NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Human Remains Found Near Guthrie Home Create New Mystery, Fail to Solve Current One

Can’t Make It Up: Islamic Activist Behind ‘Muslims Only’ Waterpark Day Also Runs ‘Learing’ Center of Her Very Own

Leftist streamer calls violent revolution ‘inevitable’ as Democrats explode over Virginia court decision

Top Dem applauds Trump UFO files release in rare show of support

Declassified Apollo moon docs describe unexplained mysteries, UFO lights ‘like the Fourth of July’

Breaking: Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Democrats’ Gerrymander in Midterm Game Changer

WATCH: F-18s disable Iranian tankers trying to run Strait of Hormuz blockade

Gorsuch says ideological divides on Supreme Court come down to ‘how you read law,’ not politics

Accused Murderer of Iryna Zarutska Found Incompetent to Stand Trial by Federal Examiners

Breaking: Dept. of War Releases Long-Awaited UFO Files – Photos from the Moon, Apollo Mission Audio Included

Tim Walz Minnesota forcing teachers to abide by ‘horribly disgusting,’ ‘crazy’ race standard, says lawmaker

GOP candidate Bianco’s two-word jab at Katie Porter draws gasps from California debate audience

Elites’ Knowledge Monopoly Is Wrecking America: Here’s How to Raise Kids Who Think for Themselves

Trump warns Iran what will happen if deal is not reached to end war and more top headlines

Is Cuba next on Trump’s regime-change agenda

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.