NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Pittsburgh doctor stabbed to death after intruder allegedly attacks him, wife as they slept: police

New Jersey Gov Mikie Sherrill calls on lieutenant governor to resign after sexual harassment investigation

FBI says source of its jobs portal breach still unknown as hackers allege employee data compromised

Michigan nurse accused of breaking bones and bruising premature infant at children’s hospital

Xi can’t escape protesters’ cries at deafening dinner demonstration

College Basketball Coach-Turned ESPN Personality Dies at 47

Watch: Xi Descends Into Laughter as Trump Shows off ‘President Autopen’ Picture in Place of Joe Biden’s Portrait

Talarico, Buoyed by Strong Gen Z Support, Leads Paxton Outside Margin of Error in New Poll

DOJ announces $25 million ANGEL grant program as it hosts violent crime victims

Unearthed clip exposes clash between El-Sayed and ex-GOP rival: ‘Muslims definitely hate you’

What’s on the menu for Trump’s state dinner with China’s Xi? One American staple is notably missing

Watch: ‘Oh, My God! Why Are We Saying “Free Palestine” Then?’ LGBT Activist Learns Muslims She’s Cheering for Hate Gays

Angel mom says blue state DAs are putting illegal immigrant criminals before public safety

Breaking: Man Wounded During Trump Assassination Attempt in Butler Dies 2 Years Later at 76

Netanyahu fires in all directions at UN, rebuking critics for ‘lies about my country’ as scores of delegates walk out

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.