NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Mossad Director Meets with US Officials in DC as Trump Resists Netanyahu’s Calls to Reignite Iran War: Report

‘Traitor!’: Jeffries gets rude awakening at Democratic convention as heckler erupts

Justice Samuel Alito Warns Congressional Democrats Have the Ability to ‘Turn Off the Lights’ for the Supreme Court

Schumer’s former ally mounts leadership challenge as Democrats face rare internal power struggle

Undercover Israeli agents will testify in Louisiana against alleged Oct. 7 terrorist: Judge

Alaska is still counting votes more than a week after Election Day: What to know

Trump’s spy chiefs put Republican leaders on the clock over ‘huge priority’ as power shift looms over Congress

The mistake newly-elected Dems admit they can’t afford to make with Trump after sweeping 2026 wins

Mamdani Set to Disband NYPD’s Counterterrorism and Protest Response Unit: Report

Fact Check: No, Guard Did Not Yell at Hegseth at Tomb of the Unknown Soldier – Just Watch Raw Video and Listen

Rubio’s next move? Lawyers eye speech of ‘visionary’ leader for 2028 clues after GOP’s midterm wipeout

Empire State Building climbers face deportation fears after attorney claims plea deal fell apart

Schumer’s Senate leadership fight intensifies as key progressive backs challenger and more top headlines

Tough Guy Viciously Attacks Family Over Christian Tract in Halloween Candy, Then Becomes Total Coward When Internet Tracks Him Down

Huge GOP election losses spur debates about populist economics

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.