Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
At least 27 dead in Bangkok after fire breaks out at bar: Officials
Two teen suspects held after 5 family members killed in ‘targeted mass shooting’
EMS dispatch audio captures emergency response before Lindsey Graham death announcement
Medical examiner releases preliminary findings in Lindsey Graham’s death as death certificate remains pending
Mitch McConnell breaks silence on mystery hospitalization after Graham’s death
From ‘disgrace’ to ‘family’: Trump’s remarkable journey with Lindsey Graham
Some Somali Kids Allegedly Spent Their July 4 Weekend Shooting People
Dr. Phil Speaks Out Against Anti-Christian Persecution
Here’s Why Judge Blocked Blue State’s Gun Ban
Father, son killed in plane crash on way home from baseball game
Graham’s death ignites GOP scramble for Senate seat as Trump hints he already has a favorite
Huckabee: Banner at Supreme Leader’s Funeral Exposes the Real Iran
Trump Spoke to Lindsay Graham Shortly Before His Death, Offers Glowing Praise for Late Republican
Report: Hours After Lindsay Graham’s Death, Nancy Mace Is Eyeing His Senate Seat
Trial of Man Accused of Lighting Infamous Los Angeles Palisades Fire Ends Inconclusively
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
