NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Civil liberty advocates sue blue state over ‘show your papers’ gun law

Retired Austin cop tears into leftist city council for stripping police of key tools before shooting rampage

Trump Says He Canceled 11th-Hour Iran Bombing at Request of Saudi Leaders Amid New Peace Talks

Supreme Court Bluntly Swats Down Virginia Dems’ Power Grab

DHS, War Dept join probe into Singham network allegedly sowing discord in US

New York’s ‘wrong-headed’ defendant-friendly laws helped toss Mangione evidence: retired cop

‘Unelected mayor of DC’: Trump continues Washington makeover despite backlash

Los Angeles School District Pivots Away from Denying Equal Treatment to Student Bible Club

Blue-state tax burden fuels Americans fleeing to Republican-led southern states

Poland seeks answers after Pentagon scraps planned US armored brigade rotation

An unburdened Bill Cassidy doesn’t regret Trump impeachment vote after primary loss

Former Virginia assistant principal on trial after allegedly ignoring warnings before 6-year-old shot teacher

What the Data Actually Says About Abortion and Women’s Health

California’s New Congressional Maps Favoring Dems Could Be Struck Down by the Supreme Court: Report

Oct. 7 Exhibit Sign in London Removed After Police Warn It Could Attract Terrorists

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.