NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump Wins Again: Final Epstein Docs Nail Huge Dems, Dem Supporters, and Anti-Trumpers – Here Are the Top 7 (Plus 5 Smug Leftist Celebs from the Earlier Docs)

Trump speaks with Chinese President Xi Jinping on range of issues including Russia-Ukraine war

Trump’s Iran threats face ‘Obama red line’ test as White House pivots to diplomacy

Afghan national accused in DC National Guard shooting pleads not guilty, prosecutors may seek death penalty

Alert: Mitch McConnell, 83, Has Been Hospitalized According to His Office

Ohio woman convicted in shooting of bystander during New Year’s love triangle dispute

Former Capitol Police officer running for Congress in different district than failed 2024 bid

Federal judge grills DOJ lawyers over censure of Democratic senator

Video: Joy Behar Compares Cities Church to Dachau Concentration Camp Where Jews Were Frozen Alive – Single Most Evil Thing Ever Said on ‘The View’

Patriots QB Drake Maye Quotes Bible at Super Bowl Media Day, Hopes to Lead Others to Jesus

Vote ‘no’ but take the dough: Senate Democrats claim credit for bill they opposed

Newsom’s PAC takes cash from firm promising to win state contracts for clients

Judge rules federal agents must limit tear gas at protests near Portland ICE building

Trump admin sued by New York, New Jersey over Hudson River tunnel funding freeze: ‘See you in court’

Girl, 12, dangles from ski chairlift in California before crashing to ground in terrifying video

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.