NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Coercion Is the Abortion Debate We Aren’t Having

Kentucky governor calls on McConnell to prove he is fit to serve or resign: ‘Address the people’

Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband details pill use as expert says evidence could shape murder trial

BTK killer Dennis Rader’s daughter Kerri Rawson hit with domestic violence injunction: report

Murdered 9-year-old begged not to go on trip with dad months before he allegedly killed her, mom testifies

Thune soft-pedals adding Trump’s request for debt limit curveball to GOP budget bill

Breaking: Iran Launches Missiles at US Base in Surprise Attack – US Forces Downed Every Single One

New Maine law limits police cooperation with federal immigration officials

GOP governor survives challenge from Bitcoin evangelist in gubernatorial runoff

A 16-Year-Old Lifeguard’s ‘Heroic’ Rescue Earns Him a Trip to the White House After Trump Sees Footage

Daughter of late House Dem forced into runoff after falling short in special election

Mamdani Slammed for ‘Reckless and Foolish’ Doxxing of Thousands of Wealthy New Yorkers

Charlie Kirk murder case as ‘straight-forward’ as it gets, prosecutors argue as case nears trial decision

White House Issues Update After High-Stakes Meetings with Netanyahu and Zelenskyy

WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Dominates Field, Passes Up JD Vance

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.