Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Trump’s Top 10 Campaign Promises Fulfilled in First Year
Texas antifa terrorism case: Confessions mount as Trump DOJ clinches more convictions
Walz allies led state agencies that oversaw massive alleged Somali daycare fraud
Eric Adams says Biden DOJ used ‘lawfare’ against him, compares treatment to Trump
State officials and daycare manager push back on viral video fraud allegations in Minnesota
Unearthed surveillance exposes how parents were allegedly involved in Minnesota’s daycare fraud scheme
Nashville shooter Audrey Hale allegedly used federal student aid to buy guns for school attack
Trucker slapped with charges in fatal driving incident previously immigrated to US illegally: source
Judge Orders Release of Sealed Tyler Robinson Records
Dems Told Us Somalis Are Massive Contributors to Minnesota. Stats Prove That’s a Lie of Profound Proportions
Breaking: DOJ Announces 98 Total Arrests in Minnesota Fraud Case – 85 of ‘Somali Descent’
Zelenskyy says peace deal is close after Trump meeting but territory remains sticking point
DHS Conducting ‘Massive’ Operation in Minneapolis After Explosive Day Care Fraud Allegations
Texas man charged with attempting to provide material support to ISIS in federal terrorism case
Lapsed Epstein deadline underscores challenge of reviewing troves of files in 30 days
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
