NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

CNN Analyst Breaks Down the Numbers for Dems, Reveals Their Own Voters Can’t Stand Them

Blue States Scrambling to Circumvent SCOTUS Ruling, Save Censorship of Gender Counseling

Billboard trolling Dale Warner goes viral after his murder conviction in wife Dee’s case

Watch: Inept Texas Judge Blasted After Camera Catches Him Cursing Kind Computer Tech – Now His Nasty Emails Demanding Respect Have Leaked, Too

One of a Kind Video: Kid Rock Uses Apache Hovering Behind His House to Torment Gavin Newsom

America’s Decaying Highways Are About to Get Much Worse Thanks to Key Fund’s Demise

Tax day is next week: Avoid these 5 common mistakes that can cost you money

Thousands of Christian Families Are Facing Eviction in This Muslim Country

Trump admin urges restoring ballroom construction in emergency motion: ‘Time is of the essence’

Philadelphia man stabs Planet Fitness worker after getting banned from gym: police

Inside the daring rescue of airman behind enemy lines: How CIA assisted with ‘deception campaign’

Trump Admin to Investigate School District Accused of Putting Girls in Danger Over ‘Gender Identity’ Policy

Ex-Fox News Regular Suggests Trump’s US Is Beginning to Mirror North Korea

Trump vows US will strike Iran’s power plants, bridges if Strait of Hormuz is not reopened

Art heist targeting million-dollar masterpieces exposes blind spots in museum defenses, expert warns

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.