NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Iran vows ‘decisive’ self-defense at UN after Trump kills supreme leader in Operation Epic Fury

Concerns rise over DHS shutdown in shadow of Iran strikes: ‘Now would be a good time’ to end it

Man confesses to killing 7-year-old while on the lam after DNA links him to 30-year cold case: authorities

Obama official who backed Iran deal sparks online outrage with reaction to Trump’s strike: ‘Sit this one out’

Bill Clinton’s credibility threatened by decades of scandals amid grilling over Epstein ties

Trump says Khamenei is dead: ‘The single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their Country’

Monitoring the situation: White House releases photos of Trump, Rubio and team being briefed on Iran operation

Iran Supreme Leader Targeted, Believed Killed, in Sweeping US-Israeli Strikes

The US and Israel attacked Iran: What we know

Trump finds unlikely Democratic allies on decision to strike Iran

Democrats buck party leaders to defend Trump’s ‘decisive action’ on Iran

Nancy Guthrie missing: Forensic scientist encourages new investigative approach since case ‘isn’t cold yet’

FBI raises counterterror teams to high alert amid Iran tensions

Bipartisan revolt targets Trump’s war powers after massive Iran strikes

Iran strikes erase ‘space’ between Trump and Netanyahu, insiders say

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.