NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Breaking: UK Court Convicts Russell Brand of Rape, Star is Headed to Prison

Harmeet Dhillon resigns as Justice Department’s assistant attorney general for civil rights: sources

Alito reiterates he’s not retiring, is committed through end of current Supreme Court term

Body Language Expert Watched El-Sayed’s Smiley Victory Speech, Suggests Revenge Lurked Underneath

Khanna touts new draft committee for likely 2028 presidential bid: ‘I’m honored’

Watch: El-Sayed Supporters Celebrate Win with a Chant That Reveals Their True Priorities

Republican AGs stand ready as ‘last line of defense’ against leftist policies after dismal midterms for party

Watch: CNN Anchor Slips Up and Makes a Telling Admission While Gleefully Reporting Midterm Results

Ted Cruz delivers scathing assessment after far-left Dems sweep midterms and more top headlines

White House official details what gets Trump’s attention in intelligence briefings

Democrats already recruiting oversight staff as left-leaning law firms gear up for Trump investigations

17 years after Fort Hood massacre, victims’ families grapple with gunman’s looming execution

Where Democrats could use their landslide victories to redistrict

Republicans turn on Trump after devastating midterm losses hand Democrats control of Congress

WATCH: Bodycam captures chaotic response to deadly Citibank shooting in Florida

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.