Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) reportedly came up with the idea of withholding the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump from the Senate by watching CNN, according to Time magazine.
Time reported Thursday that Pelosi was inspired by an on-air suggestion from John Dean, the disgraced former White House counsel for President Richard Nixon who went to federal prison for his role in the Watergate cover-up and is a frequent CNN guest today.
Time report by Molly Ball (via Byron York of the Washington Examiner) says:
Pelosi, according to an aide, had been mulling the tactic since she heard former Nixon White House counsel John Dean float the idea on CNN on Dec. 5. In the committee meeting, she added that she believed McConnell would be motivated to move. “Somebody said to me today that he may not even take up what we send. [But] then [Trump] will never be vindicated,” she said, according to the aide in the room. “He will be impeached forever. Forever. No matter what the Senate does.”
The following day, Pelosi presided over the floor vote on impeachment, wearing a striking black suit to project solemnity, accessorized with a large gold brooch of the Mace of the Republic, a symbol of the House. When scattered cheers broke out inside the chamber after the first article was approved, she sternly and silently shushed them with a glare and a sharp gesture. After the vote, she announced that she did not plan to transmit the articles right away, saying she could not determine how to appoint House impeachment managers until the Senate decides on its rules for the trial.
FN4220H8 title
FN4220H7 title
Minneapolis ‘Clan Violence’ Targets Scholar Who Exposed Ilhan Omar’s Father as Colonel in Bloody Regime, Forces Him to Cancel Visit: Report
Mamdani Vowed for Accountability in Catastrophic Building Collapse That Killed 8 – New Report Points the Finger at His Own Admin
Justice Alito warns America must preserve 3 core principles regardless of country’s ‘atmosphere’
White House lawyer’s hardball warning to Dems has legal experts on both sides questioning one key threat
Dems seize on midterm rout to demand ICE reform but polls reveal a twist in who prioritized immigration
Democrats eye killing Senate filibuster as lawmaker warns move could be a ‘double-edged sword’
Woke Formula One Driver Visits, Condemns Wall Imprisoning Palestinians – Clearly Has No Idea Egypt Actually Built It
The Genius Voting System We Could Use That Rewards Working, Military Service, and Age – Penalizes Taking Welfare, Being Criminal
Rep. Ro Khanna Demands We Begin ‘Rejecting This Idea of Heritage Americans’
Anti-Trump Republican courts other defectors as House weighs another vote against Iran war
Pentagon’s former UFO investigator offers simple theory for mysterious jellyfish-shaped object on video
Florida Republican on Democrats’ strategy: ‘That’s the choice they have to make…persecution or policy’
Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy Explains What Went Wrong as FAA Lifts Nationwide Ground Stop
Previously, reports suggested that Pelosi had been taking the advice of Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe, who also advised Democrats that they could withhold the articles of impeachment as leverage — even though the Constitution says explicitly that “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” There is nothing in the text of the Constitution describing the transmission of articles of impeachment. Current Senate rules suggest that the trial follows the transmission of the articles, though the rules can be changed by a majority vote.
Pelosi’s gambit has been something of a strategic disaster. She and her party rushed the impeachment — even skipping or withdrawing subpoenas for witnesses — on the argument that the president needed to be removed from office urgently to prevent him from soliciting foreign interference in the 2020 election. However, the House has delayed the transmission of the articles of impeachment to the Senate for more than three weeks.
Democrats argue they are using the articles as leverage to force the Senate to conduct what they consider a “fair” trial, with additional witnesses and documents, but that argument is being mocked by Republicans, who note that Democrats departed from past precedents and basic procedural fairness when conducting their rushed impeachment in the House.
Story cited here.
