NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump plays nuclear poker with Kim Jong Un — but who holds the cards?

Fetterman aligns with Trump on AI push, warns China benefits from US ‘overreaction’

Bear crashes couple’s anniversary getaway, rummages through Tennessee tea shop before jumping on counter

Police make arrest after gunfire during California high school football game leaves 1 dead

Connecticut police officers shot, suspect killed after attempted arrest sparks hectic chase

‘Will Come Back to Bite You’: Top Official Asked Fauci for Vaccine Side Effect Study – Email

Breaking: Judge Slaps Down Karmelo Anthony’s Bid for New Trial

Nancy Kassebaum Baker, trailblazing GOP senator who broke barriers for women in Congress, dead at 94

Judge denies Karmelo Anthony new-trial bid after ex-lawyers detail dispute that kept him from testifying

Judge denies Karmelo Anthony’s bid for new trial after ex-lawyers detail dispute that kept him from testifying

Federal judge blasts Rubio’s 75-country visa freeze as ‘Orwellian,’ strikes down policy

Nashville hospital medication error leaves at least 1 patient paralyzed after routine surgery, 3 others hurt

Kalshi and prediction markets experience explosive growth, but also new legal challenges

FBI asked ‘Sammy the Bull’ if ex-Gambino mob prosecutor Comey knew meaning of ’86’: court filing

The Will of 100: Trump’s SAVE America Act sidelined after Senate unanimously agreed to August exit

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.