’ trades jokes with Tennessee crowd as Kid Rock kicks off sprawling rally

Supreme Court climate case could bankrupt oil companies, send gas prices soaring, experts warn

Trump calls for Ukraine to replace Zelenskyy after clash over Russia diesel deal: ‘Get a new president’

Christa Pike discharged from hospital, returned to prison after botched execution, attorneys say

That Time an Activist Claimed 13 Million Blacks Are Killed by Police Each Year, Then Claimed ER Trip After the Internet Mocked Him

5-Time WNBA MVP Gets Roasted for Award Acceptance Speech That Ignores Her Past

President Trump blasts Nobel Peace Prize snub with blistering list of accomplishments: ‘WOW!’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.