NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Sotomayor lets loose on conservative Supreme Court with revealing wish: ‘Crazy things’

Mamdani makes behind-the-scenes moves to shape 2028 Democratic presidential race

Prominent Christian Apologist Wes Huff Asks for Prayer After His 3-Year-Old Daughter Is Rushed to the Hospital

Rapist Russell Brand Declared to be ‘Dead Man Walking’ in Hellish UK Prison, Ex-Inmate Says He’ll Be ‘a Marked Man’

UN postpones US human rights review after boycott

Explosive House report exposes failures it says allowed Epstein’s abuse to continue for years

GOP lawmaker ousts fellow Republican in gerrymandered California district

When the Pharmacies Are Empty and the Clinic Is Closed, Here’s the Kit Americans Keep Ready

Texas’ Democrat governor-elect has vowed to impose ‘emergency’ day-one policy and more top headlines

‘SNL’ writer’s sister vanished — now her boyfriend and rival face charges in deadly love triangle

Trump defends Pentagon chief as Massie targets him: ‘Hegseth should be praised, not impeached’

Reporter’s Notebook: House leadership up for grabs as GOP reckons with devastating losses

Somali daycare CEO tied to fraud scandal wins Minnesota House seat

Thune forges ahead with leadership elections despite calls for post-midterm reckoning

Trump calls on Senate to confirm remaining 25 judges amid Arkansas senator friction

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.