NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Newsom’s California rail project now expected to cost $126B, official admits, with still no tracks laid

Children of Illegal Aliens Linked to Attempted Bombing at U.S. Air Force Base

Martinez: Why President Trump’s War On Fraud Exposes National Scandal

Behind ‘No Kings’ St. Paul protest: $250K production machine equal to a Def Leppard concert

GOP races to pass ICE, Border Patrol funding bill as priorities pile up, divisions emerge

Why the Strait of Hormuz matters as Trump issues fresh ultimatum to Iran

Pair of Democrat lawmakers slam ‘blockade of fuel’ to Cuba, ‘economic bombing’ after visit to island

New Hampshire suspect who shot officer and triggered massive manhunt killed in police gunfight

Savannah Guthrie’s Easter message reveals anguish as mom missing 63 days

Greene says Trump isn’t Christian in slamming Easter threat to reopen Strait of Hormuz

CNN Analyst Breaks Down the Numbers for Dems, Reveals Their Own Voters Can’t Stand Them

Blue States Scrambling to Circumvent SCOTUS Ruling, Save Censorship of Gender Counseling

Billboard trolling Dale Warner goes viral after his murder conviction in wife Dee’s case

Watch: Inept Texas Judge Blasted After Camera Catches Him Cursing Kind Computer Tech – Now His Nasty Emails Demanding Respect Have Leaked, Too

One of a Kind Video: Kid Rock Uses Apache Hovering Behind His House to Torment Gavin Newsom

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.