NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Thune goes all-in on campaign trail as Schumer stays on bench, faces rejection from fellow Dems

DHS investigates massive data breach exposing 40,000 employees, including ICE and Border Patrol agents

Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community

MAHA heavyweights try to put Lahn over the top in Iowa governor’s race

Mamdani Keeps Taking Over NYPD Training Facility for Personal Use, and Police Union Officials Are Furious

Bill Gates Claims Artifical Intelligence Will Force Some to Choose an ‘Amish’ Lifestyle

Watch: Anti-ICE Protesters Accidentally Infuriate Immigrants While Blocking Brooklyn Bridge

Emergency declared at South Carolina nuclear site after fire erupts at lab

Conservative Journalists James O’Keefe and Cam Higby Indicted in Minnesota After Exposing Election System in Undercover Video

Legendary Sports Announcer Who Used Platform to Honor God Announces Departure

Alaska Dems Spent Months Finding a Duplicate ‘Dan Sullivan’ to Confuse GOP Voters Ahead of Senate Race

Convicted murderer got over 5-hour head start after prison escape before local police were notified: official

Judge Overseeing Maduro Case in New York Dies Before Trial

ALERT: Dominion-Related Lawsuit Dismissed Against Patrick Byrne Over ‘The Deep Rig’ Film – No Legal Basis for Key Claim

Radicals bring life in America’s largest city to screeching halt and vandalize 9/11 Memorial

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.