NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Army chief of staff ordered to retire immediately as Hegseth continues Pentagon shakeup

Watch: Trump Declares that Because of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection, ‘Not One Thing Can Separate Humanity from the Power of God’s Everlasting Love’

Trump supporter allegedly killed by ex-coworker who expressed ‘animosity’ over political beliefs: complaint

GOP rails against ‘s— sandwich’ deal as all eyes turn to House to end DHS shutdown

Girl Who Went Missing in 1994 Found Alive

Man accused of killing parents with hammer, knife, then calling 911 to confess: report

Harris ripped over video previewing Trump speech she claims she wouldn’t watch: ‘Sit this one out’

Utter Humiliation: Watch Dem Rep Ask 100 People at Black Church to Raise a Hand if They Don’t Have ID – What Happens Next Is Priceless

Jasmine Crockett Attempts to Defend Ketanji Brown Jackson by Playing the Race Card, Accidentally Proves Conservatives’ Point

California hit with fresh setback in failed gender secrecy case costing taxpayers millions

UK hosts summit on reopening Strait of Hormuz following Trump demand: ‘Take care of it’

Pam Bondi already fired as attorney general, Cabinet official teed up as replacement: sources

Schumer, Jeffries sue Trump, accuse him of trying to ‘rig’ mail-in voting

Priceless Video: Hospice Fraudsters in CA Rip Down Sign, Flee in $200k Mercedes When Nick Shirley Pays ‘Friendly’ Visit

Nazi Tattoo-Wearing Democrat Sen. Candidate Previously Talked About Jesus Being a ‘Zombie’ and Mary a ‘Skank’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.