NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Florida puts 77-year-old man to death for deputy’s murder as state closes in on execution record

Pennsylvania Welfare Supervisor Accused of Stealing Thousands in Food Stamps, Trading Them for Crack Cocaine

Trump Announces New Fraud Bounty Program, Nick Shirley First to Cash In

Honduran illegal immigrant charged with assaulting ICE officers with hammer during New Jersey traffic stop

Watch: Abdul El-Sayed Has His Hillary Clinton ‘Hot Sauce in Purse’ Moment in Cringey, Pandering Interview

Democrats Plotting to Use Bitter Ex-Girlfriend to Take Down Elon Musk

Judge Trump called a ‘lunatic’ abruptly backs off demand after showdown with DOJ No. 3

Trump says Ilhan Omar could go to jail or be deported, calls her ‘a disgrace to our country’

Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner’s office faces subpoenas after judicial referral

Declassified Docs Show State Dept.’s Testimony During 2019 Trump Impeachment Was Radically Different from Reality

Reporter’s Notebook: A Democratic majority could expose the limits of the progressive agenda

Ilhan Omar’s daughters show up at scene of DC raid as rumors swirl about embattled rep’s whereabouts

JD Vance Calls Out Abdul El-Sayed’s Most Confusing Lie That Reveals a ‘Revulsion Toward Native-Born Americans’

Vance reveals the Trump dilemma that could complicate his 2028 White House ambitions

Italy unleashes military response to violent riots as France faces a reckoning of its own

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.