First Amendment

NRA sues San Francisco for declaring it a domestic terrorist organization

The National Rifle Association is suing the city and county of San Francisco and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for declaring it a domestic terrorist organization earlier this month through a resolution passed by the board.

In the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, the NRA claims that SF and the Board of Supervisors “adopted a new government policy: blacklist anyone linked to the NRA.” They are claiming that the resolution violates the organization’s first and fourteenth amendment rights.

The NRA called the resolution “obviously unconstitutional” before comparing it moves by the state of New York and city of Los Angeles they said were similar to SF’s.


Florida judge rips into mom accused of leaving 4 children at home to go on 3-day cruise
Ole Miss students’ toxicology reports completed, official says
Watch: Desperate Jake Tapper Begs Ambassador to Plead His Case to Trump and Let CNN Back Into Press Pool, Gets Rejected Live on Air
Police: Man ‘Intentionally’ Drove Into Closed Texas Grocery Store to Use the Restroom
US announces all forces withdrawn from Iraq after 12-year anti-ISIS mission
Senate hopeful’s ‘treading water’ narrative crumbles under $500K campaign payouts to family
Woke NFL Asks DHS to Remove Hall of Fame Defender from Clip of Agency Vowing to Stop Migrant Caravan
Inside the neighborhood living on the edge of America’s tech frontier
Watch: Lindsay Clancy’s Defense Team Screams at Black Media Member While Entering Courthouse for Retrial Hearing
Liberal stronghold set to adopt eye-popping minimum wage amid business exodus
US faces another major Middle East troop withdrawal, but threat remains
Republicans worry they’ve ‘glossed over’ voters’ affordability concerns
John McGuire touts his Trump endorsement as safe red seat suddenly looks shakier
Ohio cancer patient sues hospital after surgeon allegedly amputated wrong leg
Utah man released after decades on death row as DNA evidence excludes him from 1985 killing

See also  Judge questions whether national security concerns could ever justify Trump’s press ban

“Regrettably, this Court, too must step in to instruct elected officials that freedom of speech means you cannot silence or punish those with whom you disagree,” the NRA urged before going on to mention its millions of members, some of whom they say “have risked everything to protect Americans from terrorism.”

“Therefore, the Resolution’s ‘terrorist’ designation is a frivolous insult—but San Francisco’s actions pose a non-frivolous constitutional threat,” the NRA said.

“In the face of recent, similar blacklisting schemes, financial institutions have expressed reluctance to provide bank accounts for disfavored political groups, and city contractors fear losing their livelihoods if they support or even work with the NRA.”

Through the lawsuit, the NRA is seeking to stop SF from “interfering” in its exercise of rights, assessing the relationships businesses in SF have with the NRA and potentially taking action against them, and enforcing the resolution that was passed on September 4.

The organization is also asking for damages and for an injunction against SF and the Board of Supervisors.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

See also  Judge questions whether national security concerns could ever justify Trump’s press ban

ConservativeModern.com