NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

ICE arrests illegal immigrants convicted of child rape, sexual assault, drug trafficking

Former Connecticut police chief arrested for allegedly stealing $85K in public funds

CIA retracts, revises 19 past intelligence assessments deemed politically biased

Campus Radicals Newsletter: Teacher who lost job over 2-word post breaks silence, Chicago ‘racial segregation’

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Targeted attack’ vandalizes Trump-Kennedy Center outdoor ice rink, forces performance cancellation

Twisted: Little Girl Tells Mom She’s Afraid Trans Teacher Will Eat Her at Night, Then Mom Learns What He’s Telling Kindergartners at School

Crockett blasts ‘left’ for alleged skin darkening in ads as Texas Senate clash heats up

EPA scraps Biden coal restrictions as advocates say move will restore American dominance

Kavanaugh rips Supreme Court majority’s ‘illogical’ line on tariffs

Trump Accuses Supreme Court of Being Influenced by ‘Foreign Interests’ Following Tariff Ruling

Trump Slams Supreme Court for Not Addressing Tariff Refunds in Ruling: ‘Not Written by Smart People’

Omar calls GOP probe into husband’s $30M business surge a ‘political stunt’ as records deadline passes

President Trump Announces ‘Different Direction’ on Tariffs Following SCOTUS Decision, And Might Charge Countries More Than Before

Sanctuary City Detroit to Fire Cops After They Cooperated with ICE – DHS Responds

Fox News Poll: Trump’s tariffs faced broad disapproval even before Supreme Court ruling

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.