Most U.S. Hospitals Are Empty Soon They Might Be Closed For Good

Tens of thousands of health care workers across the United States are going without pay today, even as providers in the nation’s hot spots struggle to contain the coronavirus pandemic

This “tale of two hospitals” is a function of clumsy, if well-intentioned, federal and state directives to halt all non-emergency procedures, which appeared at first blush to be a reasonable precaution to limit unnecessary exposure and safeguard staff, beds and equipment.

But instead of merely preserving hospital beds and other resources, this heavy-handed injunction has created a burden of its own design: a historic number of empty beds in systems left untouched by the pandemic.

Those hospitals have resorted to unprecedented levels of furloughs to stave off temporary budget shortfalls, but industry and economic trends point to more lasting outcomes unless immediate action is taken.

At 18 percent of the U.S. economy, health care is a $3.6 trillion industry annually. By barring all elective surgeries, which covers a huge array of operations, like knee reconstructions or even cancer biopsies, hospitals have been denied billions in revenue in just the last month alone.

Outpatient services account for half of all hospital revenue, which means hospitals are now making, and spending, half what they were this time last year.

Many RNC Convention Attendees Balked at Trump’s Plan to Cut $5K Checks for Americans

Tucker Carlson Defends El-Sayed on 9/11, Condemns His GOP Opponent Mike Rogers

Smithsonian’s dark take on America exposed: Washington dubbed ‘town destroyer,’ Revolutionary War ‘dangerous’

Alito, Thomas shred ‘Hail Mary’ challenge to federal ballot mail rules in dissent

Surrogate who refused abortion asks SCOTUS to intervene as baby could be moved out of Texas

Georgia mayor, 23, ousted 10 months after making history as state’s youngest mayor

Republicans Attack GOP Candidate for Pointing Out How Many Foreign Students Attended Texas-Ohio State Game

Breaking: SCOTUS Blocks Trump’s Mail-in Ballot Restrictions Months Before Midterms

‘Trojan horses’ in America: Congress probes influence networks tied to China, Iran and Cuba

House Dems face Trump tariff dilemma as major Russia sanctions bill heads to floor

Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to revive strict mail-ballot rules before midterms

Trump Gives Huge Update on Russia-Ukraine War That Could Ease Pain at the Gas Pumps

Mamdani blasts feds for waging ‘campaign of violence and terror’ against NYC’s immigrants

House unanimously votes to eliminate 1-cent coin permanently

GOP Gov. Candidate Forced to Swim for His Life After Plane Crash – Reporter Says Water Was ‘Only 30 Feet’ Deep

It’s not surprising, then, that the industry shed a record 43,000 health care workers in the first month of this crisis. Experts expect equal or greater layoffs this month, when the sustained forbearance has made revenue even more urgent.

Even before this crisis, one in four rural hospitals were vulnerable to closure. Now, many of these rural systems have more empty beds than ever before.

It doesn’t take an economist to understand the underlying economics here. And it won’t just be rural health care that will suffer—hospitals in every corner of the country might close for good.

The coronavirus will continue to spread throughout the United States, but our ability to treat and prevent its transmission will be severely constrained if as-yet-unaffected hospitals resort to mass layoffs. We need to sustain robust staffing in every corner of this country—and prohibiting elective surgeries outright is wildly counterproductive.

Understand: The availability of clinicians in hot spots like New York City, New Orleans and Detroit is no more an urgent public health crisis than health care staffing everywhere else because when this is over these patients will still require dialysis, chemotherapy and other life-saving treatments.

Health care has historically weathered economic downturns in stride because people get sick even in depressions, but this is unlike previous slumps. In the past 30 years, there have been only four months where the industry destroyed jobs. What used to be the worst case, in 2003, was just one-quarter of the losses experienced in March.

Hospitals are in the business of treating patients, but few are any more—which means more furloughs are ahead unless and until hospitals are allowed to perform their basic function: provide health care.