NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

SPLC was once suspected of more crimes than current charges show

Three States Carry Out Executions on the Same Day in Rare Occurrence

Newly Elected Congressional Democrat Due to Face Felony Charge in Court

Netanyahu says US aid cut makes way for ‘mutual investment’ amid unclear plans for military cooperation

Ron Johnson presses to delay Senate GOP leadership elections: ‘Political malpractice’

Far-Left Media Outlet Abruptly Folds, Causing Conservatives to Dig Up Some of Its Most Insane Headlines

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what happens next on Capitol Hill

Trump’s move from Wiles to Miller signals major tactical shift for governing without Congress

Watch: NBA Players Can’t Contain Themselves When Singer Desecrates Anthem with LGBT Flag

Houston mayor bolts early from ICE cooperation after blue wave crashes in Texas

Reporter’s Notebook: A user’s manual to upcoming leadership elections in the House and Senate

Newsom Commutes Sentences of California’s 548 Prisoners on Death Row

Meghan Markle’s father arrested on federal child pornography charges

Allies fear relying on US after Starshield disruption demonstrated ‘kill switch’ threat

MICHAEL RUIZ: California prosecutors revolt after Newsom orders state’s worst killers off death row

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.