NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Invasion of Texas: Dallas-Fort Worth Airport to Put Islamic Foot Wash Stations in Bathrooms

Watch: CNN Data Analyst Admits People Simply ‘Don’t Care’ About Left-Wing Climate Alarmism Anymore

Justice Department slams ‘politically motivated demands’ of DC Council asking govs to remove National Guard

Mamdani’s openness to campaigning with Hochul shows how far they’ve come

DOJ threatens California with lawsuit over ‘unbroken pattern’ of sexual abuse in women’s prisons

Trump admin marks 15 straight months with zero border releases as apprehensions plunge 94%

Slain NJ mom Brooke Hanlon’s family backs investigators two months after her stabbing death

Postpartum mom Lindsay Clancy on trial for murder brings court to a halt with sudden breakdown

Trump State Department Axes Biden-Era Initiative That Sought to Spread DEI Around the World

Why She Left: Details of Karoline Leavitt’s (Not So) Abrupt Departure and Just How Much Trump Adores Her

California Dem ripped for ‘perverted agenda’ ahead of fundraiser at risqué nightclub

GOP congressman’s ex-wife sues, alleging sensitive image of 2-year-old daughter was posted online

Extremism expert hailed as ‘terrific’ by ex-Biden official slapped with federal charges

Florida State University hit with federal civil rights investigation over race, sex-based scholarship programs

Dinesh D’Souza Shows the Truth of the Bible Through Biblical Archaeology

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.