Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
Pittsburgh mayoral primary sees major upset as ‘old guard’ candidate defeats progressive incumbent Ed Gainey
Soros-backed Philadelphia DA survives primary challenge, but potential GOP wrinkle ahead
Fifth escaped inmate from New Orleans jail recaptured after days on the run
Man who set beloved Texas grandma on fire executed 13 years after her murder
The Golden Dome Is Going Up, And Guess Who Wants In on It
George Wendt, Beloved ‘Cheers’ Star Dead at 76 on Remarkable Unlikely Anniversary
CPAC warns: Backing Trump ‘is a line in the sand’
Trump, Hegseth announce ‘Golden Dome,’ a ‘game changer’ to protect American homeland
Top Director Tries to Mock Trump at Film Festival, Accidentally Reveals He’s Totally Clueless About Tariffs
Trump Backs Charges Against Congresswoman After Chaos At ICE Facility: ‘She Was Out of Control’
Senate GOP vows vote to end Biden EPA waiver granted to push drivers to EV cars
Republican governors say they ‘stand united’ in support of Trump’s ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’
Marco Rubio Has Perfect Response When Dem Senator Says ‘I Regret Voting for You for Secretary of State’
Top IRS division appears packed with anti-Trump officials
Anti-ICE group funded by CCP-linked sources
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
