NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Trump says Greenland’s defense is ‘two dog sleds’ as he pushes for US acquisition of territory

Wild video shows federal agents detaining 2 men at Minnesota gas station as agitators gather

Trump says Iran ‘starting to’ cross US red lines as protesters die in government crackdown

Deadly avalanche claims 2 snowmobilers in Washington state backcountry, 2 rescued

Breaking: Truck Plows Through Anti-Iranian Regime Protest in Los Angeles

Trump’s motorcade route adjusted after Secret Service finds ‘suspicious object’ at Palm Beach airport

Jacob Frey tells critics ‘sorry I offended their delicate ears’ after ICE f-bomb controversy

Street takeovers and traffic control by agitators in Minnesota cross legal lines, retired detective says

Suspect arrested after fire burns oldest Mississippi synagogue

US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report shared by Leavitt claims

Critical clue led police to suspect Chicago doctor in deaths of Ohio dentist, wife

LA Residents Still Battling Toxic Hazards in the Aftermath of Last January’s Devastating Wildfires

DHS deploying hundreds more federal agents to Minneapolis, Noem announces

Chinese Communist Party Rounds Up Members of Underground Christian Church in Crackdown

Repeat Offender Charged with Assaulting, Robbing Pregnant Woman While on Blue City’s ‘Electronic Monitoring’

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.