NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Elon Musk warns ‘people will die’ over Mamdani’s FDNY commissioner pick, Lillian Bonsignore

FBI ramps up counter-drone efforts as Patel warns of growing threats from criminals, terrorists

Florida bell ringer allegedly tries to ‘impale’ store manager with donation tripod while drunk

Year in focus: Images that defined America in 2025

Affordability: The issue that boosted Trump and Republicans in 2024 deflated them in 2025

We’re Headed for a ‘Build, Baby, Build’ Energy Revolution in 2026

Murder in small-town America: The crimes that tore quiet communities apart in 2025

Texas father rescues kidnapped daughter by tracing her phone’s location, sheriff’s office says

2025 shockers: The biggest moments that rocked the campaign trail

They Got Her: FBI Caught Hillary Clinton Talking Donations with Foreign Felon on Tape

The True Story of St. Nicholas Is Much Better Than the Myths About Reindeer and the North Pole

Schumer Sinks to Lowest Approval Rating of All US Political Leaders

Most shocking examples of Chinese espionage uncovered by the US this year: ‘Just the tip of the iceberg’

Crime lords turn Motor City into car-theft supermarket for Middle East buyers: ‘Somebody’s getting paid’

LeBron’s Friend and Head Coach Eviscerates His Team After Christmas Meltdown: ‘Don’t Care Enough to Be a Professional’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.