NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Melania Trump secures $7.2M for foster care scholarships at LSU ahead of Alabama showdown

DeSantis Slams Vivek Ramaswamy’s Disastrous Ohio Campaign: ‘How Bad Did They Beat Vivek? Like a Drum!’

DeSantis Gives Another Powerful Rebuke of GOP’s Strategy: ‘Screaming Socialism’ Doesn’t Work

Trump orders DOJ probe into Democrats over alleged threats against admin officials

Biden-appointed judge probes whether ICE skirted judge’s release orders in Colorado cases

Salon Signs Off: The Truth Outlasts the Smear

Newsom’s death-row commutations spark DA revolt as prosecutors warn of legal fight

Turning Point USA event at University of New Mexico ends with two arrests and a string of charges

The Left’s Joe Rogan Can’t Stop Laughing at Twisted Charlie Kirk Execution Fantasy

Slew of Arrests For Newly Elected Democrats Across the Country, Some Could Face Years in Jail

White House Slammed for Tone-Deaf Post About ‘Triumphal Arch’ Following Midterm Bloodbath

9 mystery fingerprints from OJ Simpson murder case could hold new clues more than 30 years later

Republican state lawmakers reported Omar to the IRS in 2019

California prosecutors slam Newsom’s death row commutations, accuse governor of putting ‘politics over people’

Far Worse Than Previously Reported: Big Tech’s Ticking Time Bomb Is a Massive Financial Exposure Tied to AI

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.