Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Lindsay Clancy Fangirls Push Child Killer’s GoFundMe Total to Staggering $1.1M Following Mistrial
Taxpayers Footed the Bill for Nearly $500M in Food Stamps at California Fast Food Joints
Judge allows ‘homewrecker’ lawsuit against former Sen Kyrsten Sinema to move forward
Detransitioner takes malpractice fight to appeals court after North Carolina law change
Trump weighs in on Lindsay Clancy murder trial dubbed ‘kangaroo court’ by GOP leaders
Here Comes the Bride – In Water Nearly Up to Her Waist
Arizona voter-law fight reaches SCOTUS as election groups warn ‘absurd’ consequence could ensue
Dunkin’ Opened a Drive-Thru Lane Just for Dogs — And It Was Pure Joy
Well-connected Dem operative learns fate after FBI busts him in child sex abuse sting
California McDonald’s Shootout Turns Deadly as Police Arrive: Turns Out the Perpetrator Was an Employee
How Stepdad Firefighter Learned of 911 Call in Most Painful Way Possible
Ex-Fetterman staffers promise more damaging details after blistering report: ‘Tip of the iceberg’
NJ mayor demands sanctuary policy rollback after baby killed in crash allegedly involving illegal immigrant
Patrick Clancy speaks out after hung jury in Lindsay Clancy case, addresses prospect of another trial
‘Black widow’ allegedly attempted to murder romantic partner, 69, she met online
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
