NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Watch: Bubba Wallace Sparks NASCAR Mega-Crash That Sweeps Up the Majority of the Field

Trump Calls for Jimmy Kimmel to Be ‘Immediately Fired by ABC and Disney’ After ‘Beyond the Pale’ Melania Stunt

Hakeem Jeffries doubles down on ‘maximum warfare’ rhetoric, tells critics ‘I don’t give a damn’

Illegal migrant accused of NY dumpster rape captured on Texas bus as he fled toward southern border: DA

Sun-soaked Boca Bash revelers meet badge blitz as cops flood wild floating party scene

Clip of James Carville Saying He Wants Trump ‘to Suffer’ Resurfaces Following Assassination Attempt

Karoline Leavitt Says DHS Situation Is a ‘National Emergency’ in the Wake of WHCD Shooting

Dem Senate hopefuls under scrutiny for ‘choke them out’ rhetoric after Trump attack scare

Trump admin tightens vise on student aid fraud in ‘ghost student’ crackdown

‘You Should Be Ashamed’: Trump Unleashes on CBS’ Norah O’Donnell Over Question About WHCD Gunman

Leavitt blames ‘left-wing cult of hatred’ after WHCA Dinner shooting

German chancellor says US is being ‘humiliated’ by Iran

Virginia redistricting ballot amendment faces tense questioning from state Supreme Court

Republicans rush to green light White House ballroom following third Trump assassination scare

Supreme Court hands GOP a redistricting win by striking down lower court block on Texas map

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.