NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Hasan Piker, cowboys, Charlie Kirk, and more: Top six takeaways from Republican midterm convention Night 2

Vance describes his hopes for baby son as he lays down a marker for 2028 with the speech of his life

Charlie Kirk supporters return to site of assassination 1 year later: ‘We are still standing’

Crowd erupts as Vance smacks down protester waving Mexican flag: ‘Get your a– over there’

Juror on Lindsay Clancy trial says ‘we let down Lindsay’ following mistrial

Top GOP senator reveals what Dem colleagues are fretting about behind closed doors

Several People Who Were Fired Over Charlie Kirk Comments Got Big Payouts or Were Given Their Jobs Back

Vance declares Democrats ‘party of hatred,’ says party has moved beyond big government, censorship

JD Vance to invoke Charlie Kirk, family ‘birthright’ in fiery midterm keynote speech thrashing Dems

FBI Busts Scheme to Use Skid-Row Homeless to Steal Voters’ Identities for Ballot Petitions

Conservatives Accuse Netflix of ‘Subtly Mocking Charlie Kirk’s Assassination,’ Call for Mass Cancellation

Patriots Announcers in Disbelief as QB Throws Away Season Opener on Final Play: ‘What Was He Thinking?’

Report: Trump No Longer Weighing Vance Vs. Rubio for 2028 – Has Made Up His Mind on Who Will Be Nominee

Judge questions possible attorney conflict in DC pipe bomber case

Watch: Dozens of Riot Police, Anti-Trump Crowd Engage in Full-on Standoff Outside RNC – Arrests Made

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.