NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Watch: Another Talarico Clip Comes Back to Bite Him as He Characterizes Christians as ‘Causing Trouble’

Socialist Wisconsin governor candidate referred to America as ‘abundance of suffering,’ resurfaced post shows

HHS bureaucrats accused of ‘sabotaging’ RFK Jr’s efforts to expose Fauci records

Russia Releases American Military Veteran Who Was Taken Prisoner During Biden Administration

Replacement GOP nominee named after Rep Chuck Edwards drops re-election bid

US Marine veteran released from Russian prison after 1,666 days of detention

Michigan rescuers find family stranded for 3 days after tubing trip in dramatic video

Watch: Longtime Clinton Advisor Blasts Today’s Dems as Group of Lunatics, Who Are ‘Basically Illiterate and Uninformed’ from Watching MSNOW

NYC Homeowners Score Temporary Court Victory Over Mamdani’s New Tax

Alex Murdaugh lawyers allege ‘fabricated’ evidence was used to secure murder indictments

Trump-backed Darline Graham Nordone faces test in unpredictable South Carolina primary

Inside the Senate’s chaotic all-nighter that left Trump’s SAVE America Act on the shelf

Pentagon races to buy 10X more missiles as Iran war dwindles arsenal, threatens readiness for China aggression

GOP senators rally behind 9/11 families in push to ban Mamdani from anniversary ceremony: ‘He’s a disgrace’

The Medicare-for-all trade-offs socialists aren’t talking about, according to experts

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.