NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Karen Bass appears to liken Spencer Pratt to Trump amid tightening LA mayoral race

Hasan Piker defends pro-communist, anti-ICE Singham network activists as ‘wonderful people’

California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus

Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter

Trump floats replacing 250th anniversary concert with massive MAGA rally after artists pull out

Senate candidate Graham Platner sent explicit texts to multiple women while married, wife says: report

Delaney Hall protests intensify as far-left activists, ICE supporters converge in New Jersey

Gov. Sherrill blames ICE, defends rioters after deploying troopers to quell violent mob

What The Left’s Colorado Climate Lawsuit Is Really All About

New Yorker Sentenced To 40 Years in Prison After Slaying 4 People on a Midnight Rampage

CBS News’ Bari Weiss Fired A ’60 Minutes’ Producer Citing ‘New Approach’

Who Was in Charge? Dems Owe Answers After Jill Biden Says She Thought Joe Was ‘Having a Stroke’ During Debate

Why Does the Media Care That Has-Beens Are Withdrawing From ‘Freedom 250’ DC Event?

Watch: Mysterious Strangers Pile Out of Sewer Manhole, Prompts Police Investigation

WATCH: Disgraceful UK Police Chief Apologizes for Letting Student Bleed Out Because He Was Accused of Being a Racist

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.