Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what to expect on DHS funding when the Senate meets Monday
Bank of America to Pay $72.5M Settlement Over Epstein Lawsuit
Huckabee says Israeli police blocking Palm Sunday service is an ‘overreach’
Vacation rental near Yosemite allegedly used to secretly record guests, 4,000 illegal files found
Tiger Woods’ Friends Admit He ‘Drives Like a Bat Out of Hell Very Often’
How This Archaeological Find Shows the Ancient Link Between Israel and Persia
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
Daughter of Air Canada flight attendant ejected from crash provides update, details mother’s injuries
New pro-AI group backed by Trump allies plans $100M midterm spending push
Canadian Leaders Terrified ICE Will Deport People… From Canada
CCP-Tied Activists in the Midwest Desperately Fight to Keep Chinese Land Grabs Alive Near US Bases
Jet fuel spikes as airlines warn supplies could run dry within weeks
TSA Done for? Ex-Obama DHS Chief Says Shutdown Woes Could ‘Break the Back’ of TSA
Sen Mazie Hirono trolled for admitting Trump not ‘a king,’ and ‘never has been’
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
