NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

US Agency Releases Startling Report on Anti-Christian Persecution in Major Islamic Country

Inside the US military playbook to cripple Iran if nuclear talks collapse

Spain readies for evacuations as a hantavirus-hit cruise ship heads for the Canary Islands

California abortion pill suppliers plot workarounds ahead of Supreme Court mifepristone decision

Accused street takeover mastermind charged after wild stunts, machine gun chaos: police

Catfish Farmers, Undertakers, Miners Celebrate Major Trump Admin EPA Deregulation

Connecticut pro-Second Amendment group sounds alarm on Glock-style ban, fear Democrats will go even further

California professor accused of killing pro-Israel protester will ‘likely’ avoid lengthy prison sentence

Watch As Democrat Xavier Becerra Calls Migrant Kids Lost Under His Watch MAGA Talking Point

LGBTQ ‘lavender graduations’ set to take place at major Christian colleges, including one with a drag show

Fact Check: No, Kash Patel Is Not Having Custom Bourbon Made on the FBI’s Dime

All gas, no brakes: Wild moments in Trumpworld this week that captured attention

Trump throws his base a UFO bone, but critics say it’s Iran ‘smoke and mirrors’

Two-party politics ‘dead and buried’ in UK after local election bloodbath

Democrats shy away from questions on whether Harris should run for president in 2028

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.