Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
House Republicans defend ICE agent in fatal shooting, say use of force was justified
California leads multistate lawsuit against Trump over child care funding freeze
Obama Presidential Center job listings push ‘anti-racism’ pledge ahead of opening
Trump Admin Considers Sending Large Payments to Every Greenland Resident in Bid to Acquire the Island: Report
First Hilton, Then Marriot, Now McDonald’s: Companies Rush to Embrace ICE as Conservative Pressure Campaign Crushes Woke Workers
‘Tip of the iceberg’: Senate Republicans press Gov Walz over Minnesota fraud scandal
Democratic socialist Mamdani ally mounts bid for US House of Representatives
Ohio dentist murders: Alley video, no forced entry fuel insider fears, experts say
Renee Nicole Good part of ‘ICE Watch’ group, DHS sources say
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
