NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump says China ‘spies’ on US after report ties Chinese imagery to Iran strike

California football coach arrested after students make disturbing discovery at school

Maryland dad blamed ‘Satan’ after 2-month-old daughter died from horrific head trauma

Trump offers update on White House press secretary sweepstakes

Trump unloads on AOC, Mamdani for laughing during sacred 9/11 ceremony at Ground Zero

GOP gov candidate recounts miracle water landing as dispatch audio reveals desperate search for sinking plane

Trump says Lindsay Clancy case is a ‘state situation’ following attorney’s pardon plea

Charlie Kirk statue defaced with red paint, Jesus crossed out days after 1-year mark of assassination

Arrest rips apart media narrative on death of Black woman found hanging from Mississippi tree

Trump tells Zelenskyy to stop doing ‘one thing’ during attacks on Russia

Election chaos in this red state just got even stranger for Republicans after Supreme Court ruling

The Left Loves ‘Land Acknowledgements’: Here’s One That Honors Our Forefathers and Actually Tells the Truth About Native Tribes

Arizona Corrections Officer Arrested for Smuggling 5,400 Rounds of Ammo for Mexican Drug Cartel

You’ve Never Heard of This Potential US Partner, But Their Minerals Could Help Us Take on China

3 House Democrats Visit ICE Detention Center to Meet with Illegal Aliens with Deportation Orders

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.