NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Afghan watchdog: US taxpayer-funded weapons left behind have formed ‘core of the Taliban security apparatus’

Could This Be the End? Trump Moves to End Birthright Citizenship for Good, SCOTUS Agrees to Hear the Case

Victor Davis Hanson: Consequences Await Tim Walz After Somali Fraud Scandal

How the Feds Unmasked, Caught Jan. 6 Pipe Bomb Suspect

Tim Walz Whines to Reporters That People Are Calling Him the ‘R-Word’ – And It’s Trump’s Fault

911 calls from deadly Texas Hill Country flood reveal heartbreaking pleas

High-brow New Jersey suburb’s high school launches Socialist Club with Karl Marx imagery

Hollywood star endorses Republican for California governor after ‘devastating’ Newsom admin

Walz ‘derelict leadership’ to blame in $1B fraud scandal with ‘haunting reminds of Watergate’: GOP challenger

How one of the biggest local TV mergers ever could blow a hole in Trump’s affordability push

‘Another D-Day’: Biden once urged ‘international strike force’ on narco-terrorists as Dems now blast Trump

Marjorie Taylor Greene plays hooky with House resignation in sight

Hard to Read: Lesbian Couple Facing 1st Degree Murder Charge After Foster Son Found Dying in Horrific State – Their Nickname for Him Was Evil

Jan. 6 bomb suspect’s arrest exposes holes in FBI’s story about cellphone data

Chick-Fil-A Under Fire After Betraying Loyal Customers with Shockingly Woke Statement

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.