NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Teen Athlete Goes Viral After Revealing She Was Sexually Harassed by Trans Athlete in Locker Room

Trump-aligned House holdouts accused of holding ‘life-saving’ veterans bill ‘hostage’ over SAVE America Act

CNN Needs Trauma Counselors – Paramount Looking to Actual Journalist Bari Weiss to Lead Both CNN and CBS News After Merger

Harvard astronomer tapped to lead White House UFO council says US government ‘baffled by what they are seeing’

House Democrat Ro Khanna says he was detained by armed Israeli settlers in West Bank

Trump-appointed judge permanently ends Proud Boys’ Jan 6 case, says Constitution left him no choice

Church in China Announces Massive Government Raid, Almost Three Dozen Christians Detained

Brazilian Couple Sentenced to Prison for Homeschooling Their Own Children

Europe’s demographic time bomb is killing its leaders’ popularity

WATCH: GOP senator warns ‘hammer-and-sickle’ politics will define Democrats’ 2028 primary

Appeals Court Blocks Part of ‘Stop WOKE Act’ in Florida, Allows Professors to Openly Teach Racism Against Whites

DNA technology leads to arrest in 1988 killing of Orlando woman after nearly four decades

Trump’s EPA chief pushes back on climate skeptics being labeled ‘science deniers’

Graham Platner Officially Goes Out How You’d Expect: ‘Free Palestine,’ Vulgar Message for ICE, No Accountability or Seriousness

Nicole Brown Simpson told former lover she’d ‘rather die’ than return to O.J. Simpson before her murder

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.