NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Nation’s largest teachers union under fire as controversial agenda puts century-old federal charter at risk

DeSantis endorses Florida GOP slate including Byron Donalds in governor’s race

Associated Press Dismisses Government Report on Thousands of Illegals Voting in 2020 – Again

Ohio Supreme Court denies Mackenzie Shirilla’s latest appeal bid in double murder case

Haitian college student in Ohio dies by apparent suicide after losing TPS status, family says

Hasan Piker cheerleads progressives as 80-year-old senator wins six more years

Progressive push hits wall against conservative Democrat in deep-blue district

Washington homeowner hears mysterious banging, calls 911 before police find growling bobcat at top of stairs

One of Congress’ most powerful Democrats just survived a progressive primary revolt

Biden-Harris favorite gets second shot at Congress, beats Squad-backed candidate

Breaking: Intimidation Arrest Made Outside Courthouse of Lindsay Clancy Trial Setting Stage for Potential Mistrial

Tyler Robinson to face trial in Charlie Kirk assassination as judge keeps death penalty on table

Top Democrat survives double-barreled challenge as party’s Israel divide hits home

Colin Kaepernick Reemerges and Tries to Cash in on Playing the Victim

House Democrat survives left-flank challenge as Bernie volunteer mounts insurgent bid

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.