NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Incredible Video: Heroic Dad Fights Off Gang of Carjackers While Protecting Daughter, Shoots 1 Dead

Knicks Tricked Employees with Fake Championship Ring-Fitting Message, Forced Clickers Into Cybersecurity Courses

Seven Christians Killed, Dozens More Wounded in ‘Heinous’ Attack on Church in Jordan

GOP Congressman Set to Initiate Expulsion Process for ‘Ilhan Omar’ Based on DOJ Findings

Ilhan Omar doubles down on ‘real name’ when confronted at Mall of Somalia

Ilhan Omar calls Trump ‘creep’ as president revives ‘fake name,’ marriage allegations

Meghan Markle’s Statement Triggers Internal Police Investigation Amid ‘Disturbing Allegations’ Against Her Father

Watch: Kamala Harris Turns Back the Clock to 2024, Confuses Crowd with Jumbled Motivational Quote That She Has to Repeat

‘Can’t trust Amy Acton’: Viral ad distracts from what’s really at stake in critical race, GOP strategist says

Federal judge kicked off ‘botch job’ anti-DEI case after stunning appeals court rebuke

Trump says judge is ‘desecrating’ Charlie Kirk’s memory amid fight over assassination trial date

Treasury traces SPLC to debanking of Christians after group dismissed it as conspiracy

Mass shooting at Jordanian church kills at least seven and wounds dozens

Polish Left pushing abortion liberalization through parliament despite looming presidential veto

Emmy-winning TV producer charged with stalking ex-wife, longtime news anchor, days after divorce

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.