NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

‘High casualties’ feared after two powerful earthquakes rock Venezuela: USGS

Tempers Flare and Voices Are Raised as Trump and Senate Republican Go Toe-to-Toe in Closed Door Meeting

Christian Judge Who Refused to Perform Gay Weddings ‘Vindicated’ in Big Court Ruling

New York congressional primary becomes second most expensive House race ever amid AI fight

Unearthed video exposes vulnerable House Dem’s reversal on crucial issue impacting state

Feds bust a dozen for allegedly smuggling drugs and phones into prisons using ‘heavy payload drone’

Dem Congressional Candidate Caught Bringing Sex Offender Who Victimized 8-Year-Old with Him to School Event

Mamdani-Backed Candidate Who Blamed 9/11 on American ‘Capitalism and Racism’ Wins Democratic Primary

Comer probes alleged Biden collusion with gun control activists in Glock lawsuit

‘He named names’: Trump’s Senate meeting explodes into shouting match over Iran

California sues Trump EPA over move to subject state vehicle emissions waivers to congressional review

‘Free Karmelo’ mob hunted woman in bloody attack as thugs shouted support for killer, victim says

Biden judge torches Trump ICE crackdown as ‘devoid of rational explanation,’ nukes courthouse arrest policy

Letitia James fumes as Mamdani-backed socialists sweep New York primaries

Trump Suddenly Cancels Housing Bill Signing with Minutes to Spare, Demands SAVE America Act on His Desk

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.