NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

It never ends: GOP moves to fund border, Democrats blast Trump spending

Video: Ex-Trans Speaker Postpones TPUSA Speech as Antifa ‘Militia … on Cross-Sex Hormones’ Threatens Violence Cops Weren’t Prepared for

Vance turns up heat on states with federal cash threat over Medicaid fraud crackdown

JD Vance’s Fraud Task Force Makes California Pay $1.3 Billion Price for Defrauding Taxpayers

Children’s book author sentenced for husband’s poisoning death as judge calls her ‘too dangerous’

Arrest of gang member convicted of murder puts Dem state’s sanctuary policies on blast

Red-State Governor Cancels Special Redistricting Session for Congressional Seats

DHS says two women killed six years apart in Texas should still be alive after illegal immigrant’s arrest

Lawmakers clash over Trump gas tax holiday as Iran war drives prices higher

DHS lawyer focuses blame on Biden judge after illegal immigrant release controversy

Texas Sues Netflix for Allegedly ‘Spying’ on Residents, Including Children

Warsh confirmed as next Fed chairman and will face renewed inflation threat

Age of first-time mothers hits record high in blue states as birth rates keep falling

WATCH: Dem’s Plan to Tar Patel as Alcoholic Backfires When Patel Reminds Crowd of Dem’s Own Alcohol Disgrace … and Brings Receipts

Report: After Sex Scandal Was Exposed, Swalwell Attempted to ‘Intimidate’ Women He Shared Messages with

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.