NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Christianity rejected, socialist streamer speaks, violence glorified

FBI’s first cyber fugitive on Ten Most Wanted list returns to US after capture in Venezuela

Blue state councilman mocked after claiming self-driving cars are ‘murdering’ pets: ‘Hide your cats’

Watch: Letitia James Has No Answer When Reporter Points Out Big Problem with Her Cornell Move

DNA Test Leads to Adopted Man Learning His Biological Father Is a Rock-and-Roll Legend

Watch: Reporter Narrowly Dodges ‘Murder Attempt’ While Filming Outside ‘Taxpayer Funded Drug Dealing Operation’

‘Cornell 7’ Case Turns Political as Kathy Hochul Gets Involved with Executive Order

FBI overhauls tech backbone to counter AI threats from foreign adversaries, reduce response times, Patel says

Gypsy Rose Blanchard’s partner, Ken Urker, found dead inside his Louisiana home: sheriff

Amazon expands Prime settlement payouts: Do you qualify?

Dems demanding Venezuela brief face State Department fury as senators leave town without answers

VA University in Legal Trouble After Trying to Take Control of Christian Student Groups but Ignoring Muslims

DOJ Considering Whether Prosecutor’s Office Committed Misconduct Against Nixon: Report

Obama judge halts Trump firing bid as decades-old legal authority tees up possible major reversal

Somali former aide to Minneapolis mayor sentenced in Feeding Our Future fraud case

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.