Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Republicans rush to green light White House ballroom following third Trump assassination scare
Supreme Court hands GOP a redistricting win by striking down lower court block on Texas map
‘One-Door’ Welfare Policy Is a One-Way Street to Welfare Fraud
White House Correspondents’ Dinner Attendees Pinpoint Troubling Security Lapse: ‘We Are Lucky This Wasn’t Far Worse’
DNC vice chair attacks Democratic Sen. John Fetterman: ‘You’re a mess’
DOJ cites White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting in push to drop lawsuit against ballroom
North Dakota state rep, pilot killed in plane crash
What we know about the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting suspect and more top headlines
Fox News Reporter Describes Experiencing Chaos on Stage During Trump Assassination Attempt
Another Eight Nigerian Christians Killed in Coordinated Attacks
Mamdani’s racial equity plan a hidden ‘moving the goalposts’ ploy to justify massive gov expansion: expert
ACLU, NAACP accused of trying to ‘sabotage’ US tourism with ‘fearmongering’ campaign
US military conducts strike on another boat carrying alleged narco-traffickers, killing 3
New York woman convicted for throwing dynamite at boyfriend, blowing off his hand as he tried to get rid of it
Obama says motive unclear despite manifesto outlining alleged targets in WHCD shooting
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
