NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Apex predator threatening Northwest salmon sparks rare bipartisan push to ‘kill more’

Boasberg orders Trump to bring back CECOT migrant class deported in March

Even the NYT Admits it: Trump’s Economy ‘Surged’ in Q3, Smashed Growth Expectations

Cornyn torches Democratic field, says party now ‘ruled by socialists’

Developing: Trump Announces New ‘Trump Class’ Battleships, Bigger Than Any Previous Battleships in US History

House GOP tensions erupt after moderate Republicans’ Obamacare ‘betrayal’

Repeat offender allegedly kills Ohio man just days after nonprofit pays his bail

Oregon Cattle Rancher Accuses Amazon Data Center of Poisoning Local Water Supply

Walz under fire as Minnesota mayors sound alarm on ‘financial disaster’ ahead and more top headlines

Texas Man Fatally Shoots Two People Who Allegedly Followed and Attacked Him

Trump administration installing 900-mile wall of buoys in Rio Grande

Trump admin conducts another deadly attack on ‘low-profile vessel’ perpetrating ‘narco-trafficking operations’

Media personalities who lost their jobs over news bias in 2025

White House says no to Catholic bishops’ call for Christmas pause in immigration enforcement

FCC announces ban on new Chinese-made drones over national security concerns

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.