NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Federal HR office pulls back curtain on sweeping NDA plan aimed at curbing government leaks

US and Iran reach ceasefire extension deal pending Trump’s final approval

Breaking: US and Iran Reportedly Reach Peace Agreement Pending Trump’s Approval

Husband’s phone GPS data prompts feds to search 25-foot-deep Bahamian waters for Lynette Hooker: sources

Judge hands Trump mail-ballot win for now as Democrats’ next move looms

Another One: Male LGBT Activist Arrested After Admitting Abusive Plan for 13-Year-Old Boy

1994 NBA Finals Clip Resurfaces Showing Trump at Knicks Game After Hochul Questioned His Fandom

US Military Prepared to Strike Cuba at Moment’s Notice: ‘When POTUS Says Go, We’re Ready’

Clarence Thomas puts Dems on clock as Alabama GOP emergency map bid stalled

Anti-ICE agitators throw wooden pallets, mattresses at federal agents during chaotic NJ detention center clash

Federal government’s landlord joins Vance fraud crackdown as White House widens hunt: ‘Critical force’

Al Green was a fighter for the Democrats. He lost his Texas primary anyway

Pentagon slashes NATO combat commitments as Trump pushes Europe to defend itself

US denies reports of evacuating US Embassy in Kyiv amid threats of Russian airstrikes

Ukrainian veterans are returning injured, broken, and angry. How can the government help them survive?

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.