NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Massachusetts lesbian bar ignites fury after easing mask rules for one night a week

Mamdani fires back at Netanyahu, calls Israeli leader ‘architect of horrific genocide’ ahead of UN visit

Florida AG accuses teacher of labeling student a ‘misogynist’ over ‘conservative views’: ‘She should be fired’

Texas man charged with capital murder after 5-year-old killed in roadway shooting

Harris keeps 2028 door open as she hits midterm campaign trail, warns ‘28 won’t matter’ without 2026

Takaichi and victim families make multifront plea for US to help Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea

‘Big Sister’ warning resurfaces as Massachusetts expands home visits after Clancy trial

White House Official Says Fox News and Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Have ‘Revealed Themselves for Who They Truly Are’

El-Sayed’s Trump-Backed Opponent Breaks with POTUS on Iran: ‘We Have to Bring Prices Down’

Kamala Harris says ‘attack on DEI is an attack on maternal care’ in appearance with El-Sayed

Netanyahu Sends Warning to Mamdani Ahead of Trip to NYC: ‘I’m Gonna Tell the Truth About You’

Trump Attempts to Officially Give AI a New ‘Much More Accurate’ Name During UN Address

Chuck Grassley doesn’t rule out investigating Trump Jr.’s Russian-funded wedding party

From Austin to New York, pro-China network fuels week of anti-US protests as Xi meets Trump

No Wonder Dem Don’t Want to Give up Voter Rolls: DHS Investigating 300K Cases for Voter Fraud, Thanks to States’ Voter Rolls

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.