NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

‘Ghost ships’ ferrying illicit oil have sailed into Trump’s crosshairs

Doctor mysteriously found dead inside Dollar Tree freezer reportedly naked

Terrifying video shows out-of-control MTA bus plowing into cars in the Bronx, injuring 8

Pentagon launches full command investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly over ‘serious misconduct’ allegations

Comer gives Clintons last chance to testify in Epstein inquiry before contempt proceedings

Judge Hannah Dugan’s trial for illegal immigrant escape case begins with FBI agent on the stand

Ilhan Omar lashes out at ‘sick’ Republicans for investigating her alleged marriage to brother

Watch: Announcers Stunned as Irate LeBron James Gets Physical with Referee

DHS arrests ‘worst of the worst’ illegal migrants, including murderers and pedophiles, in weekend operation

Trump sues BBC for $10 billion over Jan. 6 speech edit

Erika Kirk shares update after private in-person meeting with Candace Owens

Police release new video of person of interest in Brown University shooting as manhunt resumes

Opinion: Trump’s Post on Rob Reiner’s Death Was a Massive Misstep, While the Vast Majority of MAGA Posts Got It Exactly Right

DC police accused of manipulating crime stats as federal probe finds thousands of misclassified cases

AOC’s luxury spending binge in Puerto Rico reignites questions about ‘socialist’ brand: ‘Peak hypocrisy’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.