NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Democratic socialist headed for $142K legislature salary begs for rent handout, deletes post after backlash

Multiple people killed in shooting at Idaho In-N-Out restaurant, suspect dead

ICE arrests illegal immigrant accused of rape, multiple sex crimes after release from Maryland jail

Father of 10-year-old boy breaks silence after viral beach rescue: ‘No way I could ever repay him’

Trump says he ‘disagrees 100%’ with U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro over Reflecting Pool case

Assisted living sent resident to doctor’s appointment after giving him 18 shots, 5 am beer: officials

Mamdani extends deadline for NYC homeowners to seek exemption from new pied-à-terre tax

DSA candidate pushes federal AI data center moratorium with Michigan early voting underway

Trump immigration agenda faces setback as Obama-appointed judge issues fresh TPS stay

Israeli president says Palestinian peace ‘requires’ acceptance of Israel in warning against Mamdani

New Christian Persecution Report Shows Most Dangerous Countries on Earth for Believing in Jesus

Why Gen Z Is Breaking This Longtime Workplace Taboo

Reporter’s Notebook: Why Fauci’s 111 Fifth Amendment pleas could end up before the courts

Trump blasts rogue GOP senators for blocking Blanche nomination, vows anti-weaponization bill fight

Trump Says AI Data Centers Pledge Will Make Power Bills ‘Actually Come Down’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.