NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Will Ferrell’s ‘The Hawk’ is unfunny and uninspired

Vincent Pastore, 1946-2026

Mexican national faces federal charges after CBP finds $238K in fentanyl inside electric moped

NYPD cop found guilty of chokehold in first conviction since restraint tactic banned after George Floyd death

Detransitioners reveal how doctors pushed them toward life-altering treatment as teens

White House exposes ‘Transshipment Scam’ costing US up to $26B, points finger at China

Live bullet found aboard United flight forces passengers off plane for security sweep at Denver airport

Woke Colorado School District Teaches 5-Year-Olds Sexual Anatomy Using Images So Bad We Refuse to Post Them – By Age 7, It Gets Far Worse

Marco Rubio gets 68 new jobs in epic White House birthday gift inspired by viral meme

Watch: Bystander Appears to Capture New B-21 Raider Stealth Bomber Flying Low Over Wichita

HHS warns Texas hospitals against denying life-saving care to newborn with disability

Exclusive: Oklahoma Police Chief Cancels City’s Flock Safety Contract After Citizens Raise Privacy Concerns

Gun rights groups capitalize after judge reverses decades-old restrictions: ‘Monumental’

Federal appeals court restores Texas mail ballot ID requirements in major election integrity ruling

Legal Expert: Don Lemon’s Legal Battle Could Have Devastating Unintended Consequences for Abortion Clinics

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.