NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Woke Formula One Driver Visits, Condemns Wall Imprisoning Palestinians – Clearly Has No Idea Egypt Actually Built It

The Genius Voting System We Could Use That Rewards Working, Military Service, and Age – Penalizes Taking Welfare, Being Criminal

Anti-Trump Republican courts other defectors as House weighs another vote against Iran war

Florida Republican on Democrats’ strategy: ‘That’s the choice they have to make…persecution or policy’

Watch: Baby Saved from Planned Parenthood After Sidewalk Counselor Convinces Father to Intervene

Struggling Canadian Vet Calls VA for Help, Says Caseworker Suggested He Consider Killing Himself With Canada’s New ‘Assisted Dying Service’

Inside the House GOP strategy to capitalize on Democrats’ warring factions in the new Congress

Trump keeps signaling an end to Iran war, but expert warns a crucial piece of his strategy is missing

Republicans unwilling to force an end to Iran war despite midterm beating

Richard Fowler wins Washington Examiner election contest

Democrat flips Alaska governor’s mansion after Trump-backed GOP infighting

Rubio’s Federalist Society performance fuels 2028 fire: ‘If he runs, he’ll be formidable’

Storybook Wedding … in a Swamp? Couple Opts for a Shrek Wedding, Hoping for Their Happily Ever After

Chicago’s Chief Financial Officer Abruptly Quits Rather Than Be Forced to ‘Compromise’ Her ‘Integrity’

Newly Elected House Democrat Admits He Is Under Investigation for Sexual Harassment

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.