New ‘Impeachment Inquiry’ Star Witness Admits Protecting the ‘Interagency’

The New York Times has obtained the opening statement of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander S. Vindman, the top White House expert on Ukraine, who will testify to the House Intelligence Committee on Tuesday about his concerns about President Donald Trump’s telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in July.

The statement, leaked to the Times — though committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) has likened impeachment to a “grand jury” proceeding, which is typically conducted in secrecy — is described by the Times as the first account of someone who actually listened in on the telephone call, as opposed to hearing about it second- or third-hand.

In his statement, Vindman — a Ukrainian-American and decorated Army officer who was awarded the Purple Heart after being wounded by a roadside bomb in Iraq — outlines his own views on “The Geopolitical Importance of Ukraine.” He adds: “The U.S. government policy community’ s view is that the election of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the promise of reforms to eliminate corruption will lock in Ukraine’ s Western-leaning trajectory.”

Vindman says that he became concerned in the spring of 2019 about “outside influencers promoting a false narrative of Ukraine inconsistent with the consensus views of the interagency.”

That concern for the fate of the “consensus views of the interagency” informed Vindman’s approach to the president’s contacts with Zelensky.

WATCH: Booker continues to reject SAVE Act despite bombshell NJ voter roll scandal

WATCH: Democrats admit when they’d eliminate the filibuster as SAVE Act fight heats up

Mamdani not called to speak at NYC funeral of Army sergeant killed in Iranian attack: report

Police search for gunman after Walmart employee shot during dispute in Pennsylvania

CBS Announces Replacement for Tony Romo After Arrest

Watch: African Who Invaded Spanish City Has Chilling Warning to the Rest of Europe

Former Latvian ‘Dancing with the Stars’ contestant arrested by ICE after violent criminal history revealed

18-Year-Old Woman Murdered in House Owned by Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s Husband

Hunter Biden Targets Donald Trump’s Grandchildren in Vulgar Rant

ICE lodges detainer on Salvadoran national, 18, accused of 2 fatal shootings in Houston

Socialist frontrunner in the hot seat after ‘Cancel Thanksgiving’ post emerges online

Breaking: Trump to Order Attack on Iran Aimed at Forcing Tehran’s Surrender

OnlyFans model Courtney Clenney strikes murder-case plea deal in boyfriend’s stabbing death

Trump warns Iran fighting isn’t over as he vows US will ‘win’ as talks fade

Mangione lawyers say media limits at murder trial are unconstitutional, fear court will ‘hand-pick’ press

He was pleased with Trump’s first congratulatory call to Zelensky in April 2019, but became alarmed in early July when the U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, “started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific investigations in order to secure [a] meeting with the President.” Vindman does not identify those investigations.

Later, during a debriefing with American officials, Sondland “emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election , the Bidens, and Burisma,” Vindman recalls. That is when Vindman pushed back, saying Sondland’s statements were “inappropriate” and the National Security Council would not be involved.

On July 25, when the president called Zelensky to congratulate him on his party’s parliamentary victory, Vindman listened in on the call. He says: “I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’ s support of Ukraine.” Notably, the transcript of the call suggests that Trump did not “demand” an investigation of the Bidens.

Vindman goes on to say that he concluded that if Ukraine was seen as a partisan player in U.S. politics, that could undermine “bipartisan support” for better relations with Ukraine. “This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Vindman argues, substituting his views — or those of the “interagency” — for those of the president himself.