NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Republicans Hold Historic Advantage Over Democrats As Midterms Approach, Says CNN Data Guru

Israel issues ‘urgent’ warning to Iranian civilians to ‘refrain’ from train travel

Obama Center takes heat as critics cry foul over ID rules for free entry — while Dems blast voter ID laws

Watch: Hegseth Describes Pilot’s Miraculous Easter Rescue in Terms the Godless Biden Admin Wouldn’t Dare Utter

New poll reveals Spanberger’s popularity is plummeting amid backlash over gerrymandering

Mamdani unveils new ‘racial equity plan’ for more ‘equitable future’ that prompts quick DOJ pushback

Bald-headed killer smiles as prosecutors reveal what she did before dad walked in

Tim Walz-Appointed Judge Throws Out All Charges Against Woman Accused of Interrupting Easter Service

AI-backed super PAC expands into multiple GOP primaries after claiming early wins

Trump roasts Biden over autopen use in viral interaction with kids at White House Easter Egg Roll

Repeat offender with 19 felonies busted after wild caught-on-camera chase: police

Trump Says Media Leak Jeopardized Iran Rescue, Threatens Reporter with Jail

Finally: Thanks to Pete Hegseth, American Servicemen Are No Longer Sitting Ducks on Their Own Bases

Orban accuses Ukraine of terrorist plot against pipeline amid uphill election battle

Girl who survived brutal Florida shark attack returns to waters where it happened: ‘She’s fearless’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.