NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Woman busted in NYC rabbi syringe attack allegedly stabbed another Jewish man hours earlier: report

Ilhan Omar Accused of Leaking Info to Foreign Leaders in Somalia as Resurfaced Post Brings Evidence to Light

Airbnb Cracks Down on Hosts Treating Guests Like a Free Maid Service

How Is This Legal? Pollster Boosting Dem in Mississippi Admits It Fabricated Most Election Surveys

MAPPED: The states Trump and top Democrats are targeting before Election Day

Young Voters Who Helped Hand Trump White House Are Flocking Back to Dems for the Midterms: Poll

5 victims released from hospital after Florida A&M University shooting, 1 remains critical

Trump immigration win could strengthen admin’s hand in looming Supreme Court fight

‘MASH’ and ‘Top Gun’ Star Dead at 93

Is Our Constitution Adequate to Resist Sharia

Six Flags to add seat belts to roller coasters after Georgia rider’s death

Hochul faces revolt from unlikely New Yorkers as Democrats deliver scathing verdict on their party

Man admits beating dad to death in picturesque town decades ago after bragging to cops about ‘first body’

Socialism’s growing appeal meets an awkward reality check on college campus

Illinois County, Connecticut Cite Weapons You Never Heard of to Justify Their Gun Bans to SCOTUS

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.