First Amendment

NRA sues San Francisco for declaring it a domestic terrorist organization

The National Rifle Association is suing the city and county of San Francisco and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for declaring it a domestic terrorist organization earlier this month through a resolution passed by the board.

In the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, the NRA claims that SF and the Board of Supervisors “adopted a new government policy: blacklist anyone linked to the NRA.” They are claiming that the resolution violates the organization’s first and fourteenth amendment rights.

The NRA called the resolution “obviously unconstitutional” before comparing it moves by the state of New York and city of Los Angeles they said were similar to SF’s.


Lawyer says 250-foot Trump arch disrupts historic sightlines cherished by veterans seeking burial at Arlington
Blue States with Powerful Teachers’ Unions Have Far Worse Reading Scores for Students Than Red States with Weak Unions
Republicans fear they have little to offer voters as Congress leaves town
China Throws Its Weight Around in America’s Backyard Over Taiwan Backing
Who is Bert Mizusawa The retired Major General challenging Sen. Mark Warner
A swath of past anti-Trump characters have lost Democratic primary bids
Who is Dario Amodei, the Anthropic CEO pushing independent AI oversight?
Dem’s data center attack in critical Senate race hits snag when money trail surfaces: ‘Jekyll-and-Hyde’
Kirk family has powerful evidence — but Utah law could derail wrongful death case: experts
High School Football Team Shines ‘the Light of Jesus’ by Giving Every Opponent a Bible After Games
Which ‘Fake News’ Outlet Will Trump Ban from the White House Next? He Just Dropped Some Major Hints, and It’s Making Them Squirm
Watch: MLB Player Knocked Out Cold in ‘Terrifying Moment’ – Then Medics Manage to Make Things Worse
Why the House let out early is a matter of debate after Johnson says chamber has ‘done its work’
DOJ Declares it Will No Longer Enforce Two Gun-Control Statutes That Are ‘Inconsistent with the Second Amendment’
Vance calls midterms a referendum on ‘common sense versus pure unadulterated crazy’

“Regrettably, this Court, too must step in to instruct elected officials that freedom of speech means you cannot silence or punish those with whom you disagree,” the NRA urged before going on to mention its millions of members, some of whom they say “have risked everything to protect Americans from terrorism.”

“Therefore, the Resolution’s ‘terrorist’ designation is a frivolous insult—but San Francisco’s actions pose a non-frivolous constitutional threat,” the NRA said.

“In the face of recent, similar blacklisting schemes, financial institutions have expressed reluctance to provide bank accounts for disfavored political groups, and city contractors fear losing their livelihoods if they support or even work with the NRA.”

Through the lawsuit, the NRA is seeking to stop SF from “interfering” in its exercise of rights, assessing the relationships businesses in SF have with the NRA and potentially taking action against them, and enforcing the resolution that was passed on September 4.

The organization is also asking for damages and for an injunction against SF and the Board of Supervisors.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter


ConservativeModern.com