NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump-Meloni spat grows over claim Italian PM ‘begged’ for photo: ‘astonished’

SEE IT: Dem senator downplays security threat of illegal immigration after White House terror plot

Gilgo Beach serial killer’s ex-wife says he ‘got what he deserved’ after he gets max sentence for 8 murders

Breaking: US Brokers Lebanon Ceasefire After Escalation Derails Peace Talks with Iran

UK’s Prime Minister Directed 13,000 Suspected Pedophiles Get Warning Letters Instead of Prosecution, According to Rape Gang Report

Republican congressman will end months-long absence from DC after missing 135 roll call votes

WATCH: Tom Hanks Painful Insult to MSNOW Interviewer Goes Viral During Obama Presidential Center Opening

Trump’s 80th Birthday Goes Off Without a Hitch, as UFC Bring Manliness, Spirit of Teddy Roosevelt Back to WH Lawn

Disgraced Murdaugh trial clerk who helped blow up murder conviction claims protection from payback lawsuit

Dem justices slap Soros-backed Philly DA with power strip in stunning decision: ‘Not reliable’

PHOTOS: Best moments from Obama’s presidential center opening

Will Dems’ targeting of California GOP-turned-Indie congressman ‘Pan’ out?

UN’s Albanese faces uphill battle with First Amendment case seeking to end sanctions against her

Interest rate cut not likely on the table, even after Iran deal and somewhat falling oil prices

US military kills three ‘narco-terrorists’ in latest lethal strike on vessel in the Eastern Pacific

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.