NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

New York grandmother vanishes in Las Vegas as family gets mysterious texts from her phone asking for Bitcoin

Watch: ESPN Botches On-Air Tribute to Network’s Founder on the Day of His Death

Zelensky’s fired defense minister mounts political challenge by demanding new elections

Alert: Trump Resurrects Keystone XL Pipeline in Cryptic Truth Social Post, Moments After Announcing Trade Deal With Canada

The people trying to kill Trump are kooks, resistance maniacs, and Iranians: Byron York

Lindsay Clancy described a male voice ordering her to ‘kill her children and kill herself’: testimony

Police arrest 19-year-old for deadly Great Falls stabbing of woman

Turkey accuses Netanyahu of pursuing ‘expansionist’ policies after Israeli strike on Syrian airbase

California special interest groups follow Newsom into early 2028 primary states

Hegseth’s growing campaign role sparks talk of political future

‘How Weak Are You?’: Watch as Vet Who Lost Both Legs in Afghanistan Shreds Sailors Whining About Food on USS Abraham Lincoln

Minnesota prosecutor accused of billing Medicaid from commercial sex house she turned into assisted-living facility

Socialists capture major Florida victory on hit-or-miss night for Trump-endorsed primary candidates

Inside the tension that drove Trump’s South Korea alliance from ‘historic new era’ to military pullback

State of play: What to know about California showdown to replace Swalwell after massive scandal

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.