NY prosecutors reveal ‘another crime’ Trump allegedly tried to conceal with falsified business records

New York prosecutors on Tuesday revealed "the other crime" they claim former President Trump was allegedly trying to conceal when he allegedly falsified his business records.

New York prosecutors on Tuesday revealed the other crime they allege that former President Trump was trying to conceal when he allegedly falsified his business records.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. For prosecutors to secure a criminal conviction, they must convince the jury that Trump committed the crime of falsifying business records in “furtherance of another crime.”


Trump pleaded not guilty to all 34 counts.

New York prosecutor Joshua Steinglass on Tuesday said the other crime was a violation of a New York law called “conspiracy to promote or prevent election.”

Prosecutors will try to prove that the alleged conspiracy was to conceal a conspiracy to unlawfully promote his candidacy.

“Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,” New York Law 17-152 reads. 

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said during his opening argument on Monday the case against Trump “is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up.” 

Colangelo argued that months after Trump announced his candidacy for president in June 2015, he invited former CEO of American Media Inc. (AMI) David Pecker to Trump Tower for a meeting. His then-attorney and alleged “fixer” Michael Cohen was also at the meeting. AMI owned the National Inquirer.

See also  A political realignment in PA: Despite recent Dem wins, the GOP is gaining momentum, analysts say

“Those three men formed a conspiracy to influence the election,” Colangelo argued.

Colangelo alleged Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 to “silence” her and make sure the public did not learn of an alleged sexual encounter with Trump. Colangelo said that after the election Trump reimbursed Cohen through a series of monthly checks from his businesses but disguised those transactions as payments for legal services.

Colangelo alleged that Pecker, Cohen and Trump “conspired to influence the 2016 presidential election,” and said Pecker would gather harmful information and prevent it from going public. Colangelo alleged he only published flattering stories about Trump and negative stories about opponents. 

The prosecutor said the men used a practice called “catch & kill,” saying they bought damaging information, had the seller of that information sign a nondisclosure agreement, and then blocked the information from being published.

Colangelo said the practice was used three times. One was to block a story that a former Trump Tower doorman was trying to sell about an alleged out-of-wedlock child. Colangelo said the payment was $30,000. The doorman’s story was eventually proven to be untrue.


The next payment was to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who claimed a romantic and sexual relationship with Trump. Colangelo alleged that Cohen asked AMI to buy the story. Colangelo said AMI paid McDougal $150,000 in exchange for “unlimited life rights” to her story.

See also  Trump-Backed Candidate Calls Own Supporters 'Crazies' for Believing the Election was Stolen: Texts

Colangelo also alleged there was a $130,000 payment made to Daniels.

He further alleged that when it came time to pay Cohen back, Trump “didn’t negotiate the price down; he doubled it.” Colangelo said that his “willingness to do this shows the importance of hiding the payments” and alleged “overall election conspiracy.” 

But Trump defense attorney Todd Blanche rejected the prosecution’s argument, saying, “President Trump is innocent.”

“None of this was a crime,” Blanche said. “People say that Trump is trying to cover up payments – think … President Trump did not pay Cohen back $130,000. He paid Cohen $420,000.”

He added, “Would a frugal businessman repay a $130,000 debt to the tune of $420,000?”

Blanche said the money “was not a payback” and that Trump, in 2017 after the election, was paying legal fees.

He added, “I have a spoiler alert: There is nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. It’s called democracy. They put something sinister on it.”


Blanche argued that Cohen paying Daniels “was not illegal” and entering into a nondisclosure agreement was also not illegal, saying companies “do that all the time.”

“There is nothing illegal about it,” Blanche said, arguing that Daniels was attempting to try to embarrass Trump with “all sorts of allegations” that could be “damaging to him and damaging to his family.”

See also  Nathan Wade's estranged wife says he’s failed to pay spousal support since resigning from Fani Willis' office

“Trump fought back to protect his family, reputation, brand,” Blanche said. “And that is not a crime.”

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter

→ What are your thoughts? ←
Scroll down to leave a comment:

Discover more from ConservativeModern.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading