NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Watch: As Walls Close in, Schiff’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him in Resurfaced Pardon Video He Wishes Didn’t Exist

What to know about the Freedom 250 UFC fight on the White House lawn

Left-Wing Mob, Violent Threats Force Erika Kirk to Miss TPUSA Event with JD Vance

Trump reveals he has multi-pick SCOTUS plan ready as retirement speculation heats up

WATCH: Ex-NATO chief draws red line as Trump fumes alliance abandoned US during Iran war

Jeanine Pirro accused of trying to ‘circumvent’ Jerome Powell investigation through unprompted Fed ‘tour’

Millions tap Trump tax cuts this filing season as refunds top $3,400

Trump-Tillis tiff deepens as president says he ‘quit,’ concedes Fed fight could doom new chair confirmation

Man with Joker-inspired rifle fires gun, runs into traffic near Trump golf course, deputies say

Bahamian authorities plan to suspend search for missing American woman amid US Coast Guard criminal probe

Trump Says China Is ‘Very Happy’ With What He’s Doing With the Strait of Hormuz and Has Agreed to Comply

Sanity Is Returning: Teens Identifying as ‘Nonbinary’ Has Crashed 70 Percent in 2 Years Among CA 16-Year-Olds

Federal judge hands Biden’s home state a loss in battle of ICE access to labor data

Watch: Biden Drags College Administrator Up to Podium to Compare Him to Obama

Vance anti-fraud task force suspends 447 hospices in Los Angeles over more than $600M in suspected fraud

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.