NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Older Drivers Could Be Forced to Take Road Test Again for License Renewal in Key Swing State

Watch: Punk Thinks He Can Steal from Tip Jar While Owner’s Back Is Turned – Has No Idea the Internet’s Watching Live and Nailed Him Immediately

One of America’s prettiest cities scrambles to reclaim storybook streets from homeless camps, drug dens

British Actor Who Mocked Christianity Receives Scorn for Mourning Rise of Islam

Child of Chinese illegal immigrants charged with planting explosive at US military base

Hegseth’s Prayer Service Targeted by 2 Lawsuits over So-Called ‘White Christian Power Structures’

Alcatraz could reopen as a ‘state-of-the-art secure prison’ under Trump’s $152M budget request

Artist fumes after tribute honoring slain Iryna Zarutska gets scrubbed amid woke blowback

Son of Republican megadonor throws hat in the ring for open at-large House seat in Wyoming

Jillian Michaels Shreds Dems Sowing Chaos with Fearmongering Over ICE at Airports

Even the Liberal Justices Are Baffled by Kentanji Brown Jackson’s Dissent in ‘Textbook’ Free Speech Case

Mike Rowe doubles down after blasting Kimmel’s ‘tone-deaf’ plumber jokes

Iran signals manpower crisis with soldiers as young as 12, volunteer recruitment campaign

Trump says ‘America needs God’ in Good Friday message touting ‘resurgence of religion’

Watch: DEI-Obsessed Sky News Reporter Claims Moon Landings by ‘All White Men’ Didn’t Represent Humanity

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.