NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump Gives Compassionate Response to Renee Good’s Father, Calls Her Likely ‘Wonderful’ Under ‘Normal Circumstances’

‘Where Was the Outrage?’: Father of 21-Year-Old Woman Killed By Illegal Rips Renee Good Protesters

One of Tyler Robinson’s last meals as a free man may have been a steak dinner — medium rare

Spanberger takes swipe at Trump admin, says Virginians worried about ‘recklessness coming out of Washington’

Police warn of ‘door kicking challenge’ that can turn viral prank ‘from funny to fatal’

Illegal immigrants rack up $1B+ in Texas hospital costs in FY 2025, total likely higher: report

US congressional delegation visits Denmark amid backlash over Trump’s push to acquire Greenland

81 GOP Lawmakers Just Voted to Fund an Elite Org That Exists to Elect Democrats and Suppress MAGA

Barbarians at the Gate: What Leftist in Minneapolis Said As Rioters Attempted to Storm ICE Facility Proves We Need the Insurrection Act Now

Fetterman’s former progressive backer says he ‘sold us out,’ escalates efforts to primary Democrat senator

‘Scourge’ of sexual predators, violent criminals being removed from Minneapolis streets despite backlash

Democrat insider rips Mamdani bidet hopes for Gracie Mansion, cites Trump White House bathroom reno hypocrisy

Somali City Council Member Resigns Days After Being Sworn in Over Criminal Charges

Oregon city reverses vote, removes convicted murderer from police review board after backlash

Woke Christian Artist Releases Song Tying J6 to Woodstock

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.