NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Judge walks back ‘untenable’ order against Trump DOJ after tense DC golf course hearing

‘Changes the balance of leverage’: Zelensky tries to hold on as Trump pressures him to concede

Mahmoud Khalil asks Supreme Court to hear deportation case

Netflix Bloodbath Continues – Company Fires Film Chief

Report: Posts from Talarico’s Adoptive Dad Unearthed – Show ‘Best Man’ Dem Knows Joked About Christ and Degenerate Different Way to Kill Him

Media Learns Would-Be Shooter Is Trans, Immediately Starts Using Biological Pronouns to Hide Trans ID, Blaming Men Instead

Repeat offender accused of shooting National Guard member has lengthy history with the law, records show

Former OJ Simpson attorney, longtime friend both support possibility of accomplice in 1994 murders

Trump renews push to rename New Mexico ‘New America,’ touts higher home values and incomes

Eagles QB Jalen Hurts Pulled for Season, Doctors Find Multiple Blood Clots in His Lungs

Smithsonian screening dispute puts museum’s commitment to diverse views on trial: ‘Right kind of Black?’

Reporter’s Notebook: Senate sneaks in one last political play before voters have their say

France’s massive intel failure sparks resignation offers amid days of rioting

Federal voter fraud arrests intensify in California days after DOJ warning

Rick Jackson to skip Trump campaign rally in Georgia

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.