NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Tuberville defends post likening Mamdani to 9/11 attacks: ‘I just go by his rhetoric’

FBI rescues missing teen from Florida hotel after month-long hunt for accused kidnapper

Dem congressional candidate Bobby Pulido depicts lewd behavior in controversial music video for his song

AIPAC-backed Chicago Democrat loses primary despite outside spending blitz

Pritzker scores big: Stratton wins Illinois Senate primary in test of governor’s clout

Former congresswoman wins primary to take back former suburban Chicago seat

Democrat Patty García gains party’s nomination after controversial last-minute dropout by incumbent

WATCH: Tom Homan Exposes the Entire Dem Scheme With Illegals, Says They ‘Sold This Country Out for Future Political Power’

Two dead in Israel after Iranian missile attack near Tel Aviv

Pittsburgh police officers accused of ignoring ICE agents’ struggle with suspect

Upscale shopping district rocked by alleged antisemitic beating as lawyer, 2 others charged

Florida executes convict in 2008 rape, killing of woman, whose final call sparked 911 reforms

Bombshell Whistleblower Report: Mueller’s Anti-Trump Witch Hunters Drank on the Job, Tried to Doctor Records, Violated Security Rules

Bombshell: O’Keefe Videos Indisputable Proof of Huge CA Voter Fraud – So Big Newsom’s Office Instantly Called for Prosecution

Trump calls mail in voting corrupt as Senate begins debate on SAVE Act requiring voter ID

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.