NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Illinois teen stabs pregnant woman 70 times, knifes dog, sets home ablaze during Facebook Marketplace meetup

Trump admin finds California ban on notifying parents of gender transitions violated federal law

Texas killer asks victims’ families for forgiveness before becoming first execution of 2026

Georgia assistant principal accused of stealing nearly $1K in Walmart merchandise at self-checkout

NJ councilwoman condemns ‘ignorance’ of comparing ICE agents to Nazis during heated meeting

Trump taps Colin McDonald for newly-created role of assistant attorney general for fraud enforcement

Ilhan Omar demands impeachment of Noem amid DHS funding battle: ‘We must abolish ICE’

Video appears to show Alex Pretti spit at federal agents, violently damage SUV days before fatal CBP shooting

Ilhan Omar blames Trump’s rhetoric for surge in death threats, including spray attack: ‘So obsessed with me’

Rubio Defends Maduro Raid in Fiery Exchange with Rand Paul: ‘We Did Not Remove an Elected Official’

Breaking: New Video Reportedly Shows Alex Pretti Violently Attacking, Destroying Equipment on ICE Vehicle Days Before Shooting

Delusional Rocker Neil Young Gifts Music Catalog to Greenland, Claims It Will Help Them Cope With Trump

‘This Is Not a Game Show’: Marco Rubio Refuses to Go Along with Dem Senator’s Hearing Tactics

Did You Catch the Fatal Flaw in Obama’s Comments on the Pretti Death? It’s a Whopper That Even He Can’t Get Away With

Amazon Enacts Mass Layoffs as AI Rocks Tech Industry

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.