Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
California Rep. Darrell Issa to retire, endorses Jim Desmond to succeed him
Trump says US ‘doing very well’ in Iran nearly 1 week into joint action against Tehran
NYC Reportedly Put Aside $400M for Dozens of ‘Ghost’ Schools that Never Opened
Emergency landing ends in tragedy as plane crashes on New Mexico golf course
US military carries out targeted strike on alleged narco-terrorist network in Ecuador
Trump Confirms He Will Withhold Endorsing Cornyn Until SAVE Act is On His Desk – He Also Makes Another Demand
Man accused of Iran-backed Trump assassination plot compared his plan to Butler shooting: FBI
ICE Arrests Illegal Alien in Idaho for Allegedly Trafficking Children Into State as Laborers
Spanberger lashes out at Pentagon after Hegseth pulls colleges’ support over woke ‘ideologies’
Illegal Alien Charged With Fraudulently Voting in Crucial Swing State During 2024 Election
Florida Bar denies investigation into ex-US Attorney Lindsey Halligan
US signals readiness to escort tankers through Hormuz as traffic thins but no mission launched
FLASHBACK: Dem Senate nominee called illegal aliens ‘constituents,’ gave advice on evading ICE
Hegseth Honors Americans Killed in Action as Operation Epic Fury Enters Second Week: ‘Their Deaths Will Not Be in Vain’
Tourist’s bird-brained Vegas stunt with flamingo lands him behind bars on felony charges
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
