The New York Times has obtained the opening statement of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander S. Vindman, the top White House expert on Ukraine, who will testify to the House Intelligence Committee on Tuesday about his concerns about President Donald Trump’s telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in July.
The statement, leaked to the Times — though committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) has likened impeachment to a “grand jury” proceeding, which is typically conducted in secrecy — is described by the Times as the first account of someone who actually listened in on the telephone call, as opposed to hearing about it second- or third-hand.
In his statement, Vindman — a Ukrainian-American and decorated Army officer who was awarded the Purple Heart after being wounded by a roadside bomb in Iraq — outlines his own views on “The Geopolitical Importance of Ukraine.” He adds: “The U.S. government policy community’ s view is that the election of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the promise of reforms to eliminate corruption will lock in Ukraine’ s Western-leaning trajectory.”
Vindman says that he became concerned in the spring of 2019 about “outside influencers promoting a false narrative of Ukraine inconsistent with the consensus views of the interagency.”
That concern for the fate of the “consensus views of the interagency” informed Vindman’s approach to the president’s contacts with Zelensky.
Obama admin first launched the investigation into Ilhan Omar’s alleged brother marriage
Ex-chief says Christa Pike was ‘almost giddy’ describing murder as governor weighs in after botched execution
Maine, Kansas Senate races neck and neck as Democrats lead in Texas, Michigan, poll shows
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer denies she’ll testify about homicidal thoughts in ex’s suit against her doctors
What comes next for Mary Peltola as her campaign faces decoy investigation
AG Todd Blanche Calls a Spade a Spade on Alaska Dems: ‘They Are Cheating’
Alaska Governor Orders Investigation Into Alleged Dem Ballot Plot to Trick and Confuse GOP Voters
Israeli top election official orders Shin Bet to investigate allegations of foreign interference with Arab vote
Bolsonaro declares himself ‘leader’ of Brazil after fleeing country, arriving in Miami
Judge rejects DOJ request to block California from immediately counting ballots linked to alleged noncitizens
Fiance of Dem Who Lost to El-Sayed in Close Primary Announces He’s Voting For His GOP Challenger Because of Anti-Semitism, Libs Flip
Is Hasan Piker Disenfranchising Blacks? You Have To Show ID to Get Into Terror-Supporting Commie’s Events, After All
Thune goes all-in on campaign trail as Schumer stays on bench, faces rejection from fellow Dems
DHS investigates massive data breach exposing 40,000 employees, including ICE and Border Patrol agents
Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community
He was pleased with Trump’s first congratulatory call to Zelensky in April 2019, but became alarmed in early July when the U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, “started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific investigations in order to secure [a] meeting with the President.” Vindman does not identify those investigations.
Later, during a debriefing with American officials, Sondland “emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election , the Bidens, and Burisma,” Vindman recalls. That is when Vindman pushed back, saying Sondland’s statements were “inappropriate” and the National Security Council would not be involved.
On July 25, when the president called Zelensky to congratulate him on his party’s parliamentary victory, Vindman listened in on the call. He says: “I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’ s support of Ukraine.” Notably, the transcript of the call suggests that Trump did not “demand” an investigation of the Bidens.
Vindman goes on to say that he concluded that if Ukraine was seen as a partisan player in U.S. politics, that could undermine “bipartisan support” for better relations with Ukraine. “This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Vindman argues, substituting his views — or those of the “interagency” — for those of the president himself.
Obama admin first launched the investigation into Ilhan Omar’s alleged brother marriage
Ex-chief says Christa Pike was ‘almost giddy’ describing murder as governor weighs in after botched execution
Maine, Kansas Senate races neck and neck as Democrats lead in Texas, Michigan, poll shows
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer denies she’ll testify about homicidal thoughts in ex’s suit against her doctors
What comes next for Mary Peltola as her campaign faces decoy investigation
AG Todd Blanche Calls a Spade a Spade on Alaska Dems: ‘They Are Cheating’
Alaska Governor Orders Investigation Into Alleged Dem Ballot Plot to Trick and Confuse GOP Voters
Israeli top election official orders Shin Bet to investigate allegations of foreign interference with Arab vote
Bolsonaro declares himself ‘leader’ of Brazil after fleeing country, arriving in Miami
Judge rejects DOJ request to block California from immediately counting ballots linked to alleged noncitizens
Fiance of Dem Who Lost to El-Sayed in Close Primary Announces He’s Voting For His GOP Challenger Because of Anti-Semitism, Libs Flip
Is Hasan Piker Disenfranchising Blacks? You Have To Show ID to Get Into Terror-Supporting Commie’s Events, After All
Thune goes all-in on campaign trail as Schumer stays on bench, faces rejection from fellow Dems
DHS investigates massive data breach exposing 40,000 employees, including ICE and Border Patrol agents
Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community
Vindman says that he reported his concerns to the National Security Council’s lead counsel. He denies being the so-called “whistleblower” or knowing the identity of the “whistleblower,” or wishing to speculate about such. He concludes with another policy view: “The United States and Ukraine are and must remain strategic partners.”
At no point does Vindman accuse the president of breaking the law, but of doing what he thought “inappropriate.”
The public will not see Vindman face questions from the committee, because it is being held behind closed doors and “in defiance of a White House edict not to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry,” the Times reports, though it does not explain that the reason for the White House stance is that the House has not yet authorized the inquiry.
Only one copy of the transcript of Vindman’s testimony will be provided to Republican members of the committee, who will only be allowed to review the transcript with a Democratic staffer present to observe them at all times.
Story cited here.
