NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Detective arrested after allegedly pulling gun on fellow officer for microwaving fish at police station

Cold case of missing news anchor rocked by claim of confession in roadside meltdown: report

LATE BREAKING: ’60 Minutes’ Star Reporter Scott Pelley Fired After Mouthing Off to New Boss Chosen by Bari Weiss

WATCH: Rubio scorches claim Trump weighed finances in Iran decisions: ‘Not even for a millisecond’

Sex criminals, gang members abused child immigration program to enter US, DHS reveals

BREAKING VIDEO: UK Police Retreat as Brits Furious About Murder of Henry Nowak Take to Streets, Pelt Cops with Enormous Garbage Cans

Bessent clarifies threat against Bill Pulte: He said he was going to ‘kick his a**’

Aid group warns Ebola could have spread for three months before first cases were detected

Rubio grilled over Trump’s national security picks and foreign policy priorities: ‘It’s not funny, secretary’

Judge with intimate ties to Dem Party’s key Russia Hoax players behind latest anti-Trump decision

Watch Closely: Jill Biden Makes Telling Slip-Up During ‘Morning Joe’ Interview

Iran Significantly Escalates Fighting Overnight ‘In Response to a Series of US Military Attacks’

GOP leverages ICE funding package to make Trump’s controversial $2B fund ‘never exist’

Auburn University student disappears in Japan as parents join search: ‘In our own living hell’

Nancy Guthrie sheriff defends pace of investigation more than 4 months into search

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.