NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump and Rubio weigh firing Kimberly Guilfoyle as misconduct and donor bailout allegations mount

Quiet part out loud: Anti-Israel mobs want one state called ‘Palestine,’ erasing Israel

Toddler stabbed in face, suspect previously deemed unfit for trial in attacks on 2 children: report

Breaking: Viral Recording Appears to Place Talarico at Ohio Psych Facility During Long Absence Despite Denial

Polls come under scrutiny as Democrats take the lead in midterm elections

Hurricane Isaias’ devastating aftermath comes into focus in striking images

Rescue expert warns FlyDubai hijacking attempt shows US, allies are ‘playing checkers’ against terror threat

‘Fraud’: Rubio Puts Woke So-Called Human Rights Group on Blast for Stunning US-Israel Hypocrisy

WATCH: CDC director discusses US government response to Russian plague concerns: ‘We are protected’

NYT Writer Claims ‘Combustible’ Sophie Cunningham Is ‘Just Too Much’ to Be Caitlin Clark’s Teammate

Chick-fil-A Takes Stand Against AI Trend McDonald’s Embraced, Holds the Line on ‘Human to Human’ Service

T-Mobile, AT&T Share Prices Plummet as Musk Makes Move to Shake Up the Industry

Trump announces immediate energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine

Disturbing Hunger-Killing AI ‘Yum Slop’ Trend Sweeps Through Restaurant Industry

Rising Hollywood Star Rejects Woke Trap, Refuses to Talk Politics: ‘My Calling Is Elsewhere’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.