NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Church cans patriotic staple on Biden’s posh vacation enclave — pastor says tradition ‘doesn’t cut it’

Platner’s ‘living on the sea’ claim dismantled by critics as financial docs paint a different picture

Trump-pardoned MPD officers sue US over fatal pursuit prosecution

Voter fraud or a ‘red mirage’? Why Spencer Pratt’s fate and the LA mayoral results are so complicated

Steve Hilton says ‘world is laughing’ at California’s vote counting process as he pushes reform plan

Alex Murdaugh murder case gets new judge as retrial looms following Supreme Court reversal

Trump Admin to Strip US Citizenship from Foreigners Suspected of Immigration Fraud in Historic Crackdown

New video shows Coast Guard’s Bahamas hunt as team dives into forensics exam of seized Lynette Hooker dinghy

‘Depraved Things’: Watch Fetterman Blast Platner, Challenge Him to Prove He Didn’t Send ‘D*** Pics’ to Underage Girls

Apostasy: Talarico Pastor’s Perverted Christianity – Calling God ‘Him’ Is Violent, St. Paul Is a ‘Creep,’ and Mary’s a Myth?

Politico Site Folds a Year After Trump Admin Ended Taxpayer Funding

Stunningly low percentage of adults in US think America stands above every other nation: poll

SEE IT: Maine voters sound off on Platner’s divisive campaign as crucial primary nears: ‘He’s a disgrace’

Pope Leo says ‘scourge’ of Catholic Church sexual abuse scandals calls for ‘real paths to healing’

Five Stabbed in Apparent Random Attack Inside New York City’s Penn Station

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.