NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

NYC Judge Frees Man Accused of Shooting Service Dog of Woman with Down Syndrome While Attempting to Kill Man

Big Bend border wall construction pause extended to September

DOJ Arrests Honduran Man Accused of Taking Advantage of California’s Weak Election Laws

At March on Washington, an urgent plea for black voters to turn out in the midterm elections

LGBTQ group reveals which Dem nominee is sponsoring Halloween event featuring drag shows

Appeals court denies Peter Navarro bid to rehear contempt challenge: ‘Always headed to Supreme Court’

Woman accused of defacing WWII Memorial with spray paint indicted by federal grand jury

Woody Harrelson Formally Asks UK’s New Prime Minister to Probe COVID ‘Vaccine Injury’

Watch: Dems’ New ‘Anti-Zionism’ Is Really Anti-Semitism, And It Only Takes 30 Seconds for Biggest Game Streamer in the World to Explain It

Judge throws out Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s 9/11 confession in already long wait for trial

Trump vows ‘powerful appeal’ after another federal court rejects hush money case

Three sentenced for Feeding Our Future fraud at Minnesota meal sites

Reagan-era official warns ‘red-green alliance’ has shared goal of ‘destroying’ America

Antifa-linked sites go dark after State Department terror designation of tech collective

Jerry Sandusky granted new evidentiary hearing after accuser recants testimony

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.