Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Soros prosecutor in danger of being removed after grieving mom’s desperate alarm: ‘Can’t believe this’
Judge sentences Feeding Our Future fraudsters who faked running child nutrition site
Top 10 fugitive captured after Georgia manhunt as police probe woman’s mysterious death
Bryan Kohberger’s 2027 hearing is not guaranteed as Idaho seeks quick dismissal
Thousands missing from dozens of countries after Nepal flooding
Iran and Oman come to agreement to open Strait of Hormuz, but await US buy-in
Newsom: ‘I Didn’t Even Know’ Home Had 5,000-Bottle Wine Cellar
Charles Barkley Takes Major Stand With Sophie Cunningham, Enes Kanter on Trans Players – ‘It’s in the Title: WNBA’
Democrats’ redistricting push in blue state hits legal snag
Dolly Parton Was Packing Heat, Recounted Fending Off Harasser with Gun in Resurfaced Clip
Meet the Literally Godless ‘Pro-Extinctionists’ Who Want to Exterminate Human Life Everywhere
Iowa Dem gubernatorial candidate says he would not want Biden or Harris to campaign for him
Spanberger AG draws fire over two-front fight against Trump enforcement agenda
Gender equity, DEI, climate action: How the Smithsonian’s woke push ‘infiltrated’ America’s most beloved Zoo
Man accused of using fake Chief Justice Roberts signature to get own criminal case dismissed
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
