Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Watch: Jasmine Crockett Claims She’s One of the Most ‘Powerful’ People in the Country, Slams Those Not ‘On the Same Level’
No Good Deeds Go Unpunished By Our European ‘Allies’ and Their Total Inaction
Vance, Cruz, head to Iowa on 2026 missions as 2028 GOP race to succeed Trump heats up
Suspect arrested for allegedly running meth lab at Michigan State University’s largest academic building
Two Kentucky bank employees shot and killed during robbery, police hunting suspect
Dominican migrant with deportation order, wanted for murder in home country freed by Biden-appointed judge
Wyoming official faces backlash after posting ‘hang bad judges’ comment on abortion ruling
Doctor and son accused of running dangerous side-business scheme in New York
DOJ sues New Jersey over laws giving illegal aliens in-state tuition, says citizens treated as ‘second-class’
Hawley champions GUARD Act as heartbroken families say AI chatbots allegedly pushed teens to self-harm
Democratic Congressman Suggests Execution for Pete Hegseth
GOP lawmakers seek to defund HBCU after it canceled Republican’s commencement speech
DOJ Axes a Slew of Gun-Control Regulations in ‘Historic’ Day for the 2nd Amendment
Watch: Johnny Carson’s Reaction to Reagan Shooting Goes Viral After Trump Targeted
MN lawmakers unload on Walz’s ‘legacy’ after he touts fraud record in final annual address: ‘Ridiculous’
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
