NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: No suspects identified in disappearance of Nancy Guthrie as deadline passes

Civil rights groups issue Florida travel advisory for FIFA World Cup over immigration enforcement tactics

White House slams Democrat governor for urging public to track ICE agents with new video portal

Boston’s Wu orders release of ICE surveillance and bodycam footage, says fed government ‘hides behind masks’

Baltimore Mayor Plays the Race Card After Being Called Out on His $163,495 Taxpayer-Funded Vehicle

Kamala Harris Gives Clearest Indication Yet That She’s Running in 2028, Restarts 2024 Machine

Winning! Rental Prices Drop to 4-Year Low After Major Spike Under Biden

White House says murder rate plummeted to lowest level since 1900 under Trump administration

Breaking: FBI Arrests Man for Allegedly Targeting Nancy Guthrie’s Family with Demands

Los Angeles mayoral race upended by allegations Karen Bass altered fire report

Leavitt flips script on media for balking at Fulton election probe after years of promoting Russia claims

Anti-ICE ‘digital Minutemen’ use military-grade surveillance tactics against feds

Trump claims DNI Tulsi Gabbard was at Georgia election hub search because AG Pam Bondi wanted her there

Jill Biden’s ex-husband, now charged with murder, called wife ‘greatest thing in my life’

Arctic blast fuels scrutiny of Biden’s $8B electric bus push as watchdogs cite oversight failures

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.