NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump Predicts Supreme Court ‘Will Find a Way to Come to the Wrong Conclusion’ on Birthright Citizenship

Housekeeper expected to play key role in trial of wife accused of husband’s murder in wealthy ski town

How to Get a Birth Certificate for Dummies: A Guide for Democrats Who Oppose Secure Elections

Secret tapes sink shooter’s defense in Scott Spivey road rage killing

Angel Families praise Trump for immigration crackdown: ‘You are the man’

Trump halts Angel Families speech to check on woman in audience

Watch: CNN Host Goes Rogue on Air, Saying ‘Blue Cities Are Out of Control’ and Then Tearing Them Apart for 2 Minutes Straight

Watch: Media Melts Down After Kash Celebrates Team USA Win with a Chest Thump and Beer in His Hand – But He’s Not Backing Down

Kim Jong Un reelected as North Korean leader, teen daughter to serve as ‘missile chief’

Trump fires judge-picked US attorney as top DOJ official warns courts to stay in their lane

Reporter’s Notebook: Trump’s State of the Union becomes political boxing match as Democrats boycott

First antifa terrorism trial restarts following mistrial: What you need to know

Newsom’s office rebuffs ‘MAGA-manufactured outrage’ on his SAT score statement

Judge permanently blocks release of Trump classified documents report

JPMorgan Makes Humiliating Admission in Trump’s $5 Billion Debanking Lawsuit

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.