NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Iran fails to strike deal with US as deadline passes and Trump calls for ‘white flag of surrender’

[4] Massachusetts Mayor Charged in Alleged $1.5 Million Pandemic-Era Loan Fraud And Money Laundering Scheme

Hunter’s Perfect Shot Provides Not Just Community Service But Massive Load of Barbecue

Trump endorses replacement GOP nominee Jennifer Balkcom after Chuck Edwards ends re-election bid

A Democrat’s apology hasn’t calmed the transgender rights fight raging in Massachusetts Senate primary

Socialist insurgency storms Trump’s backyard, with pro-Israel Democrats in crosshairs

Troy Jackson, now pushing affordability message, voted to raise taxes in Maine

Appeals court rules Trump admin unlawfully appointed Nevada’s top federal prosecutor

DOJ opens probe into prestigious college over alleged discrimination favoring minority students

Trump DOJ accuses Obama judge of ‘Monday-morning quarterbacking’ in bid to revive Abrego Garcia case

Virginia man acquitted by insanity in killing flees US during 48-hour mental hospital pass

Man calls 911 after girlfriend found dead in motel, police allegedly uncover disturbing videos on his phone

Newly Released COVID Email Shows FDA Head Warning Fauci of Vax Side Effects, Then Eerie 4-Word Response from the Disgraced COVID Chief

Illegal immigrant learns fate after using stolen identity to vote in US elections for decades

Penn State cocaine bust nets 14 arrests over alleged pledge coke-cutting ‘indoctrination’ rituals

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.