NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Nancy Guthrie search stalls after authorities release detained suspect

Hypocrisy: Mainstream Media And NBA Stay Silent After Kevin Durant Tells Fan: ‘I Know Where You Live, White Boy’

Super Bowl Viewership Drops Year-Over-Year, Still Sets a Record

‘GOP’ House candidate admits she’s actually a progressive in viral video: ‘Telling people the truth’

Vance warns Iran that ‘another option on the table’ if nuclear deal not reached

The surprising reason why Americans could face high beef prices for years

Breaking the Fourth Wall: Left-wing groups defiant as GOP sheds light on groups tied to China

Grand jury rejects DOJ effort to indict Democratic lawmakers who urged military to defy illegal orders

Key House committee advances nationwide voter ID bill, setting up 2026 election fight

What the timing of the FBI’s image release suggests in the Nancy Guthrie case: crime insider

Dem senator fumes that GOP’s foreign funding claim ‘delegitimizes’ anger of anti-ICE agitators in US

Susan Collins shrugs off attacks by Democrats and Trump, says Maine voters ‘Don’t vote party line’

DOJ Unredacts Alleged Epstein Co-Conspirators After Pressure from Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna

Leavitt brushes off Lutnick–Epstein heat with list of administration wins media ignored before ending briefing

Media Reporting Trump’s Tariffs Cost Americans $1,000, But They’re Ignoring Overall Savings of His Policies

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.