It seems that Hillary Clinton may have unknowingly played a large role in the racketeering charges that Nxivm founder Keith Raniere is currently facing in court.
Court documents filed by the US Attorney’s office prior to the trail detail how multiple members of he cult – including all five of the defendants who were indicted in the case – exceeded the legal limit for campaign donations when giving money to Clinton’s first campaign for president.
That motion, which sought to have evidence admitted to the case to support the racketeering allegations against the defendants, said that the funds were donated in hope of gaining influence over Clinton.
This plan hit an unexpected snag however when Clinton failed to even make it past the primary, with the former senator’s momentum halted by the man who would go on to win the presidency, Barack Obama.
‘Witness testimony, corroborated by documentary evidence, will demonstrate that at least 14 members of the Nxivm community, including at least five defendants and co-conspirators, made the maximum campaign donation to a primary campaign with the understanding that they would be reimbursed by Bronfman or Nancy Salzman,’ reads the filing.
‘At the suggestion of a political operative, who has since pleaded guilty to an unrelated New York state bribery charge also involving campaign contributions, the contributions were “bundled” and presented to the candidate at a fundraising event attended by conspirators, including Nancy Salzman.’
Trump responds to reports FDA chief Mark Makary could be fired: ‘Know nothing about it’
Trump Hikes Tariffs on Key European Import to Encourage US Industry
Los Angeles Drivers Facing $100 Fill-Ups As Gas Prices Soar
US Agency Releases Startling Report on Anti-Christian Persecution in Major Islamic Country
Inside the US military playbook to cripple Iran if nuclear talks collapse
Spain readies for evacuations as a hantavirus-hit cruise ship heads for the Canary Islands
California abortion pill suppliers plot workarounds ahead of Supreme Court mifepristone decision
Accused street takeover mastermind charged after wild stunts, machine gun chaos: police
Catfish Farmers, Undertakers, Miners Celebrate Major Trump Admin EPA Deregulation
Connecticut pro-Second Amendment group sounds alarm on Glock-style ban, fear Democrats will go even further
California professor accused of killing pro-Israel protester will ‘likely’ avoid lengthy prison sentence
Watch As Democrat Xavier Becerra Calls Migrant Kids Lost Under His Watch MAGA Talking Point
LGBTQ ‘lavender graduations’ set to take place at major Christian colleges, including one with a drag show
Fact Check: No, Kash Patel Is Not Having Custom Bourbon Made on the FBI’s Dime
Regulators allow Obama-era solar plant to kill thousands of birds annually, investigation finds
The document goes on to state: ‘A cooperating witness who attended the event will testify that the defendants and their co-conspirators made the contributions in hopes of obtaining political influence to advance their own agenda, including targeting perceived enemies of Raniere.’
Clinton was just one of the many Democratic candidates who Nxivm members donated too, with DailyMail.com learning that the list also included Al Franken, Claire McKaskill, Ken Salazar and Tammy Duckworth.
Records obtained by DailyMail.com show that the group gave $10,000 to the Democratic Committee of South Carolina as well at a time when Hillary needed a crucial win in the primary.
It is a damning allegation, but one that may not come up now that only Raniere is standing trial, with his co-defendants all entering guilty pleas in exchange for deals with prosecutors.
‘Specifically, the bundled campaign contributions were part of an attempt to curry favor with a presidential nominee to advance the goals of the defendants and co-conspirators, including by obtaining indictments against enemies and gaining advantages in litigation,’ stated the US Attorney’s office in the filing.
‘The evidence of the conduit contributions also demonstrates the relatedness of the predicate acts, because it demonstrates the attitude of defendants and co-conspirators that they must “cheat to win” to fight the conspiracy they believed was operating against them.
Story cited here.
