NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump says Putin call coming ‘very soon’ as US tracks suspected plague death in Russia

Ex-CIA official admits to $194 million fraud scheme involving gold bars

Cornell Appoints Former Acting Attorney General Who Was Fired by Trump for Insubordination to Lead Investigation

Foreign adversaries running ‘psyop’ to fuel anti-AI and anti-data center movement, war official says

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis Sucks Up to ‘The View’ by Threatening to Dox Trump’s Personal Phone Number

Unearthed social media posts contradict El-Sayed’s ‘capitalist’ narrative

Christa Pike now conscious and talking after surviving 2 doses of lethal injection drug: report

Delta Air Lines jet clips Air Canada plane on Los Angeles International Airport tarmac

Israel claims Hamas is planning Oct. 7 anniversary attack. Does it have the means to do so?

Immediate Impact Seen at CNN HQ as Paramount and Warner Bros. Finalize Controversial Mega Merger

Nebraska’s Dan Osborn says mocking Trump voters ‘came from a place of passion’

Macron trashes American free speech as riots grip France — internet unloads: ‘Enormous fool’

ICE Hunting for 2 Illegal Aliens Suspected of Stabbing an NYPD Officer 3 Years After Biden Released Them Into the U.S.

El Sayed creates ‘Mike Rogers is watching you’ website highlighting work on Patriot Act

Russian researcher’s mystery death could be ‘far worse’ than the plague, former senior Trump official warns

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.