Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wrote a letter to her Democrat colleagues in the House on Sunday to reveal a new “War Powers Resolution” that amounts to a pre-emptive surrender to Iran in ongoing hostilities.
Pelosi’s letter begins with the declaration that President Donald Trump’s airstrike last week targeting Iranian General Qasem Suleimani, leader of the terrorist Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IGRC) Quds Force, responsible for the murders of hundreds of Americans and for recent attacks on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, was “provocative and disproportionate,” terms suggesting the attack was illegal under international law and could constitute a war crime.
Harvard Law School professor emeritus (and Democrat) Alan Dershowitz argued in Monday’s Wall Street Journal that the strike was not only lawful, but an “easy call”: “The president has the constitutional authority to take military actions, short of declaring war, that he and his advisers deem necessary to protect American citizens. This authority is extremely broad, especially when the actions must, by their nature, be kept secret from the intended target.”
James Talarico Calls Biden’s Border ‘Utter Chaos’ In Attempted Immigration Rebrand
Rahm Emanuel road-tests emphasis on policy over Trump-hatred
Who is Bill Essayli, the hard-charging prosecutor at the center of California’s election fight?
Platner’s ‘deranged’ response to Musk becoming a trillionaire sparks online outrage: ‘Loserthink’
Op-Ed: What the Court Refused to Say About Your Money
Trump administration attempts to ramp up Alaska oil and gas drilling
WATCH: House Dems blame racism, ‘all-White’ jury for Karmelo Anthony’s guilty verdict
Ukrainian national who completed Air Force officer training convicted in ghost gun 3D printing operation
Trump says US military eliminated ‘infamous’ Tren de Aragua leader in lethal strike
Federal judge rules she lacks authority to reinstate fired Yosemite ranger who flew trans pride flag
Op-Ed: Operation Epic Fury and the Lesser Evil
Young McDonald’s Worker in ICU After Co-Worker Doused Him in Boiling Oil, According to Horrified Mom
Spencer Pratt Begins ‘Phase 3’ of ‘Saving LA,’ Reveals He Has Recordings That Will Make Opponent ‘Resign in Shame’
Trump Threatens to ‘Take Back’ D.C. and ‘Run it on a Federal Basis’ as Mamdani-Style Socialist Leads Mayoral Race
Deadly Mass Shooting Triggers ‘All Hands on Deck Situation’ in Texas City
Nonetheless, Pelosi’s letter indicates that the House will declare the president’s action illegal under international law.
The letter further claims that Trump’s action “endangered our servicemembers, diplomats and others by risking a serious escalation of tensions with Iran” — placing the responsibility for violence not on Iran, which recently attacked a U.S. Navy drone; a Saudi oil field; and, via proxies, Americans soldiers and civilians in Iraq; but on the United States, which had restrained itself until the recent assault by an Iranian-backed militia on the embassy.
The letter goes on to describe a new resolution that would “limit the President’s military actions regarding Iran,” essentially signaling a surrender in the potential conflict before the Iranian regime itself had managed to respond.
Pelosi adds that the resolution “reasserts Congress’s long-established oversight responsibilities by mandating that if no further Congressional action is taken, the Administration’s military hostilities with regard to Iran cease within 30 days.” Under current law, the War Powers Act of 1973 limits the time that a president can lead a military effort, without formal authorization, to 60 days following a required presidential report to Congress when hostilities begin.
The new resolution, which Pelosi says mirrors a similar Senate bill by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), would amount to an effective surrender by signaling that the president had no congressional support for striking back against Iran, and imposing a new deadline for any military action that would give Iran greater freedom of action. Paradoxically, the resolution could force the president to choose more drastic measures of conducting a war effort before the deadline.
By declaring the attack “provocative and disproportionate,” the resolution also invites international prosecution of the president, as well as members of the administration and the military itself, who carry out his orders. The U.S. does not recognize the authority of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to prosecute Americans for war crimes, but the ICC takes a different view, and a future Democratic administration might well side with the ICC instead.
James Talarico Calls Biden’s Border ‘Utter Chaos’ In Attempted Immigration Rebrand
Rahm Emanuel road-tests emphasis on policy over Trump-hatred
Who is Bill Essayli, the hard-charging prosecutor at the center of California’s election fight?
Platner’s ‘deranged’ response to Musk becoming a trillionaire sparks online outrage: ‘Loserthink’
Op-Ed: What the Court Refused to Say About Your Money
Trump administration attempts to ramp up Alaska oil and gas drilling
WATCH: House Dems blame racism, ‘all-White’ jury for Karmelo Anthony’s guilty verdict
Ukrainian national who completed Air Force officer training convicted in ghost gun 3D printing operation
Trump says US military eliminated ‘infamous’ Tren de Aragua leader in lethal strike
Federal judge rules she lacks authority to reinstate fired Yosemite ranger who flew trans pride flag
Op-Ed: Operation Epic Fury and the Lesser Evil
Young McDonald’s Worker in ICU After Co-Worker Doused Him in Boiling Oil, According to Horrified Mom
Spencer Pratt Begins ‘Phase 3’ of ‘Saving LA,’ Reveals He Has Recordings That Will Make Opponent ‘Resign in Shame’
Trump Threatens to ‘Take Back’ D.C. and ‘Run it on a Federal Basis’ as Mamdani-Style Socialist Leads Mayoral Race
Deadly Mass Shooting Triggers ‘All Hands on Deck Situation’ in Texas City
Pelosi’s letter indicates that the new “War Powers Resolution” will be introduced and voted on this week. She has not yet indicated when she will transfer the articles of impeachment passed by the House on Dec. 18 to the Senate, which she claims is a necessary prerequisite to the Senate holding a trial on the president’s removal from office.
Story cited here.









