NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

FLASHBACK: Obama tried to make Trump a punchline at 2011 dinner before rise stunned Washington

Trump cancels Witkoff and Kushner’s trip to Pakistan for Iran negotiations

U.S. Government Monitors as British Authorities Prosecute Christian Pastor Who Quoted John 3:16

Fetterman backs Wicker’s call to restart attacks in Iran

Trump to headline 2026 White House Correspondents’ Dinner for the first time as president

Rat Poison Found in Baby Food Jars Leads to Total Recall

Barricaded suspect faces murder charges after 2 doctoral students vanished from campus, 1 body remains missing

Father recalls horror after son murdered his 5 grandchildren: ‘I knew he killed them’

My Brother’s Teacher Told Him to ‘Draw What Brings You Most Joy’: Since His Answer Was the Cross, It Wasn’t Allowed

Parents in Bronx neighborhood plead for NYPD guard as Mamdani cuts cops, halts hires: ‘Horrible situation’

British Christian Nurse Accused of ‘Misgendering’ a Patient Cleared of Consequences

Radical activist groups circle wagons around Southern Poverty Law Center amid federal charges

US turns to drones after retiring minesweepers to reopen Strait of Hormuz amid Iran crisis

Russia’s Communists channel their ancestors, evoke 1917 in warning to Putin over economy

Michigan governor hopeful pressed on past SPLC work after DOJ indictment: ‘What did Jocelyn know?’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.