NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Former Dem gov in hot seat for ‘complete failure’ in ‘INSANE’ early release of thousands of inmates

House Freedom Caucus vows ‘gloves are coming off’ as FISA deadline looms

Alert: American Who Was on Hantavirus Cruise Ship Tests Positive, as 2nd Passenger Now Showing Symptoms

Frontier Plane Hits Pedestrian During Takeoff at Denver Airport

US Sanctions Foreign Entities Accused Of Sharing Satellite Imagery, Access to Arms to Prop Up Iran’s War Effort

The unexpected force keeping beef prices high and why the pressure could last for years

How Al Qaeda repositioned itself to dominate the central Sahel

Pennsylvania man accused of fatal arson after woman allegedly rejected his advances

Virginia Dems Make Glaring Errors In Rushed Court Motion To Save Gerrymandering Scheme

Hegseth says Pentagon will review Mark Kelly’s public statements about classified briefing amid ongoing feud

Rebukes of Trump’s Pick for FDA Head Miss One Critical Fact

Union-funded anti-Spencer Pratt ad sparks backlash as critics say it could help him

Students’ pre-prom gathering turns into deadly nightmare as bullets fly

Marco Rubio Reveals the Message He Delivered Pope Leo During ‘Important Meeting’ at Vatican

Mom charged with child abuse after toddler found with tattoo in ‘deplorable’ home: cops

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.