NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Walz proposes $10M business relief package as Republicans cry ‘new avenue for fraud’ in Minnesota

Shooting at South Carolina State University leaves two dead

Puerto Rico governor signs law recognizing unborn babies as human beings

Over 700 arrested amid major gang and drug crackdown in Louisiana

Sanctuary policies let alleged child predator roam free until DHS made Portland, Oregon, airport arrest

Over 1.5 million illegal aliens with deportation orders in US, ICE director reveals

Arizona sheriff blocking FBI from key evidence in escalating Guthrie case: source

Obama Judge Just Knowingly Released 4 Violent Illegals – 1 Ethiopian Pedophile and 3 Cuban Murderers, According to ICE – Onto US Streets

Canadian Police Double Down on Respecting Trans Killer’s Gender Identity, Will Use Preferred Pronouns

Newsom stop in key presidential primary state sparks more 2028 speculation

Noem slams Dems blocking DHS funding bill citing TSA, FEMA, Coast Guard: ‘I hope they come to their senses’

FBI reveals new evidence, including backpack details, in Nancy Guthrie disappearance, doubles reward to $100K

‘Proudly Fixing This Stupid Feature’: Obama-Era Regulation Gets Axed by Trump Admin

College Football Star Charged with Heinous Crime Just Days After Engagement Goes Public

Tim Walz demands federal government ‘pay for what they broke’ after Homan announces Minnesota drawdown

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.