Most U.S. Hospitals Are Empty Soon They Might Be Closed For Good

Tens of thousands of health care workers across the United States are going without pay today, even as providers in the nation’s hot spots struggle to contain the coronavirus pandemic

This “tale of two hospitals” is a function of clumsy, if well-intentioned, federal and state directives to halt all non-emergency procedures, which appeared at first blush to be a reasonable precaution to limit unnecessary exposure and safeguard staff, beds and equipment.

But instead of merely preserving hospital beds and other resources, this heavy-handed injunction has created a burden of its own design: a historic number of empty beds in systems left untouched by the pandemic.

Those hospitals have resorted to unprecedented levels of furloughs to stave off temporary budget shortfalls, but industry and economic trends point to more lasting outcomes unless immediate action is taken.

At 18 percent of the U.S. economy, health care is a $3.6 trillion industry annually. By barring all elective surgeries, which covers a huge array of operations, like knee reconstructions or even cancer biopsies, hospitals have been denied billions in revenue in just the last month alone.

Outpatient services account for half of all hospital revenue, which means hospitals are now making, and spending, half what they were this time last year.

Jack Smith withheld names from judges who greenlit GOP lawmakers’ phone records access

Trump tells Colorado governor and district attorney to ‘rot in Hell’ over Tina Peters incarceration

Germany’s Merz says Europe must ‘defend and assert’ interests amid ‘changing’ relations with US

Somali daycare in Minnesota broken into, key documents stolen in overnight burglary

Blue cities U-turn on distributing drug supplies to addicts after progressive policies fail to stem epidemic

President Trump Has a Backup Plan if the Supreme Court Strikes Down His Tariffs

Treasury targets oil traders, tankers accused of helping Maduro evade U.S. sanctions

Ex-police officer given prison time in case prosecuted under Soros DA sees conviction overturned a year later

Trump Presides Over the Largest One-Year Drop in Homicides Ever Recorded

CNN Finally Shows Up at Minneapolis Day Care, But for All the Wrong Reasons

Why the Times Square Ball Will Drop Twice This Year for the First Time Ever

San Francisco mayor quietly signs reparations fund that could lead to $5M payments per person

Boebert hits back at Trump after veto of Colorado water bill, raises retaliation concerns

Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders

Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify

It’s not surprising, then, that the industry shed a record 43,000 health care workers in the first month of this crisis. Experts expect equal or greater layoffs this month, when the sustained forbearance has made revenue even more urgent.

Even before this crisis, one in four rural hospitals were vulnerable to closure. Now, many of these rural systems have more empty beds than ever before.

It doesn’t take an economist to understand the underlying economics here. And it won’t just be rural health care that will suffer—hospitals in every corner of the country might close for good.

The coronavirus will continue to spread throughout the United States, but our ability to treat and prevent its transmission will be severely constrained if as-yet-unaffected hospitals resort to mass layoffs. We need to sustain robust staffing in every corner of this country—and prohibiting elective surgeries outright is wildly counterproductive.

Understand: The availability of clinicians in hot spots like New York City, New Orleans and Detroit is no more an urgent public health crisis than health care staffing everywhere else because when this is over these patients will still require dialysis, chemotherapy and other life-saving treatments.

Health care has historically weathered economic downturns in stride because people get sick even in depressions, but this is unlike previous slumps. In the past 30 years, there have been only four months where the industry destroyed jobs. What used to be the worst case, in 2003, was just one-quarter of the losses experienced in March.

Hospitals are in the business of treating patients, but few are any more—which means more furloughs are ahead unless and until hospitals are allowed to perform their basic function: provide health care.