NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Preliminary autopsy reveals possible cause of death for missing 4-year-old Alabama boy Johnathan Boley

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

California driver allegedly kills 2 more people while out on bail for previous fatal crash

Picking the right fight: Congressional tensions rise in wake of Minnesota ICE-involved shooting

Thomas Paine Set America Afire with ‘Common Sense’ 250 Years Ago: Pamphlet Made Case for Revolutionary War

USDA immediately suspends all federal funding to Minnesota amid fraud investigation

California projects $3 billion deficit as outside forecasts show bigger shortfall

‘Jeopardy!’ Host Ken Jennings Wants Trump Administration Jailed, Vows to Vote for Candidate Who Will ‘Prosecute’

Trump administration to investigate refugee status of Minnesota residents

Fox News Politics Newsletter: AOC accuses Vance of believing ‘American people should be assassinated’

Hundreds of opposition members still imprisoned as Venezuela plays nice with Trump

Video: Jasmine Crockett’s Brain Breaks as She Claims Dems Were Civil After Charlie Kirk’s Murder – Let’s Go to the Video Tape

Trump wears ‘happy Trump’ pin alongside American flag during White House oil executive meeting

Shrieking BLM Leader Puts ICE Officers in Additional Danger with Sick ‘Demon’ Claim

Why the FBI can exclude state authorities from Minnesota shooting probe

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.