NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

GOP firebrand lashes out at reporter over Massie allegation: ‘F— you, first of all!’

WATCH: Mace says Trump’s endorsement hasn’t sealed SC gubernatorial race: ‘It’s a dog fight’

Jill Biden says former president will live with stage 4 cancer ‘for the rest of his life,’ has slowed down

Last surviving ‘Rosie the Riveters’ honored by WWII Museum on D-Day Anniversary: ‘We can do it’

Woman allegedly choked subway rider, yelled antisemitic remarks in attack caught on video: police

Girl known as ‘Chelsea Jane Doe’ ID’d 26 years after mutilated body found hundreds of miles from home state

At least a dozen shot near festival in Ohio; manhunt for suspects underway

Steve Hilton launches ad mocking Xavier Becerra’s ’36 years’ as a career politician in California gov race

WATCH – Smug Dem Rep’s Face Goes Totally Blank After a Cool Sec. Bessent Educates Him About His Own Branch of Government

GRAPHIC: The Excuse This Islamist Gives for Raping 250 Women Shows Why Islam and the West Can’t Exist Together

Vance Enrages Starmer with His Condemnation of the Police Response to Henry Nowak’s Murder

Pennsylvania AG explains why state leads nation in Medicaid fraud convictions while others battle mass schemes

Veteran-founded bourbon brand wins $25,000 Fox Business contest: ‘Sip to remember’

Witnesses in Karmelo Anthony murder trial confirm Austin Metcalf’s words immediately after attack

Trump issues pardon to former Republican congressman convicted of insider trading

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.