NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Multiple College Football Games Rescheduled as Hurricane Isaias Approaches

James Talarico resurfaces after extended absence as his campaign pushes back

Scottish School Rebrands Christmas Cards to ‘Winter Cards’ Citing ‘Inclusivity’ Concerns

Obama the Slave Driver: Workers at Presidential Library Unionizing as Wages Frozen, Time Off Cut, and Health Care Costs Rise

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Reveals the Truth About Illegal Alien Shot by ICE in NYC, Points Finger at Mamdani and Hochul

DeSantis presses reluctant Floridians for swift evacuations as Hurricane Isaias strengthens

‘Trans girls need guns’: Terrorism inquiry puts supporter of leftist gun community behind bars

Texas think tank accuses Houston parent coalition of using ‘socialist’ tactics to push radical agenda

‘SNL’ writer’s missing sister case leads homicide detectives to Joshua Tree months after family’s murder claim

Culture clash laid bare as violent Somali gangs grip suburban communities: ‘These kids are different’

Letitia James stumped by debate question while GOP rival delivers ‘zinger for the ages’

Kash Patel announces arrest of suspected ShinyHunters co-conspirator after FBI jobs portal breach

No knockout blow: Strategists say Michigan Senate debate unlikely to shift race

Breaking: Trump Offers White House Press Secretary Job to Conservative Commentator and Former DHS Official Katie Zacharia

Watch: Walter Payton’s Son Gets Emotional as He Learns of Mike Ditka’s Death During Live Broadcast

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.