NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump returns to National Prayer Breakfast as faith takes center stage in second term

Republican who said Sen Cassidy ‘sucks,’ gets Trump endorsement after ditching Senate bid for House run

Teachers union leaders spent thousands at swanky resorts

Bodycam shows NYPD officer shooting man with knife as Mamdani calls for no criminal charges

Georgia GOP Rep Barry Loudermilk to retire, adding to wave of House exits

More than 200 people evaluated in Tennessee after carbon monoxide leak infiltrates university facility

FBI arrests 55 in massive drug ring with alleged China supplier flooding US streets with fentanyl

Hochul primary challenger picks democratic socialist, once arrested for harassment, as running mate

DC Democrats Turn Their Backs on the Clintons: ‘They Bring Nothing But Baggage’

Massive student immigration protest turns violent in downtown LA; dispersal order issued: police

Government lawyer who told judge ‘this job sucks’ sent back to DHS

Democrats say Clintons’ agreement to testify undercuts subpoena push, won’t bring new Epstein answers

Baltimore’s progressive mayor calls reporter ‘racist’ in heated exchange over luxury taxpayer vehicle

Joseph Gordon-Levitt slams Big Tech for sextortion, threats to children while calling for key internet reform

New York subway hearing erupts as MTA boss snaps ‘shut up’ amid grilling over guards letting fare jumpers walk

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.